Mahzor

New York Public Library

Churches

Sarajevo Haggadah

Mah Nishtanah

Sarajevo haggadah

Antaea Darom

Israeli women's art

Action

Torah as music

Ben Heine

Action

ceramic bowl

Mohammad Said Kalash, "Offering Reconciliation" exhibit (photo: Ilan Amihai)

Action

Punch and Judy/Pinchas and Jamila

Avi Katz

Action

David Grossman

Ben Heine

Action

Eldrige Street shul

Lower East Side

Action

Dove

Ben Heine

Action

Two birds

Hoda Jamal

Action

Israeli and Palestinian boys

from documentary, Promises

Action

Cat in the Hat

Yiddish version

Action

Daylight through the Wall

Banksy: graffiti art on Separation Wall

Action

Maurice Sendak's Brundibar set

New Victory Theater (photo: Nan Melville/NYT)

Action

Daniel Barenboim, West-Eastern Divan Orchestra

Palestinian-Israeli musical ensemble (photo: Kerstin Joensson/AP)

Action

Great Day on Eldrige Street

N.Y.'s klezmer greats celebrate shul rededication (photo: Leo Sorel)

Action

Joint Appeal for Peace

(Avi Katz)

Joint Appeal for Peace

Ketubah, Ancona, Italy (1772)

(Jewish Theological Seminary library)

Ancona ketubah

Posts Tagged ‘european-union’

Greek Commandos Hijack Audacity of Hope, Bankrupt Government Does Israel’s Bidding, Sabotages Hope

Friday, July 1st, 2011

greek coast guard hijack audacity of hope

Greek coast guard hijacks Audacity of Hope earlier today (Yiorgos Karahalis/Reuters)

The Greek government has now become a direct accomplice of the Israeli plan to sabotage the Gaza flotilla.  When the Audacity of Hope set sail earlier today from its Greek port, a Coast Guard boat intercepted it followed by another full of Greek commandos.  Apparently a nation teetering on the brink of bankruptcy can muster armed to the teeth commandos to commandeer an unarmed civilian vessel full of peace activists.  Instead of saving its country from impending collapse, Greece is petrified of 60 American peace activists in a small boat sailing to Gaza.  For shame.  But this is what happens when your country has mortgaged its future through economic indulgence, leaving itself open to the pressure, blandishments, and extortion of other nations.

In fact, this Haaretz story notes (English) that Bibi Netanyahu engaged in direct personal lobbying of the Greek PM and promised Greece help in its sensitive bailout negotiations with the EU:

Netanyahu recently decided to come to the aid of his newfound friend in a meeting of foreign ministers and European leaders, imploring them to provide Greece with financial aid.

“Netanyahu has become Greece’s lobbyist to the European Union,” an Israeli diplomat said.

In recent weeks, as efforts to stop the impending pro-Palestinian flotilla to Gaza came to a head, Netanyahu reaped the benefits of his investment in Israel-Greece ties and his gamble on the European country paid off.

Several of Israel’s good friends among my readers have taken me to task for my alleged fantasies about collusion between Israel and Greece and my claim (along with that of the Flotilla organizers) that Greece’s current financial crisis has virtually forced it into Israel’s embrace.  Now we have our proof.

Further, Mary Hughes-Thompson, a co-founder of the Gaza Flotilla movement and a passenger on the Canadian boat, Tahrir (also stopped by the Greeks), writes this tonight:

After more than a week of stalling by the Greek authorities, while we were required to produce one form, one authorization, one receipt, one piece of paper after another… and inspection after inspection even though our boat had already passed inspection by the Greeks a few days earlier… yesterday while I was on board doing my “security boat-watch shift,” we were boarded by officials from the coast guard.

After much discussion between the officials and our captain…we realized it wasn’t about pieces of paper or inspections but was in fact a decision already made some days ago that no boat would be allowed to leave Greece with a destination of Gaza.  We quickly mobilized all our delegates to come to the boat with banners and flags, Banners were hung around the boat, we chanted:  FREE GAZA, FREE THE FLOTILLA.  Meantime a huge Coast Guard vessel passed in front the TAHRIR and clearly intended to block us if we tried to leave the port (as the U.S. boat had already done, though we didn’t realize it yet.)

