Mahzor

New York Public Library

Churches

Sarajevo Haggadah

Mah Nishtanah

Sarajevo haggadah

Antaea Darom

Israeli women's art

Action

Torah as music

Ben Heine

Action

ceramic bowl

Mohammad Said Kalash, "Offering Reconciliation" exhibit (photo: Ilan Amihai)

Action

Punch and Judy/Pinchas and Jamila

Avi Katz

Action

David Grossman

Ben Heine

Action

Eldrige Street shul

Lower East Side

Action

Dove

Ben Heine

Action

Two birds

Hoda Jamal

Action

Israeli and Palestinian boys

from documentary, Promises

Action

Cat in the Hat

Yiddish version

Action

Daylight through the Wall

Banksy: graffiti art on Separation Wall

Action

Maurice Sendak's Brundibar set

New Victory Theater (photo: Nan Melville/NYT)

Action

Daniel Barenboim, West-Eastern Divan Orchestra

Palestinian-Israeli musical ensemble (photo: Kerstin Joensson/AP)

Action

Great Day on Eldrige Street

N.Y.'s klezmer greats celebrate shul rededication (photo: Leo Sorel)

Action

Joint Appeal for Peace

(Avi Katz)

Joint Appeal for Peace

Ketubah, Ancona, Italy (1772)

(Jewish Theological Seminary library)

Ancona ketubah

Posts Tagged ‘gideon-levy’

Beit Hanun Massacre Survivors ‘Beg God Not to Harm Muslim or Jew’

Saturday, November 18th, 2006
islam al-atamna beit hanun massacre survivorIslam Al-Atamna, 14 year old Beit Hanun survivor (credit: Miki Kratsman)

Gideon Levy has one of his usual heartbreaking profiles in Haaretz about the remaining survivors of the Beit Hanun massacre. I know I’m repeating myself, but it simply breaks the heart to read prose like this:

This is Islam al-Atamna. A girl of 14. She is sitting in her black mourning clothes. Eight close relatives – including her mother, grandparents, uncles and aunts – were all killed before her eyes, one after the other. They were killed in the street after they awoke at home in horror at the sound of the first shell that exploded and then fled outdoors, where the next shells caught them. About 11 fell on a residential neighborhood, one shell a minute, a rain of death, pursuing them in their flight. Fatherless for some time already, the girl is left alone in the world with her two little sisters and her 3-year-old brother Abdullah, whose legs were severed and who is hospitalized in the Al-Hilal Hospital in Gaza.

What should we say to Islam? What can we say to Islam? That the chip in the radar system is to blame? That the electronic component is responsible? Perhaps that the Palestinians are to blame?

Since the accident the girl has not fallen asleep for even a moment, which one can see in her frozen face. Islam is now a girl in shock, whose entire world was destroyed last Wednesday morning, with a total of 22 relatives dead and dozens wounded.

Levy continues Lamentations-like with his dirge of death:

Now the survivors are sitting in the street of death, all of whose fatalities are members of one family, the Al-Atamna family. There has never before been such killing, of 22 members of one family, not even under direct Israeli occupation.

In the hospitals in Gaza, Egypt and Israel the wounded, about 40 in number, are moaning, many of them with amputated limbs and head injuries, quite a number of them children. The dead also include children, and mainly women: The mass poster that was printed presents the portraits of the men and the children who were killed, whereas the pictures of the women are replaced by paintings of red roses, as is the custom.

Flowers and children. A boy in a suit, a tie and glasses, Saad, 9 years old at his death; a boy in sunglasses, Mohammed, 11 years old; and a boy without glasses, Mahdi, 13. And there are the little ones: 3-year-old Maram and 8-month-old Maisa. All victims. Mothers and their children, grandfathers and their granddaughters, brothers and sisters, one after another, one shell after another. The IDF regrets …

Here Levy describes the scene of devastation at one of the apartment houses which was shelled:

On the fourth floor, in the apartment of the family of Amjad Al-Atamna, where two shells fell on two children’s rooms, tearing not-very-large holes in their ceilings, signs of the killing are still in evidence. The children were crushed here to pieces by the shells that landed on their heads while they were sleeping the peaceful sleep of little children. The Arabic notebook of Khalil Al-Atamna, wrapped in a cover with colorful cartoons, is among the ruins. Kahlil is hospitalized in serious condition. A third shell hit the wall of the stairwell, killing a mother and her two daughters while they were fleeing. The three were catapulted from the stairwell into the street.

Levy closes his requiem with a plea for the end of violence from one of the survivors who speaks of the orphaned Islam Al-Atamna:

Taxi driver Raad Al-Atamna, a member of the family and an old acquaintance of ours from the Erez checkpoint: “Her uncle was also killed, and another uncle is in a hospital in Egypt. Now she has nobody. What can I tell you, only God will look after her and help her. Gideon, I’m begging God not to harm either a Muslim or a Jew – no person should be harmed like us. It’s a tragedy, a Holocaust such as we have not had since 1956. I hope that what happened to us doesn’t happen to anyone else in the world.”

One of my rightist pro-Israel commenters today said that he feels “deep empathy” for the Beit Hanun dead, but that they have only themselves to blame” for bringing to power a party, Hamas, which wishes to make war on Israel. As if being blown to bits in your bed has anything whatsoever to do with who you voted for in an election. Such obtuse notions are an abomination in the face of testimony such as Raad Al-Atamna’s. Have these Palestine haters no shame?

The IDF has “apologized.” As if this somehow makes a difference or even matters. Israel is providing medical care for the survivors. But tell us, oh dear IDF, how will Islam Al-Atamna care for a 3 year old brother who is a double amputee?? Will you provide these survivors with lifetime welfare to ensure that they can maintain some small measure of dignity in the remainder of their lives? Of course not. As soon as the cameras go away, Israeli attentiveness, such as it is, will turn off like a spigot.

