Mahzor

New York Public Library

Churches

Sarajevo Haggadah

Mah Nishtanah

Sarajevo haggadah

Antaea Darom

Israeli women's art

Action

Torah as music

Ben Heine

Action

ceramic bowl

Mohammad Said Kalash, "Offering Reconciliation" exhibit (photo: Ilan Amihai)

Action

Punch and Judy/Pinchas and Jamila

Avi Katz

Action

David Grossman

Ben Heine

Action

Eldrige Street shul

Lower East Side

Action

Dove

Ben Heine

Action

Two birds

Hoda Jamal

Action

Israeli and Palestinian boys

from documentary, Promises

Action

Cat in the Hat

Yiddish version

Action

Daylight through the Wall

Banksy: graffiti art on Separation Wall

Action

Maurice Sendak's Brundibar set

New Victory Theater (photo: Nan Melville/NYT)

Action

Daniel Barenboim, West-Eastern Divan Orchestra

Palestinian-Israeli musical ensemble (photo: Kerstin Joensson/AP)

Action

Great Day on Eldrige Street

N.Y.'s klezmer greats celebrate shul rededication (photo: Leo Sorel)

Action

Joint Appeal for Peace

(Avi Katz)

Joint Appeal for Peace

Ketubah, Ancona, Italy (1772)

(Jewish Theological Seminary library)

Ancona ketubah

Posts Tagged ‘christian-zionism’

Republican National Committee Endorses Elimination of Palestine from Middle East

Friday, January 20th, 2012

Not only does Newt Gingrich believe there’s no such thing as a Palestinian people, the Republican National Committee does as well.  That mean that 20 years of bipartisan agreement between political parties and the foreign policy of presidents both Republican and Democratic, has been overturned by a resolution passed by the RNC last week.  Mitchell Plitnick reports that a nice, blond-haired white Christian Republican lady from South Carolina has dipped her toe in the deep waters of U.S. Middle East policy and suddenly become expert enough at it to topple long-term consensus.  Here’s what Cindy Costa came up with as the Party’s new approach:

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the members of this body support Israel in their natural and God-given right of self-governance and self-defense upon their own lands, recognizing that Israel is neither an attacking force nor an occupier of the lands of others; and that peace can be afforded the region only through a united Israel governed under one law for all people.

You’ll notice a number of things about this piece of pro-Israel brilliance: Palestine?  Nowhere to be found.  Two states?  Ditto.  Occupation? Ditto.  Mitchell is right in noting that it essentially posits a one-state solution.  The only thing it doesn’t do is decide what to do with the millions of Palestinians living in what used to be known, before the Republicans did away with it, the Occupied Territories.  Do you expel them outright or merely force them to live in an apartheid state?

Now that the Republicans have endorsed the one-state solution, maybe we should all stop pining for the days of two-states and start devising what sort of Israel should exist in the context of this “united Israel.”  Certainly not the one Mrs. Costa imagines, in which there either are no Palestinians or they exist somewhere at the margins of society.  No, all Palestinians must be given full equality, rights and citizenship within this grand unitary state of Israel.  We also must face the prospect that these Palestinian Arabs will likely outnumber Jews within a relatively short period of time.  They might indeed eventually assume political control in a coalition with or even without Jewish support.

The rights of the minority will be protected in that event by a constitution (hopefully), so Jews needn’t worry about their rights being trampled as Jews did to Palestinians when the former were in the majority.  Thus we have to put it to the Netanyahus and RNCs of the world: what type of Israel do you want?  One that eventually will have a Palestinian majority?  Or one that will exist alongside Palestine and possibly have the opportunity to retain a Jewish majority for a much longer period of time (I’m articulating this according to their perspective and values)?

The wording of the full resolution, which can be read at Plitnick’s blog, is a paean to Christian Zionist theology, waxing eloquent about Israel’s God-given right to all the territory granted to Abraham in the Bible.  It even quotes Scripture to seal the deal.  The only thing it doesn’t do is specify how many Jews will be killed before the Rapture in order to ensure the Second Coming of Jesus Christ back to the Holy Land.

Morgenstern Claims Forward Publisher Interceded to Soften Zeek Coverage of Hagee

Wednesday, May 26th, 2010

Ari Morgenstern, John Hagee‘s PR flack for the Jewish community, has now weighed in on the controversy surrounding Zeek’s suspension of coverage of Christian Zionism and Pastor Hagee.  For the background: Rachel Tabachnick contributed regularly to Zeek and that was her beat.  In April, Morgenstern approached editor Jo Ellen Kaiser complaining about Tabachnick’s coverage.  Zeek did extensive fact-checking and found she had not misrepresented anything Hagee had said or written and there were no errors in her reporting.  On the strength of this, Zeek told Morgenstern to take a hike.

