Mahzor

New York Public Library

Churches

Sarajevo Haggadah

Mah Nishtanah

Sarajevo haggadah

Antaea Darom

Israeli women's art

Action

Torah as music

Ben Heine

Action

ceramic bowl

Mohammad Said Kalash, "Offering Reconciliation" exhibit (photo: Ilan Amihai)

Action

Punch and Judy/Pinchas and Jamila

Avi Katz

Action

David Grossman

Ben Heine

Action

Eldrige Street shul

Lower East Side

Action

Dove

Ben Heine

Action

Two birds

Hoda Jamal

Action

Israeli and Palestinian boys

from documentary, Promises

Action

Cat in the Hat

Yiddish version

Action

Daylight through the Wall

Banksy: graffiti art on Separation Wall

Action

Maurice Sendak's Brundibar set

New Victory Theater (photo: Nan Melville/NYT)

Action

Daniel Barenboim, West-Eastern Divan Orchestra

Palestinian-Israeli musical ensemble (photo: Kerstin Joensson/AP)

Action

Great Day on Eldrige Street

N.Y.'s klezmer greats celebrate shul rededication (photo: Leo Sorel)

Action

Joint Appeal for Peace

(Avi Katz)

Joint Appeal for Peace

Ketubah, Ancona, Italy (1772)

(Jewish Theological Seminary library)

Ancona ketubah

Posts Tagged ‘holocaust’

The ‘Other’ Righteous Gentiles: Muslims

Wednesday, January 4th, 2012


I’ve been rolling around in the mud too much in the past week or so after exposing David Lange and Yeshayahu Rotter. It’s time to hear of heroes and human decency for a change. I hope you appreciate these courageous acts as much as I did in reading about them and writing this post.

Anyone who knows anything about the Holocaust knows about the Righteous Gentiles, those heroic non-Jews recognized by Israel’s Yad Vashem museum for saving the lives of Jews at great peril to themselves. In almost every instance, these gentiles are Christian. It is a lesser known fact that a number of Muslims also saved Jews during World War II. In a number of cases, Israel has been unwilling to recognize their heroism by bestowing the designation on them.

The first case is that of an individual known as the “Muslim Schindler,” an Iranian diplomat who risked everything in wartime Paris to save Jews who sought his assistance:

Abdol-Hossein Sardari, a junior Iranian diplomat, found himself almost by accident in charge of Iran’s mission in Paris in 1940 and went on to help up to 2,000 Iranian Jews flee France, according to In the Lion’s Shadow.

But he only recently received posthumous recognition for his deeds.

…But by cultivating his contacts with German and Vichy officials, Mr Sardari somehow managed to win exemptions from Nazi race laws for at least 2,000 Iranian Jews by arguing that they did not have blood ties to European Jewry.

He claimed that despite the fact that some Iranians had followed the teachings of the Prophet Moses for thousands of years, they had always been of Iranian stock and therefore were “Mousaique” – Moses followers, which he dubbed “Djuguten” – and not part of the Jewish race.

…His task became even more dangerous when Britain and Russia invaded Iran in September 1941, when he was ordered by Tehran to return home as soon as possible after it signed a treaty with the Allies. But he stayed on regardless, using instead inheritance money to keep his office going after being stripped of his diplomatic immunity and pay.

A perfect example of an ingenious, resourceful individual exploiting the machinery and thinking of the Nazi bureaucracy in order to retain a sense of humanity. For his troubles, Sardari died a lonely, unheralded figure in exile:

[He] neither sought nor received much recognition for his efforts in his lifetime and died lonely in a bedsit in Croydon, south London, in 1981.

He had lost his ambassador’s pension and Tehran properties in the Iranian revolution.

In one of the rare instances in which you will find me speaking positively of the Simon Wiesenthal Center, they recognized Sardari’s achievements in a 2004 ceremony. Though I suspect the reason may’ve been remunerative in that Los Angeles Iranian Jewish community is immensely wealthy and such a award would tend to open the spigot for their donations to the Center. No matter, even doing a good deed for a bad reason is good.

In the second case, another Jewish Holocaust survivor from Arab lands wrote of her championing of her Muslim savior. When I first read the author’s last name, Weisel, I figured she would be a relative of Elie Wiesel, writing of her own survival of the Holocaust. How wrong I was.

In her op-ed she masterfully presents her story as if she was a typical (if there can be such a thing) survivor saved in WWII Europe by a Righteous Christian Gentile:

IN December 1942, when I was 13 years old, German troops occupied my hometown. Within days, our house was commandeered as an officers’ mess hall. I soon had a yellow star on my dress, setting me apart from many of my childhood friends. The men of our family were ordered into forced labor. My happy life had vanished.

Luckily, an influential local man knew of our difficult straits and generously offered his protection. One night, he ferried the women, children and old men in our family to a farm he owned about 20 miles outside of town. There, he said, we would be safe. Though the stables he provided us for lodging were modest, with just a drape across the door to protect against the elements, we were relieved to be behind the thick, high walls of his property. We were deeply grateful.

Yet here she ‘lowers the boom,’ exposing the true identity of her savior:

During the horrors of the Holocaust, non-Jews saved many thousands of Jews from death and depravity at the hands of Germans and their allies. Yad Vashem, Israel’s official Holocaust memorial museum, has recognized more than 23,000 of these brave men and women as “The Righteous Among the Nations.” Our family’s rescuer deserves to be among that number. And in his case, the impact of recognition would have powerful reverberations, striking a blow against Holocaust denial in a part of the world where such denial is widespread.

That is because my hometown is Mahdia, on the eastern shore of Tunisia, and our rescuer, Khaled Abdul Wahab, was an Arab Muslim. (He passed away in 1997.)

