Mahzor

New York Public Library

Churches

Sarajevo Haggadah

Mah Nishtanah

Sarajevo haggadah

Antaea Darom

Israeli women's art

Action

Torah as music

Ben Heine

Action

ceramic bowl

Mohammad Said Kalash, "Offering Reconciliation" exhibit (photo: Ilan Amihai)

Action

Punch and Judy/Pinchas and Jamila

Avi Katz

Action

David Grossman

Ben Heine

Action

Eldrige Street shul

Lower East Side

Action

Dove

Ben Heine

Action

Two birds

Hoda Jamal

Action

Israeli and Palestinian boys

from documentary, Promises

Action

Cat in the Hat

Yiddish version

Action

Daylight through the Wall

Banksy: graffiti art on Separation Wall

Action

Maurice Sendak's Brundibar set

New Victory Theater (photo: Nan Melville/NYT)

Action

Daniel Barenboim, West-Eastern Divan Orchestra

Palestinian-Israeli musical ensemble (photo: Kerstin Joensson/AP)

Action

Great Day on Eldrige Street

N.Y.'s klezmer greats celebrate shul rededication (photo: Leo Sorel)

Action

Joint Appeal for Peace

(Avi Katz)

Joint Appeal for Peace

Ketubah, Ancona, Italy (1772)

(Jewish Theological Seminary library)

Ancona ketubah

Posts Tagged ‘israeli-bloggers’

The Sad Case of Aussie Dave

Thursday, December 29th, 2011

UPDATE: Sometime after Aussie Dave/David Lange published a post bragging about the fake identity he’d created and the hoax he’d perpetrated on me, an ace researcher uncovered Lange’s real identity which I posted about here.

Yesterday, I reported in a post that I believed I had exposed the real identity of Aussie Dave, author of the Israellycool blog.  It appears that he invented a fake identity in order to perpetrate a hoax on me.  It boggles the mind that he went to the immense amount of trouble he did to perpetrate this hoax.  It tells you how much free time he has on his hands to engage in all the subterfuge that was necessary to fool me.  It tells you precious little about me, but quite a lot about him.

Dave thinks he’s a genius because I fooled me.  What he doesn’t realize is that in his blog post, he proudly admits that he created a hoax Facebook account for a non-existent person using the photo of a real person, a clear violation of Facebook rules.  Here’s how he bragged about it:

David Loeb is a fake name. The photo in the Facebook profile I set up is of basketballer Jordan Farmar…I used his photo deliberately…

I included in the profile my supposed address (Beit Shemesh)…as well as the URL of this blog to connect David Loeb to it.

I’ve reported him to Facebook for doing this.  I hope there will be repercussions and that he doesn’t have a real Facebook account.  If he does, perhaps Facebook will express its displeasure with idiots like him exploiting company for his own tomfoolish purposes.

Dave moans in his post that I not only violated his privacy by posting what he wanted me to believe was his home address, but that I potentially endangered him.  Which is funny because he doesn’t mention that he not only published my home address and phone number, but my wife’s employer and her work phone.  UPDATE: He’s now claiming that commenters at his site published links to my private information, which is also a lie since the actual information (not links) is still there as clear as day.  I have a screenshot and know the link as well but prefer not allowing others to access it freely.  He also lied when he claimed that he hadn’t pubished the information.  Blogger have the ability to publish or not publish comments.  We all make those choices.  When someone writes a comment and you publish it, you’ve taken responsibility for doing so.  Except if you’re Aussie Dave, then you haven’t taken responsibility for anything.

He and his allies are trying to embarrass Jillian York, a staffer at the Electronic Frontier Foundation, who correctly warned me that his Facebook account appeared to be fake.  They’re claiming that I exposed the private details of an individual in violation of EFF guidelines and that York is somehow guilty of violating her employer’s mission statement calling for protection of the privacy of bloggers.  This is yet more nonsense since Aussie Dave created a publicly accessible Facebook account to which anyone had access and which displayed his alleged address for anyone to see.  Not only that, but the account is fake as is virtually all the information in it.

