Mahzor

New York Public Library

Churches

Sarajevo Haggadah

Mah Nishtanah

Sarajevo haggadah

Antaea Darom

Israeli women's art

Action

Torah as music

Ben Heine

Action

ceramic bowl

Mohammad Said Kalash, "Offering Reconciliation" exhibit (photo: Ilan Amihai)

Action

Punch and Judy/Pinchas and Jamila

Avi Katz

Action

David Grossman

Ben Heine

Action

Eldrige Street shul

Lower East Side

Action

Dove

Ben Heine

Action

Two birds

Hoda Jamal

Action

Israeli and Palestinian boys

from documentary, Promises

Action

Cat in the Hat

Yiddish version

Action

Daylight through the Wall

Banksy: graffiti art on Separation Wall

Action

Maurice Sendak's Brundibar set

New Victory Theater (photo: Nan Melville/NYT)

Action

Daniel Barenboim, West-Eastern Divan Orchestra

Palestinian-Israeli musical ensemble (photo: Kerstin Joensson/AP)

Action

Great Day on Eldrige Street

N.Y.'s klezmer greats celebrate shul rededication (photo: Leo Sorel)

Action

Joint Appeal for Peace

(Avi Katz)

Joint Appeal for Peace

Ketubah, Ancona, Italy (1772)

(Jewish Theological Seminary library)

Ancona ketubah

Posts Tagged ‘jewish’

Michael Weiss Supports Banning Palestinian, But Not Israeli Jewish Racists

Friday, July 1st, 2011

This is getting to be a habit.  I seem to have gotten under Michael Weiss’ skin.  He takes umbrage with a minor error in my blog post attacking his hysterical coverage of Sheikh Salah’s banning.  I said that his Henry Jackson Society brought Doron Almog via video uplink to speak at a British conference on avoiding Israeli accountability for war crimes.  I did that because a British blogger informed me that this was the case.  It turns out that the the overall conference was sponsored by Dore Gold’s Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs and that the Jackson Society paid for Gold to attend.  Almog, who was featured on a panel together with Gold, appeared thanks to Gold’s group.  Got that?  You can be forgiven for having a bit of trouble following all the permutations of sponsorship.  You go to the conference page and see if you follow it any better than I could.  But that’s it.  That’s the extent of his rebuttal of my claims against him.

So what has he refused to address?  An awful lot it seems.  I’ve noted that while Weiss raves about Sheikh Salah’s alleged anti-Semitic outbursts, he says nary a word about similar anti-Muslim outbursts by Israeli Jewish leaders too numerous to mention including, but not limited to foreign minister Avigdor Lieberman.  I pointedly asked Weiss whether he supported their banning.  Whether he supported the banning of settler extremist and Likud party leader Moshe Feiglin, who actually was banned by a previous Labor government.  Not a word from Weiss on those much more salient, substantive issues.

So let’s challenge him again, Michael, tell us what your specific view is on entry to Britain for Israeli Jewish racists.  What are your criteria to justify banning alleged Palestinian racists and are there any Israeli Jews who would justify banning?  Do you support the banning of Feiglin?  Lieberman?  Rabbis Dov Lior or Dov Wolpe, who are the Jewish “spiritual” equivalents of Salah’s supposed anti-Semitic views?  By the way, Michael, if you know Hebrew, which is doubtful, you should read this Haaretz article about Lior which notes that while he publicly supports the murder of Palestinian children, Salah does not support the murder of Israeli Jews.

Weiss also rewrites history I’m afraid, about our past when he was an editor at the ill-fated online magazine, Jewcy.  What actually happened, as opposed to what Weiss claims, is that he invited me to transfer my blog to Jewcy, which was a big move for me to consider since it meant my blog would essentially be owned by Jewcy as I understood it.  I told him initially that I was interested.  He said he would send me a contract to review.  And then I waited, and waited, and waited.  And I called him a few times asking in a friendly way what was going on.  He always replied that things were in the works and I’d receive the contract shortly.  But it never came.

Then, after two months or so of waiting, the Gaza war intervened.  In looking through the Jewcy site, I noticed 20 posts or so addressing the war in various guises.  I counted two posts that could be construed to be even remotely critical.  Weiss only refers to one writer, Adam LeBor, as offering this view.  There was probably at least one other.  So I began to think of what I would represent in such a mix of right-wing pro-Israel coverage.  At that time, I didn’t know Weiss to be the spiteful, mean-spirited egotistical fellow I now know.  So I called him in an attempt to ask forthright, candid questions about the editorial content and direction of Jewcy.

