Mahzor

New York Public Library

Churches

Sarajevo Haggadah

Mah Nishtanah

Sarajevo haggadah

Antaea Darom

Israeli women's art

Action

Torah as music

Ben Heine

Action

ceramic bowl

Mohammad Said Kalash, "Offering Reconciliation" exhibit (photo: Ilan Amihai)

Action

Punch and Judy/Pinchas and Jamila

Avi Katz

Action

David Grossman

Ben Heine

Action

Eldrige Street shul

Lower East Side

Action

Dove

Ben Heine

Action

Two birds

Hoda Jamal

Action

Israeli and Palestinian boys

from documentary, Promises

Action

Cat in the Hat

Yiddish version

Action

Daylight through the Wall

Banksy: graffiti art on Separation Wall

Action

Maurice Sendak's Brundibar set

New Victory Theater (photo: Nan Melville/NYT)

Action

Daniel Barenboim, West-Eastern Divan Orchestra

Palestinian-Israeli musical ensemble (photo: Kerstin Joensson/AP)

Action

Great Day on Eldrige Street

N.Y.'s klezmer greats celebrate shul rededication (photo: Leo Sorel)

Action

Joint Appeal for Peace

(Avi Katz)

Joint Appeal for Peace

Ketubah, Ancona, Italy (1772)

(Jewish Theological Seminary library)

Ancona ketubah

Posts Tagged ‘im tirzu’

Jewish Agency PR Flack Defends Hagee Gift to Im Tirzu

Saturday, August 21st, 2010

A few days ago the Israeli financial blog Calcalist published an expose (English translation) on a $3-million gift by John Hagee’s Christians United for Israel, which was passed through the Jewish Agency via the Houston Jewish federation where it originated.  I’ve reported in the past on the beneficiaries of tens of millions of dollars of Hagee/CUFI largess which are often settler projects and major settlements.  The gift Calcalist was most interested in was $120,000 transmitted to the far-right Israeli group, Im Tirzu.

Among other violations of Jewish Agency procedure concerning this gift and noted by the Israeli blog was that its funding is supposed to support educational projects, which it does in many cases.  But the notion that there is any educational component to Im Tirzu’s agenda is laughable.  It is a purely partisan entity characterized by bare-knuckle, brawling-style political activism as evidenced by its scuzzy attacks on the New Israel Fund‘s Naomi Hazan and its nascent campaign to sack the leadership of Ben Gurion University’s political science department for alleged “anti-Zionist” tendencies.

Israel has (or once had, before major cuts in the national education budget) a fine higher education system developed over decades and nurtured in the principles of academic inquiry and the freedom to pursue knowledge in diverse ways.  Im Tirzu, if it had its way, would turn the Israeli educational system into cheerleaders for an ideologically correct pro-Zionist agenda.  They would destroy the notion of academic freedom which is the pillar of any good university.  And the Jewish Agency is willing to financially pimp on behalf of this garbage.

Just after I published my post on this, I noticed that Haviv Rettig Gur asked to friend me on Facebook.  I remembered he was at one time a Jerusalem Post reporter, one of the interchangeable set which vent their noxiousness under the tutelage of queen bee neocon ranter-editor, Caroline Glick.  I wondered why he wanted to friend me.  After I confirmed him as a friend I received a message from him on my Wall sternly admonishing Calcalist and, by inference, me for “profound and irresponsible ignorance” in our reporting on Hagee’s gift.

In his initial message he wanted to make the point that the Jewish Agency wasn’t endorsing Hagee’s gift or Im Tirzu, but was merely providing “philanthropic oversight,” which in a later message he described as follows:

In order to enable contributions to charities and Israeli civil society from abroad, the Federations, the UIA and the Agency provide a special program of financial oversight. This program is trusted by the American authorities, so that when we say the money arrived at its destination and is used for its intended purpose, they believe us and the donor back home can receive the tax benefits of his or her donation.

Translation: the Jewish Agency passes money from Hagee along to Im Tirzu.  Further, the Houston federation sends the check to the JA, which in turn transfers it to Im Tirzu.  Which means the Agency, in doing so, gives Hagee and his dirty anti-Semitic money an Israeli-Zionist heksher in addition to a 501c3 designation making it tax-deductible.

Here Rettig Gur argues that Israel should be proud of Hagee’s beneficence:

Hagee, for his part, uses the [JA pass-through] service for gifts for which Israel should be deeply grateful. Hagee’s own Israel portfolio…included last year a $750,000 gift to Barzilai Hospital, among others. Ironically, Im Tirzu’s latest target, Ben Gurion University, also received money from Hagee.

Again, this is self-serving pap.  If you read the post I wrote on Hagee’s Israel giving, anyone can see that the preponderance of his charity is to the settlement enterprise.  Yes, he does give to glatt kosher non-profits like hospitals and he does give major gifts for aliya absorption, but it doesn’t cancel out his massive giving to support the “don’t give an inch” brigade.  As for Ben Gurion University, I think it’s safe to say next year BGU won’t be receiving a red cent (or agora) from the likes of Hagee since he’ll certainly want to honor Im Tirzu’s version of pro-Zionist BDS.

Rettig Gur argues additionally that Hagee’s gift to Im Tirzu is no different from gifts it designates for “leftist” Israeli groups as well such as Bustan and Shatil.  The mere fact that Im Tirzu is a Zionist group gives it immediate approval.  No mention, in this line of argument, of the Agency’s requirement that funds only be given for educational purposes.  Further, the so-called leftist groups he mentions are not engaged in intimidation or incitement against anyone.  They don’t pay for full-page ads in all the major Israeli papers picturing Naomi Hazan with a rhino-horn on her nose in a Shturmer-like pose.  Nor do they extort Zionist-correctness from Israeli universities.  In fact, Bustan and Shatil are engaged in the important work of building Israeli democracy through empowering Bedouin communities (on the one hand) and promoting social justice for underprivileged sectors of Israeli society (on the other).  These are positive and constructive goals in which no one is smeared, no one is sacked from their job.  You can’t say the same for Im Tirzu.

