Mahzor

New York Public Library

Churches

Sarajevo Haggadah

Mah Nishtanah

Sarajevo haggadah

Antaea Darom

Israeli women's art

Action

Torah as music

Ben Heine

Action

ceramic bowl

Mohammad Said Kalash, "Offering Reconciliation" exhibit (photo: Ilan Amihai)

Action

Punch and Judy/Pinchas and Jamila

Avi Katz

Action

David Grossman

Ben Heine

Action

Eldrige Street shul

Lower East Side

Action

Dove

Ben Heine

Action

Two birds

Hoda Jamal

Action

Israeli and Palestinian boys

from documentary, Promises

Action

Cat in the Hat

Yiddish version

Action

Daylight through the Wall

Banksy: graffiti art on Separation Wall

Action

Maurice Sendak's Brundibar set

New Victory Theater (photo: Nan Melville/NYT)

Action

Daniel Barenboim, West-Eastern Divan Orchestra

Palestinian-Israeli musical ensemble (photo: Kerstin Joensson/AP)

Action

Great Day on Eldrige Street

N.Y.'s klezmer greats celebrate shul rededication (photo: Leo Sorel)

Action

Joint Appeal for Peace

(Avi Katz)

Joint Appeal for Peace

Ketubah, Ancona, Italy (1772)

(Jewish Theological Seminary library)

Ancona ketubah

Posts Tagged ‘christianity’

Why I’m Glad I Don’t Celebrate Christmas

Sunday, November 30th, 2008

Today, we went to the Westlake Mall to take our kids on the carousel and Monorail.  While taking a breather at one of the mall stores, a shop clerk wished my four year old a “Merry Christmas.”  He dutifully replied: “We don’t celebrate Christmas.  We’re not Christian.”  Whenever this type of thing happens I momentarily catch my breath.  First, because yet another Christian has made yet another assumption that we’re just the same as the 95% of Americans who are also Christian.  Second, because Jews just don’t like to call public attention to their “otherness.”  You just don’t know what will happen.  But my third reaction toward my son’s response was: “Good for you.  Give ‘em what for.  We’re not the same as the rest of you and proud of it too.”

It seems that every year around this time I write my anti-Christmas post.  And today is that day.  All this by way of introducing what is likely to be one of the strangest stories of this holiday season. This isn’t really meant to be a Christian-bashing post as much as a Christmas-bashing post.  And not bashing Christmas as a religious holiday, but rather as a holiday of rampant consumerism.

No doubt you’ve already heard this bizarre story.  If not, it will shock and horrify you.  I simply don’t understand how 2,000 can become a frenzied pack of animals–and all in the search for Christmas bargains:

Shoppers started lining up late Thursday night at the Wal-Mart, at the Green Acres Mall on Sunrise Highway in Valley Stream…The throng of Wal-Mart shoppers had been building all night, filling sidewalks and stretching across a vast parking lot at the Green Acres Mall in Valley Stream, N.Y. At 3:30 a.m., the Nassau County police had to be called in for crowd control, and an officer with a bullhorn pleaded for order.

Tension grew as the 5 a.m. opening neared.

By 4:55, with no police officers in sight, the crowd of more than 2,000 had become a rabble, and could be held back no longer. Fists banged and shoulders pressed on the sliding-glass double doors, which bowed in with the weight of the assault. Six to 10 workers inside tried to push back, but it was hopeless.

Suddenly, witnesses and the police said, the doors shattered, and the shrieking mob surged through in a blind rush for holiday bargains. One worker, Jdimytai Damour, 34, was thrown back onto the black linoleum tiles and trampled in the stampede that streamed over and around him. Others who had stood alongside Mr. Damour trying to hold the doors were also hurled back and run over, witnesses said

As if the story itself isn’t callous enough, the report continues:

Some shoppers who had seen the stampede said they were shocked. One of them, Kimberly Cribbs of Queens, said the crowd had acted like “savages.” Shoppers behaved badly even as the store was being cleared, she recalled.

“When they were saying they had to leave, that an employee got killed, people were yelling, ‘I’ve been on line since yesterday morning,’ ” Ms. Cribbs told The Associated Press. “They kept shopping.”

We all know that human beings are basically civilized animals and that at times the civilization is but a thin veneer. But even that knowledge doesn’t fully prepare us for animalistic savagery like this. How in heaven’s and Christmas’ name, can human beings behave like this? Don’t we have a soul? Where was it? It’s not like this was a European soccer match where people were killed in a mass stampede in narrow stadium hallways. These were people who deliberately mowed down the store doors and anyone who stood in their way.

