Mahzor

New York Public Library

Churches

Sarajevo Haggadah

Mah Nishtanah

Sarajevo haggadah

Antaea Darom

Israeli women's art

Action

Torah as music

Ben Heine

Action

ceramic bowl

Mohammad Said Kalash, "Offering Reconciliation" exhibit (photo: Ilan Amihai)

Action

Punch and Judy/Pinchas and Jamila

Avi Katz

Action

David Grossman

Ben Heine

Action

Eldrige Street shul

Lower East Side

Action

Dove

Ben Heine

Action

Two birds

Hoda Jamal

Action

Israeli and Palestinian boys

from documentary, Promises

Action

Cat in the Hat

Yiddish version

Action

Daylight through the Wall

Banksy: graffiti art on Separation Wall

Action

Maurice Sendak's Brundibar set

New Victory Theater (photo: Nan Melville/NYT)

Action

Daniel Barenboim, West-Eastern Divan Orchestra

Palestinian-Israeli musical ensemble (photo: Kerstin Joensson/AP)

Action

Great Day on Eldrige Street

N.Y.'s klezmer greats celebrate shul rededication (photo: Leo Sorel)

Action

Joint Appeal for Peace

(Avi Katz)

Joint Appeal for Peace

Ketubah, Ancona, Italy (1772)

(Jewish Theological Seminary library)

Ancona ketubah

Posts Tagged ‘geert wilders’

Geller’s Multi-Million Dollar NYC, Florida Digs

Thursday, October 14th, 2010
330 east 57th street pam geller's building

A representative condo listing in Pam Geller's East 57th Street building

Pam Geller doesn’t suffer for her art.  Her N.Y. Times profile noted that she owns a full-floor Eastside Midtown condo (330 East 57th Street).  Condos in the same building have gone for nearly $2. 75-million with yearly maintenance fees over $100,000.  In addition, she appears to own a second residence in upscale L’Hermitage II in Ft. Lauderdale (3200 North Ocean Blvd.) worthy nearly $1-million.  Strangely, she signed over the Florida condo to her ex-husband for only $10 only weeks before he died in 2008.  Hard to conceive of any reason why anyone would deed a major piece of property to one’s ex-spouse who was already remarried. Since she continues to produce Vlogs from the Florida residence and the tax bill for the property is still sent to her address, the settlement of Oshry’s estate may have deeded it back to her.

Now, I can understand what David Yerushalmi sees in having Geller as a client, as long as she pays her bills.  I presume he isn’t representing her pro bono.

I wonder whether Geert Wilders gets the full Geller treatment when he visits New York–a guest room with sweeping views of the midtown skyline perhaps?  That would explain some of the allure she may have for him.

If I were Jay Marcus, president of the most successful U.S. settler fundraising project, the Central Fund of Israel, I’d have Pam in my sights for a large tax-deductible donation.  Though it remain to be seen whether Geller has any sense of the Jewish obligation to offer tzedakah to those in need (not that the settlers are).  My guess is that a Jewish girl from Hewlett who marries into money tends to see the world as owing her rather than the other way around.

One of the many odd revelations about Geller provided by the Times profile was that after 9/11 she underwent a period of ‘study’ of Islam.  Don’t worry.  She didn’t trouble her pretty little head with any heavy intellectual lifting or visits to a research library or courses at a university or even reading a historical source.

Who were her teachers?  A Muslim?  No.  Not even the neocon darling, Bernard Lewis.  I suppose for the reason that he may use too many multi-syllable words.  Who is one of her tutors?  Daniel Pipes.  I kid you not.  And then she adds that she’s broken with Pipes because he actually has the temerity to believe there is such a thing as a moderate Muslim, a possibility Geller denies.