Levy reports that another survivor died of his wounds a week ago, bringing the death toll now to 19:

The pervasive atmosphere in the town is gloomy. The mourners’ tents are already empty, and the plastic chairs have been piled up, until the next time there is mourning. The mourners are only sitting now for Bassam Al-Atamna, Bassam who died late. He died of his wounds last Friday at Ichilov Hospital in Tel Aviv, after efforts to save him failed.

Gideon Levy on Gaza’s Suffering

Saturday, September 9th, 2006
al-zakh family in mourningAl-Zakh family at home with photo of Mohammed on wall (Haaretz)

Haaretz’s Gideon Levy continues his recent series documenting the suffering inflicted on Gaza civilians by the IDF’s ongoing invasion there. Today’s harrowing story depicts a week-long concentrated attack on the Gaza neighborhood of Saja’iya, during which 22 civilians died, five of whom were children. One of them, Mohammed Al-Zakh, was blasted by two tank shells which severed his body in two:

Mohammed was buried twice. He was 14 years old at the time of his death. He was killed last week, three days before the start of the new school year, so he never got to enter ninth grade. Did the [IDF] planners of the operation give thought to the children who would be killed before giving it the satanic name “Locked Kindergarten”? Did the IDF computer that comes up with the names know that there would be five children and adolescents among the dead?

…This sprawling, overcrowded residential [Saja'iya] neighborhood was occupied for almost a week by the IDF. The army wreaked destruction in it. A monstrous bulldozer maliciously potholed a few roads, scarring the asphalt with gaping wounds, for no apparent reason. Houses were hit, street tiling was uprooted, electricity poles were cut down, cars were crushed, dozens of trees were destroyed and 22 residents were killed. For almost a week the tens of thousands of residents lived in terror, some of them unable to leave their homes.

…[Just before he died] Mohammed walked toward Mansura Street, the neighborhood’s main thoroughfare, where the tanks were. According to one account, he was asked to go there to see how his uncles, who lived in the line of fire, were doing; another version has it that he went to see the tanks and help the “defenders,” as they call themselves in this fighting family.

…Last Tuesday his sister came to the house and said there was a wounded boy on Mansura Street. Abdullah rushed to Shifa Hospital. “I looked everywhere but couldn’t find him. I thought maybe he was in surgery, but no. I had a feeling that Mohammed was a shahid [martyr].

“I thought maybe he was transferred to another hospital and I sent relatives to look in Al-Quds Hospital. They didn’t find him there. The feeling that he was a shahid grew stronger. I thought that if he was not in the hospital, he must be lying at the place where he was killed. It would be very hard to get there and get him out. We know that if anyone is wounded there, no one can get close enough to get him out. We know that the army shoots at anyone who approaches there, even at rescue parties. There were cases of people who tried to rescue the wounded and were shot.

“Then I thought he must be in the hospital refrigerator. I asked my cousins to go and check. There were a few shahids there, and they saw them, but they came back and said they did not find Mohammed. The feeling that Mohammed was a shahid grew stronger in me. But there was no announcement.

“I decided to go to the morgue and look. I went in but I didn’t find Mohammed. Then I saw half a body, the only one that was not identified. I saw that it was Mohammed’s half-body. By the belt. It’s a belt that I bought him. And the shoes he wore. I looked at the socks and I knew it was Mohammed. I was sure it was Mohammed. The upper half of the body had disappeared.

“Mohammed was killed by two shells fired by a tank, and both shells hit him. Mohammed is fourteen years and four months old. He was not armed and he didn’t know what a weapon was. They saw that he was a boy. Maybe he went there to see the defenders, maybe he wanted to take part. Maybe he threw stones at a tank. They fired a shell at him. That is Mohammed’s story and that is the end of Mohammed.”

Mohammed was buried that day. The next day, last Wednesday, when the IDF left Mansura, they went to the killing place to look for the other half of Mohammed. They found his body parts together with the body parts of Yusri Abu Jabber, a press photographer for the Al-Quds network, who was also killed there. The rest of Mohammed’s body was buried on Wednesday. Abdullah, the father: “Mohammed was a schoolboy. That is the whole story of Mohammed. It happens every day, every day. Can a boy like this, like Mohammed, be a danger to them? And if he was a danger to them, they could have wounded him instead of killing him. They could have thrown a teargas grenade at him. Even if he was a danger to them, you don’t fire a shell at him.”

The IDF Spokesperson’s Office, this week: “The IDF is not aware of a 14-year-old boy being hit other than from media reports, and is not familiar with the circumstances in which he was hit. It should be noted that on the day the report was published there were heavy exchanges of fire, which included the firing of antitank missiles, the detonation of explosive devices, and light-arms fire against IDF forces.”

His youngest child, Ibrahim, is on his knees, scribbling on himself with a pen. Abdullah gags every so often. Abir is pregnant, and if it’s a boy they will name him Mohammed.

And what do you think this newborn Mohammed will grow up to be? And why do you think he will grow up to avenge his brother? Because an IDF spokesperson doesn’t have the human decency to say a kind word about a lowly Palestinian boy killed by two of its rocket shells which tore his body to pieces for no good reason. Because a stupid IDF and Israeli government doesn’t have the vision to embrace a negotiated end to this horrific conflict that kills the soul, spirit and bodies of both nations.

Hat tip to Haitham Sabbah.