Dave of course doesn’t mention the recent incident when he hoaxed himself, seeking to believe that my brother had been arrested for being a welfare cheat.  The only truth to his fantasy was that someone with my extremely common last name had been arrested for such a crime.  He created an entire post in which he gleefully, hopefully speculated that the perpetrator might be my brother.  He even searched through my online photo galleries, finding a photo of my brother-in-law and speculating that because he had the same first name as the welfare cheat that they might be the same person.  They weren’t.  Not a word from Dave about this violation of the privacy of my brother-in-law, a totally innocent party in his charade.

There’s a larger point here as far as I’m concerned.  It’s that doing what I do is complicated because I have to trust my sources and go with my gut about their credibility.  Yes, I can do some elementary research to determine their credibility.  But in the end, you have to decide whether or not to take a jump.  Usually, the times when I’ve been hoaxed are when I decide to trust people I’ve never dealt with before and whose bona fides aren’t clear.  That’s what happened in this case.

I’ve said before that I’ve made mistakes in trusting a few hoaxsters (luckily only two as far as I know).  Luckily those mistakes have been few.  Now we can add this one to the previous ones.  When you report stories that I do, there is always the chance that you will make mistakes.  Some will involve discrete points in an overall story.  Others will be larger and more serious errors.  I’ve never claimed to be perfect.  In fact, I think conceding mistakes shows readers that you are human and have nothing to hide.

Dave wrote in his post that he believed I would take down my earlier post exposing him because I would be embarrassed.  Not at all and I certainly won’t.  Both because I want readers to know that I’m transparent; and because I want people to see what he has done and judge him for it.  I want people to understand the pains that the pro-Israel Islamophobic blog world takes to smear its opponents.  And the nastiness of their methods and outcomes.  Aussie Dave now has the distinction of being the James O’Keefe of the pro-Israel Islamophobic blog world.  He and all his supporters may be proud of his methods of lying and deception.

Aussie Dave Exposed

Wednesday, December 28th, 2011

UPDATE: The judgments I made in this post were based on a hoax perpetrated by David Lange aka Aussie Dave.  Unfortunately, I didn’t detect that he was playing me and I published a fraudulent identity Lange had created.  Thankfully though, after he published a post bragging about the deception, an ace researcher uncovered Lange’s real identity which I posted about here.

For those who have a long memory here, one of my earliest prolonged blogging battles was with a far-right wing Islamophobic Australian-Israeli blogger who used the pseudonym, Aussie Dave and wrote an especially putrid blog, Israellycool. Originally, I went head to head with him over his Jewish blogging contest which he organized under the sponsorship of the Jerusalem Post. In taking him to task for the far right wing nature of the vast majority of the blogs nominated, I earned his eternal enmity. He’s now organizing a new version of the contest, the Pro-Israel Blog-Off, for only the farthest right of pro-Israel blogs.  To ensure the Zionist ideological kashrut of the project, the judges include the CEO of the pro-Israel media advocacy group, Honest Reporting (“Honest” should be in square quotes) and “the Embassy of Israel in Dublin.”  Don’t ask how an entire embassy can judge a blogging contest.  The nominees are a very veritable hate-fest of the right-wing Anglo-Israeli blog world including CIF Watch, Elders of Ziyon, My Right Word, etc.

Ever since the days of his first contest, he’s taken every chance he could to attempt (invariably unsuccessfully) to shame, embarrass, humiliate or insult me. I won’t go into the specifics since they’re so puerile and sophomoric.  Davey has threatened to sue me and warned me that he was a lawyer. But somehow, being the bully he is, he talked a good game never following through. I’ve always wondered why he refused to reveal his real identity, especially since he’d published my home address, phone number and my wife’s employer name and work phone at his blog. It seemed especially hypocritical under the circumstances.

david loeb facebook profile

David Loeb's Facebook profile

Now, due to a sloppy error on his part (thanks to an eagle-eyed Israeli who finds him as repellant as I, who caught it), Aussie Dave has exposed his real identity. And since I believe that hypocrites deserve their comeuppance and that their dark secrets deserve to see the light, I’m exposing him for what and who he is: David Loeb, 23 Rashi Street Beit-Shemesh, Israel. In his Facebook profile he notes some sort of affiliation with Virgin Megastores, which may mean he works there. If anyone knows, I’d like to find out.