Dutch University Fires Ramadan for Hosting TV Show for Iran-Backed Network

Saturday, August 22nd, 2009
Tariq Ramadan, pawn in Dutch far-right anti-Muslim electioneering

Tariq Ramadan, pawn in Dutch far-right anti-Muslim electioneering (AP)

Here I thought that only the Bush administration ham-handedly overreacted to the alleged threat of Muslim militantcy by denying Tariq Ramadan a visa to teach at Notre Dame. Now, a Dutch university and city have engaged in the same type of ludicrous conduct in firing Tariq Ramadan from a teaching job at the school and from a job helping the city to encourage the intergration of Muslim residents into communal life. Ramadan’s offense: he conducts a TV show about Islam on the Iran-backed Press TV. Apparently, in doing so Ramadan has somehow become an apologist for “mad mullahs” who stole the recent presidential election:

The controversial Islamic theologian Tariq Ramadan has been fired from two jobs in the Netherlands for allegedly endorsing the Iranian regime by hosting a chat show on a Tehran-backed TV channel.

Mr Ramadan…has dismissed the decisions as “simplistic” and driven by the “Islamophobia” generated in Dutch politics by the populist campaigner Geert Wilders.

…The city of Rotterdam and the Erasmus University based in the city have jointly decided to dismiss him from his posts as community adviser and visiting lecturer on religion. This follows several days of heated debate in the Netherlands about Mr Ramadan’s position as a presenter of a political chat show on Press TV, a London-based, Iranian-backed satellite TV channel.

In a joint statement, the city and the university criticised Mr Ramadan for remaining host of Islam and Life despite the “hard-handed stifling” of opposition to the results of the July elections. They said that he had “failed sufficiently to realise the feelings that participation in this television program… might provoke in Rotterdam and beyond”.

This, of course is preposterous reasoning because Ramadan has specifically denounced the Iranian regime’s behavior in rigging the election.  His show too is a free-wheeling one which tackles all manner of issues related to Islam and by no means whitewashes either Islam in general or Iran in particular.

The Islamic scholar has struck out against his detractors and plans to take them to court.  He defends himself:

…Dismissing the allegations as driven by Dutch politics rather than a TV programme devoted to “critical debate” on Islam.”…It is as if I in particular, and Islam in general, were being used to promote certain political agendas in the upcoming Dutch elections. Geert Wilders, who wins votes while comparing the Koran to Hitler’s Mein Kampf, casts a long shadow.”

Mr Ramadan said that he had publicly criticised the repression of opposition in Iran and supported the country’s “long march… toward transparency and respect for human rights”.  His TV show was committed to “critical debate”. His guests had included “atheists, rabbis, priests, women with and without headscarves”. They had debated issues such as “freedom, reason, interfaith dialogue…and jihad…I challenge my critics to scrutinise these programmes and in them to find the slightest evidence of support for the Iranian regime.”

At least two people with divergent political views who I know and respect have been guests on Press TV: Dan Fleshler and Juan Cole.  [CORRECTION: Juan Cole has not been interviewed on Press TV, but Zbigniew Brzezinski, Norman Finkelstein and Noam Chomsky, among others, have.]  Does this mean that they too have drunk the Kool Aid and become raving defenders of the Iranian regime?  C’mon.  As I said above, this is ludicrous.  If a Muslim scholar were to host a regular show on Voice of America does this mean that he would be an American stooge and defender of every outrage perpetrated by this country against Muslims?

Apparently, Rotterdam’s mayor is Muslim and I’m guessing that this is an attempt by his political opponents to embarrass him.  In fact, this entire episode may be more about the mayor and Ramadan may only be a useful foil for the anti-Islamist right.

If he hasn’t already written about this, someone pick up the phone and tell Daniel Pipes that the Islamists have been vanquished at the dikes of the Zuider Zee just before their onslaught on all of European civilization.  Thank God some [Christian] God-fearing souls were willing to stand up against Trojan Horses like Ramadan, who sweet talk their way into the salons of the effete liberal-class, thus dissolving their will to hold the breach against the Mohammedan horde.

Museum of In-Tolerance Screens Muslim-Hating Film, Third Jihad

Thursday, May 21st, 2009

3rd-jihad-banner

Los Angeles’ Museum of In-Tolerance, named in honor of Nazi-hunter Simon Wiesenthal, is now steeped in Muslim hatred. Rabbi Marvin Hier, its current leader, has endorsed the Iran yellow star hoax. Now, he’s actively promoting one of the most Islamophobic films ever produced, Third Jihad.