The Jewish Agency PR flack argued that the story of Hagee’s gift was “old news” because Didi Remez had reported it on his blog in February.  What this conveniently ignores is that Didi did not know at the time that the gift was funneled to Israel via the Jewish Agency and Houston federation.  That is BIG news.  News that it is Rettig Gur’s job to minimize as insignificant.  Additionally, Calcalist reported that the Central Fund of Israel, an American Jewish pro-settler group sent $35,000 to Im Tirzu.  None of this was reported by Didi.  So the term “scoop” used by Calcalist, and which so annoys Rettig Gur, is a precise and correct term.

My trusty correspondent also takes humbrage that I’ve implicated his boss, Natan Sharansky, in the matter by mentioning him in my first post.  I merely noted that Hagee would surely feel right at home trusting his money to be channeled through an agency directed by the Israeli neocon, Sharansky.

Rettig Gur closed his last message (undoubtedly there will be more as he seems to have an inveterate need to explain and defend himself and his employer) with a strange set of near-non sequiturs intended to buff his Israeli liberal street cred:

I’ll accept your apology for sullying my good name, and happily respond to any further concerns. Funny, I have some good friends in places like B’tselem, Van Leer and ACRI. My father was a parliamentary aide to Yossi Sarid as far back as the 1970s and was a board member of RHR for a while. In all my life, no one from that world has ever been as rude and crude to me as you, and you’ve never even met me.

Why does someone like this feel he is owed any special treatment?  Why should I treat him with kid gloves when he aids and abets the likes of John Hagee and Im Tirzu?  So I replied:

You can accept my apology if you wish to be a fantasist. But you won’t be getting an actual apology from me any time soon. There is always time to repent from your embrace of scum like Im Tirzu. But I doubt you’ll ever do so. When you do, then let me know and I’ll concede teshuva is a concept that works in your case. Till then, you’ll have my consistent criticism of you and JA.

Oh, and isn’t that nice ‘some of your best friends are Negroes.’ How sweet and condescending. You’re really a good guy aren’t you? Liberal & all.

Your father was an aide to Yossi Sarid 40 years ago & you want a pass because of that? What have you done lately? Not your father, you.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Hudson Institute Funds Extremists Seeking Destruction of Israeli Academic Freedom

Saturday, August 21st, 2010

The Hudson Institute, founded by Herman “Thinking the Unthinkable” Kahn and peopled by the hottest names in neocon-dom, is attempting to work its magic on Israel.  According to Didi Remez’s Coteret blog, Hudson is heavily funding two Israeli extremist groups which are targeting Israeli higher education by demanding the firing of “left-wing” professors considered hostile to Zionism.  They also want to “reform” the teaching of Zionism in the social sciences by removing “anti-Zionist” materials from the syllabi and removing unconventional or dissident ideas as well.  This is the thought police run amok.  This is David Horowitz with a Hebrew accent.  This is Campus Watch and the David Project translated to an Israeli context.

The right-wing Institute is providing $500,000 to the Institute for Zionist Strategies, an Im Tirzu look-alike which is, like its ideological twin, pressuring Israeli universities (in IZS’s case Tel Aviv University) to review and adjust its curricular offerings corresponding to the former’s partisan orientation.  The pressure has worked in the case of TAU, whose president has asked to review the course offering of the sociology department after a complaint that it was infested by “post-Zionist” thinking.  The group defines the latter as:

…The pretense to undermine the foundations of the Zionist ethos and an affinity with the radical leftist stream.

IZS was founded by Yisrael Harel, a settlement leader and (wonders never cease) a Haaretz columnist.  Harel’s got TAU’s knickers in such a knot that the University president is actually reviewing individual course syllabi:

The university has stated that since this is Klafter’s first year as president, he is intensively studying what is being taught at the university, and this includes reviewing course syllabi.

One wonders whether there isn’t an Israeli institute for new university presidents where they can go to learn how to do their jobs.  Leadership 101 would teach them that this isn’t their job, but rather the job of the department heads who are designated by him and his subordinates.  When presidents are doing what this guy is doing they’re either running way scared or simply don’t know shit from shinola about being a president.

For those of you who studied the McCarthy era in your American history classes, the following quotation will remind you of that speech in Wheeling, WVA where the senator screamed there were 53 known Communists (the number kept increasing with each speech he made thereafter) in the State Department.  Here Haaretz is referring to a “report” written by IZS “analyzing” sources used by the sociology department:

The paper says final figures from the courses examined shows syllabi contained 146 sources the authors defined as Zionist and 440 sources deemed post-Zionist.

Those of you who know the courageous role that Yehuda Shenhav has played both as a TAU professor and human rights activist will gather that the following was intended as a bitterly ironic statement:

…Shenhav, one of the professors whose course reading list was requested, said: “I have no doubt that the president…requested [the syllabi] to protect academic freedom against McCarthyism.”

As they say in Hebrew: Ha’levay (roughly translated as “I’ll bet”).

If any of this is reminiscent of the work of Im Tirzu, which has been busy wreaking similar havoc on the political science department at Ben Gurion University, it could be because Ronen Shoval, the group’s founder, learned his trade at workshops sponsored by IZS.  What makes this even stranger is that Shoval has previous denied such collaboration between the groups as has IZS.  But the fact of the matter is that the terms of the attacks, the concepts utilized in the reports which criticize the various academic departments, all of this points to the groups aping each other’s tactics:

Not only is the methodology of the two reports identical (an examination of syllabi and a classification of lecturers into categories such as “Zionist” and “anti-Zionist” ), but the conclusions they reached about the state of Israeli academia are similar.