Eventually, he became so angry he told me to take a hike in an incredibly vicious, vitriolic fashion.  Which was fine with me.  In fact he did me a favor.  Within a week or so of Weiss’ banishment, came news that pro-Israel neocon Michael Steinhardt and the other money-bags behind the venture were pulling the plug.  Then Weiss himself was out of a job.  It seems to have stopped his U.S. literary career in its tracks as he made his way subsequently to England, where he’s become the toast of the tawdry tabloid circuit with his Telegraph blog.

Jewcy’s imminent demise was likely the real reason he never sent the contract.  But, as he seems to prefer opacity over transparency, he didn’t want to let me know the website was about to go belly up and they couldn’t have paid me if they’d wanted.

Among Weiss’ other vain attempts to demean me he talks nonsense of a long night of the soul regarding whether I should move my blog to Jewcy.  To which, all I can say is that at least I have a soul.  Where his should be there’s an empty place filled with hollow words and silver-tongued vitriol.

I wonder why Weiss never told his readers at Harry’s Place about Jewcy’s demise and the real reason he refused to send that contract?

While you’re there take a look at the comment thread and note the high level of discourse there including pathetic ad hominem attacks on my physical appearance.  It’s makes the threads here look like the Oxford debating union.

Israeli MK: ‘No to Spencer Tunick and the Sodomites!’

Friday, May 13th, 2011


Spencer Tunick has set his sights on organizing another one of his mass nude photo shoots, this time in Israel at the Dead Sea (Hebrew).  It will be called, fittingly enough, Naked Sea.

But not if far-right MK Zvulun Orlev has anything to say about it.  He’s written to the attorney general demanding that such an outrage against public decency be halted immediately.  Apparently, Orlev has forgotten whatever Humash he was taught in yeshiva as a boy, which would’ve reminded him that the vicinity of the Dead Sea, site of the ancient cities of Sodom and Gomorrah, would be a perfect venue for the Tunick project.  Orlev sputters with rage about the offense to public decency and then says:

We’re talking about the culture of Sodom and Gomorrah!

Indeed we are.  Orlev also makes a questionable claim that the authorities would prohibit any artistic display in a public setting which would involve nudity.  I guess that rules out displaying all those wonderful fleshy Titian, Rubens and Caravaggio nudes on the streets of Bnai Brak.  Alas.  The yeshiva bochers won’t know what they’re missing.

Apparently lost on the Jewish puritans and prudes is the fact that the photography project would be a tremendous boost to Israeli tourism and the Dead Sea region, which is under severe environemental threat.  Orlev must think he can make up for such a boost with the scores of tzniusdike Jews who will flock to the Holy Land when they hear that Jewish chastity has been protected by the righteous MK.

Visit the Naked Sea link above if you’d like to support the fundraising for this artistic project and say “Nyeh, nyeh” to all the Orlevs of this world. H/t Dena Shunra.

The ‘Herem’ of Judge Goldstone

Sunday, April 10th, 2011
richard goldstone

Richard Goldstone: the Haggadah's 'Wicked Son'

Last year, Judge Richard Goldstone revealed that he would not attend his grandson’s South African bar mitzvah because pro-Israel community leaders had let it be known that they would picket the synagogue during the celebration and generally make his life miserable.  There was a general uproar over this threatening behavior with a number of South African Jews (though not the community’s top leaders) criticizing it in the media including the New York Times.  A short time later, Goldstone announced that he would attend the festivities after all and it appeared that the community had backed down and that the judge’s honor had been vindicated.

What we didn’t realize, and which The Forward recently reported, is that there seems to have been a secret quid pro quo by which the community demanded that it meet with Goldstone privately as the price for quiet during the bar mitzvah celebration.  Judge Goldstone attended a community pow-wow with rabbis and the communal political leadership.  Until now, no one knew what was discussed and what was said to Goldstone.  Now, I can report on at least one of the speeches he was forced to endure.  It is a masterpiece of Jewish guilt.  Baruch Spinoza was subjected to no less during the proceedings of the Amsterdam Jewish community which led to his excommunication (herem).  In fact, the source who provided it to me called it a piece psychological manipulation, in other words part of a communal propaganda offensive designed to intimidate Goldstone into the position he recently adopted in his Washington Post op-ed, in which he uncharacteristically withdrew several key claims of the UN report which he helped author.  The performance in that piece was dreary beyond belief and has to be a low in an otherwise distinguished legal career.

