Muslim and Jewish Women in Nazareth

'We can live in peace'...John Lennon (photo: Dafna Tal)

Mahzor

Mahzor

New York Public Library

Churches

Sarajevo Haggadah

Mah Nishtanah

Sarajevo haggadah

Antaea Darom

Israeli women's art

Action

Torah as music

Ben Heine

Action

ceramic bowl

Mohammad Said Kalash, "Offering Reconciliation" exhibit (photo: Ilan Amihai)

Action

Punch and Judy/Pinchas and Jamila

Avi Katz

Action

David Grossman

Ben Heine

Action

Eldrige Street shul

Lower East Side

Action

Dove

Ben Heine

Action

Two birds

Hoda Jamal

Action

Israeli and Palestinian boys

from documentary, Promises

Action

Cat in the Hat

Yiddish version

Action

Daylight through the Wall

Banksy: graffiti art on Separation Wall

Action

Maurice Sendak's Brundibar set

New Victory Theater (photo: Nan Melville/NYT)

Action

Daniel Barenboim, West-Eastern Divan Orchestra

Palestinian-Israeli musical ensemble (photo: Kerstin Joensson/AP)

Action

Great Day on Eldrige Street

N.Y.'s klezmer greats celebrate shul rededication (photo: Leo Sorel)

Action

Joint Appeal for Peace

(Avi Katz)

Joint Appeal for Peace

Ketubah, Ancona, Italy (1772)

(Jewish Theological Seminary library)

Ancona ketubah

Posts Tagged ‘christians-united-for-israel’

Elie Wiesel, Moral Mercenary

Tuesday, February 9th, 2010

Wiesel, Hagee and Israeli minister Uzi Landau (within whose retinue several Mossad agents are reputed to have entered Dubai to assassinate a Hamas operative)

Did you know morality is for sale?  No?  Well, as far as Elie Wiesel is concerned it is.  If the Palestinians had $500,000 THEY might find moral favor in Elie’s eyes as well.  You see, since Bernie Madoff blew Wiesel’s foundation assets, I guess he’s found a need to sell his scruples to the highest bidder.  Last year that would’ve been John Hagee, before whose Christians United for Israel conference Wiesel pronounced the anti-Semite and homophobe his “dear pastor” (see video):

For delivering one speech to Hagee’s congregation, Wiesel received a check for $500,000 toward his foundation, according to Marita Styrsky, the wife of Christians United for Israel Eastern Regional Director Victor Styrsky (Christians United is Hagee’s lobbying arm).

To be fair, CUFI wouldn’t call this an honorarium or speaker’s fee.  For them it was a donation for a good cause.  But you and I both know that were it not for the cool half-mill, Elie would’ve told Hagee to take a powder.

It makes you wonder what and who might be paying (if anyone is) for Wiesel’s activism against Iran?  Or is that based on “pure” moral principles as opposed to mercenary moral principles?  Perhaps Ahmadinejad ought to invite Wiesel to give a lecture in Teheran for a mill.  Maybe Wiesel would change his point of view.

And the next time you hear of some good deed performed by the Elie Wiesel Foundation remember it’s probably funded by a man who said that Hitler was half-Jewish and doing the work of the Lord, John Hagee.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Jerusalem Post, Australian Zionists Dump Chazan

Friday, February 5th, 2010

Haaretz reports that the Israeli rightist Jerusalem Post has dumped Naomi Chazan’s column in that newspaper.  The editor refused to elaborate when asked.  Clearly, this is connected to Im Tirtzu’s campaign of vilification against Chazan and New Israel Fund, which I’ve covered extensively here.  The only progressive commentators left there are Gershom Baskin and Larry Derfner.  I know it’s tough to tell a fellow journalist to harm their own livelihood, but the honorable thing for both of them to do would be to resign as well.  How can a progressive columnist continue to publish at a newspaper that falls prey to the most scurrilous, disgusting calumny?  I urge you to contact David Horovitz, the editor, and tell him what an ass he and his paper are (well, use more polite words–you know what I mean).

The Haaretz report also unmasks the radical right-wing pro-settler agenda of Im Tirtzu:

Im Tirtzu is trying to cast itself as a centrist movement…however, a Haaretz probe found that the influential forces behind the movement make no secret of their rightist political loyalties. Financially, Im Tirtzu is supported by a foundation that has contributed to radical right-wing organizations such as the Women in Green; Pastor John Hagee, the head of Christians United for Israel (CUFI) which contributed to Im Tirtzu, has been implicated in the past by a number of anti-Semitic statements.