IZS’ advisor committee includes such noteworthy Israeli neocons as Michael Oren, Moshe “Bogie” Yaalon, Natan Sharansky, and Ron Baratz.  Baratz was the academic fig leaf who served as mashgiach for the Im Tirzu hit job on Ben Gurion University.  Baratz also let out a geshrei when the Hebrew University’s philosophy department declined to renew his one-year adjunct lecturer appointment, claiming his “firing” resulted from ideological bias (interesting that the subject of ancient Greek philosophy could be approached through an ideological bias).

meyrav wurmser

Meyrav Wurmser, doyenne of pro-Israel neocondom, funder of attacks on Israeli academia

Hudson’s generosity toward IZS stems at least in part from the former’s senior fellow, Meyrav Wurmser, one of the foremost pro-Israel neocons in Washington, a former Bush administration apparachik, former director of the anti-Arab media outlet, MEMRI, and wife of David Wurmser.  The latter was a colleague of Doug Feith in the Bush Defense Department.  Or to paraphrase Stan Laurel: “That’s a fine kettle of pro-Israel fish you’ve gotten us into, Ollie.”  Ms. Wurmser is the founder and director of Hudson’s Center for Middle East Policy.

Remez writes that neither IZS nor Hudson note on their respective websites the web of financial support woven between the two groups.  The former’s website notes in Hebrew that its donor data is “private,” while in English it claims that support derives from an IZS Friends group.  You’d have to examine the IRS 990 report and Israeli government funder report in order to learn this information.  Certainly not the finest example of philanthropic transparency.

Ironically, Im Tirzu, NGO Monitor and none other than IZS are the godfathers of the new Knesset bill which will require “transparency” from Israeli NGOs like the New Israel Fund and B’Tselem, which allegedly receive “tainted” donations from foreign sources hostile to Israeli Zionism.  One wonders whether the law will somehow exclude IZS from its scrutiny or whether the latter will suddenly get religion and bring its own accounting into line with the proposed law.

uzi arad

Uzi Arad, Bibi's national security Rasputin, gone over to the Dark Side

Hudson also donated $600,000 to the Atlantic Forum of Israel in 2007, which Didi characterizes as “an opaque, security oriented organization” founded by Bibi Netanyahu’s national security Rasputin, Uzi Arad.  Arad, in his past life a Mossad operative, is accused of being instrumental in the Larry Franklin/Aipac spy case.  For a time during the Bush administration, Arad was persona non grata in Washington.  In one of its less intelligent moves, Obama opened its arms to Arad after Bibi elevated him to the national security advisor role in his new government.  We can charitably say about Arad that he long ago went over to the Dark Side.

Though the Atlantic Forum’s website is under construction, the American Jewish Congress described the former as Israel’s “non-governmental representative to NATO.”  In other words, a repository for all manner of Israeli spookdom on European soil.

What is interesting here is that the Hudson Institute clearly favors attacking Iran.  Uzi Arad, who stepped down from his leadership role at the Forum on joining the government, favors attacking Iran.  U.S. government policy (at this time) opposes attacking Iran.  Which means that a U.S. neocon think tank has teamed up with the current Israeli national security advisor to advocate a position at odds with U.S. foreign policy.  Nothing illegal about that.  But Didi and I think both the U.S. and Israeli publics deserve the right to know about such tag team wrestling duos attempting to wreak havoc with U.S. policy.  Further, I think this makes Hudson an agent of Israeli influence (and vice versa).

Enhanced by Zemanta

Im Tirzu Accuses Israeli Blogger of Incitement to Murder

Thursday, August 19th, 2010
yossi gurvitz

Yossi Gurvitz, my friend and alleged inciter to murder

My friend, Dena Shunra brought me word of the amazing news that our mutual friend, Yossi Gurvitz, who writes the Hebrew language blog, Friends of George, has been accused of incitment to murder.  Though I have never met Yossi personally, from the writing in his blog and his picture there, he appears to be a pipe-smoking, bohemian (possibly) and totally harmless (physically) individual.  How the lunatics of Im Tirzu can turn him into a potential murderer is little short of astounding.

It appears that Yossi is caught up in a larger game Im Tirzu is playing in which it seeks to smear New Israel Fund, a battle that has raged in Israel for months.  I’ve reported here on the Shturmer-like demonization to which Naomi Hazan was subjected in the pages of all the major Israeli newspapers.  Well, it appears that Yossi spoke at a New Israeli Fund conference for Israeli bloggers in which, according to the rightist Yisrael HaYom, he said he was eager to “get to the meat of the matter and do battle with Im Tirzu.”  He further clarified that what he meant was to unmask the group’s funding sources.  In Hebrew, he used the term basar va’dam, meaning “body and blood” or, as I translated, meat of the matter.  So this is how a bunch of total meshugayim transform a call to political battle into a death threat.  Amazing, simply amazing.

I’ve got news for Im Tirzu–these guys are political neophytes or poseurs if they interpret that as a death threat.  I can send them some of mine, a few of which have been reported to the FBI, if they want to know the real thing.  The most recent one was posted recently by a Los Angeles commenter named Bacci40 at The Magnes Zionist:

…must kill dickie to know that he is irrelevant.

Now, that’s a death threat.

Yossi, enjoy the notoriety and may it bring you added visibility for your worthy commentary on the Orwellian threats to Israeli democracy.