IDF Gaza Invasion Continues Relentless Spree of Civilian Deaths

Saturday, September 2nd, 2006

The horror of the Lebanon war has caused many of us to take the eye off the ball that is Operation Summer Rain, that odd non sequitur of a military campaign still raging in Gaza. Summer Rain is the IDF response to the kidnapping of Gilad Shalit. It is a brutal, disproportionate campaign against the people of Gaza, militants and civilians alike. It is much like Lebanon in that Israel still has not succeeded in its two goals of freeing Shalit and ending militant rocket fire against southern Israel. The only difference with Lebanon, unfortunate though it is for the Gazans, is that they have none of the weaponry or military training of Hezbollah and so are not able to make the IDF pay a price for its brutality.

Yes, what I wrote above is strong language; language pro-Israel partisans don’t like to hear. But if you take issue with my views I challenge you to both read and ponder Gideon Levy’s latest Haaretz column, which details the enormous cost in civilian lives of this blasted military operation. He tells two stories of mass death which wiped out families; and he tells the story from both the family’s and the IDF’s perspective. This juxtaposition is certainly effective and instructive.

The first story concerns an attempt to assassinate Hamas militant leader, Mohammed Deif. I have written about this failed targeted assassination attempt just after it happened in July. But Levy adds the poignant story of the two brothers of the family who were not killed–and who, as a result, have been left orphans. One of the brothers is “seriously injured” and the other cares for him:

Shifa Hospital in Gaza, the fourth floor. Two brothers. Their parents and siblings were all killed while they were sleeping. Only the brothers were saved from the inferno caused by two missiles dropped by a plane on their house in the middle of the night. Awad, 19, is seriously injured; Mohammed, 20, uninjured, tends him. Their parents and all seven of their younger siblings, including a disabled sister, were killed. Just try to imagine.

The signs of shock and grief are obvious on the two orphaned brothers. They stare at the floor, speak very softly; their faces are pale and lifeless, even six weeks after that bloody night. On the wall of the hospital room they’ve taped a picture of their father, taken with Palestinian Prime Minister Ismail Haniyeh.

Dr. Nabil Abu Salmiya was a lecturer in mathematics at the Islamic University in Gaza and a Hamas activist. The wanted man Mohammed Deif visited the family’s home in the middle of the night – and the air force bombed it. Deif was wounded, but survived. A family was almost entirely wiped out. This was on the day that the war broke out in Lebanon; no one paid any attention to the killing in the south.

Here is the IDF’s “justification” for the raid:

The IDF Spokesman’s comment: “In a joint operation of the IDF and the Shin Bet security service, an attack on a house in the northern Gaza Strip was carried out in the early hours of July 12. The house served as a hideout for senior activists in the military wing of Hamas, who planned and carried out acts of terror and the firing of Qassam rockets. At the time of the strike on the house, those present were involved in planning the continued military activity of Hamas. One of those present was Mohammed Deif, who sustained wounds of unknown severity.”

Interestingly, it appears as far as the IDF is concerned there were no civilians present in the house (“those present were involved in planning the continued military of Hamas”). Was the 12 year old disabled sister plotting Hamas military strategy? Were the two boys who were the sole survivors planning a massive rocket attack on Israel? What about the wife, mother of seven, and also killed. Was she a military threat too? No? Then I guess the IDF description of the bombing is truncated and self-serving.

And in case you still harbor any fond feeling for the concept of Israeli targeted assassinations please read my attempt to eviscerate a relatively glowing Washington Post profile of the IDF architects of this heinous policy. And while reading the original WashPo article, please keep the blood, gore and horror of Awad and Mohammed in the front of your mind. The next time you hear an Israeli general or pro-Israel partisan boast about the IDF’s extraordinarily low rate of civilian deaths in targeted killings, remember Awad and Mohammed and his seven dead siblings and two dead parents.

Another point that the IDF explanation above leaves out is that it most certainly knew that Professor Abu Salmiya’s entire family was in the house, yet it chose to bomb it anyway. The chance to “get” Deif was too tantalizing. Yet in the end they didn’t get him. Instead they “got” an entire family in an act of mass civilian murder.

The second is the story of Ahmed Al-Attar, a 17-year old boy who sits in a wheelchair after having both his legs amputated when an IDF missile obliterated a donkey cart in which he, his mother and cousin were riding. Yes, the IAF spends its time targeting donkey carts driven by mothers and children:

Ahmed was injured when the air force fired a missile that hit the mule-drawn wagon in which he was riding with his mother and nephew. They were on the way to pick figs from the family plot near the sea. His mother and the other boy were killed outright; Ahmed lost both legs.

…On July 24, Ahmed and his mother and nephew set out, as they did every day, to the family plot near the sea, to pick some figs. It was around 3 P.M.; they proceeded slowly in their mule-drawn wagon.

“Suddenly we got hit by a missile,” he recalls. “After that I didn’t see anything. I woke up in the hospital and they told me that my mother and Nadi were killed and that my legs were amputated.”

After three days in Shifa, he was transferred to Ichilov Hospital in Tel Aviv, but they couldn’t save his legs there either. He also suffered burns on his head and other parts of his body, and these wounds are still bandaged. Ahmed is a 12th-grader who, two months before the tragedy, married a 16-year-old named Zeina. His mother, Hiriya, was 58; his nephew, Nadi – his mother’s grandson – was 12. Ahmed heard that Nadi was thrown dozens of meters from the wagon, and that his mother’s body was torn to pieces as a result of the direct hit…

Hiriya left nine children and some 50 grandchildren. She was a peddler in the Jabalya market, where she sold figs, grapes and strawberries, and cheese that she made herself…

Someone brings [Ahmed and his father] a picture from the scene of the tragedy: a dead mule…The mule lies on the sand, at the foot of the wrecked wagon. A direct hit.