It’s practically incomprehensible and makes me appreciate that as Jews we’re not part of this shopping frenzy. Yes, we do buy toys for our children. But we buy a lot less because we’re not buying for every family member as Christians do. I’ve always thought of this element of Christmas as slightly insane and these people have only confirmed my original impression. To kill someone for a Christmas bargain…what can you say?

And lest you think the shoppers alone were at fault, Wal Mart didn’t respond very admirably either. A mere eight hours after the horrible death of one of their employees they reopened the story so as not to miss out on an entire day of Christmas shopping season sales. Gee, you’d think they could, as a sign of respect, close down for an entire day. No, not Wal-Mart for whom the God of sales seems to reign supreme.

And don’t you just love a company which, when faced with a PR disaster, rolls up into fetal position and denies any culpability for the laxness of its procedures:

Hank Mullany, the senior vice president of Wal-Mart’s Northeast division, said in a statement that the company had hired extra security officers and installed barricades before the store opened, but “despite all of our precautions, this unfortunate event occurred.”

I guess he’s implying Wal Mart did everything any reasonable person would’ve expected of them and that this was just a random crazy accident. 2,000 people could line up in front of any store and turn into a frenzied mob and mow down every employee in sight. Who could’ve foreseen it?

This is pure lameness. Exactly how many security guards WERE on duty at that store that night and where were they? Why wasn’t the police called when the mob-like violence began.  If they were called, why weren’t they there?

Christian Evangelical Leaders Call for Two-State Solution

Sunday, December 30th, 2007

Well, glory be. Finally, Christian evangelical leaders who step forward with a pragmatic and realistic approach to resolving the Israeli-Palestinian conflict instead of the usual drivel from the John Hagees and Pat Robertsons of the evangelical world supporting a maximalist Israeli nationalist perspective. Thanks to Daoud Kuttab for pointing me to a terrific statement published last month in Christianity Today by 80 evangelical leaders. It reads in part:

In the context of our ongoing support for the security of Israel, we believe that unless the situation between Israel and Palestine improves quickly, the consequences will be devastating. Palestinians—especially the youth who have no economic opportunity—are increasingly sympathetic to radical solutions and terrorism. As a result, the threat to Israel’s security is now greater.

Likewise, the threat to America’s national security is greater. Because so many of the world’s 1.3 billion Muslims see America through the prism of Israel-Palestine, the longer the current situation continues, the more likely it is that anti-American attitudes, policies, and terrorist activities will increase dramatically among Muslims worldwide.

…The Bible clearly teaches that God longs for justice and peace for all people. We believe that the principles about justice taught so powerfully by the Hebrew prophets apply to all nations, including the United States, Israel, and the Palestinians. Therefore we are compelled to work for a fair, negotiated solution for both Israelis and Palestinians. We resolve to work diligently for a secure, enduring peace and a flourishing economy for the democratic State of Israel. We also resolve to work for a viable permanent, democratic Palestinian State with a flourishing economy that offers economic opportunity to all its people. We believe that the way forward is for the Israelis and Palestinians to negotiate a fair, two-state solution.

…We call on all evangelicals, all Christians, and everyone of good will to join us to work and pray faithfully in the coming months for a just, lasting two-state solution in the Holy Land. We call on all involved governments to work diligently toward this goal. And we covenant to pray for the leaders of all the nations engaged in this effort, hoping for them the blessing of our Lord, who said, “Blessed are the peacemakers.”

…We are empowered by the knowledge that until He comes again, He summons us to support the things that promote peace and justice for everyone in the Holy Land.

Given the high profile enjoyed by the Christian Zionist zealots thanks to their embrace by AIPAC, it is easy to forget that there are evangelicals who are clear-eyed in their analysis of the issues. We need to make common cause with them and to continually ask AIPAC why it chooses the lunatic fringe instead of leaders like the ones featured here.