Perhaps the most radical philosophical turnaround in the op-ed is that before, he emphatically rejected the notion that the IDF and State could adequately and fairly investigate their own possible misdeeds.  Now, he claims that Israel has done precisely that.  And makes this claim in the face of evidence which shows that the investigations have been half-hearted and resulted in no significant meting out of punishment or even discipline.

No one can say whether there was an explicit quid pro quo involved in his penning this column.  But it can be no accident that Israel’s Interior Minister, Eli Yishai, has invited Goldstone for a triumphal return to Israel and that the latter has accepted.  It may also not be an accident that he published his apologia in one of Israel’s favorite American newspapers, one which consistently, forcefully advocates Israel’s interests in its editorial pages.

Here is the address of a South African Sephardic rabbi, Laurence (Doron) Perez, to Goldstone during the May, 2010 meeting:

Justice Goldstone -

I am sure that you have had the opportunity many times both as a father and grandfather to be present with your family at the Pesach Seder. I am also sure that you are familiar with the basic narrative of the Haggadah which, as we know, describes the story of Jewish slavery, freedom and redemption. I would like to draw your attention to the famous paragraph about the four sons – the wise one, the wayward [ed. a deliberate distortion of the Hebrew, in which he is called "the wicked son"] one, the simple one and the one who does not know how to ask.  I would like to reflect for a moment on the narrative regarding the wayward son which I believe to be relevant to our discussion today.

The Haggadah states as follows

“The wayward son asks – What is this service to you? (Exodus 12;26). By saying “you” he excludes himself. And since he excludes himself from the peoplehood of Israel (KIal Yisrael), he has denied a fundamental principle of our faith (Kofer be-Ikar). You in turn should blunt his teeth (give a sharp and blunt answer) and say to him – because of what Hashem did for me when I left Egypt, I do this  (Exodus 13;8) – implying for me but not for him.  If he (the wayward son) had been there (in Egypt), he would not have been redeemed?”

This paragraph is most telling as to who the wayward Jewish son is and, further, what our response to him should be. The Haggadah describes the wayward son as the one who sets himself apart from Jewish peoplehood and places himself outside the mainstream Jewish community. His question “what is this service to you” implies that the service does not obligate him in any way. Issues of Jewish identity: – our collective fate, destiny and responsibilities are seen as something which have no bearing on his world view. So much so, that the Haggadah uses the sharp terminology since he has excluded himself from the Jewish people, he has denied a fundamental tenet of Jewish faith.

Again, as I wrote above, the rabbi is essentially warning Goldstone that his participation in the Gaza war investigation and the findings he endorsed in it, have caused him to be driven him from the Tabernacle, leaving him to wander in the desert bereft of his fellow Jews.  They in turn told him that due to his abandonment of them, they have ostracized him.

The rabbi continues in a vein that accuses Goldstone of concern only for the suffering of the Palestinian people and of his disregard for the suffering of Israelis that led up to Operation Cast Lead.  Perez tells Goldstone that when Jewish suffering conflicts with Palestinian suffering there is only ONE legitimate choice:

Remarkably, what emanates so succinctly from the Haggadah is the supreme importance of Jewish peoplehood. The community ethic is a core component of Jewish identity. One cannot call oneself a good Jew if one distances oneself from the lot of one’s People and community.

This explains a bewildering question regarding the wayward son – why is he at the Pesach table in the first place? After all, if he is so wicked, why does he want to be part of the Jewish experience? The answer is clear – he does want to have a connection to his Judaism – but he wants this to be without any commitment to and embracing of a collective Jewish fate and destiny. But the Haggadah teaches us that he cannot claim to be a good Jew, whilst at the same time separating himself from the pain and suffering of his own People. Of course, every good Jew must be sensitive to the suffering of all human beings. All are created in the image of G-d. This is without question a core Jewish value. But how can this possibly override the suffering of his own family, community and People? Kindness and charity must never end in the home, but they must most certainly begin there! Indeed, this is a fundamental principle of Jewish faith – the inextricable link between Jewish faith and the People of Israel.

…The answer given to the wayward son in the Haggadah is also most telling. We blunt his sharp criticism by highlighting the following important point – “Had you been in Egypt you would not have been redeemed” i.e. the wayward son needs to decide what side of Jewish History he is on. If his worldview does not contain this deep sense of Jewish peoplehood, then he has missed the point of Jewish identity. Our Sages tell us that many Jews chose not to leave Egypt but rather lost themselves during the plague of darkness. These individual Jews could not come to terms with Moses’ vision of redemption from Egyptian society: to journey to the homeland of their forefathers and to exercise their divine, religious, historical and moral right to self-determination in their G-d given Land. Those who left Egypt committed to this vision of Jewish destiny. Those who chose to rather stay behind in Egypt did not accept this narrative of Jewish history.