Houston Jewish Federation, Jewish Agency Fund Im Tirzu’s Assault on Israeli Universities

Tuesday, August 17th, 2010
hagee gift to im tirzu

Gifts by John Hagee and Central Fund of Israel to Im Tirzu

What do the Houston Jewish federation, the Jewish Agency, John Hagee, and Im Tirzu have in common?  They’re all either directly or indirectly funding a major assault on academic freedom on Israeli campuses.

Im Tirzu is on the warpath once again.  Not to be outdone by the BDS movement, one of whose tools is an academic boycott of Israel, the Israeli rightist group has threatened the president of Ben Gurion University–if she doesn’t depose the current leadership of the political science department and reform the “anti-Zionist” syllabi of its courses that it will begin a campaign to convince donors to stop giving and students to stop enrolling.

Since the Knesset is considering a cockamamie bill punishing any Israeli who supports a boycott of Israel, perhaps the good solons might want to consider including Im Tirzu in the list of those who could be punished.  I’d think that supporting an academic/fundraising boycott of Ben Gurion University might enable faculty there to make a plausible legal case that their institution suffered tangible damaged by Im Tirzu’s assault.

The Israeli finance website, Calcalist, reports (Hebrew) that John Hagee donated $120,000 to Im Tirzu in 2009 through the Jewish Agency.  The money had been transferred to the Agency by the Houston Jewish Federation as part of an overall $5-million gift.  $3-million of that came from CUFI and went towards its largely pro-settler Israel philanthropy.  Hagee passed the gift through the Agency in order to qualify for a U.S. tax deduction.  The Israeli site also notes that the Central Fund of Israel, a pro-settler fund supported by American Jews, donated $35,000 as well.  I reported some of this earlier in this post.  But what I’m trying to discover is whether the funds reported on by the Calcalist are independent of the $200,000 in Hagee gifts I reported earlier.  I suspect that they may be since there was no mention concerning the earlier gift that it was a pass-through via the Jewish Agency.

The Israeli website notes that the Agency is only supposed to act as pass-through for donations to “non-political” Israeli groups.  I wonder how they fudge this one concerning one of the most hardline political groups currently functioning in Israel?  Further the Agency is only supposed to accept funds for projects that are directly connected to its work.  So does this mean that Im Tirzu is a project under the official auspices of the Agency?  Or has someone there fudged those inconvenient rules again?  Further, the funds provided to the Zionist-Brut group were supposed to be used for “educational” purposes.  Instead, they were used to support political activism.  They went for salaries and covering other organizational expenses.

Is it any accident that the Jewish Agency’s chair is Natan Sharansky, doyen of the Israeli right, and affiliated with the Likudist Shalem Center.  The latter is heavily funded by American Jewish gambling magnate Shelly Adelson, an ardent funder of Bibi Netnayahu’s political career.

A second article in the Calcalist makes this important point:

The Jewish Agency supports organization’s from the Israeli lunatic right, which are attempting to destroy the values of academic freedom in Israeli higher education.  The Agency, a body whose mission it is to bring new immigrants to settle in the Holy Land, instead transfers very large sums to poisonous organizations which seek legitimacy in attacking academics who’ve actually done something in their lives, having not just written propaganda exposes divorced from any reality.

The columnist concludes by noting the absolute insanity of the Jewish Agency providing funding to an organization that wishes to unleash the thought police on Israeli universities.  You’d think the Agency’s mandate would be to improve the quality of life in Israel rather than attempt to destroy one of the jewels of the Israeli state (well, perhaps a bit tarnished, but still the universities are key national institutions).

Will anyone in Israel make Ronen Shoval and his jackbooted friends in Im Tirzu explain why they are accepting a single kopek from a crazy Texas preacher who says Hitler was half-Jewish, that the latter and the Holocaust were sent by God in order to create the State of Israel, and that the Rothschild’s were part of an international economic conspiracy???

Rightist Philosophy Lecturer Dismissed by Hebrew University

Saturday, July 24th, 2010
ran baratz

Ran Baratz: victim of Israeli academic political correctness or self-immolated on the altar of right-wing ideology?

The Philosophy department at the Hebrew University recently dismissed Ran Baratz, a lecturer on Greek philosophy.  And ever since, the Israeli media has been in a mini-uproar.  The Knesset’s Education Committee will take up the affair.  According to Maariv and other publications, Baratz was let go because he violated the leftist academic code prevailing in Israeli academic institutions.  Here’s how Maariv breathlessly portrayed Baratz’s “sacking (Hebrew):”

Stormy winds are blowing through the humanities faculty of the Hebrew University after it ended the employment of a popular lecturer.  Dr. Ran Baratz will not return for the coming academic year due to his affiliation with the right-side of the political map…

If you’re right-wing, so the prevailing wisdom goes, you have no hope of a career or academic advancement in Israel.

Let’s examine the facts more closely.  According to a senior faculty member at a major Israeli university who has some familiarity with the case, Baratz taught there as what here in the U.S. would be called an adjunct.  He had a temporary low-level appointment (what is called in Hebrew amit-hora’ah); such appointments are always short-term (usually one year, but in Baratz’s case it was only one semester) and may or may not be renewed, depending on budget and such things.  There’s always considerable flux with these adjunct appointments, especially since the budgets keep shrinking.

Baratz hoped his teaching gig would turn into a tenure-track position. However, a very fine candidate applied, with a strong CV, good list of publications, and was appointed. Baratz himself had no publications and was in no position to compete.

Casting further doubt on Baratz’s claim, the Hebrew University faculty of humanities is not noted for its solidarity with the left and the peace camp.

We should also examine whether Baratz may have his own personal motives for turning this into an ideological, rather than a purely professional decision.  First, he is the “academic advisor” to Im Tirzu, a foul Israeli smear outfit whose goal is to act as mashgiach (a rabbi who determines whether food is kosher) for Israeli professors and their courses according to the level of Zionist kashrut they represent.  The group recently published a strange report which claimed to examine the course syllabi for academic courses for the Zionist or anti-Zionist content of the articles.  Naturally, it found a very high level of the latter in Israeli courses.  And guess who was the academic advisor for this “report?”  The good doctor Baratz.