Commenters note that Loeb has featured a picture of a U.S. basketball player for his profile photo which makes that as fake as the rest of him and his blog is.  He also might’ve considered that featuring his blog’s URL in his Facebook profile would be another dead giveaway to his real identity.

The last straw that determined my decision to expose him was his feeble attempt to link me to a couple from my home city sharing my last name, who were charged with welfare fraud. Loeb hoped at the very least that the cheat might be my brother or some other close relative. It’s bad enough when they implicate me personally in their scummy revenge fantasies. But when they attempt to ensnare innocent family members, that goes too far.

So Dave, I’m throwing you the coming out party you so richly deserve. Enjoy your moment the sun. Now that you’ve been outed you won’t have any more protection than the rest of us, who blog under our own name, have. I daren’t believe it will make you any more responsible or any less bilious. You and leopards, after all, cannot change your spots.

NOTE ABOUT CHANGES TO COMMENTING: I’ve been innundated by spam lately and disappointed that the Akismet anti-spam plugin, which had been doing a great job, began to perform so shoddily.  I’ve implemented a new system that requires commenters to check boxes before their comment is sent to the queue.  I didn’t want to implement a Captcha plugin because I thought that was too intrusive.  I hope this is a reasonable compromise.  If you find anything hinky about the changes or the way the new plugin works, let me know.

Knesset Bill Would Criminalize Speech

Friday, November 25th, 2011
20111125-210829.jpg

Hebrew summary of provisions of draconian new libel bill which passed first reading in Knesset (Ynet)

Among a raft of new authoritarian bills and legislation proposed or passed by the current Knesset is one that will essentially criminalize speech. Under a proposed new libel law, plaintiffs would no long even have to prove damages to win tens of thousands from defendants. Penalties in some categories will be increased six times and the highest damage award will rise to $500,000.

The bill, which handily passed it’s first reading, would harm all Israeli, but hit bloggers especially hard (Hebrew). I know this from my own personal experience since Rachel Neuwirth did sue me unsuccessfully and Aussie Dave and David Yerushalmi threatened to do so, but never followed through with their threats. There are few NGOs prepared to defend bloggers in such circumstances and how many of us have personal means to do so? A Los Angeles law firm took my case pro bono and spent four years defending me, and the plaintiff is still appealing her loss! If you don’t have a friend who’s a senior partner in a major law firm where do you stand?

There are even fewer such resources for Israeli bloggers. Plus the obstacles in the path of their reporting are even higher than those facing me. They have gag orders and censorship. They have powerful oligarchs with deep pockets and lawyers willing to use the law for the purpose of harassment. They have a draconian security establishment which is a law unto itself. They face a quiescent judicial system designed to favor corporate and state interests at the expense of the individual.

Bloggers in Israel are the canaries in the coal mine of Israeli democracy. The first blogger thrown in prison or bankrupted by such court action under this law will close down a curtain of freedom of the press in the country.

Itzik Sporta of HaOketz said it well when he derided the Knesset for wasting it’s time addressing “problems” that don’t exist rather than ones raised by the social justice movement which cry out for resolution. Israel has the fifth greatest income disparity between rich and poor among OCED nations. One quarter of Israelis live in poverty. Among children, the number is closer to half. There are huge reservoirs of hate and injustice among ethnic groups. Not to mention serious conflicts with its neighbors to be resolved. Instead they’re fixated on helping celebrities, politicians, and oligarchs getting their pound of flesh from the hard working journalists of their country, who labor on behalf of the common person, giving them enough information to make sense out of the mess their country is in.

We might want to start things off after this monstrosity is passed by bringing the first prosecution against the law itself for libeling free speech and press in Israel. One wag quoted in The Marker article says he’s going to exploit the new racist law declaring Israel a Jewish state by suing every Israeli Palestinian who denies it. Then he plans to take the $75,000 he wins from Israeli Palestinian social satitist Sayed Kashua (no doubt a personal friend, I hope) and hire the highest priced psychiatrist he can find to tell the world, he and his country are not insane.

