Muslim and Jewish Women in Nazareth

'We can live in peace'...John Lennon (photo: Dafna Tal)

Mahzor

Mahzor

New York Public Library

Churches

Sarajevo Haggadah

Mah Nishtanah

Sarajevo haggadah

Antaea Darom

Israeli women's art

Action

Torah as music

Ben Heine

Action

ceramic bowl

Mohammad Said Kalash, "Offering Reconciliation" exhibit (photo: Ilan Amihai)

Action

Punch and Judy/Pinchas and Jamila

Avi Katz

Action

David Grossman

Ben Heine

Action

Eldrige Street shul

Lower East Side

Action

Dove

Ben Heine

Action

Two birds

Hoda Jamal

Action

Israeli and Palestinian boys

from documentary, Promises

Action

Cat in the Hat

Yiddish version

Action

Daylight through the Wall

Banksy: graffiti art on Separation Wall

Action

Maurice Sendak's Brundibar set

New Victory Theater (photo: Nan Melville/NYT)

Action

Daniel Barenboim, West-Eastern Divan Orchestra

Palestinian-Israeli musical ensemble (photo: Kerstin Joensson/AP)

Action

Great Day on Eldrige Street

N.Y.'s klezmer greats celebrate shul rededication (photo: Leo Sorel)

Action

Joint Appeal for Peace

(Avi Katz)

Joint Appeal for Peace

Ketubah, Ancona, Italy (1772)

(Jewish Theological Seminary library)

Ancona ketubah

Posts Tagged ‘conscientious objector’

The Fruits of War are Death

Saturday, November 28th, 2009

Tonight, I heard a riveting piece of documentary radio journalism, Boots on the Ground (part 5, Coming Home), the story of those who come home from our wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.  Some return alive and some dead.  The segment I heard portrayed the work of an officer who informs families that their loved one has died in combat.

During the Vietnam war I was a conscientious objector, not because I was a pacifist and opposed all wars, though I certainly knew I opposed the Vietnam war and most other wars.  Documentaries like this one are almost enough to turn one into an absolute pacifist.  How can you confront these losses and the unending pain they inflict on those left behind?  Not to mention that loss of whatever the victim might have contributed to society had they lived.  Is this a price worth paying?

The author of Final Salute describes one particular family to whom this officer had to give the bad news:

A widow, Melissa Gibbens continues to celebrate her dead husband’s birthday.  He has two little boys–one little boy that never got to see him.  And so on his birthday they’ll blow up helium balloons and write messages to him on the balloons and then go outside and release them.  I asked what they were doing and the younger son said: “We’re sending the balloons to heaven.”

The stories, they do never end.  When Melissa told her son that his dad was dead he said: “Well, where is he?”  She said: “Well, he’s in heaven.”  He said: “Well, am I gonna be there?”  She said: “Yeah, but it’s gonna be a long time from now.”  And he asked his mom: “When I get to heaven can I still be 5 years old so I can dad can put me on his shoulders in the park?”

I’m crying as I write this. I can barely see the screen to type these words. What war is worth this? It is a crime to have robbed this boy of his father, to have taken from him this ordinary dream that every child should be able to realize.

The only war I could possibly justify is one fought in the most extreme of circumstances when there is no other choice between liberty and death for our nation.  And the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq are certainly not such wars. And if you ever read anything written in anger here at the injustice of such conflicts, I hope readers opposed to my views will remember this post and this radio documentary before you judge me for intemperateness or whatever other charge you might wish to lay at my doorstep.

It is ironic, but somehow fitting that this show be broadcast on Thanksgiving weekend when we are giving thanks for the things we have. It is also important precisely at this time that we remember those who have given up something precious that they can never get back.

Listen to the podcast of the radio program here.

Could Army Have Offered Hassan Way Out Short of Deployment?

Saturday, November 14th, 2009

In my first reporting on the Ft. Hood shooting I noted how counter-productive the Army’s regulations seemed in this particular case in which you had an officer desperate to leave the service but who couldn’t because of the service’s financial commitment to him.

NPR’s Liz Halloran has taken up a similar angle in a report on the use of conscientious objector status in similar situations.  Apparently, Maj. Hassan contacted the Center on Conscience and War to ask whether the Army might honor such an application from him.  The answer was negative for reasons explained in the NPR report.  But what I found especially interesting was the Center director’s comment on the damage that was done in Ft. Hood because the service did not have a means to respond to this particular individual’s religious needs and convictions:

McNeil argues that if Hasan’s concerns about fighting Muslims had allowed him a different path in the military — even short of a conscientious discharge — last week’s events may have been avoided.”If he had been told that they were going to put a mark on his record, and keep him from advancing but never deploy him, they would have had an extremely well-trained psychiatrist still working for them,” she says, “and they wouldn’t have a bunch of dead bodies in Fort Hood.”