He is also a regular contributor to Yisrael HaYom, a daily paper also known as Bibi-ton for its slavish adulation of the current prime minister.

He is also a post-doctoral fellow at the Likudist Shalem Center. The Center has created Shalem College, a faux academic program which aims to glorify the place of Israel and Zionism in the western academic canon.  Here is what I wrote about this subject a few months ago:

Concerned that Israeli universities are a hotbed of Israel-hatred and unwilling to develop a ideological cadre of sufficiently pro-Israel students, the Center has applied to the Israeli educational authority for approval to launch its own rightist undergraduate program, Shalem College.

The college’s own mission statement lays out its curricular goals–among them to give:

Expanded attention to Western texts and traditions that permit a more fruitful dialogue with Jewish tradition. The college will relate to a wider selection of Western traditions than has become fashionable in many leading universities, including: treatment of the tradition of Western nation states as a legitimate alternative to expressly internationalist goals and values

No doubt, someone of Baratz’s ideological proclivities would be much more comfortable in this academic setting than at the Hebrew University, where he would have to grapple with some of the “expressly internationalist goals and values.”


Seattle Conference: Gaza Humanitarian Crisis

Sunday, June 27th, 2010

Yesterday night, 200 people joined us for the conference I initiated, Gaza’s Humanitarian Crisis: the Failure of U.S. Policy. I was delighted with the turnout and the quality of the talks by Steve Niva, David Schermerhorn, and Hazim Shafi.

This event was, in a way, a sequel to an event I organized last December on the Iran nuclear crisis and the failure of U.S. and Israeli policy in that arena.

When you blog as intensively as I do about the Israeli-Arab conflict and face an especially severe crisis, you want to do something more than just write a blog post. You want to go into your community and reach people where they live; motivate them to do something on behalf of sanity, justice and human decency.

That’s why I approached Brenda Bentz of SABEEL of Puget Sound with my idea, which she graciously supported along with St. Mark’s Cathedral, which provided the venue. I am sorry to say that Seattle’s Jewish community is not yet ready to confront these issues by hosting such a panel. Though through some lobbying of my own, the JTNews sent a reporter to the event and there will be a story about it in the next issue. I understand there were four “operatives” from Stand With Us in attendance as well. Undoubtedly, they were seeking proof that we were propagating “anti-Israel” propaganda.

Below, I’m going to post my own remarks from last night. When we have video, audio, or photos available, I’ll upload that as well:

Israel Under Siege–Enforces Consensus, Jettisons Democracy

I have the unenviable task of telling you tonight about the state of the State of Israel.  In short, it’s not good.  I’ve been following Israeli politics since I was a teenager in 1967 and I don’t think I’ve ever felt more alarmed and depressed about what is happening within Israel.

We all knew when Bibi Netanyahu became prime minister that we were in for a far-right government.  But sad to say I think we were spoiled by the more centrist governments that preceded them.  We thought that since both Ariel Sharon and Ehud Olmert were former Likud political leaders that Bibi would perhaps be a slightly more conservative version.

But Bibi has been a revelation, and not a good one.  Under his rule, the Israeli peace and human rights community have come under fire as never before.  The leader of the New Israel Fund, a relatively tame advocate of Israeli civil society and democracy, was vilified in all the major Israeli newspapers in an ad displaying a caricature of her with a rhino horn sprouting from her forehead.  It was an ugly display worthy of some of the lowest propaganda of the Nazi anti-Semitic publication, Der Shturmer.

A few months ago, Uri Blau, an Israeli journalist writing for Haaretz was forced into exile because he received secret documents from an IDF soldier named Anat Kamm.  These memos documented major military violations of an Israeli Supreme Court ruling barring targeted killings of Palestinian militants who could be apprehended non-violently.  Not only did the Israeli intelligence service, Shabak, threaten to prosecute Uri Blau, Haaretz’s military correspondent now residing in London, they did prosecute Kamm, threatening her with a life sentence.  Essentially, this woman is an Israeli Daniel Ellsberg, yet she faces calls from the Israeli far-right for hanging.

An Israeli Palestinian Knesset member, Haneen Zoabi, joined the Gaza flotilla and sailed on the ill-fated Mavi Marmara.  If she’d been a regular Israeli citizen she could’ve been arrested and imprisoned for her action.  Luckily for her, she had parliamentary immunity.  When she returned to the Knesset, right-wing MKs called her a traitor and killer.  She arose to defend herself and all hell broke loose.  A Jewish female Knesset member lunged at her and would’ve taken her down if she hadn’t been restrained by Knesset security.  Everyone knows how fractious and dysfunctional the Israeli parliament can be.  Many of us have seen the shouting matches and bad behavior.  But this was a different order of magnitude.  Even an Israeli TV newscaster called it a “near-lynching.”

The Israeli security apparatus has gone to war against Israeli Palestinian political leaders.  This goes back to an announcement in 2007 by Yuval Diskin, Shin Bet chief, that he planned to wage all-out combat against Palestinian nationalists.  He viewed even legal political activities that advanced views that were detrimental to the notion that Israel was solely a Jewish state, as anathema.  He made clear as part of this crusade, he would pull out all the stops.  And he has done so.

In the past month, the Shin Bet arrested the director of an Israeli Palestinian NGO named Ameer Makhoul.  They came to his Haifa apartment in the dead of night, ransacked it, and confiscated all the electronic equipment in it, including cell phones and computers belonging to his teenage daughters.  They slapped a gag order on his arrest.  No Israeli reporter could say what had happened to Makhoul.  He essentially disappeared into the maw of the secret police.

