Muslim and Jewish Women in Nazareth

'We can live in peace'...John Lennon (photo: Dafna Tal)

Mahzor

Mahzor

New York Public Library

Churches

Sarajevo Haggadah

Mah Nishtanah

Sarajevo haggadah

Antaea Darom

Israeli women's art

Action

Torah as music

Ben Heine

Action

ceramic bowl

Mohammad Said Kalash, "Offering Reconciliation" exhibit (photo: Ilan Amihai)

Action

Punch and Judy/Pinchas and Jamila

Avi Katz

Action

David Grossman

Ben Heine

Action

Eldrige Street shul

Lower East Side

Action

Dove

Ben Heine

Action

Two birds

Hoda Jamal

Action

Israeli and Palestinian boys

from documentary, Promises

Action

Cat in the Hat

Yiddish version

Action

Daylight through the Wall

Banksy: graffiti art on Separation Wall

Action

Maurice Sendak's Brundibar set

New Victory Theater (photo: Nan Melville/NYT)

Action

Daniel Barenboim, West-Eastern Divan Orchestra

Palestinian-Israeli musical ensemble (photo: Kerstin Joensson/AP)

Action

Great Day on Eldrige Street

N.Y.'s klezmer greats celebrate shul rededication (photo: Leo Sorel)

Action

Joint Appeal for Peace

(Avi Katz)

Joint Appeal for Peace

Ketubah, Ancona, Italy (1772)

(Jewish Theological Seminary library)

Ancona ketubah

Posts Tagged ‘goldstone report’

Burston on Gaza War as Root of All Israeli Evil

Sunday, February 14th, 2010

Brad Burston, Haaretz’s columnist can be a helluva fine writer.  I’ve written at least one laudatory post about him.  After doing so, I read pieces by Burston which seemed almost to be written by a different person.  They were churlish pieces attacking Israel’s Jewish critics.  I chalked it up to a journalist feeling that it was his duty to show he could criticize both the right and left.  I thought I would never find a reason to write about his work again, till tonight.

Burston has written one of the most powerful, cogent and hard-hitting critiques–not only of the Gaza war, but of the current mess in which Israel finds itself in–I’ve ever read.  Seemingly every Israeli NGO or peace activist is under savage attack.  At the present moment, Israel faces a civil liberties crisis as dire as the U.S. faced during the McCarthy era.  The New Israel Fund, a classical Zionist NGO if there ever was one, is under mortal threat.  Its leader, Naomi Hazan has been publicly and graphically attacked in terms that would’ve made Goebbels proud.  Richard Goldstone has been called a traitor to his people.  Alan Dershowitz as much as put a price on his head.  Jewish women have been arrested for trying to leyn Torah at the Wall.

So it is like a balm in Gilead to read such graceful, soaring language from Burston:

This is about fear of the dark. Of the monstrous. In this case, the terror of finally uncovering what we ourselves are really made of.

This is about the lengths we will go, and the depths, in order to protect what we so desperately need to believe about ourselves. This is about how many others we will need to blame, vilify, assault, scapegoat and smear, before we actually take one wholly honest long look in the mirror.

This is about the war we made in Gaza, and what it did to Israel. This is about how Israel’s conduct of the war has done more damage to the Jewish state than all the thousands and thousands of Palestinian rockets and mortar shells put together. It has been a year and more since a truce was called in Gaza, and – thanks in no small part to Israel’s freely admitted policy of hamstringing and stonewalling UN investigators – the world is still at war with Israel.

The result is only now becoming felt. In a thousand ways, in new ways every single day, we have brought the war home.

Israel’s battle plan, which effectively called for bludgeoning Hamas and the whole of Gaza into a state of shock, had the further effect, intentional or not, of inducing shock in Israel itself.

Here Burston presents a daring thesis for an Israeli audience–that Goldstone was right:

In some cases, shock expresses itself in combativeness. A lashing out even at those who are trying to help.

In our state of shock, we were unable to see that Richard Goldstone was trying to save us. And that the Goldstone Report is exactly what Israel needs. We fought him every step of the way, convincing ourselves – just as in Gaza – that the unfolding catastrophe was the best of the available scenarios.

