Mahzor

New York Public Library

Churches

Sarajevo Haggadah

Mah Nishtanah

Sarajevo haggadah

Antaea Darom

Israeli women's art

Action

Torah as music

Ben Heine

Action

ceramic bowl

Mohammad Said Kalash, "Offering Reconciliation" exhibit (photo: Ilan Amihai)

Action

Punch and Judy/Pinchas and Jamila

Avi Katz

Action

David Grossman

Ben Heine

Action

Eldrige Street shul

Lower East Side

Action

Dove

Ben Heine

Action

Two birds

Hoda Jamal

Action

Israeli and Palestinian boys

from documentary, Promises

Action

Cat in the Hat

Yiddish version

Action

Daylight through the Wall

Banksy: graffiti art on Separation Wall

Action

Maurice Sendak's Brundibar set

New Victory Theater (photo: Nan Melville/NYT)

Action

Daniel Barenboim, West-Eastern Divan Orchestra

Palestinian-Israeli musical ensemble (photo: Kerstin Joensson/AP)

Action

Great Day on Eldrige Street

N.Y.'s klezmer greats celebrate shul rededication (photo: Leo Sorel)

Action

Joint Appeal for Peace

(Avi Katz)

Joint Appeal for Peace

Ketubah, Ancona, Italy (1772)

(Jewish Theological Seminary library)

Ancona ketubah

Posts Tagged ‘im tirzu’

Bank Leumi, Faced With Prospect of Im Tirzu Winning Charity Competition, Cancels It

Sunday, December 11th, 2011
bank leumi 2 million reasons logo

Bank Leumi's '2 Mission Reasons' Competition logo

A few days ago Israeli customers of Bank Leumi raised a furor over the inclusion of the far-right nationalist group Im Tirzu within a supposed non-political charity competition designed to promote the work of Israeli NGOs.  The winning prize money totaled $500,000.  After customers began removing their accounts from the bank in protest, other supporters of Im Tirzu actually voted en masse for the group and raised its ranking from 7th place to 2nd place as of two days ago.

An Israeli reader of this blog commented a few days ago that everyone should vote for Im Tirzu in order to embarrass the bank.  Frankly, I thought the idea was cynical and felt it would be better to vote for other groups in opposition to Im Tirzu’s candidacy.  Apparently, Israelis agreed with my Israeli reader and pumped up the group’s numbers.  This had precisely the effect he envisioned.

Faced with the embarrassment of having to award nearly $100,000 to Im Tirzu if it actually won, along with the ensuing bad PR and customer withdrawals it would face, the Bank just decided to cancel the project entirely.  Otherwise, it would’ve become known as the Bank of Settlers, a corporate beacon for Israeli nationalist ideology.  It didn’t hurt the cause of protesters that they created a Facebook account called “Two Million Reasons to Leave Bank Leumi.”

The company’s blog, which takes a single line to announce the cancellation, expends an extraordinary amount of attention on praising the competition and its motives.  When it finally gets around to talking tachlis, this is what it says:

While we were trying to do good, we found ourselves the target of public criticism, which damaged the NGOs themselves.  A number of them came to us and said that the atmosphere created had cast a cloud on them and even harmed them.

Listening to the dialogue with our audience, we came to the conclusion that the model we created has not achieved its goal.  Therefore we’ve decided to cancel the project and examine ways in which we might better achieve its objectives in the future.

Not a word about Im Tirzu, nor a word about the politicization of the competition that was caused by including it.  The group will join all the others in receiving a $2,500 gift for its troubles.

Kol hakavod to Peace Now, which started the ball rolling, and to all the Israelis who protested this travesty and gained a victory in the war against Israeli bullies and ultra-nationalists like Im Tirzu.  Another attempt at what I call blue-and-white washing has failed.

