Muslim and Jewish Women in Nazareth

'We can live in peace'...John Lennon (photo: Dafna Tal)

Mahzor

Mahzor

New York Public Library

Churches

Sarajevo Haggadah

Mah Nishtanah

Sarajevo haggadah

Antaea Darom

Israeli women's art

Action

Torah as music

Ben Heine

Action

ceramic bowl

Mohammad Said Kalash, "Offering Reconciliation" exhibit (photo: Ilan Amihai)

Action

Punch and Judy/Pinchas and Jamila

Avi Katz

Action

David Grossman

Ben Heine

Action

Eldrige Street shul

Lower East Side

Action

Dove

Ben Heine

Action

Two birds

Hoda Jamal

Action

Israeli and Palestinian boys

from documentary, Promises

Action

Cat in the Hat

Yiddish version

Action

Daylight through the Wall

Banksy: graffiti art on Separation Wall

Action

Maurice Sendak's Brundibar set

New Victory Theater (photo: Nan Melville/NYT)

Action

Daniel Barenboim, West-Eastern Divan Orchestra

Palestinian-Israeli musical ensemble (photo: Kerstin Joensson/AP)

Action

Great Day on Eldrige Street

N.Y.'s klezmer greats celebrate shul rededication (photo: Leo Sorel)

Action

Joint Appeal for Peace

(Avi Katz)

Joint Appeal for Peace

Ketubah, Ancona, Italy (1772)

(Jewish Theological Seminary library)

Ancona ketubah

Posts Tagged ‘hamas’

‘Moral Politics’ TV Interview on Mossad Dubai Assassination

Monday, March 15th, 2010


Watch Mossad Assassination in Dubai.

Yesterday, I filmed a 30 minute interview with Bill Alford for his Moral Politics TV show about the Mossad assassination of Hamas leader Mahmoud al-Mabouh in Dubai.  It’s a handy introduction to the many posts I’ve written on the subject and roves over territory like targeted assassinations, the Mossad’s trampling on the identities and rights of its own citizens, the U.S. connection to the crime, the impact of the Holocaust on Israel’s psychic and political life, and much more.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Mossad Assassins Draw Red Interpol Cards

Wednesday, March 10th, 2010

Mossad draws a red card (Getty Images)

In a soccer match, when the referee draws a red card the player is ejected.  In international law enforcement, when Interpol issues a red card you damn well better be in a secure place and never raise your head to see the light of day.  This means that the 27 Mossad agents implicated by Dubai in the al-Mabouh hit will be in cold storage for a long time and unavailable for any future heroics in the international battle of the Jewish people against Islamic terror (that’s meant ironically):

Interpol said it would join an international task force investigating the Dubai assassination of Hamas official Mahmoud al-Mabhouh and issued “red notices” on Monday for 16 more suspects.

The notices…bring to 27 the number of suspects that Interpol is assisting Dubai’s search for connected to the Jan. 19 murder of Mr. Mabhouh…

“The creation of the task force and the publication of the new Red Notices came as investigative information provided by the authorities in Dubai bore out the international links and broad scope of the number of people involved,” Interpol wrote in a statement.

The agency also explained why a first group of 11 suspects were identified before the additional 16. It said that the first 11 were a “core group alleged to have carried out the killing” while the second group of 16 “is believed to have aided and abetted the first team by closely watching, following and reporting Al Mabhouh’s movements from the moment he landed at Dubai airport until his murder.”

The red notices lend additional credibility to the case being assembled here…

By pressing for the international alerts, the Dubai authorities are “throwing the ball in the court of the Western police forces,” says Riad Kahwaji, head of the Institute for Near East and Gulf Military Analysis here…The authorities here are sending the message that they are doing all they can…If nothing happens “it would make the international community look bad,” he says. They are saying, “if you can’t do your job, then don’t blame Dubai.”

In case you thought that the Mossad had exhausted its portion of sheer brazenness in this murder case, rest assured it has not.  Bloomberg reports that the pre-paid debit cards issued fraudulently to the assassins by an Israeli-American company, Payoneer, with potential ties to Israeli intelligence, allowed the assassins who entered the U.S. after the killing to actually work in this country.  Yes, I know it’s hard to believe.  But the Mossad is nothing if not ballsy:

Suspected assassins of a Hamas leader in Dubai “fraudulently” acquired prepaid payroll cards and stole identities to obtain jobs at U.S. companies, according to card-issuer MetaBank. Authorities informed Meta, a unit of publicly traded Meta Financial Group Inc., that the suspects used fake passports to get cards issued by the firm and other banks, according to an e- mailed statement from Meta yesterday.

Paul Woodward asks the excellent question: which companies?  Of course, they would be companies that either would provide cover for their spy identities or allow them to pursue their assassination plans (or both).  I’d love to know though whether any of these companies enjoy, like Payoneer, extraordinarily close ties to Israeli intelligence agencies or those affiliated with the Israel lobby.

