Mahzor

New York Public Library

Churches

Sarajevo Haggadah

Mah Nishtanah

Sarajevo haggadah

Antaea Darom

Israeli women's art

Action

Torah as music

Ben Heine

Action

ceramic bowl

Mohammad Said Kalash, "Offering Reconciliation" exhibit (photo: Ilan Amihai)

Action

Punch and Judy/Pinchas and Jamila

Avi Katz

Action

David Grossman

Ben Heine

Action

Eldrige Street shul

Lower East Side

Action

Dove

Ben Heine

Action

Two birds

Hoda Jamal

Action

Israeli and Palestinian boys

from documentary, Promises

Action

Cat in the Hat

Yiddish version

Action

Daylight through the Wall

Banksy: graffiti art on Separation Wall

Action

Maurice Sendak's Brundibar set

New Victory Theater (photo: Nan Melville/NYT)

Action

Daniel Barenboim, West-Eastern Divan Orchestra

Palestinian-Israeli musical ensemble (photo: Kerstin Joensson/AP)

Action

Great Day on Eldrige Street

N.Y.'s klezmer greats celebrate shul rededication (photo: Leo Sorel)

Action

Joint Appeal for Peace

(Avi Katz)

Joint Appeal for Peace

Ketubah, Ancona, Italy (1772)

(Jewish Theological Seminary library)

Ancona ketubah

Posts Tagged ‘civilian deaths’

Israeli Ministers, IDF Commander to Honor Racist Rabbi

Monday, July 4th, 2011
rabbi dov lior

Rabbi Dov Lior, 'Beloved of the Settlements,' honored by ministers Eli Yishai, Bogie Yaalon and IDF commander (Flash90)

Just yesterday I wrote a post in which I called the police interrogation of Rabbi Dov Lior for incitement a “charade,” since the authorities cannot nor will not do anything meaningful to address the savagery and violence of his views against Palestinians and Israeli democracy.  He supports the murder of Palestinian children and yesterday Yisrael HaYom quoted him as calling Israeli democracy, the “idol worship of our time.”  The article quoted a supporter attacking the “Bolshevik government” which “kidnapped” the holy rabbi for questioning.

Now comes news (h/t to Dena Shunra) that the Hebron settler council will honor Lior (Hebrew) with the “Beloved of the Settlements” award.  That’s certainly nothing unusual.  But who will be guests of honor at this glorious simcha?  None other than deputy prime minister and former chief of staff Bogie Yaalon, Interior minister and Shas party leader Eli Yishai, and the current IDF commander for the West Bank.  Not only will they appear, but they will speak in the rabbi’s honor.

This is either a country in the midst of a schizoid identity crisis or else it’s a country that’s only fooling itself when it says it embraces liberal western values of democracy and human rights.  These are mere words.  By their actions, the power loci of the Israeli elites show what they really “cherish” and value.

Though Bibi may use his most grave voice when proclaiming that “no Israeli is above the law” in claiming to support such police questioning, who does Israel think it’s fooling?  This moral munchkin and spiritual mentor of the Jewish terror underground, is an exemplar of not just the Israeli rabbinate or the settler movement, but he figuratively dances at the weddings of the Israeli élite.  He is their darling.

IDF Killed 65 Year Old Grandfather Sleeping in Bed: ‘Oops.’

Wednesday, January 19th, 2011
amr qawasme idf murder

Amr Qawasme's widow in bed where IDF murdered him (AFP)

In a rather extraordinary, because rare, development the IDF discharged a soldier because he murdered a 65-year-old sleeping Palestinian, Amr Qawasme, while in his bed.  What’s bizarre about the case is that the first soldier who shot at Qawasme was found to have acted according to regulations because he sensed a movement and “believed his life was in danger.”  The second soldier shot apparently because his comrade had.  And yet only the second man gets the axe.

Personally, I think the whole thing stinks.  Recently, IDF soldiers killed a Palestinian boy holding a bottled drink in his hands.  At first they wounded him, then approached and seeing he was wounded but not dead, and that he wasn’t armed, finished him off with lethal shots.  They were found justified because they too were ‘afraid for their lives.’  Don’t ask them how a drink bottle becomes a lethal weapon except in the mind of the scared 20 year old Israeli recruit patrolling among an alien people he views as his enemy.  Perhaps it was the world’s first suicide vest in a bottle.

So why does the first soldier above who fired get off scot-free, while the second who perhaps thought he was protecting his comrade gets the ultimate punishment.