Yet his noble act of heroism has yet to be recognized by the State of Israel. In fact, efforts by her to do so have been summarily rejected. So despite the enormous suffering inflicted on the Jews during the Holocaust and the few non-Jews who assuaged that suffering by saving their lives, Israel perpetuates some of that injustice by denying Khaled Abdul Wahab his due as a Righteous Gentile:

So far, however, Abdul Wahab has been denied the recognition he deserves. Nearly five years ago, in January 2007, the Department of the Righteous at Yad Vashem nominated him to be a “righteous,” the first Arab ever to be formally considered for this honor. This nomination was based on witness testimony from my late sister, Anny Boukris. In March of that year, however, the official Commission for the Designation of the Righteous, a body presided over by a retired Israeli judge and created by Israeli law to decide who merits recognition as a “righteous,” voted to reject the nomination. That decision was kept secret for two years.

It gets worse, one of the key Israeli figures who denied Wahab the status he is due was the same man who chaired the Israeli commission which exonerated the IDF of any misdeeds resulting from the Mavi Marmara massacre. Retired Supreme Court Judge Jacob Turkel continued his record of prejudicing the deeds of Muslims by refusing to honor Wahab:

In 2010, that same jurist, Justice Jacob Tuerkel, sent the Abdul Wahab file back to the commission for a second review. This time, the case was bolstered by two fresh testimonies — a video interview of my cousin Edmee Masliah, who was with me at the farm and now lives outside Paris, and a notarized letter I wrote recounting my own experience. Yad Vashem now had three firsthand accounts of the story. But to my complete dismay, the Commission for the Designation of the Righteous once again voted to reject the nomination. Abdul Wahab was a noble man, I was told by Yad Vashem, but his actions did not rise to the statutory level required to merit the “righteous” designation — that is, he didn’t “risk his life” to save Jewish lives.

This is patent nonsense. Anyone with any knowledge of the Holocaust period knows that anyone caught harboring Jewish fugitives could be killed, even summarily executed. To claim that Wahad didn’t endanger his own life is unspeakable.

Eva Weisel, the survivor, is entirely too generous and kind to Israel for this behavior. But I will allow her to display her graciousness in hope it may shame Israelis into pressuring this committee to reverse the injustice it has committed:

I refuse to believe that Yad Vashem has one standard for “righteous” in Europe and another for “righteous” who performed their sacred duty on the other side of the Mediterranean, in an Arab country.

Sixty-nine years after pinning a yellow star to my chest in my native land, I know that I was able to enjoy a long, full life because Abdul Wahab confronted evil and saved me, as he saved other fortunate members of my family. I hope that Yad Vashem reconsiders his case before no one is left to tell his story.

One of the hardest things for me to accept concerning the Holocaust in contemporary times is the blithe disregard some of us non-survivors have for those who endured this unspeakable horror. We stand in judgment of them. Take the abomination that is the attack on George Soros, who was a Hungarian teenager when he was taken in by a non-Jewish family friend. To hear Glenn Beck tell it, Soros practically betrayed the Jews in their hiding places. Who the hell is Glenn Beck to sit in judgment? What does he know about what Soros and those other Jews went through? How does he know how he would’ve reacted under the same circumstances? Would he have behaved better, worse?

By the same token, how can someone comfortably ensconced in the 21st century determine that a Tunisian who saved a large Jewish family from liquidation, did so at no direct danger to himself? How would someone not privy to the period know that Wahab behaved in a way that was little better than any average human being would have? It’s damn offensive, I say, both to history, the victims and their protectors.

Justice for Khaled Abdul Wahab! Let us not allow the current climate of Islamophobia that reigns in Israel to invade the sacred precincts of recognizing Holocaust heroes.

I’m also reminded of the true story behind the novel, People of the Book, which recounts the brave acts of heroism by Croatian Muslims who took the Sarajevo Haggadah from the local Jewish community for safekeeping during the Holocaust. As one of the most valuable and unique historic Jewish illuminated manuscripts, it was highly sought after by the Nazis for their museum of the Jewish people which they planned after they’d liquidated every one of us. Local Muslims frustrated these aims and preserved the book so it could be repatriated to the Jewish community after the War.

During the Sarajevo siege, the book was again endangered as it would housed in the national library building which was savagely shelled by Serbian forces. Once again, the brave citizens of the city spirited the book to a secret hiding place until it was safe for it to resurface. James Wolfensohn generously subsidized a new facsimile reprinting of the Haggadah which is for sale (click on link).

In the Ted Koppel era, Nightline aired an amazing documentary by Edward Serotta about the saving of the Sarajevo haggadah. I recommend it very highly and you can buy it through the Amazon ad here.

The moral of this tale is that there are Israeli Jewish nationalists who seek to deny the goodness and decency of Muslims. They do this for purely political reasons. And when they do so they not only perpetuate the sins of the Holocaust, they deny Jewish humanity and give in to the fear and ignorance of racism. Let us not give in. Let us give all Righteous Gentiles their due, including Muslims.

Rabbi Rotter’s Persecution Complex and Pedophilia Obsession

Monday, January 2nd, 2012

A few days ago, following on the heels of Moni Dvir’s blog post about “Rabbi” (more on the scare quotes later) Yeshayahu Rotter, I published further details about the personal and political history of the founder of the major radical-right Israeli internet portal, Rotter.net.  Among other things, I found no evidence to bolster his claim to a PhD from Boston University, nor could I find any evidence of his being an IDF combat officer (he is a reserve officer–rank of captain, a rank earned at the late age of 33–but only by virtue of being a military chaplain) as a Maariv interview with him claimed.  I also noted several sources, including one formerly close to his family, alleging he had been charged by Israeli police with embezzling from a Jerusalem bank where he worked in the 1980s.

