Muslim and Jewish Women in Nazareth

'We can live in peace'...John Lennon (photo: Dafna Tal)

Mahzor

Mahzor

New York Public Library

Churches

Sarajevo Haggadah

Mah Nishtanah

Sarajevo haggadah

Antaea Darom

Israeli women's art

Action

Torah as music

Ben Heine

Action

ceramic bowl

Mohammad Said Kalash, "Offering Reconciliation" exhibit (photo: Ilan Amihai)

Action

Punch and Judy/Pinchas and Jamila

Avi Katz

Action

David Grossman

Ben Heine

Action

Eldrige Street shul

Lower East Side

Action

Dove

Ben Heine

Action

Two birds

Hoda Jamal

Action

Israeli and Palestinian boys

from documentary, Promises

Action

Cat in the Hat

Yiddish version

Action

Daylight through the Wall

Banksy: graffiti art on Separation Wall

Action

Maurice Sendak's Brundibar set

New Victory Theater (photo: Nan Melville/NYT)

Action

Daniel Barenboim, West-Eastern Divan Orchestra

Palestinian-Israeli musical ensemble (photo: Kerstin Joensson/AP)

Action

Great Day on Eldrige Street

N.Y.'s klezmer greats celebrate shul rededication (photo: Leo Sorel)

Action

Joint Appeal for Peace

(Avi Katz)

Joint Appeal for Peace

Ketubah, Ancona, Italy (1772)

(Jewish Theological Seminary library)

Ancona ketubah

Posts Tagged ‘jodi kantor’

Obama and the Jewish Vote, Doing Just Fine, Thank You

Tuesday, June 3rd, 2008

The NY Times’ Jodi Kantor figuratively wrung her hands recently about Barack Obama’s supposed difficulty in winning over Florida’s alter cocker Jewish vote. It was what I call “anecdotal journalism.” Not the most precise form of news reporting: Aunt Sadie says he’s a Muslim. Uncle Hymie says he’s soft on Israel. There were all sorts of ominous portents for his presidential candidacy: if he can’t win over Jewish voters in the primary what will happen in the general election? Can McCain pull a Reagan and win a substantial portion of the Jewish vote and deprive Obama of a much-needed base of support?

Jerry Haber pointed me to a much needed palliative for those singing the Jewish election blues. This is from CBS News:

According to exit polls conducted in 30 primary states, Jewish Democratic primary voters overall supported Hillary Clinton over Barack Obama – 53 percent chose Clinton compared to 45% who chose Obama.

…Although Jewish Democratic voters favored Clinton in the primaries, Jewish registered voters overall say they would support either Obama or Clinton in a November match-up with McCain. According to CBS News Polls conducted from February to May, both Obama and Clinton would win among Jewish voters nationally by a comfortable margin.

If the candidates were Obama and McCain, the polls show Obama would get 65 percent of the vote of Jewish registered voters to 28 percent for McCain. If the candidates were Clinton and McCain, Clinton would get 68 percent to 26 percent for McCain.

And Jewish registered voters have a more favorable opinion of Obama (61 percent) than they do of Clinton (51 percent), though both are viewed favorably.

In my critique of Kantor’s piece I predicted Obama would get 70-80% of the Jewish vote—right on target for recent Democratic presidential candidates. Given that he already has 65%, I expect that figure will rise substantially once the general election campaign gets underway in earnest, and I expect my prediction will be precisely right. John McCain will be a marginal candidate for most American Jews despite the “enormous lift” Joltin’ Joe Lieberman’s going to give him.

So as you read all the coverage of the annual AIPAC shebang this week and read about the standing ovation McCain got for slamming Obama and the tepid response (maybe even some boos?) Obama will get tomorrow, don’t forget that it means very little.  AIPAC doesn’t represent American Jews.  It represents the American Jewish ‘corporate’ elite.  The corporate elite doesn’t “lead” so much as cheerlead its own narrow set of views and values which aren’t shared by much of the rest of us.  I only regret that Holocaust Hagee will not be delivering the keynote address as he did last year.  It was so much fun to document the lunacy he preached to AIPAC which was received with multiple standing ovations.

AIPAC is like a fun house mirror.  You stand in front of it and watch as your entire body is distorted out of all proportion.  That’s the relation of AIPAC to the real American Jewish body politic.  If AIPAC is a fun house mirror that would make its annual convention a carnival sideshow.