Friends of Mossad (perhaps an idea for a new Israeli NGO?) have been busy, eager beavers spreading the good news about how the agency rid the world of a nasty piece of work and should be wished a hearty mazel tov for doing our dirty work for us.  A splendid example of this is the notorious Judy Miller, of faux WMD fame, writing in the Jewish Tabloid (er, Tablet).  She breathlessly recounts in vivid prose, doubtless due either to her overactive imagination or cozy ties with Israeli intelligence and aligned journalists, previous Israeli assassination attempts against al-Mabouh.  The takeaway: Mossad always gets their man.

Note but one example of her love affair with spooks and gooks, no matter whether they’re Scooter Libby or Meir Dagan:

As an Israeli reporter put it to me, al-Mabhouh’s death was a “two-fer”—a man who from Israel’s standpoint deserved killing not only for having murdered Israelis in the past, but also because he was buying weapons from Iran that would be used to kill Israelis in the future.

Did you recoil as I did when you read the word “twofer,” as if you’d just heard a joke in especially bad taste?  But this is Judy Miller, the queen of slavish devotion to every bad habit of every overreaching intelligence agency from DC to Tel Aviv. Further, Judy seeks to deflect blame from the Mossad and turn it back on Dubai.  You see, it wasn’t the fault of the actual assassins, but of Dubai which didn’t stop them before they snuffed their quarry:

Emirati and Hamas officials, both apparently eager to blame the victim rather than themselves for failing to prevent the murder, criticized Mabhouh for having been lax about his own security.

Further weakening the case against Israel, Miller claims that Arab states are actually happy about the killing:

…The operation…has fascinated the world, infuriated Hamas, and been quietly condoned by many Arab states…

In fact, so “quietly condoned” that none seem to have breathed a word about their satisfaction–except to Judy of course.

Judy really should be writing for Rupert Murdoch, one of Israel’s greatest media supporters.  But Rupert has someone already on the job–the managing editor of Australia’s largest daily, Alan Howe, who is Mossad’s biggest fan Down Under.  Howe expects an updated version of Munich any day now featuring those he-men and daring women who offed Mahmoud al-Mabouh:

THE good thing about Israel quite correctly eliminating threats to its existence is that it is undertaken professionally. We seldom lose anyone of worth and there’s normally a ripper film celebrating it.

After the murder of 11 Israeli athletes at the Munich Olympics, then prime minister Golda Meir famously said: “Send forth the boys.” It became Operation Wrath of God in which dozens of the organisers of the atrocity were hunted down and killed over two decades…Wrath of God produced Sword of Gideon and Steven Spielberg’s Munich. Perhaps there’ll soon be 9 Minutes in Dubai.

I asked Sol Salbe, who pointed me to this drivel, who this moron was, hoping he’d tell me he was some Australian version of Steven Plaut, a ranting pro-Israel wingnut.  No such luck, as I mention above.  Thanks to Rupert, the Mossad has a huge fan planted in the editor’s chair at Melbourne’s and Australia’s largest daily.  The Mossad has it made in the shade.

David Kimche

David Kimche, Mossad's next target for identity theft?

I did have one rather modest proposal for the Mossad. Since 27 out of what one journalist claimed were 48 agents called kidonim, or trained assassins, have been outed, I can at least offer one new identity that it would be safe for the Mossad to appropriate. Yesterday, one of Israel’s greatest modern civil servants and spies died, David Kimche. He rose in the ranks of the Mossad to become deputy director before moving to the foreign ministry where he became director general (chief of staff).

Kimche was remarkable in his pragmatic, but idiosyncratic views. Most recently, he advocated Israeli negotiations with Hamas. He also signed the 2003 Geneva Initiative. He served during a time when Israeli leaders were known for actually having strategic ideas and ethical principles. Alas, we will not see his like again.

What is convenient for the Mossad is that Kimche was an English Jew and therefore a prime suspect for identity/passport theft. If you’ll note this 1983 photo, he sports glasses and what looks to possbily be a toupee. I’d maintain this would be a perfect disguise for the next Dubai-type assassination. And the crowning good of this proposal is that Kimche won’t be needing his British passport any time soon. Go to it, Mr. Dagan and colleagues.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Interpol Warrants Against Dagan, Netanyahu Likely

Saturday, February 20th, 2010

The Dubai police have announced that they plan to introduce in the coming days new evidence in the Mossad assassination of Hamas’ Mahmoud al-Mabouh that traces the crime directly to the agency and its Herziliya headquarters. When that happens, the police chief indicated he would ask Interpol to file arrest warrants for Mossad chief Meir Dagan and Bibi Netanyahu:

An insider close to the case confirmed that Mr Dagan and Binyamin Netanyahu, the Israeli Prime Minister, are top of the Gulf state’s wanted list.

