Mahzor

New York Public Library

Churches

Sarajevo Haggadah

Mah Nishtanah

Sarajevo haggadah

Antaea Darom

Israeli women's art

Action

Torah as music

Ben Heine

Action

ceramic bowl

Mohammad Said Kalash, "Offering Reconciliation" exhibit (photo: Ilan Amihai)

Action

Punch and Judy/Pinchas and Jamila

Avi Katz

Action

David Grossman

Ben Heine

Action

Eldrige Street shul

Lower East Side

Action

Dove

Ben Heine

Action

Two birds

Hoda Jamal

Action

Israeli and Palestinian boys

from documentary, Promises

Action

Cat in the Hat

Yiddish version

Action

Daylight through the Wall

Banksy: graffiti art on Separation Wall

Action

Maurice Sendak's Brundibar set

New Victory Theater (photo: Nan Melville/NYT)

Action

Daniel Barenboim, West-Eastern Divan Orchestra

Palestinian-Israeli musical ensemble (photo: Kerstin Joensson/AP)

Action

Great Day on Eldrige Street

N.Y.'s klezmer greats celebrate shul rededication (photo: Leo Sorel)

Action

Joint Appeal for Peace

(Avi Katz)

Joint Appeal for Peace

Ketubah, Ancona, Italy (1772)

(Jewish Theological Seminary library)

Ancona ketubah

Posts Tagged ‘keith ellison’

Rep. Brian Baird: Break Gaza Siege

Sunday, February 14th, 2010


Rep. Brian Baird (D, WA) is now in Gaza speaking truth to power. He in effect told our president: “Mr. Obama, tear down this siege!” What a profile in courage:

A U.S. congressman says the United States should break Israel’s blockade of Gaza and deliver badly needed supplies by sea.

Rep. Brian Baird, a Democrat from Washington state, also says President Barack Obama’s Mideast envoy should visit Gaza to get a look at the destruction cause by Israel’s offensive last year.

The U.S. shuns Gaza because the territory’s Hamas rulers refuse to recognize Israel or renounce violence.

Baird, who has announced his retirement from Congress, spoke Sunday evening to a group of Gaza students.

Israel and Egypt have kept Gaza’s borders largely sealed since 2006, and have not allowed building supplies into the area. Baird said that U.S. vessels should anchor off Gaza and deliver what’s needed.

Here is one House member who has a conscience and isn’t afraid to express it. I should add that for his troubles the Israeli government and its operatives in this country closely monitor his trips to Gaza along with those of Keith Ellison, who has accompanied Baird on previous visits. Thus it is no accident that the recent letter from 54 House Democrats to the president calling on him to pressure Israel to ease the siege has been attacked by the Republican Jewish Coalition and others by falsely featuring Ellison as its author: not true, that honor goes to my own House representative Jim McDermott.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Republican Jewish Coalition: Kampeas, Besser ‘Leftist Propagandists, Weasels’

Friday, February 12th, 2010

The RJC tweet smeared round the world

The RJC may not realize it but if there is any justice in the world they’ve just stepped in a big pile of dog poop and some staffer’s head should roll.

First a little back story: recently 54 members of Congress and major peace groups (among them Peace Now, J Street and B’Tselem) sent separate letters to Pres. Obama urging him to pressure Israel to relieve the siege of Gaza.  The letters were groundbreaking for several reasons. First, I can’t remember the last time a large group of Congress members and Mideast peace groups coordinated any political activity so publicly and forcefully.  Second, never before have members of Congress been so bold as to call outright for the end of the savage suffering inflicted by this illegal siege.  This is yet another nail in the coffin of the Israel lobby and its stranglehold over such discourse in Washington DC.  In the past, publicly advocating a position sympathetic to Palestinians would have been absolute anathema.

I’m proud to declare that Jim McDermott, my House member, drafted this statement and spearheaded it together with the first Muslim-American member, Keith Ellison.  The Forward covered the story.  Here is a portion of the statement directed to Pres. Obama:

Thank you for your…commitment of $300 million in U.S. aid to rebuild the Gaza Strip. We write to you with great concern about the ongoing crisis in Gaza.