Then Morgenstern went higher up the food chain to Sam Norich, the Forward’s editor.  Here is how the former characterizes that interaction:

Christians United for Israel (CUFI) contacted the editors of Zeek to request that they seek comment from our organization if the publication was to run further stories concerning Pastor John Hagee, CUFI, or Christian Zionists.This request is in accordance with the Society of Professional Journalists’ Code of Ethics, specifically the second statement in the first section of the code which states “Journalists should:” “Diligently seek out subjects of news stories to give them the opportunity to respond to allegations of wrongdoing.”

Initially Zeek’s editor did not agree to this request; that decision prompted CUFI to contact the Forward’s publisher due to the two organizations’ co-marketing agreement. Zeek has now agreed to our request, therefore CUFI considers this matter closed.

At no point in time did anyone affiliated with CUFI threaten Zeek or the Forward with legal action.

So according to Morgenstern, if he can be believed, Sam Norich interceded with Jo Ellen Kaiser to allow CUFI to respond to anything Zeek intended to publish about Hagee, CUFI or Christian Zionism.  And Zeek agreed.  Again, if this is true it is extraordinary.  In fact, I’ve never heard of any serious publication agreeing to allow a specific organization to comment whenever it planned to publish anything about that organization, its leader or the general movement of which the organization is a part.

That might explain why Kaiser suspended publication of any articles on this subject because every single one would have a reply appended from Hagee and his henchmen.  It just wouldn’t look good.

Now to Sam Norich’s characterization of his own role in this:

I cannot speak for Zeek…We host that publication on our web site, TheJewishDailyForward.com [ed. actually someone should tell him that the Forward's website is actually Forward.com]. That brings the editorial offerings of each publication to the attention of the other’s online readership, but they have no say about our editorial judgments and we have no say about theirs.

In other words, we have a he said-he said situation here in which Norich claims he had no involvement in any editorial decision Zeek made about this matter.  I’ve written to Norich and asked him if he’d like to clarify or respond to Morgenstern’s claim.  But given that Rachel Tabachnick has been removed from the Chrisitian Zionism beat at Zeek, it would appear that Morgenstern’s version is more credible than Norich’s.

What I cannot understand is why Sam Norich would think it was a good idea for Zeek to go easier in its coverage on John Hagee .  Maybe the reason he wouldn’t talk to me about this was that it would be hard for him to explain it too.

We ought to return to Morgenstern’s comment for a little analysis.  First, his little quotation from the Society of Professional Journalist’s code of ethics is a total non sequitur since Zeek was not accusing Hagee of “wrongdoing” in the sense that the code intended.  It wasn’t accusing him of a criminal act or lawbreaking or even immorality.  It was attacking his views and his statements.  So there is absolutely no reason for Zeek to have agreed to this nor any reason Norich should’ve pressured Zeek to do so.

The fact that Zeek and The Forward did so indicates a callow sense of journalistic standards.  Instead of standing by their newspapers, their product and their authors, they retreated and did the bully’s bidding.  I feel ashamed really of both since they both, at their best, represent good journalism and humane values.

There is one portion of Morgenstern’s statement which is either a lie or a gross misrepresentation of fact.  I know for a fact that after a conversation with Sam Norich, who’d just spoken with Morgenstern, that Kaiser wrote to others that she fully expected Hagee to sue.  I know for a fact that she hired an attorney to represent Zeek in the event of such a suit.  If I have to, I will bring forward the proof that Morgenstern is grossly dissembling.

Jo Ellen Kaiser too has weighed in with a comment on this affair.  She seems to be engaging in a bit of revisionism regarding decisions she made about Zeek’s editorial approach to Christian Zionism and Israel:

Zeek has not ceased coverage of Israeli politics or even of Christian Zionists. I decided to put our coverage of Christian Zionism on hiatus for three months while we determine our editorial direction. I communicated this to all our writers. We will continue to publish articles about Israeli politics in the next three months, and I believe it is likely that we will resume some coverage of Christian Zionist activity in Israel–I just wanted to take a breather to reassess our editorial position. Zeek is a catalyst for conversations about the Jewish tomorrow. Our role is to engage Jews around questions of Jewish identity. How American Jews relate to Israel, and specifically the Israel-Palestine situation, is critical to our understanding of Jewish identity…

I know for a fact that besides Rachel Tabachnick, whose writing has been suspended, other writers who covered Israel changed their status.  One resigned and one was told not to write about Israeli politics.  So if Kaiser does intend to publish on Israel in the next three months either she’s going to find a new writer to do so or she’s changed her mind.