New evidence has emerged about other suspect claims Rotter has made about himself and his past.  In the 2007 Maariv interview I wrote about in my earlier post, Rotter claimed he had a BA and MBA in business studies from Yozmot College.  A call to Yozmot produced the information that they do not award such degrees and do not even have a business program.  In the same interview, Rotter claims he earned smicha from the famous U.S. Orthodox Rabbi Moshe Feinstein.  However, an Israeli Wikipedia commenter doubts even this story (all links in Hebrew), noting that he likely would’ve had to spend a number of years studying in the U.S. with Feinstein.  Given that Rotter himself admits his English is poor, it seems unlikely.  Not to mention that Haredi rabbinical students don’t generally study with a teacher from the modern Orthodox movement, of which Feinstein was one of the leading lights.  I haven’t ever seen any evidence that he’s spent any time in the U.S. other than these claims.  The whole thing doesn’t add up.

So is it possible that Rotter earned smicha?  Sure.  Just likely not with Feinstein.  But that’s the story he’s put out there in public.  Again, a nutcase like Rotter likely believes I have a personal vendetta against him.  I don’t.  I just believe people should be transparent about themselves and their beliefs.  They should be who they really are and not who they claim they are.  Or at least there shouldn’t be any difference between the two.

Ever since my first post about him, his site has been quaking with fulminations against me and shows of fealty for the good rabbi.   He’s even put out an APB for any dirt his hasidim can dig up:

If anyone among our readers has any serious, pertinent information especially about [Silverstein's] legal or financial complications along with supporting documentation pass it along to me…

In a rank act of hypocrisy which you’ll discover below, Rotter warns readers not to supply rumors.  He also admits that his English isn’t very good, which begs the question: how can he make the accusations he does about me below if he can’t read my blog or understand what I’ve written or much of what’s been written about me, true or false?

The funny thing is that my life is pretty much an open book.  I’ve been much more candid here than most bloggers.  The only reason I’ve stopped being so in past years, is because of miscreant monsters like Rotter who attempt to twist and turn truth and facts into distorted lies.

Now, Rotter has substantially upped the ante.  He wrote to me threatening to publish an exposé of my personal background that would accuse me of being questioned by the police for pedophilia.  Among other charges he stated that I’d had “financial difficulties” and that my “spiritual health” was compromised.  He claimed in an email to me that there was a warrant for my arrest in Israel (undoubtedly another lie).  In a Rotter.net posting linked below, a member specifies the warrant accuses me of “giving aid to the enemy.”  While I’m not versed in Israeli law, even if any of this garbage were true, which it isn’t, it would seem difficult for Israel to prosecute a U.S. citizen (and a non-Israeli citizen) for aiding an enemy of Israel.  He also, and most mysteriously of all, threatened to expose details about my grandfather!

In another message to me, he actually conceded that he didn’t know whether these charges were true but that he’d read them on Google and what he could say for certain was that they were published there.  This comment alone is so astonishing it’s hard to believe the man has spent any time on the internet, let alone runs a major Israeli web portal.  It seems to me that if he had a PhD in Jewish philosophy as he claims, he might’ve taken a course on epistemology, which would’ve taught him the difference between truth and lies and how to prove that something is true.  Needless to say, none of these charges are true.

About a year ago, a Rotter member published at the site a fake FBI press release stating I’d been arrested for pedophilia by the Seattle FBI office and Broward County police (the jerk had no idea Seattle and Broward Country are about as far as they can be from each other and still be in the U.S.).  After I demanded that Rotter take the post down, he wrote to me that he had done so and banned the member who posted it.  Clearly, Rotter knew at the time that this accusation was false.  Therefore, publishing it again is an even more egregious abuse.

Apparently, Rotter needed to bring out the big guns and so he reinstated this monster, who’s reared his ugly head again publishing the same nonsense.  Which is interesting, because Rotter took down the claim when originally published.  Yet now the same lying claim has resurfaced.  In the field of libel law, Rotter’s walking on very, very thin ice.  The same Rotter member claims I’ve kited checks (but admits “there were some things” regarding this he “didn’t understand”–an understatement) and that my mother filed a criminal complaint against me, after which pictures of naked children were found on my computer.  The problem is that Rabbi Rotter and some of his followers don’t understand the difference between reality as they wish it was and as it really is.  For them, who they would like me to be is the same as what I really am.  This seems awfully close to mental pathology to me.

Rabbi Rotter also claims in an email to me that everything he’s doing is under a lawyer’s supervision.  Which either means he’s lying (a distinct possibility) or that both he and his lawyer are fools.

The distinguished Israeli attorney, Michael Sfard, wrote to Rotter on my behalf warning him about Israel libel law.  But that hasn’t stopped other Rotter members, acting either directly on behalf of their champion or indirectly, from publishing the pedophilia charges.  I too have written to him warning him that I would pursue every legal recourse at my disposal and in any relevant jurisdiction to fight back against his calumny.  I am exploring those avenues now.

Other interesting aspects of this man’s psyche include an accusation he made against the Israeli blogger, Moni Dvir, I mentioned above who first posted about him.  Rotter shreyed that Moni was “persecuting” him in a way that could lead to his “murder” (under a halachic concept called redifat retzach).  In a separate Rotter.net post, he commented upon the protests by secular Israelis against Haredi spitting attacks against an 8-year-old Beit Shemesh girl (also Orthodox, but a more moderate brand), by claiming that Israelis intended to treat the Haredim as they treated Jews in Germany during the Holocaust.  He noted that when he walks down the street he does so paying close attention to his surroundings lest danger lurk somewhere.  He likened this to the feelings of Jews in 1930s Germany.  He further argued that Israelis would, after the Haredi were massacred (he doesn’t say how, but presumably they’d be gassed in extermination camps), attempt to claim that they hadn’t participated in this incitement to murder, that they’d opposed it.  But, and you can hear imaginary strains of ominous music rising on the soundtrack, by then it would be TOO LATE.  Imagine the deep, paranoid persecution complex that could cause a man to believe such things.  Note also, the need for the Haredim to turn a legitimate protest against THEIR offensive behavior into self-victimization.  It is THEY who are victims, they who the nation hates and persecutes. It’s moral extortion and blackmail, and revolting.

