Muslim and Jewish Women in Nazareth

'We can live in peace'...John Lennon (photo: Dafna Tal)

Mahzor

Mahzor

New York Public Library

Churches

Sarajevo Haggadah

Mah Nishtanah

Sarajevo haggadah

Antaea Darom

Israeli women's art

Action

Torah as music

Ben Heine

Action

ceramic bowl

Mohammad Said Kalash, "Offering Reconciliation" exhibit (photo: Ilan Amihai)

Action

Punch and Judy/Pinchas and Jamila

Avi Katz

Action

David Grossman

Ben Heine

Action

Eldrige Street shul

Lower East Side

Action

Dove

Ben Heine

Action

Two birds

Hoda Jamal

Action

Israeli and Palestinian boys

from documentary, Promises

Action

Cat in the Hat

Yiddish version

Action

Daylight through the Wall

Banksy: graffiti art on Separation Wall

Action

Maurice Sendak's Brundibar set

New Victory Theater (photo: Nan Melville/NYT)

Action

Daniel Barenboim, West-Eastern Divan Orchestra

Palestinian-Israeli musical ensemble (photo: Kerstin Joensson/AP)

Action

Great Day on Eldrige Street

N.Y.'s klezmer greats celebrate shul rededication (photo: Leo Sorel)

Action

Joint Appeal for Peace

(Avi Katz)

Joint Appeal for Peace

Ketubah, Ancona, Italy (1772)

(Jewish Theological Seminary library)

Ancona ketubah

Posts Tagged ‘Ileana-Ros-Lehtinen’

Lobbyists Paid $18,500 a Pop for Ros-Lehtinen Israel Junket Organized by Billionaire Katsof

Monday, December 7th, 2009

An investigative story on the continuing abuse of Congress junkets despite a reform introduced last year contains this gem:

Representative Ileana Ros-Lehtinen, a Florida Republican, on another privately sponsored trip, stayed at the historic King David Hotel in Jerusalem and attended a gala party near the Western Wall as part of a weeklong conference that lobbyists and executives paid as much as $18,500 to attend.

Doheny Global, of Manhattan, used lawmakers as a lure to attract paying attendance at a meeting in Israel.

Last year Doheny, an energy and real estate investment firm, invited private equity and energy industry executives to pay $18,500 per person to hobnob with “an elite cadre” of public and private powerbrokers, including Ms. Ros-Lehtinen, the Florida congresswoman. Doheny paid to fly her and her husband in for the weeklong gathering in Tel Aviv and Jerusalem, and she appeared in a promotional video calling Irwin G. Katsof, the company’s founder, “a matchmaker for business” who “enjoys great credibility in Congress.”

Ms. Ros-Lehtinen declined to comment on the trips.

The invitation to the 2008 event, which also featured Senator Ben Nelson, Democrat of Nebraska, came from a host committee that included registered lobbyists. Depending on how much of a role that committee had in setting up the event, the trip may have violated House rules, which prohibit lawmakers from taking multiday trips “planned, organized, requested or arranged by a lobbyist.”

Her trip was “bought” on her behalf  to the tune of $13,600 by the American-Israel Educational Foundation, the non-profit arm of Aipac created specifically for these political junkets.  All told AIEF funded 12 trips for Ros-Lehtinen totalling $80,000.

Katsof hobnobs at Global Foundation for Democracy event with former Mexican president and uber-crook, Ernesto Zedillo

Katsof hobnobs at Global Foundation for Democracy event with former Mexican president and uber-kleptocrat, Ernesto Zedillo

Doheny Global is owned by the billionaire founder of Aish HaTorah, Rabbi Irwin Katsof.  He has repeatedly organized such trips in the past.  He also has extensive real estate holdings in former republics of the Soviet Union like the Ukraine.  At the company’s website, Katsof describes it as:

…A networking and consulting firm dedicated to initiating international partnerships and creating strategic alliances. Global Capital Associates assisted Israeli and Central/Eastern European start-ups in finding US investors and strategic partners, and developed investment banking relationships by capitalizing on an elite, worldwide contact network spanning a diverse range of industries – from defense to high-tech, from the life sciences to finance.