Im Tirzu Participation in Bank Leumi ‘Non-Political’ $500,000 Charity Giveaway Provokes Outrage

Wednesday, December 7th, 2011
bank leumi im tirzu ad

Bank Leumi's ad as displayed in browser of Israeli reader earlier today, promoting charity giveaway

Bank Leumi has trumpeted a 2-million shekel charity giveaway (Hebrew) called “2-Million Good Reasons,” which allows their customers to direct gifts to a variety of Israeli NGOs and philanthropic organizations.  They include groups fighting hunger and promoting animal welfare, Ethiopian Jewry, the environment, youth, the physically-challenged, culture and arts, etc.  But there is one amazing group included on the list, the far-right nationalist, Im Tirzu.  I checked the other groups listed to see if any political groups were included.  There was only one even remotely so, dedicated to protecting the right to privacy.  New Israel Fund and Peace Now, of course, are not on the list.

In fact, the rules of the competition explicitly prohibit groups which have “political purposes,” which should rule out Im Tirzu.  The Bank somehow lists it as an “educational” group since its declared aim of “educating” (read, propagandizing) Israelis about Zionism might seem on its face fairly benign (at least to the average Israeli).  But most Israelis see through the disingenuousness of this claim, which is why so many customers are up in arms.

Interesting to note that Israeli readers of this blog have seen the Bank Leumi ad promoting this competition in my own sidebar (see screenshot displayed).

Today, Im Tirzu’s inclusion has become a cause celebre with articles in many newspapers and hostile comments burning up Bank Leumi’s Facebook page.  A significant number of angry customers are threatening to withdraw their accounts from the Bank.  Unfortunately, Israel does not present as many banking alternatives as the U.S.  There are, for example, no credit unions to which one can turn as the Occupy Wall Street protests urged supporters to do in protest of the role banks played in the housing and economic crisis.

The bank’s mealy-mouthed response was: our customers will vote on who receives funding.  In other words, if you don’t like Im Tirzu, vote for other groups and it will lose.  Which of course absconds from the main question: why is Im Tirzu on the list at all, since it’s the only overtly political group included?  Calcalist quotes the Bank attempting to qualify its rules by claiming that Im Tirzu is non-political because it is not affiliated with a political party or with the government.  That, of course, isn’t how the rules defined excluded groups.  And if it did, why not include NIF and Peace Now, which are also independent groups unaffiliated with parties or the government.  The Bank finally said simply: “They cannot be excluded.”

I am sorry to say that Calcalist reports that the Israeli far-right NGO is currently ranked 7th among all groups in the competition and would receive $10,000 if that was its final ranking.

Call to Close Ben Gurion University Department for Alleged ‘Leftist’ Bias

Friday, November 25th, 2011

The assault on academic freedom on Israeli campuses continues apace with a slimy report in Yediot Achronot which brays about a review of the department of politics and government at Ben Gurion University.  The committee appointed by the Israeli Council for Higher Education recommended closing the department for its so-called “extreme leftist tendency” if it didn’t mend the errors its ways.

The report, as portrayed in the article, seems astonishing in a number of ways (Dahlia Scheindlin has written about it here).  First, its contents seem heavily influenced by student evaluations of the program.  While student opinion should perhaps be a factor in such an evaluation, it should be a minor one at best since there are far more important factors in determining the quality of program.  But one thing the large amount of student input tells us is that the committee collaborated in ways large or small with Im Tirzu and other pro-Zionist academic advocacy groups which have been on the warpath regarding Ben Gurion in general and this program in particular.

I’ve written here about the University president’s invitation to faculty member Neve Gordon, to quit the school after he wrote a Los Angeles Times calling supporting the BDS movement.  Shortly after this controversy, the department responded to her high-handed tactics by appointing him its chair.  Now, it appears some in the University, Im Tirtzu and the Israeli far-right are taking the battle to a new venue.

Here are some of the real doozies in the Yediot article:

The department is known to have no small number of researchers with extreme leftist tendencies, who have expressed controversial views.

Among the views they featured were Neve Gordon’s supposed comments (and “radical ones” at that) during a class, that Gilad Shalit’s capture was not an act of terror, but rather a military attack.  Another faculty member, Danny Filk, organized official University meetings at which Im Tirzu claims only those from the “left camp” were permitted to address the gathering.