Finally, I’ve noted here a number of times the fascination, even obsession, that the radical Jewish right has for sexual degradation.  Some of the defamatory claims against the left that arise again and again concern pedophilia, incest, homosexuality, interracial sex, etc.  It is one of the chief ways in which they destroy the reputation of those they detest on the left.  Exploiting so-called sexual deviancy attitudes takes a political disagreement and turns it into a crusade against moral degeneracy.  Those are much more favorable terms for debate than sticking to substantive political argument.  There is a deep pathology here that someone’s probably written a doctoral dissertation about (or should).  Not Rabbi Rotter’s dissertation of course, since we don’t seem able to locate that.

UPDATE: I also note that Rabbi Rotter told me that my reply to his charges would be included in any “expose” they publish about me.  So I decided to test him on that by posting a link to this post (clicking on the link will generate a 404 page not found error) at Rotter.net noting that it was my reply to his charges.  Guess how long the link lasted before being taken down?  Maybe 10 minutes.  So much for the Rabbi’s willingless to stand by his word and offer someone a chance to reply.

Haredi Jews Dress Children as Holocaust Camp Inmates in Jerusalem Protest

Sunday, January 1st, 2012
haredi children in holocaust camp inmate uniforms

Haredi children in Holocaust camp inmate uniforms (Olivier Pitoussi)

Now I know the Israel’s Haredi community has truly lost its mind.  In Beit Shemesh, they began by spitting on an Orthodox 8-year-old Israeli-American girl making her way to school, because she was dressed “immodestly.”  When the rest of Israel rose in arms at the outrage of this act, the Haredim responded by protesting, trashing parts of the town and lighting fires.  Their idea is that it’s no one else’s friggin’ business what they do in their communities, so butt out bud.

Tonight, they protested in Jerusalem and as part of the festivities they dressed their children in stripped, Holocaust camp inmate uniforms replete with Jewish stars.  The point being…what…what point can there be in this?  That the rest of Israel is murdering them simply because they’re Jews?

The cheap blackmail of this trickery is astonishing.  And despite what anyone may tell you in Israel, it works.  No one crosses these people.  They own the place.  The authorities and politicians cater to their every whim.  In the Territories, the Haredi settlements and yeshivot produce some of the most virulent, violent perpetrators of murder and violence.  These people generally don’t even recognize the secular state as their own.  They vastly prefer the creation of a “Torah-true” theocratic state.  And they’re not above violent rebellion against the authority of the current state.  That’s what price tag violence is all about.

If I’m not mistaken, the Taliban Jews in Israel, who force their women to dress in head to toe chador-like clothing are Haredi.  These are sects which like women only as baby-producing machines.  If you’re not one of their women, you might as well be dirt under their feet.  It’s the Haredi who insist that their public transportation be gender segregated.  They’ll spit on you or scream at you when you dare not to move to the back of the bus.

The next time you hear an Islamophobe or hasbarist railing about the oppression of women in Islamist societies, remind them that Israel has its own Taliban.  And don’t be fooled by anyone who says they are an extreme minority.  This community is by far the fastest growing in all Israel.  Birth-rates are through the roof.  It’s also by far the poorest, least well-educated, and most isolated from the outside world.  This, I’m sorry to say, stands to be the future of Israel if things don’t change in the coming years.

To give you an idea of their politics, Rabbi Yeshayahu Rotter, who I profiled here, is a proud Haredi Jew.

I should add that not every Haredi Jew can be characterized as I have those above.  No doubt, there are some who are principled, law-abiding, and tolerant.  But they are certainly overwhelmed by the nutcases who parade their children in such shameful, despicable costumes extorting Israeli acceptance of their aberrant behavior.

Have they no shame?  At long last, have they no shame?  To defile the memory of the Holocaust in this way.  It makes one want to wretch.

Armenian Genocide as Political Payback Against Turkey

Sunday, December 25th, 2011

One of the sacred lessons of the Holocaust in contemporary Jewish life has always been that it is such a transcendent historical event that it must not be exploited for political gain by anyone, Jew or gentile. This, in essence is one of the sine qua nons of the ADL, which makes a point of taking to task demagogues of the world who engage in such cheap behavior. My problem with that organization is that such denunciations seem reserved far more often for the political left than the political right. But that’s a subject for another time.

The Israeli Knesset is poised to exploit a different Holocaust in precisely the same way it would take to task any other country engaging in such cheap theatrics. For years, as long as it enjoyed a healthy relationship with Turkey, Israel has refused to acknowledge the Armenian genocide. This is nothing short of Holocaust denial (though of a slightly different vintage, since it isn’t JEWISH Holocaust denial). The ADL too, in accord with Israel’s approach, refused to recognize this historic tragedy. This, despite the fact that the national group features Holocaust education as one of its core missions.

Now that relations with Turkey have soured, Israel can now afford to develop historical memory and a moral conscience. The Knesset is now considering appointing a day in the nation’s calendar that will recognize this other Middle Eastern Holocaust.

Of course there was an Armenian genocide and of course it should be recognized by all nations, including and especially Turkey. But the Knesset’s actions beg the question: why now? The answer is of course because now it’s politically expedient to acknowledge Armenian suffering as long as it discomfits our new enemy of the moment: Turkey.

This is yet another shameful abuse of the Holocaust (this one Armenian) for a nation’s selfish political interests. It is simply unacceptable for Israel or anyone to exploit such unimaginable suffering for partisan advantage. There must be a line drawn somewhere, a sacred prohibition against such cheap and tawdry grandstanding. And as a nation claiming to represent the history and suffering of the entire Jewish people, it is an unpardonable sin for Israel to turn the Armenian genocide into a cudgel to use in it’s mini-war against Turkey.