Katsof’s bio boasts that he also founded another Aish subsidiary which serves as a pro-Israel media watchdog/advocacy outfit, Honest Reporting.  The directors of Honest Reporting and Aish are the brothers, Rabbis Ephraim and Raphael Shore.  Their other brother is a TV writer who created the hit program, House.

I’ve also written before about Katsof’s vanity non-profit project boosted by his Republican friends in Congress (including John McCain), Words Can Heal.  Interestingly, this project designed to improve the tone and quality of the nation’s public discourse seems to overlook the poison that Aish is spewing with its anti-Muslim film series.  Not to mention that Doheny Global’s purchasing of political influence through junkets like these, besides bringing fortune to Katsof and business opportunities to Israel, also promotes a pro-Israel monopoly on political discourse in Congress–of all of which Doheny’s founder would no doubt be proud.

Junket purgatory: Aipac key indicating how 'painful' itinerary stops are on its Congressional junkets

Junket purgatory: Aipac key indicating how 'painful' itinerary stops are on its Congressional junkets

Katsof appears to be a serial founder of vanity non-profits.  The Global Foundation for Democracy caters to his need to see himself as a champion of democracy in the Third World including the former Soviet Republics, where he does much of his business.

Though he brings Democrats and Republicans to Israel the overwhelming preponderance of his support goes to Republicans.  The beauty of these junkets is that he can mix politics and business.  Introduce lobbyists and corporate executives to new business opportunties, introduce them as well to Congress members with power to impact their corporate agenda, while “educating” business leaders about Israel’s “needs.”  It’s a beautiful operation as far as Katsof is concerned.  There is an old saying: doing well by doing good.  In Katsof’s case, he does well by doing well.  The “good” he does is purely in his own mind.

Katsof lives in the ultra-Orthodox enclave of Monsey, N.Y.

The NY Times article from which the above passage is quoted notes the seamy underpinnings of these trips and their funding:

Lobbyists themselves are not allowed to pay for trips, but their corporate clients can. And lobbyists are permitted to give huge sums to nonprofit groups that can sponsor travel. They can also travel to destinations and meet the lawmakers once they get there, though they cannot go on the same plane….The companies finance much of this travel indirectly, getting around the spirit of the rules by giving money to nonprofits, some of which seem to exist largely to sponsor trips. In fact, the rules may have had the unexpected effect of obscuring who is actually paying for a lawmaker’s junket.

…The universe of regular sponsors has been reduced to fewer than a dozen big foundations and associations…Many of the trips are sponsored by organizations with ideological and policy agendas, rather than commercial interests. Most of those rely, at least in part, on corporate financing to underwrite trips for lawmakers.

So there you have it.  Aipac sees itself as doing Lord’s work in bringing legislators nearer to God, er Israel.  And they’re willing to skirt the edge of propriety to do so because, well they’re doing God’s work and what’re a few rules bent in service to the Lord, anyway?

J Street Opposes, Then [Sorta] Supports Congressional Attack on Goldstone

Friday, October 30th, 2009

[UPDATE: After hearing from Jeremy Ben Ami, I have extensively rewritten this post to reflect information he provided and other research material I've discovered.]

The House of Representatives, at the behest of Aipac and the Israeli embassy, is debating HR 867 (text), which denounces the Goldstone Report and calls on the U.S. government to quash further consideration of it in the UN.  The Resolution also reaffirms Israel’s “right to defend itself” presumably in the way it did during Operation Cast Lead.  So in effect, the U.S. House is encouraging the IDF to engage in war crimes in future military actions against the Palestinians.