Whether this schandeh of a bill ever passes or not, the damage is done. Merely proposing it has set loose the jackals who circle round Israeli democracy seeking to pick off the weak and vulnerable. First the bloggers, then the journalists, then the NGOs. By the time they come for the average citizen it will already be too late, as Pastor Niemoller so famously wrote. Even Bibi’s own mouthpiece, Yisrael HaYom, warns of the dangers of the law; which is quite ironic since the competition, once it can no longer report anything interesting, will fold and leave the field to Bibiton. The triumph of authoritarianism in Israeli life will only benefit Bibi’s media properties, which will not be challenged under these new measures.

If I were more selfish I’d see this development as a boon to someone like me not subject to Israeli law. After all, when Israel’s democracy dies there only be greater need for blogs like mine. But I’d much rather see Israeli democracy and free speech triumph. Until it does, I will continue doing what I do. And if things turn worse, Israelis who value a free press and who deride secrecy and government impunity may see this blog as their resource and in a way, their insurance policy. I will do whatever I can to protect Israeli sources and bloggers from their work being criminalized. I hope it doesn’t come to Israeli bloggers turning their websites into samizdat, underground knowledge whose sources and web servers must be hidden from the prying eyes of the intelligence agents and wrongdoers who seek to root out the good guys.

Meron Rapoport Feels the Hate in Silwan

Tuesday, August 25th, 2009
Silwan (Palestine Remembered)

Silwan (Palestine Remembered)

Sol Salbe of the Australian Jewish Democratic Society just forwarded a powerful profile by former Haaretz reporter, Meron Rapoport, of the East Jerusalem neighborhood, Silwan.  Long a poor Arab neighborhood lying just outside the Old City, it has come within the sites of the extremist settler movement, which has been Judaizing it through the eviction of long-time residents and their replacement with settlers.  Rapoport did the prose equivalent of Max Blumenthal’s Feel the Hate video by strolling through the neighborhood and engaging Jewish passersby in conversation.  In the course of 15 minutes, he heard more hate than you could shake a stick at.

This story has just been published in Comment is Free as Fifteen Minutes of Hate, in a different translation.  It was originally published in Hebrew in Ha-Okets:

A Hate-Filled Morning

Meron Rapoport, 24th August 2009

Last Thursday was a heat wave, but along the paved stone path that ascends through the centre of Silwan – The City of David, it was more pleasant. Perhaps it was the cool breeze, or the cool stone houses mollifying the air, or maybe it was broad vista of Jerusalem’s mountains. There were three of us – Ilan the director, Michael the cameraman, and me, the interviewee. We were making a film that explores the overt institutional discrimination against this East Jerusalem neighbourhood’s Palestinian residents. It is accompanied by a discrimination in favour of the Jewish settlers who for their part do not hide their desire to “Judaise” the neighbourhood and erase its Palestinian nature.

Even before we manage to position our camera, a group of religious girls comes up the path (we could tell they were religious by their skirts). They were around eight to ten years old, smug and beautiful chatterboxes. One of them slowed down beside us. “Film me”, she said amiably. “What would you like to tell us”, we asked. “I want to say that Jerusalem is a city that belongs to us, the Jews”, she said while walking – “it’s just a shame there are Arabs here. The Messiah will only come when there’s not even a single Arab left here”. She walked on. The girls giggled and sauntered along with her.

Jewish-occupied Silwan (Palestine Monitor)

Jewish-occupied Silwan (Palestine Monitor)

Two minutes later, a robust young man arrives carrying a weapon and walkie-talkie, bearing no identification on his clothes. Even before he opened his mouth I surmised that he was a security guard, employed by the private security company, operated by the settlers but financed by the Housing Ministry to the tune of 40 million shekels, annually. This security company has long ago become a private police force that polices the whole neighbourhood and terrorises the Palestinian residents without any legal basis. A committee set up by the Housing Minister determined that this arrangement must be stopped, and that the safety of the inhabitants (both Jewish and Arab) must be in the hands of Israel’s Police force, as applies to the rest of Israel’s citizens. The government adopted the committee’s recommendation in June 2006, but changed its mind six months later. The settlers had been lobbying. The private police continue to operate here.