The Opinionator blog wrote earlier today, in a post that otherwise tried to have it both ways and convinced few, about Greece’s decline from the heights of western civilization to its current low state:

Greece, the country that is ever revered as the cradle of democracy, philosophy and pretty much the entirety of Western civilization (no oxymoron jokes, please), is having a tough year. A recent economic near-collapse, European bailout, the difficult passage of a raft of unpopular austerity measures and, of course, angry demonstrations, protests and bloody riots in the streets have tested the country’s fortitude.

…Scott Sayare of The Times reported the latest on Friday, and quoted one activist, who described the situation this way: “It’s like they’ve moved the blockade from Gaza to Greece.”

I can’t help the feeling that Greece is so insolvent that Israel has agreed to pay for all the expenses of mounting this military operation to sink the Hope.  This has to be a new low in the foreign policy of a once proud, independent country.

The U.S. activists aboard the boat believe the government, which has no jurisdiction over the largely American passengers, will target the individual over whom they do have jurisdiction, the Greek captain.  The expectation is that the government will bring charges against him and so effectively torpedo the chances that the boat can sail.  It’s a nice piece of work on the government’s part.  They’ve collaborated with the Israeli and U.S. governments in frustrating the peace plans of the U.S. contingent and removed yet another possible thorn in the side of the Israelis, who will have one less boat to hijack in international waters when the time comes.

As the U.S. boat of course, it was likely to garner the most media attention and leverage the most pressure on the U.S. government.

I have a modest proposal that may shock the Greeks into recognizing that they are playing with fire.  There may be dock workers and port authorities in foreign countries who may not take kindly to Greece’s violation of maritime custom in this case.  They might want to consider treating Greek vessels in their own ports and waters with the same “courtesy” Greece is according the Tahrir and Audacity of Hope.  Two or three can play this game, Greece.

If you share my outrage, you may contact the Greek embassy (nycons@greekembassy.org or 202-939-1300) in Washington (or whatever country you live in) or your local Greek consulate if you live in a major U.S. city:

Consulate General – Chicago
650 North St. Clair Street
Chicago , IL 60611
Telephone: 312.335.3915
Fax: 312.335.3958
Web Address: http://www.greekembassy.org/chicago/
E-mail: chicago@greekembassy.org

Consulate General – San Francisco
2441 Gough Street
San Francisco, CA 94123
Telephone: 415.775.2102
Fax: 415.776.6815
Web Address: http://www.greekembassy.org/sanfrancisco/
E-mail: sfgr@greekembassy.org

Consulate General – Los Angeles
12424 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 800
Los Angeles, CA 90025
Telephone: 310.826.5555
Fax: 310.826.8670
Web Address: http://www.greekembassy.org/losangeles/
E-mail: lagr@greekembassy.org

Consulate General – Tampa
601 Bayshore Blvd., Suite 800
Tampa, FL 33606
Telephone: 813.865.0200
Fax: 813.865.0206
Web Address: http://www.greekembassy.org/tampa
E-mail: grgencon.tam@mfa.gr

Consulate – Atlanta
Tower Place, Suite 1670 3340, Peachtree Rd., N.E.
Atlanta, GA 30326
Telephone: 404.261.3313
Fax: 404.262.2798
Web Address: http://www.greekembassy.org/atlanta/
E-mail: atlanta@greekembassy.org

Consulate – Houston
520 Post Oak Blvd., Suite 450
Houston , TX 77027
Telephone: 713.840.7522
Fax: 713.840.0614
Web Address: http://www.greekembassy.org/houston/
E-mail: houston@greekembassy.org

Joseph Dana has published his latest piece from aboard the Hope.  Here is Assaf Geffen’s piece in Ynetnews, Israel Lost Flotilla War:

It appears that the current flotilla was meant to present Israel’s stupidity.

…Instead of realizing that the best way to counter a public relations flotilla is to ignore it, Israel’s PR geniuses made sure to promote the event with spine-tingling leaks to the media about flotilla members being equipped with chemical weapons, laser guns and dragons.

The only optimistic aspect of this conduct is the hope that flotilla organizers would realize that they don’t really have to sail here and get seasick and all. Their objective – isolating Israel on the international stage and driving it mad – had already been secured.

Greece Colludes Against Gaza Flotilla on Behalf of Israel, U.S.

Sunday, June 26th, 2011
audacity of hope crew

Audacity of Hope crew trains for Gaza Flotilla mission

The U.S. and Israel are afraid of Hope.