The Clarion Fund is listed as the sponsor of the film, though its creators (including Rabbi Raphael Shore) are affiliated with the pro-settler Aish Hatorah, a group based in Israel.  Clarion appears to be little more than a domestic shell organization designed to enable the producers to claim the film was made in the U.S.

Third Jihad features Zuhdi Jasser, who though he professes to be Muslim, seems to detest almost everything about his religion, especially anything that remotely hints of Islam existing in a political context.  Jasser runs a one man Muslim organization which is characterized in an IPS story thus:

American Islamic Forum for Democracy…according to its website, is a non-profit which seeks to “intellectually stand against the religious fanatics who exploit the religion of Islam for a nihilistic, anti-American anti-Western war.”

Jasser makes common cause with Muslim haters like Daniel Pipes and other Jewish neocons.  Years ago, he was active in CAIR but that relationship turned sour.  Now he detests everything to do with the national Muslim organization and takes every chance he can to attack it.  Third Jihad provides him all the opportunity he needs.

In the film, he purports to have discovered a radical Muslim version of the Protocols of the Elders of Zion:

“The Third Jihad” is largely based on a document the producers say the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) discovered in 2003. The film’s creators purport the document is a “’Grand Jihad Manifesto’ authored by the Muslim Brotherhood in North America, according to the promotional materials.

“The 15-page document outlines goals and strategies for the infiltration and domination of America from within,” says the release. “Among the strategies discussed is the establishment of ‘moderate’ groups, mosques and Islamic centers across North America in an effort to strategically position Islam so that it might weaken western culture and promote the implementation of Sharia Law.”

CAIR wrote a letter of protest to Rabbi Hier about the profound insult that this film poses to all American Muslims.  But Hier has about as much sensitivity to the concerns of Muslims as a deaf person would have to Beethoven’s Fifth Symphony.

The Wiesenthal Center screenings were co-sponsored by another extremist group, the American Freedom Alliance.  One look at its website makes you realize you’re visiting territory so far off the right side of the universe it might as well be Pluto.  Here’s but a taste:

The American Freedom Alliance is a non-political, non partisan, movement of concerned Americans which identifies threats to western civilization. The organization promotes networking, activism and education in the following six areas:

* The Islamic penetration of Europe
* The collapse of academic freedom
* The identification and sources of media bias
* The growth of radical environmentalism
* The necessity for missile defense
* The dangers presented by the global governance movement

IPS notes that the Washington, D.C. screening of the film was promoted and documented by the International Free Press Society, which also heavily publicized the U.S. speaking tour of far-right Dutch Muslim hater, Geert Wilders.  He himself produced an anti-Muslim film screed, Fitna, which I jokingly called here “Dutch for garbage.”  Even the ADL has labelled Wilders “inflammatory” and Britain has refused him entry.  Both Wilders and some members of IFPS have been linked to the Belgian neo-fascist group, Vlaams Belang.

All in all, this is a nice set of bedfellows with whom the Clarion Fund and the Museum of Tolerance are sleeping.  But Rabbi Hier and Raphael Shore should remember what happens when you lie down with dogs…

I find it sad to report that just as Wilders spoke to synagogue audiences during his tour here, Detroit’s Temple Israel also screened Third Jihad.  Someone should ask Rabbi Joshua Bennett what he was thinking when he invited these hatemongers into his shul.

The brutal truth of the matter is that instead of awakening the world to the danger of radical Islam, films like this actually promote Islamophobia and are conducive to an atmosphere that provokes violence against American Muslims.

H/t to Aziz Poonawalla.

Among Anti-Muslim Warriors, Pipes is a Dove

Sunday, December 14th, 2008

I know it doesn’t seem possible and I wouldn’t believe it if I hadn’t read it with my own eyes but…the Israeli far-right hosted an “international conference on jihad” at which Pipes was actually the liberal in the room.  That should tell you about what garbage the rest of the anti-Muslim jihadis were spewing.

Among them was Geert (“‘Fitna’ is Dutch for ‘Garbage’”) Wilders who denied that there is such a thing as moderate Islam:

Wilders…told his listeners that “as the terrorist attacks in Mumbai proved, there’s no moderate Islam,” and it is time for the West to realize it is “in a conflict with the Muslim faith at large.”