Why not discharge the commanding officer who didn’t ask Qawasme’s wife after they barged into their home whose home they were in?  If they had, they’d have discovered that their intelligence was inept and that they’d forced their way into the wrong home (the real suspect lived one floor below) and killed the wrong man.  And why only discharge the first shooter?  In the IDF, the discharge is considered the real punishment because they’d never actually send a killer like this to jail.  After all, he only killed a Palestinian and they’re all the enemy anyway.

In a related development, the Jerusalem Border Police who pursued a Palestinian driver, Ziad Jilani, after he sideswiped their patrol car and executed him while he was unarmed and face down on the pavement, were found to have done nothing wrong.  The case was dropped “for lack of evidence.”  They have the executioners.  They have videotape from stores along the way.  They have the corpse with a bullet through the face shot at close range.  What evidence are they lacking?

On a positive note, Israeli peace activists tell me that at the demo called by the settler right at Rabbi Arik Ascherman’s home today, they outnumbered the settlers four to one.  Ascherman will be traveling to a Palestinian village tomorrow to celebrate Tu B’Shvat by replanting trees uprooted by the same settlers who attempted to intimidate him by assaulting him in his own home.  Settlers would rather commit their crimes with no Israeli Jews watching.  Hence the effort to intimiate Rabbi Ascherman.  Uprooting Palestinian orchards is viewed by settler thugs as “redeeming the land of Israel.”

Death in Bilin: IDF Doctors Found ‘Prolonged Exposure’ to CS Gas Lethal

Thursday, January 6th, 2011
idf teargas in bilin

Teargas clouds in Bilin: prolonged exposure can cause death (Oren Ziv/Active Stills)

The Forward publishes today an eye-opening follow-up to the Jawaher Abu Rahme story.  It seems that the IDF’s own doctors published a study in an academic journal noting that the type of CS gas used in the Bilin demonstrations could be lethal:

A 2003 article published by four Israeli army doctors in Archives of Toxicology noted that CS gas…causes tearing and burning for about 15 to 30 minutes, and this is lessened if people are moved into fresh air. The army has insisted on the safety of CS beyond these immediate effects. But the Israeli army doctors’ article noted, “At high concentrations, enclosed spaces, or prolonged exposures, severe side effects may occur and human deaths…have been reported.”

A 2009 article in the British Medical Journal came to similar conclusions, noting that tear gas is “not a gas at all, but a toxic chemical irritant.”

Instead of examining the circumstances under which the IDF prepared and conducted its teargas barrage on unarmed Palestinian protestors to determine whether something might have led this particular incident to be more lethal than others, the IDF obfuscates by insinuating that Abu Rahme really died of cancer or asthma or that she wasn’t even at the protest (she was in fact 150 feet away near her home, but the massive flow of teargas engulfed her and her mother).

You remember the standard definition of insanity: repeating the same failed action in the belief that next time it will work.  In that light, and after reading that the army’s own doctors warned of such lethal effects from CS, we must call the IDF’s approach to policing the Bilin demonstration certified insanity:

The Israeli military source says the army does not plan to change its methods. A statement released by the spokesman noted: “The tear gas used by the IDF, like all other riot dispersal means, is checked rigorously before being put into active use. During the approval process, the device passed all the necessary tests and approvals.”

You have to wonder whether IDF spokespeople are merely idiots or whether there’s some sort of method to their stupidity.  Of course, the tear gas and rifle launchers worked as advertised.  The problem wasn’t mechanical.  The problem was the human beings (let’s be charitable, shall we) who determined to use the gas in such a way that it not only can, but will likely kill people.  The Forward article notes that at least one other such demonstrator died from tear gas inhalation, so Jawaher wasn’t the first.

Really, when you come right down to it, the IDF doesn’t give a crap about the lives of the Palestinians they kill (or the ones they don’t).  If they cared and felt they’d be held accountable for this massive shande, they’d behave differently.  You could even argue that the IDF is happy to kill them, perhaps thinking mistakenly it might be a deterrent to others who fear for their lives.  But I’d argue that these deaths and the furor they arouse inside and especially outside Israel will fuel, rather than quell the unrest in Bilin and along the route of what should be called the Land-Grab Wall.