Gordon Thomas, in his otherwise hagiographic, simpering article spouting Mossad’s praises makes crystal clear that all assassinations are formally approved by the prime minister himself.  So the chance that he can duck culpability are nonexistent.  Thomas also reveals that the Mossad has only 48 personnel assigned to its assassinations team.  11 have now been publicly exposed and will never be able to play any public role in future.  That would leave a fairly large hole in the program for some time unless they have recruits and trainees waiting in the wings to step in for the next hit.  One wonders what will be the disguise of choice next time around.  Tennis has definitely jumped the shark.

Another factor that widens the net in this crime is that the killers possessed five American-issued credit cards which they used to buy airline tickets to Dubai.  It would seem that someone in the Mossad actually wanted to widen the band of nation’s implicated in the crime, thus hoping that the more countries involved the less any one of them would wish to delve too deeply into the matter.  If the Obama administration was as concerned about this as it would be say, if Hamas or Hezbollah used an American credit card in the process of assassinating an Israeli, then it would allow the FBI to become involved in the case in a robust way, which would only make it more likely that we would get to the bottom of this mess of a matter.  But the chances that this president has any desire to stick his hand into this hornet’s nest and stir up the Israel lobby are nil.

That rumination above about hypocrisy in our treatment of political assassins and their victims is highlighted via this interesting comment from Geoffrey Wheatcroft, who:

…Highlights a blatant double standard between the treatment of terrorists of different nationalities and hues. The word “racist” is overused, but in this context it applies all too accurately.

In other words, the nations of the world are able and willing to nod and wink at an Israeli assassination of a Hamas leader, but if the shoe were on the other foot they would be after Hamas hammer and tong.  If this were an Iranian assassination we might be at war presently.  What puts Israel is a separate category?  And isn’t it time we treat every such assassination with the same outrage and determination to see justice done?

Two former Gazans who are affiliated with Fatah and apparently knew al-Mabouh when he lived there may have lured him to Dubai for the fatal meeting.  It appears that the Palestinians were turned by the Mossad and became the catalysts for the operation.  Such a development will further diminish Fatah as a viable political force since it will be seen as the source of those who betray their fellow Palestinians for a price or whatever blandishment persuaded them to become an agent of the Israelis.  These suspects are probably spilling their guts to the Dubai authorities as we speak, which is likely why they speak with such authority about the new information further implicating the Mossad to come out in coming days.

The circus continues.  This entire episode makes you long for the days when British-born Ephraim Halevy ran Mossad and it could be counted on to have some semblance of constraint, caution, and compunction.  All that has flown to the winds by the imperious Dagan who was advised by the Israeli PM who appointed him to perform the job with a “knife in his teeth.”  Sounds like he’d read too many pirate stories.

One can only hope that the perspective of this report from the Guardian turns out to be true:

The Dubai assassination…may yet turn out to be far more damaging – not least because the political and diplomatic context has changed in the last decade. Israel’s reputation has suffered an unprecedented battering, reaching a new low during last year’s Operation Cast Lead in the Gaza Strip. “In the current climate, the traces left behind in Dubai are likely to lead to very serious harm to Israel’s international standing,” the former diplomat Alon Liel commented yesterday.

One indication of such a development is this story, which can’t make the Israeli government happy.  Bernard Kouchner, France’s foreign ministry is using the killing as proof positive of the immediate need for an independent Palestinian state.  I hear an echo of a recently shelved EU initiative which would have done precisely that.  Reopening this plan would be a most welcome result of the botched Dubai murder.

I’m thinking of establishing an award for most sycophantic pro-Mossad media puff piece of the day.  Today’s award definitely goes to this one from Haaretz which is puerile in every possible way.  Not only that, it strives to find a silver lining in every cloud including this one which bizarrely claims the photographs of the Mossad agents revealed by the Dubai police might not be those of the real agents:

…There is no guarantee that those photographs actually show their real faces.

Wha?  Did they all have plastic surgery before the operation or will they all have plastic surgery now?  Whose faces are they?  And what are Issacharoff and Harel talking about?  It makes the whole caper into even more of a bad Hollywood spy thriller than it already is.  And to think that I once admired Ami Issacharoff because he stood next to a Palestinian home during a settler melee to ensure the family inside wouldn’t be incinerated by the pogromists.  His new Haaretz blog, by the way, is aptly entitled the MESS Report.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Dubai Assassination: Fisk Claims European Collaboration

Wednesday, February 17th, 2010

I know that Robert Fisk has his fans and detractors.  I’m personally neutral on the subject as I don’t read him regularly enough to have the confidence I do, say that Ethan Bronner or Tom Friedman are intelligent journalist-shills for the Israeli establishment.  But Fisk has written an intriguing, suggestive column today claiming that European intelligence agencies collaborated with Israel in the assassination of Mahmoud al-Mabouh.  The information is based on a Dubai source that Fisk trusts implicitly:

The United Arab Emirates suspect…that Europe’s “security collaboration” with Israel has crossed a line into illegality, where British passports (and those of other EU nations) can now be used to send Israeli agents into the Gulf to kill Israel’s enemies.

