Muslim and Jewish Women in Nazareth

'We can live in peace'...John Lennon (photo: Dafna Tal)

Mahzor

Mahzor

New York Public Library

Churches

Sarajevo Haggadah

Mah Nishtanah

Sarajevo haggadah

Antaea Darom

Israeli women's art

Action

Torah as music

Ben Heine

Action

ceramic bowl

Mohammad Said Kalash, "Offering Reconciliation" exhibit (photo: Ilan Amihai)

Action

Punch and Judy/Pinchas and Jamila

Avi Katz

Action

David Grossman

Ben Heine

Action

Eldrige Street shul

Lower East Side

Action

Dove

Ben Heine

Action

Two birds

Hoda Jamal

Action

Israeli and Palestinian boys

from documentary, Promises

Action

Cat in the Hat

Yiddish version

Action

Daylight through the Wall

Banksy: graffiti art on Separation Wall

Action

Maurice Sendak's Brundibar set

New Victory Theater (photo: Nan Melville/NYT)

Action

Daniel Barenboim, West-Eastern Divan Orchestra

Palestinian-Israeli musical ensemble (photo: Kerstin Joensson/AP)

Action

Great Day on Eldrige Street

N.Y.'s klezmer greats celebrate shul rededication (photo: Leo Sorel)

Action

Joint Appeal for Peace

(Avi Katz)

Joint Appeal for Peace

Ketubah, Ancona, Italy (1772)

(Jewish Theological Seminary library)

Ancona ketubah

Posts Tagged ‘ft hood massacre’

Hassan’s Supervisors Worried He Was Psychotic Before Rampage

Wednesday, November 11th, 2009

Throughout the aftermath of the Ft. Hood shooting, I’ve argued that we shouldn’t rush to judgment blaming Islam for Nidal Hassan’s aberrant behavior.  If anyone was at fault it was Hassan himself and the tremendous stress under which he was placed as an army psychiatrist about to be deployed to the Afghan war zone.

Now NPR has broken open a new aspect of this story (audio).  As early as 18 months ago, Hassan’s supervisors at Walter Reed Hospital met regularly and discussed Hassan’s bizarre behavior and substandard performance.  Hassan was consistently given substandard evaluations and reprimanded for proselytizing patients.  His superiors even worried whether he might leak military secrets to the enemy if he deployed to the war zone.  They pondered whether he might be capable of the type of fragging incident another Muslim soldier perpetrated against fellow soldiers.  They also noted bizarre, disjointed communication and behavior.

The chief of psychiatry at Walter Reed attempted to begin the process of getting rid of Hassan by approaching two key academic committees.  They both refused.  Instead, they told the chief that Hassan was about to leave Walter Reed on a fellowship.  They should let him go and hope he does better there.

Instead the faculty at the new institution thought his work was “terrible” and they were troubled about his “state of mind.”  They called him “disconnected,”  belligerent,” “aloof.”  After handing in a research paper that his professors found little more than a “religious diatribe,” supervisors worried that he might be “descending into psychosis.”

Despite all this and extraordinarily, none of these individuals ordered Hassan to have a mental health exam or therapy.  Talk about dysfunction. And further, Hassan’s supervisors knew nothing of the 20 e-mails he sent to the radical Imam Al-Awlaki in Yemen.  Intelligence officials claims they told Walter Reed officials about the e mail traffic (though Hassan was at the time no longer working there and the message seems not to have been relayed to those he was working with).  This seems like a repeat of the compartmentalization dividing the FBI and CIA, which enabled 9/11.

The NPR reporter notes that Hassan’s supervisors wanted him sent away “where he wouldn’t hurt anyone.”  So they sent him to Ft. Hood because, ironically, it had a full complement of psychiatrists and other mental health personnel who could “support and monitor him.”  One of those supervisors even said, “we all hoped that Hassan would sort of disappear at Ft. Hood.”  Indeed.

Look, if you’re Daniel Pipes or Steve Emerson there’s plenty here for you to feast on.  But if you’re a reasonable person you realize that Nidal Hassan was not Osama bin Laden.  Instead, he was a mentally ill individual whose sickness allowed him to twist and distort his religious beliefs to serve his psychosis.  Clearly, the army is deeply to blame for this mess.  The system of passing substandard personnel on to the next post out of bureaucratic lethargy; and hoping they will somehow disappear or magically heal themselves and become benign, brought this catastrophe.

In fact, this reminds me a bit of Hurricane Katrina: you have a once a century natural disaster compounded by the utter incompetence of those officials who were supposed to protect public safety.  The hurricane was bad enough.  But when you realize how many things could have been done both before and after the disaster to ameliorate the problem and weren’t; then a disaster becomes a man-made tragedy.

Understanding the Ft. Hood Massacre

Monday, November 9th, 2009
Maj. Nidal Hassan, portrait of troubled American Muslim officer

Maj. Nidal Hassan, in happier times, on completing his medical degree in 2003 (AP)

The nation’s worst peacetime military massacre was perpetrated by a deeply troubled army psychiatrist and devout Muslim.  The motives for the crime are a jumble of the personal, psychological, professional, religious and sectarian.  As is rarely the case in these circumstances, much is grey, and little is black and white except the huge burden of suffering Maj. Nidal Hassan inflicted on the victims and their families.