Ideologically, the movement’s chairman Ronen Shoval used to be spokesman of the “Orange Cell,” a student chapter at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem that fought against the disengagement from the Gaza Strip and supported the settlement project. Shoval was even honored for his efforts with a citation from the evicted settlement block of Gush Katif.

The main channel for donations to Im Tirtzu is the Central Fund of Israel. In addition to Women in Green and Im Tirtzu, it supports Honenu, an organization sponsoring legal defense to radical right-wing activists in trouble with the law. Honenu boasts of financially supporting the families of the Bat Ayin underground, convicted for trying to bomb a girls’ school in East Jerusalem in 2002; of Ami Popper, who shot four Palestinian laborers during the first intifada; Yishai Schlissel, an ultra-Orthodox man who stabbed participants in a Gay Pride parade in Jerusalem in 2005; and Haggai Amir, brother of Yitzhak Rabin’s assassin Yigal Amir. Im Tirtzu’s Web site asks donations to be sent through the American foundation.

Shoval maintained yesterday that the American foundation’s services were used for technical reasons only. “We’re a small organization, and a small organizations needs a tax break for the donations it gets,” he said yesterday. “CFI is an organization that sends money to scores, if not hundreds, of Israeli organizations, left and right. Donations to it are tax deductible, and this is the only reason why we work with them. I am not familiar with their activities and I haven’t studied their organization in depth.”

Honenu, the group mentioned above, also attempts to get Jewish terrorist prisoners freed from prison including Yigal Amir, killer of Yitzhak Rabin.

Shoval is lying about CFI.  It supports NO left-wing Israeli groups.  None.  It is an Orthodox pro-settler funder and only supports explicitly Orthodox or settler organizations.  Jay Marcus, president of CFI lives in Efrat, a settlement.  I challenge Shoval to point to a single organization legitimately characterized as left wing that CFI has ever supported.  I’d challenge him to point to any Israeli Orthodox progressive groups CFI has supported.  There are such groups, but none on CFI’s grantee list.

I find this defense of Im Tirtzu’s acceptance of funding from Christian Zionist firebrand John Hagee to be disingenuous in the extreme:

…We’re not financially well-off enough to say no to money, even if the source doesn’t perfectly match my personal world view.”

The source perfectly matches his world view on the only issues that matter: hatred of Palestinians and affirmation of the God-given right of the Jewish people to maintain control of Greater Israel.  As for Hagee’s anti-Semitism, well, that’s not Shoval’s problem since he doesn’t live here and have to hear it and read it regularly in the media.

Of course non-profits have the option of turning down a gift from a source with which they disagree.  Would Im Tirtzu accept donations from Palestinians? Or a neo-Nazi group?  Of course not.

And more disingenuousness:

“Im Tirtzu is not a right-wing movement, I don’t see myself as a right-wing person, and it’s important for me this is said.”

It may be said, but that doesn’t mean it will be believed.  Why should he be when Haaretz notes:

Shoval himself published a large number of articles, all carrying explicitly rightist views.

Such as this Haaretz op-ed proclaiming the inviolability of settlements as an inherent part of the State of Israel:

The root of the problem…is the prevalent conception of the political, state and defense establishment, which says you can defend Gush Dan without the protective wall of Judea and Samaria.”

Shoval called Ariel Sharon “the worst prime minister” because he evacuated the Gaza settlements.  Yet this charlatan wants readers to see his organization in the same Zionist context as Likud, Kadima or Labor.  You ain’t foolin’ anyone, Shoval.  We can see right through ya.  When I read steaming horse manure like this I’m reminded of the hilarious line from Hester Street: “You can’t piss on my back and make me think it’s rain.”

I’m guessing that Im Tirtzu is merely a launching pad for a political career for the Shoval lad.  He’ll probably be on Likud’s new party list for the coming election.  And he’ll be a bright new voice.

The Australian Reform Movement, the Union for Progressive Judaism, also rescinded an invitation to Chazan to speak there.  The amount of distortion in the following shameful passage is astonishing:

According to ZCV [Zionist Council of Victoria] President Dr. Danny Lamm, news of the report…on Im Tirtzu’s Web site, had generated angry responses throughout the Melbourne Jewish community and the decision was made to withdraw Chazan’s invite.

“The activities of the NIF are anathema to Zionist groups such as ours, and frankly, we’re just not interested in having anything to with it,” Dr. Lamm told the Post by telephone from Melbourne on Tuesday.