Had Israel cooperated with the panel, it might have begun to learn how to prevent another war like this one, and how to fight future wars entirely differently. Only now, with the shock beginning to subside, have Israeli military and legal officials begun publicly to concede that battling the Goldstone panel was a colossal blunder.

Burston here also propounds an unpopular idea in Israeli circles, that the Gaza siege is as much a blunder as the war itself was.  And this argument segues into the most important point of his column–that the war has led inexorably to the current attack on Israeli democracy and the peace movement:

And it is this Israeli government, in continuing its siege of Gaza, in denying Gazans access to concrete and other materials needed to rebuild homes destroyed by Israeli fire during Cast Lead, that lends further credence to the Goldstone Report’s suspicions that Israel’s policy has been and continues to be one of collective punishment of a civilian population.

Despite the nightmarish numbers of civilians killed in Gaza, the right has argued again and again that the problem with the war was that it was not pursued aggressively enough. Now, at home, they are getting their way. Finally, the war is being pressed to the full – with peace activists and human rights workers as the primary targets.

The Dahiya Doctrine of overkill and unimaginable, unremitting force, is being applied against the elements of Israeli society most strongly defending democracy and elemental rights. Finally, the war at home is being run the way the right wants. No holds barred. A fresh new onslaught on democracy every single day.

And if his thundering column had ended with the following passage I would’ve called it a masterwork of decency and humanity:

The Goldstone Report is, indeed, deeply flawed. But it is exactly what Israel needs. A deeply flawed report for a deeply flawed country. A country which will not, and cannot, begin to heal itself, repair itself, right itself, unless it faces with honesty and courage the issues and allegations raised by the report.

As long as Israel ducks the report, and keeps buried the whole truth about Cast Lead, it will not recover from this state of shock. Israel will be more vulnerable than ever to destruction from within.

But alas, he didn’t.  And this goes to my criticism of Burston, where he seems to lose the courage of his convictions and lapses into standard anti-Palestinian rhetoric:

Gaza, ruled by a Hamas which wants to see Israel exterminated – and which has only grown richer, better armed, and more popular as a result of the Israeli embargo – will continue to hold the whole of Israel in a crippling, withering, ultimately destructive state of siege.

The notion that Hamas wants Israel exterminated is a beloved trope of the very Israeli right Burston has spent this entire column deriding.  I have no problem with criticizing Hamas.  But if you want to do that you have a responsibility to do it accurately and precisely.  And this anti-Hamas slur is neither accurate nor fair.  But I do very much like Burston’s closing image of a Hamas which, by the very nature of Israel’s siege of Gaza, holds Israel under siege as well.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Israeli Rightists Blame New Israel Fund for War Crimes Charges Against Israeli Leaders

Monday, February 1st, 2010

Ehud Barak, Tzipi Livni and Gabi Ashkenazi featured in mock New Israel Fund jail (Issachar Roess)s

The incitement against the New Israel Fund just keeps coming.  Today, right-wing Im Tirzu activists demonstrated at the annual Hertzeliya conference (Israel’s equivalent of Davos).  They featured a prison cell with cut out figures of Tzipi Livni, Ehud Barak and Gabi Ashkenazi in striped prisoner uniforms.  The placard above them read: “New Israel Fund prisoners.”

It reminded me of an image I saw before Yitzhak Rabin’s assassination featuring a picture of him on a placard dressed in a kapo uniform.  This was the same type of hate and incitement that led to his murder.  I shudder to think what others are capable of in the same settler movement which produced Yigal Amir, Baruch Goldstein and Jack Teitel.  Teitel was the one who exploded a bomb outside Prof. Zeev Sternhell’s home which injured him.  Before this, Teitel had posted notices offering a reward for the death of Peace Now’s Yariv Oppenheimer.  How long before someone takes a potshot at Naomi Hazan or Oppenheimer?  And even more sadly, would many care if it hit its mark?  Well, of course they would care.  Until the glare of bad publicity wore off.  Then it would be back to business as usual.  The Occupation continues.  The land thefts continue.

Imagine, it is the very Shin Bet who fomented this incitement against NIF who are responsible for protecting its leaders from the settler crazies who would harm them.