Israel’s supporters grow apoplectic when you talk about the need for international justice and arresting Israeli generals and sending them to the Hague.  But what else can you do?  There can be no justice in Israel.  What judge has the stomach to look an IDF sergeant in the eye and call him a killer for firing tear gas canisters at Palestinians?  Let’s be real.  The only way to get justice is to go outside Israel.  Only an international court has the distance and resolve to judge these issues fairly.  I, like Richard Goldstone, would like to see Israel police itself, investigate and punish itself for the deeds of the guilty.  But it ain’t gonna happen.

Speaking of mendacious, underhanded IDF spin, Yossi Gurvitz writes a masterful post exposing the hitherto unidentified army source who spewed so much trash about Jawaher, which was eaten up by the Israeli media.  Gurvitz noted the two-pronged strategy of IDF media manipulation: the official spokesperson says little and notes there is an investigation.  But the senior army commander speaking anonymously trash talks about the dead woman.  This way, when his speculation and spin are exposed for the lies they are, the IDF can fall back on the official position and claim it never really officially said any of the things reported from the general’s mouth.  It really has to be read to be believed.

As Martin Luther King would remind us were he alive to do so, Israelis aren’t the only ones culpable for this death.  We all are.  Our own U.S. government exported this lethal agent to Israel and gave its blessing for use against defenseless Palestinian civilians.  A U.S. company manufactured this product and helped kill Jawaher as well.  In fact, I was delighted to hear that the day after her death, Israeli activists threw empty tear gas canisters collected in Bilin at the home of the U.S. ambassador outside Tel Aviv.  We should lay the weapon that killed Jahawer right at his doorstep and demand an answer from the government as to what it plans to do to ensure such murder doesn’t happen again.  So far things aren’t looking good in that vein:

Asked to comment on Israel’s use of the tear gas, a State Department representative told the Forward, “The United States expects any recipient of U.S. defense articles to use those items in accordance with the terms and conditions of any U.S. transfer.”

Israeli diplomatic sources said Israel had not, so far, received any inquiries from Washington regarding the use of tear gas in the Bil’in incident.

Well, Mr. State Department representative, just what are the “terms and conditions” of U.S. transfer?  Do they say that U.S.-made CS may be used to quell non-violent Palestinian demonstrations and kill innocent women?  As for the Israeli response, if the U.S. hasn’t “inquired” about this killing and our role in it they damn well should.  What do we pay you for, Madame Secretary (Clinton)??

IDF: Palestinian Civilian Killings=300; Military Prosecutions=0

Tuesday, September 14th, 2010

From 2006-2009, over 1,700 Palestinian civilians were killed by IDF fire in the Occupied Territories.  Leaving aside non-combatant deaths attributed to Operation Cast Lead, that leaves over 600 killings.  Of those, the Israeli human rights NGO demanded an investigation into 300 of these deaths.  Of these, how many do you think resulted in a military prosecution?  Ten?  Five?  One?  Would you believe, none?  Yes, I know you would you cynic.

The ever intrepid B’Tselem with impeccable timing calibrated to the Israeli-Palestinian peace talks underway today in Sharm, reports the shameful news (Haaretz news article and full report in pdf) that the IDF military prosecutor does a miserable job of investigating and prosecuting wrongful civilian deaths:

Soldiers who killed Palestinians in the Occupied Territories are almost never held accountable, even if the circumstances raise a grave suspicion that they acted criminally…The army refrains, as a rule, from conducting a Military Police investigation in cases in which soldiers kill Palestinian civilians. In addition, the research shows that the Judge Advocate Generals’ Office routinely procrastinates in making decisions on files for many months, even years.

A word of explanation: the army does conduct an investigation (or more accurately a report) of such killings, but it is done in the field by the unit which committed the act.  You can imagine what kind of report will result from this sort of cozy self-interest.  Before the second Intifada, the IDF held a formal investigation of every such killing.  But then it stopped doing so, by classifying the Territories as in a state of “armed conflict,” which essentially meant that they were an ongoing battlefield.  This left the policing of such incidents in the hands of the commanders in the field.

Of the 600 deaths, B’Tselem demanded a formal military investigation into the deaths of half these civilians.  In only 15% (23) of the cases, did the military police open an investigation.  In the rest, it either declined or has yet to make any decision.  In those few cases when it did agree to investigate it did so after inordinate delay, thus impairing the investigation.  It isn’t unusual for a year or more to elapse from the date of the incident.  After the police complete their investigation and forward it to the military prosecutor for a decision on whether to charge anyone another delay of months or years ensues.  Finally this most telling statement from B’Tselem on its rate of success:

None of the cases in which B’Tselem referred to the JAG’s office led to criminal charges.