“It’s not new to me, or many of us, that the NIF has supported groups that have damaged Israel and will continue to do damage to Israel, but others were surprised by this,” he added.

Lamm made it clear that the Zionist Council of Victoria represented all branches of Jewish political and religious affiliation, “from Likud to Meretz” and that they would “never bar anybody from the left just as they wouldn’t bar anyone from the right.

But the sort of stuff the NIF supports is so far removed from the community here,” Lamm added, saying “it was decided that Chazan’s public appearances be canceled.”

What I find so astonishing is that Lamm would believe that it was NIF that was extremist and not his own views. NIF is really a liberal Zionist group plain and simple. It’s views are glatt kosher as far as doctrinal Zionism is concerned. So for Lamm to contend that his group includes Meretz, but NIF is somehow farther out there to the left is simply unbelievable. The man doesn’t know what he’s talking about. Yet another example of the Diapsora Jewry have to be holier than the [Zionist] pope.

Actually, the Australians may’ve done Chazan a favor because at the rate the Shin Bet is going in criminalizing human rights work in Israel, they might not have allowed her back into the country on her return, deeming her to be a subversive security risk.  And who would the Shin Bet rely on to form this opinion?  Ronen Shoval and his friends at Im Tirtzu, of course.

UPDATE: I’m so tickled with the letter Sol Salbe features in the first comment below that I just had to note the irony that Australian Zionists have imposed their own academic/political boycott on Israelis of whom they don’t approve.  So what the BDS movement couldn’t achieve (yet) Australian Zionists HAVE.  Mazel tov.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Israeli Rightist Ad Assaulting New Israel Fund, Too Much Even for Hagee

Tuesday, February 2nd, 2010

I feel a bit like I’m Alice in Wonderland and John Hagee is the Mad Hatter.  Today, he conceded that there is pro-Israel nationalist rhetoric that even embarrasses HIM.  He was referring to this Der Shturmer-like ad smearing Naomi Hazan.  Apparently, he didn’t cotton to J Street’s tying his previous anti-Semitic remarks to Im Tirtzu’s hateful anti-peace rhetoric via a $200,000 gift to the latter from his Christians United for Israel:

Im Tirtzu’s political leanings are clear. This is a pro-settler group, with $100,000 of funding from Christians United For Israel, a conservative Christian Zionist organization run by Pastor John Hagee, who once stated that God sent Hitler to drive Jews to Israel.

JTA is the source of this fascinating news.  But not willing to earn credit for breaking such a great story, it typically puts its foot into it by being far too credulous in accepting the veracity of right-wing Jewish sources.  Clearly, the CUFI publicist, Ari Morgenstern, fed the JTA reporter a pro-Hagee line and he accepted it hook line and sinker.

First, the reporter alleges that J Street’s attack on CUFI for its gift to Im Tirtzu is the same type of “guilt by association” used by Im Tirtzu against the New Israel Fund (i.e. blaming NIF for the actions of its grantees in cooperating with Goldstone).  This is utter nonsense and clearly fed to JTA by CUFI.  J Street’s goal was to indict Im Tirtzu.  CUFI was merely a tool for it to do so.  If J Street had intended to impugn CUFI there are far more powerful tools than a $200,000 donation to use–like Hagee’s own misbegotten words.

JTA’s second error caused by accepting CUFI’s PR line, is this inaccurate rebuttal of the J Street quotation above:

The [J Street] statement cit[ed] an eschatological analysis from the late 1990s that Hagee has since repudiated.

Bruce Wilson and Rachel Tabachnick, the activist founders of Talk2Action, rebut this claim by noting that Hagee made this statement in 2005 and has never repudiated it.  In fact, they have the video to prove it.  The only ‘repudiation’ that happened was John McCain renouncing Hagee’s presidential candidacy endorsement just after Talk2Action released the video footage.  I have also blogged about this Hagee sermon here.

