Muslim and Jewish Women in Nazareth

'We can live in peace'...John Lennon (photo: Dafna Tal)

Mahzor

Mahzor

New York Public Library

Churches

Sarajevo Haggadah

Mah Nishtanah

Sarajevo haggadah

Antaea Darom

Israeli women's art

Action

Torah as music

Ben Heine

Action

ceramic bowl

Mohammad Said Kalash, "Offering Reconciliation" exhibit (photo: Ilan Amihai)

Action

Punch and Judy/Pinchas and Jamila

Avi Katz

Action

David Grossman

Ben Heine

Action

Eldrige Street shul

Lower East Side

Action

Dove

Ben Heine

Action

Two birds

Hoda Jamal

Action

Israeli and Palestinian boys

from documentary, Promises

Action

Cat in the Hat

Yiddish version

Action

Daylight through the Wall

Banksy: graffiti art on Separation Wall

Action

Maurice Sendak's Brundibar set

New Victory Theater (photo: Nan Melville/NYT)

Action

Daniel Barenboim, West-Eastern Divan Orchestra

Palestinian-Israeli musical ensemble (photo: Kerstin Joensson/AP)

Action

Great Day on Eldrige Street

N.Y.'s klezmer greats celebrate shul rededication (photo: Leo Sorel)

Action

Joint Appeal for Peace

(Avi Katz)

Joint Appeal for Peace

Ketubah, Ancona, Italy (1772)

(Jewish Theological Seminary library)

Ancona ketubah

Posts Tagged ‘dave-reichert’

Daily Kos AWOL on the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict

Saturday, September 20th, 2008

Today, I attended a fundraiser for Darcy Burner, who is a candidate for Washington’s 8th Congressional district. She is challenging Dave Reichert, western Washington’s celebrity sheriff who coasted to victory on the strength of his capture of the Green River rapist (it only took him eight years to do so).

Darcy is a tremendous candidate and smart as a whip.  In fact, given that she worked at Microsoft, she’s one of those almost terrifyingly smart people like you hear about all the time there.  She came within 4,200 votes of defeating a Republican incumbent from a district which has NEVER elected a Democrat.  And I hope she gains those 4,200 votes and then some come November.

I’ve already contributed to Darcy through JStreetPAC, which endorsed her.  I urge my readers to consider donating as well.

I met a member of AIPAC’s local board at this fundraiser and she noted that AIPAC retains great respect for “Dave” since he’s “sung the right tune” for Israel.  You can only imagine what that means.  My expectation is that when Darcy wins, AIPAC will face a much more independent (though still supportive of Israel) Congressmember than the current officeholder.

There was a blogger in the audience whom Darcy introduced.  I didn’t catch her name.  She was recording Darcy’s talk and Darcy referred to the immense support she’s received from the online progressive blogging community.  I didn’t realize until a few moments ago when I began writing this that the blogger was actually from Daily Kos (I misheard the name of the blog, which is why nothing clicked when Darcy said the name). Which will all begin to make perfect sense when I recount the following account of my interaction with her.

I introduced myself to the visiting blogger as a local political blogger who writes about U.S.-Israel relations and the presidential election.  I asked her whether her blog (remember, I didn’t at the time know it was DK) ever covered the foreign policy implications of the Israeli-Arab conflict.

She shook her head sagely and said: “No.”  I asked her why.  “Because there’s just no upside in it for us.  Too much dissension and disagreement.”

So there you have it folks: one of the most popular progressive political sites ignores the Israeli-Palestinian conflict in its election coverage because there’s just no benefit to them in doing so.  I’ve written about this problem before after Markos condemned both sides at the beginning of the Lebanon war and rather obtusely and brusquely stated that the post would be his first and last word on the matter (i.e. “a pox on both their houses”).

