Mahzor

New York Public Library

Churches

Sarajevo Haggadah

Mah Nishtanah

Sarajevo haggadah

Antaea Darom

Israeli women's art

Action

Torah as music

Ben Heine

Action

ceramic bowl

Mohammad Said Kalash, "Offering Reconciliation" exhibit (photo: Ilan Amihai)

Action

Punch and Judy/Pinchas and Jamila

Avi Katz

Action

David Grossman

Ben Heine

Action

Eldrige Street shul

Lower East Side

Action

Dove

Ben Heine

Action

Two birds

Hoda Jamal

Action

Israeli and Palestinian boys

from documentary, Promises

Action

Cat in the Hat

Yiddish version

Action

Daylight through the Wall

Banksy: graffiti art on Separation Wall

Action

Maurice Sendak's Brundibar set

New Victory Theater (photo: Nan Melville/NYT)

Action

Daniel Barenboim, West-Eastern Divan Orchestra

Palestinian-Israeli musical ensemble (photo: Kerstin Joensson/AP)

Action

Great Day on Eldrige Street

N.Y.'s klezmer greats celebrate shul rededication (photo: Leo Sorel)

Action

Joint Appeal for Peace

(Avi Katz)

Joint Appeal for Peace

Ketubah, Ancona, Italy (1772)

(Jewish Theological Seminary library)

Ancona ketubah

Posts Tagged ‘democracy’

America’s Multiracial Baby Boom, Coming to Israel…Ever?

Monday, January 31st, 2011

The NY Times reported this week on a rising demographic phenomenon in American life: multiracialism.  One in seven new marriages in the U.S. in 2009 involved members of different races.  Multiracial Americans are one the fastest growing groups:

Many young adults of mixed backgrounds are rejecting the color lines that have defined Americans for generations in favor of a much more fluid sense of identity…

They are also using the strength in their growing numbers to affirm roots that were once portrayed as tragic or pitiable.

“I think it’s really important to acknowledge who you are and everything that makes you that,” said [Laura] Wood.

…Optimists say the blending of the races is a step toward transcending race, to a place where America is free of bigotry, prejudice and programs like affirmative action.

Warren Olney’s To the Point covered this story today.  A pollster noted that 80-90% of Americans under the age of 30 would have no problem with a close family member marrying someone of another race.  Among those 65 or older the level of acceptance was 30%.

bad faith interracial film

'Bad Faith' film poster: 'She's Jewish, he's Arab. They're expecting...'

This reminded me of a shattering annual survey of Israeli attitudes toward democracy.  46% of Israelis said they would not want to live next door to an Israeli Palestinian.  The numbers were only slightly better when you substituted “gay,” “mentally ill,” or “foreign worker.”  You can imagine what the number would’ve been had the question asked about a child marrying an “Arab.”

In this country, imperfect as race relations may be, you can see things are generally moving in a positive direction.  In Israel, not so much.  I don’t recall poll results broken down by age, nor do I recall a specific question about multi-ethnic or biracial couples, but I’d be willing to bet that there is only marginally more acceptance among young Israelis than old of this phenomenon.

And let’s not forget the learned rabbis shreying about assimilation when Arab men steal ‘our women’ and take them back to the village where they’ll be victimized, assaulted, and brainwashed in the ways of Islam.  Not to mention all the “Ahmed ben Sarah” babies they’ll be producing.

While I am proud of my Jewish identity, you have to face the fact that if you want Israel truly to thrive there must be lots more Ahmed ben Sarahs.  One of the best ways for Israeli Jews to understand their fellow Palestinian citizens is for their children to marry each other.  But think about what such couples face in contemporary Israel.  Something like the ostracism and outrage that greeted mixed race couples in America in the 1960s.

And let’s face the issue of bi-racialism.  Will it harm Jewish or Palestinian identity?  Why should it?  Not to mention: don’t we want an “Israeli identity” to emerge just as much or more than a purely Jewish or Palestinian one?  It is a fatal error to conflate “Israel” with “Jewish.”  It is and must be both.

If this troubles you overly or you’re geshreying about the end of the Jewish race, then you must face the fact that Palestinians can have little place in your vision of Israel.  Might as well send them away (transfer) as Abraham did Hagar and Ishmael.

Israel and its supporters in the Diaspora must learn to walk the democratic walk and talk the democratic talk.  Otherwise, it’s just window dressing.

Teheran 2009: Precursor of Middle Eastern Revolutions

Saturday, January 29th, 2011

In all the coverage I’ve read of the Tunisian and impending Egyptian political revolutions I haven’t read any observer make the connection that came to me today.  If there is any precursor to these earth-shaking acts of social transformation, it might be in the June, 2009 convulsions that rocked Iran following the contested elections there.  While it’s true that the Iranian mullahs outlasted and outmuscled their opponents and preserved their hold on power, I think the drama of this near-revolution wasn’t lost on young people throughout the region struggling under the burden of similarly corrupt, unresponsive and autocratic regimes.  While Iran was a near miss, I think it may’ve inspired others.