The Israeli NGO further analyzes the reasoning behind the IDF’s unwillingness to investigate itself:

…Investigations are not opened even where there is a grave suspicion that the law has been broken. Also, analysis of the files shows that the authorities’ interpretation of the events is based solely on the results of an operational inquiry and the statements of the soldiers, without any reliance on the eyewitness testimony of other persons and on other evidence that contradicts the soldiers’ position…This policy grants immunity to soldiers and officers,

Some of my readers will undoubtedly shrey about how mean and one-sided my reporting is concerning Israel and the IDF, which I of course dispute. But if you want to avoid reading posts like this do what you have to do to instill a discipline of accountability within the IDF. Reinstitute formal military investigations for every civilian killing, investigate them seriously, prosecute a few, send a soldier to prison once in a while. Then you may not have to read reports or posts like this one.

A final note: there were several egregious incidents in which civilians were killed and the circumstances were so blatant (the Aramin murder is one example) that the IDF DID open its own investigation without the prompting of B’Tselem. These few cases were not counted towards the numbers in the group’s report since it never requested an investigation.

Border Policeman Admits Shooting Jilani at Point Blank Range, U.S. Consulate Offers Widow Little Help

Monday, June 28th, 2010
ziad jilani

Ziad Jilani after shooting by Israel Border Police (Maan Images)

NOTE: I apologize to readers for posting such a graphic image here.  I do not normally do so.  But under the circumstances I do not want to cover this story without people seeing what really happened to Ziad Jilani.

Three weeks ago, an Israeli border police officer shot and killed Palestinian Ziad Jilani execution-style after a hit and run accident involving a squad of four police officers.  After first reporting the police version of the incident that Jilani was a terrorist attempting to kill police, the Israeli media, in the person of Amira Hass, put forward a far more credible report claiming that a border policemen approach a wounded Jilani who was lying in the street and shot him in the head from point-blank range.

The Justice Ministry has begun an internal investigation and Jilani’s body has been exhumed and an autopsy will be done.  As part of the investigation, the murder scene and entire incident were reconstructed.  During this event, the shooter admitted, according to Haaretz’s report (Hebrew), that he shot Jilani at point-blank range.  He claimed, however, that he believed Jilani was a terrorist and killed him because he feared he was wearing a suicide vest.  Further, he claimed he fired to protect the lives of innocent bystanders.

ziad and moira jilani

Ziad and Moira Jilani in happier times

There are a few problems with his account.  First, by approaching Jilani so closely he could clearly see he was NOT wearing such a vest.  Second, proper training for such an incident (and common sense) demand that an officer not approach a potential suicide bomber at close range so as not to be blown up if a detonation occurs.  In other words, only a suicidal Israeli policeman would get that close to a potential bomber (or a policeman who knew the victim was NOT a bomber).  Third, it should’ve been clear from Jilani’s two previous wounds (one in his back) that if he did have a suicide vest, these bullets would’ve detonated it.  Fourth, no border policeman would care for the lives of the Palestinians living in Wadi Joz where the killing occurred.  In fact, several residents went to Jilani’s assistance before he was killed and according to their accounts they were beaten by the police and shoved aside.

This is all a pack of lies spread like manure by the Israeli border police, one of the most brutal, homicidal of all Israel’s police and military forces.  They are always spoiling for a fight and relish them when they come their way.  It would be just like them to escalate a minor car accident into a cold-blooded murder.

The Border Police spokesperson presented a laughable response:

This incident showed all the signs of a terror attack.  We take great pains to educate our officers about the purity of arms.  It’s simply not possible that a soldier who did not sense danger would shoot someone at point-blank range.

In a far more credible statement, the lawyer representing Jilani’s surviving family told Haaretz:

This was a car accident and nothing more.  This isn’t someone who boarded a bus with a bomb and they attempted to shoot him in the head to prevent him from harming others.  Under no circumstance would it be permissible to shoot him at point-blank range.  Without any doubt, this was murder.

