Mahzor

New York Public Library

Churches

Sarajevo Haggadah

Mah Nishtanah

Sarajevo haggadah

Antaea Darom

Israeli women's art

Action

Torah as music

Ben Heine

Action

ceramic bowl

Mohammad Said Kalash, "Offering Reconciliation" exhibit (photo: Ilan Amihai)

Action

Punch and Judy/Pinchas and Jamila

Avi Katz

Action

David Grossman

Ben Heine

Action

Eldrige Street shul

Lower East Side

Action

Dove

Ben Heine

Action

Two birds

Hoda Jamal

Action

Israeli and Palestinian boys

from documentary, Promises

Action

Cat in the Hat

Yiddish version

Action

Daylight through the Wall

Banksy: graffiti art on Separation Wall

Action

Maurice Sendak's Brundibar set

New Victory Theater (photo: Nan Melville/NYT)

Action

Daniel Barenboim, West-Eastern Divan Orchestra

Palestinian-Israeli musical ensemble (photo: Kerstin Joensson/AP)

Action

Great Day on Eldrige Street

N.Y.'s klezmer greats celebrate shul rededication (photo: Leo Sorel)

Action

Joint Appeal for Peace

(Avi Katz)

Joint Appeal for Peace

Ketubah, Ancona, Italy (1772)

(Jewish Theological Seminary library)

Ancona ketubah

Posts Tagged ‘iraq-war’

The Shores of Tripoli Run Red With Martyrs’ Blood

Monday, February 21st, 2011

The Marine Corps hymn brags of the force’s presence from the “halls of Montezuma to the shores of Tripoli.”  But the Marines haven’t been in Tripoli since the early 1800s, when they attacked the Barbary pirates.  It doubtful they’ll be going back there any time soon, though those shores of Tripoli are running red today with the blood of hundreds of dead protesters murdered in cold blood by Khadaffi’s hired mercenaries and security forces–at least those who haven’t defected to the opposition or resigned their positions in disgust.

It’s common in the west to look cynically at the fervor for freedom  of the peoples of the Middle East.  Their yearnings seem so pure, so passionately held.  But we know how easily such idealism is turned to cynicism and disgust at the practical compromises made after the walls and dictators fall.  Look how hard life is in Russia and eastern Europe after the fall of Communism.  We use such excuses at least some of us to look away at the suffering of others.  Surely, our political leaders do so for even stronger reasons of preserving the status quo, maintaining U.S. interests in the region.  Then of course there is a tendency to view the Middle East as so foreign, so other; it’s just hard to muster empathy for cultures so far from ours physically and emotionally.

protesters in benghazi

Protesters in Benghazi against the rule of Khaddafi (BBC)

But how can we turn away from the selflessness, the pure willingness to look death and the dictator in the face and spit at both.  This is an emotion that we ourselves can never know.  We have too much in our lives to understand this.  We have too much to protect, too much we’re unwilling to lose.  But when you read the purity of this statement you know the Libyan opposition must win, and that if they do not it will be our fault as much as Khaddafi’s:

Libyans from other cities — Benghazi and Misrata — were reported to be heading to Tripoli to join the battle against the government forces, said Mansour O. El-Kikhia, a professor of Middle East studies at the University of Texas, Austin, who had talked to people inside the country.

“There are dead on the streets, you cannot even pick them up,” he said by e-mail. “The army is just shooting at everybody. That has not deterred the people from continuing.”

Though the outcome of the battle is impossible to determine, some protesters said the bloodshed in Tripoli only redoubled their determination.

“He will never let go of his power,” said one, Abdel Rahman. “This is a dictator, an emperor. He will die before he gives an inch. But we are no longer afraid. We are ready to die after what we have seen.”

There is talk of creating a no-fly zone over Libya which would prevent the regime from mowing down its own citizens by the hundreds as it did today.  This would mean that European powers would be called upon to shoot down Libyan planes if they attempted to operate in their own airspace.  The idea of such a no-fly zone has not been seen since the days of Saddam Hussein and the U.S. invasion of Iraq.  But it seems fitting that Saddam and Khaddafi would earn the same treatment and penalty.