One of my jobs as a blogger is to break such gag orders and I’m pleased to say that with the help of Israeli sources I did.  After my reporting, we knew who had been arrested.  We found out about the preposterous charges against him, that he had consorted with known Hezbollah agents and offered to spy against his country.

The identity of the alleged Hezbollah agent was also under gag order.  But I broke that too and revealed that Hassan Jaja was so dangerous that he was a landscape designer and nurseryman in Amman who ran an Arab environmental NGO.

Despite the ludicrousness of the charges, this didn’t stop the Shin Bet from torturing Makhoul during the three weeks when they held him incommunicado, preventing access to his lawyers or family.  He was deprived of sleep, tied to a chair that was bolted to the floor and forced to confirm a narrative that his interrogators dictated to him.  It reminds me of a Teheran show trial.

This is how low Israel has gone.  In an effort to combat the international campaign to hold Israel accountable for its actions its actions in Gaza during Operation Cast Lead, the nation has inflicted upon itself and the rest of the world a sort of pathological madness.

It called Judge Richard Goldstone, author of the UN report on the war, a traitor to his people.  Accused him of a blood libel against Israel.  Accused him of being a moser, a Jew who during the Holocaust ferreted out Jews in hiding and betrayed them to the Gestapo.  They tarnished Goldstone’s record as a South African anti-apartheid judge by comparing him to Josef Mengele.

Some of us attended the last SABEEL conference held here in this Cathedral and heard Israeli Professor Neve Gordon’s address.  He, several months ago, electrified observers of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict by publicly expressing his support for the global BDS movement in the Los Angeles Times and The Guardian.  For this, he too was excoriated.  The president of Ben Gurion University where he teaches, claimed he had crossed a red line that no professor had a right to cross, doing damage to the State.  Israelis across the political spectrum attempted to make the case that academic freedom did not entitle someone to speak ill of Israel or Zionism.  They suggested not so subtly Gordon might be happier living elsewhere (a fate that befell Ilan Pappe and Tanya Reinhardt).

Ben Gurion’s President Carmi essentially said she would fire Gordon if she could.  But of course she couldn’t since there is such a thing as academic freedom still honored in Israel.

Add to this, the fact that a British trustee of Ben Gurion told a Jewish newspaper that Prof. David Newman, a colleague of Gordon’s should die because he criticized Israeli policy in a British TV documentary.  140 faculty members protested to the president about the trustee’s irresponsible statement and she promptly ignored them.

Speaking of dying, last week Neve Gordon received a bona fide death threat from an anonymous source, calling him a traitor and warning him that the writer would come to the campus and kill him.  While Pres. Carmi denounced the act, she also in effect blamed Gordon for bringing it on himself by his “irresponsible” behavior.

In light of the repression and paranoia I’ve outlined above, it isn’t surprising that the IDF perpetrated the debacle it did on the Mavi Marmara.  I don’t know exactly what happened.  But in the most charitable interpretation I imagine that after it faced resistance from some passengers and the belief among the assault team that some members were captured, I believe there was a general breakdown in unit discipline and chaos ensued.  While I don’t believe the IDF planned to execute anyone and engage in cold blooded murder, the stage was certainly set by spokespeople who threatened that Israel was prepared to use force to prevent the ships from reaching Gaza.

Now, a word on the Israeli investigation of this disaster.  In short, it too is a disaster.  Netanyahu has appointed three Israelis and two foreign “observers.”  The panel is chaired by Yaakov Tirkel, a 75 year old retired Supreme Court justice who has said publicly that he holds the honor of the IDF above “the enemy.”  The justice is known for siding with the government on national security cases.  Another Israeli panelist is Amos Horev, an 86 year-old retired general who, in 1943, was accused of castrating a Palestinian villager who sexually harassed a Jewish woman.  The third member is Shabtai Rosenne, a 94 year-old former diplomat who counseled the Israeli prime minister after the notorious Kibya massacre orchestrated by Ariel Sharon to lie to the world by claiming that Israeli civilians perpetrated the killings and not the army.  An Israeli newspaper photographed this poor man at his home wearing the type of summer shorty pajamas worn by elderly folks and tended by his Filipino caretaker.  I call this the geriatric commission.  They should hold the sessions in a retirement home rather than a government conference room.

One of the foreign observers, Lord David Trimble, just co-founded a European pro-Israel advocacy organization whose mission is to oppose “delegitimization” of Israel within Europe.  The second observer is a former judge in the Canadian army.

In short, the fix is in.  No one really believes this body will satisfy anyone except Israel.  Haaretz has editorialized to that effect.  Ban Ki Moon has warned the commission isn’t credible.  We need a true international investigation.  Nothing less will suffice.

Now, I’d like to turn to U.S. policy.  As an American Jew and supporter of Israeli-Palestinian peace, I had high hopes of Barack Obama.  I still do.  But I’ve become doubtful that any of those hopes will ever be realized.

When faced with the intransigence of the Israeli government, whether the settlement freeze, the Goldstone Report or the Gaza flotilla massacre, the operative mode seems to be keeping things quiet and under control.  There never seems to be backbone when it’s called for.

When the Goldstone Report was first issued, the U.S. attempted to block it and threatened a Security Council veto if it was brought up there.  When Turkey and the nations of the world demanded an international investigation of the Mavi Marmara murders, the U.S. said an Israeli investigation would do.  When things got hot and heavy in the aftermath of the killings and pressure mounted to end the Gaza siege, the Obama administration made do with merely easing the suffering rather than ending it completely.