Greece is in a dire economic position, teetering on the verge of bankruptcy and threatening to bring down the entire EU currency in the process.  As a result, the government is particularly vulnerable to diplomatic blackmail of the sort Israel and the U.S. are employing to prevent the sailing of several ships of the Gaza Flotilla, in particular the U.S. Audacity of Hope:

Passengers on the U.S. Boat to Gaza, The Audacity of Hope, are asking Greek government officials to clarify whether the[ir] boat…is being blocked from leaving Greece because of…a political decision has been made by the Greek government in response to U.S. and Israeli government pressure. They specifically want to know if the U.S. is using its leverage at the International Monetary Fund over the implementation of an ongoing bailout of European banks with massive Greek debts to compel the Greek government to block the U.S. Boat to Gaza from leaving Greece.

On the morning of June 23, the American passengers learned that a “private complaint” had been filed against the U.S. Boat to Gaza, which is part of an international flotilla scheduled to sail to Gaza in the next few days. This complaint, its origin still unknown to the Americans, claimed that the boat is “not seaworthy” and therefore requires a detailed inspection. On June 25 a police order declared that until the complaint is resolved the boat will not be permitted to leave.

[Is] Israel, which has extensive economic trade and investments in Greece…using its clout to pressure the Greek government…[Or is] the Obama Administration…using U.S. leverage at the IMF to compel the Greek authorities to stop the U.S. boat from leaving Greece.  Greece’s economic and political crisis is a result of extreme austerity measures imposed by the European Union and the largely U.S.-controlled International Monetary Fund…

As I’ve written here, Israel is known for using economic clout and blandishments to induce other states to do its bidding.  An Israeli source confirmed to me that Ukraine had agreed to the extraordinary rendition of Dirar Abusisi in return for various trade pacts and lobbying help and access in Washington DC.  Some are speculating that Israel might’ve agreed to lobby various European countries on behalf of Turkey’s candidacy for the EU in return for that country pulling the plug on its own contingent in the Gaza Flotilla.

Greece of course is stuck in a particular bind because it is hanging by a hair economically.  It doesn’t need the distraction of Israeli threats to its further damage its economy should it allow the U.S. boat to depart for Gaza.  It seems that at least in this particular matter, Israel and the U.S. have Greece by the short hairs and the Gaza Flotilla suffers the consequences of such bad timing.

Israel is attempting to play hardball by threatening international journalists covering the Flotilla with a ten year ban from entering the country and confiscation (that is, “theft”) of their equipment.  I’m wondering what they plan to do with the journalists like Amira Hass, Joseph Dana and Mya Guarnieri, who are Israeli citizens covering the trip.  Maybe they will ban them from their own country a la apartheid era South Africa or Soviet Russia?

Lest Israel crow about its victory, it should be remembered that generally Israel’s timing is pretty bad on similar matters and that the next time it gets into a similar scrape there may be others qvelling from the pain Israel inflicts on itself.

There is a saying I think I remember Bobby Kennedy using in his speeches about racial injustice: “Justice delayed in justice denied.”  In the case of the flotilla, even if the Israelis and Obama administration succeed by subterfuge to frustrate the aims of the Flotilla, they have not excused the fundamental injustice of the Gaza siege and Israel’s overall policy toward Palestine.  The nasty boil remains on the body politic.  Refusing the aggressive treatment offered by the Flotilla doesn’t conceal the fact that the Occupation and siege are part of a terrible illness that afflicts Israel.  The illness won’t go away.  It remains for all to see.  The Israelis will happily point to their success in cancelling the sailing of Hope.  But what sort of victory have they won?  At best, it’s Pyrrhic.

Show your support for the brave Flotilla activists and your opposition to the empty threats and lies of the U.S. and Israeli governments.  Make a donation to support the cause.  A friend of this blog, Mary Hughes Thompson sails on the Canadian boat, Tahrir.  You may support it here.

Ukraine: Not Ready for Prime Time or 2012 Euro Cup

Friday, March 18th, 2011

euro2012 logoUkraine will be co-hosting the next European Cup soccer championship in 2012.  As part of the build-up to this momentous event, it is organizing a mega-million advertising campaign promoting Ukrainian tourism throughout the world.  I’ve even heard of “Ukraine–All About U” promotions as far aways as India. Ukraine also sees tourism with Israel as a major opportunity because there are many former Ukrainian Jews living in Israel, and Ukraine, as the cradle of Hasidism, includes major pilgrimage sites for Orthodox Jews to the graves of such luminaries as the Berditchever and Bratslaver rebbes and the Baal Shem Tov, founder of the movement.  I myself visited these sites and saw how many Orthodox Jews from Israel and the Diaspora were drawn there.

