Mahzor

New York Public Library

Churches

Sarajevo Haggadah

Mah Nishtanah

Sarajevo haggadah

Antaea Darom

Israeli women's art

Action

Torah as music

Ben Heine

Action

ceramic bowl

Mohammad Said Kalash, "Offering Reconciliation" exhibit (photo: Ilan Amihai)

Action

Punch and Judy/Pinchas and Jamila

Avi Katz

Action

David Grossman

Ben Heine

Action

Eldrige Street shul

Lower East Side

Action

Dove

Ben Heine

Action

Two birds

Hoda Jamal

Action

Israeli and Palestinian boys

from documentary, Promises

Action

Cat in the Hat

Yiddish version

Action

Daylight through the Wall

Banksy: graffiti art on Separation Wall

Action

Maurice Sendak's Brundibar set

New Victory Theater (photo: Nan Melville/NYT)

Action

Daniel Barenboim, West-Eastern Divan Orchestra

Palestinian-Israeli musical ensemble (photo: Kerstin Joensson/AP)

Action

Great Day on Eldrige Street

N.Y.'s klezmer greats celebrate shul rededication (photo: Leo Sorel)

Action

Joint Appeal for Peace

(Avi Katz)

Joint Appeal for Peace

Ketubah, Ancona, Italy (1772)

(Jewish Theological Seminary library)

Ancona ketubah

Posts Tagged ‘dick-cheney’

Tuning Judith Miller Out

Tuesday, February 13th, 2007

Today’s NY Times notes that neither Scooter Libby nor Uber-President Cheney will testify at the trial. But the tidbit that caught my eye was this one:

Jill Abramson, managing editor of The New York Times, testified earlier on Tuesday that she could not remember a conversation with Ms. Miller after the July 8 meeting with Mr. Libby. Ms. Miller had testified earlier in the trial that she had suggested to Ms. Abramson that day that The Times assign someone to look into the role of the Wilsons.

Ms. Abramson, who was on the witness stand for less than five minutes, said, “It’s possible I occasionally tuned her out,” but said she had no recollection of the conversation.

Can’t imagine why anyone would want to tune that one out, can you??

Dick Cheney and Herbert Hoover, One Thing in Common

Saturday, January 27th, 2007

From today’s Maureen Dowd column, Daffy Does Doom (TimesSelect required):

Delusional is far too mild a word to describe Dick Cheney. Delusional doesn’t begin to capture the profound, transcendental one-flew-over daftness of the man.

Has anyone in the history of the United States ever been so singularly wrong and misguided about such phenomenally important events and continued to insist he’s right in the face of overwhelming evidence to the contrary?

Yes, Herbert Hoover. But the difference is that Herbert Hoover was a moderate Republican who actually cared about the people whom the Depression dispossessed. He just didn’t have a clue what to do about it. Cheney doesn’t even have that (being moderate or caring about the victims of his policies) in his favor. But he does share with Hoover the fact that he has no clue about how to deal with his ‘Great Depression,’ Iraq.

And I also ‘enjoyed’ this quotation from a Cheney interview with Wolf Blitzer about U.S. ‘successes’ in Iraq:

“Bottom line,” Vice told Wolf, “is that we’ve had enormous successes, and we will continue to have enormous successes.”

You bet. If you label 3,000+ American-and hundreds of thousands of Iraqi deaths as “enormous successes.”

Cheney Calls November Election Loss Little More Than Opinion Poll

Saturday, January 20th, 2007

Dick Cheney is different than you or me (to paraphrase Fitzgerald). He marches to a different drummer. Like one wearing the insignia of a Roman legion. How else to describe Cheney’s comment to Chris Wallace that the November election was nothing more than a popularity poll which can safely be ignored:

“WALLACE: I want to ask you one more question about this, and then we’ll talk about other issues. Iraq was a big issue in the November election. I want you to take a look at some numbers from the election. According to the National Exit Poll, 67 percent said the war was either very or extremely important to their vote, and only 17 percent supported sending in more troops.

By taking the policy you have, haven’t you, Mr. Vice President, ignored the express will of the American people in the November election?