This is an administration satisfied with half measures.  There are times when half-measures may work to quiet a crisis if it isn’t terribly severe.  But we’re way past severe when it comes to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.  The situation calls for backbone, for perseverance, for fortitude.  Instead we get waffling, and zig-zagging.

Finally, I want to note that today is the fourth anniversary of the capture of IDF soldier Gilad Shalit by Palestinian militants.  During that time, there have been negotiations between Israel and Hamas over his fate.  Essentially, the latter demanded the release of several hundred jailed Palestinians.  Israel balked.  While everything about the case is veiled in a fog, from what I’ve read the sides were close to agreement a number of times.  But negotiations foundered over which detainees would be released and how many.  Israel balked when faced with the prospect of releasing those with blood on their hands.

I want Gilad Shalit to return to the bosom of his family.   But I also want Israel to recognize Hamas and end its siege.  I want the residents of Sderot to be safe from Qassam rockets.  But I also want the residents of Gaza to be free from paralyzing fear and anticipation of the next war.

There is a way out of this mess.  The 2002 Saudi initiative proposed Arab acceptance of Israeli in return for a withdrawal to near-1967 borders.  Israel has rejected this peace plan, which is still on the table.  There is only one way to save Israel: to make peace.  Everyone knows the parameters of the future settlement.  The only question is how many will have to die before Israel comes to its senses and agrees to it.  To quote a Jewish saying: “may it happen speedily and in our day.”

Enhanced by Zemanta

Im Tirtzu Widens Assault to Israeli Universities

Monday, June 21st, 2010
neve gordon death threat

Neve Gordon death threat: 'Gordon: You are a traitor!! I will reach Ben Gurion to kill you.!! Signed--Im Tirtzu'

Im Tirtzu, the Israeli brass knuckles hasbara outfit, has expanded its campaign for mind control over the Israeli political debate by assaulting Israeli universities.  Until now, it had focussed much of its energy on attacking the New Israel Fund and other Israeli human rights NGOs for their alleged support of the Goldstone Report.  Now, they have widened the assault to include the political science departments of Israeli universities, which it views as being rife with anti-Zionist professors teaching left-wing propaganda to students and demanding that they parrot it back in return for good grades.

Among the unsupported (and unsupportable) claims leveled is that 80% of the material taught in political science courses is anti-Zionist or anti-Israeli. The entirely scientific method used was for two Israelis who somehow earned PhDs to divide up the course materials (articles, books, etc) into two categories: “Zionist” and “anti-Zionist” or “post-Zionist.”  How did they arrive at this distinction?

‘We used a single criterion,’ said Dr. Ron Bartz, ‘what was the stance of the author regarding the question of whether Jews have the right to a national state in the Land of Israel–yes or no.  Articles defined as Zionist were virtually non-existent in course syllabi.’

The report they wrote (pdf) found that of researchers who embraced the model of “a state for all its citizens” as opposed to those who embraced Israel as a Jewish state, articles reflecting the former perspective were found 24 times in course lists and articles reflecting the latter were only found 9 times.  Presumably Im Tirtzu views the former perspective as anti-Zionist and the former as Zionist, which of course isn’t necessarily the case.

I’m dying to see specific books and articles and how they categorized them.  This should bring a barrel of laughs.  Just as a ferinstance, Norman Finkelstein‘s work will of course fall into the anti-Zionist camp even though he supports a two-state solution.  You rapidly get an idea of how slanted Im Tirtzu’s methods are.

It’s rather odd to me that the newspaper article to which I link above claims that Drs. Ron Bartz and Uri Lebel “supervised” the report.  But their names are not listed as authors.  Indeed, no name is listed as far as I can see.  Which makes this document authorless and utterly lacking in any credibility.  Lebel, by the way, teaches at Ariel College, a settler institution established without academic certification.

An article in Yisrael HaYom, Israel’s Likudist daily underwritten by Shelly Adelson’s billions, also pointed to an seminar taught by Tel Aviv University Prof. Yehudah Shenhav on Government Bureaucracy and Human Rights.  What especially irked Im Tirtzu is the participation of Israeli human rights lawyer, Michael Sfard in the course and the fact that students would participate in projects organized by anti-Occupation human rights NGOs Machsom Watch and Yesh Din.  In another course, students were required to watch a documentary film featuring an interview with (has v’halila) Azmi Bishara and listen to a speech by left-wing Knesset member Dov Chenin.  Apparently, according to Im Tirtzu, teaching about these subjects in an Israeli university should be forbidden or at least balanced by an accompanying course that waves the white-and-blue fervently.

This entire exercise strikes me as a rip-off of Daniel Pipes Campus Watch.  In its report, Im Tirtzu even tracks student complaints filed against specific courses and professors, which is a tactic patented by Pipes’ crew.  I would be willing to wager that the Israeli group has consulted closely with Pipes and/or Charles Jacobs of The David Project.  This is yet another example of Israel importing some of the worst polemical tendencies of the American Jewish right.

education minister saar addresses im tirtzu

Education Minister Gideon Saar blesses Im Tirtzu (Haaretz)

Im Tirtzu has the ear of the right-wing political establishment.  Education Minister Gideon Saar, announced recently that he had a few surprises in store for academics who endorse the BDS movement (Neve Gordon, are you listening?).  It’s not clear what the government can do to punish such professors unless it wishes to violate principles of academic freedom; or whether it intends to punish the universities or departments via cutting off governmental subsidies.

A Kadima Knesset member had this delightfully witty analysis of the malady afflicting Israeli academia:

“Israeli academia apparently suffers from ‘Palestinomania,’ a mild psychological illness whose symptoms include self-hatred, an affinity for Israel’s enemies, Jewish anti-Semitism and/or anti-Zionism,” Shamalov Berkovich said in the Knesset. “The spread of ‘Palestinomania’ demands the immediate and painful treatment for all of our sake, and the sooner the better.”