Tikkun is circulating an acute critique of HR 867 by Steven Zunes:

The lead-off clause cynically places “fact-finding mission” in quotes, implying that this was not in fact the purpose of the investigation of a reputable and experienced team.

This is followed by a series of clauses criticizing the original mandate of the UN Human Rights Council which called only for an investigation of Israeli war crimes.  This is completely moot, however, since commission head Justice Richard Goldstone – to his credit – refused to accept the position unless its mandate was changed to one which would investigate possible war crimes by both sides in the conflict…The House resolution does not mention this…implying that the original mandate was the basis of the report.  In reality, from the start of the actual investigation, there was not such a bias against Israel, since it dedicated over 70 pages to detail a whole series of violations of the laws of war by Hamas, including rocket attacks into civilian-populated areas of Israel, torture of Palestinian opponents, and continued holding of kidnapped Israeli soldier Gilad Shalit.   Yet H. Res. 867 makes no mention of this…thereby giving the false impression that the report unfairly only dealt with the actions of the Israeli armed forces…

The resolution claims that the report makes “sweeping and unsubstantiated determinations that the Israeli military had deliberately attacked civilians during Operation Cast Lead.”  If one bothers to…read the report, there was indeed detailed and well-substantiated evidence of deadly attacks against schools, mosques, private homes and businesses nowhere near legitimate military targets.  In particular, the report cites in detail eleven incidents in which Israeli armed forces engaged in direct attacks against civilians, including cases where people were shot “while they were trying to leave their homes to walk to a safer place, waving white flags.”

…The resolution…claim[s] that the report denies Israel’s right to self-defense.  This is patently false.  There was absolutely nothing in the report that denies Israel’s right to self-defense.  It simply insists that neither Israelis nor Palestinians have the right to attack civilians.

…The resolution even claims that the report is part of an effort “to delegitimize the democratic State of Israel and deny it the right to defend its citizens and its existence can be used to delegitimize other democracies and deny them the same right.”  In reality, there is absolutely nothing in the report that delegitimizes Israel or its right to defend its citizens, nor is there anything in the report that could conceivably delegitimize other democracies or deny other democracies their right to exist or defend their citizens.  This is demagoguery at its most extreme and appears to be a right-wing effort to silence defenders of international humanitarian law by putting Congress on record as saying that documenting a given country’s war crimes is tantamount to denying that country’s right to exist and its right to self-defense.

…Perhaps most seriously, there is the final clause of the resolution which endorses Israel’s right to attack Syria and Iran because of their alleged support of Hamas.

Peace Now has taken an unequivocal stance opposed to this atrocious bit of grandstanding:

APN has serious reservations about H. Res. 867.  We do not believe that Israel or the cause of peace is aided by a Congressional effort that, however well-intentioned, is focused solely on denouncing the Goldstone Report and its authors and dismissing its findings.

…We urge the Obama Administration to show leadership in the UN and other multilateral fora in order to ensure that the Goldstone Report becomes a basis for moving forward toward peace and reconciliation…

We believe that the correct course now is for Israel’s government to launch its own independent investigation of alleged violations of human rights and international law that may have taken place in the context of the Gaza war, including those documented in the Goldstone Report.  We strongly believe that such an investigation is in the interests of Israel.

Regardless of how one judges the Goldstone Report and its findings, the report serves as a clear reminder of both the horrors of war and the critical importance of President Barack Obama’s efforts to renew peace talks.   Whatever Members of Congress may feel about the Gaza war or the Goldstone Report, the reality is that absent progress towards peace, it is only a matter of time before another war breaks out and more lives are lost.  We believe that H. Res. 867 does not serve the cause of peace and therefore, regrettably, cannot support it.

J Street began the day with a statement which portrayed the group’s doubts though it expressed itself in a more “hawkish” manner:

J Street is unable to support House Resolution 867 regarding the Goldstone Commission report on Operation Cast Lead.

