Bush ‘Just Doesn’t Feel Right’ About Joint Abbas-Olmert Meeting

It’s starting to feel a little like kicking a man when he’s down in making fun of the Bush Administration’s cluelessness in pursuing Israeli-Palestinian peace. But I just had to do it given this utterly banal comment by Stephen Hadley featured in an AP interview published in Haaretz:

“This did not seem the time for a big, high-level, three-way event,” Stephen Hadley, Bush’s national security adviser, told reporters. “It just doesn’t feel right as the best way to advance the negotiation.”

Clearly, the reason he won’t be meeting together with Abbas and Olmert is that the two sides have made little or no progress and so such a meeting wouldn’t be productive for Bush. But this also concedes that Bush, in refusing to get them together, either has no interest or ability to prod the sides to come up with new, creative proposals to bridge their divide. The way policymakers talk about issues indicates how well they control their agenda and neither Hadley nor Bush have the least control of these negotiations. Otherwise, Hadley wouldn’t say something as lame as what he said above.

“It’s both symbolic and substantive,” Hadley said of Bush’s trip…

But what it mostly is is useless.

The White House decision for the president to see Abbas only while in Egypt, and not on another visit to the Palestinian territories, raised eyebrows with Palestinians - especially given the lavish attention being paid to Israel’s celebration.

We are, in some sense, all over this process, both in Israel and in terms of the West Bank,” Hadley said. “And I think it just made sense in terms of the president’s scheduling and given the messages and the themes we wanted to strike, this seemed to be a good way to accomplish what we are trying to accomplish with the trip.”

In WHICH SENSE, precisely, are they “all over this process?” If they were all over it, they’d have produced results. Abbas complained bitterly a few days ago that no progress has been made, while Israel has announced new building plans around East Jerusalem. It is a truth almost universally accepted that these negotiations are on a slow boat to nowhere. But then I haven’t told you anything you didn’t already know. It’s just more of the same old Bush lies and wish-fulfilling fantasy-delusion.

So happy 60th Israel, our clown prince is on the way to join you in celebrating while the Titanic (that is, the peace process) lists heavily to starboard taking on water.

tags , , ,

Comments (16)

State Department Raps Gillerman’s Knuckles

Israeli UN ambassador Dan Gillerman has brewed a mini-tempest in a teacup by taking the highly undiplomatic step of smearing the good name of a former U.S. president. I say “mini-tempest” not because Gillerman’s breach isn’t serious–it is very serious. Rather, I say this because Condi Rice doesn’t really care much that Gillerman had a hissy fit against Carter. I’ll bet privately she even approves at least somewhat of Gillerman’s attack. But for the purpose of protocol and diplomatic precedent she’s got to pretend to take umbrage at Gillerman’s backalley brawling tactics.

In addition to saying that Carter had “blood on his hands” for meeting Khaled Meshal, Gillerman also called Carter (keep in mind this is the only U.S. president to actually negotiate a peace treaty between Israel and one of its Arab enemies) an “enemy of Israel.”

The United States registered an official protest with Israel against its ambassador to the United Nations, Dan Gillerman, for calling former U.S. President Jimmy Carter an “enemy of Israel” prior to Carter’s recent visit to the region.

A senior Foreign Ministry source said Saturday that the U.S. Embassy in Tel Aviv asked that Gillerman be made aware of the U.S. administration’s dissatisfaction with the disrespectful comments about the former U.S. President.

In addition, the State Department is planning to issue a public statement condemning comments made by Gillerman at a press conference in New York on Thursday, where he called Carter a “bigot.”

In my last post on this incident, I expressed the hope that Gillerman had gone “off the reservation” rather than that he was expressing the official position of the Israeli government regarding Carter. It appears the former explanation may be what happened. If that is the case, then the attack is no less disturbing as it means that Gillerman was making policy on his own in direct contravention of directives from his superiors–that is, Livni herself:

The same [foreign ministry] source said that Gillerman’s attack on Carter “surprised and embarrassed” Jerusalem, which contravened direct instructions from Livni to avoid comments on the former president.