“What are you doing here”, the young man asked. “What are you doing here”, I asked him. “I’m a security guard”, he answered, “tell me what you’re doing here”. “We’re standing here in the street”, I told him. “Tell me what you’re doing here”, he became irate. “It’s none of your business”, I told him. “What’s your name”, he asked me. “And what’s your name”, I ask him. “Doesn’t matter”, he answered, “I’m a security guard”. “So it doesn’t matter what my name is either”, I replied. The irritated guard talks on his walkie-talkie. Were we Palestinian, we would have long ago been gone. That is the unwritten protocol. But we were Israelis, Hebrew speakers and a problem. Headquarters apparently explained to him that there was nothing he could do, that this was a public area. The guard took his position beside us, with his weapon, and didn’t leave us alone throughout our stay.

We moved our position. Two-three minutes later two young women came up the path. They are seventeen or eighteen years old. Secular, evidently not local residents. One of them stood in front of the camera. “Take my picture”, she fawned. “Do you want to be interviewed”, we asked her. “Yes”, she said. She’s from Gan Yavneh, came to visit Jerusalem, the City of David, she said. “Why the City of David in particular”, we asked. “Because this is where David was a king, this is a very important location for the Jewish people. It’s just a shame there are Arabs here. But soon all the Arabs will die, God willing, and Jerusalem will be ours alone”. She walked on.

Two minutes went by. An Orthodox family came up the path. The husband, dressed in black, asked Ilan the director: “say, do both Arabs and Jews live in this neighbourhood?” “Both Palestinians and Jews”, Ilan replied, “but the majority is Palestinian”. “That’s temporary”, the Orthodox man allayed his concerns; soon there will be no Arabs left here.

I look at Ilan and Michael. Barely a quarter of an hour had passed since we arrived; we had not interrogated anyone about their attitude to Arabs, the Israeli-Palestinian conflict or about the future of Jerusalem. We just stood in the middle of the street. Like pylons. The hatred poured on in our direction, like a river to the ocean. Freely, naturally. “Say”, I asked Ilan. “Will we encounter anyone who’ll tell us something positive, something humane, something good about humankind?” “Forget about humane”, Ilan replied. “Give us someone who’ll say: “what nice air we have here, in Jerusalem’”.

Silwan. Remember the name. Soon it will help you forget Hebron.

(translated by Keren Rubinstein)

For more background on the battle to displace Silwan’s Palestinian residents read this story.

IDF-Border Police Pogrom at Safa

Sunday, June 28th, 2009


Ta’ayush leaders, David Shulman (also a Hebrew University professor ) and Joseph Dana, report that peace activists who attempted to accompany the West Bank villagers of al-Safa yesterday to harvest their fields were met with brutal force by the Israeli Border Police.  One Palestinian suffered a broken leg.  An Israeli teenager suffered a severely sprained arm that they thought was broken.

David’s report came via eyewitness Amiel Vardi, whose daughter’s arm was nearly broken:

Amiel says that not only were the 30 activists arrested as soon as they arrived at as-Safa to accompany the farmers to their fields, but they were also savagely beaten at the time of the arrests and then beaten again, severely, with clubs, while being transported to the police station. We are talking about people who had their heads rammed against the sides of the army jeeps, and severe beatings with clubs in full view of the senior commanders who were present there– two Mahatim, that is, brigade commanders. No policemen were involved– these were Border Police (two units), and the sense is that they had explicit orders to do this. Sahar, Amiel’s daughter, had her arm badly twisted but fortunately not broken. One of the Palestinians had his leg broken.

All of us have been arrested before, most of us many times, but we’ve never seen this– although we know it’s common practice used against Palestinian arrestees. It was a very frightening experience, not much different in kind from what the Iranian regime has been doing to protesters in the streets of Iran (in case anyone thinks Israel is more enlightened than Iran).