All this is brought to you with the assistance of Christian Zionist zealot John Hagee and his $100,000 taxa-deductible donation to Im Tirtzu.

And the truth is that this rightist group is inadvertently revealing the harsh truth to Israel.  Its leaders are culpable for possible war crimes.  Im Tirtzu can attempt to pin the blame for this on NIF all they want.  But the blame lies in one place: those who prosecuted the war in Gaza.  This little stunt is a feeble attempt to blame the messenger.  NIF is speaking truth to power as any good NGO should in a liberal democracy.  Don’t blame NIF for Israel’s own behavior.  If Israel didn’t want to face this outcome it shouldn’t have conducted the war as it did.  Given that it did over the protestations of much of the international community whose outcry warned them that they’d overstepped the bounds of law and morality, they will have to face the bitter music.

Someone may go to jail and Israel will have only itself (and not the NIF) to blame if that happens.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Israeli Rightists Warn IDF Soldiers of Prison Time Thanks to New Israel Fund

Monday, February 1st, 2010

Some interesting developments today regarding the Im Tirtzu assault on the New Israel Fund.  Both Israeli and American Jewish peace groups came out swinging today in this article in the Jerusalem Post.  I’m astonished after being savaged by three prior separate Post articles (including one last week by Dershowitz) to read a respectful characterization there of my views:

The American Jewish blogosphere was also alive with comment and criticism on Monday, with well-known writers such as J.J. Goldberg, editorial director of The Forward, [and] Richard Silverstein chiming in on the Im Tirtzu report and coming to the NIF’s defense.

“I do not have a problem with anyone, whether Right or Left, expressing their views on the issues,” Silverstein wrote on his blog “Tikun Olam.”

“It is good to criticize Goldstone or New Israel Fund if you feel they’ve got things wrong. But it is dead wrong to call your opponent ‘evil’ or use Der Sturmer tactics to turn your opponent into a subhuman,” he continued, referring to the full-page caricature of Chazan.“

The Facebook Im Tirtzu is Fascist page is here.  Thanks to Americans for Peace Now and J Street for releasing strong statements of support for NIF and Prof. Hazan.

There has been one little noticed feature of the Im Tirtzu campaign, which is this ad in the Hebrew language press.  It features a “prison calculator” at the top which states:

Served in Operation Cast Lead?

Calculate how much [time] you’ll do.  It’s important how you answer–the prison calculator will aid you in determining how many years imprisonment you have coming to you:

In which branch did you serve?

How many days?

At what rank?

How many Israeli did you save from rockets?

This is meant by Im Tirtzu to be the equivalent of a wake up call for their supporters in the IDF, but think of what this really means.  They’re really runnin’ scared.  They really believe the ICC may end up getting them.  Frankly, I never thought this movement could get this far in impacting Israeli consciousness.  But it has.  And we must not let up.  Leaders must be held accountable either in Israel or New York or The Hague.

Let’s not forget that the good Pastor John Hagee is supporting this poison to the tune of $100,000 this year.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Israel, in Concession to Goldstone, Disciplines 2 Senior IDF Officers for ‘Endangering Human Life’

Monday, February 1st, 2010

Brig. Gen. Eyal Eisenberg (Roee Edan)

I don’t know whether this is a case of throwing a piece of meat to howling dogs to get them off your scent or whether this is a meaningful admission by Israel (or both), but I find this story potentially quite important:

An Israel Defense Forces brigadier general and another officer with the rank of colonel endangered human life during last year’s military campaign in the Gaza Strip by firing white phosphorous munitions in the direction of a compound run by UNRWA, the United Nations Relief and Works Agency, the Israeli government says.

The finding aknowledges [sic], at least in part, allegations by international organizations. It was contained in a report that the government provided to the United Nations over the weekend in response to last September’s Goldstone Commission report.

Gaza Division Commander Brig. Gen. Eyal Eisenberg and Givati Brigade Commander Col. Ilan Malka, were the subject of disciplinary action by GOC Southern Command Maj. Gen. Yoav Gallant after headquarters staff found that the men exceeded their authority in approving the use of phosphorus shells that endangered human life, the Israeli government report said.