Another issue that bothered the committee was the faculty’s lack of care in making clear to students what their personal political views were in the course of classroom teaching.  Apparently, it believes that students aren’t able to distinguish between a professor’s politics and the course subject matter.  Nor did the reviewers like at all the supposed emphasis faculty made on political activism, which would distract from the serious pursuit of scholarly research.  They also claim that teachers do not represent a diverse set of views in their classrooms, but rather tend to present their own views and omit those conflicting with them.

Prof. Galia Golan, a member of the committee, disputed its findings, saying that the claim that the professors inserted their own views too prominently into the curriculum violated the fundamental value of academic freedom.

Scheindlin, in her 972Magazine post asked how could they know what ideas or values were espoused by professors in class when all of them, except for Golan, neither spoke nor read Hebrew.  Did they have classroom presentations translated for them into their native languages so they could evaluate?

She points out another coincidence: Education minister Gideon Saar is the chair of the Israeli Council on Higher Education and a devout supporter of Im Tirzu.  Could it be possible that the appointment of the committee was done at the behest of the minister and his friends in the far-right Israeli group?

The current department chair, Prof. Filk, dismissed the committee’s findings as a political witch hunt and noted that it was the most popular of its kind in any Israeli university.  He also noted that the evidence offered in the report was often faulty and simply wrong.  A senior member of the faculty went event farther:

This was an outside committee a portion of whose members have pronounced extreme right-wing views that created a reported fundamentally flawed.  Theirs is a political report whose agenda was to damage the department through exploitation of outside extremist groups [like Im Tirzu].

Prof. Carmi defended the department from charges that it wasn’t focussed enough on the traditional elements of the political science discipline by saying that this was precisely the mission of its program: to see the academic field from non-conventional, non-traditional viewpoints. This is why the faculty includes a medical doctor and architect among its members.

The truth is that for years now Im Tirzu and rightist Israeli academics have had it in for both the University and this department claiming it isn’t sufficiently “Zionist.”  That because it entertains views critical of Zionism or, God forbid, even anti-Zionist, that it departs from the national consensus.  Therefore a call for shutting down the program is music to their ears.  But as Galia Golan noted in her demurral, there is an even more important issue here: the critical need to support free inquiry and academic freedom.  In presenting their subjects to students and the wider world, they must do so in ways that are true to their own sense of themselves as academics and researchers.  They must not be pressured to present a certain point of view to the exclusion of others.

Eretz Nehederet: Im Tirzu Teaches Kindergarteners the Middle East Facts of Life

Friday, February 11th, 2011

Thanks to Israeli reader Nuriel for sending along a link for this segment from Eretz Nehederet, Israel’s highest rated political satire TV series.  It depicts an education curriculum devised by Im Tirtzu with the Ministry of Education that helps prepare kindergarten children for the “complicated reality” that is life in the contemporary Middle East.  It’s priceless:

To a Good, Sweet and Peaceful New Year

Wednesday, September 8th, 2010

Blessed are You God and may we have a good and sweet New Year!

rosh hashana apples and honey

Rosh Hashana tradition: apples dipped in honey

I hope you’re able to enjoy my favorite apple variety, Honeycrisp, and dip them in some local honey and enjoy that indescribable mix of sweet and sour that comes from a bite of apple dipped in honey.

May we have a year of hope, justice and peace.  And may all of my pessimistic prognostications be proven wrong.  And may Bibi Netanyahu realize the error of his moral blindness, break free of the yoke of his racist father, do teshuvah, and make peace.  I don’t know if stranger things have happened.  But peace is possible.  Whatever it takes.

Rothschild Vienna Mahzor

Melech or 'King' page from Rothschild Vienna Mahzor or High Holiday prayer book (Hebrew University)

The season of the New Year in Jewish tradition is a time of cheshbon nefesh, of spiritual stock-taking.  It is a time to examine our values and commitments and either change them or reaffirm them.  In the Jewish tradition, tzedekah is one of the key ways we express our values.  In my case, tzedakah reaffirms my commitment to tikun olam and social justice.

That’s why I want to reach out and ask all of you to open yours hearts and wallets to some worthy causes.  Two of them that have come under attack from the far-right, and which I’ve written about here are Cordoba House (Park51 Mosque) and New Israel Fund.