The people of Gaza have suffered enormously since the blockade imposed by Israel and Egypt following Hamas’ coup, and particularly following Operation Cast Lead. We also sympathize deeply with the people of southern Israel who have suffered from abhorrent rocket and mortar attacks. We recognize that the Israeli government has imposed restrictions on Gaza out of a legitimate and keenly felt fear of continued terrorist action by Hamas and other militant groups. This concern must be addressed without resulting in the de facto collective punishment of the Palestinian residents of the Gaza Strip. Truly, fulfilling the needs of civilians in Israel and Gaza are mutually reinforcing goals.

The unabated suffering of Gazan civilians highlights the urgency of reaching a resolution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, and we ask you to press for immediate relief for the citizens of Gaza as an urgent component of your broader Middle East peace efforts. The current blockade has severely impeded the ability of aid agencies to do their work to relieve suffering, and we ask that you advocate for immediate improvements for Gaza…

The peace groups’ letter is slightly more forceful in addressing the siege:

We urge, therefore, that your administration use America’s unique relationship with Israel to persuade it to lift the closure of its border crossing with Gaza now.

Of course, the counter-attack has been hot and heavy.  Yvette Clark (D, Brooklyn), who is African-American renounced her support when Agudath Israel, the far-right pro-Israel Orthodox group, organized constituents to read her the riot act and publicly humiliated her at a meeting they called.  She obediently announced her capitulation.

Further, the slimeballs at the Republican Jewish Coalition have gotten in on the act.  And when they do you know something really, really dirty will come out of it.  The RJC has done nothing less than accuse two veteran Jewish journalists, Ron Kampeas (JTA) and James Besser (Jewish Week) of being “leftist propagandists and weasels.”

Why?  Because they dared to question the truth and accuracy of claims the RJC made in attacking the Congressional letter.  Kampeas had the temerity to accuse the RJC of telling an “untruth” in this statement:

These 54 Democrats expressed no concern whatsoever about the consequences their ideas might have for Israelis living under the threat of terrorism from Gaza!

Anyone who can read can see from the above passage that the Democrats who signed this letter expressed strong support for the residents of Sderot.

Besser also did something unpardonable: he implied the RJC was being racist and misleading in identifying the letter solely with its Muslim-American co-sponsor, Ellison.  The latter is a convenient target for the Republican Jewish anti-minority machine.  They don’t have much use for African-Americans OR Muslims and Ellison is the ‘daily double’ as far as they’re concerned.

Besser adds this interesting perspective to the controversy about Ellison:

…Everybody wants to blame Ellison, which raises some interesting questions, starting with this one: does being pro-Palestinian automatically mean a politician is anti-Israel? Can someone be friendly and sympathetic to both sides?

…Every time I’ve heard him speak…he’s stressed his belief that both sides in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict need to do more to live up to past commitments and take greater chances for peace. He’s spoken clearly about Israel’s need for security as part of any ultimate settlement.  He speaks the language of compromise – for both sides.

In short, he sounds pro-Palestinian without sounding anti-Israel.

Still, many castigate him  as just another Israel hater, which they seem to find even easier because of his religion.

So I wonder: are pro-Israel forces only interested in working with those who are 100 percent on their side, and defining everybody else as beyond the pale?

So for penning some relatively mild and thoughtful questions for the Israel lobby about why it demonizes everyone it can’t control, you get tarred and feathered and practically called anti-Israel.  Next thing you know they’ll be calling for Kampeas and Besser’s heads on a platter.

I know this is going to sound strange but…in a perverse way this is a good thing.  Yet another example of the lobby overreaching.  They see a chance to go for the jugular and point out the perfidy of Democrats toward Israel.  But by the very nature of their attack they’ve discredited themselves among the lion’s share of American Jewry who are more fair-minded and lucid on these same matters.

So I say: whichever RJC goon tweeted that message about Besser and Kampeas–promote him.  The higher this guy rises to his level of incompetence and pro-Israel fury, the quicker the lobby will be vanquished or turned into something truly pro-Israel.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Israeli Intelligence Operations Target U.S. Congressional Leaders

Tuesday, April 28th, 2009

Thanks to a confidential source, I’ll be lifting the veil, in this post, on Israeli intelligence gathering regarding members of Congress from the Midwest.  Before I do, I want to make clear that what I’m about to describe is not espionage and doesn’t even involve the Mossad, which does operate here in the U.S.  This is just run of the mill intelligence gathering.  But what makes this especially interesting is that despite the fact that the individuals below are doing nothing illegal, the tone and contents of their remarks are so objectionable, that one wonders what one would find if one knew what the Mossad was up to here.