Minister Saar earlier this year gave his papal blessing to the hooligans of Im Tirtzu when he addressed one of the conferences:

“I place great importance in this gathering,” he said. “Campus activism is hugely vital, and this is what you are doing. For this, you will be blessed.” “I very much appreciate this work, which gives expression to an authentic Zeitgeist felt by the public and is much-needed on our campuses,” Sa’ar said of Im Tirtzu. “I came to tell you: God speed.”

These threats against Israeli academia and specific researchers comes on the heels of the death threat sent to Prof. Neve Gordon which I feature here.  For those who seek to dismiss the seriousness of such gestures remember that wanted posters graced the streets of Jerusalem just before Prof. Zeev Sternhell was wounded by a pipe bomb likely delivered by accused settler serial killer Jack Teitel.  Hate like this is serious.  Not that this means the Israeli police will uncover the culprit/s.  They somehow often manage not to be able to solve such cases.

I wonder whether it’s getting to the point that Israel is turning into an inverted version of mullah-led Iran, where “dissidents” like Gordon come under a fatwa and need 24 hour security in order to protect them from settler crazies.  We’ve had an Israeli prime minister assassinated by such a one before.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Im Tirtzu Launches $600,000 Libel Suit Against Israeli Peace Activists

Thursday, May 27th, 2010

im tirtzu fascist movementRonen Shoval, the rightist leader of the uber-Zionist Im Tirtzu (“If You Want It”), has had enough of leftists making fun of him.  A Facebook group called Im Tirtzu–Fascist Movement arose to skewer I.T.  Then, horrors, a full-blown spoof website was created to lampoon the entire Im Tirtzu enterprise.  It was too much for poor Ronen.  He threatened to sue unless Didi Remez, one of the administrators of the Facebook site, apologized for his bad manners.

Didi told Ronen to take a hike in a meticulously argued legal brief submitted by his attorney, Michael Sfard.  The lawsuit is the result.  The claim is that by calling I.T. “fascist” they’re wrecking poor Ronen’s good name and reputation.  Keep in mind this is the group that put a rhino horn on Noami Chazan’s head in ads in every major Israeli newspaper that called New Israel Fund an enemy of Israel and the Jewish people.  Shoval is the same fellow who ran for the Knesset on a Kahanist-friendly party list.  The same guy who supported the diehard Gush Katif settlers who battled with the police against leaving Gaza in 2005.  This guy is no fascist, no.  He’s Theodor Herzl walking among us once more.  Im Tirtzu’s slogan is “the second Zionist revolution,” which knowing Shoval’s thuggery brings to mind Mao’s Red Guards and rivers of blood more than it brings to mind the Prague Spring.

'Whether You Want it or Not--a quiet fascist revolution,' spoof website

According to Israel’s Walla news portal, one of  Shoval’s claims is that the purpose of the Facebook group is to damage Im Tirtzu’s reputation (such as it is).  Duh!  Imagine that.  What’s this world coming to when you can’t call a flaming right wing racist what he really is.  And to think Didi Remez had the chutzpah to believe it was OK to besmirch Shoval in that way!

The suit also claims that the Facebook group uses “cheap demagoguery to create an ineradicable stain on the complainant’s reputation, which in the end will bring about its liquidation and the end of its impact on the public.”  Heaven forbid.  I know Didi Remez like I know my own brother and he would NEVER do such a thing.  Didi is a kind man, a good man, a lover of animals and even rightists.

Apparently, Ronen’s boys haven’t done their homework because their suit falsely claims that the Facebook group’s founders also created the spoof site, Whether You Want It or Not–the Quiet Fascist Revolution.

Walla also notes Shoval’s bullying of Hebrew Wikipedia for publishing an article calling I.T. a “right wing movement.”  Threat of a lawsuit was enough to persuade the crusading editors of Wikipedia to hide their heads in the sand and take down the article.  This would be like English Wikipedia taking down its article on the Tea Partyers because the group threatened a lawsuit for calling it right-wing.  The very notion seems preposterous.  But in Israel, where free speech and other democratic values are not rooted as deeply as here, intimidation by the well-heeled often works.  And Im Tirtzu is quite well-heeled thanks to a $200,000 gift from John Hagee’s Christians United for Israel.  Didi even reveals that I.T. had to plunk down a $10,000 deposit just to file its suit.  Apparently, Ronen thinks there’s going to be a satisfying legal payday in his future.

Roy Yellin, the founder of the Facebook group spoke sense in his Walla interview, welcoming the opportunity offered by Im Tirtzu to justify his claims about the group in court:

“The very nature of this lawsuit proclaims this group to be right-wing extremist, opposed to the value of free speech, and in favor of smearing left-wing organizations with the epithet ‘traitor,’ and in favor of the notion that these activists should ‘shut up and sit down.’”

Yellin claims that I.T. adopted tactics common in the U.S. of legal intimidation against individuals who express criticism of powerful figures or interests. Such tactics are not customary in Israel.

…Didi Remez’s attorney, in a letter to Shoval’s attorney welcomed an opportunity to allow an Israeli court to decide the case and to hear from Israeli and international experts on the question fascism and whether the word applies to Im Tirtzu.

I have to say it’s become a very intense time for lovers of peace and justice in Israel and the Diaspora.  It seems all the good values we ever associated with Israel are under assault and perhaps even dying before our eyes.  Im Tirtzu has its jack-booted heel on the throat of Israeli free speech and we can’t let them win.  That’s why we’ll be following this lawsuit closely and the escapades of those jolly fellows in Im Tirtzu as well.

I may not be a dragon-slayer.  But my goal is to even the playing field just a bit, so the bastards don’t get too smug and think they can trample on those of us who think differently than they do.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]