Other similarities come to mind: Iran’s Green Revolution was powered largely by disaffected, non-ideological youth fed up with a moribund system that offered them no prospects either economically or politically.  The vision of the reformers was an Iranian democratic system that retained its Muslim character.  Tunisia, a much more secular country, certainly lacked the impulse for a Muslim component to its revolution.  But the cries for democracy and an end to rule by fiat would certainly resonate in both Iran 2010 and Tunisia 2011. Each of these revolutions had its martyr: Mohamed Bouazizi is Tunisia’s Neda Soltan.

cairo demonstrations

Egyptian protesters fight for key bridge (Peter Macdiarmid/Getty)

Cairo’s revolution is still in the making and no one can tell what will happen there.  Mubarak has been sly and skilled in dividing and conquering his political competitors and enemies.  No one knows whether he can pull this one out or will be buried by the weight of the nation’s disillusionment with him.  The stakes are very high.  Egypt is one of the most populous nations in the region with one of the largest militaries.  It also has a rocky historical relationship with Israel along with a potent Islamist movement that could possibly either come to power or play a critical role in a post-Mubarak era.  While it appears impossible that Egypt could be the author of a second Islamist revolution à la Iran, it still wouldn’t take much to drastically alter the playing field of Middle Eastern politics.

If Mubarak goes, one of America’s strongest allies in the region will disappear.  While Israel’s relationship ran more cold than hot, at least it knew what to expect of Egypt under Mubarak.  A radical change at the top will make both Israel and America terribly nervous.  Imagine for example, an Egypt which was not hostile to Hamas. I’m not even talking about a new government that would embrace or endorse Hamas, but one that would merely be neutral. You can see right there how this would severely undermine the current consensus that Hamas is the devil incarnate.

Despite the U.S. calls for democracy in the region (especially under George Bush), the truth is that America prefers the devil it knows to the one it doesn’t.  And make no mistake, true democracy in the Middle East is a scary proposition for both.  What George Bush and other American leaders never understood is that democracy means independence: independent thinking, independent alliances, nations seeking their own interests rather than the interest of a ruling élite.  That is not something that makes us uncomfortable.  We (and I include Israel in this) want countries subservient to us and our interests.  Sure, we’re willing to collude with the Mubaraks and Ben Alis and give them what they want.  But we want something in return.

Truly democratic regimes will be seeking not the interests of a ruling family, but of an entire nation.  And this may, indeed will bring these countries into conflict with their former allies, mentors and masters.  It could be a long, rocky road.

Returning to Iran: the results of these upheavals won’t be lost either on the regime or the reformers.  While the ruling Ayatollahs mustered more flexibility and political shrewdness in holding off their adversaries, there could be a fire next time to quote James Baldwin.  Next time the mullahs may neither be as lucky or as successful.  The example of one and perhaps two (and if Yemen’s dictator goes, perhaps three) tyrants being felled in a short interval will resonate throughout Iran.  The fact that these revolutions are powered largely by a vision of democracy (or if not that, then at least greater freedom) and not specifically by Islam does not bode well for Iran’s rulers either.

If there is massive change in regimes, it will not bode well for Israel.  As the Palestine Papers have revealed, Israel thrives on forcing its will on its Arab opponents.  When there is a new set of leaders who cannot be co-opted, coerced or colluded with, all bets are off.  Israel must feel like the Chinese proverb: may you be cursed to live in interesting times.

One thing we learned from the Teheran upheaval is that everything can change or perhaps nothing.  So we’ll have to see how things develop.

When Israeli Police Become Criminals, Who Protects Citizens?

Wednesday, November 10th, 2010
Israeli suspect assaulted by police

Israeli Palestinian suspect publicly assaulted by police

In this blog, I focus less on purely internal Israeli politics and more on the bigger picture of Israeli democracy and relations with its Palestinian minority and the Occupation.  But Eyal Clyne has written a riveting, tremendously comprehensive report on a massive pattern of corruption and violence by the police against the entire Israeli public.  The culture of brutality exhibited by the Israeli police can only flourish in a nation obsessed, as Israel is, by security.  It can only flourish in a nation which had made a Faustian bargain with the police and security forces: protect us and we will allow you anything.

Israeli peace activists often argue quite persuasively that the incredibly high level of corruption and violence within Israeli society is due in large part to the corrupting influence of the Occupation.  In the cases you’ll read below, you’ll find that the violence exhibited by the police against its own fellow citizens appears to be learned in large part from the brutality officers see and practice during their own IDF service.  The toxic apple doesn’t fall far from the tree.