…We need to get this information out into the international media as soon as possible.

Best, David

Bernard Avishai has published David’s much longer and more comprehensive account at his blog.

Joseph Dana of Ibn Ezra was an eyewitness to the police riot:

Over the last several months, Israeli and international activists have made the small village of Safa an important part of the struggle for the rule of law in the Occupied Territories. The village is situated next to the settlement of Bat Ayin, which was the scene of a horrific murder of a twelve-year-old boy by a mentally disturbed resident of Safa in April 2009. Since that incident, and along with growing US pressure on Israel regarding settlements, [Bay Ayin] has become increasingly violent towards its neighbors in Safa. This violence has been characterized by the burning and cutting down of Palestinian groves, severe beatings of Safa residents and Israeli activists and, just last week, hurling rocks on the farmers and activists that attempt to work the land…

Today, 27 June 2009, the IDF and Israel Border Police created a blockade at the entrance of the farmlands. As soon as we arrived, the IDF began using violent force against the forty to fifty Israelis, Palestinians and international activists on the ground. As we walked into the area, pleading with the army to allow us entry, we were beaten, thrown to the ground, attacked and insulted. We demanded to see legal authority for such actions. That only came later after we had been ‘removed’ from the area. Many of us suffered bruises and injuries, including an 18-year-old Israeli female whose arm was sprained and a Palestinian man who reportedly had his leg broken.

The IDF arrested 30 Israelis for violating a “closed military zone” order that, according to the 2006 Supreme Court ruling, cannot be used simply to prevent farming in Safa. The activists were detained for three hours and then released without being charged with any offense.

The events today in Safa are a major escalation in the IDF policy to intimidate and attack Israeli and international peace activists who wish to help Palestinian farmers maintain their livelihood, even as the IDF does nothing to restrain the settlers. No matter how much the state may sympathize with the settlers and feel the need to protect them, it must not allow this vigilante behavior to continue, as it only propagates the cycle of violence.”

Let anyone who sides with Bibi Netanyahu regarding the settlement freeze consider what effect encouraging such settler thugs and their state-sanctioned enablers has on the political situation. As Pres. Obama and George Mitchell seem to be saying: we need more, rather than less pressure. Easing the pressure allows law-breaking Jews to feel vindicated by their behavior. We need to let Bibi know that every such riot by agents of the state makes our job easier. So he has two choices–he can clamp down on this madness and try to make Israel’s Occupation policies look slightly more palatable to the world; or he can do nothing and let our side make hay.

David Shulman presents the argument in Avishai’s blog eloquently as usual:

Let no one claim that such things happen only in places like Iran but never in Israel. Let no one claim that Israel is an enlightened, free country, the very opposite of places like Iran. Let no one claim that the Israeli army is incapable of inhuman cruelty inflicted on innocent victims, whether they are Palestinian civilians or Israelis demonstrating peacefully against the occupation. Already now, as I write, the system Israel has put in place in the occupied territories is barbaric, in every sense of the word. Unless there is massive international pressure and effective protest, that system is not about to go away. Indeed, in the meantime, things are getting worse, on the ground, day by day.

What is astonishing about this incident is that the Bat Ayin settlers didn’t even have to weigh in with their usual brutish thuggery. The IDF and Border Police acted on their behalf. Let no Israeli or Diaspora Israel supporter ever say that the settlers do not represent Israel, that they are somehow aberrant extremists. Indeed they do fully reflect and represent Israel. If this were not the case then there would be security and order in the Territories for settlers and Palestinians alike.

Gaza in Flames, Labor Party Turns to Barak–and Groundhog Day–Again

Wednesday, June 13th, 2007

This is one of those terribly depressing days in Mideast politics. Palestinian brother is killing Palestinian brother. Women and boys are being gunned down because their father belongs to the wrong faction. I heard a woman screaming at a peace rally today in Gaza: “Gaza is a broken worthless chair and they’re fighting over who will own the chair.” I couldn’t think of a more apt metaphor. What did she get for her trouble? Gunmen spraying their rally for an end to the violence with rifle fire. How dare these poor people demonstrate for peace when the bullies have their own agenda! “Let us kill each other for that chair, then we can talk about peace.”