Shockingly, this and similar statements by an Israeli Islam-hater provoked a demurral from Pipes:

Haifa University’s David Bukay…averred that “moderate Islam” does not exist and that the Koran could not be reformed or modernized.

But American scholar and activist Daniel Pipes disagreed…Pipes said the Koran “is like a supermarket where one takes what one wants and leaves the rest.” This freedom of selection, he argued, provides a means for reshaping Islam.

Pipes opined that those who regard Islam rather than jihad as the enemy fail to realize that a change has occurred over the past few years: Although moderate Muslims are still a small force, they are stronger than they were two years ago.

“Millions took to the streets to protest Turkey’s Islamist ruling party, the AKP,” he said when asked to name examples. And “hundreds of thousands demonstrated in Pakistan” following the murder of prime ministerial candidate (and former premier) Benazir Bhutto last year.

Pipes returns to true form by exploiting historical events that provide no support for what he claims they do. In Turkey’s case, the Islamist party actually is the type of moderate Islamic movement Pipes claims to support. The opposition, which he seems to imply represents moderate Islam, does nothing of the sort. It is an anti-Islamic political movement composed of the Turkish military and conservative elements of society whose perogatives are threatened by the ascendancy of political Islam.

In the case of Pakistan, while Bhutto was an opponent of the Pakistani Taliban who may’ve assassinated her, the jury is still out on whether there is enough will within Pakistan to fight Islamic extremism. Pipes’ view that the demonstrations against Bhutto’s murder represent the ascendancy of moderate Islam is far too premature.

And in this passage, Pipes returns to his truly hateful anti-Palestinian form:

Pipes said he supported more determined Western military action against radical Islam as a means of fostering this change. He also advocated “crushing the Palestinians‘ hope for eliminating Israel” and opposed the creation of a Palestinian state and the ongoing peace talks.

That’s my man, Dan. The rejectionist we’ve all come to know and “love.”

You can imagine what type of cauldron of hate the Israeli extremist right is when, at this conference, Dan Pipes is seen as the most sympathetic speaker to Islam. The event was organized by far-right Jewish jihadi, MK Aryeh Eldad.

‘Fitna’: Dutch for ‘Garbage’

Saturday, March 29th, 2008
Geert WildersGeert Wilders of Fitna fame: picture of smug self-promoter

Yes, I know Geert Wilders’ anti-Muslim diatribe, Fitna, has been watched by 400 zillion YouTube viewers. That must make it right, right? Wrong. I watched the first minute or so at the behest of a very nice fellow who’s been helping me upgrade my WordPress installation. As soon as the first panel from the Koran was displayed on screen quoting a verse that threatens death to all and sundry and was followed by the 9/11 plane flying into the World Trade Center, I knew what I was in for. That was enough for me. Do I hear Islamophobia, anyone?

For those of you who have friends, relatives, co-workers, ex-lovers, exogamists, enemies, bores or boors urging you to watch this piece of dreck, read Ali Eteraz’s clever evisceration, Fitna Farce.

And by the way, if anyone thinks you couldn’t make the same film about Judaism or virtually any world religion, they’re sorely mistaken. Do you know how many acts of war, murder, fratricide, genocide and terror there are in the Bible? Many. So many they make my skin crawl. Do you know how many villainous acts Jews commit in the Bible? Many. Does this mean that Judaism is evil? Of course not. Does is justify the hatred of anti-Semites? Of course not.

Does any of what I’m saying justify any of the heinous acts or images seen in Wilders’ film? Of course not. Islamist extremism is no more justified than Jewish extremism.

Every religion contains messages of hate, intolerance and violence. Every religion contains message of love, hope and grace. If we condemn Islam and say it is all bad then let’s condemn every religion and say they’re all bad every one of them. I don’t believe this proposition. I make it just for the sake of argument.

Islam, like all religions, is a reflection of human nature. It seeks perfect faith but is full of imperfections. Aren’t we all?

Performance Optimization WordPress Plugins by W3 EDGE