DK is only interested in electing Democrats.  It is not interested in governing wisely or well.  It is not interested in promoting a sound or progressive U.S. foreign policy, at least not concerning Israel-Palestine. I find that simply astonishing.  A regional war between Israel and any number of its potential adversaries could embroil this country in very major hostilities.  It isn’t even out of the question that a nuclear conflict could break out there. Besides, there are clear lines demarcating Republican and Democratic approaches to the conflict.  Democrats should and do score points by noting the bankruptcy of Bush Administration policy over the past seven years.  Obama has presented a real alternative.  Making the Israeli-Palestinian conflict a part of DK’s agenda should be a no-brainer.  However, Kos’ attitude seems to be: “Don’t bother us with the sordid details of making policy, we’re busy electing Democrats.”

Now, don’t get me wrong.  I’m a Democrat too.  I want Democrats elected too.  But I am not so single-minded in that pursuit that I don’t care what the quality of the political agenda will be for those Democrats who ARE elected.  That’s why I think it is morally and politically bankrupt for Daily Kos to turn its back on Middle East peace.

Not surprisingly, this year’s NetRoots Nation conference did not include a single workshop or program on the I-P conflict.  Are we surprised?

DISCLOSURE: I was banned from Daily Kos for mentioning the name of Armando in the DK comment threads.  Yes, seriously that’s why.  I kid you not.

Mission Accomplished! Democrats Take Back House and Senate

Wednesday, November 8th, 2006
bush mission accomplishedMission Accomplished, my ass Mr. President

I just had to write that headline! It gives me oh so much pleasure to stick that shiv into Bush since he used it so long against Dems in trying to prop up this lousy war.

But to be fair, I have to acknowledge I’m writing this at 1AM PST and, while it appears that Webb has won Virginia and McCaskill Missouri, Jon Tester’s lead has diminished considerably over the course of the evening and as I write this he leads by something like 3,500 votes with only 82% counted. That could be a nail-biter. Plus, I understand there are absentee ballots to count in the Virginia race. But I still think Dems have an excellent shot at taking the Senate.

democratic supporters celebrate house victoryDems celebrate majority control of House (credit: Getty)

It’s pretty clear that Bush does not have the political resilience to do a Clinton after 1994 and recalibrate his political strategy. He just doesn’t have the wit or guile to do that. So we will have a president who will continue to live in denial about the decline of his power. Oh God how it pleases me to write that. And Dick Cheney will become a chained bulldog. Ditto on how I enjoy writing that too. If the Repubs were smart they’d bundle Dick up in an overcoat & shove him into a car and take him to some secure location for the remainder of the Bush presidency. That guy’s going to be radioactive in the next two years. Oh and last but not least, poor Karl. To go out like this in such a fizzle. It’s gotta hurt. I HOPE IT DOES! LOTS!

claire mccaskill celebrates senate election victoryClaire McCaskill celebrates Missouri Senate victory (credit: Huy Richard Mach/St. Louis Post-Dispatch)

Remember that recent crack of Bush’s about how when he gets really sad and lonely out there in the big bad Beltway cesspool, he likes to use Google Earth to take a look at the ranch and think how he’d like to be there. Oh how I’ll look forward to sending him there come 2008. It’ll be worth the wait to look at his crestfallen mug at the Inauguration of a Democratic president. The shame, the horror. How will he live it down? Of course, there’s a small matter of an election to win before we get there. But hey, I can dream.

Doesn’t this outcome make Charlie Crist, running for Florida governor, look prescient in refusing to be seen with Bush on the final day of the campaign? That was one of the delightful bits of news yesterday. Bush plans a FL. campaign trip solely to bolster Crist and the latter is the one who asked him to do it. And what does Crist do? He not only stiffs Bush, but he does it by joining John McCain at another rally! And guess who won the governor’s race? You guessed it, Crist. Smart guy.

We will have a Democratic party with very frail majorities and wanting to be extremely careful about not rocking the boat too hard, or rubbing the Repubs noses in their loss. I don’t see the Dems coming up with a bold centrist policy though I wish they could. The Congressional Republicans will be the wildcard here. Will they finally get some gumption and try to cobble together coalitions with Dems on a few discreet, major issues to get something done? Or will they follow the likely Bush path of obstructionism?