Col. Ilan Malka (Dudu Azoulay)

The incident in question occurred on January 15 of last year, two days before the end of Operation Cast Lead, in the southern Gaza City neighborhood of Tel al-Hawa, at a time when the Givati brigade and other Israeli forces were in the area.

…The munitions disperse hundreds of pieces of felt impregnated with phosphorus and at least some of the pieces fell into the UNRWA compound, causing injury to an UNRWA employee there as well as to two Palestinian civilians who took cover at the location.

UNWRA compound shelled during Cast Lead (AFP)

A few interesting observations: first, Ynetnews adds that hundreds of Gaza civilians were sheltering in the UNWRA compound when it was shelled, which means they all could’ve been burned alive.  Second, the facility shelled contained most of the food used to feed Gazans, which also easily could’ve gone up in smoke.  Third, endangering human life appears to be the IDF equivalent term for “war crimes,” though you’ll notice that the officers were “reprimanded” for their actions. A reprimand seems quite a lenient judgment for the use of white phosphorus.  Fourth, this was the incident which led Israel to pay the UN $10.5 million for damages to the facility.  Fifth, nice to see that the IDF acknowledges that Palestinians are “human” life (as in “endangering human life”).

It goes without saying that both the IDF and Israeli government will use this incident to prove that they are policing their own and that IDF internal investigations are sufficient to satisfy the demands of Goldstone. This simply won’t do and the Israelis have got to know this. And it’s in this sense that possibly these two officers are sacrificial lambs thrown to the UN in order to try to save Israel from the worse fate of being hauled before the ICC.

What is interesting about this finding and what must frighten IDF senior command and Israeli politicians is that the admission of “endangering human life” may be a first creeping step toward the admission of war crimes if the uproar over Goldstone doesn’t let up and Israel feels forced to make further concessions/admissions. Given this, it is no accident that Israel’s foremost Doberman Dershowitz has been on the prowl calling Justice Goldstone a “traitor to the Jewish people” and an “evil, evil man.”

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Dershowitz Calls Goldstone ‘Evil,’ ‘Traitor to Jews;’ Shin Bet Urges NIF Investigation

Sunday, January 31st, 2010

Israeli far-right goes 'Der Shturmer' on Naomi Hazan in Jerusalem Post ad.

I’ve never felt this more than tonight.  There is deep evil afoot among elements of the IDF, Shin Bet, and in the halls of hasbara represented by Alan Dershowitz and the like.  Much of it revolves around the hysterical reaction by the Israeli military and political elite to the Goldstone Report.  We knew all this before.  But the attacks have never been so vicious as those of the past few days, bordering on incitement to violence.  The phrases being voiced remind me of the environment just before Yitzchak Rabin was assassinated by the same type of rabid Israeli nationalist as the ones calling for blood from Israeli peace activists.  I know many of us have been critical of the Israeli left and the peace movement.  I remain so.  But it is now time to pick whichever portion of the Israeli left we can most support and do so wholeheartedly.  The Israeli left is under attack as never before.

Two developments in particular have chilled me to the bone, and I thank Jerry Haber for posting about Dershowitz’s latest eruption and Didi Remez for posting about the IDF’s machinations against Prof. Naomi Hazan and New Israel Fund.  And I urge you after reading this to do everything in your power to support the forces under assault.  Make contributions to New Israel Fund.  Send messages of support to Prof. Hazan.  Call your local Israeli consulate to complain about the assaults on her and Justice Goldstone.  This must stop.

I do not have a problem with anyone whether right or left expressing their views on the issues.  It is good to criticize Goldstone or New Israel Fund if you feel they’ve got things wrong.  But it is dead wrong to call your opponent “evil” or use Der Sturmer tactics to turn your opponent into a subhuman (note the rhino horn on Prof. Hazan’s head in the graphic I’ve posted here–the Hebrew word for “Fund” is the same as “horn,” which explains the rather foolish-looking horn on her head).

We MUST turn the conversation away from this assault and back on the substance of the Goldstone Report.  We must support the UN process outlined in Goldstone which could bring the report for consideration by the Security Council and International Court of Justice if the Israelis and Hamas refuse to investigate their misdeeds.  This is where attention needs to be.  And not on accusations of treason and other McCarthyite red herrings.