J Street would be able to support a resolution that:

  • Recognizes the history of bias against Israel at the United Nations, the flaws in the original mandate to the Goldstone Commission and the dangers in pursuing resolutions in multilateral fora with a track record of anti-Israel bias;
  • Condemns the series of one-sided resolutions adopted by the UN Human Rights Council;
  • Expresses support for the people of southern Israel who were traumatized by years of constant rocket and mortar fire as well as for the people of Gaza who are suffering greatly from the effects of both the military operation and the ongoing blockade of Gaza;
  • Correctly acknowledges that the Commission’s original mandate was adjusted by Judge Goldstone himself and accepted by the Human Rights Council to include a focus on the conduct of both sides, and that the report included the first-ever exposure by a UN body of war crimes and human rights violations by Hamas;…
  • Calls on the US government to attempt to defeat in the General Assembly any resolution which unfairly focuses only on Israel and
  • Calls on the US government to state unequivocally that it will veto in the Security Council any resolution which refers charges against Israel and Israelis to the International Criminal Court.

…J Street further urges the Obama Administration to make every effort to oppose and defeat the one-sided and biased resolution that is likely to be presented next week in the General Assembly and to work actively for the adoption of a better, balanced resolution.  We urge the United States to make clear that it will use its veto to prevent any referral of this matter to the International Criminal Court.

Jeremy Ben Ami argues that this position is essentially the same as APN’s.  But that’s not the case.  In fact, APN makes no mention of an ICC referral and wisely steers clear of the minutiae of UN action.  And there are numerous other differences.  APN wrote a nuanced statement that said just enough.  J Street decided it had to throw in the kitchen sink and as a result got lost in a political thicket.

Further, when people began calling them saying that it appeared J Street was calling for a No vote on HR 867, the group released the following “clarification:”

J Street supports passage of a resolution by the U.S. Congress calling for the United States to oppose and work actively to defeat one-sided and biased action in the United Nations when it comes to Israel and the Goldstone Report.

We are not urging members of Congress to oppose H. Res. 867.  We are urging thoughtful amendment of the Resolution before passage to bring it in line with the principles we articulate…

Though this statement does support an independent Israeli investigation of Cast Lead (which is also what Goldstone calls for) the comment saying the group doesn’t oppose a yes vote disappoints.  J Street used a sledge hammer while APN used a scalpel.  The difference shows.

HR 867 was probably written by Aipac staff, though it’s lead sponsors are right-wing Republicans Ileana Ros Lehtinen and Dan Burton, along with water-carriers Howard Berman and Gary Ackerman.

Jewish Voice for Peace is also in the thick of this fight on behalf of the credibility of the Goldstone Report.

Hardline Pro-Israel Representatives Join Lowey in Stopping U.S. Aid to Abbas

Tuesday, March 6th, 2007

Nita Lowey must’ve needed some cover when she put a hold on an $86 million appropriation approved by Congress at the behest of the Bush Administration. The funds were meant to bolster Palestinian president Mahmoud Abbas. But after Abbas threw sand in Bush and Israel’s face (the hardliners’ view, not mine) by banding together with Fatah to create a unity government, Lowey decided she had to put a stop to the $86 million lest it look like Congress approved of the Mecca shenanigans.

Lowey got some flack for what she did and must’ve been feeling a little lonely. So she got some of her other AIPAC Congressional flunkies to join her in placing the hold. Now she’s in the august company of pro-Israel ideologues like Ileana Ros Lehtinen, Tom Lantos, Gary Ackerman, and Mike Pence. It’s really shameful. They’ll swear on a stack of Bibles they didn’t coordinate anything with AIPAC. And even if this is so, they didn’t need to. As one of my journalist informants for an earlier post I wrote on Lowey’s hold wrote–Lowey knows so well what AIPAC would want her to do she doesn’t even have to ask. She does it as a favor to them because she knows they’ll approve. That’s how well the pro-Israel lobby has them housetrained.