This is why Ukraine still has interest in joining NATO and just signed a protocol with Israel ending the need for visas for mutual travel.  On his current visit to Israel, Prime Minister Azarov emphasized his country’s interest in signing a Free Trade agreement with Israel that would create a duty-free zone for products and services between the nations.  As part of this expansion of trade, there would also be an expansion of security and military cooperation of the sort that characterized Ukraine’s presumed participation in the abduction of Palestinian civil engineer Dirar Abusisi on a train in Poltava on the night of February 18th.  Abusisi was later transferred to Mossad custody, flown out of Ukraine to Israel, and imprisoned in a Shin Bet interrogation chamber within hours of being spiriting off that train.

One might also presume that Ukraine would love to get its hands on some of that advanced weaponry, missile systems, and high-tech security applications developed by Israel’s weapons industry.  A free trade agreement would go a long way toward satisfying Ukraine’s appetites for these new toys for its military.

In fact, I’d lay money on the fact that there was either a tacit or explicit quid pro quo between Israel and Ukraine for securing the FTA and that the rendition of Abusisi was part or all of the latter’s payment for the transaction to be completed.

Unfortunately for Ukraine, and even more for those it is attempting to draw to the championship games, the nation is not ready for prime time.  First, Ukraine is a country now in the grip of a pro-Russian strongman style government more in the Soviet/Putin style than that of the Orange Revolution.  Second, is a country where trade and security come before human rights.  Where indeed human rights exists only as a concept honored in the breach if at all.  Third, there is a huge trade in illicit weapons, drugs and even human trafficking.  The European Union pays Ukraine hundreds of millions to wage a fight against the latter major crimes.

I’ve had a in-depth conversation with an American in Ukraine who specializes in immigration, human rights, and refugee issues there.  He gave me quite an education.   There really is no such thing as refugee protection in Ukraine.  If you are fleeing from persecution suffered in a former Soviet Republic like Uzbekistan or Russia, you have no protections inside Ukraine.  Upon entering that country, you may be beaten by immigration authorities.  You may be arrested even as you enter a government ministry where you are about to apply for residency and refugee status.  Take a look at this website established by Ukrainian human rights lawyers to see evidence of what I’m saying.

This is why Dirar Abusisi’s case is so important in the context of Ukraine’s push for international recognition.  Why should the world welcome Ukraine on the world stage and allow it to exit the orbit of Russia as a former Soviet satellite, when it can’t respect the norms honored by other western democracies?  Dirar Abusisi followed the rules as laid out by Ukraine.  He went to the ministry to proffer his papers to apply for citizenship, since he wished to bring his country from Gaza to a place where he hoped they might have a better life (he is also married to a Ukranian national).  And how was he repaid for following the rules as laid out by Ukrainian authorities themselves?  He was kidnapped either directly or indirectly by a third nation whose agents were operating in Ukraine with the apparent tacit or explicit assent of Ukrainian security agents.  Then he was flown into captivity by those Israeli Mossad operatives.

What message does this send to the thousands of refugees fleeing war, conflict, or persecution in other countries who find themselves in Ukraine?  It tells them that this place is a free-fire zone for political refugees or dissidents.  It tells them that if the Ukrainian secret police don’t get you first, your native security services will.  And they might even do it inside Ukraine.

An Israeli TV news reporter recently broadcast an unsubstantiated rumor offered to him no doubt by the IDF that the ship recently seized by Israel allegedly containing Iranian arms allegedly destined for Gaza was organized by a company in Odessa.  He also hinted that Abusisi may’ve been connected to this venture.  What would be especially wild about this story if any of it was accurate (and keep in mind very well none of it may turn out true) is that Ukraine is the kind of place where a company can plot the transfer of tens of millions in advanced weapons systems to so-called terrorist states, while Ukraine also collaborates with the nation that would allegedly be victimized by these weapons in illegally seizing a citizen of a third state who might’ve been organizing the weapons deal.  ”What a country,” as Yaakov Smirnoff used to say.

Does this sound like a country that’s ready to play soccer or anything else upon the world stage?  Ukraine has a LONG way to go.  It might start by making a full accounting of what happened to Dirar Abusisi.  Who snatched him?  Why?  Who did they give him to?  What happened to him?  Why didn’t Ukraine do anything to protect him?  What did Ukraine get in return for its cooperation?