Here is the IDF explanation of what happened:

The IDF Spokesman: “On the morning of July 24, two Qassam rocket launchings were identified as originating next to the Agricultural College in Beit Hanun. The two rockets were fired at Sderot, and one landed next to a school in the city. Later that same day, IDF forces identified two terrorists, who arrived at that location and loaded the launchers on a mule-drawn wagon. The IDF fired accurately at the point where the terrorists were and at the wagon with the launchers, and verified a hit. At the time of the firing, an older woman and her grandson were not seen in the wagon. In the event that they were riding in the same wagon, then it was the terror organizations that are the ones who took no pity on their lives, and engaged in terror activity directed at Israeli civilians under the cover of noncombatants, exploiting them as a human shield.”

Even if we concede that the wagon did carry a rocket launcher keep in mind that the attack for which it was used caused absolutely no damage to its target as almost all of the Qassams do. So in order to wipe out a single rocket launcher which caused no damage to anyone, the IAF has murdered a mule, two young boys and a mother of nine. Nice work.

The IDF statement deserves some consideration. Notice that the spokesman would have us believe that three people riding in a slow-moving donkey cart were not visible either to the pilot who launched the missile or his spotter (“an older woman and her grandson were not seen in the wagon”). How is that possible? Were they hiding under the figs the wagon carried? I think the IDF takes us all to be fools.

Also, note the IDF isn’t even conceding that Ahmed, his mother and cousin were in the vehicle they attacked (“In the event that they were riding in the same wagon…”). And finally, in the IDF’s twisted account it accepts no blame for the deaths. Instead, sole blame is alloted to the rocket launching crew which stowed the weapon in the wagon (“it was the terror organizations that are the ones who took no pity on their lives…exploiting them as a human shield.”) I have news for these moral cretins. The international law of war doesn’t allow you to argue that your heinous crime was justified because the other side did something just as bad. Your actions are judged independently of all other factors.

I’m certainly not going to argue in defense of Palestinian militants using civilians to transport their weapons. That is also a morally indefensible act. But it in no way whatsoever justifies Israel’s cold-blooded murder of civilians.

Despite the crisis in Lebanon and how absolutely critical it is to resolve it peacefully if possible, let us not forget that other Israeli badge of shame: Gaza and Operation Summer Rain. Ironically, the rainless summer is at an end, Israel has failed in all its goals for the Gaza campaign, and we are about to enter the Mediterranean fall when the rains will come. But with them there will be no end of this failed operation, no end of Gaza deaths, and no sight (yet) of Gilad Shalit.

Lebanon War Fallout: Peretz’s Career Over; Nasrallah’s Regret; and the War Protesters’ Confused Message

Sunday, August 27th, 2006

God, if this interview with Sheikh Nasrallah, the leader of Hezbollah, doesn’t make you pissed then nothing will. I bet many of my fellow bloggers in Lebanon are enraged:

Hezbollah would not have abducted two Israel Defense Forces soldiers on July 12 had it known that the action would lead to war in Lebanon, the movement’s secretary general Hassan Nasrallah said in an interview on Lebanon’s NTV Sunday.

“We did not think that the capture would lead to a war at this time and of this magnitude. You ask me if I had known on July 11 … that the operation would lead to such a war, would I do it? I say no, absolutely not,” he said.

Nasrallah also said he did not believe there would be a second round of fighting with Israel, and stated that Hezbollah would adhere to the cease-fire…

Well, gee. Thanks for your candor and admitting that you goofed big time but…1,000 Lebanese dead, $1-billion damage, 1 million displaced and only now you say you miscalculated. Goddamn. The guy should be flogged within an inch of his life for the utter stupidity of his remarks and strategy. From Beirut to the Beltway has a much fuller and clearer portrayal of Nasrallah’s remarks.

Not that I’m letting the other side off the hook either. Far as I’m concerned, Olmert and his crowd are a perfect match in horrific miscalculation for Nasrallah. The latter didn’t expect Israel’s PM to turn into a virtual madman; and Olmert didn’t expect Hezbollah to fight. Oh how they both erred and both deserve each other! So far none of the leaders have paid for their cruel mistakes–only their people have paid with their lives, the homes, and their livelihoods. To quote a famous 19th century Hasidic rebbe: Leyt din v’leyt dayan (“There is no justice, there is no judge”).

Can Amir Peretz’s political career be over? If recent polls are any indication it might be:

As public criticism against the country’s leadership mounts in the wake of the war in Lebanon, senior sources at the Labor Party predicted Sunday that Defense Minister Amir Peretz might be forced to fight to keep his position as party chairman sooner than in the primaries scheduled for May 2007.

Peretz plummeted in polls held on the weekend, and Labor was shown to have lost half of its support.

According to the sources, “when Amir Peretz scores a single percent on the question whether he is suitable to be prime minister, his public career is over.”

“It is clear to all that a party that wants to survive cannot have as its leader a person who cannot be elected, and it seems that there is no choice but to replace Peretz,” the sources said.

“A single percent?” Wow, that’s amazing. And to think that only six months ago many observers like myself were so hopeful with his victory over Shimon Peres and ascendancy to leadership of the Labor Party. I recall writing here when Peretz accepted the defense portfolio that it was a big gamble which didn’t seem a sure enough bet to be worthy taking. Certainly, if Peretz had been a successful defense minister then his career would’ve been made and he would appear as a truly wise politician. But it seemed more likely that defense might be a trap. He could just as easily fail at a job he’d never had any real preparation for and then be made the scapegoat by his political opponents for his failure. This is precisely what has happened. To quote that old folk song: “I don’t know why he swallowed that fly? I think he’ll die” (politically, that is):

Many at the Labor link the party’s debilitated public standing with Peretz’ agreeing to assume the position of defense minister in the hope this would help build his image as a leader on a national scale.