I am not making the claim, nor does Eyal, that there are not police forces in virtually any and every country which commit grievous acts that remind us of what we’ll read here.  In fact, in the 1970s and 80s a number of U.S. cities in which I lived, including New York and Los Angeles had police forces which tended to run roughshod over any member of the public that was in its path.  The records of police brutality are long and legion in such places.   But thankfully, this systemic pattern of behavior has been largely rooted out leaving only individual examples that make headlines at regular intervals.

Israeli policing seems stuck somewhere back in the 1970s in U.S. terms.  Here are some of Eyal’s most egregious examples.  There are more links in this post than I’ve ever seen in any other and unfortunately for most of you, they are in Hebrew.  I admire that Eyal has offered evidence in the form of links for every claim he makes.  It makes his post even more powerful and damning.

He begins with the story of an Israeli man wanted by police in a domestic violence dispute.  His encounter with the police didn’t end well for him.  Israeli news coverage says that when the man tried to speed away in his vehicle a police officer, cowboy-like, jumped on the hood of his car and proceeded to shoot him numerous times all over his body:

Yesterday, a policeman shot and killed a suspect. The suspect was very suspicious. He was suspected of being obsessive, of harassment, and of resisting arrest. There are those who also say he was suspected of an attempted vehicular assault [on the police officer].  These turned out to be capital crimes. The late suspect was “lucky” not to be an Arab, because as a Jew, the circumstances of his death are at the very least questioned. It also turns out that the suspect may have been obsessive, but the policeman also demonstrated some obsessiveness of his own. Rather than moving aside he clung to the engine hood, and shot the driver to death, both in the upper and lower parts of his body several times.  Once was not enough.

The Ynet news portal apparently saw this shooting as being justified, or at least understandable, as their headlines stated unequivocally that the event was “an attempted vehicular killing”, which contradicted both on-the-scene testimony and the assaulting policeman’s own history – and well before any investigation had occurred.

Israel’s police often does not live up to the directives of the law and tend to be rude, violent, flawed in terms of conduct, and characterized by a masterful resolve to show the citizenry just who is boss.

Israeli police violence

Israeli police violence: 'Get on the bus before I break your bones."

…In the Israel police there is a norm of violence and a lordly attitude; policemen take it upon themselves to act in a rude and criminal manner; and they enjoy nearly automatic backing from their commanders, who are also afflicted by this dysfunctional approach.

…The famous slogan “To Serve and Protect” is okay for television drama series – it has nothing to do with life in Israel. You might want to ask just who serves whom and admit that what gets protected is first and foremost the honor of the policeman, not the rights of the citizens. No, the word “honor” does not mean fairness, integrity, and professionalism. It refers, instead, to the questionable “honor” that we meet in the phrase “honor killing.” It is the honor demanded by thugs in the ‘hood, except that it wears a uniform and badge. If you “offend” them (and they get offended easily; they’re quite sensitive) they could bite your lip right off your facebeat, humiliate, and sexually harass youfine you for NIS 1,000, have you kicked out of the Civil Guardarrest you, and spray you with gas. It’s as if you work for the policemen rather than the other way around.

That’s what it’s like with bullies. Just give them power, a weapon, or a certificate and they’ll harass everyone, just because they can. They’ll pour your beer out on the beach, harass passers-by on the street (herehere, and here), break your nosebeat the **** out of you and mock youthrow stonesopen fire for no reason, and harass women (while threatening them with arrests). On the road you must never tell them when they drive wildlypark illegally, and even when a 70-year old man dares challenge anything – he’ll catch flackOn soccer fields they bust your faces (see also herehereherehere, and in all items linked from there), and at home they’ll fine you for groaning too loudlyattack you with bare fistswrestle with you, and commit perjury when testifying about it, to cover up. On personal time they will be “role models of crime”: they’ll call prostitutes to the stationsteal money from suspectsplace explosive chargesgive false testimony, and drop by in the middle of the night without a warrant, just to scare someone whom they see as calling for the oversight of police forces. One of the senior staffers in the Violence Prevention Department went so far in his quest to be a role model that he actually attacked a woman subordinate employee, working in his department.

Abuse of authority shows up at every stage of criminal proceedings, from the use of violence on the scene through illegal and false arrests, interrogations, and trial…The policemen abuse the laxness in the justice system to do anything they want to citizens, arresting people at their whimfalse arrests,unlawfully, including the arrest of children, as well as threatening arrest, which is all done violently and in contravention of the law (see also: herehere,hereherehereherehere, and here). While they’re at it they can also humiliate people: right-wing activists, a motorcycle thiefPalestinians, etc. Sometimes they also arrest and humiliate run-of-the-mill people due to a simple mistaken identity. Yet, some of these cases end up in death, like the policeman who killed a suspect, and another policeman who fatally shot a suspect, the policeman who cursed and fired his weapon, thus causing of death of a detainee, and the policeman who threw a metal bar at a moving motorcyclist.