My source informs me that last month, Israeli diplomats in Jerusalem, Chicago and Washington made a series of calls to review the status of relationships with the Midwest’s members of Congress.  Senior diplomats from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs explained to Israeli diplomatic personnel that the purpose of getting to know these elected officials was to advance Israel’s agenda in Congress.  In other words, Israel pursues a diplomatic strategy in this country that involves overt lobbying for Israel’s interests.

I’m not conversant with how other foreign governments handle such activity via their embassies and consulates, but I’d venture to say that if the average American knew that not only were various Israel lobby groups like the Israel Project, Aipac, Stand With Us, and many others advancing a pro-Israel political agenda, but a foreign embassy was doing so not only on its own, but in close collaboration with these domestic Jewish groups–that such campaigning would raise a red flag in the eyes of many.

I repeat something I wrote last night. I detest the accusation of dual loyalty and find it a despicable canard.  But in truth, Israel’s government seems only too happy to place U.S. Jews in such a position that this charge becomes credible.  And American Jewish groups and leaders are willing participants.

According to my source, the senior representative from the Washington D.C. embassy focussed his efforts of the Chicago consulate because the president hails from the city, as does the new chair of the Conference of Presidents, and Aipac’s incoming president.

In general, Israeli diplomats are most interested in members of Congress who serve on the intelligence, defense, foreign affairs and appropriations committees since those deal with issues of most concern to Israel.  This explains peripherally, why they would devote so much time and attention to cultivating Jane Harman, since she stood to become chair of the House intelligence committee if Pelosi had agreed to retain her on the committee (which she didn’t).

The Israeli officials involved in these calls and meetings displayed a combination of chutzpah and arrogance in evaluating their Congressional targets.  My informant indicates they were annoyed at their inability to gain access to Sen. Russell Feingold despite the fact that his sister is a rabbi and has visited Israel.  Note that a trip to Israel in their view is like a tetanus inoculation bestowing excellent pro-Israel health and antibodies against “pro-Arab propaganda.”

When a diplomat described Rep. David Obey as not a great friend of Israel and borderline hostile, the D.C. embassy representative reminded his staff that they could schedule meetings with staff when Congress members are not available (which presumably would positively influence their boss).

There is a strong underlying theme of Iran as playing an important role in the Israeli diplomatic agenda here in the U.S.  My source tells me the Israelis have noted that Sen. John Thune introduced anti-Iran legislation in the last session and that Rep. Mark Kirk planned to introduce new punitive legislation targeting that country.  The Israelis sang the praises of Sen. Sam Brownback, who planned a conference that would exert economic pressure on Iran.  The D.C. embassy plans to follow up with him to encourage his plans.

Sen. Clare McCaskill is a particular focus of the Israelis because she is a confidant of the president and a member of the armed services and homeland security committees.  The Israelis plan to establish close relations with McCaskill and her staff.  Another Missouri legislator, Russ Carnahan, receives no such royal treatment.  He is viewed, like Obey, as not friendly to Israel.  Why?  Because during a meeting with him, he highlighted to the Israeli representative his sympathy for the poor people of Gaza.  The reason for this sympathy in the eyes of the Israelis?  The legislator was poisoned by information from the Arab lobby.

Once again we can see the close coordination between the Israeli government and local Jewish leaders, as when one Israeli diplomat said that members of the St. Louis Jewish community conveyed their “expectations” to Carnahan and reminded him on which side his bread was buttered.  It appears that the local community and embassy serve as one-two knockout punches in the face of hostile targets like Carnahan.

My source told me Israeli diplomatic staff have noted a problematic relationship with two Minnesota representatives, Keith Ellison and Betty McCollum.  Though they consider Ellison, a Muslim, “not anti-Israel,” they noted he was quite attentive to the Arab lobby.  Clearly they were keeping a close eye on Ellison’s schedule as they knew he was receiving an UNWRA briefing that very day about conditions in Gaza.

My source told me further, the Israelis noted with displeasure that Ellison has teamed up with Washington State Rep. Brian Baird (the two visited Gaza together around the time that John Kerry took a separate trip there–the two Congressional visits served to highlight the horrible conditions under which Gazans lived in the aftermath of the war last winter).

My source has learned that the Israelis are monitoring a new Indiana representative, Andre Carson who like Ellison is Muslim.  But it seems they playing “good Muslim, bad Muslim,”    as Carson, they noted, hasn’t yet taken any “radical” positions and therefore might serve as a counter-weight to “bad Muslim” Ellison.