In the following passage, Rabbi Perez goes even farther and accuses Goldstone of being almost a traitor to his race by siding with the Palestinians.  Goldstone has, in effect, turned his back on a millennium of Jewish suffering through his advocacy of the UN human rights report.  He sentences Goldstone to oblivion for his actions:

Remaining behind in Egypt and perhaps even prioritizing the suffering of the Egyptians over the tears and pain of over 100 years of slavery and death of their own People at the hand of the Egyptians sidelined them from future Jewish destiny. Instead of becoming influential protagonists of Jewish history, they became a peripheral footnote.

Below, Perez commits a major bit of intellectual mendacity by claiming that Jewish interests and universal justice are consonant when everything he has said above denies it.  Unless of course the rabbi is arguing that the rights of Palestinians, such as they are, are not covered by the terms universal justice or human rights.

In conclusion – there need not be any contradiction between striving for human rights and universal justice and at the same time being loyal to one’s Faith, People and Land. One can be a champion of human rights and at the same time believe in the unbreakable link between the Jewish faith, Land and People of Israel.

Our Rabbis taught us never to give up on any fellow Jew – even when misguided.  After all, it is his actions we assess and never the person himself. We hope and pray that you undo the unfortunate and enormous damage that your report has done to the Jewish people in general and to the State of Israel and her heroic and moral defenders in particular.

Justice Goldstone – the simple question that we all need to ask ourselves is; which side of Jewish history are we on?

What is truly tragic about Judge Goldstone’s turnaround is that he has now embraced his people, but turned his back on an entire career of advocacy on behalf of peoples afflicted by genocide and egregious violations of human and national rights.  Unlike Rabbi Perez and Judge Goldstone, I do believe that universal human rights and Jewish values are not antithetical.  And unlike them, I do not believe that Israel’s behavior in maintaining the Occupation meets standards of Jewish or universal human rights.  You can have it both ways, but only if you understand that Israeli values are not necessarily kosher Jewish values in this case.

Many of us Jews who have political, philosophical or ethical beliefs that diverge from the so-called consensus have experienced this sort of herem.  I call it the Spinoza Society to denote those honored Jews who break from the pack to stand for values that should the mainstream but often aren’t.  Unfortunately, Judge Goldstone craves the acceptance of the Jewish greybeards and mandarins.  Others of us have known what it is like to have to endure this sort of treatment in order to uphold our own Jewish values.  Thankfully, many of us haven’t felt the need to cave to the pressure.  Perhaps we have less at stake than he does.  But I’d like to think that a man as eminent as Judge Goldstone should’ve done a better job of upholding these values, even in the face of the relentless pressure he undoubtedly faced.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Bibi Set to Name Amidror National Security Advisor

Friday, March 4th, 2011
yaakov amidror

National security advisor candidate, Yaakov Amidror (Maya Levin/JINI

No sooner did the Bibi-Yvet show give us the public defenestration of Uzi Arad, whose appointment to be Israel’s next ambassador to Britain was confirmed and rejected all in leaked news stories within a single week, than Bibi has given us an even better show.  While Arad was the real thing, a genuine Mossad spy who’d run spies and been instrumental in the Rosen-Aipac spy episode, Amidror seems a parody of Dr. Strangelove; a Maj. Gen. who’s never had a field command, and who sees the troops as little more than ideological cannon fodder.

Peace Now’s Ori Nir calls him an “ultra-hawk” and “National-Religious icon.”  It’s hard to believe that anyone can be worse than Arad, but Amidror really and undoubtedly is:

Amidror…told a conference last year that soldiers should kill anyone who gets in the way of completing their mission – and that soldiers who refuse to attack should be shot, too.

“A soldier who won’t attack when they tell him ‘forward’ because he says, ‘Two soldiers to my right and two to my left have been killed, so I won’t move’ – any normal military system should put a bullet in his head, and a liberal system should put him in jail,” Amidror said, speaking at a conference organized by the Israel Democracy Institute on “National Values in the Israel Defense Forces.”

“The education we give soldiers is an education of risking or being willing to sacrifice one’s life … of knowing that some of the soldiers won’t return, but still, everyone goes. And anyone who doesn’t go should get a bullet in the head or be in jail.”