…Israeli Judges are pretty easy to co-opt, and for that reason innocent people (and that could be any of us) spend months in custody, for no reason. Startin’ to get the picture? Well, you ain’t seen nothin’ yet.

While under arrest the police are supposed to protect us, our property and our bodies. In practice, they act in violation of the law: they handcuff minors for hours, and handcuffed people are attacked while cuffed, inside the police station, and are sprayed with mace. Policemen have also hit a suspect to the point of rendering him paralyzed, and police officers take part, as well, and slam the heads of bound detainees against the wall. In one of the false arrests, which was accompanied by a warrantless search, a young detainee was beaten for hours and raped.

…The ‘romantic’ notion of investigation is entirely detached from true reality, where the police has spent years covering up justified complaintsfalsifying evidence, and adopting untrue testimonies when it felt easier. In other cases evidence “disappeared” (CDs herehard disks there, the end of the tape went missing here, and the entire tape was gone here). In the course of the investigation they also violate the right to counsel, the right to make a phone call, they steal money from suspects and violate the rights of detainees (many of whom are innocent) – and all these are stories just from the last few months.

…Judges have had to rule several times that policemen were lying, and that rather than demonstrators attacking policemen, policemen had actually attacked demonstrators. In fact, in this interview, the video showing in the background demonstrates a policeman kicking a detainee. Of course, even in those cases the policemen were not charged. In general, courts naïvely ascribe good faith to the people charged with upholding the law. The astonishing fact that 99%(!) of wiretaps requests are approved by the courts is indicative of this, as are the many cases when the court simply ignores clear evidence at the request of the police. So if you think that after the investigation you will have a fair trial, you are wrong again. Despite the fact that policemen regularly lie to the courts, unless you can prove that the policemen are lying…you will be in dire straits and the judges will prefer to believe their lies. And sometimes, even proving that they’re lying is not enough. Finally, if you are actually charged with a crime, you have veritably no chance of being exonerated, since in Israel more than 98%(!) of defendants are convicted.

…Legally speaking, the police are supposed to ensure your right to protest – but…more than anything else they want “quiet”, and they try and achieve it in several stages. First they try to prevent the demonstrations, which is illegal (this happened in demonstrations against the disengagementagainst the siege of Gaza, of Hasidophobics in Bnei Brak, in extreme right-wing rallies in Umm Al-Fahm, in front of the offices of the Islamic Movement, and in Silwan, and of the left in Sheikh Jarrah, and in the Occupied Territories). If the demonstrators have the resources to appeal to the Supreme Court, the demonstration will take place, and the next stage involves dispersing the demonstrators (to smithereens). The policemen arrive on the scene all fired up, and only the identity of the people suffering their rage changes: sometimes these are ultra-orthodox Jews (see: herehereand here), then they are settlers and right-wing activists (herehereherehereherehere, and here), or students (hereherehere). Or it could be motorcyclists protesting, or those evicted from their homes by the rich, and of course, left-wing activists and Arabs (herehere,hereherehereherehereherehereherehere). And there is still more! Here it is on Google Video, and here it is on YouTube. And when the bullies are above the law, it is hardly surprising that consequences are devastating: tear gas killed a toddler, police fire killed a little girl (and yet, the investigation was closed).

In demonstrations and on soccer fields, say the numerous testimonies and evidence, there is a police norm of hiding name-tags and faces, to prevent identification. This extends to officers, as well. People do not hide their identity unless they have something to fear and, like robbers, policemen know that they do, in fact, have something to hide. It is only the unlawful anonymity which protects them from accountability, and they prepare for it because they know that this way they can beat people up when they like. The problem of police violence is especially acute in the Border Patrol and the Special Patrol Units, which are sent out, again and again, to demonstrations and soccer games to “do the job” (i.e. beat up innocent civilians, and while they’re at it, conduct unlawful arrests with great violence, and never be held accountable). Israeli cops forget that they are not here to create the law but rather to enforce it, and they persistently make up rules on the spot (such as prohibiting the flying of one flag or another, stating that there is no permit for a demonstration which does not actually require a permit, and so forth). This is how it happens that – although the right to demonstrate is a basic right in a democracy, and although the policemen are supposed to protect those rights – in practice they do everything they can to prevent them, and on the scene they become a source of unbridled violence that no-one can handle.

…Something is rotten in the kingdom of handcuffs. The stench is unbearable. The Israel police has become one of the greatest problems in the State of Israel. More and more of its personnel, who are supposed to be in charge of law enforcement, have become terrifying bullies, and instead of protecting and serving the citizens, they are becoming the largest criminal organization in the country. This is especially true when it comes to the courtesy they show, and most of all during arrests, interrogations, and demonstrations. They act with great violence and a sense of being the masters of the citizenry, and abuse their authority to lie to the courts. This will hit all of us, although we do not know when, because as far as they are concerned, the police are not here to serve the citizens but rather, for the citizens to serve them and for their mission, with no accountability. They attack with no second thoughts, they assume we are all criminals, while they themselves ignore the law. Rights? Due process? Freedom of expression? Serving the citizens? Not in Israel, apparently.