NYT’s Kantor Claims Obama Lacks Support of Jewish Elderly

Wednesday, May 21st, 2008

The N.Y. Times’ Jodi Kantor specializes in a certain kind of soft-focus journalism featuring a warm and fuzzy take on political and social issues, which veers into puffery. She’s written a profile about Barack Obama which wasn’t half-bad. But her latest attempt to feel the pulse of Florida’s elderly Jews and their attitude toward the candidate was very light on research and a poor effort. Let’s count the errors:

…In recent presidential elections, Jews have drifted somewhat to the right.

Just the opposite. In the last three presidential elections Jews drifted even farther toward the Democratic candidates than normal.

John Kerry: 76%
Al Gore: 79%
Bill Clinton: 78%
Michael Dukakis: 64%
Walter Mondale: 67%

There is a Clinton-Republican whisper campaign claiming that the 61% of the Jewish vote Obama would capture if the general election were held today indicates that he will fare worse than previous Democratic candidates. On the contrary, Obama’s share of the Jewish vote will only increase as the Democratic convention looms and the election campaign begins in earnest. Against a conservative Republican like McCain, Obama will gain a 70-80% share of the Jewish vote. Here, Kantor is dead wrong.

Mr. Obama is relatively new on the national stage, his résumé of Senate votes in support of Israel is short, as is his list of high-profile visits to synagogues and delis. So far, his overtures to Jews have been limited; aside from a few speeches and interviews…

Again, this is not so. Obama has recorded a number of significant votes on matters related to Israel and AIPAC has given him a pro-Israel heksher. Obama made several speeches before AIPAC conferences during the campaign so far. He conducted an important teleconference with national Jewish leaders in which he noted that being pro-Israel didn’t necessarily mean supporting Likud positions. He has visited both Israel and the West Bank. His campaign leadership is replete with Jewish fundraisers and staff. He has written movingly both in his books and in speeches of the Black-Jewish bond of brotherhood that informed the civil rights movement and inspired his call to activism. I don’t have a list of the synagogues and delis he’s visited, but I’m sure he’s hit his share.

I really got a kick out of Kantor’s interviewing Alan Dershowitz as if he’s an arbiter of what the alter-cocker set is thinking:

Alan M. Dershowitz…said he had been deluged with questions from Jews about the race, especially about what to think of Mr. Obama. “I have gotten hundreds of e-mails asking me, ‘Who should we vote for?’ ” he said. Mr. Dershowitz, who supports Mrs. Clinton, says he tells voters that Mr. Obama, Mrs. Clinton and Senator John McCain, the presumptive Republican nominee, are all pro-Israel and to reject false personal attacks on Mr. Obama.

Can you imagine the idea of anyone asking the Dersh who to vote for? And can you believe for a second that he has anything good to say behind closed doors about Obama?

Here again Kantor trips up in a major way:

American Jews are by no means uniformly opposed to negotiations with Iran, the leaders of several Jewish groups said, but there is no consensus

Her anonymous Jewish informants misled her (surprise, surprise) and she didn’t bother to do her homework to check if they were right. They’re not. There is a strong Jewish consensus in favor of negotiations with Iran and against military action. According to the most recent American Jewish Committee survey of Jewish opinion 54% reject American military action against Iran (38% approve) and 54% disapprove of Bush Administration policy regarding Iran’s nuclear program. Sounds like a consensus to me.

But not all is bad in Kantor’s story. This interview is especially telling regarding the generation gap between younger and older Jews:

Toting a chaise lounge to Delray Beach on Sunday, Samantha Poznak, 21, said that, like her friends, she would vote for Mr. Obama. As for Jewish leaders, “I never really follow any of those people anyway,” she said from behind dark sunglasses.

“Aunt Claudie will kill you!” hissed her mother, Linda Poznak, 47, who said she would vote for Mr. McCain.

This precisely tracks my own views and an academic paper written by Rutgers sociologist Chaim Waxman who writes that younger Jews reject the elitism and good old boy nature of our leadership:

[There is an] increasing perception [among young Jews] that the communal leadership is elitist, parochial, self-serving, and resistant to innovation and to the active involvement of those who are not members of the “good old boys club,” the circle of wealthy, old men who are at the helms of most major Jewish organizations. At least since the 1960s, younger people in the West have been raised to “question authority” and distrust “the Establishment,” and they now they do so, sometimes adamantly.

Kantor also interviews Joe Lieberman’s stepson, a young New York rabbi. Guess who he’s voting for? I’ll give you one guess, and it ain’t John McCain.

I think Kantor’s trying to raise alarm bells that don’t need to be rung. The Obama campaign right now is pretty much where it should be in the Jewish community. It would be nice if the Jodi Kantors of American journalism could do a better job of getting their facts straight when it comes to reporting on attitudes of our community.