We must not allow the dictator to commit mass murder against his own people.  We must help the people to achieve what they have set out to do, to rid themselves of tyranny.

Yes, certainly we don’t know what will follow.  We don’t know if we will like the leaders who replace him.  It’s a volatile neck of the woods, after all.  But the Middle East has seen the fall of two noxious dictators who fled with comparatively little bloodshed.  Autocrats in Yemen and Bahrain remain under threat.  We must not let the remaining entrenched power elites learn the lesson that they can retain their prerogatives through spilling rivers of their fellow countrymen’s blood.  It may be that like in Egypt, the Libyans are perfectly able to take care of business and do not need outside help.  That would be the best scenario.  But in Egypt, the regime didn’t resort to wholesale murder.  In Libya it has.  The Bible says: “Thou shalt not stand idly by.”

Barack Obama is very good at standing idly by.  I hope he doesn’t follow past example in this crisis.

The other nation that benefits indirectly from such mass violence is Israel.  Arabs spilling Arab blood is a perfect foil for the Likudist Mideast narrative: the Arabs are a bloodthirsty, violent lot.  They only understand violence.  Life is cheap for them.  We Israelis are the lone western bastion in the region.  We uphold the values of western civilization here on the west’s behalf.  Therefore, allow us to right to do things as we see fit to retain some semblance of western values and civilization in the face of the Arab onslaught.  If we do not maintain our own security through continuing the Occupation, and being strong in the face of the Arab threat, then we Israelis will end up like the Libyan protestors.

It’s not a very convincing argument to anyone who knows the region and its history.  But it is an argument that resonates with many Israelis and their advocates in the Diaspora.

Doug Pike Takes J Street Endorsement and Funding, Then Rejects It

Thursday, March 25th, 2010

Doug Pike, profile in craven cowardice

Every so often, something happens in politics which totally mystifies.  Today brings news that Doug Pike, Democratic candidate for Congress in PA’s 6th District, and a J Street endorsee, has rejected the group’s support and returned the $6,000 it gave him.  Why?  Do you want the real reason or the made up one (from Pike).  His explanation involves a claim he didn’t understand J Street’s real positions on Israel and how much they differed from his own.

What positions?  Well, take settlements and building in East Jerusalem.  He didn’t know J Street, his own Democratic president, and the rest of the world outside Israeli right wing circles opposed such expansionism.  Pike appears to believe Bibi Netanyahu should be able to plop down massive amounts of new homes for Jerusalem’s ultra-Orthodox and their 12-children households right smack dab in the middle of historically Palestinian neighborhoods:

Pike said, he was “troubled” by J Street’s recent stance that Israel halt construction in eastern Jerusalem…

The endorsement was an impediment to my being able to explain my convictions about Israel’s security.

You see, if you accept funds from J Street you can’t possibly be in favor of Israel’s security, can you?  Well, sure you can be in favor of Israel’s security, as the scores of other Congressional candidates are who accept such funds.  But it IS an impediment in defending yourself to far right-wing Aipac moneybags supporters who’ve undoubtedly importuned Pike to abandon J Street.  I urge those who track Aipac-inspired political donations to keep tabs on how much primary dough Pike gets from such PACs.  It will at least match $6,000, but probably go far higher.

This statement from Pike is boilerplate Aipac and urges the U.S. to refrain from exerting any pressure on Israel to negotiate in good faith or demanding any sacrifices or compromises whatsoever:

“The United States should encourage a peace agreement…but ultimately, this must come from negotiations between the two sides,” Pike wrote in a column addressing his decision. “I agree with Prime Minister Netanyahu: Negotiations should begin as soon as possible without preconditions.”

Dr. Manan Trivedi, Democrat for Congress in PA's 6th district.

I am chagrined to report that Douglas Pike is the son of Otis Pike, who served a Westchester, N.Y. district that abutted my home for nine terms.  He had a distinguished record as an environmentalist and I knew him as a politician with a conscience and principles.  Apparently, the move to Pennsylvania or something else has caused his son to abandon whatever values his father may’ve tried to teach him.  It’s sad.