CUFI’s Ari Morgenstern seems to be the PR flack of choice for the far-right pro-Israel lobby groups.  He mixed it up here with a Shelly Adelson-funded former client by claiming the latter promoted the film Obsession, only to have the client deny it, after which Morgenstern dropped a dime on her.  I love it when the pro-Israel right turns on each other and (proverbial) blood runs in the streets.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Hagee Funds Israeli Nationalist Group Attacking NIF and Hazan

Monday, February 1st, 2010

If You Will It--the Zionist nationalist nightmare

Didi Remez brings word today that the Israeli far-right nationalist group Im Tirtzu, which began a scurrilous campaign against Israeli NGO support for the Goldstone Report, receives major funding ($100,000) from Chrisitian Zionist John Hagee’s Christians United for Israel.  Didi translates an article by Danit Gottfried (Hebrew) from Walla, the popular Israeli internet news portal, which notes:

…An investigation by Walla! found that some of the funding for Im Tirtzu itself comes from parties that are not regarded with fondness or agreement by the Jewish public. Donors to the movement include the Christian American lobby CUFI – Christians United for Israel, headed by evangelist preacher John Hagee. The organization’s website specifies the sum it gave Im Tirtzu — $100,000.Hagee was in the headlines in 2008 during the US presidential campaign, when a recording circulated in which he claimed that “Hitler was fulfilling God’s will, to return the Jews to the land of Israel according to the biblical prophecy.” Right after the radical comment, Republican presidential contender John McCain had to repudiate Hagee’s public support. Additionally, in his book “Who Is a Jew?” Hagee claims that “Hitler was half Jewish, from the descendents of Esau,” and that “the Holocaust happened because the Jews rebelled and denied the real God.” He claimed that “Jewish rebelliousness is the reason for the anti-Semitism and persecution they suffered over the years.”

About the economic crisis that hit the US and the world in 2008, Hagee said that “the U.S. Federal Reserve is under the control of a few shareholders, including the Jewish Rothschild family.” He added that “the Rothschild family is part of an extensive economic conspiracy by strong shareholders who reside in Europe.” Hagee is considered a controversial and extreme figure among the Jewish communities in America, after he called the Reform Jews “poisoned” and “spiritually blind.”

Im Tirtzu's tax-deductible donations via Central Fund for Israel pass-through

Didi also informs me that American Jewish tax-deductible support for Im Tirzu comes via the Central Fund for Israel, one of the largest of the U.S. charitable funds supporting extremist settler groups and the Israeli far right nationalist community.  Yet another example of why the IRS must review these groups’ non-profit status for their attempts to criminalize the legitimate role of Israeli human rights NGOs within Israeli democracy.

Folks, I know we thought the Bush regime launched an all assault on civil liberties over the past eight years, but think of it: they never threatened to criminalize the activities of the ACLU.  They never attempted to bankrupt it or put it out of business.  That’s what the Shin Bet, Israeli government and Im Tirzu would do if they had their druthers.  Bush-Cheney didn’t send right-wing hooligans to demonstrate outside the private home of the ACLU’s national board chairman.  They didn’t publish ads with the board chair’s image and a claim that he or she is a traitor to this country.

A few months ago, a distinguished Hebrew University professor opened his apartment door to a bomb blast that could have killed him.  The bomb was planted by Jack Teitel, according to Israeli authorities.  If Teitel could, from his prison cell, he’d give a thumbs up to those who are maligning Naomi Hazan and NIF.  Who knows, the next Jack Teitel may be lurking in the crowd outside her home.

The alliance between anti-Semite Hagee and anti-democracy Im Tirtzu is an unholy one.  Let’s not let them live it down.

An earlier part of the Israeli far rights anti-NGO campaign involved an attack on EU funding sources for some of the human rights groups.  Anti-democratic thugs like Avigdor Lieberman bellowed about foreigners interfering in Israel’s sovereign internal affairs.  The clear notion was that pro-democratic NGOs were a foreign graft on the Israeli root stock and further that they were anti-democratic because they opposed the policy of a democratically elected Israeli government.  If Lieberman has the right to make such odious complaints about foreign funding, then we have even more right to question why Im Tirzu accepts anti-Semitic blood money from John Hagee.

More on Ben Caspit, the sleazy Maariv journalist who’s served as the conduit for these attacks on NIF:

Caspit called Goldstone “a despicable liar who stood at the head of a lethal and well greased anti-Israeli and anti-Semitic propaganda machine.” When Caspit was asked by Walla! News whether he knew about Hagee’s contribution to Im Tirtzu, he replied that he [refuses interviews with] Walla!

Im Tirzu deflected criticism of its acceptance of funding from CUFI with a counterattack of its own:

“Our movement is supported by Zionists who hold Israel as a Jewish state dear, including CUFI…

Another question that will also be answered soon is who finances it and what are the interests behind their donations, and we need to say no more.”