We, the people, have only to wonder: when the police are the criminals, who will protect our rights?

New Israel Fund ‘Jewish Homeland’ Controversy

Monday, August 30th, 2010

I posted here about the controversy concerning NIF’s new guidelines as reported by Nathan Guttman in The Forward.  He reported that the group would require grantees to acknowledge Israel as a Jewish homeland.  On that basis, I wrote a post harshly critical of what I perceived as a one-sided set of rules which would discriminate against Israeli Palestinian grantees.

Apparently, according to an authoritative source, Guttman portrayed the guidelines incompletely.  The sources he used for his report appeared interested, again I have this from a reliable source, in guidelines that would’ve forced grantees to acknowledge Israel as a Jewish state.  That isn’t going to happen.

Leonard Fein, in fact, said in my last post when I noted that NIF was considering compelling grantees to acknowledge Israel as a Jewish state, that I had lied.  And then he had the chutzpah to wish me a healthy New Year!  In fact, there were those within the NIF who proposed just that.  But their proposal was not successful.

My source tells me the proposed guidelines will include a provision acknowledging Israel as a Jewish homeland.  But the language will also affirm that Israel is:

…A democracy dedicated to the full equality of all its citizens and communities.

I want to make clear that while I’m not fully satisfied with this new wording, it’s less offensive than the incomplete language suggested by Guttman.  And I believe that those who negotiated this wording did so in good faith and attempted to conciliate both a Jewish and Palestinian perspective on the issue.

The reason I’m less than content with the above quoted language is that it does not offer Israeli Palestinians what it offers Israeli Jews.  If you are dedicated to the full equality of all citizens and you’ve conceded to Jews that their nation is their homeland, but refuse to concede this to Palestinian citizens, then they still aren’t equal to Jews.  You’ve come awfully close, but close isn’t equal.  There are some things you just can’t finesse and this is one of them.

There is absolutely no reason that Israel cannot be a single state in which two separate ethnic groups see it as their respective homelands.  For any who would claim that this formulation indicates a bi-national state, that is not the case since Israel will still be a unitary state containing two major ethnic groups.  It will not be two states and will not divide into two separate ethnic enclaves.  While there are some especially on the Jewish side who would prefer to see Israel as a state rid of Palestinians, most Israeli Jews want a state in which the two groups co-exist within a single state of Israel.  Palestinian citizens, of course, want a unitary, and not bi-national state.

Knesset Strips Palestinian MK of Parliamentary Privileges

Tuesday, July 13th, 2010
haneen zoabi

34 Knesset members voted to strip MK Haneen Zoabi of her privileges

Every day seems to bring yet a new outrage against free speech and democratic rights in Israel.  Yesterday, the Israeli police manhandled the director of Women of the Wall, wrested a sacred Torah scroll from her hands, and hauled her off to jail–all for praying.  Today, it only took 34 of the 120 member of the Knesset who actually had the guts to strip Israeli Palestinian MK Haneen Zoabi of her parliamentary privileges–all because she represented her constituents faithfully and joined the Gaza flotilla.  The greatest shame perhaps is that only 16 Knesset members opposed this anti-democratic abortion.

What is interesting about all this is that Zoabi broke no Israeli law in doing so (she might have had the flotilla reached Gaza).  So in effect, the Knesset minority basically said you did something offensive and we will punish you for it.  This usurps the legal process by which the police and attorney general would do their job and ferret out illegality and prosecute it.  It is an entirely arbitrary and capricious act and I hope she will appeal it to the Supreme Court, a body which at times has been known to get off its duff and protect the rights of Israel’s largest ethnic minority.

It should also be noted that MK Zoabi had the honor of a Facebook group created which wished her good health in the form of demanding she be hung from the highest tree for her ‘betrayal’ of the State.  This indicates the robust good health of Israeli democracy.

Knesset speaker Reuven Rivlin is on record opposing the measure which passed, which is a tribute to his sense of the dignity of the Knesset.  However, he is wrong when he warns the right wing Knesset members that once they strip Zoabi, that their privileges and immunity too could be stripped.  He’s wrong because no Israeli Knesset would ever strip a right-wing member of immunity.  The right-wing essentially owns the Knesset and they can act with virtual impunity barring an act of Kahane-Goldstein like mass mayhem.

I have often written here that Israel, instead of a democracy, is a national security state which accords Jews superior rights and Palestinian citizens rights at its discretion.  When it is inconvenient to the State, the rights of the Arab minority are curtailed at will.