…When journalist Haim Yavin, a fellow panelist, noted the army’s orders during the first Lebanon war were to “fight carefully,” Amidror responded: “That’s a totally illegal order. What should be said is ‘kill more of the bastards on the other side, so that we’ll win.’ Period.”

He also criticized the IDF code of ethics drafted by Prof. Asa Kasher. “I said this should remain unwritten, so there wouldn’t be anything written, as [then] it would become technical,” Amidror said.

…Yesterday Amidror…told Haaretz that in some countries soldiers who won’t attack are executed…

This guy would’ve been right at home at the Wansee Conference.  You’ll recall that’s where the Nazis devised the Final Solution, while writing down almost none of their plans because they were wise enough to understand that if they did and anyone found out about it they’d be in mighty hot water.  To be clear, I’m not accusing Amidror of planning a genocide against anyone (expect perhaps Arabs or Palestinians if given half a chance).  But I’m noting an absolute similarity of thought and mindset.

As Bibi prepares for his ersatz peace offensive, let the world keep in mind that his incoming top security advisor said the following about the peace process:

Earlier this month, Amidror wrote that “negotiations with the Palestinians and even an agreement with the Palestinians (…) will not benefit Israel in any way…

Ori also notes the ultra-hawk’s “vicious attacks on the New Israel Fund.”  He has derided the Obama administration’s “naive” policies.  Politically, he was the public face of the far-right religious, Jewish Home party.  He’s not just a settler, but a supporter of the most radical and messianic among them.  He believes, in other words, that Israeli sovereignty over the entire greater Land of Israel will hasten the coming of the messiah.

Amidror espouses a stridently anti-Arab strategic doctrine which attributes annihilationist views to all Muslism and Arabs.  Further, his own views are completely out of touch with the developments of the Arab democratic revolutions sweeping the Middle East:

His approach to Israel’s national security attributes little value to political accords between Israel and its neighbors. In Amidror’s view, Israel’s chief national security asset in its relations with its neighbors is deterrence…Amidror wrote that…the Arab world “does not accept the very presence of a sovereign and independent Jewish state in the heart of the Middle East and will do its best to annihilate it.” Any other basic assumption, Amidror wrote, is “self deception.” Amidror repeated…that Israel’s goal should not be to change the minds and hearts of its Arab neighbors – such attempts would be in vain – but to deter them by force. “The processes taking place in the Middle East are leading it toward becoming more fundamentalist, less tolerant and less democratic.”

…[In his recent essay] The Chief Lesson – Security is Preferable to Peace…Amidror argues that because Israel lives “on the edge of a volcano,” it must always be ready for the worse. “The main lesson is that we must emphasize Israel’s security needs and its ability to defend itself over any other requirement, including the lofty dream to reach political agreements [with its neighbors].

This guy is a troglodyte.  A Curtis LeMay.  A Gen. Jack D. Ripper.  Is this what Israel and the Middle East needs right now?  An ideological flamethrower who wants to cast oil on the fire that is the Israeli-Arab conflict?

Clearly, it seems that Amidror’s appointment is meant to be red meat to those coalition partners farther to his right (yes, there are, I know it’s hard to believe).  Perhaps Bibi means for the arm-chair general to be little more than a figure-head with no influence over policy.  But the guy scares me and should scare anyone who has even a scintilla of faith that the conflict can and should be settled sometime by someone.

David Yerushalmi, Islam-Hating White Supremacist Inspires Anti-Sharia Bills Sweeping Tea Party Nation

Wednesday, March 2nd, 2011

david yerushalmi

David Yerushalmi


You’ve gotta hand it to David Yerushalmi.  Until now, I can’t recall a Jew who’s ever been called a white supremacist before (actually now that I think of it, I called him a Jewish white supremacist way back in 2007).  Thanks to him, we now can.  They said that one of the virtues of Zionism was that now Israel could have Jewish criminals.  I guess the same holds true for Jewish racists.  Thanks to Dovid Yerushalmi Jews are really breaking new ground.

I’m referring to an eye-opening expose in Mother Jones about the inspiration the Jewish extremist is offering for the anti-Muslim legal initiatives that are sweeping the south after the victory of one such campaign in Oklahoma a few months ago.  Now Tennessee stands ready to draw the line at Muslim infidels thrusting their scimitars into the private parts of Christian maidens.  The legislature there is considering a bill which would ban the use of foreign legal systems like Sharia in the adjudication of any legal matters within the state.  So far, I haven’t seen any Tennesseans clamoring to apply Sharia to the laws governing horse-racing at Churchill Downs.  But that doesn’t deter Yerushalmi, who has projects like this cooking in several other southern Tea Party strongholds.