Jilani’s widow is an American citizen.  As such, she is entitled to the services of the U.S. consulate in East Jerusalem.  Alas, the consulate’s response has been lackadaisical and sullen at best.  After an inquiry from Jilani’s sister, a U.S. citizen living in California, Congressman Brian Bilbray wrote to the consulate.  The response by Consul Debra Towry was typical CYA bulls(&t.  She claimed falsely that a list of attorneys was offered to the family.  The truth is that the family was forced to hire its own attorney with no help whatsoever, and certainly no list proffered, from the consulate.  The consul noted in her letter to Bilbray that a consular representative attended the first legal hearing into Jilani’s death.  This is true.  But they only did so after the widow begged them to do so.  Note in the consul’s letter to Bilbray she refuses to commit to attending future hearings:

…We [will] try to attend future hearings whenever possible.

In fact, the consulate continually told the widow there was nothing they could do to help her.  This is a response that Palestinian-American U.S. citizens are used to getting from our diplomats in Israel.

After the murder, the police canvassed the neighborhood and confiscated any video footage documenting it.  That will certainly never be seen again.  However, and possibly unbeknownst to the authorities, there is footage they didn’t manage to get.  I have not seen it yet.  But I have been advised that it presents a powerful graphic and visual record of what really happened.  Rodney King anyone?  Of course, the difference between the two incidents is that in Los Angeles there was a conscience that could be troubled by the beating.  In Israel, there is no such thing.  The number of Israelis who will be shocked, scandalized or even troubled by this murder is very small.  The majority will justify it as an unfortunate necessity given the terror war Israel confronts.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Romancing the Settlers and Their Stones

Wednesday, December 16th, 2009
Your tax dollars and mine support the hate spewed by this rabbi (Flash 90)

Your tax dollars and mine support the hate spewed by this Od Yosef Chai yeshiva rabbi (Flash 90)

Yesterday, Akiva Eldar published another installment in his powerful expose of the most extreme of the settler yeshivas and their funding sources both from the government and American Jewish donors.  He focussed on the Od Yosef Chai yeshiva, based in the viper nest settlement of Yitzhar, located near Tapuach, from which the pogromists who torched the Yasuf mosque came.  The yeshiva has several claims to fame.  One, a student once launched a homemade Katyusha rocket at a nearby Palestinian village.  Two, the yeshiva is a hesder, or educational institution that trains future IDF soldiers.  Its rabbis have consistently advocated mutiny and insubordination by telling students to refuse legal military orders to evacuate settlements.  Three, one of the yeshiva rabbis published a book last month which advocated the killing of non-Jews (read, Palestinians) who threatened Jews, including children because they would grow up to harm Jews:

The rabbi said it is permissible to kill gentile babies because of “the future danger that will arise if they are allowed to grow into evil people like their parents.”

Four, the yeshiva receives $300,000 in state funding for its role as a hesder institution.  Five, it receives large charitable gifts from Diapora Jewish communities in the UK and U.S.  Those gifts are tax-deductible despite the fact that the yeshiva not only encourage violation of the Israeli military code, hatred of Muslims and Palestinians, but also flies in the face of U.S. policy regarding the settlements:

…The American public also participates in financing the message coming out of Yitzhar. It [the Israeli government charity filing] states that in 2007 and 2008, the yeshiva received NIS 102,547 ($25,000) from an American foundation known as the Central Fund of Israel (CFI).

My own review of IRS 990 reports shows that CFI gave $22,000 to “Friends of Yitzhar” (page 28, see link below) in the 2005 reporting year.  In that same year, the Fund broke out its giving by category (pdf) noting nearly $400,000 for “security programs” (page 30), which would fund the militias and other violent hooligans running rampant in settlements like Yitzhar, Tapuach and elsewhere.

Jewish charities in the UK have even deeper pockets.  The Charitable Commission report for 2006 (pdf) reports (page 8) the Od Yosef Hai Yeshiva College for Rabbinic Studies donated approximately $600,000 to the Yitzhar yeshiva.  The fund’s total tangible assets are listed at approximately $5-million.  Didi Remez tells me that the 2007 Israeli charity report lists one of Britain’s wealthiest and most distinguished Jewish charitable funds, the Wolfson Foundation, as a $20,000 donor.

We may not have much leverage with a U.S. government frightened of its own shadow to take on pro-settler charities, but Britain seems more sensitive on these issues.  I urge our British peace activist counterparts to inquire into this matter with the relevant British authorities.  The government backed out of a Tel Aviv real estate deal with settler-builder Lev Leviev.  It also just acceded to a request to distinguish Israeli food exports from the Territories from Israeli products from within the Green Line.  We might have more luck exploring this from Britain than from Washington DC.