In Israel, people are not being mowed down in the streets as they are in Gaza. But developments are no less dispiriting. The Labor Party has turned to an old failed war horse, Ehud Barak, as its new party leader. The hope is that he will somehow bring back that ol’ black magic. You remember the guy who failed to deliver at Camp David and Taba. The guy who Sharon trounced. Yeah that guy. Failed once, let’s give him a try again. Maybe he’ll fail again. But fail better the second time.

Thanks to Sol Salbe for pointing me to one of my favorite Israeli progressive blogs, Ha-Okets. And thanks for making me realize that when I first referred here to this blog I mistranslated its title. Sol correctly notes it means “The Sting,” an apt title for a progressive blog. Here is a portion of Itzik Sporta’s teriffically witty and caustic characterization of the Barak victory (in Hebrew).

All of this gives me the same feeling one gets when watching Groundhog Day, in which Bill Murray wakes up each morning to a day precisely identical to the day before…So it is in Israel where we have been sentenced to relive the same disappointment of a bygone era with the same persons returning to us in a new/old format or old/new format. Note the example of Peres and Sharon–and with the young generation, aging before our eyes, Netanyahu and Barak.

Let me be quick to add that in Groundhog Day, Bill Murray had a sensitive intelligence completely lacking in most of the personalities Sporta lists above. Murray, after living with a seeming death sentence of days repeating themselves eternally, finally realizes that if he changes his behavior even slightly for the better his days improve too. There is no such ability among Netanyahu, Barak or Peres to change. They are the failures they always were. They will bring nothing but more failure if they come to power; with the exception of Peres who, if he wins the presidency, will retire to the presidential mansion to live out his days embalmed in the amber of Israeli political history.

News from Lebanon: Blogging the Middle East

Saturday, July 15th, 2006
10 month old dies in beirut bombingView from Beirut: 10 month old dies (image: Blogging the Middle East)

For anyone wishing to read a first-hand account by a Lebanese blogger of the current crisis there, PLEASE read what Blogging the Middle East has to say about the conflict. It’s a first-person blog-by-blow, raw, in the moment diary and it’s invaluable to gain the perspective of someone living in the moment on the “other side” of the conflict.

And for those who read Hebrew, HaOkets gives a ‘breath of fresh air’ dovish perspective on events from the Israeli point of view.

Global Voices Online Excludes Tikun Olam From ‘Israel’ Category

Friday, June 16th, 2006

global voices online logo
Some of you may know of a very interesting blog aggregator called Global Voices Online. It divides up the blogosphere by country and aggregates some of the best national blogs. Each day, a country editor does a roundup which summarizes particular blog posts. Here’s how the website describes its mission:

Global Voices Online is a non-profit global citizens’ media project.

A growing number of bloggers around the world are emerging as “bridge bloggers:” people who are talking about their country or region to a global audience. Global Voices is your guide to the most interesting conversations, information, and ideas appearing around the world on various forms of participatory media such as blogs, podcasts, photo sharing sites, and videoblogs.

I think this is a terrific and much needed resource for bloggers interested in world affairs. In this day and age, when our nation in particular seems more closed off than ever from voices and perspectives beyond our shores, GVO is a welcome addition.

But I’m slightly flummoxed by the decision to exclude the Israeli-Palestinian category of this blog from GVO’s Israel section. To be fair, the idea of our exclusion isn’t entirely outside the bounds of reason. As managing editor Rachel Rawlins wrote to me:

She [Israel editor Lisa Goldman] concentrates on blogs written by people living in Israel since one of our objectives is to curate conversations generally taking place outside the already very well represented regions of North America and Western Europe.