Please spend time reading the articles linked here and listening to the Dershowitz radio interview and disseminate this as widely as possible with the added message that we will not take our eyes off the ball that is Goldstone.  We will stand by our allies in Israel and outside it when they are under attack.

Alan Dershowitz gave a radio interview to Israeli army radio, Galey Tzahal, in which he launched a full frontal attack on Justice Goldstone.  Keep in mind that the Israeli officials discussing whether and how to create the least effective investigative panel that would satisfy the Goldstone conditions have bandied about the name of this thug as a potential member of the panel.  Here are some of the interview’s key passages:

D: The Goldstone Report is a defamation written by an evil, evil man.  Goldstone is an evil man.  No one should mince words about it.  He allowed his Jewishness, the fact that his name is Goldstone, and that he has connections to Israel–he allowed himself to be used to give…a heksher, a certification of purity to a defamation.

It would be as if the Czar when he wrote the Protocols of the Elders of Zion he asked a prominent to Jew to edit the report and sign the Protocols in order to show that it had credibility.

Galey Tzahal: Do you hint Prof. Dershowitz that he is a moser, someone who betrays his own people?

D: Absolutely.  There is a prayer that is said every day for people like him: La-malshinim al t’hi tikvah (“there shall be no hope for the betrayers”).  He is a man who uses his language, his words against the Jewish people.  I regarded him as a friend.  I now regard his as an absolute traitor.

Eyal Nir, on my Facebook page makes a perceptive comment (Hebrew) about the Protocols: either Dershowitz is claiming that the Protocols were based on true testimony or he’s claiming that Goldstone is the same type of fraud as the Protocols.  Perhaps Dersh wants us the believe Cast Lead never happened or all those Gazan civilians didn’t die?  Can anyone doubt this man is a charlatan?

Later in the interview Dershowitz says he hasn’t been asked to serve on the committee.  With mock modesty he ventured Justice Aharon Barak as a better candidate for the panel.  Jerry Haber points out that when the Goldstone Report was first issued Defense Minister Barak approached Dershowitz and Barak to spearhead the campaign in Israel’s defense.  You can see what Dersh’s reply was.  Barak refused.  And given this performance, how likely does anyone think it will be for Aharon Barak to answer this tainted call to serve?

If you understand Hebrew, also listen to the remainder of the interview with Shulamit Aloni who savages Dershowitz, calling him a “patriot nutcase” and Ehud Barak, saying she believes he deliberately wanted to kill Gaza civilians during Cast Lead.  She also calls him “the most dangerous man in Israel” and a “Napoleon” (which is rendered even funnier by the fact that Barak is quite short).

Didi Remez translates part of the story by Maariv’s Ben Caspit which reveals that the Knesset’s foreign affairs and security committee will deliberate about New Israel Fund’s alleged role in collaborating with the Goldstone Report by passing incriminating IDF documents to it, thereby blackening Israel’s name in the process.  These documents were forwarded to the Attorney General by the Shin Bet, requesting an investigation be launched.

In an earlier story on the affair, Caspit writes this incendiary claptrap about NIF (as reported in Noam Sheizaf’s blog post):

“Israel’s image is at an all-times low. International pressure is mounting, and with it the calls for boycott. All this was fueled by the Goldstone report, which was in itself fueled by Israeli sources. The funding for these sources is provided by, amongst others, the NIF. The question is whether the New Israeli Fund is indeed for Israel.”

Caspit mentions 300 grassroots and social organizations receiving funds through the NIF, and asks: “is all this activity just intended to serve as a front for radical subversive activity, acting against the very foundations of the state?”

Other Knesset members are proposing ending cooperation between all government agencies and NIF grantees (NIF funds various social justice, human rights and anti-poverty NGOs and initiatives in Israeli Jewish and Arab communities).

Far-right Israeli nationalists protest outside Naomi Hazan's home. Placards say: "Love Naomi--Hate Tzahal" (Flash 90)

The far-right nationalist group, Im Tirtzu, is campaigning against NIF and Naomi Hazan, its Israeli chair, placing the ad displayed here in the Jerusalem Post.  The Israeli right have demonstrated outside Hazan’s home dressed in in mock Hamas kefiyes and thanking her for her support.