New Profile Threat to Israeli Militarist Consensus

Friday, May 29th, 2009

Recently, I met with an Israeli peace activist here in Seattle who shared with me his perspective on the role of the intelligence services within Israeli society. As an example of the noxiousness of their impact, he pointed to the recent arrest of the leadership of the New Profile movement by the Shin Bet. New Profile is a feminist anti-militarist group with encourages young people to resist conscription.

Given the importance of military service to Israel both from a security stand point as well as for social cohesion, any organized effort to resist such conformity would be seen in the most severe light by hardline security hawks. This explains why the Shin Bet came down so hard on virtually the entire national leadership of the group:

On 26 April, a day before Israel’s Memorial Day, Israeli police produced an absurd piece of political theatre – as Dimi Reider first reported here last Thursday. As if facing down dangerous organised criminals, they raided the homes of six activists in different parts of Israel, who were then detained for interrogation. Exploiting the emotions roused on a day of mourning for military dead, the police action singled out and branded anti-military activists as outside the legitimate Israeli community.

At the time of writing, police have summoned 10 additional activists for interrogation. The activists targeted are members of New Profile, a feminist movement working for over a decade to reverse the militarisation of state and society in Israel.

The truth of the matter is that Israeli society, and especially Israeli youth, are gradually casting off previous cultural and social norms.  Service in the IDF, once expected of all except yeshiva students, is no longer a sine qua non of Israeliness.  Throngs of young Israelis seek ways to avoid service.  Some leave the country if they can.  Some seek to game the system.  Others resist more forcefully and publicly.

Those who refuse have many motivations.  Some simply don’t want to be put in harm’s way.  Some object to the Occupation and refuse to participate in a system that perpetuates it.  Some motives are pure, some are less so.  But the truth of the matter is that the system is gradually breaking down.  It’s like Humpty Dumpty sitting on that wall.  When he falls, no amount of Shin Bet repair is going to put him back together again:

For years now, the army has regularly been exempting tens of thousands from service without difficulty…Their worry today is rather the popular vote of no-confidence in their easy use of the lives of soldiers – an anger no longer limited to alienated, impoverished parts of society but spreading deep into the middle class as well.

The growing legitimisation of the draft resisters in the Israeli mainstream is also evidence of the weakening of the hold fear has on our society. Those in power…are struggling to keep in place this longstanding means of obscuring political corruption and of feeding the notion of “national unity” in the form of “the people’s army”.

In her Comment is Free post, Rela Mazali, a co-founder of New Profile correctly notes that the group is merely a convenient whipping boy for the military-intelligence establishment:

According to Ha’aretz, the criminal investigation of New Profile is motivated by “growing concern at the defence establishment of a growing trend of draft evasion”. It is not New Profile that is worrying them, we are just an easy scapegoat through which they hope to sow fear and intimidate future draft dodgers.

My lunch companion told me that groups like New Profile are routinely infiltrated by the Shin Bet.  Especially if the group is seen as effective in promoting its goals as New Profile undoubtedly is.  You can bet that someone informed on all the leaders who were arrested.  I don’t know this for a fact.  But any spook worth his salt would say that NOT to infiltrate New Profile would be a dereliction of duty for the Israeli intelligence apparatus.  That’s how warped their thinking is.  A group of pacifist women are a threat to the state.  Imagine.

And what do the Israeli powers-that-be really fear?  Not just an attempt to break down the consensus regarding military service, important as that is; they also fear New Profile’s ultimate goal which is to struggle for a truly democratic civil society that will be fully inclusive of Jews and Arabs.  This scares the pants off them.  For them, this is the same as attempting to destroy the State of Israel as they know it.  Of course, it is nothing of the sort.  But the very idea that New Profile suggests an Israel based on different principles than those endorsed by the political/military/intelligence elite is deeply threatening.

I remember how the U.S. establishment reacted during the Vietnam War to draft resistance and other forms of civil disobedience and unrest.  Fists and billy clubs flew, shots were fired, young people died in places like Kent State and Orangeburg.  It was a frightening time.  The powers that be refused to concede to any young person the right to refuse to obey.  My hope is that just as this country absorbed some of the positive lessons offered by anti-war activists here, so too Israel will come to understand that New Profile and groups like it have valuable insights to offer that will make Israel a more just, more democratic, more peaceful society.  Amen.