CHENEY: Well, Chris, this president, and I don’t think any president worth his salt, can afford to make decisions of this magnitude according to the polls. The polls change day by day…

WALLACE: Well, this was an election, sir.

CHENEY: Polls change day by day, week by week. I think the vast majority of Americans want the right outcome in Iraq. The challenge for us is to be able to provide that. But you cannot simply stick your finger up in the wind and say, “Gee, public opinion’s against; we’d better quit.”"

Hasn’t anyone ever told the guy that an election, unlike an opinion poll, actually decides things? Like who’s in power? And that if you lose an election it means a lot more than “sticking your finger up in the wind.” It means you’re gone, you’re history. Most presidents hearing such a verdict would change course. If not for themselves and their legacy, then at least for their fellow party members who hope to follow them into office someday.

Cheney’s motto is: “Democracy, I don’t need no stinkin’ democracy.” All he needs is a few Roman legions at his disposal. Then he’d ride their horses up the Capitol steps to announce he’s appointed himself emperor. Then he’d turn the floor of the Senate into a stable like one of the Roman emperors did. Elections, fuck ‘em (to paraphrase his famous bon mot to Patrick Leahy).

Hat tip to Dahlia Khalifa.

Cheney Kept Abreast of Secret Syria-Israel Talks; U.S. Held Secret Talks With Hamas, Hezbollah

Wednesday, January 17th, 2007

While everyone and their brother seems to be falling all over themselves to deny, deny, deny that such talks took place, Akiva Eldar, who broke the original story, has kept pace by breaking new ground yet again. He reports in today’s Haaretz that both senior U.S. officials and the negotiators themselves confirm that officials as high as Dick Cheney were kept informed of developments in their meetings:

Senior American government officials received regular reports of the secret meetings that took place in Europe between a former Israeli official and a Syrian representative, Haaretz has learned.

Senior officials in Washington told Haaretz that U.S. Vice President Dick Cheney was kept in the picture about these indirect talks between Syria and Israel.

Eldar also reveals the rather astonishing news (take that, Woodward) that former CIA officers participated in direct talks with Hamas and Hezbollah officials aimed at plumbing the possibility of change in both the two militant organizations’ positions and in U.S. policy toward them:

Geoffrey Aronson, of the Washington-based Foundation for Middle East Peace, who helped arrange the secret meetings, also participated last year in meetings organized by Alastair Crooke, the European Union’s former security envoy to the territories, with key Hamas and Hezbollah members.

These meetings, which took place in Beirut, were also attended by two former senior Central Intelligence Agency officials. Haaretz reported at the time that Cheney also know about the existence of these meetings, and received regular reports from the American participants.

Of course, given that Dick Cheney seems to have been riding herd over these projects is it any wonder that they don’t seem to have led anywhere? Can Dick Cheney have ever had any interest in changing U.S. policy toward Hamas, Hezbollah or Syria?? More likely, he wanted to know the substance of the talks merely so he would know how to discredit them more decisively.

Despite denials from senior officials in the prime minister’s office, Eldar presents more persuasive evidence that Olmert and staff knew full well what was going on:

Meretz-Yahad Chairman Yossi Beilin said in media interviews Tuesday that the European mediator in the secret talks was Nicholas Lang, head of the Middle East desk at the Swiss Foreign Ministry.

Lang also played a key role in organizing the Israeli-Palestinian meetings at which Beilin and Yasser Abed Rabbo drafted the Geneva Initiative, their proposal for a final-status agreement between Israel and the Palestinians. Liel, who was the driving force behind the secret meetings with Suleiman, is one of the people closest to Beilin.

Raviv Drucker, of Channel 10 television, reported last night that Lang met not long ago with Shalom Turjeman, Ehud Olmert’s political adviser, and presented him with the draft. According to Drucker, Turjeman told Lang that Israel has no interest in the understandings. Drucker also said that Lang visited Damascus several times during the talks, met with Syrian FM Farouk Shara, and reported that he believed the Syrian leadership genuinely wanted a deal.