Well, I’m going to make a gift right now to NIF and I urge you to do so too.  Let ‘em question my credentials as a Jew and supporter of Israel (not THEIR Israel).  Even if you don’t necessarily agree with my views on this particular issue, I hope you’ll understand that this is an all-out assault on free speech and democratic values and must be answered with the full weight of our outrage and support for Israeli democracy.  By the way, this is precisely the kind of attack that the neocon Jewish right launched against J Street when the former cried that the group was accepting funding from notorious Arabs and other enemies of the state of Israel.  It didn’t work against J Street here and it won’t work against NIF there.

Just as on Hanukah we say “a great miracle happened there,” let’s remind the right wing Jewish demagogues that we have the miracle of democracy in the American Jewish community (here) and in Israel (there) and we won’t let the merchants of hate destroy either one.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

StandWithUs: On the Side of the [Financial] Angels

Monday, November 2nd, 2009

Eli Clifton has written a terrific piece of investigative journalism uncovering the financial sugar daddies and mommies of StandWithUs, the pro-Israel “truth squad.”  He notes the irony that SWU and others like Lenny Ben David, the former political enforcer for Aipac, have called J Street to task for accepting funding from Arabs, while SWU itself accepts funding from wealthy American Jews who support the worst forms of racist attack on Muslims:

…An IPS investigation into the tax records of the donors to StandWithUs, which professes to be ideologically neutral, found a web of funders who support organizations that have been accused of anti-Muslim propaganda and encouraging a militant Israeli and U.S. foreign policy in the Middle East.Some of these organizations have tied the origins of Palestinian nationalism to Nazi ideology, and suggested that a vast Muslim conspiracy — in a similar vein to the anti-Semitic Protocols of the Elders of Zion — is mobilizing to undermine the U.S. constitution and impose Sharia law.

SWU’s annual budget is around $3.4 million.

Among such donors are Susan Wexner, heiress to the Wexner family clothing empire, who contributed $850,000 between 2005-2008:

Wexner also made contributions to the Middle East Media Research Institute (MEMRI), the Committee for Accuracy in Middle East Reporting in America (CAMERA), and the Foundation for the Defense of Democracies (FDD).

…Critics say [MEMRI] is a propaganda outlet, and accuse it of mistranslation and overstating the prevalence of anti-Semitism in Middle East media.

Independently, I have verified that Wexner contributed $600,000 to an Israeli group aiding the settlers of Gush Katif, many of refuse to resettle permanently in protest of their forced evacuation from Gaza.  She’s also one of those who believes there’s no left or right when it comes to Israel, but that there is only one morally correct position–being pro-Israel.

Returning to MEMRI, Roz Rothstein’s defense is touching, if self-serving and inaccurate:

“MEMRI is used by every news publication on the planet. People don’t look at MEMRI as right-wing. It’s just verbatim Arabic translation. They’ve never been cited for inaccurate translation.”

In 2007, CNN correspondent Atika Shubert and Arabic translators accused MEMRI of mistranslating portions of a Palestinian children’s television program.

“Media watchdog MEMRI translates one caller as saying — quote — ‘We will annihilate the Jews,”’ said Shubert. “But, according to several Arabic speakers used by CNN, the caller actually says ‘The Jews are killing us.”’

Wexner also supports CAMERA, a group which lies about the record of Palestinian Canon Naim Ateek, a leading Catholic anti-Occupation cleric:

CAMERA, another media watchdog group, has caught criticism for denying reliable reports of settlement expansions, leading the executive director of the Center for Middle Eastern Studies, Donald Wagner, to describe CAMERA as “a well-known source of extremist pro-Israel propaganda that is routinely challenged by Israeli and international human rights and peace organizations for its consistent misrepresentation of the facts in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.”

She has also supported the leading neocon think-tank, the Foundation for the Defense of Democracies:

The Foundation for Defense of Democracies is a policy institute “founded shortly after 9/11 by a group of visionary philanthropists and policymakers to support the defense of democratic societies under assault by terrorism and militant Islamism,” according to its website.

However, the group has frequently been cited for pushing a hawkish U.S. foreign policy in Iraq and Iran, and the Christian Science Monitor called it one of the “top neocon think tanks.

Another top SWU donor is the wealthy Los Angeles funder and Aipac powerhouse, Larry Hochberg, who’s given $400,000 to SWU:

Larry and Andrew Hochberg contributed over 400,000 dollars to StandWithUs since 2005 and also contributed to FDD and Honest Reporting, another watchdog group that monitors the media and “exposes cases of bias” against Israel.