Gillerman is scheduled to leave his post in several months. I wonder whether Livni will call him home early or leave him in place. I also wonder whether Gillerman, knowing full well that his incendiary remarks couldn’t hurt him this late in his UN tenure, is angling, like many of his predecessors, for a political career in the Likud. If that is the case, the Carter smear may be a transparent tactic to curry favor with the Bibi crowd.

Either way, an Israeli diplomat has just mugged a former U.S. president. It shouldn’t be allowed to happen. Gillerman is a two-bit political thug. Carter is a Nobel laureate.

tags , , ,

Comments (9)

Israel: Making a Hero of Ismail Haniya

How do you make a hero of someone you hate? Well, if you’re Israel you do pretty much all the things they’ve been doing unsuccessfully to extirpate Hamas and the terrorist threat from Gaza. Haaretz reports a Palestinian poll of West Bank and Gaza residents that finds that the popularity of Ismail Haniya and Hamas has risen dramatically since Israel attacked Gaza several weeks ago and killed 130 Palestinians:

Israel Defense Forces attacks in the Hamas-controlled Gaza Strip have boosted the popularity of the Islamist group’s leader Ismail Haniyeh among Palestinians in that territory and in the West Bank, according to a poll released Monday.

The survey by the West Bank-based Palestinian Center for Policy and Survey Research showed that if new presidential elections were held, Haniyeh would receive 47 percent of the vote compared with 46 percent for President Mahmoud Abbas of the rival Fatah faction. The figures represented a sharp strengthening of Haniyeh’s popularity. He served as prime minister in the Hamas-led government Abbas dismissed after Hamas seized the Gaza Strip from Fatah in June.

But the survey also found that Fatah leader Marwan Barghouti, imprisoned in Israel and seen as a possible Abbas successor, would defeat Haniyeh by a clear margin. The poll gave him 57 percent of the vote, compared to Haniyeh’s 38 percent.

The center’s previous poll, in December, gave Gaza-based Haniyeh just 37 percent of a potential presidential vote compared with 56 percent for Abbas, whose peace efforts with Israel are opposed by Hamas.

The survey also noted that overall support for Fatah had declined and support for Hamas had risen slightly during this period:

The survey found that if new parliamentary elections were to take place, Hamas would receive 35 percent of the vote and Fatah 42 percent, compared to 46 percent for Fatah and 34 percent for Hamas in an opinion poll in January.

So there you have it. Instead of pre-empting Hamas or persuading Palestinians that Hamas has nothing to offer it, Israeli policy has done just the opposite. And it has done this not just in Gaza, which one might expect as it is a Hamas stronghold, but in the West Bank as well. If Israel keeps it up and continues to radicalize the population, Hamas will not only control the West Bank along with Gaza, we might eventually have Hezbollah or even Al Qaeda ruling the roost there. Then Israel will look back nostalgically on the days when they actually might have had an opportunity to negotiate with a responsible party (at least compared with Al Qaeda or Hezbollah) like Hamas. Do I hear “Iraq” anyone and the failed U.S. policy against insurgents there?

tags , ,

Comments (5)

IDF: Stealing from the Mouths of Orphans

The readers of this blog who disagree with me and who seem to think that I relish criticizing Israel are wrong. I don’t relish bringing to your attention heart-rending stories like this one written by Gideon Levy. I wish I could bring you stories about a military attempting to use its power temperately, defensively, and wisely. Instead, you’ll read here tonight about an Israeli military which sees a threat in Palestinian charity and which steals food literally from the mouths of orphans. A military force which loots not from private homes or public offices, which would be bad enough, but from charities. Do you think I enjoy this? No. It breaks my heart as it may yours:

The ovens have been brought downstairs, into hiding. The two bagel and cake bakeries have already been closed by army order. The Israel Defense Forces confiscated the ovens in one of them, but the employees in the other bakery managed to rescue and hide theirs. The popular clothing shop Pretty Woman, in the heart of the bustling mall in Hebron, and its neighbor, Mama Care, the high-end shop for baby clothes, are about to close. The same is true of the new and spacious supermarket, the modern physical-therapy institute, the beauty salon, the barbershop and the library: Everything will be closed by order of the GOC Central Command. Local food and clothing warehouses were also emptied out by the IDF last week, with an inventory worth about NIS 750,000, designated for the impressive orphanages of the Islamic Charity Movement. The goods were loaded onto trucks and confiscated.

In the well-kept orphanage we visited this week, the hundreds of children were eating only majadera (a rice-and-lentil dish) and yogurt for lunch: There is no meat, no chicken, no fish; everything has been taken away. The gates of the movement’s new school, a handsome stone building designed for 1,200 pupils, have also been welded shut by the IDF.

The army has declared war on the Islamic Charity Movement in Hebron, in the context of the war against Hamas, the war against terror. After emptying the offices of the city’s money changers of cash reserves several weeks ago, the next strategic target is the private bakeries and shops in the city, whose owners happen to lease their places of business from the owner of the buildings: the Islamic Charity Movement.

How pathetic is an occupation army that empties out warehouses of food and clothing earmarked for orphans; how absurd is GOC Central Command Major General Gadi Shamni, who signs closure orders for beauty salons and clothing shops; how outrageous is the confiscation of industrial refrigerators in which food for children is kept; how cruel is a military regime that closes libraries used by young people; how ridiculous are the excuses that closing bakeries contributes to the war against terror; how foolish is the battle against dairies whose products are earmarked for these children; and how difficult is the situation of the Israeli occupation in the territories if it must resort to such contemptible activities in order to establish its status.

Ah, you’ll say–it’s because the Movement is run by Hamas. Right? Wrong:

The Islamic Charity Movement in Hebron was established in 1962, long before the birth of Hamas, shortly before the beginning of the Israeli occupation. Since then the organization has established a ramified network of educational and welfare institutions, and has acquired a great deal of real estate all over the city, with the declared aim of providing assistance to the needy - mainly to local orphans and the children of the poor. The legal adviser of the movement, attorney Abd al-Karim Farah, young and energetic in an elegant suit and a well-kempt beard, who does not hesitate to shake women’s hands and is now studying Hebrew at a local ulpan, says that in the early days of the occupation the Military Administration helped and encouraged the activity of the charitable movement. He himself is a product of its institutions.

Today the Islamic Charity Movement cares for 7,000 orphans and children in distress from Hebron and surrounding villages. There are 350 youngsters at its boarding schools and 1,200 pupils attending its three city schools; another six are in outlying towns. The children have lost one or both parents, or come from severely distressed homes. Only a small percentage are children of the fallen. The movement’s institutions employ 550 people, assisted by hundreds of volunteers. Their monthly budget is 400,000 Jordanian dinars, over NIS 2 million. Attorney Farah says everything is supervised by accountants and the Palestinian Authority’s welfare and education ministries. Also, the curricula in the movement’s educational institutions are identical to those of the PA, according to Farah, who emphasizes that “everything is legal.”

Most of its budget comes from donations from abroad - from Arab countries, and European and American agencies - but the charitable organization also has quite a number of independent sources of income: from buildings and modern commercial centers all over Hebron that it owns and leases to private tenants and businessmen, two bakeries, a sewing workshop and a dairy, whose products are used by the children in the institutions and are also for sale in the open market. The movement has a board of directors that is elected biannually and was headed by Dr. Adnan Maswadi, an ear, nose and throat specialist, who was recently released from detention in Israel and was forced to resign. About 30 additional employees are presently under arrest for belonging to the organization.