One of the most delicious phrases used to describe the Jewish anti-jihadi is “white supremacist,” to which I say: if the shoe fits…I’ve also called him a Jewish fascist.  But white supremacist will do just as well.

As Murphy notes, this is a guy who endorses the principle that “Caucasians” are superior to blacks and that Jewish liberals are a cancer in the U.S. body politic.  The nearest Jewish “intellectual” antecedent I can determine would be Meir Kahane.  But Yerushalmi’s views are far more radical than Kahane’s.  The only difference is that Kahane embraced violence as a tool in his campaign against Arabs and anti-Semites.  The latter-day Jewish Islamophobe, an attorney, is far too slick for that.  He merely suggests that all non-citizen Muslims in the country be deported and many of the rest thrown in concentration camps.  In Yerushalmi-world, any Muslim who espoused Sharia would earn him or herself a 20 year stay in the federal pen.  Why would you need violence when you can throw the entire weight of the federal government into criminalizing merely being a Muslim?

I wouldn’t at all be surprised if Yerushalmi, a fedora-totin’, tzitis-wearing ultra-Orthodox Jew, was an avid supporter of the settler movement, the Israeli equivalent of the Tea Party with Uzis.

David Yerushalmi is the nasty, sleazy side of the more refined Muslim-bashing proposed by Rep. Peter King, who plans on quizzing Muslim-Americans about their nasty un-American habits in Congressional hearings soon.  The former is Roy Cohn, to King’s Joe McCarthy.  Can you imagine white Christian Congress members summoning American Jews to defend their Americanism in public hearings?  It’s preposterous, nauseating.

And just think, if Mike Huckabee gets the Republican nomination, we’ll have a settler-loving presidential candidate espousing such a foul, racist agenda.

Settlers Call for Palestinian Expulsion, Palestinians Call for Jewish Expulsion

Friday, February 25th, 2011
palestinian expulsion ad

Aryeh Eldad's radical settler proposal to expel Palestinians to Jordan

In a game of tit for tat, battling Israeli Jewish and Palestinian groups have called for forced expulsion of their opposite number from their native lands.  Aryeh Eldad, a radical settler leader and Israeli MK has published an ad in Haaretz which calls for Jordan’s King Abdullah to accept the millions of Palestinians living within Israel and the Occupied Territories to be expelled to Jordan, their “rightful home” (according to Eldad).  Though according to whose ‘right’ it’s not clear.

Likewise, a radical Palestinian group has called for the forced expulsion of all Israeli Jews from their own native land, Israel, to the lands of their forefathers in Europe and the far-flung Jewish Diaspora.  This seems only fitting if one side is going to advocate forcibly expelling the other that the opposing side do the same.  That way, no one would remain in the land and it could then be settled by a yet a third people (perhaps the Jebusites, Moabites, Emorites or another tribe exterminated by the ancient Israelites during their habitation of the land) looking for a land without a people for a people without a land.

In all seriousness and with sadness, I report that the first paragraph is truthful, while the second is fiction.  It is true that some pro-Palestinian activists advocate Jews leaving Israel, but they’re hard to take seriously.  However, the settler advocacy for Palestinian expulsion has been seriously advocated by prominent figures in the Israeli political right and center (Benny Morris among them) for decades.  As recently as 1989, Bibi Netanyahu himself publicly advocated this view, though he’s much too slick these days to ‘fess up to his original sin.  Polls have found that 40% of more of Israelis view transfer as an attractive solution to the “Palestinian problem.”  In short, racism is alive and well on the Israeli far-right, which has basically become the Israeli center as the former center has disintegrated.

An interesting sidebar: the Roman destruction of the Second Temple is called the Hurban (a Hebrew term for “destruction” on a cataclysmic scale) because it led to the end of Jewish sovereignty in Israel and the scattering of Jews to the winds in the Diaspora.  Similarly, the 1948 Palestinian expulsion from the land is called the Nakba (or “catastrophe”).  One of the themes of this blog is to show each people that the other has mirrored their experience, history, and suffering, in an attempt to compel mutual recognition and empathy.  Perhaps neither will be able to acknowledge these parallels for some time, but eventually they will.  That is why I like Dr. Izzeldin Abuelaish’s characterization of the Israeli Jewish and Palestinian peoples as “conjoined twins who will live together or die together.”  We may not be ‘One’ as the old UJA slogan used to hold, but “we are all together” as the Beatles once sang.