I’ve written about the millions which Aubrey Chernick has invested in portraying Islam to the world as a religion of hate and violence.  I’ve written about his funding of the efforts by Robert Spencer and Pam Geller to destroy the Cordoba Initiative, a project designed to bring Islam into dialogue with other religions like Judaism and Christianity.  One of the ways they smear the project is to predict the Arab terror money from Saudi Arabia and elsewhere that will be needed to finance the $100-million pricetag.  Well, let’s say to these asses that WE will give our money.  We who are neither terrorists nor ideologues in the Spencer-Geller mode, will open our hearts and wallets to the mission of Cordoba.  I’ve made my gift and I ask you to make yours.

My vision of Judaism is one of tolerance. There were times in Jewish history when anti-Semitism prevented Jews from building houses of worship in communities where they lived. Jews faced many of the same restrictions and prejudice that Muslims now face here. Why do we want to inflict on them what we ourselves suffered? Why do we want to view them with the same mistrust and ignorance we ourselves experienced? The High Holy Days should be a time for us to reaffirm our vision of a tolerant religious tradition open to engaging with other religions. Not a time for us to retreat into suspicion and recrimination.

I can only hope that rabbis will have the courage of their convictions (that is, those who have any) and seriously address this issue in their High Holiday sermons. And when they do or if they do, I hope not to hear jingoism, but profound spiritual introspection on the subject of religious tolerance.

For the past few months, I’ve written extensively on the attacks against Naomi Hazan and New Israel Fund by the Israeli far-right under the banner of Im Tirzu.  While I don’t always agree with all the views and decisions of the Fund, by God the enemy of my enemy is my friend.  And NIF is one of the few NGOs that is fighting on behalf of social justice in both the Israeli Jewish and Israeli Palestinian communities.  I will not let the demagogues and petty dictators of Im Tirzu tell me who is a kosher Zionist and who isn’t.  I won’t let them dictate the death of Israeli democracy.  I ask you to reaffirm your commitment to an Israel that is a state for all its citizens whether Jewish or Muslim by making a New Year gift.

Finally, I want you to do a little stock-taking regarding the value of this blog to you. If what I write is important to you, if it reflects your values, if you think I’m fighting the good fight–I ask you to open your heart and wallet to support the work I do here.  When I first started the blog in 2003 and hardly anyone seemed to be reading or caring, I kept going because writing this blog meant something to me regardless of what it meant to anyone else.  Now, I know that it means a great deal to many of you and I’m deeply grateful for that.  But think about the commitment of time and energy that writing this blog involves.  Think about the research, the writing, the thinking that goes into it.  If that means something to you, if you value it, reach into your pocket and show your support.  And a sheynem dank.  Gut yontof and Eid Mubarak.

New Israel Fund Caving to Im Tirzu Pressure?

Saturday, August 28th, 2010
New Israel Fund
New Jewish Israel Fund or Not Arab Israel Fund

The Forward brings distressing news that the New Israel Fund has prepared draft funding guidelines that would bar any Israeli NGO which did not endorse Israel as a Jewish state:

The New Israel Fund, the target of attacks by right-wing organizations accusing it of supporting anti-Zionist groups, is discussing the possibility of specifying in its guidelines that grants will be given only to groups that accept the idea of Israel as a Jewish homeland.

…According to three sources who have either seen the new proposed guidelines or were briefed on their content, the debate has also touched on the issue of defining the not-for-profit organizations that are eligible for receiving NIF grants. Board members and major donors are grappling with whether to require that grantees accept the idea of a two-state solution for the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, thus agreeing to the principle of Israel as a Jewish state.

I have had my share of disagreements with New Israel Fund, most significantly when it expelled Shammai Leibowitz from one of its fellowship programs after he spoke publicly on behalf of BDS and the story was picked up by Maariv’s resident red-baiter, Ben Caspit.  But I have, throughout the Im Tirzu attacks, stood by NIF and championed its cause.  But if it follows through on such guidelines it will have succumbed to the venom spewed by Im Tirzu.  It will have caved to pressure from the Israeli right to conform its mission to a pro-Zionist one, rather than one that embraces the notion of Israel as a state that empowers all its citizens, including those who are not Jewish.