EU Lays Basis for Sanctions Against Israel

Monday, January 10th, 2011

In late Apartheid-era South Africa, the momentum among the international community shifted inexorably toward toppling the discriminatory system.  Crippling sanctions took their toll on the country’s economy and psyche.  While the white regime clung desperately to power, finally a spark of realism emerged within the ruling party which allowed the rise of a leader like F.W. de Klerk, who negotiated a peaceful transition to democracy and majority rule.

In the past few months, a similar process has emerged outside Israel with multiple Latin American nations (the latest being Chile) recognizing a Palestinian state within 1967 borders. Now, Haaretz reports on a sensitive new EU report drafted by consuls general in Jerusalem and Ramallah which would lay the groundwork for a possible EU sanctions regime against Israel as long as it continues the Occupation and rejects a Palestinian state.

Among the recommendations:

1. a boycott of all Israeli products, services and businesses operating outside the Green Line including East Jerusalem

2. refusal to attend meetings with Israeli officials outside the Green Line (including East Jerusalem)

3. creating a settler black list forbidding entry to EU countries of those suspected of committing violent acts against Palestinians

4. discouraging citizens of EU countries (most likely directed at European Jews) from purchasing property in East Jerusalem

Returning to the South African analogy, the chief difference is that there seems to be no realism whatsoever within the Israeli political system nor any moderate or pragmatic leader capable of being the Israeli de Klerk.  In that event, it seems that Israel’s future is deeply clouded.  Without political leadership, and with the gathering storm of opprobrium against the Occupation and denial of Palestinian national rights, it seems something has to give.  It could be an international diktat jointly negotiated by the U.S., EU, and Quartet compelling Israel to yield.  Or it could take some other form.  But it appears more and more likely that Israel simply cannot come to terms with what it must do and that the rest of the world must help or even force Israel to get where it needs to be so that both that country and the rest of the region can find stability and peace.

Israel Deigns to Allow UN Secretary General into Gaza

Monday, March 8th, 2010

Pro-Israel hasbarists are fond of arguing that Israel withdrew from Gaza in 2004 and doesn’t occupy it.  This usually goes hand in hand with the argument that Hamas fighters who rocket southern Israel have no justification for doing so since Israel gave up any territorial claim in Gaza in 2004.  In other words, the only possible reason for Hamas to attack Israel is to pursue its exterminationist vision of eliminating the Jewish state.

For anyone who’s ever entertained this pro-Israel argument in their own mind read this:

Israel has agreed to grant United Nations secretary general and the European Union’s foreign policy commissioner entry visas into the Gaza Strip, the first time it has acceded to such a request from international officials since Operation Cast Lead in December 2008.

The Foreign Ministry announced on Monday that the two unusual entry permits were granted to the United Nations Secretary General Ban Ki-moon and the European Union’s foreign policy commissioner Catherine Ashton.

“In response to the unique requested submitted by the UN chief, Mr. Ban Ki-moon, and the EU Foreign Policy commissioner, Lady Catherine Ashton, Israel has decided to permit their entrance into the Gaza Strip for close inspection of humanitarian aide work,” the Ministry’s statement wrote.

If Israel doesn’t control Gaza then how do you explain the fact that it refuses to allow free access to it?  Not only as august international leaders as Ban Ki Moon and others are usually denied access.  Even Israeli journalists cannot cover Gaza and it is a crime for ordinary Israeli to travel there as Jeff Halper discovered when he was arrested for doing so.  International peace activists have to sail ships there evading violent maneuvers of the Israeli navy.

For those of you who are a tad cynical about Israel’s motives in doing any ostensibly good deed, the MFA doesn’t disappoint on this one either:

The reason for the unusual permits is reportedly to ease the international pressure on Israel relating to blockade on the Gaza Strip.

Got that?  This is yet another pure hasbara move so that Israel can turn around the next time anyone complains about how badly it is treating the Gazans and say: “but we ARE concerned, why else would we let Ban and Lady Ashton in to see the UN’s good works there.”

The next time there’s a major disaster in a Third World country like Haiti, I wish Israel would send the team to Gaza instead if it truly had any humanitarian motivation.  The truth is that Israel understands the suffering of those who live far away and with whom it never has to live or deal.  Those who live next door are another story.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Was ‘Hijacked’ Russian Ship Intercepted by Mossad, Carrying Missiles to Iran?