But the way Goldman explained my exclusion rankled:

I do not include your blog in my roundups on the Israeli blogosphere because you are American, not Israeli…My GVO posts are about the Israeli blogosphere, not the Jewish blogosphere. While blogs about Israel by non-Israelis are often interesting and valuable, they do not, by definition, belong to the Israeli blogosphere

While all this is well and good, it is a false dichotomy in the context of GVO’s Israel section. The reason is that GVO covers only English-language blogs, which means in the case of Israel that the blogs are largely written by Israelis of the English-language Diaspora (U.S., Canada, Britain, Australia, etc.) origin. I’m sure that’s not entirely the case, but I know that it is largely the case. And I’m not saying that these blogs are not ‘Israeli.’ But I am saying that they are not nearly as politically or culturally diverse as the Hebrew-language native Israeli blog world.

It’s for that reason that I think it’s critical to include voices like Tikun Olam. After all, my Israeli-Palestinian section is solely about Israel and its relations with its enemy-neighbor much like the blogs Lisa Goldman reviews for GVO (though to be fair, she does review blogs focussed on non-political issues). But I bring a slightly more independent, disinterested viewpoint to the conversation. If you look at Lisa Goldman’s roundups you’ll see that the politics of the blogs she covers are mostly (though not exclusively) right of center, sometimes far to the right. And when she does include progressive voices she’ll invariably use terms like “leftist” (as she’s done twice in her most recent report) to characterize the blog’s viewpoint. She doesn’t even realize the judgmental nature of the term (and certainly wasn’t intending to offend). But as someone whose views of this conflict have been disparaged numerous times by hardline pro-Israel readers, I know how the term is used and how it feels to have someone spit it at you (not that this was by any means Lisa’s intent).

It’s ironic that Haitham Sabbah, editor of the Palestine Global Voices section does periodically include links to my blog posts about the conflict; but Goldman, a fellow lover of Zion refuses to consider doing so as well. Haitham, my supposed enemy embraces me and she views me as treif.

I disagree with her contention that non-Israeli blogs about Israel do not “belong to the Israeli blogosphere.” It is critical that there be more interaction between these two groups and that those interested in Israel and this conflict should have as broad a representation of opinion as possible. Goldman’s own roundups portray this problem through the relative lack of political diversity in them and her own slight awkwardness in covering blogs she sees as “leftist.” Calling a blogger you don’t agree with a “leftist,” as she’s done twice in her most recent roundup is insulting. I don’t believe she intended this as an insult. But it is condescending and judgmental nonetheless. Has she ever called any bloggers in her roundup “rightist?” I didn’t see that term or even “conservative” used in describing bloggers she covers who are right of center.

In fact, a problem with the English language Israeli blog world is that it is largely (though not entirely) shut off from the progressive end of the political spectrum. That’s why I think letting in ‘outside’ voices (though I do not consider myself outside this sphere) would only expand the dialogue. In addition, within Israeli society voices like mine are not heard clearly because the issue of security seems to put a lid on wide-ranging political discussion. This is something the Global Voices should be willing to address & promote.

My GVO roundups include links to blogs by non-Jewish residents of Israel; some of them are citizens and others are not. My goal is to give a voice to Israel’s complex, multi-cultural, multi-ethnic society. I hope that, as a progressive Zionist, you will understand and support my effort to highlight the concerns of Israel’s non-Jewish minority bloggers over those of non-Israelis.

It is good to know that Goldman does not limit her coverage to Jewish Israelis. But if she did this would be discriminatory. So she’s doing a good thing; but it is something I would expect from any competent editor. And why does she make it appear that the decision to include non-Jewish Israeli bloggers in the roundups precludes including folks like me? She’s linking apples & oranges in this case. I say let 1,000 flowers bloom. I would certainly agree if she said she wished to be very careful in terms of the non-Israeli blogs you included because as Rachel wrote to me, you do want to include as much as possible an authentic Israeli voice in this section. But adding my voice will not prevent an authentic Israeli voice from being heard.

By the way, I’m curious how many Israeli Arab bloggers Goldman includes. There may not be many for all I know. But it’d be very valuable to find and include them to the greatest extent possible.

Performance Optimization WordPress Plugins by W3 EDGE