There can be no doubt that there is any Israeli Palestinian group which NIF currently funds that can support the notion of Israel as a Jewish state.  Besides, this very notion is a condition demanded in the past by Bibi Netanyahu before he would negotiate with the Palestinians.  So in effect, if the NIF “goes there,” it will have adopted Bibi Netanyahu’s political agenda.  Can this be possible?  Is this what things have come to?  That the NIF, under enormous pressure from the Israeli right, determines that it must compromise with its values in order to appease its enemies?  Does NIF really believe this will protect it from the worst of the hatred coming its way?  Does it believe such policy changes will inoculate it from attack?

If this is what NIF’s leaders are thinking they are sadly mistaken.  If they cave, the right will see this as a sign of weakness and it will crowd in for what it hopes to be the kill.  And such compromise will destroy the organization’s credibility among its Arab donees.  Who in the Palestinian community will want to accept money from it under such conditions?

Thus, under attack from its right flank and its left, NIF will be buffeted by the political winds and have no clear course.  It will be a sad day if it happens.

The Forward mentions that there is compromise wording under consideration:

According to individuals who are involved in the process, one formulation being discussed is recognizing Israel as the “homeland” of the Jewish people — a description that falls short of the definition of Israel as a “Jewish state” but would avoid alienating Israeli-Arab not-for-profits that are on NIF’s grant list.

I should mention that this indeed is wording that I sometimes use in explaining my own Zionist philosophy with the addendum that I see Israel as the homeland of its Palestinian citizens as well.  Unless this proviso is included then even the compromise wording is offensive.  Besides, why should the NIF determine within its funding guidelines the nature of the Israeli state.  This, it seems to me, takes NIF far afield from its core mission which is to build Israeli democracy and social justice.

This quotation from a former president of the group indicates a leadership that has become unnerved and unmoored in response to the onslaught against it:

Peter Edelman, a former president of the NIF board, said in a brief interview with the Forward that revising the guidelines was “not necessarily in response” to criticism. Edelman added, however, that “when there is unjust criticism, then you want to be as clear as possible about the issues.”

This is a clarity that is unnecessary and which will not diminish the attacks.  It is a clarity that will drive away the Palestinian NGO community and render NIF less effective and less relevant in an Israeli context.  It is the NIF playing by the enemy’s rules–and losing.

Finally, the headline of the Forward article is: New Israel Fund Considering Red Lines, which should have much more appropriately been, New Israel Fund Considering Blue and White Lines. If it adopts these guidelines I’d suggest it change its name to the New Jewish Israel Fund or the Not-Arab Israel Fund, unwieldy perhaps, but very descriptive.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Houston Jewish Federation and Hagee End Funding for Im Tirzu

Sunday, August 22nd, 2010
im tirzu ad against naomi hazan

Im Tirzu's ad attacking Naomi Hazan

I would like to reach out my arms to dance a intercontinental hora with Didi Remez, the Calcalist, Yossi Gurvitz, and all those others who helped expose John Hagee’s $120,000 gift to Im Tirzu.  It seems that both the Houston federation and Hagee have gotten the message that Im Tirzu is not an educational organization providing Zionist training to Israel’s college students, but an outright ideological and highly partisan rightist political group.

One of my Facebook friends and a reader of my blog, Simcha Burstyn, brings this message from Houston federation CEO, Lee Wunsch:

We helped John Hagee Ministries fund Im Tirtzu as part of Pastor Hagee’s annual gifts to Israel. He funded Im Tirtzu because of its original mission of educating young Israelis on Israel’s college campuses about the history of Israel and Zionism. That funding continued for two years. In light of recent events and in my discussions with Pastor Hagee, he will not continue that funding as we both believe that Im Tirtzu has morphed into a quasi-political organization and neither Pastor Hagee nor the Houston Jewish Federation will fund such groups. If any of your friends want to communicate with me about their concerns, you are welcome to forward along this message and/or give them my contact information.