I know the bitternness in my voice and my rhetoric might be confused for someone far more hostile to Israel than I actually am. But this type of shallow, jingoistic pandering has got to stop. It’s grandstanding in the guise of policymaking. It makes Congress look like fools (except in the eyes of AIPAC). By the way, you don’t think it’s any coincidence that Lowey is among the top five House members in donations from pro-Israel PACs, do you?

AIPAC Lobbies Congress to Bring Hamas to Its Knees While Tying Bush’s Hands

Friday, February 24th, 2006

The Jewish Telegraphic Agency (JTA) published a revealing article heralding AIPAC’s upcoming national conference. This is THE event every year when 6,000 of AIPAC’s top Jewish leaders come to DC to hobnob with the political elite, which seemingly delights in paying obeisance at AIPAC’s feet. By the way, I note that this year Dick Cheney will be the “Special Guest” at the Closing Session. JTA did everyone a favor by laying out AIPAC’s political agenda for both the meeting and the remainder of the congressional session.

AIPAC policy conference screenshotBecome a Goliath for Israel–attend the AIPAC policy conference and smite Hamas

Not content with the current Bush Administration policy labeling Hamas a terror group and refusing to meet or do business with it, AIPAC has given marching orders to its congressional minions, Ileana Ros-Lehtinen and Tom Lantos, who will file the most punitive and draconian anti-PA legislation ever seen in this country:

A central focus of this year’s policy conference will be legislation that includes the toughest conditions to date for American assistance to the Palestinian Authority, in the wake of Hamas’ landslide victory in Palestinian legislative elections last month.

“The Palestinian Anti-Terrorism Act (H.R. 4681) will ban direct aid and severely limit indirect assistance to the P.A. until the president certifies that the P.A. is not controlled by a terrorist group and until Hamas agrees to fight terrorism and recognize Israel’s right to exist,” AIPAC spokesman Josh Block said this week in a statement. “Similar legislation is currently being worked on in the Senate.”

Oh, and lest you have any doubts where AIPAC stands on Iran (America’s number 1 world threat), give a gander to who’s speaking on the subject and the title of his talk:

Iran will still play a major role at the conference. The opening plenary, featuring former nuclear inspector David Kay and John Bolton, the U.S. ambassador to the United Nations, is on “How the International Community Can Stop Iran.”

That’s right, Bully Boy Bolton, will tell his AIPAC acolytes how to humiliate and destroy the Iranian government in much the same way as the group intends to obliterate Hamas and the PA. Not much room for subtlety or nuance there, I’m afraid.

Here’s how JTA describes the provisions of the Lantos-Ros Lehtinen bill:

The Palestinian Authority would have to prove it is not employing a single member of Hamas or any other group on U.S. terrorism lists; dismantle all terrorist groups; halt all anti-Israel incitement in any sector it controls and replace it with materials promoting coexistence; and ensure democracy and financial transparency.

Those certifications go beyond the reporting requirements in place under current U.S. legislation. For instance, the Palestinian Authority would have to prove that it is a transparent democracy before the first dollar arrived, instead of merely showing progress. P.A. officials would have to show that incitement had been crushed and replaced by coexistence, instead of simply pulling occasional inciting school texts and broadcasts.

The provisions are also much tougher because they extend to indirect assistance, cutting off non-governmental organizations. The only exception is for humanitarian assistance. It also reduces U.S. payments to the United Nations commensurate with the percentage of the U.N. budget that goes to the Palestinian Authority.

The legislation also tightens President Bush’s options for circumvention. It omits any national security waivers related to aid, and requires a 15-day waiting period before humanitarian aid goes forward.

Don’t you just love those restrictions: the PA has to replace anti-Israel incitement with “materials promoting coexistence.” I wonder whether Israel will face the same rules regarding its approach to the PA. Will its government have to replace anti-Hamas incitement with “materials promoting coexistence” with the PA? This is rich–that’s all I’ve got to say. Not to mention the height of hypocrisy.