Friday, September 4th, 2009
The Arctic Sea after its liberation by Russian navy

The Arctic Sea after its "liberation" by Russian navy

The case of the ship Russia claims was hijacked on its way to deliver lumber from Finland to Algeria is becoming curiouser and curiouser.  First, one has to wonder how a ship can be hijacked in a place where none has been hijacked since the days of the Vikings.  Second, the EU rapporteur for marine piracy, an Estonian admiral, said it was likely the ship had been intercepted by the Mossad, a claim also made by Russian media sources.  Third, the Russian ambassador to the EU, no friend of Estonia or Estonian admirals, told the rapporteur in the bracing Russian colloquial equivalent–shut your pie hole.  Fourth, Time Magazine’s Russian correspondent has added to this story of spookish intrigue revealing new, previously unpeeled layers of the onion.

The Russian government, which strangely ended the hijacking without firing a shot, claims the ship Arctic Sea was hijacked two days out of port.  Its tracking device was supposedly disabled by the hijackers.  It’s unclear what the hijackers expected to find when the Russians claim there was only $2 million worth of lumber aboard.

One has to ask how and why a ship disappears in European waters for four weeks; why no one could locate it (though the Russians later claimed they knew where it was all along); why no crew member set off a distress signal even before the hijackers boarded; and why it was found near the Azores, hundreds of miles from where it was supposed to be.

The EU’s Admiral Kouts has offered perhaps the most convincing hypothesis thus far:

In an interview with TIME, he says only a shipment of missiles could account for Russia’s bizarre behavior throughout the month-long saga. “There is the idea that there were missiles aboard, and one can’t explain this situation in any other way,” he says. “As a sailor with years of experience, I can tell you that the official versions are not realistic.” Kouts says an Israeli interception of the cargo is the most likely explanation.

Following on this claim, is the strange and suggestive fact that Israeli president (and former intelligence master) Shimon Peres, made a surprise to visit to Russia precisely one day after the ship was “rescued.”  Might it be possible that Peres went to avert a major crisis in bilateral relations after the Mossad assaulted a Russian ship on the high seas; and that he and Russia’s Medvedev were getting their stories straight for the world media?

Time’s story also raises some other intriguing questions:

There are also questions surrounding the Arctic Sea‘s rescue. On orders from the Kremlin, Defense Minister Anatoly Serdyukov sent a completely disproportionate force, including destroyers and submarines, to look for the vessel. It took five days for them to find it, the Defense Ministry said, even though the Foreign Ministry later announced that it was fully aware of the Arctic Sea‘s coordinates the entire time. To fly the alleged pirates and the crew back to Moscow — a group of only 19 men — Russia dispatched two enormous military-cargo planes. And then on their arrival, the ship’s crew was detained along with the alleged hijackers for days of questioning, with no access to their families or the media.

“Even from the basic facts, without assumptions, it is clear that this was not just piracy,” says Mikhail Voitenko, editor of the Russian maritime journal Sovfrakht, which has been tracking unusual incidents on the high seas for decades. “I’ve never seen anything like this. These are some of the most heavily policed waters in the world. You cannot just hide a ship there for weeks without government involvement.”

If the cargo was highly sophisticated military hardware intended for a Middle Eastern country like Iran (Hebrew only) or Hezbollah, who would have sent it?  Clearly, this would not be a rogue Russian operation (though if it is, it indicates that the Russian government has rather feeble control over rogue elements wishing to perpetrate such mischief).  Inyan Mercazi‘s article linked above argues for the rogue operation hypothesis.  In its favor, is the fact that both the supposed pirates and the original crew remain imprisoned and a brother of one of the hijackers told Estonian TV:

They went to find work and ended up in a political conflict. Now they are hostage to some kind of political game”?

The Israeli media source says the government and the Russian arms traffickers are caught in an “internal power struggle” which explains the imprisonment.

If the shipment was sanctioned by the government itself this would mean that the Russians are willing to sell Iran (or whichever nation was the ultimate destination) advanced weaponry though attempting to do so in secret.  It also means that Israel is willing to confront Russia by intercepting and possibly destroying or disabling the weaponry on the high seas.

If this is what the Mossad did, it would not be terribly surprising or out of character.  Israel has assassinated weapons experts trafficking with its enemies.  Its air force recently destroyed a Syrian facility which may or may not have been a North Korean nuclear reactor.  In 1981, of course, its air force destroyed Saddam Hussein’s nuclear plant in Osirak.  Boldly intercepting Russian weapons shipments on the high seas would also send a robust signal to one of Iran’s best friends that Israel is not willing to stand for any reinforcement of Iran’s offensive or defensive capabilities.