This is how the Israelis play the game.  They’re kicking ass and taking names. They’ll skirt right up to the edge of impropriety and even go over it if they feel they can.  The only way to rein them in is by revelations such as the Jane Harman story or the Aipac Two spying scandal.  These incidents chasten them for a time–till they are emboldened once again (remember Jonathan Pollard and the Israeli pledge never to engage in domestic U.S. spying?).

The price of liberty is eternal vigilance.  In the case of Israel’s domestic intelligence gathering, this is doubly true.

Jewish Leader Colludes With Israeli Embassy in Monitoring House Member ‘Hostile’ to Israel

Tuesday, April 28th, 2009

If you’re like me, you find Sy Hersh a bracing, but alarmist and perhaps hyperbole-prone analyst of U.S. policy.  I feel likewise about those who propound theories about Israeli penetration of U.S. political, military and security circles.  But lately, I’m changing my tune on this.

It began with the Aipac spying scandal involving Steven Rosen and Keith Weissman as the tip-of-the-iceberg conspirators, along with Israeli embassy staffer, Naor Gilon and Pentagon specialist, Larry Franklin.  My anxiety level has been ratcheted up a notch or two by the report of Jane Harman’s collusion with what the N.Y. Times calls an “Israeli intelligence operative,” to intercede with the Bush administration to mitigate the charges against the Aipac Two.

It is no secret that Israel maintains one of the most ambitious and energetic spy operations in this country, perhaps second or third only to Russia or China.  In this post, I will reveal some not quite so ordinary collusion between the American Jewish community’s leadership and Israeli embassy staffers to monitor the travels and views of a House member they deem to be hostile to Israel’s interests. This isn’t even espionage in the standard sense of the term.  More like what the Don used to call: “Keep you friends close, but your enemies closer.”  And it still stinks.

Earlier this month, a senior official of Israel’s D.C. embassy contacted a Minneapolis Jewish communal staffer, to inform him about a D.C. meeting between Congressmember Keith Ellison and deputy chief of mission, Jeremy Issacharoff.  Ellison, you’ll recall, is the first Muslim-American elected to Congress.  He also led a mission a month or so ago to Gaza with Washington State Congressmember Brian Baird.

You can bet your bottom dollar that both local Jewish communal and embassy staff want to monitor Ellison’s every move.  Ellison traveled to Saudi Arabia on a state trade mission, which is of course what members of Congress do on a regular basis to drum up business for their state.  But that’s a no-no as far as Israel is concerned and grounds for further suspecting Ellison’s motives.

Though the latter’s actual views of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict are quite moderate (especially considering he is Muslim), my source tells me that the embassy staffer during the conversation only gave Ellison credit for attempting to appear balanced concerning Israel during his meeting with Issacharoff.  In fact, the embassy staffer found it so unusual that Ellison didn’t mention war crimes accusations that had surfaced concerned IDF behavior in Gaza, that he noted this in his conversation with the Minneapolis staffer.

Minneapolis seems to be a hotbed of pro-Israel communal activism.  A local Aipac activist once accused Cong. Betty McCollum of supporting terrorism because she would not support an Aipac congressional resolution.  The local JCRC also encouraged a local college to cancel a speech by Nobel Prize winner Desmond Tutu, falsely claiming that he’d likened Israel to Hitler.  It should be no surprise then that local communal staffers are such willing handmaidens to the intelligence work of the State of Israel.  And perhaps no surprise that there may be others with a conscience in Minneapolis or in D.C. who find this behavior reprehensible.

The life of an Israeli embassy staffer appears to be little more than that of a glorified baseball statistician.  They do head counts of who’s pro-Israel in Congress and who’s not.  They meet with their friends on the Hill to thank them for flacking, er, speaking on Israel’s behalf and they meet with their perceived enemies to distribute Israeli talking points which somehow will miraculously persuade them of the error of their ways.

In an unrelated matter, almost everyone knows that Israel is desperate to advance the notion of an Iranian existential threat to Israel.  That country’s intelligence apparatus attempts to insert this narrative into U.S. political discourse every chance it gets.