Ry Cooder’s ‘My Name is Buddy’ to Be Released March 6th

Thursday, January 25th, 2007

I first met Ry Cooder’s music in 1969 through my best friend in high school, Rina Slavin, who had some of the best cultural taste around. She had an amazing Skip James record and whenever I heard that high-pitched wail of a voice it sent shivers up and down my spine. Rina also owned Paradise and Lunch and it was a revelation. I’d never heard anything like it. It was love at first hearing. I’ve gobbled up just about everything Ry’s done since as well.
my name is buddy ry cooder album cover
What’s Ry Cooder up to these days? It’s been two years since he released the remarkable Chavez Ravine, an enormous feat of musical and historical storytelling about L.A.’s vanished Hispanic neighborhood. While he was completing that album, Ry received a mysterious package from a friend containing little more than a faded newspaper clipping about a Vancouver cat who lived–and died–in a battered suitcase. So began the legend of Buddy the Cat. Cooder has imagined a life for good old Buddy, a rich, well-traveled life in which he’s rubbed shoulders with some of the great musical and political heroes of the 20th century movements for social justice. It promises to be a tour de force of the imagination.

Though this is an mp3 blog, unfortunately I don’t have an mp3 to share with you of the music from Buddy. But I have the next best thing. Ry’s publicist, Shore Fire, has a jukebox on their site which plays the terrific, gritty Three Chords and the Truth (what a great song title, no?). Helping Cooder on the vocals is (if my ears heard right) the country music legend Harlan Howard:

I dreamed I saw Joe Hill last night
Standing in the prison yard
They were taking poor Joe, chained and bound
To a Utah firing squad

Well, he turned and looked at me right then
Saying: “Don’t you be misled (?)
They’re trying to tear our free speech down
But Buddy ain’t near quit yet

They framed me on a killing charge
You know I wouldn’t lie to you
But the only crime here that I done
Was three chords and the truth”

Three chords and the truth
Well, the only crime that Joe Hill done was
Three chords and the truth

When he sang his good old union songs
He got his message through
But they couldn’t stand it, how a working man
Sang three chords and the truth

Ol’ J. Edgar Hoover liked to hear the Darkies sing
But one man changed that all around
Paul Robeson was a man that you couldn’t ignore
That’s what drove J. Edgar down
He called up his New York Klan-boy friends
Saying: “I got something good for you
Get right down there to Peekskill New York town
And kill three chords and the truth”

Three chords and the truth
Well, the only crime you ever got from Paul
Was three chords and the truth

If this is a land of democracy
I’ve got one question for you
Why wasn’t Paul Robeson set free
On three chords and the truth?

Now, they took Pete Seeger before the law
Put him on the witness stand
But he stood right up to tyranny
With just a banjo in his hand

Such a righteous banjo picker
Watchin’ out for me and you
That was just a man that wouldn’t back down
On three chords and the truth

Three chords and the truth
Well, the only crime Pete Seeger done
Was three chords and the truth

Yeah, he sang his freedom songs real good
Still gettin’ his message through
Better check out on Pete Seeger
On three chords and the truth

Three chords and the truth
Better check out your old friend Buddy right now
On three chords and the truth

Three Chords and the Truth, Ry Cooder

When you open the jukebox, you will have to keep clicking Next till you see Ry’s song.

The song is masterful, a tour de force of politically-engaged songwriting. Also, it’s sense of connectedness to America’s social history, along with its appreciation of the critical role played by America’s songwriters in that struggle, is extraordinary. This is one of the best political engaged songs since Steve Earle’s Christmas in Washington (hear it).

Yesterday, I went searching the net for information about the new record. Most sites contain only the basics. But Shore Fire, a public relations firm which seems to represent many progressive musicians including Ry does a bang up job of profiling both Cooder and his pending musical project. Those of you who’ve heard Ry Cooder speak or read one of his interviews will be used to his twisting, turning, ironic discursive style. It’s the talk of a mad genius. Those of you who’ve heard Ry’s music but haven’t had a taste of Ry, the eccentric are in for a wild and crazy ride.

Here is the description of the mysterious birth of the new project:

Not quite two years ago, Ry Cooder was knee-deep in some ninth-inning tinkering, finishing up his forthcoming album, Chavez Ravine, when a peculiar message sailed in – one could say – from deep out-of-left-field.

It arrived by way of U.S. Mail, slipped into a nondescript, manila envelope, addressed in an old friend’s recognizable scrawl. Inside, he found a familiar image of the great bluesman, Leadbelly. Yet, photo-shopped in place of his face was that of a red cat; an inscrutable, seen-it-all expression hovering in his eyes. He found little else, except a web address and this note: “You’ll know what to do with this.”