The last MK whose immunity was stripped was Azmi Bishara, who was driven into forced exile by the Shin Bet.  Who knows what the rightist MKs have in store for Zoabi next?  There is a campaign to strip her of citizenship entirely and leave her stateless like hundreds of thousands of Israeli Palestinian refugees from 1948.  Wouldn’t that be an irony worth noting?  If I were her I would dare them to do so.  It will only harm Israel’s image and burnish Zoabi’s.

I’ve got news for any advocate for Israel as a Jewish supremacist state out there: “they” have as much right to be there as you (or we Jews, if you prefer) do.  They’re not going away.  You can only deprive them of their rights so long.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Im Tirtzu is NOT, Repeat NOT a Bunch of Jack-Booted Right-Wing Thugs!

Monday, May 17th, 2010
im tirtzu parody

Im Tirtzu parody site ("Whether You Want it or Not")

Got that? You better. ‘Cause if you don’t or if you have any other opinion on the matter Ronen Shoval, founder of the Israeli hasbara outfit will set you straight; or else sue your ass off. I don’t know if Ronen has considered how he can do that to those outside Israel, but considering how many Israelis he’s threatened with lawsuits if they bad-mouth the group, he’ll undoubtedly find a way to sic someone on me as well. But like Didi Remez, one of those he’s threatened, I have no fear of his thuggery.

Ronen Shova

Ronen Shoval, Herzl's capo di tutti (Yanai Yechiel)

There’s a lot of interesting matters to report about the thugs who parodied New Israel Fund chair, Naomi Chazan by displaying a rhino horn on her head in ads which accused her and NIF of being traitors to the State of Israel for cooperating with the Goldstone Report (NIF didn’t, though some of its grantees did).

Those of you who know and use Wikipedia may think of it as a repository of online information, a sort of freewheeling encyclopedia of knowledge.  Everywhere but Israel that is.  Partly because of excessive editorial caution, partly because of a societal fear of violating political consensus, and partly because of legal blackmail, Hebrew Wikipedia shies away from a number of controversial subjects.  I wrote here that it removed an article about Anat Kamm and refused to publish anything until well after the gag order about her arrest was lifted (a number of us interested in the subject made sure there was an English Wikipedia entry).

Now, Wikipedia has also removed an article about Im Tirtzu under threat of lawsuit if it calls the group “right-wing.”  The editors refuse this concession and their only recourse seems to be to remain silent on the entire issue.  You can’t find any article about the group in Hebrew Wikipedia.  I’m not enough of a Wikipedian to know how the various editions are run and how each edition relates to the broader Wikipedia movement, but it seems to me that Hebrew Wikipedia falls far short of the free-wheeling, authority-defying standards that I’ve always thought the broader project represented.

I cannot exert any pressure on the contents or editors of Hebrew Wikipedia.  I doubt they know or care what I have to say.  But I will certainly report its deficiencies to my readers and hope that they will make my views known within an Israeli context.

Let’s tell it like it is.  Ronen Shoval is a thug.  Maybe he’s not a thug in the sense of beating Naomi Hazan up in a dark alley in Tel Aviv and sending her to the hospital.  But he’s a garden-variety political thug.  Thugs threaten.  They bully.  They use the system to get what they want.  They confront.  They get in your face.  So what do you do if you’re a target of these biryonim?  Do you remain silent?  Do you worry about lawyer’s fees?  Do you back down?  Hell no.  Not unless you want them to redouble their attacks on you.

You stand toe to toe and face to face.  You let them know you will defend your position b’chol m’odecha (“everything in your power”).  You let them know if they want to draw metaphoric blood their’s will be mixed with yours.  I tell them if they want to threaten to sue, bring it on (just as Didi has done, kol hakavod lo ["more power to him"]).

Shoval, or whoever directs or advises him, might want to consider that vacant threats of legal action tend to provoke precisely the types of hostile responses to Im Tirtzu which bring on the threats to begin with.

So here’s something else to stew over Ronen.  This blog has reported that It Tirtzu received $200,000 over two years from John Hagee’s Christians United for Israel.  Hagee, the apocalyptic “not-one-inch” Christian Zionist boasts about contributing millions to Israel.  I’ve listed a good deal of his settler and right-wing grantees.

Yossi Gurvitz reveals in his Israeli blog that Im Tirtzu is using the American Jewish settler group, the Central Fund of Israel, as its pass-through 501c3 which enables U.S. donors to receive a tax-deduction in return for their support for right wing Israeli political thuggery.  Since Im Tirtzu is a fairly new organization, there will not yet be an IRS 990 record of how much the group will receive from CFI.  But considering the latter raised $47-million in 2008, the amount could be sizable.  Undoubtedly, a chunk of it will go to pay Im Tirtzu’s lawyer’s fees for all the Israelis and American Jews they plan to sue for slander.