…Minister Ophir Pines-Paz on Sunday blamed Prime Minister Ehud Olmert for having appointed Peretz as defense minister.

Speaking on Army Radio Pines-Paz said he believes Olmert was wrong in declining Labor’s request to appoint Peretz as finance minister: “This is where the original sin began.”

Yes, indeed the original sin was Olmert’s. But Peretz had the power to say no and ultimately didn’t. It was his career to make or break. And he appears to have broken it.

I have been following the Lebanon war protests as they’ve evolved in Israel over the past week or so. And I must say I’m befuddled. In the U.S., we have an anti-war movement that reflects upon the failure of the Iraq war. But this movement doesn’t say the U.S.’ main mistake has been in not taking it to our enemy forcefully enough. That’s one of the main criticisms offered by the Israeli protesters. I just don’t get it.

You’ve just fought one of the most disastrous wars in the nation’s history. Hundreds killed and wounded. Cities and villages ravaged. The war’s goals unrealized. I’d have thought that the Israeli protesters would have focused on this and drawn the proper conclusion: that the goals and strategy of the war were flawed. But in a country dominated by a military culture and security obsession it is sometimes hard to see things like this clearly.

Gideon Levy has written an incisive critique of the protest movement for Haaretz:

The confused youth who sat crying with their guitars and candles in the city square in Tel Aviv after Rabin’s assassination are now sitting in the Rose Garden opposite the Prime Minister’s Office, no less confused, and seemingly protesting against the war – of course only after it ended.

Just as it was impossible to know what the candle kids wanted, it is difficult to understand what the reservists and the bereaved families want. Most of their complaints should be directed at themselves: Where were you until now? If it is only the demand that some officials go home, it’s a waste of their time and ours. Clones of those who are deposed will replace them very quickly and nothing will change. Olmert, Peretz and Halutz will go home, and Netanyahu, Mofaz and Barak will come to power.

For the first time after many terrible years in which we killed and were killed for no reason, there are question marks hanging over the public discourse. That change should be welcomed. But those who examine the content of the new protest should not hold out great hopes. The arguments of the protesters come down to two main issues, both of them as narrow as the world of the reservist: the IDF wasn’t prepared for the war, and the war was cut short.

On the first matter, many are responsible, and the second issue doesn’t warrant protest. Much weightier and deeper questions hover in the air about why we even went to this war, how it could have been avoided, why is war our only language, what are the limits of power that can be used and where are we going now. The new protest movement is not raising those questions.

…Above all, the petition signers and sit-in protesters in the Rose Garden should ask themselves where they were until now. Except for the “oranges” among them, most voted Kadima, maybe Likud or Labor, many of them served in reserves in the occupied territories, dealt with their personal affairs and kept quiet. For years they took direct or indirect part in worthless national projects, from building the wall to the settlement enterprise and deepening the occupation. With their own eyes they saw how the IDF was turned into an occupying police force, bullying the weak but untrained to deal with the strong.

They protected settlers, saw the suffering caused by the occupation, were witness to or participated in abuse of Palestinians. The responsibility for the IDF’s lack of preparation, therefore, is theirs, partly because of what they did and partly because of their silence. They cannot claim now that they were surprised by the IDF’s failure to execute: they were there when the army changed its face. They knew all these years that checking IDs at roadblocks, invading bedrooms, chasing children in alleys and demolishing thousands of houses is no preparation for war.

Levy raises an important objection to the protesters’ charge that the war was cut short. His sentiment is one I’ve voiced here in praise of Olmert’s decision to curtail the war:

The other matter, the halt in the fighting, certainly does not warrant protest, but actually a compliment. Instead of asking why the war broke out, the protesters are asking why it ended. If there is anything that the war’s command deserves credit for it is its hesitation in the final stages of the war. It is a shame they did not hesitate sooner. And if we had continued the war, where exactly would we have ended up? It was the resolve, hubris and haste of the war’s leadership in the first stages that were the original sin against which the protest should be directed.

Levy concludes with his most telling criticism of the new protest movement: it’s lack of moral focus.

Above all, it is depressing to find out that none of the protesters are raising moral questions. A protest movement that says nothing about the terrible destruction we wreaked in Lebanon, how we killed hundreds of innocent civilians and turned tens of thousands into impoverished refugees is by definition not a moral movement. Even after it has been proved that the excessive force was not effective, no protest has been directed at it. How long will we only focus on ourselves and our distress?

Is it too much to ask for the protesters, who are supposedly the cadres of the avant garde, to look for a moment at what we did to another nation? Why is it that after Sabra and Chatilla massacres, which were not even directly our handiwork, masses of people took to the streets and now nobody peeps about the destruction we sowed in Lebanon with our own hands, and for nothing?

This movement has no clear vision, no clear agenda, no clear purpose other than removing Olmert, Peretz and Halutz from office which, as Levy says is a terribly limited set of objectives. I don’t see how it can gain traction and resonate with the broader public in the long term. And if it does, then I fear the damage that will be done in terms of the quality of politicians who will be ascendant in the wake of Olmert’s demise: Netanyahu, Lieberman and the crazy-quilt of the Israeli far right. What a way to run a country! Put the militarists in charge after the utter failure of a militarist solution to the Lebanon conflict. Makes perfect sense to me.

Gideon Levy: ‘Thank God We Lost’

Sunday, August 13th, 2006


Haaretz journalist, Gideon Levy, has written a stunning and lucid account of the lessons he believes Israel should learn from the failed Lebanon war. His is definitely a contrarian approach and not shared by the majority of Israelis. But all movements and ideas which challenge conventional national wisdom begin as minority opinions and gradually move to the mainstream. One can only hope this will happen in Levy’s case. And as the title of the smash Israeli vintage pop hit says: Lu Y’hi (“If [only] it could be”).