I hope to God someone in the Obama administration is reading these wise words and taking them to heart:

…The next time the White House spokesman condemns the torching of a mosque near Nablus, some reporter ought to ask him why respectable American citizens contribute to the Od Yosef Chai Shechem yeshiva, one of whose leading rabbis wrote the following incendiary words of incitement: “[Civil] Administration inspectors have not dared to enter Yitzhar since the freeze edict. Their experience with Yitzhar, and its heat, are responsible for the fact that every entry into the settlement by hostile elements requires large forces and ends with extensive damage to army and police equipment, even greater damage to Arab persons and property, and a region that continues to burn in every direction for several days” (Rabbi Yosef Elitzur, Hakol Hayehudi, December 4, 2009).

At the same time, U.S. officials could consider how a tax exemption for donors to Friends of Ateret Cohanim and The City of David jibes with official American policy regarding the presence of right-wing Jewish organizations in the heart of Palestinian neighborhoods in Jerusalem’s Holy Basin.

Human rights organizations and Jewish peace activists in the United States…are asking why the administration only shuts down funds that send charitable donations to associations affiliated with Hamas.

The Arab-American Anti-Discrimination Committee has started the ball rolling with this wide-ranging IRS/Treasury Department complaint.

IDF Drones Murder 48 Gaza Civilians

Wednesday, March 25th, 2009
IDF drone used to kill 48 Gaza civilians (Guardian video)

IDF drone used to kill 48 Gaza civilians (Guardian video)

The Guardian has published a searing investigative report (watch the video and be prepared to feel outrage) charging the widespread use of unmanned drones to attack Gazan civilians during the recent war.  Given that the IDF itself notes the precision optics used in the drones which allow clear identification of, and discrimination among targets, the reporter charges that the IDF knowingly attacked civilians.  Doing so constitutes a violation of the laws of war.

Here is the story of one particular attack on a Gazan family sipping tea in their courtyard:

Mounir al-Jarah slowly takes down the bricks he used to wall up the entrance to his sister’s courtyard. Inside, flesh still clings to the walls; blood-soaked furniture and family items lie broken and mangled.

Mounir’s eyes search around the old house as he recounts the events of 16 January, when a rocket fired from an unmanned aerial vehicle killed his sister, her husband and four of her children.

Photo of Nour al-Jarah, killed with five family members while having tea

Photo of Nour al-Jarah, killed with five family members while having tea

Sitting around drinking tea with the family in their small courtyard, Mounir heard the loud buzzing of an Israeli drone, clearly visible in the sky above. He went inside for a moment and, as he returned, he saw a ball of light hurtling down toward him. There was a loud explosion and he was thrown backward. He gathered himself and stumbled out into the courtyard, where he saw the scene he says will never leave him.

“We found Mohammed lying there, cut in half. Ahmed was in three pieces; Wahid was totally burnt – his eyes were gone. Wahid’s father was dead. Nour had been decapitated. We couldn’t see her head anywhere.”

All six members of the family had been blown to pieces, coating each wall of the narrow enclosure with blood and body matter.

“You cannot imagine the scene: a family all sitting around together and then, in a matter of seconds, they were cut to pieces. Even the next day we found limbs and body parts on the roof, feet and hands,” Mounir says.

Fatheya, 17, is one of the few surviving members of the family. Slipping further into grief-stricken madness, flitting from one horrific description to the next, she says: “There were rocks and dust and fire … It’s very difficult … I can’t, no matter how I try to explain my situation to you, picking up the pieces of my dead family … I couldn’t handle it, limbs and flesh all around me. What have we done to deserve this?”

Fatheya al-Jarah, sole family survivor of IDF drone attack

Fatheya al-Jarah, sole family survivor of IDF drone attack

There will be Israel pro-war apologists who attempt to explain away stories like this by claiming we’re only hearing the victims’ side of the story.  But the Guardian reporter notes a ready and sure defense for Israel: let the IDF publish the videotapes the drone took during the attack to prove whether or not this family is hiding something.  Tellingly, the IDF refused to respond to the Guardian’s report.

Apologists may also claim that this incident constitutes a single unfortunate error.  The only problem with this excuse is that the Guardian counts 48 Gaza civilians killed in multiple drone attacks.

Hearing the IDF’s tepid defense is infuriating:

“The IDF operated in accordance with the rules of war and did the utmost to minimise harm to civilians uninvolved in combat. The IDF’s use of weapons conforms to international law.”