I’m glad to report that J Street’s supporters responded by raising $30,000 in new money in response to Pike’s reversal.  Let that be a lesson to those who are mesmerized by the siren song of Aipac dough.

But I’m pleased to report that there is an even better Democratic candidate running in his district: Dr. Manan Trivedi.  Trivedi is an Indian-American medical doctor, Iraq war veteran and Lt. Commander in the U.S. Navy.  And he’s going to his first seder this week.  So somehow I doubt Trivesi is going to pose much danger to Israel’s interests if elected to the House.  Not that this will stop all Aipac’s PAC-related donors from funding lots of attacks against the candidate’s pro-Israel bona fides.

Pike has a $1.2-million campaign war chest.  Trivedi, only $120,000.  I’ve just donated to his campaign and I urge you to do so.  Let’s show profiles in cowardice like Pike and all those Aipac-ers who will flock to his campaign that there is a reward for those in the U.S. Congress who take a principled, pragmatic position regarding Israeli-Palestinian peace.  I’d also urge J Street to endorse Dr. Trivedi.  It would be great to have progressive American Jews support an Indian-American Congressional candidate.  That would be one of the finest examples of American ethnic democratic politics at work.

The primary winner earns the right to knock Republican loyalist Jim Gerlach out of Congress for good: “soon and in our day.”

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Bush Had Gog and Magog, Bibi Has Amalek

Monday, May 25th, 2009

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu considers the lifting of the Iranian nuclear threat his life’s mission. Before coming to power, he had mentioned that such an operation might cost thousands of lives, but the price was justified in view of the threat’s severity.

–Aluf Benn, Haaretz

“My job is first and foremost to ensure the future of the state of Israel … the leadership’s job is to eliminate the danger. Who will eliminate it? It is us or no one.”

–Bibi Netanyahu quoted in Haaretz

Recently, Jacques Chirac confirmed that George Bush, in telephone calls leading up the Iraq war, attempted to persuade France to join the coalition of the willing by invoking the Biblical war of Gog and Magog.  While Americans generally knew their president had a evangelical zeal in both his religious beliefs and political stances, even this revelation takes our breath away.  So saith George, the Lord’s avenger:

“This confrontation is willed by God, who wants to use this conflict to erase his people’s enemies before a New Age begins”…

Bush had reportedly said to the Palestinian foreign minister that he was on “a mission from God” in launching the invasions of Iraq and Afghanistan and was receiving commands from the Lord.

We didn’t know just how far gone this man was in his religious fanaticism.

The closest political leader to Bush on today’s political stage is Bibi Netanyahu, as the above Haaretz passages make clear.  In addition, there are Bibi’s references to Iran being Amalek, implying Israel’s duty to smite the mullahs a terrible blow lest they first strike Israel in an nuclear attack.

There is always a question, when considering the words of Israeli politicians, of sincerity and conviction.  Unlike politicians of other western democracies, Israel’s tend to bend and sway with the political winds.  What a politician says on any given day could be annulled or modified on the next day–or even the next hour.  So how much Bibi believes in what he is saying about Iran and how much is political posturing is an open question.

But Aluf Benn credits Bibi with firmly held beliefs as does Jeffrey Goldberg (not that Goldberg is my arbiter of truth by any means).  So we must at least credit some conviction to Bibi.  In doing so, we have to concede that the fervor with which he leads Israel to war against Iran is frightening in the extreme.

We have the example of George Bush to guide us.  He too believed he was on a mission from the Lord to tidy up the Middle East.  What good did such religious fanaticism do him?  What good will similar zeal do Netanyahu?  Aren’t we more likely to end up after an Israeli attack on Iran with the same mess to clean up as the one Bush left in Iraq?

And haven’t we learned any lessons about those who allow religion to drive political decisions?  Think West Bank settlers, the Taliban, the Terry Schiavo debacle, etc.  This ends up giving a bad name to religion AND politics.  I’d much rather enjoy my religion and my politics in separate courses, rather than on the same plate.

Bush’s Green Zone Press Conference: Ready, Aim, Duck!