For if Israel does this, it will simply have no leg to stand on when it wishes to complain about others exploiting OUR Holocaust for their own ends.

The Knesset’s protestations that the new deliberations aren’t politically motivated and have nothing to do with petty vengeance against Turkey for siding with the Palestinians during and after Operation Cast Lead, ring hollow. Just like the defense ministry’s cancellation of a contract with Turkey to deploy an advanced Israeli-made radar system, for fear it might end up in Iran’s hands, rang hollow when it claimed the announcement had nothing to do with the current political spat between the two countries. Of course it has everything to do with politics and little or nothing to do with the security concerns advanced by Israel.

Glenn Beck at ZOA Dinner: ’18 Months to Save World, I Know How to Do It’

Tuesday, November 22nd, 2011
zoa 2011 dinner honorees

ZOA 2011 dinner honorees

Mort Klein and ZOA provide endless enjoyment for anyone with an acute political satiric sense.  Take their latest fundraising gala last night covered by Haaretz.  There was so much to delight in, I hardly know where to start.  Why don’t we begin with the Bar Ilan University professor, who boasted that his Orthodox institution was the only remaining university in Israel that was “Zionist.”  Wouldn’t that be something like Alan Dershowitz bragging that Harvard was the only remaining Christian university left in America?  But that wasn’t the worst.  The good professor complained about his academic colleagues at Tel Aviv and Hebrew Universities:

“There are many Bolshevik post-Zionists at these universities, who pack their faculties with similar-minded lecturers. The Israeli universities are overflowing with post-Modernists who undermine not only Zionism but academic truth itself.”

Did you notice the equation between Zionism and “academic truth” the good professor makes?  Last I checked, the finest universities had no specific ideological or political orientation.  In fact, most truly good academics will tell you that an institution which holds to one is betraying the values of free inquiry that are critical to academia.  This guy is no junior lecturer either.  He’s Ephraim Inbar, the director of the Begin-Sadat Center.  Can you imagine how this hack got Anwar Sadat’s name associated with his think tank?  The poor Egyptian leader must be turning over in his grave.

But why stop there?  There were so many other wonders to behold at this wingnut fest.  How ’bout Republican settler advocate Rep. Ileana Ros-Lehtinen, who denounced the concept of Palestinian statehood (“A Palestinian state? What is that, anyway?”) in receiving the “coveted” “Dr. Irving & Cherna Moskowitz Award for Promoting Strong US-Settler [er, Israel] Relations.”

Michele Bachmann was on hand to receive the “Dr. Miriam & Sheldon Adelson Defender of Israel Award.”  This is what constitutes “defending Israel” in the twisted minds of the ZOA and the 800 ardent wingnut supporters who flocked to this event:

 [She] pledged to move the American Embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem “on the day that I am sworn into office” and…assert[ed] that “Israel will never be up for grabs – not one inch, not one acre, not one square foot will ever be on the chopping block.”

…Asserting that Iranian President Ahmadinejad was “striving for a second Holocaust” Bachman said that “once again millions of Jews are at the precipice of losing their lives today”. She called for the US Navy to impose a complete naval blockade on Iran, for the US to deploy comprehensive ballistic missile systems “on land, sea, air and in space” and for the Pentagon to prepare “war plans” in order to counter Iran’s nuclear threat.

Ahmadinejad, she said, “will seek to use nuclear weapons against the US as well – and the US will learn what it is to be Israel if it does not act quickly.” She said that the US Secretary of Defense, Secretary of State and CIA director must all support this “freedom policy” and that those in the bureaucracy who fail to do so – “especially in the State Department” – should be replaced.

I really liked that touch of deploying nuclear missiles against Iran even in space.  I didn’t even know we maintain nuclear warheads in outer space.  Just think, it’s not bad enough we’re going to destroy earth’s atmosphere by dropping the Big One on the Aye-ranians, Bachmann wants to send radiation into outer space as well for the next millennium or so.  I found it especially ironic that this nuclear attack on Iran enjoyed the moniker “freedom policy.”  I suppose if you want to “liberate” half the inhabitants of earth of their lives and to pollute their environment for centuries you could call it that.

Then of course, there was the piece de la resistance, Glenn Beck. who fulminated that the situation in today’s world was far worse than in Hitler’s day:

…Because today the world is “aiding and abetting” the ranting of madmen who are out to destroy Israel and the Jewish people.

Somehow he forget Hitler’s appeaser, Neville Chamberlain.  Speaking of which, you knew you couldn’t escape a Beckian rhetorical assault without a brutish “historical” analogy between the left and Nazis.  So he equated the Brownshirts and Occupy Wall Street.  Not to mention OWS facilitates rape because it doesn’t denounce the sexual violence that allegedly takes place at their meeting sites.

Do you think there’ll be an ADL alert taking these a-historical numbskulls to task for abusing the Holocaust for partisan political purposes?  Unlikely.

The best line of the night, by far, was this one:

…”There is an 18 month window” left in which to save the world – “and I believe I know how to do it”. He pledged to announce on December 8 where he is headed – “there is a vacuum and I intend to stand in its place”, he said – but gave no details what he was referring to.

Almost brings to mind Jesus doesn’t it?  Though the analogy might not have gone over so well if it’d been raised last night.  What’s he going to run for?  God?  Please tell me he’s going to run for president.  Please God.  That’s all the Republicans need.  If I thought Obama deserved a second term, I’d be doing a happy dance if Beck threw his Stetson (oh excuse me, that’s Rick Perry territory) in the ring.

Returning to Beck’s statement above, if he “stands” in that vacuum all the way through December 8th he’s liable to suffocate, either from lack of oxygen or the oppressive weight of his own megalomania.  That is assuming he’s humanoid.  If he’s made of the divine, all bets are off.

