Mahzor

New York Public Library

Churches

Sarajevo Haggadah

Mah Nishtanah

Sarajevo haggadah

Antaea Darom

Israeli women's art

Action

Torah as music

Ben Heine

Action

ceramic bowl

Mohammad Said Kalash, "Offering Reconciliation" exhibit (photo: Ilan Amihai)

Action

Punch and Judy/Pinchas and Jamila

Avi Katz

Action

David Grossman

Ben Heine

Action

Eldrige Street shul

Lower East Side

Action

Dove

Ben Heine

Action

Two birds

Hoda Jamal

Action

Israeli and Palestinian boys

from documentary, Promises

Action

Cat in the Hat

Yiddish version

Action

Daylight through the Wall

Banksy: graffiti art on Separation Wall

Action

Maurice Sendak's Brundibar set

New Victory Theater (photo: Nan Melville/NYT)

Action

Daniel Barenboim, West-Eastern Divan Orchestra

Palestinian-Israeli musical ensemble (photo: Kerstin Joensson/AP)

Action

Great Day on Eldrige Street

N.Y.'s klezmer greats celebrate shul rededication (photo: Leo Sorel)

Action

Joint Appeal for Peace

(Avi Katz)

Joint Appeal for Peace

Ketubah, Ancona, Italy (1772)

(Jewish Theological Seminary library)

Ancona ketubah

Posts Tagged ‘israeli elections’

Can Amir Peretz Win?

Thursday, December 1st, 2005

Dan Ben Simon, a senior political columnist for Israel’s Haaretz, has written an extremely upbeat assessment of Amir Peretz’s chances of winning the upcoming Knesset election. It is featured at the Israel Policy Forum website. Ben Simon isn’t just talking about Peretz improving Labor’s showing in the next Knesset, he’s saying he thinks Peretz can poll more votes than Sharon’s Kadima.

Considering Israel’s media coverage yesterday of polls indicating that Peres’ jump to Kadima may push new voters Sharon’s way, Ben Simon is being extremely optimistic. But hey, there’s far too much pessimism going around the Middle East right about now and I like a man who bucks the trend. As for me, I think the media made too much of the poll in Sharon’s favor and I think Ben Simon may be speaking more from his heart than his head regarding Peretz’s chances. So I come down somewhere in between. The race will be a close one and perhaps a few seats will separate Kadima and Labor.

The unknown for me is how a political firebrand like Peretz will fit in a coalition with Ariel Sharon. They seem the oddest of odd couples.

Ben Simon has also written a scathing post mortem on Peres’ jumping ship for Haaretz:

But the simple folk [i.e. Israeli voters], those who have it tough, those with morals and a conscience who truly have the good of the country at the forefront of their concerns, have always seen him as an incorrigible opportunist, a politician lacking in qualities, a power-hungry individual who became addicted to the pleasures of the government.

And this is the reason they humiliated him time and again. Every time he ran for office, the voters pushed him away from the centers of national responsibility. Because they knew, with their sharp senses, that this is a man who has no God other than his personal good…

One cannot avoid coming to the conclusion that the reason Peres left his political home is the reason voiced by his brother, Gershon, another renowned philosopher [!]. There is no escaping the conclusion that evil and ugly motives were behind the decision to jump ship – not ideology or anything else like that. Amir Peretz is simply not “one of us.” He is “different” and he looks “different.”

A chapter in the Labor movement has been closed. The eternal leader who came across as an electoral barrier to large segments of the public has upped and left. Now, he has become Ariel Sharon’s problem.

Peres Expected to Abandon Labor

Wednesday, November 30th, 2005
Shimon PeresPosing with FC Barcelona soccer shirt before game against Israeli team: traitor to his Party, traitor to his team? (credit: AP)

Shimon Peres has done just about everything he can to telegraph he’s leaving the Israeli Labor Party for Ariel Sharon’s new Kadima except making the actual announcement. First, there were the hours of meetings with Sharon shortly after his defeat in the Labor leadership primary. In the past day or so, Peres’ chief Labor ally, Dahlia Itzik bolted Labor for Kadima. Then, Peres’ brother, Gigi, made repulsive racist comments on Israeli radio about Amir Peretz’s North African ethnicity:

“Peretz and his people are a foreign body in the Labor Party, like General Franco in Spain,” Gershon (Gigi) Peres told Army Radio in an interview.

“They were the Falangists who came from southern Spain,” Peres continued, who came to infiltrate as a fifth column into Madrid, and destroyed the magnificent republic.”

Referring to Peretz’ former Knesset faction, Gigi Peres said “This game is entirely clear – the One Nation people came from North Africa, took over, and shot them in the back.”

Whether or not Shimon Peres approved his brother’s comments matters very little. The fact that someone so close to him mounted such an offensive attack on Peretz certainly indicates that the Peres family (including the political scion) is not terribly happy with the Party’s new leader.

Then Peres made this statement of praise for Sharon:

“The real change is not in the Labor Party. The real change is in the Likud Party [i.e. in Sharon leaving Likud],” Peres said Tuesday in Barcelona. “Mr. Sharon took a different direction for a Palestinian state. He wants to continue the peace process.”