In the IDF world, when everyone else in the world sees blue, the IDF can not only claim to see green, but it can  essentially bluff its way pretending that the rest of the world is wrong in seeing blue and that only it can see the true color is green.  In the end, it doesn’t matter that it is blue, since the IDF acts as if it is green and nothing can dissuade it of that fact.

Clearly, the IDF is lying through its teeth.  It deliberately murdered civilians not only in this case, but many others documented both here and the world media.  It did nothing to minimize harm to civilians.   In fact, its rules of engagement gave unprecedented leeway to attack targets whether they be military or civilian.  The Dany Zamir-Oranim IDF testimonies make this abundantly clear.

Further, Amira Hass reported recently the retrieval of an Israeli commander’s combat briefing notes from a destroyed Gaza home.  Among the telling facts revealed is that troops were directed to fire on unarmed Palestinian civilian resucers.  In fact, at least 18 such medics were killed during the war BECAUSE they were deliberately targeted.  Such attacks on rescue personnel, documented during the war, caused numerous civilian victims to die of untended wounds.  The officer’s notes also seem to indicate that soldiers were directed to shit in the houses, as he writes.  Gazans have widely reported that their homes, when they weren’t destroyed outright, were trashed.  Soldiers’ feces and urine were left as souvenirs for the survivors to find when they returned.  Earlier reports by soldiers indicate that they spat on personal family photographs in the homes which they commandeered, thus leaving a charming momento of their stay.

I find it humorous (in a dark, bleak sort of way) that the IDF attempts to explain this away by claiming that soldiers bivouacing in Gazan homes were told to relieve themselves in places in which they would not be endangered, which meant that sometimes soldier’s did so in unsanitary ways.  Yeah, right.  Apparently, they’ve never gone on a backcountry camping trip in which you pack out everything you brought in, including your own waste.

The Guardian also reports that Human Rights Watch is now calling for a war crimes investigation of the IDF’s use of white phosphorus in Gaza.

War crimes were committed in Gaza.  While I would consider Palestinian shelling of civilians leading to Israeli deaths also to be war crimes which merit investigation and charges, the overwhelming preponderance of criminality lies on the Israeli side.  The UN is currently considering opening an investigation into such charges.  I believe it is urgently necessary for Israelis and Diaspora Jews to join this call and insist on an independent investigation of Gaza war crimes.  Let us give the Israeli government the opportunity to mount a full-fledged investigation (independent of the IDF).  If it chooses not to do so, the UN must step in and do the job.

I would be willing to join with other bloggers and peace activists on such a campaign.

Children of 5767

Sunday, September 30th, 2007
burma gaza cartoonMan reading newspaper says: “Those poor Burmese monks!” while the TV set shows “Gaza.” (cartoon: Daniella London-Dekel/Haaretz)

On Rosh Hashana, Jews do cheshbon nefesh, a spiritual accounting of their deeds during the previous year. The purpose of course is to do t’shuva and “return” from our misdeeds and set out on a new path. Gideon Levy has done his own literal accounting of the Palestinian child dead for the past year in his most recent Haaretz article, Twilight Zone–the Children of 5767. This is the kind of reckoning we all wish to avoid. But I hope you will not avoid Levy’s searing article. Those who do, are like the Israeli fretting in his breakfast nook over the bloodied Burmese monks while soldiers representing him enforce a festering Occupation on their Palestinian neighbors:

It was a pretty quiet year, relatively speaking. Only 457 Palestinians and 10 Israelis were killed, according to the B’Tselem human rights organization, including the victims of Qassam rockets. Fewer casualties than in many previous years. However, it was still a terrible year: 92 Palestinian children were killed (fortunately, not a single Israeli child was killed by Palestinians, despite the Qassams). One-fifth of the Palestinians killed were children and teens – a disproportionate, almost unprecedented number. The Jewish year of 5767. Almost 100 children, who were alive and playing last New Year, didn’t survive to see this one.

…We set out each week in the footsteps of the fighters, in the West Bank and the Gaza Strip, trying to document the deeds of Israel Defense Forces soldiers, Border Police officers, Shin Bet security service investigators and Civil Administration personnel – the mighty occupation army that leaves behind in its wake horrific killing and destruction, this year as every year, for four decades.

And this was the year of the children that were killed. We didn’t get to all of their homes, only to some; homes of bereavement where parents weep bitterly over their children, who were climbing a fig tree in the yard, or sitting on a bench in the street, or preparing for an exam, or on their way home from school, or sleeping peacefully in the false security of their homes.