In that image of Leadbelly as Buddy, we can see the outlines of the tremendous American picaresque adventure Cooder imagines for his feline friend. To my mind, Buddy may enter the pantheon of American adventurers alongside those other mythic figures, Paul Bunyan and John Henry.

This is all we ever hear about the real-life Buddy:

After some initial poking around to learn this red cat’s name (“Buddy”) and a bit of his vagabond story (he was found in the alley behind a record store in Vancouver, living in a suitcase, and he’d passed away in 2005) he [Cooder] pushed it aside to tie up pressing loose ends. But the notion had already crawled up inside somewhere deep in his imagination.

Here the article describes how Cooder fleshed out both the musical and narrative profile of Buddy’s story. The political character of the story also begins taking shape:

“Over time something was coming to me,” he says. Propulsive rhythms and hardscrabble stories and scraps of ocher-toned melodies began to spin ‘round inside. “I kept thinking ‘red cat’ . . . and I kept hearing an old Charlie Poole song – a cadence.” It began to slide together. “He’s a red cat – not just red colored – but he’s a union man. He becomes Red.” Next, a piece of lyric. ‘I’m a red cat til I die. . .’ ” Soon enough, the itinerant Buddy had a back-story; some fellow travelers he meets along the road – Lefty the Mouse, the Reverend Tom Toad – a past and a future; a story to tell.

The following passage places My Name is Buddy into the context of Cooder’s earlier musical career and notes its connection to his early records, which attempted to recover the tradition of American roots music:

“‘My Name Is Buddy’: Another Record by Ry Cooder” is, in a certain respect, Ry Cooder circling back, revisiting a body of music that has for much of his life held a certain fascination. “When I first started doing records. I thought, ‘I like these old songs. These dustbowl songs.’ So I made a couple of records and people thought: ‘What’s this?’ You can’t sell this.’ But I kept making these things, again and again, because I knew a good song,” he says. “I’d say it’s taken me 40 years to get it right.”

Here the author further contextualizes Buddy within American musical and historical tradition and provides a glimpse of Cooder’s musical influences for the songs he wrote:

While the album weaves through a history of American, regional music – blues, folk, bluegrass with flavors of storefront spirituals and lounge jazz folded in, it also takes a turn through America’s philosophical soul – songs of strivers, of union men, church folk and those down-at-the-heel heroes. If the music feels familiar, their melodies recognizable, they should, says Cooder. Many of them have hovered in our collective backspace for decades. “Most of these songs are based on other tunes, some of them hymns.” Shot through as well are nods or allusions to Reverend Gary Davis, Earl Robinson, Harland Howard, Hank Williams, Woody Guthrie, the protest songs of labor organizer and songwriter, Joe Hill.

Ry chose some wonderful collaborators to “tell” this record. I find it a delicious irony that Pete Seeger not only becomes his music collaborator, but becomes one of the musical heroes Cooder enshrined in the lyrics of the songs thanks to his seminal participation in the Weavers and as Woody Guthrie’s musical partner:

To tell it properly, musically, Cooder went to key source folk” – tenders of the True Vine of American hearth music: He traveled to Beacon, N.Y., and sat in with Mike and Pete Seeger for an historic session (“J. Edgar”) in Pete’s living room, featuring the two brothers on twin banjos. He rounded up bluegrass mandolin maestro Roland White and Cheftains leader Paddy Maloney. He called on old friends and frequent musical companions, Jim Keltner, Van Dyke Parks, Flaco Jimenez, Mike Elizondo and his son, Joachim Cooder.

Here Cooder, in his inimitably eccentric way describes the folk process that leads to the creation of that extraordinary musical idiom, American roots music:

“I’ve always been interested in American vernacular music. How people sat in separate towns and wrote songs and played their instruments. I’ve always been interested in how they arrived at the songs, how they got into them, who taught them how to play their guitar, their fiddle. How they learned to hold it. And how it changed, from town to town, every 20 miles or so, like language, And how, before recordings, it all spread throughout America.”

Though, “My Name is Buddy,” feels authentic, like some lost artifact plucked out of time, it is full of urgent resonance. “We’re not doing this,” Cooder stresses, “to be nostalgic.” — especially when so many of the same issues plague and flummox us today – bigotry, poverty, violence, greed, fair-access.

“I loved these songs; I love the melodies and the messages.

…The idea is to craft them into something your own. “Many of these songs had a warning to the ‘working man’ folded in – especially those 19th Century songs in three-quarter time. It was the very reason for singing. Those songs were about topical things. They were vehicles for people who had a point to get across,” says Cooder. “Otherwise, there is no point in doing it.”