Dagan’s Holocaust: A Monster That Will Not Die

Sunday, January 9th, 2011
dagan's grandfather holocaust victim

Image claimed to be that of Rabbi Dov Ehrlich z"l, Meir Dagan's grandfather, which hangs in his Mossad office

I wrote last night about Meir Dagan’s famous office photo, ostensibly showing his grandfather on bended knee wrapped in his tallis before what appear to be German or Polish soldiers or police, one of whom wields a billy club.  Dagan claims, according to Ronen Bergman and this Ynet story (thanks to IlanP for drawing my attention to it), that the photo was taken moments before his father was shot.  Dagan uses the picture as a prop in his motivational speeches to Mossad operatives before they embark on important covert missions:

“Look at this photograph,” Dagan tells the Caesarea fighters. “This is what must guide us and lead us to act on behalf of the State of Israel. I look at the picture and vow that I will do everything I can to ensure that something like this will never happen again.”

In yesterday’s post I wrote about my disquiet at this use of such past personal family tragedy to justify Israel’s current political agenda.  I have some further thoughts on this subject because the image and way Dagan uses/exploits it still bother me.

First, let me say that the Holocaust is undoubtedly a singular trauma in Jewish history and one that has left an indelible mark on all Jews, certainly today and likely for all time.  There can be no doubt that survivors and descendants of survivors each have to find a way through the pain of this experience.  In most cases, I refuse to judge the ways in which victims and those related to them (several great uncles and aunts of mine perished in the Holocaust though I never knew them) do this.  But in the case of those who exploit the Holocaust for political or nationalist purposes, I draw the line.

Dagan, like Israel itself, treats the Holocaust not just as a historical event, but as one that continues to happen or threatens to happen to Israel today.  Dagan’s enemies (and those of the State of Israel) are no different than the Cossacks, Nazis and Inquisitors who’ve inflicted pain on Jews throughout our history.  The genocide perpetrated on our people during World War II is the same genocide that our current enemies (in Gaza or Iran) would inflict on us given half a chance.

Whatever one thinks of this psychological profile, one has to admit that it is a powerful one.  One that roots itself indelibly in one’s identity and provides basic, rock-solid principles to carry one through life.  It is how Dagan can be such a focussed, monomaniacal advocate (or killer) on behalf of his people.

But really when you look at this set of beliefs, it is pathological.  It views the Holocaust as an event that happened but never ended.  It views every possible threat to the Jewish people as a looming Holocaust.  It sanctions grievous acts against our fellow human beings in order to protect us from these imagined dangers.

Here is the illness: the conditions and context in which Israel finds itself now have nothing to with the Holocaust.  It has everything to do with where Israel finds itself in the contemporary Middle East.  It has to do with the precise set of Arab neighbor states it has and their own political conditions.  Israel must come to terms with the real conditions in which it finds itself, and not imagined historical ones which are irrelevant to latter-day circumstances.

If your policies are governed by historical trauma instead of clear-eyed analysis of where you find yourself at the present moment, you are doomed.  You will be fighting the battles of 1938 instead of 2011.

The final grave disservice that the Holocaust-obsessed do to contemporary Israel is that they turn today’s enemies into eternal sworn genocidal monsters (i.e. Amalek).  You cannot negotiate with a monster.  You cannot make peace with a monster.  Nazis were monsters.  But Palestinians are not monsters.  Iranians are not monsters.  Neither people seek to annihilate the Jewish people as the Nazis did.  Perhaps in their wildest dreams the most extreme among them might harbor such delusions.  But rational human beings do not act based on what the most lunatic human beings do or say.  They act out of pragmatic self-interest.

We must not let the Bibi Netanyahus or Meir Dagans turn the Israeli-Arab conflict into the Holocaust.  This is not a Holy War nor a Crusade nor a fight to prevent the annihilation of the Jewish people (or even Israel).  This is a political struggle over land and power.  Political conflicts can be resolved.  Existential conflicts between good and evil cannot.  For the Dagans of this world it is a fight to the death between Israel and its enemies.  We must not allow it to become that, because that way lie death and self-destruction.

Democratic Congresswoman Severely Wounded, Chief Federal Judge Murdered in Arizona Rampage

Saturday, January 8th, 2011

Gbrielle Giffords with her astronaut husband, Mark Kelly, at happier times (NY Times)

Horrible news today of a shooting rampage in Tuscon, AZ in which a troubled 20 year-old with vague political motives shot and killed six, including chief federal judge, John Roll and severely wounded Cong. Gabrielle Giffords, a centrist Democrat, who was shot in the brain.  Her doctors say she will survive, but they have no idea what level of brain damage there might be.