The failure in this little war might teach us an important lesson for the future, and maybe influence us to change our ways and language, the language we speak to our neighbors with violence and force. The axiom that “Israel cannot allow itself a defeat on the battlefield” has already been exposed as a nonsensical cliche: Failure might not only help Israel greatly but, as a bonus, it might teach the Americans the important lesson that there is no point in pushing Israel into military adventures.

Maybe now, this war will also bring us back down to reality, where military force is only military force, and cannot guarantee everything. After all, we are constantly scoring “victories” and “achievements” against the Palestinians. And what comes of them? Deterrence? Have the Palestinians given up their dreams to be free people in their own country?

The IDF’s failure against Hezbollah is not a fateful defeat. Israel killed and absorbed casualties, but its existence or any part of its territory were not endangered for a moment. Our favorite phrase, “an existential war” is nothing more than another expression of the ridiculous pathos of this war, which from the start was a cursed war of choice.

In the above paragraph, Levy is debunking a powerful myth that is seared into the consciousness of almost all Israelis: “our first defeat will be our last.” An acquaintance with whom I used to be close, made aliya to Israel and holds relatively mainstream (right of center) views. But on the issue of Iran and Islamic ‘extremism’ he is implacable. Iran is Nazi Germany. Ditto Nasrallah and Hezbollah. The sooner we get the war (against Iran) over the better. Islamofascists are “not human.” To the charge that he had turned racist somewhere over the past 20 years, he demurred. He’s not racist at all. You can see the uphill battle that Levy will have to wage.

In this passage, Levy spins a horrifying scenario as to what might’ve happened had the IDF won a quick, smashing victory against Hezbollah:

It is not difficult to imagine what would have happened if Hezbollah had been defeated within a few days from the air, as promised from the start by the bragging of the heads of the IDF. The success would have made us insane. The U.S. would have pushed us into a military clash with Syria and, drunk with victory, we might have been tempted. Iran might have been next. At the same time we would have dealt with the Palestinians: What went so easily in Lebanon, we would have been convinced, would be easily implemented from Jenin to Rafah. The result would have been an attempt to solve the Palestinian problem at its root by pounding, erasing, bombing and shelling.

The most important lesson for Israel to draw from this misadventure is that its power has limits and that it must try new approaches other than purely military solutions:

Maybe all that won’t happen now because we have discovered first-hand that the IDF’s power is much more limited than we thought and were told. Our deterrent capacity might now work in the opposite direction. Israel, hopefully, will think twice before going into another dangerous military adventure. That is comforting news. On the other hand, it is true that there is the danger the IDF will want to restore its lost honor on the backs of the helpless Palestinians. It didn’t work in Bint Jbail, so we’ll show them in Nablus.

However, if we internalize the concept whereby what does not work by force will not work with more force, this war could bring us to the negotiating table. Seared by failure, maybe the IDF will be less enthusiastic to rush into battle. It is possible the political echelon will now understand that the response to the dangers facing Israel is not to be found in using more and more force; that the real response to the legitimate and just demands of the Palestinians is not another dozen Operation Defensive Shields, but in respecting their rights; that the real response to the Syrian threat is returning the Golan to its rightful owners, without delay; and that the response to the Iranian danger is dulling the hatred toward us in the Arab and Muslim world.

If indeed the war ends as it is ending, maybe more Israelis will ask themselves what we are killing and being killed for, what did we pound and get pounded for, and maybe they will understand that it was once again all for naught. Maybe the achievement of this war will be that the failure will be seared deeply into the consciousness, and Israel will take a new route, less violent and less bullying, because of the failure.

There does not appear to be any hope that the IDF officer corps can absorb any such lessons. And there is little hope that those Israeli politicians who represent such views can win a national election. So it leaves us quite uncertain about when and how sanity can return to Israeli policy toward its neighbors.

Gideon Levy: Don’t Miss Second Opportunity for Peace With Syria

Sunday, August 6th, 2006

Gideon Levy, a senior Haaretz correspondent, paints a heartbreaking “what if” scenario regarding Israeli relations with Syria. What if, when a peace deal with Syria was dangled before Ehud Barak’s eyes in 2000, he had had the courage to go for it instead of getting cold feet and turning it down? What if the settler movement had not clouded the eyes of Israelis with patriotic Biblical fervor and Israel had ended the Occupation? And why does Israel seem to miss every opportunity thrust upon it to achieve peace with its enemies?

Ending the occupation could have prevented this unnecessary war. If Israel had returned the Golan Heights and signed a peace treaty with Syria in a timely fashion, presumably this war would not have broken out.

Peace with Syria would have guaranteed peace with Lebanon and peace with both would have prevented Hezbollah from fortifying on Israel’s northern border. Peace with Syria would have also isolated Iran, Israel’s true, dangerous enemy, and cut off Hezbollah from one of the two sources of its weapons and funding. It’s so simple, and so removed from conventional Israeli thinking, which is subject to brainwashing.

For years, Israel has waged war against the Palestinians with the main motive of insistence on keeping the occupied territories. If not for the settlement enterprise, Israel would have long since retreated from the occupied territories and the struggle’s engine would have been significant neutralized. Not that a non-occupying Israel would have turned into the darling of the Arab world, but the destructive fire aimed at Israel would have significantly lessened, and those who continued to fight Israel would have found themselves isolated…

Former-prime minister Ehud Barak criminally missed the opportunity to sign a peace treaty with Syria after he got “cold feet,” as witnesses said, and retreated at the last minute. That’s how it works with us. When the other side is quiet, why return territories? And when they do go to war, “there’s nobody to talk to,” and certainly not while we are “under fire.”