I bet you didn’t know that the Beck-man was such a chum of Nelson Mandela, did you?  How else to explain this invocation of the great African liberator?

“To claim that there is apartheid [in Israel] when there is none is to diminish Nelson Mandela and all those like him.”

In honoring Glenn Beck, who’s been known to let loose some anti-Semitic ejaculations on his show, ZOA repeated its tradition of honoring such haters.  In 2005, it similarly honored Pat Robertson.

The fact that ZOA has named awards after two of the richest, most racist and chauvinistic American Jews means they’re getting oodles of cash from Moskowitz and Adelson.  I’ll give my own Tikun Olam award to anyone who comes up with the goods on these fat cats supporters of Greater Judea.  I’d love to be able tell you how much they’ve given to the Mort Klein Settlermania Roadshow.

Settler MKs Welcome Russian Neo-Nazi Holocaust Deniers to Knesset, Yad VaShem

Thursday, July 28th, 2011

When an Israeli reader sent this story to me I couldn’t believe the headline summarized above.  Further, in this day and age of Norwegian neo-Nazi, anti-jihadi attacks which wrap themselves in the Israeli flag, this story is simply mind-blowing.

russian neo nazis welcomed by israeli settlers

Russian neo-Nazis parade displaying Hitler salute before their settler-organized visit to Knesset and Yad VaShem.

It begins with a visit from a Russian neo-Nazi delegation to Israel.  Under the auspices of Tuvia Lerner, editor of the Russian edition of Arutz 7, the media voice of the settler movement, they inveigled themselves an invitation to meet with far-right MKs Aryeh Eldad and Ayoob Kara.  They also toured Yad VaShem without telling anyone there that they were Holocaust deniers.  Like I told you, this story has to be read to be believed.  The two Russians have been photographed giving Nazi salutes, celebrating Der Fuhrer’s birthday, and they published songs of praise to Adoph Hitler on their website.

Naturally, when they met with the MKs the ideas they espoused were quite different.  One of the neo-Nazis told Israeli TV that the concept of Israel “excites me,” because it involves “an ancient people who took upon itself a pioneer project to revive a modern state and nation.”  The TV reporter tartly asked how the neo-Nazi of yesterday suddenly became a Zionist.  How they did it, is by finding a common enemy: Islam (sound familiar?).  The second neo-Nazi tells the interviewer:

“We’re talking about radical Islam which is the enemy of humanity, enemy of democracy, enemy of progress and of any sane society.

With friends like this does Israel need enemies?  Does it wish to lie down with dogs who kill Chechens and Africans for sport only to rise up with fleas?  Who assassinate human rights activists and lawyers?  Who dream of a master race following its destiny?  Is Israel so desperate that it needs such friends in order to battle the common Muslim enemy?  Have we not learned a single thing from Anders Breivik?

Lerner attempts to defend his efforts to ingratiate the Russian fascist movement into the good graces of Israeli society by claiming that the two neo-Nazis told him they regretted the anti-Semitic statements they’d made fifteen years ago.  But can the leopard changes its spots??  The reporter notes that in just the past year the group wrote that the Holocaust was “a myth.”  Then he asks whether the apology was sincere and whether such figures belonged in a place in which the elected representatives of the nation gathered.

The report also features an interview with Eldad in which he feigns an intelligence he clearly lacks, when he says that he knew from the outset that something “didn’t smell right.”  And that he met them for only a few minutes (when the TV screen fills with images of him shaking hands and laughing jovially with the Russian delegation).

Anyone reading this blog knows my views about settler extremists, but how can Israel countenance such shocking, disgraceful acts from Arutz 7 and these disgusting representatives of the Israeli people elected to the Knesset?  Is anyone using their brains there?  Or has everyone lost their senses?  Regaling neo-Nazis with anti-jihadi jokes in the halls of the Knesset?  Defiling Yad VaShem with unreconstructed Holocaust deniers?  Please someone explain this to me (if you can).

Breivik’s Neo-Nazi Manifesto, Latter-Day Mein Kampf

Sunday, July 24th, 2011
2083   a European Declaration of Independence

Title page of Breivik's manifesto

Hitler had his Jewish problem. Anders Breivik, his Muslim problem. The more I read of Breivik’s manifesto, A European Declaration of Independence, the more it appears to me a latter-day version of Hitler’s Mein Kampf.

Remember that when the dictator-to-be wrote his magnum opus he had not yet devised the formula for the Final Solution. He knew what the problem was (Jews) and had some ideas about how to deal with it, but he hadn’t come up with the policy of genocide adopted at the 1942 Wansee Conference. So Breivik sees clearly that the problem for Europe is Muslims (rather than Jews). They are the common “foreign” body infecting the pure western European gene pool. But Breivik hasn’t yet developed a genocidal policy to accompany this realization. He only states that Muslims must be removed from Europe (and the western world, including Israel), not that they must be exterminated.

But given that Breivik forecast that his right-wing revolution would not succeed till 2083, we can only wonder at what sort of Final Solution there would be for the Muslim problem in Europe by then.

While Breivik’s views in one major particular diverge from those of Hitler, in many other ways they mirror each other precisely. As for the difference, Breivik only sees SOME Jews as the problem. Those are the Marxist Jews in the Diaspora and Israel, the ones embracing multiculturalism. They are the enemy. But the Norwegian neo-Nazi views Zionist Israel, as represented by anti-jihadis like Avigdor Lieberman, as what he calls “cultural cousins.” Israel is the far-right’s friend in this view because this is a nation that hates Islam and will expel the Muslims living within it.

Interestingly, John Hagee’s views of Jews and Israel are very similar.  Hagee too believes that secular Jews and Jewish political leftists are the enemies of Christianity and the ones who will die in the End Times.  Israel, that is Zionist Israel living out the Biblical dream, will survive in his world view.  They will be the saving remnant, and of course the group that will eventually turn to accept Jesus as Christ.  Hagee’s best friends in Israel, the settlers and political leaders like Avigdor Lieberman, are precisely the ones admired most by Breivik.