Though it does remain unclear to me how Israel expects its action will encourage Russia to sign on to draconian sanctions against Iran which it would be likely the UN Security Council would have to approve.  The sanctions program, as with Iran in 2002-3, is viewed by U.S. neocons, pro-Israel advocates, and Israeli officials as a necessary precursor to any possible military attack by Israel on Iran.  Israeli policy always seems curiously improvised, as if they hadn’t thought this far ahead as to how their immediate action will impact the chessboard in five or ten moves.

I seriously doubt we’ve heard the last of this story.

Lebanon Peacekeeping Mission Hits Major Snag

Sunday, August 20th, 2006

The NY Times reports that the UN’s Lebanon peacekeeping mission has run into major resistance from some of the European nations expected to contribute forces to it:

The shaky, United Nations-brokered cease-fire in Lebanon suffered another blow on Sunday when the European countries that had been called upon to provide the backbone of a peacekeeping force delayed a decision on committing troops until the mission is more clearly defined…

Haunted by their experiences in Bosnia in the 1990’s, when their forces were unable to stop widespread ethnic killing, European governments are insisting upon clarifying the chain of command and rules of engagement before plunging into the even greater complexities of the Middle East.

“In the past, when peacekeeping missions were not properly defined, we’ve seen major failures,’’ a spokeswoman for the French Foreign Ministry, Agnès Romatet-Espagne, said Sunday. “There are the bad memories of Bosnia. This time we want the answers beforehand, so we don’t come to the problems when they have happened.’’

In addition, a senior French official said, “Italy, Spain and Finland have raised the same questions as France has.” Following the usual diplomatic practice, the official asked not to be identified. A spokesman for the Spanish Foreign Ministry said Spain was willing to send troops, “but the rules have to be clarified and agreed on.”

It is hard to tell from these statements whether the Europeans see Hezbollah as the party for which they would need more permissive rules of engagement or Israel (or both).

The article notes that Israel’s failed commando raid in the Bekaa Valley may have contributed to the European feeling of malaise about the peacekeeping mission. And this statement from Israel’s prime minister should’ve added to their discomfort:

Israel’s prime minister, Ehud Olmert, told his cabinet on Sunday that he did not want countries that did not have diplomatic relations with Israel to participate in the force, according to an official in the prime minister’s office. Malaysia, Indonesia and Bangladesh are among the countries that have offered frontline troops but have no diplomatic ties with Israel.

It is preposterous that Israel feels it can dictate the make-up of an entire peacekeeping operation taking place on Lebanese soil by vetoing essentially any contribution by Muslim nations (virtually none of whom recognize Israel). Should Lebanon also get such a power of ‘first refusal’ regarding which peacekeepers it feels comfortable accepting?

Rumors and confusion continue to swirl around the IDF commando raid near Baalbek:

Speculation abounded in the Israeli news media that the commandos were trying to free the two Israeli soldiers whose capture started the conflict, or to kill a Hezbollah leader. One such official, Sheik Muhammad Yazbeck, lives in the area where the operation took place.

The soldier killed was a Lieutenant Colonel, and one of the most senior officers in the Israeli version of the Special Forces (called Sayeret Matkal in Hebrew). Military sources told Haaretz that it was miraculous that the force, numbering about 100 troops, didn’t lose many more in the firefight:

Military sources told Haaretz that the two commando vehicles took heavy Hezbollah fire and that “we were really lucky the operation did not end with 10 commandos killed.”

All of this indicates to me that the group faced a disastrous end to its mission. The Israeli newspaper also indicates that military intelligence raised serious reservations about the group’s ability to remain undetected:

They added that the operation was approved by the political echelon and the General Staff, despite many reservations in the intelligence directorate and the unit itself regarding the chances of succeeding and not being discovered

If the soldiers participating in the operation had serious reservations about its success even before it got off the ground and the politicians and military brass overruled them, what does this say about the operational effectiveness and cohesion of the vaunted fighting machine?

The IDF, of course, has an entirely different explanation of the mission’s goal:

In Israel, it was widely assumed that the mission was considered highly important and involved something more than interdicting an effort to resupply Hezbollah with standard weaponry. Many of the reports in the Israeli news media centered on speculation that the raid was intended to gather intelligence or evidence about advanced, Russian-made weaponry sold to Syria and being sent into Lebanon for Hezbollah.