Monday, December 15th, 2008

I wonder if the Iraqi journalist who threw not one, but both shoes at George Bush had been practising. After all both shoes would’ve hit Bush if he hadn’t ducked. From 12 feet away, that’s a pretty good shot. Bush’s ducking reflex was pretty quick too. If I didn’t know better I’d say he was like one of those old vaudeville performers who knew when the rotten eggs were coming in his performance.

The N.Y. Times reports that his comments in Arabic were rather piquant:

“This is a gift from the Iraqis; this is the farewell kiss, you dog!” He then threw a shoe at Mr. Bush, who ducked and narrowly avoided it.

As stunned security agents and guards, officials and journalists watched, Mr. Zaidi then threw his other shoe, shouting in Arabic, “This is from the widows, the orphans and those who were killed in Iraq!”

I wonder if we can have a mini-competition in the comment thread about what you would’ve thrown at Bush if you’d had the chance.  I’ll start with a few suggestions:

1. the book
2. cream pie
3. the baby AND the bath water (sorry for mixing my metaphors)
4. rotten eggs
5. rotten tomatoes

Your suggestions please.

Ever the joker, Bush claimed that the surge was ““one of the greatest successes in the history of the United States military.” Bigger than the Battle of the Bulge or Midway? Bigger than Gettysburg? Bigger than D-Day? Imagine what serious military historians are saying about this. Either Bush has no idea of U.S. military history or he’s a jackass or a two-bit self-serving hack politician. Take your pick.

The N.Y. Times indicates that the Iraqi journalist was roughed up pretty badly after the fact and is still in custody.

Palin: Iraq War ‘Task from God’

Wednesday, September 3rd, 2008


Praise the Lord and pass the ballot box.

Sarah Palin may be “right with God.” But is she “right with America?” Talk about separation of church and state…I was just watching the accompanying video with my wife and she–both of us having been born and raised in New York–said: “Can you imagine a governor of New York saying these things?” Frankly, I can’t imagine a governor of any state saying such things, at least not as a sitting governor.

Things are different in Alaska perhaps because politically there is less at stake. But now that Palin seeks to move onto a national stage, it is precisely videos like this that will allow a national audience to determine whether she is fit to be elected.

Here are some of the choice quotations from the video that jumped out at me. In his introduction, controversial Pastor Ed Kalnins notes that when he first met Palin, she was the mayor of Wasilla:

When I got the chance to meet our mayor, I said: “This person loves Jesus. That’s the bottom line. She loves Jesus with everything she has. She’s a disciple of the Lord Jesus Christ before she’s a mayor.”

After boasting that her 19 year-old son Track had enlisted in the military and was about to be deployed to Iraq, Palin preached:

“Pray for our military men and women who are striving to do what is right. Also, for this country, that our leaders, our national leaders, are sending them [U.S. soldiers] out on a task that is from God,” she exhorted the congregants. “That’s what we have to make sure that we’re praying for, that there is a plan and that that plan is God’s plan.

Subsequently, she makes another boast about a $30 billion natural gas pipeline which she’s seeking to build from Alaska through Canada to the lower 48:

” I can work really, really hard to get a natural gas pipeline, a $30 billion project that’s going to create a lot of new jobs for Alaskans and will have a lot of energy flowing through here. And pray about that also. I think God’s will has to be done in unifying people and companies to get that gas line built, so pray for that.

She then lists the tasks she can do as governor to make the state a decent place to live. But she adds:

None of that is gonna do any good if the people’s heart isn’t right with God. We can work together to make sure that God’s will be done here in Alaska.

After watching this video, I can perfectly understand why evangelicals are overjoyed with her nomination. But I can’t understand why John McCain was as well. Did he not think that videos like this might disturb non-evangelicals, not to mention non-Christians of which, believe it or not, there are a few in this country?

Religiously, Sarah Palin is George Bush unbuttoned. The latter manages much of the time to disguise the evangelical passion of his political mission. Palin possesses the same zeal, but lays it on the line for all to see. There is no artifice, no subtlety. It’s all right there. So America, judge for yourself. If this woman is “right with you” to be vice president, then evangelical Christianity is even more frighteningly pervasive and powerful than I feared.