Here are some of the shenanigans the Israeli right and intelligence services have planned for NIF:

..The materials exposed…are familiar to the IDF authorities and the legal authorities in Israel. Some of them were given half a year ago to the Military Advocate General Brig. Gen. Avichai Mandelblit.He checked the material and gave it to the Atty. Gen., with a recommendation to open an official investigation. No such investigation has been made so far. The Shin Bet is also familiar with the material and the sensitive issue. Taking action against this is not simple because NIF is a registered association in the US. Also, it is noteworthy that a large part of the fund’s activities in Israel are devoted to social and public issues of the first order.

“It will be hard to connect this activity to political subversion,” said a security source, who is well familiar with the affair. “But on the other hand, there is clearly a worrisome pattern here that is causing Israel serious damage and helping its worst critics tie the IDF’s hands and undermine the legitimacy of the Jewish state in general and its right to defend itself in particular.”

Im Tirtzu is now planning to launch a large public campaign, both against the New Israel Fund in general and personally against its head, Prof. Naomi Hazan. Dozens of movement activists demonstrated last night in front of Hazan’s house dressed up as Hamas activists and carried signs thanking Hazan and the fund.

For the past few months and until tonight, I’d broken off contact and support for NIF over the treatment of fellow blogger, Shamai Leibowitz several years ago.  Since Ben Caspit played an instrumental role in this affair as a conduit of the Shin Bet in smearing Shamai, it’s appropriate to bring it up now.  Shamai came to the U.S. to study international human rights and receive a law degree from George Washington University.  He came with the support of an NIF fellowship.  Leibowitz taught a State Department language, culture and politics course for new U.S. diplomats being sent to Israel.  That is, he taught the course until Aipac found out about it and conveyed this information to the Israeli government, which in turn leaked the information to Caspit, who published it as a juicy piece of gossip: defender of convicted terrorist Marwan Barghouti teaching U.S. diplomats about Israeli culture.  You get the drift.  Shamai lost the job.

Later, Shamai made a speech endorsing the BDS movement in Cambridge which was also reported back to the powers that be in Israel.  Such pressure was exerted that NIF dropped Shamai from the program.  When I learned of this I was so angry I wrote to the then NIF director, Larry Garber, berating him for his betrayal of Shamai.  He never responded.  That’s when I cut my ties to NIF.

But as far as I’m concerned, the Israeli power structure is out to castrate NIF and I simply won’t allow it to happen.  It’s all hands on deck.  Do not let this ship go down.

Those of you who follow the Israeli media closely should note the role that Ben Caspit is playing in this little escapade.  Some journalists’ interests are so closely allied with the security services their salaries might as well be paid by them.  Caspit is one such.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

The Beat Goes On: Dershowitz Slanders Me in Jerusalem Post Too, Ghouls Rejoice

Sunday, January 31st, 2010

Recently, I wrote that Alan Dershowitz had published a Huffington Post blog in which he named and quoted from my blog post, The Zionization of Disaster Relief, about Israel’s PR extravaganza in Haiti.  Instead of attributing the blog post to me, the author, and linking to this blog, instead he wrote the following:

The neo-Nazi Web site ReportersNotebook.com features a blog entitled The Zionization of Disaster Relief.

The editors of Huffington Post, after saying they would address the issue, have not yet done so.  Now I discover that Dersh also published this same post on the same date, January 24th, in his Jerusalem Post blog.  I’ve also written to the Post’s editors asking them to correct the record.

Given that I’ve attacked Alan Dershowitz before here, it can be no accident why he formulated his paragraph about my blog post in the fraudulent manner he did.  And now comes circumstantial evidence that this is the case.   An anti-Semitism-obsessed, anti-jihadi, pro-Israel blogger, Adam Holland, has taken up the cudgels.  Holland is also one of Joe Weissman’s buddies, who I’ve also criticized for his jihad against Anglican cleric Stephen Sizer.