A few of them also threw a rock at an armored vehicle or touched a forbidden fence. All came under live fire, some of which was deliberately aimed at them, cutting them down in their youth. From Mohammed (al-Zakh) to Mahmoud (al-Qarinawi), from the boy who was buried twice in Gaza to the boy who was buried in Israel. These are the stories of the children of 5767.

The first of them was buried twice. Abdullah al-Zakh identified half of the body of his son Mahmoud, in the morgue refrigerator of Shifa Hospital in Gaza, by the boy’s belt and the socks on his feet. This was shortly before last Rosh Hashanah. The next day, when the Israel Defense Forces “successfully” completed Operation Locked Kindergarten, as it was called, leaving behind 22 dead and a razed neighborhood, and left Sajiyeh in Gaza, the bereaved father found the remaining parts of the body and brought them for a belated burial.

…The day after Rosh Hashanah we traveled to Rafah. Dam Hamad, 14, had been killed in her sleep, in her mother’s arms, by an Israeli rocket strike that sent a concrete pillar crashing down on her head. She was the only daughter of her paralyzed mother, her whole world. In the family’s impoverished home in the Brazil neighborhood, at the edge of Rafah, we met the mother who lay in a heap in bed; everything she had in the world was gone. Outside, I remarked to the reporter from French television who accompanied me that this was one of those moments when I felt ashamed to be an Israeli. The next day he called and said: “They didn’t broadcast what you said, for fear of the Jewish viewers in France.”

Soon afterward we went back to Jerusalem to visit Maria Aman, the amazing little girl from Gaza, who lost nearly everyone in her life to a missile strike gone awry that wiped out her innocent family, including her mother, while riding in their car. Her devoted father Hamdi remains by her side. For a year and a half, she has been cared for at the wonderful Alyn Hospital, where she has learned to feed a parrot with her mouth and to operate her wheelchair using her chin. All the rest of her limbs are paralyzed. She is connected day and night to a respirator. Still, she is a cheerful and neatly groomed child whose father fears the day they might be sent back to Gaza.

For now, they remain in Israel. Many Israelis have devoted themselves to Maria and come to visit her regularly. A few weeks ago, broadcast journalist Leah Lior took her in her car to see the sea in Tel Aviv. It was a Saturday night, and the area was crowded with people out for a good time, but the girl in the wheelchair attracted attention. Some people recognized her and stopped to say hello and wish her well. Who knows? Maybe the pilot who fired the missile at her car happened to be passing by, too.

…And what did 16-year-old Taha al-Jawi do to get himself killed? The IDF claimed that he tried to sabotage the barbed-wire fence surrounding the abandoned Atarot airport; his friends said he was just playing soccer and had gone to chase after the ball. Whatever the circumstances, the response from the soldiers was quick and decisive: a bullet in the leg that caused him to bleed to death, lying in a muddy ditch by the side of the road. Not a word of regret, not a word of condemnation from the IDF spokesman, when we asked for a comment. Live fire directed at unarmed children who weren’t endangering anyone, with no prior warning.

…In Nablus, we documented the use of children as human shields – the use of the so-called “neighbor procedure” – involving an 11-year-old girl, a 12-year-old boy and a 15-year-old boy. So what if the High Court of Justice has outlawed it? We also recorded the story of the death of baby Khaled, whose parents, Sana and Daoud Fakih, tried to rush him to the hospital in the middle of the night, a time when Palestinian babies apparently mustn’t get sick: The baby died at the checkpoint.

…Bushra Bargis hadn’t even left her home. In late April she was studying for a big test, notebooks in hand, pacing around her room in the Jenin refugee camp in the early evening, when a sniper shot her in the forehead from quite far away. Her bloodstained notebooks bore witness to her final moments.

And what about the unborn babies? They weren’t safe either. A bullet in the back of Maha Qatuni, a woman who was seven months pregnant and got up during the night to protect her children in their home, struck her fetus in the womb, shattering its head. The wounded mother lay in the Rafidiya Hospital in Nablus, hooked up to numerous tubes. She was going to name the baby Daoud. Does killing a fetus count as murder? And how “old” was the deceased? He was certainly the youngest of the many children Israel killed in the past year.

Happy New Year.

Indeed. Thanks to Sol Salbe for sharing the cartoon.

Performance Optimization WordPress Plugins by W3 EDGE