…A source – impeccable, I know him, spoke with the authority I know he has in Abu Dhabi – to say that “the British passports are real. They are hologram pictures with the biometric stamp. They are not forged or fake. The names were really there. If you can fake a hologram or biometric stamp, what does this mean?”

…”The command room of the operation was in Austria… meaning the suspects when here did not talk to each other but thru the command room on separate lines to avoid detection or linking themselves to one another…

“We have identified five credit cards belonging to these people, all issued in the United States.”

…The Emirates claim that the passport of an Israeli agent sent to kill a Hamas leader in Jordan was a genuine Canadian passport issued to a dual national of Israel.

…For an Arab Gulf country which suspects its former masters (the UK, by name) may have connived in the murder of a visiting Hamas official, this is apparently now too much. There is much more to come out of this story.

I’m scratching my head.  I literally don’t know what to make of this.  I have compared this caper to the CIA’s kidnapping and rendition of a radical imam in Italy several years ago in which the Italian security services colluded.  Through incredibly sloppy execution, the culprits were exposed, leading to a highly embarrassing trial.  Could it be that the Mossad arranged for the cooperation of British intelligence in this incident?  Could the Brits have been wanting to send a message to Iran, that the west would act to inhibit Iran’s weapons dealing and trouble making in other Middle East countries?

I have to say that given what a bad reputation law enforcement and justice has in the Emirates, I’m amazed that the Dubai police have progressed as far as they have as quickly as they have.  I wonder whether they in turn have the cooperation of other foreign intelligence services who were shadowing the Israelis?  All speculation, mind you.

The Independent also reports al-Mabouh was lured to Dubai by the Mossad, which may explain the collaboration of two Palestinians who’ve been extradited from Jordan and are undergoing interrogation.  The Guardian also adds that a Kuwait newspaper quotes a “well-informed source” (how’s that for air tight sourcing?) claiming that a senior Hamas operative was arrested by Syrian intelligence and is suspected of accompanying al-Mabouh on his trip and of “giving him up” to the Mossad.  Some elements of this story are amplified by Maariv, which to me is a red flag.  So I would treat this development as suggestive but not definitive.

Gideon Levy displays his usual moral acuity in his own Haaretz column about the killing:

Let’s suppose the Dubai assassination project had worked out well. Mahmoud al-Mabhouh would have received his kiss of death, the assassins would have returned safe and sound to their bases, and no Israeli would have run into identity complications. And then? Mahmoud’s place would have been taken by Mohammed, who also would have tried to kill Israeli soldiers and smuggle Iranian arms into Gaza. Perhaps the heir would even outperform his predecessor, as has happened in several previous liquidations.

We eliminated Abbas al-Musawi? Well done, Israel Defense Forces. We got Hassan Nasrallah. We killed Ahmed Yassin? Well done, Shin Bet security service. We got a Hamas many times stronger. Abu Jihad was eliminated? Well done to the Sayeret Matkal special forces unit – of course, according to foreign news reports. We killed a potential partner, relatively moderate and charismatic. As a bonus, we got revenge attacks like those after “the Engineer” Yihyeh Ayash was slain. We also got the danger hovering over every Israeli and Jew in the world each anniversary of the assassination of Imad Mughniyeh, which was also blamed on Israel.

…Between you and me, what are we prouder of, the cherry tomatoes we developed here or assassinations?

Here in this country we’ve debated whether torture overall is an effective tool of counter-terrorism.  We haven’t debated enough the utility of targeted assassination which we’ve adopted in Afghanistan and Iraq, emulating again the IDF and Israeli intelligence.  I maintain that ulitmately  assassination does not work.  Even if you embrace such murder as a counter-terror tool (which I do not), it is at best a stopgap tactical measure that is the equivalent of sticking your finger in the dyke to hold back the ocean.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

All Signs Implicate Mossad in Dubai Assassination

Tuesday, February 16th, 2010


After several weeks of confusion regarding the identity of the assassins of Mahmoud al-Mabouh, the Hamas weapons buyer who was assassinated recently in Dubai, all signs are beginning to point in the Mossad’s direction.  The BBC reports that all of the passports used were fraudulent.  The most telling piece of evidence uncovered is that four five of the eleven killers used names of actual Israeli citizens (Update: Jerusalem Post claims seven of eleven were Israeli olim) who appear not to have been involved in the murder.  One of them told the post “I went to sleep with pneumonia and woke up a murderer.” He is also quoted by the BBC:

Melvyn Adam Mildiner, a Briton living in Israel, told Reuters news agency: “I am obviously angry, upset and scared – any number of things. And I’m looking into what I can do to try to sort things out and clear my name.