Strangely enough, Holland also actually blogs at Daily Kos.  I wonder what credentials got him that gig?  Is being a pro-Israel, Muslim hater sufficient now to get oneself a diary at DK (apologies to a few of my good blogging friends who are DK diarists)?  This is beginning to look like pro-Israel tag team wrestling.  You bad mouth one of theirs and they’ll double team you with some of their big, fat sweaty hack heavyweights.

I’m not even going to get into how badly Holland mischaracterizes my views in the Haiti post I wrote.  More interesting to me is the McCarthyite guilt by association rhetorical style of demagogue-goons like Holland (and Weissman, Horowitz, Pipes and others):

Silverstein’s column has traversed the left-right wormhole and has been published by the neo-Nazi blogger (and David Irving associate) Michael Santomauro at his Reporters Notebook website (read here). Alan Dershowitz read this reposted version of Silverstein’s column and blasted it in a column of his own…Silverstein’s column has also been reposted on Russia’s Pravda English language forum and the Arab website Uruknet.

My work is republished (without my knowledge or permission, but that’s neither here nor there) by a Holocaust revisionist, the discussion forum of a Russian newspaper, and an Arab website–and that makes me…what?  A known associate of organized revisionism, the Russians, and jihadists?

This may satisfy those of little brain among the pro-Israel-obsessed blog world.  They don’t seem to be able to debate honestly or characterize accurately what you write, so they resort to these fraudulent intellectual stunts.  The Who once sang: “We won’t be fooled again.”  Unlike their song, I don’t think anyone is fooled by this narischkeit.

To me, this indicates a deep unease about Israel’s perilous position on the world stage as the Goldstone Report begins to reoccupy headlines and Israel refuses to appoint the investigative commission demanded by the UN panel.  The government has launched a vicious counter-attack against Israeli and international human rights NGOs, Israeli and Palestinian peace activists, the Report itself, and progressive bloggers who attest to the inadequacy of Israel’s response.  The attack is also coordinated along with internet activists recruited by the Foreign Ministry.  Dershowitz and buddies of his like Weissman and Holland also play a useful role.  I call it the vast right-wing hasbara conspiracy-crusade.

Dershowitz and Holland attacked my post because it revealed that the clothes the Haiti hasbara emperor were wearing were hiding the sins of Gaza.  Interesting who they haven’t attacked though–the Israeli doctor (and IDF Lt. Col.) whose newspaper article formed the basis for my article.  My post is 85% Dr. Yoel Donchin’s article from the Israeli press with 15% commentary written by me.  But it would be much harder to target an experienced medicine specialist from Israel’s Hadassah Hospital as being anti-Israel or loony-left than me (though it won’t succeed with me either).

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

IDF Refuses Gaza War Crimes Investigation: Time for ICC Referral

Saturday, January 30th, 2010

Ashkenazi and Barak: Investigation? We don't want your stinking investigation (Nir Kafri)

Both Israel and Hamas have essentially refused to comply with conditions laid down in the Goldstone Report, which called for a serious investigation by each party of the charges of crimes against civilians during the Gaza war.  Justice Goldstone gave each side three months to reply to this condition and that deadline came Friday.  Each party’s reply was feeble, but Israel’s more feeble since it killed considerably more.

Hamas apologized for the three Israeli civilians it killed and said their death was a “mistake.”  Were it not for an even more feeble Israeli response, Hamas’ would’ve earned the derision it deserved.  But Israel’s was classic and all over the place.  In one government leak, it’s claimed Bibi is willing to appoint an investigative panel that would be enfeebled even before it began; with no subpoena power and extremely limited mandate.  One panel member’s name suggested: Alan Dershowitz!  Now comes word that the IDF itself refuses an external investigation:

…The defense establishment appears to be steadfast in its refusal to have the IDF’s monopoly over examination of its actions challenged.

…Senior Jerusalem officials warned that Israel’s response to the UN will not satisfy the international community and that eventually an examination committee that is outside the IDF will have to be appointed to investigate last year’s military operation in the Gaza Strip.

Senior officials in the Prime Minister’s Bureau say that Netanyahu is inclined to accept the justice and foreign ministries’ call for an additional examination, by an extra-military body, into cases in which innocent civilians were harmed during Operation Cast Lead. Netanyahu is convinced that only an independent probe will convince the international community that Israel is serious in its investigation of alleged violations of the law of war.