“Israel had no interest in the understandings.” Where have we heard that one before? Remember when Olmert for weeks during the war had no interest in a Lebanon ceasefire (until he did)? Remember for months when he had no interest in meeting with Abbas (till he did at Condi’s urging)? Remember when Olmert had no interest in holding peace talks with Abbas (he never has)? “Never missed an opportunity to miss an opportunity.” That should be written on his headstone.

The passage quoted above makes clearer why Olmert ran from this project as fast as his feet would carry him. It was the baby of Yossi Beilin, that confirmed ‘peacenik’ and leader of the dovish Meretz party. Why in heavens name would Olmert have any interest in promoting or supporting a Syrian version of the Geneva Initiative? Why? And give those “leftist peaceniks” a chance to crow that they made peace where he couldn’t (or wouldn’t)? He’d have to have been a fool to play into Beilin’s hands, right? I guess that’s the way a cynical player of the political power game would view it. But a statesman wouldn’t have viewed it that way. But Israel hasn’t seen a statesman in office since Rabin was murdered. It may not see another for quite some time. Ugh, I have a headache!

Mission Accomplished! Democrats Take Back House and Senate

Wednesday, November 8th, 2006
bush mission accomplishedMission Accomplished, my ass Mr. President

I just had to write that headline! It gives me oh so much pleasure to stick that shiv into Bush since he used it so long against Dems in trying to prop up this lousy war.

But to be fair, I have to acknowledge I’m writing this at 1AM PST and, while it appears that Webb has won Virginia and McCaskill Missouri, Jon Tester’s lead has diminished considerably over the course of the evening and as I write this he leads by something like 3,500 votes with only 82% counted. That could be a nail-biter. Plus, I understand there are absentee ballots to count in the Virginia race. But I still think Dems have an excellent shot at taking the Senate.

democratic supporters celebrate house victoryDems celebrate majority control of House (credit: Getty)

It’s pretty clear that Bush does not have the political resilience to do a Clinton after 1994 and recalibrate his political strategy. He just doesn’t have the wit or guile to do that. So we will have a president who will continue to live in denial about the decline of his power. Oh God how it pleases me to write that. And Dick Cheney will become a chained bulldog. Ditto on how I enjoy writing that too. If the Repubs were smart they’d bundle Dick up in an overcoat & shove him into a car and take him to some secure location for the remainder of the Bush presidency. That guy’s going to be radioactive in the next two years. Oh and last but not least, poor Karl. To go out like this in such a fizzle. It’s gotta hurt. I HOPE IT DOES! LOTS!

claire mccaskill celebrates senate election victoryClaire McCaskill celebrates Missouri Senate victory (credit: Huy Richard Mach/St. Louis Post-Dispatch)

Remember that recent crack of Bush’s about how when he gets really sad and lonely out there in the big bad Beltway cesspool, he likes to use Google Earth to take a look at the ranch and think how he’d like to be there. Oh how I’ll look forward to sending him there come 2008. It’ll be worth the wait to look at his crestfallen mug at the Inauguration of a Democratic president. The shame, the horror. How will he live it down? Of course, there’s a small matter of an election to win before we get there. But hey, I can dream.

Doesn’t this outcome make Charlie Crist, running for Florida governor, look prescient in refusing to be seen with Bush on the final day of the campaign? That was one of the delightful bits of news yesterday. Bush plans a FL. campaign trip solely to bolster Crist and the latter is the one who asked him to do it. And what does Crist do? He not only stiffs Bush, but he does it by joining John McCain at another rally! And guess who won the governor’s race? You guessed it, Crist. Smart guy.

We will have a Democratic party with very frail majorities and wanting to be extremely careful about not rocking the boat too hard, or rubbing the Repubs noses in their loss. I don’t see the Dems coming up with a bold centrist policy though I wish they could. The Congressional Republicans will be the wildcard here. Will they finally get some gumption and try to cobble together coalitions with Dems on a few discreet, major issues to get something done? Or will they follow the likely Bush path of obstructionism?

I’m heartened to hear that John Murtha will run for majority leader. He will be good for Dems on the Iraq issue.

The most important House race here is WA-08 in which Darcy Burner challenged Dave Reichert. The latter’s been ahead all night by 4% but the media’s still calling it “too close to call” with 40% of the vote counted. Hang in there Darcy! Wish I could’ve voted for you.