Though Maj. Hassan’s family emigrated to the U.S. from Ramallah in the 1960s it does not appear, at least at first glance, that the Arab-Israeli conflict was one of his primary grievances.  He had other things troubling him more.  First, sharing the searing pain of his patients who were veterans of the Afghan and Iraq wars. Second, his own imminent deployment to the war zone and all the existential fears this must have invoked.  Third, his escalating opposition to those two wars on the soil of Muslim nations.  Fourth, his conviction that his religion was disrespected in the military ranks.

Let’s be clear.  I’m not excusing or defending in any way Hassan’s killing spree.  He certainly deserves punishment if found guilty after a fair trial.  But I’m not one of those who believes that anything is gained by refusing to examine why things happen and what people think who do bad things.  Only by exploring the dark recesses may we ameliorate conditions for the most troubled, so they don’t feel the need to explode and take their anguish out on the rest of us.

The N.Y. Times’ coverage of this incident earns high marks because it is not focussing only on the superficial facts of the case.  The newspaper is delving deeply into root causes and mental health conditions among military personnel.  For example, I had no idea there are only 400 psychiatrists for 500,000 active duty troops and that patients seeking help can wait as long as a year for an appointment with a psychiatrist.  Also, these vastly overburdened professionals have no organized support system to help them with their own problems brought on by their responsibilities.  They are left on their own when it comes to taking care of their own mental health.

Again, though I’m not excusing Hassan’s actions, I’m troubled that he felt trapped by his commitment to serve the army in return for its financing of his medical education.  His family says (and I have no way of verifying whether this is true or not) that he tried to discuss this with the army and his requests to end his enlistment were turned down.  I understand why the army might not readily wish to allow officers in whom they’ve invested a great deal of time, energy and money to leave the armed services.  But by not providing a clearer path for those in Hassan’s circumstances, they led him to feel trapped.

At least part of Hassan’s motivations appear to be mixed up in a sense of religious rage against the Afghan and Iraq wars and America’s role in them.  As he grew more and more devout, he appears to have adopted at least some of the rationale of Islamists critical of U.S. Middle East policy.  There are many on the right who undoubtedly are attempting to link this crime with Al Qaeda.  But it’s more complicated than that.  This was a homegrown crime by an American Muslim.  It was not a 9/11 act of terror perpetrated by Islamists schooled in Pakistani training camps.  Nidal Hassan was born and raised here.  His parents struggled and worked themselves up by their own bootstraps in the classic immigrant tradition of the American dream.  Once Hassan lost his parents, he appears to have lost some of his bearings, which he attempted to replace by embracing devout Islam.  Unfortunately, it led him to this dead end.

We should be clear that this is not the fault of Islam. It is the fault of a man who searched for answers in Islam and found rage and violence.  It is the man who is imperfect and not the religion.  The man chose violence not the religion.  Those who wish to argue that Islam in particular is a religion of violence must also come to terms with the violence in most of the world’s major religions.  Because Jewish settler terrorists commit mass murder against Palestinians and even their fellow Jews, do we say it is the Jewish religion that is at fault?

As Pres. Obama contemplates our future troop commitments to Afghanistan, I believe that this crime, no matter how inexcusable, is a warning sign of the price we and our soldiers are paying as a nation.  It is too high a price.  Afghanistan is a country steeped in corruption, malfeasance and unresolved ethnic and religious conflict.  I don’t see our presence there as conducive to resolving any of that country’s festering decades-old problems.  And for every Hassan, there are 50 other deeply wounded GIs who may not make us pay a similar price, but whose pain and suffering is no less.  Do we really want to send more of our boys there and suffer the pain of the Hassans and his patients?

Thankfully, army commander Gen. George Casey has expressed concern for the impact that this act could have on the 2,000 Arab-Americans serving in the armed forces.  He understands that not only do these Americans have the right to serve their country, but they can serve it in unique ways through their linguistic and cultural experiences as American Muslims.  Criminalizing all for the crime of a deranged individual does our nation (and Muslims) a deep disservice.

This is precisely what is happening at Ft. Hood and elsewhere in certain cases.  Mikey Weinstein, a retired officer and activist for religious freedom in the military, forwards this communication from the wife of an American Muslim serving in the military:

…I wanted to let you know what life has been like for myself, being an American-Muslim military  spouse, over the last few days here at (military installation withheld), since the Ft. Hood incident. When I  first learned of this, I was sitting in the PX food court with my best friend whose immediate reaction was, “ No offense to you, but Muslims shouldn’t even be allowed in the U.S. Army”. Wow, this was from my best friend here! I have heard this and similar sentiments repeatedly from various “friends”, as well as people insisting it’s really a terror plot.

Since this happening, my Muslim husband, who is deployed to  Afghanistan, has been put on duty to build a chapel on his base, as well as being told not to  associate with the Afghan nationals that work there. I went shopping at the commissary and had people mumbling under their breath but loud enough to ensure that I could hear, things like, “get out of our country”, “go back to your country”, “ F-ing Muslims”, “G-Damn Muslims,” and several other expletives you can insert there. Now people don’t just stare at you when they see you go by wearing hijab, they glare. Last time I checked, I  was born in this country, this is my country, and my husband is serving it and continues to serve it despite the harassment and racism  he encounters. He proudly serves despite the fact that our family pays a higher price for it than many others.