Much like MEMRI, Honest Reporting has come under attack for taking words and phrases out of context and for producing the documentary “Obsession: Radical Islam’s War Against the West.”

Twenty-eight million copies of the film were distributed by direct mail and newspaper inserts before the U.S. presidential election last November.

Honest Reporting, Aish Hatorah and Clarion Fund share a cozy ideological relationship (two brothers run all three groups) supporting extremist settlements, Islamophobic films like Obsession and Third Jihad, and Judaizing East Jerusalem.  They were also involved in lobbying for John McCain’s presidential candidacy through one of their websites.  To this day, no one has been able to uncover who contributed well over $15-million to manufacture and disseminate these DVDs.

SWU’s third-largest donors are Lawrence and Susan Post who:

Contributed just under 70,000 dollars to StandWithUs since 2005 and contributed to MEMRI and Christians United For Israel (CUFI), a U.S. “pro-Israel” Christian organization founded and chaired by controversial pastor John Hagee.

Rothstein has the chutzpah to blow smoke up our rear ends with this disingenuousness:

Asked if the philanthropy of their donors reflected a right-wing political leaning by StandWithUs, Rothstein rejected the idea.

“I don’t think it’s fair since our tent is pretty broad,” she said. “Some people call us ‘left of center, others call us ‘right of center’ and some call us ‘center.’”

“We see it as our job to help people understand that the founding document of Hamas calls for the elimination of Israel,” Rothstein added. “If J Street is interested in negotiating with Hamas — who are absolute fundamentalists and violent — it’s like a phony dream to want to sit down with someone who is intending to kill you.”

Some, like me call SWU what it is: far right pro-Israel.  As for Hamas, J Street isn’t “interested in negotiating with Hamas.”  But it does, along with Israeli military and intelligence analysts like Ephraim Halevy and Lt. Gen. Shlomo Brom and many others see a pragmatic purpose to Israel remaining open to talk to Hamas.  In fact, an Israeli poll found that Israelis themselves were willing to have their government talk to Hamas if it would help free Gilad Shalit or guarantee a ceasefire.  Which means that SWU is a Likudist, far-right phenomenon.  No one should be confused by Roz Rothstein’s smokescreen.  She ain’t just pro-Israel.  She’s pro-Likud and pro-settler.  And Eli Clifton’s investigation puts a few more nails in the group’s ideological coffin.

Eli also makes clear that each of these and other donors could have contributed much more than the amounts he discovered if they gave through donor directed funds or other means which would have concealed their specific connection to the contribution.

Pro-Israel Neocons Right at Home at CUFI National Conference

Monday, July 20th, 2009


As you read this, John Hagee’s Christians United for Israel is hosting its annual conference in Washington, DC. It’s instructive to see which Jewish “leaders” and organizations have made common cause with this anti-Semitic slimeball.

On Monday, David Makovsky (Dennis Ross’ best buddy) and Jennifer Lazlo Mizrahi (Frank Luntz’s best buddy) whipped up a nice bit of hysteria about Iran’s alleged commitment to Israel’s destruction.  Let’s not forget that Jennifer’s hubby is a top Israeli diplomat in town.  Gary Bauer, the president of CAMERA, and the director of the International Christian Embassy Jerusalem gave a workshop on Israel 101: Basics of the Israeli-Arab Conflict, which should be retitled “Basic Hasbara of the Israeli-Arab Conflict.”  Forcibly retired U.S. senator Rick Santorum and David Frum did a dog and pony show on U.S.-Israel relations (that should be illuminating–yawn).

If you’d only been there last night, you could’ve been illuminated by the cumulative wisdom of Rep. Eric Cantor and Michael Medved speaking to the select wealthy few at the Chairman’s Club Donor Banquet.  Just think how smart you’d be after hearing those two illuminati speak.

If you hurry, you might still be to catch Fred Barnes, Rep. Shelley Berkley (Aipac’s most slavish boot-licker in Congress), and Malcolm Hoenlein (still thinks Obama’s a Muslim) give a Mideast Briefing.  Can you think of anything more toxic than to hear these blowhards talk on a subject about which they know nothing more than what’s in their hasbara playbook?

Buy your tickets now for the Night to Honor Israel Banquet Dinner at which you will be regaled by the sound and fury of John Hagee and Dennis Prager.  What, they couldn’t get Rush to join them?

Jewish neocons and fundamentalist Bible Belters: a match made in heaven!  To quote Tevye: “May the Lord bless and keep them–far away from me.”