Of two of the other Israelis, one is a handyman and the other an Orthodox yeshiva student.  Though I’m not schooled in covert intelligence operations, it would seem to me that using the identities of citizens of your own country would be pretty stupid as it would point directly to the Mossad as the culprit.  Not to mention the jeopardy in which it places these individuals.  What is to prevent a Hamas loyalist from tracking the real Melvyn Mildiner and do him in as revenge for the al-Mabouh killing?

And alternatively, using fraudulent passports of foreign countries also risks creating diplomatic incidents with them.  In fact, Israel has been mounting pressure on Britain to change a law that allows filing of arrest warrants against Israeli officials for war crimes.  Given that Israel used multiple fraudulent British passports in this operation, why should that government go out of its way to do anything on Israel’s behalf?  If Tzipi Livni wants to go to England to test the validity of her arrest warrant, why should Gordon Brown care a whit?  Let her go to jail.  Then Britain, Dubai and Israel can work out a prisoner swap involving her and the real killers, who belong in the dock for this assassination.

Dubai officials have previously said that if Israel is implicated they will issue an arrest warrant for Bibi himself.

The BBC story also points to other similarities with past Israeli assassinations–among them the use of foreign (Canadian) passports in Amman when the Mossad attempted unsuccessfully to kill Khaled Meshal.  As I noted earlier, in that operation they also injected the victim with a poison meant to mimic a heart attack.  The goal being to allow the killers time to exit the country before the real cause of death could be diagnosed.  In that case, the Mossad agents were caught and arrested and Bibi Netanyahu, also prime minister then, was forced to provide the antidote.  Meshal lived.  In the al-Mabouh case, the killing method worked and they successfully escaped.  But the aftermath of the crime will turn out much messier I reckon.

As the noose tightens around the Mossad as the culprit, this matter threatens to become an international incident both for the massive fraud involving use of foreign passports, the abuse of hospitality of an Arab country which doesn’t want to roll over and play dead, and a rising willingness to treat Israeli crimes as matters worthy of international tribunals:

“This is a highly sophisticated operation conducted by people who knew when Al Mabhouh would arrive in the country,” Dahi said.

The suspects used “highly sophisticated communication instruments” and during their conversations they used encrypted messages, Dahi said. “The communication tools they used are not available in the UAE.”

They came from several European countries and left to European destinations and one to Hong Kong. “We know where they are right now and even their residences,” Dahi said.

What I don’t understand about this is how political assassination serves any sort of long-term political purpose.  So you kill someone.  What damage ultimately do you do to your enemy?  He replaces the victim with someone either as good or better than the one you eliminated.  Does it get you anywhere?  Does it achieve any sort of objective?  I would argue that Israel is now beyond the point when it can use the conventional tools of war or assassination to harm its enemies.  The world is beginning to indicate it will no longer allow Israel to get away with these crimes.  I used to say that ultimately Israel will pay a price for these idiocies.  Now, I don’t say ultimately, because the chickens are coming home to roost right now.

If you’d like to see a perfect example of the “old” thinking at work, read this garbage journalism which proposes that this entire episode is much ado about nothing:

…Many of the countries whose passports were allegedly used do not like Hamas; and the government of Dubai, despite its impressive investigation, does not really want to get to the bottom of this. Dubai would like to continue giving off the impression that it is a safe country, all of whose visitors are there for only business or tourism.

There are other Arab countries who do not consider Hamas a friend and who are in a secret war – no less bitter than Israel’s – against the Islamist organization. Jordan is one of them, as is Egypt.

As part of the investigation two Palestinians were arrested in Dubai, suspected of aiding the assassination team, and it is not impossible that the whole story is another example of the sort of psychological warfare against Hamas that would have the organization become even more suspicious of flawed security within its ranks.

Looking at the incident in perspective, a senior Hamas figure responsible for the deaths of two Israel Defense Forces soldiers and a key contact in the group’s arms smuggling is dead.

…Unless dramatic evidence is found to definitively prove an Israeli connection, it is likely that the State of Israel will emerge from this affair unblemished and the Mossad will continue enjoying a reputation of fearless determination and nearly unstoppable capabilities.

Where I come from there is supposed to be at least a semblance of distance between journalism and spookdom. Not apparently in Israel and not even in the pages of Haaretz.

I would like to see Dubai take out Interpol warrants for these Israeli murderers.  Then I would like to see Dubai request that the ICC try them when they are caught.  I would like Israeli progressives to watch out for these people and report them when they see them so they can be identified even if they choose to stay in Israel where they can’t be captured.  No more impunity.