In case you hadn’t heard of CFI or don’t believe my claims about them.  Here are some of the wonderful enterprises they’ve funded:  Honenu, which provides legal representation for Jewish terrorists like Yigal Amir and Jack Teitel and lobbies for their release from prison.  Women in Green, whose leader, Nadia Matar, supported the assassination of Mahmoud Abbas during a speech she gave at a Manhattan shul a few years ago.  Over a half-million dollars of these funds went to support “security” for Israeli settlements which can include anything from K-9 attack dogs to communication gear to Uzis.

As Yossi Gurvitz says, if something looks like a right-wing duck and walks and talks like one then it is one:

Im Tirzu’s masquerading as a centrist movement, while it feeds at the trough of an extreme right wing fundraising society, should cast a shadow on each and every one of its claims.

Im Tirtzu is a danger to Israeli democracy.   Indeed its flourishing indicates something deeply rotten with the Israeli body politic.

For those who need a good, healthy dose of satire and who know some Hebrew, take yourself immediately to this parody site, Im Tirtzu Im Lo Tirzu (“Whether You Want It or Not,” a parody of the original Herzl-inspired name, “If You Will It”).  The parody site’s sub-title is: “The quiet fascist revolution.”  Shoval’s lawyers should be filing suit shortly…

Which brings me to the observation that the closer Israel gets to flat-out authoritarianism the stronger, sharper and more telling becomes the political satire.  This is how Vaclav Havel got his start before the Velvet Revolution took hold.  It must’ve been what it was like in the days of Sovet samizdat.  It’s probably like this in Ahmadinejad’s Iran.  Is this what Israel has come to?  Instead of the Prelude to a Kiss, it’s the prelude to full-blown rightist supremacy.  The Shin Bet will “advise” the prime minister, who will dutifully do as he is told.  Or better yet as in Russia, the prime minister might just as well BE a former officer in the intelligence services (that would be Tzipi Livni if she ever gets anywhere near the prime ministership, which is highly doubtful).

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Shin Bet Judge Denies Foreign Media Plays Any Role in Lifting Gag

Monday, May 10th, 2010
Judge Einat Ron

Judge Einat Ron, never met a Shin Bat gag order she didn't like

A few of my Israeli friends have sent me a link to a Yediot interview with Judge Einat Ron, who I disparagingly call the “Shin Bet judge” in my post title, even though she formally isn’t.  She’s a real judge who might just as well work directly for the Shin Bet since, as with all Israeli courts, she is at the beck and call of the security services.  If they want a gag order they get one.  If they’re ready to remove it, it will be removed.  I don’t think I’ve ever, except in the relatively rare case of the Supreme Court, heard of a lower court judge actually bucking the Shin Bet and acting independently.

In any case, I had a feeling that was alternately strange and gratifying when the judge, who I’ve criticized harshly for the similar role she played in the Anat Kamm case and coaching the IDF to wiggle out of culpability in the wanton killing of an 11-year old Palestinian boy, seemingly addressed me indirectly in her interview.  She was asked about approving gag orders and whether she factors into her decisions the coverage that such orders receive in foreign media (a story in Ynet yesterday credited Tikun Olam with playing a leading role in breaking the story outside Israel):

Judge Ron, who restricted her gag order regarding the latest spying case at whose center stand Ameer Makhoul and Omer Said, explained that she isn’t influenced by foreign publications, but that gag orders are judged in a matter-of-fact manner…She enumerated [one reason for gag orders] “a pronounced fear regarding potential damage to the security of the State.”

She also commented on the fact that the case has been covered abroad, as Ynet reported yesterday, “As sometimes happens with in such situations there can be repercussions since gag order have no effect outside Israel.  The repercussions of this case were felt in foreign sources and publications outside Israel.  The reasons for approving, limiting or lifting a gag order do not take foreign media into account.  However, it is known that with technological innovations you cannot prevent such publications.

Along with this, the judge pointed out that foreign news coverage “doesn’t justify creating a situation in which no gag orders are issued at all,  since there remains considerable fear of harming the state’s security and harming an investigation…” if gag orders did not exist.

Haifa rally supporting Shin Bet victims Omer Said and Ameer Makhoul (Avishag Shear-Yeshuv)

To which I say, spoken like a true lawyer.  An excess of verbiage and a deficit of sense.  This is clearly an intelligent lawyer in service of a deformed system.  And she’s whistling in the wind.  Clearly, a judge would have to deny that media coverage plays any role in her decisions.  But it does.  And even if it doesn’t, Ron’s decisions are guided by the ‘seen hand’ of the Shin Bet, and the security agency is clearly influenced by external factors like media coverage.  Not to mention the outrage against this campaign from the Israeli Palestinian community, which clearly played a factor in partially lifting the gag today.