I, for one, can’t wait for the record’s release.

I want to specially thank Shorefire for this tremendous piece of writing from which I quoted extensively. It’s so wonderfully original, I didn’t know how to summarize it so I didn’t even try.

British Chief Rabbi Plays ‘Anti-Semitism Card’ Over Church Divestment Proposal

Sunday, February 19th, 2006
caterpillar tractor bears down on palestinianIDF-operated Caterpillar armored tractor bears down on lone Palestinian protester (credit: Stop U.S. Military Aid to Israel)

British Chief Rabbi Jonathan Sacks is in the midst of a major row with Rowan Williams, the Archbishop of Canterbury over the Church of England’s vote to consider divesting its stock in the Caterpillar company. The U.S. heavy equipment manufacturer makes earth moving equipment used extensively by the Israeli army to destroy Palestinian homes. In an attempt to express its opposition to such degrading Israeli policies, the Church has voted to study the issue of divesting the company from its portfolio. One should also note that an IDF-operated Caterpillar tractor killed International Solidarity Movement activist, Rachel Corrie (who lived in nearby Olympia, WA).

I have to say that I’m uncomfortable about proposals for outright boycotts of Israel. But this action is morally and economically different. It singles out a specific U.S. company and sends a message that the world community disapproves of Israeli actions that involve collective punishment such as demolishing Palestinian homes (which are illegal under international law). Besides, such divestment does not directly affect Israel at all. If anything, it only effects the U.S. company.

Frankly, I’m not even sure how much impact such divestment will have overall. But it is a statement and such statements are useful. U.S. companies whose products are primarily used in Israel to produce suffering for Palestinian civilians should come under some form of sanction. Notice I said products which cause suffering to civilians. I have no problem with companies which provide products aiding directly in Israel’s defense from terror attacks (in other words those used in a defensive mode).

Chief Rabbi Jonathan SacksRabbi Jonathan Sacks plays the ‘anti-Semitism’ card? (photo: BBC)

The Guardian describes Sacks’ position:

Dr Sacks called into question the Jewish community’s links with the church. In today’s Jewish Chronicle, he says: “The church has chosen to take a stand on the politics of the Middle East over which it has no influence

The Jewish community in Britain has contributed immensely to national life, yet after 350 years we still feel at risk.

The vote of the synod … was ill-judged even on its own terms. The immediate result will be to reduce the church’s ability to act as a force for peace between Israel and the Palestinians for as long as the decision remains in force … The timing could not have been more inappropriate. [Israel] needs support not vilification.”

The italicized passage is yet another feeble attempt to play the ‘anti-Semitism’ card when someone criticizes Israel. Why should British Jewry feel under threat because a Church divests its stock in a company? Why should the Jews of Britain feel under threat because the Church criticizes Israeli policy toward the Palestinians? Has the Church rejected Israel’s right to exist? Has the Church stated that it’s primary sympathy in the Mideast conflict lies with the Palestinians? Emphatically not. So why do Jews need to feel threatened when they hear Israeli criticized especially in such a relatively mild way?

And if Rabbi Sacks believes that the Church’s action will have no influence over Israel’s actions why is he worried about it at all? Does he really believe that divestment will bring the anti-Semites out of the woodwork and make it open season on British Jews? Will divestment somehow encourage terrorism against British Jews? If he really believes this, then he’s being overly melodramatic.

The Guardian notes that it too was the target of Rabbi Sacks’ ire:

The article also accuses the Guardian of increasing the British Jewish community’s sense of vulnerability after last week’s publication of two lengthy articles by its Jerusalem correspondent Chris McGreal that drew comparisons between Israel’s treatment of Palestinians with the apartheid policy in South Africa. A delegation from the Board of Deputies of British Jews met the editor Alan Rusbridger to express concern that the articles would increase anti-semitic attacks….

Responding to the Chief Rabbi, the Guardian’s editor, Alan Rusbridger, said: “We published two pieces by Chris McGreal, which quoted many Israeli and South African Jews with differing viewpoints about a question which is hardly new. We have also published several commentaries and letters rejecting the comparison. I have not come across anyone who considered this was an illegitimate subject for a newspaper to address.”