Meanwhile, one of the funniest satirical pieces I’ve read in a long was written by Justin Vogt about last year’s CUFI conference.  Here’s a sampling:

At this year’s CUFI gala, beneath a stage framed by massive American and Israeli flags, the country-music star Randy Travis belted out The Star-Spangled Banner. Cornerstone’s choir performed a Dixiefied version of Hava Nagila, the celebratory Hebrew folk-song (“Chicken in the barn, pickin’ up grain/ It don’t matter if it’s sunny or rain / Next year in Jerusalem! / Ve nis’mecha!”) And a jumbo-sized cinema screen bombarded the audience with an infomercial touting the work of the evening’s proud corporate sponsor, Zion Oil & Gas, a company founded by a Hagee supporter who believes that the Bible contains clues that point the way to plentiful deposits of oil in Israel. (“The geology has confirmed the theology,” explained one executive.)

Kristol Flacks for Lieberman-McCain Ticket

Monday, August 25th, 2008

Note: this post contains some material excerpted from a post written yesterday.

Bill Kristol, the doyen of neocon chatterati, has given his imprimataur to a McCain-Lieberman ticket in a column in today’s N.Y. Times:

…McCain…could decide that Obama’s conventional pick of Biden allows him to seize the moment by making a bold choice. He could select the person he would really like to have by his side in the White House — but whose selection would cause palpitations among many of his staffers and supporters: the independent Democratic senator from Connecticut, Joe Lieberman.

Lieberman could hold his own against Biden in a debate. He would reinforce McCain’s overall message of foreign policy experience and hawkishness. He’s a strong and disciplined candidate.

But he is pro-abortion rights, and having been a Democrat all his life, he has a moderately liberal voting record on lots of issues.

“Bold choice?”  Perhaps bold in the context of the conservative Republican voters McCain needs to carry in November who think of a Democrat as a cross between Count Dracula and Judas.  But among the general election cohort, Joe Lieberman is about as bold a choice as that other Joe–Biden.  One could even paraphrase Rambam’s epitaph (l’havdil): from Joe to Joe there is none like Joe.

Kristol seems to think that Lieberman will carry independent voters and even Hillary supporters:

Obama and Biden will try to frame the presidential race as a normal Democratic-Republican choice. If they can do that, they should win. That would be far more difficult against a McCain-Lieberman ticket. The charge that McCain would merely mean a third Bush term would also tend to fall flat. And an unorthodox “country first” Lieberman selection would reinforce what has been attractive about McCain, and what has allowed him to run ahead of — though not yet enough ahead of — the generic Republican ballot.

A Lieberman pick should help with ticket splitters…

And Hillary supporters could protest Obama’s glass ceiling by voting for John McCain and the Democratic Party’s 2000 vice presidential nominee.

Actually, were he to run again in Connecticut for senate he wouldn’t even win there.  How is he supposed to help elsewhere?  Lieberman is damaged goods, not just for traditional Democrats but for most centrist Americans.  Maybe he’d attract the votes of those who support the Iraq war, but McCain already has the 100-year-war cohort locked up.  And the notion that Hillary supporters, drawn to her as a pioneering woman candidate, would turn to an old, white, male Tweedle-dee and Tweedle-dum to redeem Hillary’s values is little short of preposterous.

But the most troubling aspect of choosing Lieberman is the recent news reported by Justin Vogt in The National that Lieberman, at last month’s Christians United for Israel gala, tacitly urged Israel to attack Iran. Considering Kristol’s column, it becomes even more urgent that Lieberman’s comments be more widely reported:

Though careful to say he hoped war with Iran could be avoided, the senator ended his address with a Biblically-coded call for military action against the Islamic Republic. According to the Book of Exodus, God was saying to Moses and the Israelites [at the Red Sea], ‘The time for prayer is over. It’s time for Israel to act.’”

…There comes a moment when faith and prayer must be followed by action right here on Earth,” Lieberman concluded. Coming on the heels of his dark warnings about Iran, there was no mistaking the kind of Israeli action Lieberman had in mind.

I think this speech justifies the question: does Lieberman see Israel as a U.S. surrogate? That is, a nation which has none of the strictures preventing it from taking actions Lieberman and the U.S. wish they could take.  This raises another legitimate question: if McCain wins the presidency, will Israel will receive a green light to attack Iran?  This is an issue the American people should know about in considering which candidate they vote for in November.  If McCain wins, you can expect a nudge-nudge, wink-wink arrangement between his Administration and Israeli generals who’re fully prepared to teach Iran a lesson–at least in their minds.  Whether they can pull it off is something about which even Israeli specialists and military analysts have raised serious doubt.