Hitler too railed against Jewish Bolsheviks and saw them as the heart of all evil. Perhaps had Hitler lived to see the creation of the State of Israel he too might’ve modified his views about Jews (or conversely, had Hitler lived there might never have been a State of Israel). At any rate, Muslims play the same role Jews did for Hitler in the Breivik universe. They are the irredeemably evil.

But interestingly, while Hitler chose to attack Jews unmercifully almost from the beginning of his political career, Breivik chose not to attack Muslims physically at all. Instead, he chose to attack the heart of the ‘Marxist multicultural’ beast, Norway’s ruling party and institutions of state. To his mind, the rightist revolution would resonate most with an attack on the soft underbelly of the state, rather than on the nation’s Muslims.  For Breivik, Marxists like those of the Norwegian Labor Party and the hated European Union, are collaborators with the Muslim enemy.  The former are the ones who will enable to latter to overrun Europe.  And because these collaborators are white Christians like himself, they are race traitors.  All of which probably justifies attacking them, before going on to ‘getting the job done’ against Muslims.  Here is his underlying thinking on the subject:

Why armed resistance against the cultural Marxist/multiculturalist regimes of Western Europe is the only rational approach

Multiculturalism, like drugs, is an insidious weapon. Both destroy the heart and fabric of a people. All ties to family, community, and one’s people as a whole are destroyed by these two opiates of the human mind. Both are sponsored from the top down by one world elitists bent upon creating a world order who’s power is such that its subjects posses no potential for resistance.

…War or armed resistance has traditionally always been used as a last resort, when dialogue has proven to ineffective. The justification for use of armed resistance against the European cultural Marxist/multiculturalist systems is tied to the outlook for cultural conservative political success. You have to ask yourself; is it remotely possible under the current conditions that a conservative, monocultural political party will ever gain substantial political influence? An increasing number of Europeans are opening their eyes to the reality that the democratical struggle through dialogue has been lost. The cultural Marxists have institutionalised multiculturalism and have no intention of ever allowing us to exercise any political influence of significance. In theory we, the cultural conservatives of Europe, have become slaves under an oppressive, tyrannical, extreme left-wing system with absolutely no hope of reversing the damage they have caused. At least not democratically..

Breivik made common cause with other European far-rightist groups like the English Defense League (whose name may be a deliberate echo of the Jewish Defense League), Geert Wilders and others. One factor that they all share is pro-Israelism. For them, the enemy of my (Muslim) enemy is my friend. That’s precisely why Pam Geller, Robert Spencer, Daniel Pipes, Bat Yeor and other Jewish anti- jihadis find the European far-right so attractive. And it’s a reason why all of them are so dangerous. Not in the way that Breivik is physically dangerous. But intellectually and politically dangerous.  Scott Shane wrote an interesting story about this today in the Times.

The Norwegian mass-murderer may’ve killed regardless of whether Geller et al. existed. But his certitude in his cause and the intellectual underpinnings of it come from them. Without them, he may’ve just been a malcontent searching for a cause. With them, he had a cause to live and die–and kill others–for.

Yesterday, I identified a number of interesting quotations from the Breivik manifesto and excerpted them in a post.  I’ve continued my review and there are several more quotations I’d like to offer.  This deals with the issue of expulsion of Muslims from Europe with a clear parallel to the policy of transfer advocated by Israeli nationalist rightists (including Lieberman, though in a slightly more refined articulation).  The call to action that concludes it is chilling and reveals that all that separates Breivik from Geller, Spencer et al. is the former’s willingness to take up arms, while the the latter do everything but:

Future deportations of Muslims from Europe

“It’s difficult to discuss deportation of Muslims openly in a society where it is not even allowed to discuss Islam…”

The reason why authors on the Eurabia related issues/Islamisation of Europe – Fjordman, Spencer, Ye’or, Bostom etc. aren’t actively discussing deportation is because the method is considered too extreme (and thus would damage their reputational shields). This would un-doubtfully undermine their work and probably disallowing them to publish any future books. However, the warning about Islam has been repeated for more than two decades and it is apparent that 40 more years of dialogue, without action, would have a devastating effect on Europe. If these authors are to scared to propagate a conservative revolution and armed resistance then other authors will have to.

Here Breivik outlines the need to rid oneself of the human impulse for mercy in this Christian conservative revolutionary jihad.  This passage distills his method to its pure essence:

The process of destroying and replacing the current cultural Marxist/ multiculturalist regimes of Western Europe will not be easy or painless….

As a Justiciar Knight you are operating as a jury, judge and executioner on behalf of all free Europeans. Never forget that it is not only your right to act against the tyranny of the cultural Marxist/multiculturalist elites of Europe, it is your duty to do so.  There are situations in which cruelty is necessary, and refusing to apply necessary cruelty is a betrayal of the people whom you wish to protect.

The preferred method is to attack in a violent and deceptive form (shock attack), usually with limited forces (1-2 individuals).  Once you decide to strike, it is better to kill too many than not enough, or you risk reducing the desired ideological impact of the strike. Explain what you have done (in an announcement distributed prior to operation) and make certain that everyone understands that we, the free peoples of Europe, are going to strike again and again. Do not apologise, make excuses or express regret for you are acting in self-defence or in a preëmptive manner. In many ways, morality has lost its meaning in our struggle. The question of good and evil is reduced to one simple choice. For every free patriotic European, only one choice remains: Survive or perish. Some innocent will die in our operations as they are simply at the wrong place at the wrong time. Get used the idea. The needs of the many will always surpass the needs of the few.