The BBC offers a history of Israeli political assassinations.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Burston on Gaza War as Root of All Israeli Evil

Sunday, February 14th, 2010

Brad Burston, Haaretz’s columnist can be a helluva fine writer.  I’ve written at least one laudatory post about him.  After doing so, I read pieces by Burston which seemed almost to be written by a different person.  They were churlish pieces attacking Israel’s Jewish critics.  I chalked it up to a journalist feeling that it was his duty to show he could criticize both the right and left.  I thought I would never find a reason to write about his work again, till tonight.

Burston has written one of the most powerful, cogent and hard-hitting critiques–not only of the Gaza war, but of the current mess in which Israel finds itself in–I’ve ever read.  Seemingly every Israeli NGO or peace activist is under savage attack.  At the present moment, Israel faces a civil liberties crisis as dire as the U.S. faced during the McCarthy era.  The New Israel Fund, a classical Zionist NGO if there ever was one, is under mortal threat.  Its leader, Naomi Hazan has been publicly and graphically attacked in terms that would’ve made Goebbels proud.  Richard Goldstone has been called a traitor to his people.  Alan Dershowitz as much as put a price on his head.  Jewish women have been arrested for trying to leyn Torah at the Wall.

So it is like a balm in Gilead to read such graceful, soaring language from Burston:

This is about fear of the dark. Of the monstrous. In this case, the terror of finally uncovering what we ourselves are really made of.

This is about the lengths we will go, and the depths, in order to protect what we so desperately need to believe about ourselves. This is about how many others we will need to blame, vilify, assault, scapegoat and smear, before we actually take one wholly honest long look in the mirror.

This is about the war we made in Gaza, and what it did to Israel. This is about how Israel’s conduct of the war has done more damage to the Jewish state than all the thousands and thousands of Palestinian rockets and mortar shells put together. It has been a year and more since a truce was called in Gaza, and – thanks in no small part to Israel’s freely admitted policy of hamstringing and stonewalling UN investigators – the world is still at war with Israel.

The result is only now becoming felt. In a thousand ways, in new ways every single day, we have brought the war home.

Israel’s battle plan, which effectively called for bludgeoning Hamas and the whole of Gaza into a state of shock, had the further effect, intentional or not, of inducing shock in Israel itself.

Here Burston presents a daring thesis for an Israeli audience–that Goldstone was right:

In some cases, shock expresses itself in combativeness. A lashing out even at those who are trying to help.

In our state of shock, we were unable to see that Richard Goldstone was trying to save us. And that the Goldstone Report is exactly what Israel needs. We fought him every step of the way, convincing ourselves – just as in Gaza – that the unfolding catastrophe was the best of the available scenarios.

Had Israel cooperated with the panel, it might have begun to learn how to prevent another war like this one, and how to fight future wars entirely differently. Only now, with the shock beginning to subside, have Israeli military and legal officials begun publicly to concede that battling the Goldstone panel was a colossal blunder.

Burston here also propounds an unpopular idea in Israeli circles, that the Gaza siege is as much a blunder as the war itself was.  And this argument segues into the most important point of his column–that the war has led inexorably to the current attack on Israeli democracy and the peace movement:

And it is this Israeli government, in continuing its siege of Gaza, in denying Gazans access to concrete and other materials needed to rebuild homes destroyed by Israeli fire during Cast Lead, that lends further credence to the Goldstone Report’s suspicions that Israel’s policy has been and continues to be one of collective punishment of a civilian population.

Despite the nightmarish numbers of civilians killed in Gaza, the right has argued again and again that the problem with the war was that it was not pursued aggressively enough. Now, at home, they are getting their way. Finally, the war is being pressed to the full – with peace activists and human rights workers as the primary targets.

The Dahiya Doctrine of overkill and unimaginable, unremitting force, is being applied against the elements of Israeli society most strongly defending democracy and elemental rights. Finally, the war at home is being run the way the right wants. No holds barred. A fresh new onslaught on democracy every single day.

And if his thundering column had ended with the following passage I would’ve called it a masterwork of decency and humanity:

The Goldstone Report is, indeed, deeply flawed. But it is exactly what Israel needs. A deeply flawed report for a deeply flawed country. A country which will not, and cannot, begin to heal itself, repair itself, right itself, unless it faces with honesty and courage the issues and allegations raised by the report.

As long as Israel ducks the report, and keeps buried the whole truth about Cast Lead, it will not recover from this state of shock. Israel will be more vulnerable than ever to destruction from within.

But alas, he didn’t.  And this goes to my criticism of Burston, where he seems to lose the courage of his convictions and lapses into standard anti-Palestinian rhetoric:

Gaza, ruled by a Hamas which wants to see Israel exterminated – and which has only grown richer, better armed, and more popular as a result of the Israeli embargo – will continue to hold the whole of Israel in a crippling, withering, ultimately destructive state of siege.