Waterboarding ‘No Brainer’ for Cheney–But ‘We Don’t Torture’

Friday, October 27th, 2006

Mr. Cheney was interviewed Tuesday by Scott Hennen, a conservative radio talk show host in Fargo, N.D. “Would you agree that a dunk in water is a no-brainer if it can save lives?” Mr. Hennen asked.

“Well, it’s a no-brainer for me,” Mr. Cheney replied. “But for a while there I was criticized as being the vice president for torture. We don’t torture. That’s not what we’re involved in.”

Tony Snow, the White House spokesman, said Mr. Cheney was not endorsing water-boarding, a coercive interrogation technique that simulates drowning and that many have said qualifies as torture. Mr. Snow said Mr. Cheney was not, in fact, referring to any technique, whether it was torture or not, because administration officials do not discuss interrogation methods…

Mr. Snow, who spent much of his day dealing with questions about the comments, told reporters that none of them related to interrogation techniques, which are classified. “I’m telling you what the vice president’s view is, which is it wasn’t about waterboarding. Period,” he said…

Mr. Snow said Mr. Cheney is not someone who slips up. One reporter noted that the vice president had once…shot a friend in the face during a hunting accident last February.
NY Times

PETRUCHIO
I say it is the moon that shines so bright.

KATHARINA
I know it is the sun that shines so bright.

PETRUCHIO
Now, by my mother’s son, and that’s myself,
It shall be moon, or star, or what I list,
Or ere I journey to your father’s house.
Go on, and fetch our horses back again.
Evermore cross’d and cross’d; nothing but cross’d!

HORTENSIO
Say as he says, or we shall never go.

KATHARINA
Forward, I pray, since we have come so far,
And be it moon, or sun, or what you please:
An if you please to call it a rush-candle,
Henceforth I vow it shall be so for me.

PETRUCHIO
I say it is the moon.

KATHARINA
I know it is the moon.

PETRUCHIO
Nay, then you lie: it is the blessed sun.

KATHARINA
Then, God be bless’d, it is the blessed sun:
But sun it is not, when you say it is not;
And the moon changes even as your mind.
What you will have it named, even that it is;

And so it shall be so for Katharina.
Taming of the Shrew, Act 4, scene v

So let’s get this straight: a “dunk in water” is a “no-brainer,” but it’s also not torture because that’s just not the kind of folk we are. This Cheneyism also puts me in mind of Humpty Dumpty in Alice in Wonderland who tells the heroine that a word means precisely what he wants it to, no more and no less.

This is the Bush folk approach to unpleasant realities. They define them as they wish and according to what is most convenient at the moment one of them speaks. The more of this bestial bedevilment of our language and twisting of reality I hear, the greater will be my delight at the drubbing of historic proportions (Republican consultant Stu Rothenberg used that term, not I) I’m anticipating come November 7th. If Cheney is “not someone who slips up,” he’s got a whale of a surprise in store in two weeks. It’ll be one of his biggest slip-ups of his life.

Citizens: Approach Emperor Cheney at Your Peril

Wednesday, October 4th, 2006

A Colorado man was walking through a shopping center at the Beaver Creek Resort in Colorado when he saw Dick Cheney shopping. He walked over to him and gave him a piece of his mind (but civilly) about the war in Iraq. Then he walked away. That was the beginning of his troubles. Some time later he walked back past the spot where he’d met Cheney when all of a sudden a Secret Service agent put the cuffs on him:

…Steven Howards, an environmental consultant who lives in Golden, Colo., says he stepped up to the vice president to speak his mind in a public place and found himself in handcuffs — in violation, the suit says, of the Constitution’s language about free speech and illegal search and seizure.

…Mr. Howards, 54…was taking his 8-year-old son to a piano lesson on June 16 at the Beaver Creek Resort about two hours west of Denver when he saw Mr. Cheney at an outdoor mall. Mr. Howards said he approached within two feet of Mr. Cheney and said in a calm voice, “I think your policies in Iraq are reprehensible,” or as the lawsuit itself describes the encounter, “words to that effect.”