We won’t have long to wait for the other shoe to drop and for Peres to hightail it out of Labor.

According to Haaretz, rumors have it Peres will not run as an MK candidate on the Kadima list. Rather, he will become a super ambassador for the peace process:

Sharon may offer Peres a future position as effective “special ambassador for peace affairs” in future negotiations with Arabs. Were Sharon to win re-election, such an appointment would place Peres at the center of all regional and international contacts toward diplomatic progress toward peace with the Palestinians, the report said. Sharon’s senior adviser Uri Shani is said to have made the offer to Peres in a meeting at the end of last week.

Of course, this begs the question–why would Sharon need a foreign minister if he’s ceding control of the most important real estate in the portfolio to Peres, who wouldn’t even be elected?

Peres’ abandonment of his life-long political home means one thing to me: those who voted him out as Labor leader were absolutely right in doing so. If he could turn his back on his party so easily, it can only mean that the Party and its principles were not intrinsic for him, but only a means to an end, which was wielding power for power’s sake. Peres risks becoming a political fossil (many would say he’s long been one) who is increasingly irrelevant to Israeli politics.

Ephraim Sneh, a current Labor MK who did not support Peretz in the leadership fight had this to say to Peres:

“This party of Sharon’s cannot be a ‘home’ for a person who has the ideology of peace and of the Labor Party,” Sneh said.

“Sharon is moving with cleverness, witth cunning, to set out a map in the West Bank, in Judea and Samaria, that is a recipe for the continuation of the conflict.

Referring to Peres, Sneh concluded, “A man who has worked so hard for the sake of peace, and received a Nobel Prize for it, will not lend his fand to a plan that is a hoax.”

“I very much hope he has not changed his world view.”

His remarks already sound prescient.

Dahlia Itzik, not out of the Labor Party more than a few hours has already slung some traditional Israeli red-baiting slurs Peretz’s way:

“As I look at those joining the Labor Party, it’s entirely clear that the party has adopted a diplomatic policy platform that is more Meretz than Meretz – it is Rakah [the former Israeli Communist Party] – even left of Rakah.”


She should be seen as a stalking horse for Peres. But what she’s doing does not do Peres a favor. It merely drags him down into the gutter with her.

Sharon to Likud: I’m Outa Here!

Monday, November 21st, 2005

The Big Man has done it. He’s quit the Likud. It just won’t be the same without him. Now the Party can become the right-fringe, loony tunes outfit it always had the potential to be. But what can we expect from Sharon? Will he run to the center? Or will he run a campaign that mouths centrist positions but really tilts right after the next election? So far, they’re talking the good talk:

Sharon meets with katsavAriel Sharon meets with President Katsav seeking to dissolve Knesset (source: Ynetnews)

The prime minister’s decision to leave the party testifies to a significant about-face in his ideology, which is likely to include favoring the evacuation of most or all isolated settlements in the West Bank, Sharon’s aides said.

Sources close to Sharon said Sunday night that the new party would be a “true centrist party, from every perspective: political, economic and social.”

Sharon’s new party would likely attempt to form a coalition with Labor, Shinui, and even Meretz-Yahad, in addition to gaining parliamentary support from Arab factions in the next Knesset.

Shinui, definitely. Labor, probably not under Peretz’s leadership. Meretz, you’ve got to be joking. The operative word above is “attempt.” I can attempt to talk to the animals–doesn’t mean it’s gonna happen. But tactical voting support within the Knesset for issues dear to the heart of progressives might be possible, say, for West Bank settlement withdrawal. Though I have no idea what “evacuation of most or all isolated settlements” means. I’d sure rather not have the word “isolated” interpolated in that passage. It makes the statement a whole lot less substantive, though any withdrawal is a start.

Elections appear to be headed for early March. March 8th is the date mentioned in this Haaretz article. Here’s the list of who Sharon’s taking with him:

Sharon’s new party is expected to attract 12 to 14 Likud MKs. Among those planning to join the premier are Finance Minister Ehud Olmert, Justice Minister Tzipi Livni, and Ministers Avraham Hirschon, Meir Sheetrit and Gideon Ezra, Israel Radio reported early Monday morning. MKs Roni Bar-On, Eli Aflalo, Ruhama Avraham, Inbal Gavrieli and Majali Wahabi were also reported to be planning to support Sharon.

A truly tantalizing question is whether Sharon will draw anyone from Labor into the fold, especially Shimon Peres:

Vice Premier Shimon Peres, who engaged Sunday in long talks with Sharon regarding future cooperation, will not leave the Labor Party to join Sharon’s new party, Peres’ aides said Monday.

Two interesting points about that passage:

1. that Peres engaged in “long talks” with Sharon about “future cooperation” can mean many things…but one thing’s for sure–if Peres were truly content staying with Peretz in Labor those would not have been “long talks.”