While we are ready to jump on any war bandwagon, as in this time, we endlessly procrastinate when it comes to peace negotiations. Now, too, when Syria, pushed around by the U.S., desperately wants to return to the “family of nations,” is an excellent time to try to make peace with it – but there are those who say now is not the time. What will the Americans say? They, after all, are against any deals with Bashar Assad of “the axis of evil.”

So, there it is, another excuse to miss a golden opportunity, another mendacious excuse. As in the case of the peace with Egypt, the move that has guaranteed Israel’s security for years far more than any war, and which was put together behind the America’s back, America would not be able to oppose a peace agreement with Syria. Now, after we’ve hit Hezbollah and ruined Lebanon, the prime minister of Israel should declare: the Golan for peace. That could contribute a lot more to our security than a thousand useless daring operations in Baalbek, but it would take a lot more courage than going off to fight another unnecessary and useless war.

Ehud Olmert, of course, does not have the vision to understand how critical such an agreement with Syria would be. Even Ariel Sharon, Ehud Barak and all previous Israeli prime ministers going back to 1967 did not understand the importance of this issue. It will take a far bolder politician than Olmert to understand what Levy is saying here. And that’s a shame because the wars will continue and the civilians and soldiers on both sides will die. All because no Israeli politician is willing to break loose from conventional wisdom and take a chance on peace.

Israel to Critics of Gaza Invasion: ‘Quiet, We’re Shooting!’

Wednesday, July 5th, 2006

Today, another two Qassam rockets hit Ashkelon despite the fact that the IDF simultaneously moved troops into northern Gaza in order to quell precisely such rocket fire:

It [The IDF] intends to capture a broad swath of territory of about one-and-a-quarter kilometers into Palestinian Authority territory, close to Beit Hanun, in an effort to hinder Qassam rocket launchers from targeting Ashkelon and to push them back toward Gaza City and the Jabalya refugee camp.

A lot of good it’s doing. And even if the latest IDF incursion does swallow up ground the rocketeers used for their launches–do we doubt for one second that militants will find some other way to achieve their aims of hurtling missiles at Israeli territory? And here’s another little bit of self-delusion:

We won’t sink in the Gaza swamp, but will enter any necessary area to carry out our missions,” Defense Minister Amir Peretz said Wednesday.

It’s as if Peretz were smart enough to recognize the criticism but too dumb to realize that it will prove prophetic.

Gideon Levy has written yet another stellar and incisive piece of analysis of Israeli policy toward the Palestinians, this time regarding the increasingly doomed invasion of Gaza. One of his most important points is that Israel’s behavior there is in many ways almost a perfect mirror image of Palestinian militant behavior. Not to say that means that I’m attempting to legitimate one or both. Both are equally reprehensible:

The “summer rains” we are showering on Gaza are not only pointless, but are first and foremost blatantly illegitimate. It is not legitimate to cut off 750,000 people from electricity. It is not legitimate to call on 20,000 people to run from their homes and turn their towns into ghost towns. It is not legitimate to penetrate Syria’s airspace. It is not legitimate to kidnap half a government and a quarter of a parliament.

A state that takes such steps is no longer distinguishable from a terror organization. The harsher the steps, the more monstrous and stupid they become, the more the moral underpinnings for them are removed and the stronger the impression that the Israeli government has lost its nerve…

Levy points out the the emperor, in the form of the government and its claims that the invasion is meant to free the kidnapped Israeli soldier, has no clothes. The Gaza operation, like Sharon’s invasion of Lebanon 23 years earlier, was a ‘wish list’ for strategic goals the IDF had not been able to accomplish (stilling the Qassams) by other means:

Everything must be done to win Gilad Shalit’s release. What we are doing now in Gaza has nothing to do with freeing him. It is a widescale act of vengeance, the kind that the IDF and Shin Bet have wanted to conduct for some time, mostly motivated by the deep frustration that the army commanders feel about their impotence against the Qassams and the daring Palestinian guerrilla raid. There’s a huge gap between the army unleashing its frustration and a clever and legitimate operation to free the kidnapped soldier…

Here Levy reminds us that Hamas’ kidnapping of Shalit is not that much different from the IDF and Shin Bet’s kidnapping of Palestinian civilians for the alleged purpose of combatting terror:

The legitimate basis for the IDF’s operation was stripped away the moment it began. It’s no accident that nobody mentions the day before the attack on the Kerem Shalom fort, when the IDF kidnapped two civilians, a doctor and his brother, from their home in Gaza. The difference between us and them? We kidnapped civilians and they captured a soldier, we are a state and they are a terror organization. How ridiculously pathetic Amos Gilad sounds when he says that the capture of Shalit was “illegitimate and illegal,” unlike when the IDF grabs civilians from their homes. How can a senior official in the defense ministry claim that “the head of the snake” is in Damascus, when the IDF uses the exact same methods?

True, when the IDF and Shin Bet grab civilians from their homes – and they do so often – it is not to murder them later. But sometimes they are killed on the doorsteps of their homes, although it is not necessary, and sometimes they are grabbed to serve as “bargaining chips,” like in Lebanon and now, with the Palestinian legislators. What an uproar there would be if the Palestinians had grabbed half the members of the Israeli government. How would we label them?

Levy reminds us that IDF policy regarding Gaza violates the Geneva Convention prohibition against collective punishment of civilian populations:

Collective punishment is illegitimate and it does not have a smidgen of intelligence. Where will the inhabitants of Beit Hanun run? With typical hardheartedness the military reporters say they were not “expelled” but that it was “recommended” they leave, for the benefit, of course, of those running for their lives. And what will this inhumane step lead to? Support for the Israeli government? Their enlistment as informants and collaborators for the Shin Bet? Can the miserable farmers of Beit Hanun and Beit Lahia do anything about the Qassam rocket-launching cells? Will bombing an already destroyed airport do anything to free the soldier or was it just to decorate the headlines?