In an analysis in the newspaper Yediot Aharonot, Alex Fishman wrote that Hezbollah had been using advanced Soviet-made antitank weapons. More than 10 days ago, he wrote, a legal opinion was written by lawyers reviewing the United Nations-backed cease-fire agreement “stipulating unequivocally” that attacks on Hezbollah weaponry would be classified as “an act of defense.”

The latter statement is preposterous. A bunch of Israeli foreign ministry lawyers (I presume that’s who Fishman is referring to–though this is not made clear) get out their magnifying glasses and peruse the UN ceasefire resolution and somehow come up with the wild notion that interdicting Hezbollah’s weapons supply is kosher and “defensive” in nature according to the resolution’s language. This reminds me of John Yoo’s famous memo claiming that the Geneva Convention did not apply to our treatment of Arab terror suspects and that torture was somehow a legal form of interrogation. Speaking of torture, I think Yoo and those Israeli lawyers are the ones torturing, though they’re torturing language rather than people.

The Times quotes a journalist from Yediot Achronot pointing out the irony that the Israeli raid, which Kofi Annan and many others state violated the ceasefire, might have been intended to gather evidence against Syria and Hezbollah in order to bolster Israel’s claim that THEY are the parties doing the violating:

Some commentators described the raid as another black mark for the Israeli military, already under severe criticism for its conduct of the Lebanon war.

Writing in Yediot Aharonot, Amir Rappaport said, “The operation was intended to be absolutely secret and the mere fact that it was revealed and even claimed casualties is proof of its failure.

The skirmish between the commando troops and the Hezbollah fighters, which was not planned, also displays Israel to the world as though it violated the U.N. resolution. Absurdly enough, the mission that ran into trouble was also intended to allow Israel to provide proof later on that Syria, Hezbollah and Iran were not honoring the agreement.”

The ‘subtlety’ of such irony will surely be lost on the entirely humorless and obtuse Olmert and the IDF command.

European Union Busts Through Israeli Financial Siege of Palestinian Authority

Tuesday, February 28th, 2006

Israel, with the tacit backing of the U.S. has been tightening the noose around the Palestinian economy using the pretext of Hamas’ upcoming assumption of control of the Palestinian Authority. All I can say is thank God there are alternative international forces which aren’t bound by Israel and the U.S.’ draconian notions.

The NY Times notes that the EU has responded positively to James Wolfensohn’s urgent request (on behalf of the Quartet) for emergency funding to prevent the PA from imminent collapse:

After receiving a dire warning that the Palestinian Authority was so short of money that it might collapse in two weeks, the European Union on Monday offered $144 million in aid to the Palestinians before a Hamas government takes power.

The Europeans acted in partial response to a letter from James D. Wolfensohn, the special Middle East envoy of the so-called Quartet made up of the United States, the European Union, Russia and the United Nations.

Mr. Wolfensohn warned in a letter dated Saturday that “unless a solution is found, we may be facing the financial collapse of the P.A. within two weeks,” referring to the Palestinian Authority. The money from the European Union will not solve the Palestinian money crunch for very long, especially since most of it is not in cash, but it will ease the burden of repayments to suppliers.

And other nations have stepped up to the plate too:

…The Saudis have promised but not yet delivered $20 million for February, the Norwegians have promised another $10 million and Qatar has delivered $14 million, which has already gone to repay loans taken in January in anticipation of the donation.

Wolfensohn also notes the need to address the Palestinians’ long-term financing requirements so they will not have to beg each month for the funds to get them through the next month:

“If we do not want to see rising tension leading to violence and chaos,” Mr. Wolfensohn wrote, “we will have to develop urgently a convincing strategy addressing the P.A.’s financial and developmental needs not only in the short-term of the next few weeks but also in a longer time frame.” That includes the revenues withheld by Israel, he said, adding, “It cannot be in Israel’s interests to have a sharp deterioration of the economic and humanitarian situation next door.”

You’d think the sentiment in the last sentence of that paragraph would be self-evident to the Israelis. But they’ve never been ones to think in the broader or long-term context about the problems of their region. And as far as they’re concerned they live alone with no neighbors to speak of. At least, that’s they way they’d prefer it. But reality has a way of jumping and biting you in the ass when you try to maintain such a segregated existence.

The funding we’re speaking of is short-term financing which will only get the Palestinians through the coming weeks. Then it’s back to the drawing board. U.S. and Israeli policy only ensure that the Palestinians will continue to move from one crisis to the next. You might almost get the impression that both nations (though especially Israel) prefer it that way.

Performance Optimization WordPress Plugins by W3 EDGE