Actually, this is laughable because the version of an “independent” probe I outlined above will satisfy no one outside the Israeli government, nor should it.

Here’s why:

“To date,” the Israeli report [to the UN defending Operation Cast Lead states, "the IDF has launched investigations into 150 separate incidents arising from the Gaza Operation. Of the 150 incidents, so far 36 have been referred for criminal investigation.

So with 1,100 Gaza civilians killed, the IDF investigated a total of 150 incidents and found only 36 even worthy of a fuller investigation.  Now, we all know the history of the IDF in investigating itself.  If there is any way it can exonerate itself (and there virtually always is unless the heat is on from international sources) it will.  So you can be sure that of the 36 perhaps one, if you're lucky, might result in any punishment at all.  In fact, the only known discipline I've heard of meted out so far to any IDF soldier for acts committed during Cast Lead was a soldier reprimanded for stealing a Gazan credit card.  1,100 civilians killed and all they could find worth punishing was theft of a crummy credit card!  Really, they must be joking.

So I propose that Ban Ki Moon refer the matter to the Security Council, part of the process Goldstone requested prior to asking the International Criminal Court to take up the case in the event the parties do not investigate their own excesses.  One thing's for sure: as soon as mentions Goldstone and ICC in the same sentence, Bibi will announce with a flourish an "independent" Israeli investigation.  It will, of course be toothless, fragmented and ineffectual.  And here is where the world community will be tested.  Will it be satisfied by yet another Israeli charade; or will it call Israel's bluff and take matters further?  Will Security Council members like the U.S. even let anything close to this happen?  Likely they will not.  But my hope is that Pres. Obama will find some way to exert pressure on Israel whether or not he ends up vetoing such a resolution.

Those of you who follow the State of the Union will note that Pres. Obama ignored the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, meaning it's likely he jettisoned it from his current political agenda (along with health care if you can believe the headlines of the NY Times).  This doesn't bode well for the Goldstone Report's future.  But I still remain hopeful that this document will have staying power and continue to rankle Israel (and to a lesser extent Hamas) until they grapple with it in a serious way.

FAIR Questions Bronner’s Objectivity

Thursday, January 28th, 2010

The progressive media watchdog group, FAIR, has published a statement joining Electronic Intifada and Tikun Olam in questioning the stonewalling approach the NY Times has taken to the issue of whether Ethan Bronner’s son’s induction into the IDF raises questions about his objectivity and conflict of interest:

What the Times needs to ask itself is whether it expects that its bureau chief has the normal human feelings about matters of life or death concerning one’s child.

Might he feel hostility, for example, when interviewing members of organizations who were trying to kill his son? When the IDF goes into battle, might he be rooting for the side for which his son is risking his life? Certainly such issues would be taken very seriously if a Times reporter had a child who belonged to a military force that was engaged in hostilities with the IDF; indeed, there’s little doubt that a reporter in that position would not be allowed to continue to cover the Mideast conflict.

Having a conflict of interest, it should be stressed, is not the same thing as producing slanted journalism; rather, it means that a journalist has outside motivations that are strongly at odds with his or her journalistic responsibilities. That a journalist has been “scrupulously fair” in the past does not excuse an ongoing conflict of interest; journalists should not be placed in a position where they have to ignore the well-being of their family in order to do their job, nor should readers be expected to trust that they can do so.

FAIR goes on to note that Bronner’s reporting has certainly not been known to be “scrupulously fair” in the past, which strengthens the level of concern among progressive readers of the Times.  I wrote here that Bronner’s last report on a new IDF offensive against the Goldstone Report claims that “virtually all Israelis” and even human rights NGOs agree there was no wholesale attack on civilian infrastructure in Gaza as Goldstone claims.  This is a patently false statement and has no right being in a newspaper claiming to represent a neutral perspective on this issue.

Please take FAIR’s advice and write or call Clark Hoyt, the Times’ public editor.  If he covers this at all publicly, he’ll doubtless side with Bronner and his editors, but it’s still worth trying to keep ‘em honest:

CONTACT:
New York Times
Clark Hoyt, Public Editor
public@nytimes.com
Phone: 212-556-7652

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]