I’m heartened to hear that John Murtha will run for majority leader. He will be good for Dems on the Iraq issue.

The most important House race here is WA-08 in which Darcy Burner challenged Dave Reichert. The latter’s been ahead all night by 4% but the media’s still calling it “too close to call” with 40% of the vote counted. Hang in there Darcy! Wish I could’ve voted for you.

Pollster Sabato Predicts Democratic Wins in House and Senate

Tuesday, November 7th, 2006

I should begin by saying that I’m not expert on polls or pollsters. I know that Larry Sabato is a nationally respected pollster who teaches at the University of Virginia. I don’t know his track record of success in election prediction. But I’ll happily take his predictions at face value (especially if they turn out to be true). He prognosticates that the Democrats will pick up 29 seats in the House and 6 in the Senate which brings them to 221 House seats and 51 Senate seats:

THE SENATE: +6 Dems = 51D, 49R

Despite hard-fought campaigning in every battleground state up until the very end, the overall Senate picture has not changed much since our Thursday assessment. The Crystal Ball still sees 4, 5 or 6 seats going to the Democrats, resting party control of the Senate squarely on the edge of the butter knife.

The Democrats must win all the close ones and capture all the toss-ups to gain control, which is very tough to do. The safe bet is that Democrats will gain no more than five seats, and thus the GOP will remain in charge by a fingernail of the upper chamber of Congress. But what the heck? We’ll live dangerously. We think the Democrats may…capture just enough seats to take over. This is our least confident prediction.

This is what Sabato has to say about the House race:

THE HOUSE: +29 Dems = 232D, 203R

We admit: the Crystal Ball approaches the task of predicting the range of Democratic gains in the House with some anxiety. Politically, the House has always been the more volatile chamber of Congress this year; it has been the locus of far more scandal, and as always, there are more than ten times as many seats up for grabs in the House than there are in the Senate…

Even since we last published on Thursday, our list of late breaking races has grown much longer, and most of the shifts we have seen have favored the party out of power. Many of these contests emerged as horse races too late for the major parties to compete dollar-for-dollar in the districts at stake, and many are in such deeply red territory that they might not be good long-term investments for Democrats anyway. The Democratic thinking goes: “if we’re headed for a majority, why play in states like Idaho, Kansas, Nebraska, or Wyoming only to lose the seats in a less favorable political environment two years later?” Still, we’ll bet outcomes in one or two of these places will surprise us…

The Crystal Ball believes that Democrats will likely win more than enough races to take control (+25 to 33), and could see even larger gains if a large wave crashes even deeply red territory. By the same token, Democrats may end up leaving several of their 2nd or 3rd tier candidates stranded on 2nd or 3rd base with 47 or 48 percent of the vote on Election Night. We are betting that the toss-ups split evenly between the parties, 18 apiece. When we add up all of our predictions, Democrats gain 29 seats in the House to command the same size majority the GOP currently holds, 232-203

My only disappointment among Sabato’s predictions is that Dave Reichert beats Darcy Burner who I’ve been supporting almost since day one:

WA-08 – Toss-up – Rep. Dave Reichert (R) will win reelection overDarcy Burner (D). As a freshman, Reichert has had a big red target on his back all throughout this cycle, but his moves to moderate positions on issues such as stem cell research have met with applause in this suburban Seattle district. Republicans are now optimistic about holding this seat, and though we believe it will go down to the wire, we think Burner will fall just short of knocking off this GOP incumbent.

If she loses Darcy will’ve come damn close. But it’s a tragedy if Dave Reichert gets sent back to Congress. And hey, Sabato’s from Virginia. Maybe he’s no expert on Washington politics and wrong. Another poll last week had Burner ahead by 2%. Who’s right? We’ll find out tomorrow.