Mr. Howards said he then went on his way. About 10 minutes later, he said, he was walking back through the area when Agent Reichle handcuffed him and said he would be charged with assaulting the vice president. Local police officers, acting on information from the Secret Service, according to the suit, ultimately filed misdemeanor harassment charges that could have resulted in up to a year in jail.

It seems that Howards didn’t realize that Dick was an emperor who could only be approached by invitation. Seems that our elected officials don’t believe the American public has a right to approach them to speak their mind. If telling a politician to his face that he’s wrong constitutes criminal harassment then I’m not living in the country I thought I was living in. This should be called the Austro-Cheney empire and the vice president should be hailed by his subject as Emperor Dick. All hail!

Get the Secret Service’s justification for the charges against Howard:

…A spokesman for the Secret Service, Eric Zahren, as saying that Mr. Howards “wasn’t acting like other folks in the area,” and that he became “argumentative and combative” when agents tried to question him. Mr. Howards said Tuesday that he was never threatening and did not become upset until his arrest.

“This was not about anything I did — this is about what I said,” he said.

Sure Howards wasn’t “acting like other folks in the area,” they either didn’t have a clue who Cheney was or they didn’t want to experience the world of pain that was coming to Howards due to his sheer effrontery in thinking he should be allowed to petition a government official for redress of a grievance. Howards wasn’t acting like others because he was acting like a red-blooded American citizen executing his constitutional rights. I suppose Howards wouldn’t have gotten into as much trouble if, on seeing Cheney, he had approached on bended knee and begged his liege’s indulgence for a word.

I also like the justification provided for the arrest indicating that Howards became “argumentative and combative.” You would too if your constitutional rights were being trampled by a federal agent. If someone violates my rights do I shut up and take it or do I protest vigorously? I don’t know about you but I wouldn’t take something like that lying down.

The local District Attorney, though he threw the charges out, came out with some clunkers too:

A state judge dismissed the charge about three weeks later at the request of the Eagle County district attorney, Mark Hurlbert.

“It was our understanding that the vice president did not want to prosecute,” Mr. Hurlbert said in a telephone interview. “The original indication was that he had pushed the vice president. Later it looked to be that he had just spoken to him.”

Mr. Hurlbert said the initial information on the incident came from the Secret Service agents at Beaver Creek. A later communication from Mr. Cheney’s office or the Secret Service — Mr. Hurlbert said he did not remember which — said the government wanted to drop the matter.

So the Secret Service lied and said that Howards had pushed the VP. Does that tell you anything about how our Secret Service is serving the political needs of our heads of empire (er, State) rather than merely protecting them as they are constitutionally charged to do. Frankly, I love the fact that Howards is suing the Secret Service agent who arrested him. That many teach the man a thing or two about individual liberty in this country. That is, if the courts don’t buckle under the weight of the royal prerogative.

I love the comment “the government wanted to drop the matter.” I’ll bet they did. Wouldn’t look too good just before the Congressional elections for a guy taking his 8-year old to a piano lesson to end up in prison because he spoke to the VP for 30 seconds in a mall. I dearly wish Cheney had pressed charges. It would’ve made a lovely case with which to batter the Republicans about the head in the run up to November (though there are a few of those already making the rounds anyway).

Kristol, Cheney and Ghosts of Regime Change Past

Tuesday, July 18th, 2006

I’ve written my own critique of Bill Kristol’s It’s Our War, in which he posits that Israel’s war against Hezbollah should be but the first step in a long march toward regime change in Iran. Madison Guy of Letters from Nowhere pointed me to a telling speech delivered by Dick Cheney to the Veterans of Foreign Wars in 2002, which laid the groundwork for war in Iraq. His comments about “regime change” regarding that country ring ominously true after reading Kristol’s “call to arms” against Iran. Who doesn’t read this and weep a little at how utterly delusional and bereft of sense and reason it was:

Another argument [against going to war with Iraq] holds that opposing Saddam Hussein would cause even greater troubles in that part of the world, and interfere with the larger war against terror. I believe the opposite is true. Regime change in Iraq would bring about a number of benefits to the region. When the gravest of threats are eliminated, the freedom-loving peoples of the region will have a chance to promote the values that can bring lasting peace. As for the reaction of the Arab “street,” the Middle East expert Professor Fouad Ajami predicts that after liberation, the streets in Basra and Baghdad are “sure to erupt in joy in the same way the throngs in Kabul greeted the Americans.” Extremists in the region would have to rethink their strategy of Jihad. Moderates throughout the region would take heart. And our ability to advance the Israeli-Palestinian peace process would be enhanced, just as it was following the liberation of Kuwait in 1991.