Lee Wunsch

tamir kafri im tirzu coordinator

Tamir Kafri, Im Tirzu's Ben Gurion University campus coordinator (Max Blumenthal)

We have won a victory in the fight for decency, human rights and derech eretz in the Israeli political debate.  Even as extreme a figure as John Hagee has red lines on such issues.  In truth, I doubt Hagee cared enough to make this decision.  In all likelihood it was the Houston federation that got cold feet.  But whoever it was they are to be commended for seeing reason.

This is perhaps not a big victory and shouldn’t be blown out of proportion.  After all, just look at the list of far-right settler groups which Hagee still supports:

Gush Katif, $200,000
Young Israel, $150,000
Shurat Ha-Din, $100,000
Nefesh B’Nefesh, $1,000,000 (settles new immigrants in settlements)
Ariel (settlement), $500,000
Gush Etzion, $150,000

But it’s a victory nonetheless.  And in this dark day and age even the small ones count.

Now, I challenge Haviv Gur, the Jewish agency communications director to renounce Im Tirzu as well.  If he won’t, will he tell us what redeeming value he finds in the group that the Houston federation missed in declaring it treif?  Wouldn’t you like to be a fly on the wall in the phone conversations that will go back and forth between Jerusalem and Houston on this one?

Enhanced by Zemanta

Jewish Agency PR Flack Defends Hagee Gift to Im Tirzu

Saturday, August 21st, 2010

A few days ago the Israeli financial blog Calcalist published an expose (English translation) on a $3-million gift by John Hagee’s Christians United for Israel, which was passed through the Jewish Agency via the Houston Jewish federation where it originated.  I’ve reported in the past on the beneficiaries of tens of millions of dollars of Hagee/CUFI largess which are often settler projects and major settlements.  The gift Calcalist was most interested in was $120,000 transmitted to the far-right Israeli group, Im Tirzu.

Among other violations of Jewish Agency procedure concerning this gift and noted by the Israeli blog was that its funding is supposed to support educational projects, which it does in many cases.  But the notion that there is any educational component to Im Tirzu’s agenda is laughable.  It is a purely partisan entity characterized by bare-knuckle, brawling-style political activism as evidenced by its scuzzy attacks on the New Israel Fund‘s Naomi Hazan and its nascent campaign to sack the leadership of Ben Gurion University’s political science department for alleged “anti-Zionist” tendencies.

Israel has (or once had, before major cuts in the national education budget) a fine higher education system developed over decades and nurtured in the principles of academic inquiry and the freedom to pursue knowledge in diverse ways.  Im Tirzu, if it had its way, would turn the Israeli educational system into cheerleaders for an ideologically correct pro-Zionist agenda.  They would destroy the notion of academic freedom which is the pillar of any good university.  And the Jewish Agency is willing to financially pimp on behalf of this garbage.

Just after I published my post on this, I noticed that Haviv Rettig Gur asked to friend me on Facebook.  I remembered he was at one time a Jerusalem Post reporter, one of the interchangeable set which vent their noxiousness under the tutelage of queen bee neocon ranter-editor, Caroline Glick.  I wondered why he wanted to friend me.  After I confirmed him as a friend I received a message from him on my Wall sternly admonishing Calcalist and, by inference, me for “profound and irresponsible ignorance” in our reporting on Hagee’s gift.

In his initial message he wanted to make the point that the Jewish Agency wasn’t endorsing Hagee’s gift or Im Tirzu, but was merely providing “philanthropic oversight,” which in a later message he described as follows:

In order to enable contributions to charities and Israeli civil society from abroad, the Federations, the UIA and the Agency provide a special program of financial oversight. This program is trusted by the American authorities, so that when we say the money arrived at its destination and is used for its intended purpose, they believe us and the donor back home can receive the tax benefits of his or her donation.

Translation: the Jewish Agency passes money from Hagee along to Im Tirzu.  Further, the Houston federation sends the check to the JA, which in turn transfers it to Im Tirzu.  Which means the Agency, in doing so, gives Hagee and his dirty anti-Semitic money an Israeli-Zionist heksher in addition to a 501c3 designation making it tax-deductible.