To me, this is yet another example of the tremendous defensiveness of some Jews in the face of criticism of Israeli policy toward the Palestinians. Here in the U.S. CAMERA and other such right-wing groups routinely call the New York Times, National Public Radio, and other national media ‘anti-Israel’ for offenses similar to the ones outlined above. The media are not anti-Israel because they report that Israel’s policies are criticized. They are not anti-Israel when they report on the ravages of the Occupation. They are doing their job. Just as the media are not anti-Palestinian when they report on Israeli victims of terror. They’re just doing their job.

We Jews seem to want a pliant press that praises Israel and denounces the Palestinians. We seem to believe that this is the only correct and moral position that any self-respecting media outlet could take. The myopia of this view never ceases to amaze me.

Why Won’t the Good Lord Shut Pat Robertson Up?

Friday, January 6th, 2006

God, I’ve had it with Pat Robertson. Bless his pointy little head and big mouth. Whenever he opens it there’s sure to be dreck spewing out. People for the American Way carry the transcript and video of the “performance:”

Pat Robertson on 700 Club blaming Sharon for his strokePat Robertson spouts bile about Ariel Sharon on 700 Club

…I said last year that Israel was entering into the most dangerous periods of its entire existence as a nation. That is intensifying this year with the loss of Sharon. Sharon was personally a very likable person and I am sad to see him in this condition, but I think we need to look at the Bible and the Book of Joel. The prophet Joel makes it very clear that God has enmity against those who “divide my land.” God considers this land to be His. You read the Bible and He says “this is my land” and for any Prime Minister of Israel who decides he is going to carve it up and give it away, God says “no, this is mine.”

I had a wonderful meeting with Yitzhak Rabin in 1974. He was tragically assassinated, it was a terrible thing that happened but nevertheless he was dead. And now Ariel Sharon who again was a very likable person, a delightful person to be with, I prayed with him personally, but here he’s at the point of death. He was dividing God’s land and I would say woe unto any Prime Minister of Israel who takes a similar course to appease the EU, the United Nations, or the United States of America. God says “this land belongs to me. You’d better leave it alone.”

I almost hate to indulge in theological dispute with Pat Robertson because his entire mindset is so repellent to me. But in this case, since his statements about Sharon were so odious, I cannot allow him to hijack the Jewish prophetic tradition to bolster his despicable arguments. After looking through Joel, I can see several passages that would be especially attractive to the End of Days-Hate the Heathen type of guy Pat is:

I will pour out My spirit upon all flesh, and your sons and daughters shall prophesy; your elders shall dream dreams, your young men shall see visions…And I will perform signs in the heavens and on the earth: Blood, fire, and pillars of smoke. The sun shall turn to darkness, and the moon to blood, prior to the coming of the great and awesome day of the Lord. And it shall come to pass that whoever shall call in the name of the Lord shall be delivered, for on Mount Zion and in Jerusalem there shall be a deliverance…

For behold, in those days and in that time when I return the captivity of Judah and Jerusalem, I will gather all the nations and I will take them down to the Valley of Jehoshaphat, and I will contend with them there concerning My people and My heritage, Israel, which they scattered among the nations, and My land they divided. And upon My people they cast lots, and they gave a boy for a harlot, and a girl they sold for wine, and they drank. And also, what are you to Me, Tyre and Sidon and all the regions of Philistia? Are you paying Me recompense? And if you are recompensing Me, I will swiftly return your recompense upon your head…And the children of Judah and the children of Jerusalem you have sold to the children of the Jevanim, in order to distance them from their border. Behold I arouse them from the place where you sold them, and I will return your recompense upon your head…Announce this among the nations, prepare war, arouse the mighty men; all the men of war shall approach and ascend. Beat your plowshares into swords and your pruning hooks into spears; the weak one shall say, “I am mighty.” Gather and come, all you nations from around, and they shall gather; there the Lord shall break your mighty men. The nations shall be aroused and shall go up to the Valley of Jehoshaphat, for there I will sit to judge all the nations from around.
Book of Joel, chapters 3-4

We can discuss the actual historical context of the events described here, but that doesn’t interest Pat. He’s not interested in understanding the meaning or context of the Biblical text. He’s merely interested in projecting his own twisted theological/political worldview upon it.

The Book of Joel speaks of great tragedies inflicted upon the land of Israel and its people by its enemies. It exhorts the Israelites to return to their God and repent their sins so those who’ve sold their children into slavery will get their due in misery.