Earlier today, Ynet reported that 300 protestors gathered in Haifa to express their support for Ameer Makhoul and Omer Said, the victims of the latest Shin Bet machinations.  An Israeli Arab MK expressed outrage at the security assault:

MK El-Sana added, “Shin Bet Chief Yuval Diskin should not be the one handling the government’s policy regarding the Arab minority. It’s not a crime to be a Palestinian in Israel.”

Makhoul’s brother threw the charges of spying back at the government:

“Ameer is strong,” he continued. “He will face this onslaught head-on, and at the end of the day, those facing justice would be the authorities…not him”

This reminded me of the Dylan song:

The loser now will be later to win…

And the first one now will later be last
For the times they are a-changin’

To some, depending on their political orientation, this may sound like either bluster or vain hope.  But the great Mandala will turn and someday it will be the Makhouls and Saids of the world who will be lionized, while the Diskins will be spurned for their vain effort to stave off the inevitable transformation of Israel into a multi-ethnic state affirming the equal rights of all groups with none holding supremacy.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Anat Kamm, Self-Censorship and the Israeli Left

Friday, March 19th, 2010

This blog was the first English-language source which reported that Israeli journalist Anat Kam was secretly arrested by the Israeli police for allegedly leaking top secret IDF memos describing the army’s flagrant disregard for an Israeli Supreme Court ruling.  The latter provided limitations on the IDF’s use of targeted assassinations against Palestinian militants and the memos documented the army’s violation of the judicial decision.  I reported that not only was Kam’s arrest secret, but the reason for her arrest too was embargoed by the Shin Bet.

After I read every Hebrew source about this affair and wrote my own post, a number of these sources disappeared.  It turns out that Anat Kam herself and others on the Israeli left have urged those who have published to remove their material.  Indymedia Israel did this (see cached version).  Kam asked the Hebrew Wikipedia to remove the article about her and it did.  As a member wrote quite sensibly (in Hebrew) in response:

If Shimon Peres told you to remove his Wikipedia article, would you?

For a few days I also did so after an Israeli peace activist told me that Kam was negotiating with the Shin Bet and hoped if little was made of this affair that she might get off with no jail time.  I took my post down.  Then I wrote to Avigdor Feldman asking him to confirm that he wished me to do so.  I never received a reply.  I republished my post.

Aside from the Shin Bet’s egregious behavior, several developments in this case have troubled me.  First, I discovered that Anat Kam had published a tart dismissal of the Israeli conscientious objector movement.  I wondered how someone who allegedly leaked top secret documents discrediting the Israeli army’s policy on a item of major national security significance could also disparage the very peace movement which these memos would assist.

I also noticed that at a Hebrew language website which had archived all online sources dealing with this case, someone sounding very much like Kam, but using the pseudonym “Noa,” railed against the website owner for maintaining the archive.  I should add that I have other confirming evidence that the commenter was Kam.  Among other disparaging statements she made about him:

You know Anat Kam?  You tried to make contact with her?  Or did you take on yourself the decision to be the Prince of Human Rights and Democracy and to claim you know what would be best for her?

…And further, I haven’t even begun to count to the number of times you were an accomplice to violations of the gag order (linking to articles which commit such a violation makes you into a criminal accomplice.  It’s a good idea to examine the law from time to time.)”

On reading this, Aryeh Amihay, owner of the website took the entire archive post down.  He too was intimidated by the veiled threat in the comment.  So someone will have to explain to me how this sort of behavior serves anyone’s interests, even Kam’s.  I fully understand that she is only 23 years old, faces very serious charges, and is under enormous pressure from the security establishment.  I understand how this can turn one from being a principled person attempting to do good into someone seeking to save their own hide.  In fact, I had experience with another whistleblower who, after being caught, acted in almost precisely the same way.  This appears to be part of human nature, the instinct for self-preservation.  So I am trying not to be judgmental on that score.  But this seems to go far beyond what is required under the circumstances.

So I’d recommend that those on the Israeli left who’ve cooperated with the wall of silence reconsider their decisions.  I continue to believe that silence doesn’t serve the greater good of Israeli democracy.  I don’t even believe it serves Anat Kam’s interests, but as she herself says, that’s for her to determine.

I don’t know what motivated Anat Kam allegedly to leak the IDF memos.  I would hope her actions were based on a citizen’s disgust with the army’s brazen disregard for the rule of law.  But it occurs to me, and I freely concede and even hope I am wrong, that the leak may’ve been motivated by an aspiring journalist who found herself in a position to advance her career by making such material public through Israel’s leading daily newspaper, Haaretz, and a respected investigative journalist, Uri Blau.  I also note that following her army service she went to work for Walla, an internet portal owned by Haaretz.  Coincidence?

There are aspects of this case which still have not come to light.  Anat Kam is not the alpha and the omega of this story.  More than this, I can’t say at this time.  I look forward to being able to say more at a later date.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
Performance Optimization WordPress Plugins by W3 EDGE