2. the passage implies (though this is a bit of a jump) that Peres plans to remain in politics and not retire as some have urged him to do (including his family); it also could indicate (and I realize this contradicts what I wrote just above) a decent chance that Peres will remain within Labor to support Peretz which would (if Peres was a real supporter and not just a mouther of supportive words) boost Labor’s chances in the election.

For a downbeat assessment of the new party’s staying power read this Haaretz article.

Amir PeretzAmir Peretz lambastes Sharon government at Labor party conclave and takes it out of ruling coalition

Interesting developments within the Labor Party as well. Peretz delivered a stem-winding speech excoriating Sharon for the deepening divide between rich and poor (one of the widest gaps among developed nations). And Peretz expounded a new theme that may resonate with average Israelis not imbued with settler ideological fervor:

Peretz blamed Sharon for transferring millions in funds to the former Gaza Strip settlements of Gush Katif, which he alleged the prime minister knew were not a permanent enterprise, rather than funding education in development towns and building advanced factories inside Israel.

He called on voters from Sharon’s Likud from the lower classes to switch to Labor. “Come join the new social pact,” he said, “You are not abandoning Likud – Likud has abandoned you.”

I think some American campaign consultant wrote that last line for him because I remember reading it coming from a Republican’s mouth (maybe Ken Mehlman) during the last election. I think it will resonate even more in Israel because there is a sense that Likud took advantage of Labor’s indifference toward Mizrahi voters and drew them to the conservative party; but that now it’s Likud–especially due to Netanyahu’s draconian economic austerity policies–which has allowed the Mizrahi to drift away.

Sharon, Peretz in High-Wire Act

Thursday, November 17th, 2005

Ariel Sharon and Amir Peretz have finally met and agreed to new elections in late February or early March. Ynet says that Sharon supports a Feburary 28th date, but none has been set yet.

amir peretzPeretz on a high wire? (credit: Rita Castelnuovo/NY Times)

Both men are performing side-by-side high-wire acts. There may be nets to break their fall but they’re awfully far below them and the nets themselves are frayed. If they succeed in crossing to the other side without a stumble then one of them will win the golden prize, the prime ministership. If they fall, they could bring their own careers and their parties down as well.

Sharon’s high-wire act involves his decision on whether to bolt Likud and establish a new centrist party. Ynet carries an interesting article stating that Sharon is likely to leave Likud (which contradicts the NY Times‘ own story and much of the scuttlebutt I’ve been reading from Israeli political observers). Ynet claims as sources for the information close aides to Sharon. The big benefit for Sharon in leaving is the vast increase in political manuvering room he will gain in terms of addressing the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and internal Israeli politics. The big unknown is how well Sharon would do outside of Likud in the next election.

The Sharon aides quoted in the article say that Sharon has a guarantee of 10-15 Likud MKs who will walk with him (if he does). That would bring Likud from its current 40 seats to 25-30 seats and it would fragment the Israeli political scene by creating a third major party.

Peretz’s circus act is equally daunting. He must whip up a virtually moribund Party and almost single-handedly give it political vitality. He must both articulate a new path for Labor, which under Peres’ leadership foundered on the principle of going-along to get-along with Ariel Sharon, and avoid the pitfalls of over-ideologizing his political platform. If he falls into this trap then his political opponents will make mincemeat out of him as ‘Red Amir,’ ‘Amir the Bolshevik,’ etc. He needs to project a strong, sure hand while exuding warmth and humor. Given Peretz’s left-wing orientation (a rarity these days in Israel), it won’t be the easiest thing for him to gain the trust of those who mistrust or hate him: business, the military, Labor’s Old Guard, and the kibbutz movement. And without making inroads into this group he will have a difficult time of it. He must not back down from his political principles and positions, but he must project a sense of moderation and willingness to work together with those (including voters) who don’t see eye to eye with him.

Finally, the wildest card in all this (there are so many wild cards!) is Hamas and the Palestinian militants. If they want to see another four years of Sharon, no progress toward final status negotiations, continued settlement expansion in the West Bank, and continued assassinations and incarceration of their leaders, then they should continue their attempts to terrorize Israel. As we saw with Shimon Peres’ run for Prime Minister in 1996 after Rabin’s assassination, when the militants unleashed a ferocious series of terror bombings against Israel, this played right into Netanyahu’s hands and he won. The same is likely to happen to Peretz, one of whose potential weaknesses is security. But if Hamas really wants final status negotiations, a viable state of their own, a capital in East Jerusalem, and a secure peace with Israel, then they should end all terror from now through the election. Peretz may be a tough negotiator and give the Palestinians as hard a time as Sharon at the peace table (though we don’t really know how Sharon would negotiate because he’s done very little of it with them), they may never find another Israeli leader as forthright as Peretz. But in never missing an opportunity to miss an opportunity, I doubt that Hamas will get the message.

There are oh so many within Sharon and Peretz’ respective Parties who’d like nothing more than to see each of them fall. These are interesting times. One hopes they will not be ‘interesting’ in the sense of this ancient Chinese proverb: “May you be cursed to live in interesting times.”

Performance Optimization WordPress Plugins by W3 EDGE