The vision of the nations gathering in the valley of Jehosephat (literally “God judges”) is a classic text in the Christian messianic tradition. Further, the passage I italicized might be read by Robertson as alluding to the Arabs (and certainly the Palestinians) who caused suffering to Israel in the course of numerous wars against the Jewish state; which would of course further his bigoted anti-Muslim agenda. And Pat certainly loves the martial imagery of the Israelites beating their plowshares into spears. He must really love it when he sees the IDF attack Palestinians. It must fulfill his prophetic vision of Israel at perpetual war with its enemies. But “you know who” will of course come along in Pat’s prophetic dream, judging all the nasties in the valley of Jehosephat and thereby put an end to all that. And then there won’t be any Jews or Muslims. We’ll all be subsumed under the one great all-encompassing (or should I say “overwhelming”) religion, Christianity. Well, excuse me if I say “hold on a minute.”

And of course the passage has nothing to do with the current political situation in Israel-Palestine. While Joel DOES say that the land belongs to God, nowhere does the text say anything remotely like “You better leave it alone.” While Joel DOES say that God will punish those who “divide My land,” He means to punish foreign nations which conquered Israel and NOT an Israeli political leader chosen by his compatriots as Ariel Sharon was. These are Robertson’s falsifications of the text in order to mold it in his own pro-settlement image. Robertson’s fake foray into prophetic channeling bespeaks the dangers of abusing sacred text for one’s own fraudulent purposes. Robertson’s interpretations are absolutely treif (‘unkosher’ or ‘forbidden’). They offend me as a Jew who cares about my own religious traditions and their interpretation by others.

Robertson’s press spokesperson further stuck her foot in it in trying to defend his lunacy:

Robertson spokeswoman Angell Watts said of people who criticized the comments: “What they’re basically saying is, ‘How dare Pat Robertson quote the Bible?’”

“This is what the word of God says,” Watts told the AP. “This is nothing new to the Christian community.”

First, Pat didn’t quote the Bible. He merely paraphrased it and badly at that. Second, he may be faithfully rendering a Christian messianic interpretation of the text. But it is no interpretation that I or the vast majority of Jews would recognize or accept. Third, while his fantastical view of the text may not be new to “the Christian community” (read “evangelicals” as Pat does NOT represent “the Christian community”) it would be new to many of the rest of us (and there are a few in the world who have not yet “seen the light” and “come over” to the Lord).

Be ready for another Pat Robertson “day after” apology along the lines of what he was forced to do after advocating the assassination of Hugo Chavez. Abe Foxman, after denouncing Robertson, will probably make nice and let bygones be bygones. Me, I don’t have to be so nice. Robertson is a spook, a really bad dude. Bad for Jews, bad for Christians, hell, he’s even bad for evangelicals since he makes them look like such loons. Why his fellow preachers don’t ride him out of town on a rail I don’t know.

In short, Ariel Sharon suffered his stroke for many reasons (age, weight, stress level) but not one of them had anything to do with “Dr.” Robertson’s diagnosis. Israeli politics will go on and the peace process (truncated as it has been under Sharon) will continue. Either Ehud Olmert or Amir Peretz will win the upcoming elections and lead Israel that much closer to a lasting peace. Or Bibi Netanyahu will win and take Israel in the other direction. But even if that dreadful outcome occurs, Netanyahu will eventually go the way of the dodo bird and resign as PM. Then the peace process will resume as it has to because the reality of the Middle East doesn’t allow for wild-eyed prophecies of the type spouted by Rev. Pat. Israel and Palestine have both lost enough blood spilled by their sons and daughters. They need no outsiders to egg them on to further futile violence.

“Will no one rid us of this meddlesome priest?” Pat begone. You’ve already done enough damage. Every time you open your mouth you only do more. Can’t someone shut this guy up?

And since we’re quoting prophetic wisdom here, let’s conclude with a latter-day prophet, Bob Dylan, and his Masters of War:

And I hope that you die
And your death’ll come soon
I will follow your casket
In the pale afternoon
And I’ll watch while you’re lowered
Down to your deathbed
And I’ll stand o’er your grave
‘Til I’m sure that you’re dead

Lord help me I know it’s harsh. But I feel we’ve all been long-suffering from the odious spew of this guy long enough. So maybe I don’t wish his death. But what about the Lord sending Pat a bolt of lightning which would shut him up for the rest of his days. Would that be asking too much, Lord?

Performance Optimization WordPress Plugins by W3 EDGE