I’ve been informed by a confidential source that in September 2008, before one of the presidential debates, an Israeli operative attempted unsuccessfully to meet with a debate panelist in order to plant a question about war against Iran: would the candidates take military action against that country or accept a nuclear armed Iran?  The Israelis did NOT want any question that asked what the candidates might do if Israel attacked Iran.  This is probably because they want to plant in the minds of Americans that war with Iran may be necessary.  That way, if Israel does attack, the news will not be such a shock.  But they do not want Americans to think too long and hard about Israel being the initiator of such a conflict.  That would give them time to think about the reasons why this might not be such a good idea.

There is probably nothing illegal in anything I’ve described.  Indeed, Israel’s supporters will argue that I’ve only described Israelis and American Jews doing their jobs.  But I have a different take: why do American Jewish leaders and the Israeli embassy need to have such a symbiotic relationship?  Why should American Jews be providing intelligence to Israel about a U.S. congressmember doing his job on behalf of his constituents?  At the least, it’s unseemly and doesn’t speak well for those who (like me) argue against the notion of dual loyalty.

And why should Israeli intelligence attempt to intervene so overtly in an American presidential campaign?  I wonder what an Israeli voter might think if he or she discovered that U.S. intelligence operatives were planting questions during Israeli election debates.

CNN Correspondent Demands First Muslim Congressman Prove He is Not ‘With the Enemy’

Saturday, November 18th, 2006

Thanks to subscriber, Vicki Armstrong, for pointing me to this mind-bending story. MediaMatters reports that Keith Ellison, who won the first Congressional seat ever held by an American Muslim, was interviewed by CNN’s Glen Beck on November 14th. As background, Ellison’s district contains the largest Somali community in the U.S. This community gave him solid voting support.

glen beck keith ellison cnn interviewwmv file (credit: MediaMatters)

But listen to the Islamophobia, barely concealed hysteria and utter ignorance in this colloquy:

BECK:…May we have five minutes here where we’re just politically incorrect and I play the cards face up on the table?

ELLISON: Go there.

BECK: OK. No offense, and I know Muslims. I like Muslims. I’ve been to mosques. I really don’t believe that Islam is a religion of evil. I — you know, I think it’s being hijacked, quite frankly.

With that being said, you are a Democrat. You are saying, “Let’s cut and run.” And I have to tell you, I have been nervous about this interview with you, because what I feel like saying is, “Sir, prove to me that you are not working with our enemies.”

And I know you’re not. I’m not accusing you of being an enemy, but that’s the way I feel, and I think a lot of Americans will feel that way.

It’s truly an astonishing interview for its absurdity. Beck demands that Ellison “prove” that he is “not working with our enemies.” And follows that with “I know you’re not. I’m not accusing of being an enemy.” Well, excuse me–you certainly are accusing him of being “an enemy.”

And since when has being a native born American Muslim meant that you were a member of Al Qaeda or an Islamic extremist? As for Beck’s claim that “a lot of Americans will feel that way,” this is utter rubbish. Only Fox News viewers feel that way and they aren’t even nearly a majority of Americans. As for the Americans who do demand that a member of Congress prove he’s not in cahoots with a foreign enemy, well, Keith Ellison owes them no explanation. The demand is repulsive and beneath his dignity to respond to.

I have to say that Ellison handled Beck deftly and far better than I might’ve. I would’ve jumped down his throat when he said “You are saying ‘Let’s cut and run.’” The congressman waited patiently till Beck had immolated himself on his own hatred and suspicion and then coolly replied:

Well, let me tell you, the people of the Fifth Congressional District know that I have a deep love and affection for my country. There’s no one who is more patriotic than I am. And so, you know, I don’t need to — need to prove my patriotic stripes.

And just in case you might be thinking that Beck couldn’t stoop any lower, he does:

You come from a district that is heavily immigrant with Somalians [sic]. And I think it’s wonderful, honestly, I think it is really a good sign that you are a — you could be an icon to show Europe, this is the way you integrate into a country. I think the Somalians coming out and voting is a very good thing.

I can remember back to the 1960s when white politicians used to try to prove their racial bona fides by saying things like that: “I like Negroes, I know a lot of Negroes, some of ‘em are my friends…” It doesn’t come out sounding any better hearing it 40 years later.

I complained to CNN (you can too) asking whether their journalistic standards permitted their correspondents to demand that elected federal officials prove they are not in league with our nation’s enemies; especially when the journalist, McCarthy-like, presents not a scintilla of evidence that this might be the case. It seems to me that this type of question, whether coming from the right or left, should be treif. We’ll see what and whether they respond.

Performance Optimization WordPress Plugins by W3 EDGE