The notion that Hamas wants Israel exterminated is a beloved trope of the very Israeli right Burston has spent this entire column deriding.  I have no problem with criticizing Hamas.  But if you want to do that you have a responsibility to do it accurately and precisely.  And this anti-Hamas slur is neither accurate nor fair.  But I do very much like Burston’s closing image of a Hamas which, by the very nature of Israel’s siege of Gaza, holds Israel under siege as well.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Republican Jewish Coalition: Kampeas, Besser ‘Leftist Propagandists, Weasels’

Friday, February 12th, 2010

The RJC tweet smeared round the world

The RJC may not realize it but if there is any justice in the world they’ve just stepped in a big pile of dog poop and some staffer’s head should roll.

First a little back story: recently 54 members of Congress and major peace groups (among them Peace Now, J Street and B’Tselem) sent separate letters to Pres. Obama urging him to pressure Israel to relieve the siege of Gaza.  The letters were groundbreaking for several reasons. First, I can’t remember the last time a large group of Congress members and Mideast peace groups coordinated any political activity so publicly and forcefully.  Second, never before have members of Congress been so bold as to call outright for the end of the savage suffering inflicted by this illegal siege.  This is yet another nail in the coffin of the Israel lobby and its stranglehold over such discourse in Washington DC.  In the past, publicly advocating a position sympathetic to Palestinians would have been absolute anathema.

I’m proud to declare that Jim McDermott, my House member, drafted this statement and spearheaded it together with the first Muslim-American member, Keith Ellison.  The Forward covered the story.  Here is a portion of the statement directed to Pres. Obama:

Thank you for your…commitment of $300 million in U.S. aid to rebuild the Gaza Strip. We write to you with great concern about the ongoing crisis in Gaza.

The people of Gaza have suffered enormously since the blockade imposed by Israel and Egypt following Hamas’ coup, and particularly following Operation Cast Lead. We also sympathize deeply with the people of southern Israel who have suffered from abhorrent rocket and mortar attacks. We recognize that the Israeli government has imposed restrictions on Gaza out of a legitimate and keenly felt fear of continued terrorist action by Hamas and other militant groups. This concern must be addressed without resulting in the de facto collective punishment of the Palestinian residents of the Gaza Strip. Truly, fulfilling the needs of civilians in Israel and Gaza are mutually reinforcing goals.

The unabated suffering of Gazan civilians highlights the urgency of reaching a resolution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, and we ask you to press for immediate relief for the citizens of Gaza as an urgent component of your broader Middle East peace efforts. The current blockade has severely impeded the ability of aid agencies to do their work to relieve suffering, and we ask that you advocate for immediate improvements for Gaza…

The peace groups’ letter is slightly more forceful in addressing the siege:

We urge, therefore, that your administration use America’s unique relationship with Israel to persuade it to lift the closure of its border crossing with Gaza now.

Of course, the counter-attack has been hot and heavy.  Yvette Clark (D, Brooklyn), who is African-American renounced her support when Agudath Israel, the far-right pro-Israel Orthodox group, organized constituents to read her the riot act and publicly humiliated her at a meeting they called.  She obediently announced her capitulation.

Further, the slimeballs at the Republican Jewish Coalition have gotten in on the act.  And when they do you know something really, really dirty will come out of it.  The RJC has done nothing less than accuse two veteran Jewish journalists, Ron Kampeas (JTA) and James Besser (Jewish Week) of being “leftist propagandists and weasels.”

Why?  Because they dared to question the truth and accuracy of claims the RJC made in attacking the Congressional letter.  Kampeas had the temerity to accuse the RJC of telling an “untruth” in this statement:

These 54 Democrats expressed no concern whatsoever about the consequences their ideas might have for Israelis living under the threat of terrorism from Gaza!

Anyone who can read can see from the above passage that the Democrats who signed this letter expressed strong support for the residents of Sderot.

Besser also did something unpardonable: he implied the RJC was being racist and misleading in identifying the letter solely with its Muslim-American co-sponsor, Ellison.  The latter is a convenient target for the Republican Jewish anti-minority machine.  They don’t have much use for African-Americans OR Muslims and Ellison is the ‘daily double’ as far as they’re concerned.

Besser adds this interesting perspective to the controversy about Ellison:

…Everybody wants to blame Ellison, which raises some interesting questions, starting with this one: does being pro-Palestinian automatically mean a politician is anti-Israel? Can someone be friendly and sympathetic to both sides?

…Every time I’ve heard him speak…he’s stressed his belief that both sides in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict need to do more to live up to past commitments and take greater chances for peace. He’s spoken clearly about Israel’s need for security as part of any ultimate settlement.  He speaks the language of compromise – for both sides.