In a subsequent passage, Breivik notes that the number of acceptable dead in this revolutionary coup d’état would be 45,000 (with 1-million wounded), which corresponds, in his delusional mind, to the numbers that the Marxist political élite have killed in their drive for continental dominance.  He notes that some conservatives also include in the number of those killed aborted fetuses, which raises the number to 2-million.

In this terrorist’s universe, the goal of overturning the Eurabian regime justifies use of weapons of mass destruction including chemical and biological weapons, which he goes to great lengths to specify.  He even speculates on the possibility of negotiating with Israel (noting that Israeli nationalists would be most likely to be sympathetic to his cause) for access to nuclear weapons though he concedes that Israel is unlikely to do so until it sees clear signs that his revolution is nearing success.

Doctor Who Collaborated With Mossad Commits Suicide

Friday, June 17th, 2011

dr yonah elian

Dr. Yonah Elian, conscience-stricken for allowing Mossad to exploit his medical knowledge (Yediot Achronot)

Tonight I’m going to tell a sad story, but an instructive one.  It begins with the tragic news that an 88 year-old retired Israeli doctor, respected in his profession for many decades, committed suicide in his Ramat Aviv apartment.  The man’s son said his father had been very sick, so it is no surprise that the doctor took his life.  So far there is nothing unusual in this story.  Until you begin to unravel the man’s history.

He was Dr. Yonah Elian, for two decades the Mossad’s favorite doctor, the man they took along on delicate operations in which they required an anesthesiologist to sedate a victim who was to be kidnapped or otherwise incapacitated.  Elian worked especially closely with Rafi Eitan, one of Israel’s storied spymasters who captured Eichmann and less heroically, “ran” Jonathan Pollard.  The doctor was part of the team that kidnapped Eichman in Argentina and sedated him so that they could transport him back to Israel where he was later executed.

Elian also inadvertently killed one of the Mossad’s targets on one of these missions.  In 1954, the Mossad got word that an Israeli engineer, Capt. Alexander “Avner” Israel, was offering military secrets to the Egyptians in Europe.  Dubbing it Operation Bren (p. 4 ff.), they hastily dispatch a team to kidnap him and bring him back to Israel to stand trial for treason.  The team found their quarry quickly through the use of a “honeypot” female agent (shades of Mordechai Vanunu) who lured him to a romantic Paris rendezvous.  Then Elian sedated him and the victim was hustled off to an Israeli military transport plane.  Unfortunately, the plane had to make several refueling stops and each time he was sedated anew.  Apparently this anesthesiologist didn’t realize there were limits to how much sedation a human being could take and he gave the man an overdose and he died.

When the plane landed and they discovered they’d killed him they decided there should be no evidence left behind.  To accomplish the cover-up, they promptly took off once again and dumped the body in the Mediterranean Sea.  Isser Harel, then Mossad chief, never told the victim’s family a word about the man’s death.  No compensation was ever offered for the murder.  As Prof. Shlomo Spiro wrote in a paper on the subject of ethics[!] in the field of Israeli intelligence:

The Mossad then obliterated every reference to the man in Israeli official files, and the case kept secret for five decades.  Generations of Mossad officers heard rumors of this failed operation, many knew the details, but nothing was done to inform Alexander’s family or provide for their support.

In those days, Israeli intelligence could obliterate such a failure and so avoid scandal.  Not so today, though God knows it tries.

In his comments about Dr. Elian, Rafi Eitan lied when he said that the doctor never compromised his Hippocratic Oath. Of course he did.  Certainly when he killed the IDF officer, but arguably even when he helped capture Eichmann.  Yes, you may argue that Eichmann was one of the world’s great mass murderers and that anything that could be done to apprehend him should be done.  But a doctor lives by a different professional standard.  And a doctor may not use his medical expertise in a way that will lead to the death of a patient.

I wonder what Dr. Elian thought of these moral conundrums with which he lived when he died.  If he had any he rarely expressed them.  Even to his family.  But several years before his death, Dr. Elian did tell his son (Hebrew) that he was terribly conflicted about what he’d done to Eichmann because it violated his Hippocratic oath.  Every attempt by the family to remind him of the significance of bringing the great Nazi monster to justice fell on death ears, the son recounts.

When the Knesset attempted to give Dr. Elian a certificate of appreciation for his service to the country, he would only accept it anonymously and would not attend the ceremony himself.  He sent his son in his place.

The doctor’s son also tells the strange story of how he parted with his father before he left for the Eichmann operation.  Dr. Elian woke his twins and told them he would be away on business in Eilat for a few days.  Over a week later he returned with a gift–a toy pistol with an ivory handle.  The son remembers marveling at the gift and thinking what wonderful things they had in Eilat!

Despite this, one can tell that this was a man of depth, subtlety and nuance.  A man who realized the moral contradictions of the life he lived.  A man haunted by ghosts.  This is everything that today’s Israel is not.  Today’s Israel has no moral doubts.  It only has certainties.  As a result it can do much more damage than Dr. Elian.  At least he stopped his service to the Mossad when Rafi Eitan ceased his role as chief of operations for the Mossad.

Certainly, I can’t argue that a man who lived out a long life was thinking of the ways he failed his professional oath as he took his life.  After all, if this was highest in his mind he might’ve done so earlier.  Likely, a terminal illness served as the motivating force for his last act.  But still…

This story takes on added significance in light of the knowledge that U.S. doctors have collaborated with the CIA and military intelligence in the interrogation and torture of Al Qaeda suspects, thus violating their Hippocratic Oath.  This has led to various professional organizations condemning exploitation of their profession for the sake of intelligence gathering.

In fact, the Israeli Medical Association has taken a similar stand here.  But there remain numerous reports (and here) of doctors who betray the ethics of their profession in service to the spymasters and torturers.  At least Dr. Elian had the good conscience to regret his collaboration.

Performance Optimization WordPress Plugins by W3 EDGE