From news reports quoting the rabbi who married her, it appears Giffords is Jewish.  It’s not yet known whether there were anti-Semitic motives to the attack.  Though the fact that he killed seemingly at random might preclue that theory.

Ironically, in order to be elected in Republican-leaning district, she had to embrace gun rights.  But she voted in favor of the health care bill and opposed Arizona’s draconian laws criminalizing being an immigrant there.  At an earlier similar constituent meeting police arrested a man who was armed with a pistol.  Giffords had received death threats, as had the federal judge.

During the recent Congressional campaign, Sarah Palin’s website featured Congressional districts represented by Democrats along with a bulls-eye targeting them.  The bulls-eyes, for some reason, were later removed.  In fact, the Congresswoman had this to say about being targeted:

…Giffords said last week in an interview:   “We’re on Sarah Palin’s targeted list, but the thing is that the way she has it depicted has the crosshairs of a gun sight over our district.   When people do that, they have to realize that there are consequences to that action.”

jared loughner's gun

From Jared Loughner's MySpace page

The killer, Jason Loughner, is 20 years old.  Somehow he appears to have procured a semiautomatic weapon for his killing spree.  His political views are rambling, incoherent, profoundly alienated and violent, though a friend who hadn’t seen him in seven years tweeted that when she knew him his views were quite left-wing.  They must’ve changed in the interim, as he lists Mein Kampf as one of his favorite books (along with the Communist Manifesto, go figure).

Many Democrats are blaming Tea Party rhetoric for the violent tone of political discourse in the country.  But the killer’s motivations appear confused.  It should be said though that many of his general views echo those of the Tea Party.

Arizona also seems to be a place that encourages the sort of hatred that must’ve fueled this carnage.  Today’s NY Times carries a story about the Repubican attorney general who railroaded a measure through the legislature that essentially criminalizes Chicano ethnic studies programs, which it defines thus:

The Arizona law warns school districts that they stand to lose 10 percent of their state education funds if their ethnic-studies programs are found not to comply with new state standards. Programs that promote the overthrow of the United States government are explicitly banned, and that includes the suggestion that portions of the Southwest that were once part of Mexico should be returned to that country.

Also prohibited is any promotion of resentment toward a race. Programs that are primarily for one race or that advocate ethnic solidarity instead of individuality are also outlawed.

On Monday, his final day as the state’s top education official, Mr. Horne declared that Tucson’s Mexican-American program violated all four provisions. The law gives the district 60 days to comply, although Mr. Horne offered only one remedy: the dissolution of the program.

Here’s more vintage Tom Horne (the attorney general):

“It’s propagandizing and brainwashing that’s going on there [in the Chicano Studies program]…Once they get told day after day that they are being victimized, they become angry and resentful….

“They are the ‘Bull Connors.’ They are the ones resegregating.”

If punishing ethnic identity is the prevailing norm in Arizona politics is it any wonder that some lunatic might get it into his head that those who support immigrants or identity with their cause might be so damaging to the republic that they should be eliminated?  No, Tom Horne didn’t kill John Roll nor did he put a bullet in Congresswomen Giffords brain.  But words matter and laws do too.  If you attempt to score political points on the backs of ethnic minorities and do so largely because they have the least power in society to stand up to your bullying, then you’ve created the environment that produces the Jason Loughners of the world.  And yes, that means Sarah Palin and the Tea Party too.  They’re less culpable, but a contributing factor nonetheless.

The county sheriff commented on the type of rhetoric that may’ve motivated Loughner to act:

The Sheriff of Pima County, Clarence Dupnick,  today said this:   “When you look at unbalanced people, how they respond to the vitriol that comes out of certain mouths about tearing down the government.   The anger, the hatred, the bigotry that goes on in this country is outrageous.”

By the way, Horne didn’t outlaw ethnic studies programs for African-Americans, Asians or Native Americans.  Those are apparently kosher; or else he’s worried he would bruise far more entrenched interests if he took them on.

I hate to be morbid but the only way the U.S. may get real national gun control is having a few other nutheads take potshots at other Congressmembers.  There’s nothing like self-preservation to change a person’s political views radically.  Or perhaps we should ask the NRA to provide protection for all members of Congress and the federal judiciary?

Again, I hate to be morbid but would anyone like to make a wager on whether the Arizona Republican Party and its Tea Party supporters are relishing the possibility they may get an opportunity to replace Giffords, should she not be able to resume her seat, with one of their kind?