Levy warns that Israel’s unstated policy objective of toppling the Hamas government is one whose repercussions have been left unexamined to potentially fatal results. In fact, this lack of policy planning reminds me precisely of the Bush Administration’s complete lack of a plan for administering Iraq after military ‘victory’ was secured. After winning, what would we do to secure and maintain the peace? How would we guarantee the ‘natives’ wouldn’t get restless once they realized we were occupying their country with no plans to leave anytime soon? None of this was foreseen by U.S. military planners just as the long-range effects of the Gaza invasion have remained ‘out of sight, out of mind.’ But we Americans know that unexamined issues have a way of rearing their ugly heads and biting you in the ass:

Did anyone think about what would have happened if Syrian planes had managed to down one of the Israeli planes that brazenly buzzed their president’s palace? Would we have declared war on Syria? Another “legitimate war”? Will the blackout of Gaza bring down the Hamas government or cause the population to rally around it? And even if the Hamas government falls, as Washington wants, what will happen on the day after? These are questions for which nobody has any real answers. As usual here: Quiet, we’re shooting. But this time we are not only shooting. We are bombing and shelling, darkening and destroying, imposing a siege and kidnapping like the worst of terrorists and nobody breaks the silence to ask, what the hell for, and according to what right?

Gideon Levy: Palestinian Economic Boycott Failed, Diplomatic Isolation Will Fail–Recognize Hamas

Thursday, May 18th, 2006

Haaretz columnist, Gideon Levy has a provocative essay in Counterpunch arguing that Israel’s policy of isolating Hamas and strangling Palestine economically and financially after its election victory is an abject failure. What’s more the U.S. and international community which danced to Israel’s tune in implementing this iron fist policy, have proven themselves to be willing co-conspirators in Israeli folly:

gideon levyHaaretz columnist Gideon Levy says: “Stop the charade–recognize Hamas”

This was an especially short masked ball: Two or three months and the “boycott” party of the Palestinian Authority ended. It was also an especially stupid masked ball: Hamas can now brandish a real achievement. Israel and the world have surrendered unconditionally, and the flow of money to the territories is being renewed.

The problem is that some of the masks have remained, and the foolishness continues: Israel and the world will not transfer monies “directly” to the Hamas government, but rather by means of a special “Hamas bypass” mechanism. This unnecessary mask will also be removed quickly.

What has Israel gained from this game? Nothing. It has only lost…

Nothing has come of this cat-and-mouse game that the world played, under Israel’s coaching, with the elected Palestinian government…The world needs to pause for a moment and ask itself, how come one small country can make a mockery of it in this way and cause great powers to act in such an unintelligent way? Anyone who examines the decision by the Quartet to boycott the Hamas government cannot but wonder where Israel gets the power to squeeze out more and more decisions that are contrary to the international interest and, in fact, to its own interests.

Levy warns that Israel cannot long expect for the world to dance to its tune regarding its approach to the Palestinians:

Will Israel’s imagined diplomatic strength serve it in the long term? Certainly not. The day will come when the world will tire of the unnecessary games Israel and the United States force upon it.

Levy calls on Israel and the world to recognize the “first principles” of this conflict:

It is necessary to go back to the two eternal verities: First of all, the Palestinian people elected Hamas in democratic elections, which were held at the initiative of the United States and with Israel’s agreement; secondly, the state of Israel bears the responsibility for the fate of the population in the occupied territories. You wanted elections? Hamas was elected. You wanted to topple the Palestinian Authority under the leadership of the Palestine Liberation Organization? Here are the results. You want occupation? You have to pay the price. There is no way of escaping this.

Levy warns that just as the economic boycott failed, diplomatic isolation is also certain to fail. He predicts world recognition, including by Israel, of Hamas. Instead of wasting precious time, we should face the music and dance–Hamas is the partner; Hamas is key, all roads to peace lead through Hamas (and Abbas):

The world has chosen to take indirect responsibility for what is happening: Instead of bringing about an end to the occupation, it prefers to grant aid. For the fans of the occupation in Israel this is a very convenient solution, so it is impossible to understand why Israel has tried to sabotage this, too. Why is transferring money through the incorrupt Hamas unacceptable and transferring money through the corrupt Fatah acceptable? The assumption that economic pressure on the PA will lead to the fall of the elected government was a crazy idea. Pressure of this kind only reinforces Hamas and hostility toward Israel. There is no “Hamas bypass” road. Israel and the world must recognize this.

Any diplomatic or economic progress will henceforth go through the headquarters of the movement that was elected to govern. Just as the economic boycott held up for only a few weeks, the diplomatic boycott will also not last long. Sweden has already welcomed in its territory two representatives of Hamas, the other European countries will follow suit, the United States will have to join in, and Israel’s turn will also come, hideously late, of course, and it will recognize the Hamas government.

Therefore, it is necessary to ask: Why wait? The lesson from the short-lived economic boycott must be learned now. Israel has already missed the Abu Mazen train and he is now the Palestinian Shimon Peres: It’s pleasant to talk to him but what he says no longer has much influence or significance. Yet, nevertheless, having allotted half a year to diplomatic negotiations, Israel must immediately initiate a meeting with Palestinian Authority Chairman Mahmoud Abbas, if it really wants to negotiate. Instead of traveling to Washington and Cairo, Prime Minister Ehud Olmert should have gone to Ramallah first.