Also, the PA would have to “prove that it is a transparent democracy.” What precisely does that mean and who’s the judge? Why don’t they just appoint AIPAC’s president to the job? Besides, I thought the recent Palestinian elections indicated pretty clearly that Palestine was a “transparent democracy.” I haven’t heard any Israeli pols complain about the nature of the election.

Finally, neither AIPAC nor its congressional stooges apparently trust the president or Condi Rice to run U.S. policy toward the PA as they’re tying his hands with rope by eliminating previous provisions for presidential national security waivers which allow some U.S. leeway in dealing with the PA.

Basically, AIPAC wants the PA and Hamas dead. It goes along nicely with former Sharon–and now Olmert–aide, Dov Weisglass, who advises Israel to treat Hamas and the Palestinians as a dietitian would treat a patient needing to go on a diet but without starving him to death. In fact, I’d say AIPAC would like to do away with the diet and proceed right to the starvation.

Thank God there are a few members of Congress not wrapped around AIPAC’s thumb. Henry Hyde is one:

Hyde suggested he would use his powers as committee chairman to slow down the…bill.

“Tying the hands of this administration is not in the interests of national security,” he said. “Hurting the Palestinian people will reward terrorist regimes like Syria and Iran, which seek to exploit the suffering of the Palestinians for their own selfish reasons.”

In any case, Hyde said, Ros-Lehtinen’s bill would not be considered “in advance of the formation of the new Palestinian Cabinet, which is likely to occur in the coming weeks.”

And there is also at least one congressional aide who understands the negative implications of this bill:

“The administration has a whole range of problems with the Ros-Lehtinen bill, ranging from all stick, no carrot to it being a blanket lifetime ban of aid even if reforms are enacted,” said one senior congressional staffer who asked to speak anonymously because the legislation has yet to come to the floor.

And just in case we don’t “get” the broader implications of such punitive actions against the PA and Hamas, the Christian Science Monitor publishes Arab nations say they will offset funds withheld by Israel.

Of course it would be foolish to believe that AIPAC really believes that Hamas can ever moderate its positions enough to become a trustworthy partner for Israel. But there still may be a few Americans who didn’t get the memo yet who believe that this outcome is a distinct possibility (though certainly not a guaranteed outcome). But the anti-Palestinian bill proposed would virtually guarantee that Hamas will never change. How could it? It believes in self-preservation. And if AIPAC wishes to kill Hamas does it not have a right to turn elsewhere in the world, even the Arab world, to find sustenance? The CSM article notes which governments and groups plan to step forward with aid: Iran, Malaysia, the Muslim Brotherhood, the Arab League, the Organization of the Islamic Conference. The list reads like a who’s who of nations from which we’d like to wean Hamas. No chance of that happening with AIPAC in the driver’s seat of U.S. Mideast policy.

In fact, AIPAC would be delighted at the news of who’s stepping in to take the place of Israel’s withheld tax funds, since it doesn’t want Hamas to moderate. With one-third of Palestinian budget revenue locked in Israeli government hands, Iran and that bunch would have to start looking pretty good. And the proposed bill would virtually guarantee such an outcome. Self-fulfilling prophecy, anyone?

I’m delighted to report that the Swedish government equivalent of the U.S. Agency for International Development (AID) is guaranteeing the PA $4.6-million:

“According to the fourth Geneva convention, the occupying power has a particular responsibility to support and ensure the human dignity of the occupied,” [Peter Lundberg of the group's humanitarian unit] said.

“Since Israel is not living up to its responsibility under international law, large parts of the Palestinian population are now completely dependent on international humanitarian aid,” Lundberg added.

I hope that some nations of the EU will also step forward and follow Sweden’s lead here. Neither AIPAC nor Israel should have the ability to seal a death sentence for Hamas or the PA. There is room for an independent policy toward the Palestinians. I only hope that Javier Solana, Kofi Annan and others can play such a role.