The nutjob actually believed that war with Iraq would LESSEN the troubles of the region. Then there’s the quotation from Fouad Ajami about Iraqis erupting in joy at their American liberators. That crackpot should hide his head in shame instead of raking in the bucks as a talking head analyst for cable news. How ’bout those “extremists” who’d have to “rethink their strategy of Jihad.” If they did rethink anything it merely reaffirmed and strengthened their determination to kill as many Americans as they could. And where are those Arab moderates taking heart? Probably in a bomb shelter somewhere as the bullets, fired by sectarian militants stirred up by Cheney’s adventurist foreign policy, whizz by their heads.

But of course the laughingest and bitterest laugh of all is reserved for the last sentence in which he touts our enhanced “ability to advance the Israeli-Palestinian peace process.” Worked just like a charm didn’t it? Israel is sittin’ pretty. Peace is all around us. Oh, that must’ve been in Cheney’s alternate neocon universe.

All this is by way of warning that if anyone buys Kristol’s nostrums for solving the U.S.-Iran impasse, a few years from now someone like me is going to parse his stupidity and chuckle at all the people who had to die because some knucklehead thought he could impose some ridiculous neocon construct on an entire region.

Newt on Lebanon: ‘This is World War III’

And lest anyone say that Kristol is an army of one, Rightweb reports that Newt Gingrich told Meet the Press regarding the Lebanon conflict:

GINGRICH: …This is not the fifth day of the [Lebanon] war. This is the 58th year of the effort by those who want to destroy Israel. As Ahmadinejad, the head of Iran, says, he wants to defeat the Americans and eliminate Israel from the face of the earth. So we should not see this event in isolation. There is an Iran/Iraq/Syria—I mean, an Iran/Syria—was an Iraq before Saddam was replaced—Syria, Hezbollah and Hamas alliance trying to destroy Israel.

…This is absolutely a question of the survival of Israel, but it’s also a question of what is really a world war. Look what you’ve been covering: North Korea firing missiles. We say there’ll be consequences, there are none. The North Koreans fire seven missiles on our Fourth of July; bombs going off in Mumbai, India; a war in Afghanistan with sanctuaries in Pakistan. As I said a minute ago, the, the Iran/Syria/Hamas/Hezbollah alliance. A war in Iraq funded largely from Saudi Arabia and supplied largely from Syria and Iran. The British home secretary saying that there are 20 terrorist groups with 1200 terrorists in Britain. Seven people in Miami videotaped pledging allegiance to al-Qaeda, and 18 people in Canada being picked up with twice the explosives that were used in Oklahoma City, with an explicit threat to bomb the Canadian parliament, and saying they’d like to behead the Canadian prime minister. And finally, in New York City, reports that in three different countries people were plotting to destroy the tunnels of New York.

I mean, we, we are in the early stages of what I would describe as the third world war

RUSSERT: This is World War III?

GINGRICH: I believe if you take all the countries I just listed that you’ve been covering, put them on a map, look at all the different connectivity, you have to say to yourself: this is, in fact, World War III.

And he ain’t talkin’ ’bout Nazis or Commies either. He’s talking about a global war against Islamists and jihadis. ‘World War III!’ Wake up and smell the coffee people. These neocons are certifiable, dangerous lunatics who are ready to take us to full-scale war because of some hysterical notion that Islamists want to–and even more importantly–have the capacity to destroy our way of life. Somebody’s got to put a stop to this. I just hope it’s at the ballot box in November.

Performance Optimization WordPress Plugins by W3 EDGE