Frankly, candidates like Palin are the Jews’ worst nightmare. The sentiments she expresses are part of a vestigial memory we internalize about what intolerance and bigotry sounds like. We know it when we hear it. And we hear it here. Not perhaps, in full-bore anti-Semitic mode. But we know when we’re not wanted and as non-believers we’re not wanted in Sarah Palin’s theocratic world view.

We are a minority who in a way, lives on the kindness of strangers, to quote Blanche DuBois in Streetcar Named Desire. In the words of this candidate there can be no kindness for Jews, except as instruments of some Hagee-like plan to wreak destruction and redemption on the world.

John McCain till now had the highest poll ratings of a Republican presidential candidate in a long time (around 32%). No longer. With Palin on his ticket he can kiss much of that Jewish vote goodbye. Sure, he’ll still retain 15-20% of the hardcore true believers. But forget the rest. As Ben Smith writes about an e mail he received from the Republican Jewish Coalition touting Palin as a friend of Israel because her office has an Israeli flag on the wall:

…The fact that this tiny image [of an Israeli flag on her office wall] is the best the official voice of Republican Jewry has to defend Palin is a mark that McCain may have just helped solve Obama’s Jewish problem.

Bush’s War: Reading Behind the Images

Saturday, July 5th, 2008
1,200 U.S. military personnel re-enlist in Iraq on U.S. national holiday (Michael Kamber/NYT)

The front page of today’s NY Times features this image of 1,200 U.S. soldiers re-enlisting in one of Saddam’s former palaces yesterday in honor of our national holiday.  It’s clearly supposed to convey an image of strength, that our armed forces are doing something right in Iraq, that our own personnel have so much confidence in our efforts that they’re willing to re-enlist.  It’s really a great piece of PR puffery.

But what does it miss?  That the Pentagon is often missing its recruitment targets to fill places in the volunteer army.  That it has continually betrayed faith with serving soldiers by extending tours of duty.  That our government has betrayed the faith of our armed forces by providing no exit strategy or even draw-down strategy for those stationed in combat zones like Iraq and Afghanistan. 1,200 have re-enlisted. But what about the troops not in the picture. What do they feel about their assignment? And what about the 4,000+ who aren’t coming home?

Like everything coming from this Administration, this image needs to be re-read and re-interpreted in light of the story it doesn’t tell.

Perle: Road to Neocon Hell Paved With ‘Very Best of Intentions’

Wednesday, May 30th, 2007

Richard Perle ran a fool’s errand by attempting to defend U.S. foreign policy before an audience of Guardian readers in England yesterday night. Since he admits he failed miserably, he thought the second time might be the charm, so he wrote a Comment is Free blog post: We Had the Very Best Intentions. To which I reply: “The Road to Hell is Paved With…”

Does this joker really think having pure intentions should win him any points in this foreign policy debate? What about proper planning and execution? What about understanding what one’s limits should be?

Cheney and the ‘Dirty’ Iraq Timetable Bill

Sunday, April 15th, 2007

I was struck by Cheney’s language in the following quote from a TV interview today:

Vice President Dick Cheney said in an interview broadcast Sunday that Congressional Democrats were irresponsible for using a war spending bill to set a timetable for withdrawing troops from Iraq. He said he was “willing to bet” that the Democrats would eventually cave in to President Bush’s demands for legislation with no strings attached.

Vice President Dick Cheney on Saturday at a taping for “Face the Nation,” which was broadcast Sunday. The vice president said that Democratic efforts to set a deadline for withdrawal from Iraq were irresponsible.

“I think the Congress will pass clean legislation,” Mr. Cheney said in the interview broadcast on the CBS News program “Face the Nation,” adding, “I do believe that positions that the Democratic leaders have taken, to a large extent now, are irresponsible.”

Which means that legislation containing a timetable must be ‘dirty.’ There’s only one thing that’s dirty around here and it’s not an Iraq timetable–it’s Dick Cheney’s increasingly unconvincing manipulation of the English language for political advantage. It doesn’t fool anyone anymore. Not even the conservatives who used to be with him on the war.

Performance Optimization WordPress Plugins by W3 EDGE