“I would like to emphasize,” says Farah, “that our movement has no official connection with Hamas. Perhaps some of our workers belong to Hamas, just as in other institutions such as the municipalities, but there is no formal connection. Nor are there transfers of money to Hamas, as Israel claims. Our financial reports are open and transparent. We are in no way the infrastructure of Hamas.

The IDF has declared war on orphans. And you wonder why the IDF couldn’t defeat Hezbollah during the last war. It’s too busy carting away computers from offices like this one to learn to fulfill its mission to actually defend the homeland. How it grieves me as a Zionist to read about such shameful behavior. But the next time Israel is forced to fight a war against Lebanon or Gaza or Iran and loses as it did in 2006 think back to this incident and you’ll begin to understand why.

For those who want to read it Levy has provided the IDF’s justification for this lunacy:

The IDF spokesman’s response: “During recent weeks forces of the IDF, the Shin Bet security services and the Civil Administration have been operating in order to strike at the institutions of the Islamic Charity Movement, which belongs to the Hamas terror organization and works to increase support for the organization, to disseminate its ideas, to find and enlist activists, and to transfer money for terrorist activity.

“Hamas activity is carried out under the civilian cover of support for the population and charity, but in fact the goal of the movement is to strengthen the power and control of the terror organization Hamas, as part of the expansion of terrorist activity against the State of Israel and its attempt to increase power in Judea and Samaria.

“In the context of the activities and protests of the Islamic Charity Movement in Hebron, the movement has transferred money to terror activists and their families, educated young people in the spirit of jihad, supported the families of shaheeds [martyrs] and prisoners, and worked to disseminate Hamas principles among the Palestinian population. By these acts the Hamas terror organization has exploited the Palestinian population and its weaker elements, in order to harness them to the terror network.

“In the context of the activity, the IDF operated against a number of economic assets of the Islamic Charity Movement in Hebron, and ordered their closure and the confiscation of some of their property. These assets constituted a source of income for the Hamas terror organization, which earned substantial sums of money from them for terrorist activity. The IDF will continue to adopt all the means at its disposal against the terror organizations and those who help them, and against Hamas in particular, in order to provide security to the inhabitants of the State of Israel.”

There you have it. Not a single shred of evidence. Show us a document or anything that authenticates the claim. Besides, how likely is it that the PA would allow a Hamas charity to operate unhindered in the heart of the West Bank given the enmity that exists between Fatah and Hamas?

The Islamic Charity Movement protests that its books are open and subject to scrutiny of the Palestinian Authority and prime minister Salaam Fayyad, well-known for his probity and honesty. It says it has nothing to do with Hamas and certainly doesn’t provide any funding for it. As the cheating husband said to his wife when caught in flagrante delecto: “Who are you gonna believe–me or your lying eyes?” The IDF has been caught red-handed and expects us to believe its unsupported charges.

If you’re the Israeli army and you intend to punish orphans about the only thing you can do to justify it that sounds half-way plausible is to accuse the charity of supporting terrorists. And some credulous Israelis and their supporters will believe it. The rest of us believe our “lyin’ eyes.”

Thanks to Rupa Shah for alerting me to this article.

tags , , ,

Comments

What’s Haaretz’s Rosner Have Against Obama?

israel factor obama screenshot
At this point, no one is much surprised by the right-wing skew of Shmuel Rosner’s coverage of Israeli politics as Haaretz’s Washington correspondent. But his Israel Factor campaign coverage hit a new low with this headline for today’s column. If you look inside at the column you’ll only be partially relieved to note that the panel Rosner appointed to rate the presidential candidates pro-Israel bona fides mostly dismisses the claim that Obama is pro-Palestinian. I say “mostly” because the score was 2.5 out of 5 meaning someone on the panel attributed at least some credibility to the charge.

But other questions about Obama rate disturbing responses. The panel only rated this statement 3.5:

There is a ‘constant virulent campaign’ against Obama regarding his position on Israel.