Here Rettig Gur argues that Israel should be proud of Hagee’s beneficence:

Hagee, for his part, uses the [JA pass-through] service for gifts for which Israel should be deeply grateful. Hagee’s own Israel portfolio…included last year a $750,000 gift to Barzilai Hospital, among others. Ironically, Im Tirzu’s latest target, Ben Gurion University, also received money from Hagee.

Again, this is self-serving pap.  If you read the post I wrote on Hagee’s Israel giving, anyone can see that the preponderance of his charity is to the settlement enterprise.  Yes, he does give to glatt kosher non-profits like hospitals and he does give major gifts for aliya absorption, but it doesn’t cancel out his massive giving to support the “don’t give an inch” brigade.  As for Ben Gurion University, I think it’s safe to say next year BGU won’t be receiving a red cent (or agora) from the likes of Hagee since he’ll certainly want to honor Im Tirzu’s version of pro-Zionist BDS.

Rettig Gur argues additionally that Hagee’s gift to Im Tirzu is no different from gifts it designates for “leftist” Israeli groups as well such as Bustan and Shatil.  The mere fact that Im Tirzu is a Zionist group gives it immediate approval.  No mention, in this line of argument, of the Agency’s requirement that funds only be given for educational purposes.  Further, the so-called leftist groups he mentions are not engaged in intimidation or incitement against anyone.  They don’t pay for full-page ads in all the major Israeli papers picturing Naomi Hazan with a rhino-horn on her nose in a Shturmer-like pose.  Nor do they extort Zionist-correctness from Israeli universities.  In fact, Bustan and Shatil are engaged in the important work of building Israeli democracy through empowering Bedouin communities (on the one hand) and promoting social justice for underprivileged sectors of Israeli society (on the other).  These are positive and constructive goals in which no one is smeared, no one is sacked from their job.  You can’t say the same for Im Tirzu.

The Jewish Agency PR flack argued that the story of Hagee’s gift was “old news” because Didi Remez had reported it on his blog in February.  What this conveniently ignores is that Didi did not know at the time that the gift was funneled to Israel via the Jewish Agency and Houston federation.  That is BIG news.  News that it is Rettig Gur’s job to minimize as insignificant.  Additionally, Calcalist reported that the Central Fund of Israel, an American Jewish pro-settler group sent $35,000 to Im Tirzu.  None of this was reported by Didi.  So the term “scoop” used by Calcalist, and which so annoys Rettig Gur, is a precise and correct term.

My trusty correspondent also takes humbrage that I’ve implicated his boss, Natan Sharansky, in the matter by mentioning him in my first post.  I merely noted that Hagee would surely feel right at home trusting his money to be channeled through an agency directed by the Israeli neocon, Sharansky.

Rettig Gur closed his last message (undoubtedly there will be more as he seems to have an inveterate need to explain and defend himself and his employer) with a strange set of near-non sequiturs intended to buff his Israeli liberal street cred:

I’ll accept your apology for sullying my good name, and happily respond to any further concerns. Funny, I have some good friends in places like B’tselem, Van Leer and ACRI. My father was a parliamentary aide to Yossi Sarid as far back as the 1970s and was a board member of RHR for a while. In all my life, no one from that world has ever been as rude and crude to me as you, and you’ve never even met me.

Why does someone like this feel he is owed any special treatment?  Why should I treat him with kid gloves when he aids and abets the likes of John Hagee and Im Tirzu?  So I replied:

You can accept my apology if you wish to be a fantasist. But you won’t be getting an actual apology from me any time soon. There is always time to repent from your embrace of scum like Im Tirzu. But I doubt you’ll ever do so. When you do, then let me know and I’ll concede teshuva is a concept that works in your case. Till then, you’ll have my consistent criticism of you and JA.

Oh, and isn’t that nice ‘some of your best friends are Negroes.’ How sweet and condescending. You’re really a good guy aren’t you? Liberal & all.

Your father was an aide to Yossi Sarid 40 years ago & you want a pass because of that? What have you done lately? Not your father, you.

Enhanced by Zemanta
Performance Optimization WordPress Plugins by W3 EDGE