Do Americans really want a potential vice-president who communicates to Israel that it would be acceptable to attack Iran, and does so at a convention of religious whack jobs and wingnuts (read Vogt’s story if you don’t believe me)?  And lest anyone argue that Lieberman hasn’t been picked for this post yet, I’d reply that Lieberman clearly has McCain’s ear and even if he isn’t vice-president, he will be a very close advisor (secretary of state or defense?) over the next four or, God help us, eight years should the Republican candidate win.

Lieberman: ‘Time for Israel to Act’ Against Iran

Sunday, August 24th, 2008

Joe Lieberman addresses "A Night to Honor Israel" CUFI gala

Joe Lieberman addresses 'A Night to Honor Israel' CUFI gala despite 40,000 Jews who said 'Don't go, Joe'


In all the coverage of Joe Lieberman’s address to the Christians United for Israel gala last month, only Justin Vogt, writing for The National, seems to have noticed that Lieberman tacitly called for Israel to attack Iran.  Considering that this man may be John McCain’s running mate in a few days or weeks, I can’t understand why this story hasn’t gotten more play:

Though careful to say he hoped war with Iran could be avoided, the senator ended his address with a Biblically-coded call for military action against the Islamic Republic. According to the Book of Exodus, when faced with Pharaoh’s army behind them and the Red Sea in front of them, the Israelites panicked…

“But God…said to Moses, ‘Why do you cry out to me? Speak to the children of Israel and tell them to go forward.’ In other words, God was saying to Moses and the Israelites, ‘The time for prayer is over. It’s time for Israel to act.’”

…A tribal leader called Nachshon took the initiative and leapt into the Red Sea. “Nachshon understood that there comes a moment when faith and prayer must be followed by action right here on Earth,” Lieberman concluded. Coming on the heels of his dark warnings about Iran, there was no mistaking the kind of Israeli action Lieberman had in mind.

I think this speech justifies the question: does Lieberman see Israel as a U.S. surrogate? That is, a nation which has none of the strictures preventing it from taking actions Lieberman and the U.S. wish they could take.  This raises another legitimate question whether, if McCain wins the presidency, Israel will receive a green light to attack Iran.  This is an issue the American people should know about in considering which candidate they vote for in November.  If McCain wins, you can expect a nudge-nudge, wink-wink arrangement between his Administration and Israeli generals who’re fully prepared to teach Iran a lesson–at least in their minds.  Whether they can pull it off is something about which even Israeli specialists and military analysts have raised serious doubt.

An important theme of Vogt’s story is the competition that has developed between AIPAC and the new Jewish kid on the block, J Street.  The reporter manages to elicit a lot of over-reaching and chest-thumping by AIPAC operatives and boosters.  This is characteristic of the genre:

“AIPAC represents the organised Jewish community,” argued Robert Asher, a former AIPAC president and a member of the “Gang of Four”. “And we are the only organisation that is recognised that way.”

There you have it in a nutshell.  All the hubris.  All the hegemonic pretensions.  And this from a group supported, according to a recent J Street poll, by only 38% of American Jews.  AIPAC aims to suck all the air out of the Jewish room.  Thank God, J Street won’t let ‘em.

Vogt managed also to tease out a lot of the unintentionally comic aspects of the CUFI conference.  In case you didn’t know this, Israel has oil and the Bible tell us so:

…A jumbo-sized cinema screen bombarded the audience with an infomercial touting the work of the evening’s proud corporate sponsor, Zion Oil & Gas, a company founded by a Hagee supporter who believes that the Bible contains clues that point the way to plentiful deposits of oil in Israel. (“The geology has confirmed the theology,” explained one executive.)

And this is the outfit about which Lieberman said:

“The bond I feel with Pastor Hagee and each and every one of you,” he told the audience, referring to the campaign to pressure him, “is much stronger than that [any opposition raised by J Street], and so I am proud to stand with you tonight!”

Do you want a potential vice-president who communicates to Israel that it would be acceptable to attack Iran, and does so at a convention of religion whack jobs and wingnuts?  And lest anyone argue that Lieberman hasn’t been picked for this post yet, I’d reply that Lieberman clearly has McCain’s ear and even if he isn’t vice-president, he will be a very close advisor over the next four or, God help us, eight years should the Republican candidate win.