In short, he sounds pro-Palestinian without sounding anti-Israel.

Still, many castigate him  as just another Israel hater, which they seem to find even easier because of his religion.

So I wonder: are pro-Israel forces only interested in working with those who are 100 percent on their side, and defining everybody else as beyond the pale?

So for penning some relatively mild and thoughtful questions for the Israel lobby about why it demonizes everyone it can’t control, you get tarred and feathered and practically called anti-Israel.  Next thing you know they’ll be calling for Kampeas and Besser’s heads on a platter.

I know this is going to sound strange but…in a perverse way this is a good thing.  Yet another example of the lobby overreaching.  They see a chance to go for the jugular and point out the perfidy of Democrats toward Israel.  But by the very nature of their attack they’ve discredited themselves among the lion’s share of American Jewry who are more fair-minded and lucid on these same matters.

So I say: whichever RJC goon tweeted that message about Besser and Kampeas–promote him.  The higher this guy rises to his level of incompetence and pro-Israel fury, the quicker the lobby will be vanquished or turned into something truly pro-Israel.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

IDF Refuses Gaza War Crimes Investigation: Time for ICC Referral

Saturday, January 30th, 2010

Ashkenazi and Barak: Investigation? We don't want your stinking investigation (Nir Kafri)

Both Israel and Hamas have essentially refused to comply with conditions laid down in the Goldstone Report, which called for a serious investigation by each party of the charges of crimes against civilians during the Gaza war.  Justice Goldstone gave each side three months to reply to this condition and that deadline came Friday.  Each party’s reply was feeble, but Israel’s more feeble since it killed considerably more.

Hamas apologized for the three Israeli civilians it killed and said their death was a “mistake.”  Were it not for an even more feeble Israeli response, Hamas’ would’ve earned the derision it deserved.  But Israel’s was classic and all over the place.  In one government leak, it’s claimed Bibi is willing to appoint an investigative panel that would be enfeebled even before it began; with no subpoena power and extremely limited mandate.  One panel member’s name suggested: Alan Dershowitz!  Now comes word that the IDF itself refuses an external investigation:

…The defense establishment appears to be steadfast in its refusal to have the IDF’s monopoly over examination of its actions challenged.

…Senior Jerusalem officials warned that Israel’s response to the UN will not satisfy the international community and that eventually an examination committee that is outside the IDF will have to be appointed to investigate last year’s military operation in the Gaza Strip.

Senior officials in the Prime Minister’s Bureau say that Netanyahu is inclined to accept the justice and foreign ministries’ call for an additional examination, by an extra-military body, into cases in which innocent civilians were harmed during Operation Cast Lead. Netanyahu is convinced that only an independent probe will convince the international community that Israel is serious in its investigation of alleged violations of the law of war.

Actually, this is laughable because the version of an “independent” probe I outlined above will satisfy no one outside the Israeli government, nor should it.

Here’s why:

“To date,” the Israeli report [to the UN defending Operation Cast Lead states, "the IDF has launched investigations into 150 separate incidents arising from the Gaza Operation. Of the 150 incidents, so far 36 have been referred for criminal investigation.

So with 1,100 Gaza civilians killed, the IDF investigated a total of 150 incidents and found only 36 even worthy of a fuller investigation.  Now, we all know the history of the IDF in investigating itself.  If there is any way it can exonerate itself (and there virtually always is unless the heat is on from international sources) it will.  So you can be sure that of the 36 perhaps one, if you're lucky, might result in any punishment at all.  In fact, the only known discipline I've heard of meted out so far to any IDF soldier for acts committed during Cast Lead was a soldier reprimanded for stealing a Gazan credit card.  1,100 civilians killed and all they could find worth punishing was theft of a crummy credit card!  Really, they must be joking.

So I propose that Ban Ki Moon refer the matter to the Security Council, part of the process Goldstone requested prior to asking the International Criminal Court to take up the case in the event the parties do not investigate their own excesses.  One thing's for sure: as soon as mentions Goldstone and ICC in the same sentence, Bibi will announce with a flourish an "independent" Israeli investigation.  It will, of course be toothless, fragmented and ineffectual.  And here is where the world community will be tested.  Will it be satisfied by yet another Israeli charade; or will it call Israel's bluff and take matters further?  Will Security Council members like the U.S. even let anything close to this happen?  Likely they will not.  But my hope is that Pres. Obama will find some way to exert pressure on Israel whether or not he ends up vetoing such a resolution.

Those of you who follow the State of the Union will note that Pres. Obama ignored the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, meaning it's likely he jettisoned it from his current political agenda (along with health care if you can believe the headlines of the NY Times).  This doesn't bode well for the Goldstone Report's future.  But I still remain hopeful that this document will have staying power and continue to rankle Israel (and to a lesser extent Hamas) until they grapple with it in a serious way.