Here is how Rosner characterized the panel’s vote:

Six of the panelists believe this statement to be true, but not all of them strongly. Of the two who gave this statement a score of 1 or 2 - meaning they do not at all believe it - one of them believes Obama is overstating the degree to which there is such campaign. The other one told me that he found many of the allegations against Obama to have a kernel of truth in them.

To a statement that is patently true to any reasonable Jewish observer (and a story reported as credible by all the major Jewish media including Haaretz), two panelists don’t believe it at all and one of those (no doubt Dore Gold) actually believes the smear campaign. Some of the other six don’t believe strongly in the proposition that Obama is being smeared.

I think you’ve just heard everything you needed to know about how useful the Israel Factor is as a yardstick of anything serious related to juding the Israel policy of the various presidential campaigns.

tags , , ,

Comments (12)

Angry Pro-Israel Bloggers Wreak Vengeance Over Media Bias

Bad News Bears anti-Brit blog This Haaretz story takes the prize for ding-battiest pro-Israel wingnut project of the week, month and perhaps year. Let's say you're a pro-Israel blogger and you've really got a bee under your bonnet over alleged media bias against your favorite country. What do you do? Do you create a blog to defend Israel which rebuts the bias? Do you write letters to the editor pointing up Israel's good points? Well, those choices seemed too obvious for a group I'm calling the Bad News Bears bloggers. They hail from various countries but all share anger over their native country's media ...

Comments (6)

Haaretz’s ‘In Praise of Jewish Blogging’

I wanted to thank Haaretz for publishing in its English edition my first piece in that newspaper, In Praise of Jewish Blogging. It's a radically edited version of a piece I submitted which was way over their word limit. I've tried numerous times to elicit interest on the part of Haaretz editors in my work. But thanks to Ira Moskowitz, who suggested I contact the new managing editor, Charlotte Halle, it's finally happened. I've proposed writing precisely this article to numerous Jewish publications, none of whom were interested. It deals with what it's been like personally to write a Jewish political blog about the Israeli-Palestinian conflict over the past five years. And how, to my ...

Comments (43)

Obama: Gaza Siege ‘Forced on Israel’

Do you think Obama is thinking of all those elderly Jewish voters he has to face in Florida in a few weeks? And of his need to fend off a potential Clinton attack from his political right? Dear Ambassador Khalilzad, I understand that today the UN Security Council met regarding the situation in Gaza, and that a resolution or statement could be forthcoming from the Council in short order. I urge you to ensure that the Security Council issue no statement and pass no resolution on this matter that does not fully condemn the rocket assault Hamas has been conducting on civilians in southern Israel... All of us are concerned about the impact of closed border ...

Comments (12)

Gideon Levy: Olmert Needs New Governing Coalition for Peace

You couldn't find any greater "political dissident" than Gideon Levy in Israeli journalism. And even he has just come out in a Haaretz column saying that Ehud Olmert sincerely wants peace with the Palestinians: After listening to many of his statements, some of them very impressive, one comes to recognize that Ehud Olmert perhaps truly desires peace with the Palestinians. The fact that he has not zigzagged, not even once, that he only reiterates the same things, speaking like Uri Avnery (even if 40 years late), that he does not backtrack or stutter - only reinforces this feeling. It is permissible, therefore, to succumb to the temptation and believe that the man who told Haaretz on November 28, "two ...

Comments (4)

Yossi Sarid: ‘Israel Worried About Obama’

Haaretz features an interesting column by Yossi Sarid praising the U.S. primary system and elections. It's an unlikely perspective considering how bizarre and exhausting it must seem to most foreign observers. But there is one particular point of Sarid's essay--in which our primaries and the rise of Barack Obama encourage Sarid, because they provide for an injection of new political blood. Sarid, of course, is interested in Obama's early opposition to the Iraq war and parallels this with the sad fact that no Israeli politician had the guts or gumption to do the same with the Lebanon war: Nice things are happening now in America. While the election campaign is only just beginning and the fate ...

Comments (3)

« Previous entries