Further, she has specifically said that she intends for the Diaspora to be the central focus of Zeek and that coverage of Israel (and for some reason she sees Hagee as associated with Israel) is “tangential” (her word) to the magazine’s mission.  So once again this seems to be revisionism.  Either she’s changed her mind and Israel is no longer tangential or she’s not being fully honest with herself.

My final word on this affair to Sam Norich and Jo Ellen Kaiser is that if you lie down with dogs you’ll get up with fleas.  Both of them played the game by Hagee’s rules and it makes them look all the smaller for it.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Jewish Forward Helps Hagee Wash Away His Sins

Saturday, May 22nd, 2010
john hagee

Hagee ♥ Jews--or so he claims

Many Jews know John Hagee, founder of Christians United for Israel and leading Christian Zionist zealot, as an anti-Semite who believes Hitler was sent by God to help create the State of Israel.   They may also know he supports an Israeli attack on Iran and that he likens Mahmoud Ahmadinejad to Hitler.  They may also know that he is a pro-settler, not-one-incher, who believes every bit of Biblical Israel was given to the Jewish people by God.  Hagee condemns any peace settlement or Israeli leader who considers withdrawing from a single settlement and labels withdrawal or territorial compromise a betrayal of God’s covenant with Israel.  Perhaps he is most notoriously known for embracing an End Times narrative that calls for Jews who refuse to convert to be killed with the remaining remnant coming to Jesus to be reborn in the blood of the Christian lamb.  Less well-known is his classical anti-Semitic view that the world economic order is controlled by a group like the Illuminati, one of whose primary members are the Rothschild family:

Our economic destiny is controlled by the Federal Reserve system that is now headed by Alan Greenspan. Think about this. It is not a government institution. It is controlled by a group of Class A stockholders including the Rothschilds of Europe…So get this one thought : The value of your dollar is controlled by an organization that is not controlled by America.

Jewish leaders like Rabbi Eric Yoffie have railed against Hagee in the pages of the Jewish Forward, urging their members not to collaborate with or participate in events sponsored by CUFI.

So imagine my surprise when I read John Hagee’s name plastered on The Forward’s website this week.  Astonishingly, the liberal Jewish publication had given the uber-Zionist. anti-Semite a platform for his noxious views.  The piece the Forward published is extraordinary in so many ways.  I have read many speeches and sermons by John Hagee.  While they are always deeply disturbing, the Forward op ed is startingly different because it advances a revisionist version of Hagee as philo-Semite, two-stater, land-for peacer that is entirely at variance with his preceding career.  It’s as if a plastic surgeon took a flabby, balding, flat-footed, nondescript man and turned him into George Clooney (or to be more political accurate, Charlton Heston–when he was alive at least).

In fact, the Forward column is so poles apart from the Hagee that anyone who’s read him knows that I half-believe it wasn’t written by him; but rather by a Jewish ghost-writer (possibly like his PR flack Ari Morgenstern or political lobbyist, David Brog).

In short, the Forward piece is a tissue of lies easily disproved by the most basic Google searches of his previous writings.  For the most detailed and cmprehensive refutation of Hagee’s claims read this primer researched and published by Talk2Action’s Rachel Tabachnick, one of the most authoritative of the former’s Jewish critics.  The main howlers are his claim that he is willing to accept a two-state solution (although he doesn’t endorse this path himself even in this column) if Israel itself does:

Another concern that some individuals have expressed is that Christian Zionists will use our influence to stand in the way of efforts to advance a two-state solution to the Arab-Israeli conflict. Such a claim shows a complete disregard for our record.

What is Hagee’s record?  Just after 30 evangelical leaders wrote a letter to Pres. Bush endorsing a two-state solution, the good Pastor penned his own letter which laid out his negative views of a two-state solution.  It read in part:

Mr. President, we write this letter to state we are opposed to America pressuring Israel to give up more land for any reason.

…Simply stated, land for peace is a policy is a failed policy of the past that has produced nothing but more war.

And further:

There will be grave consequences for the nation or nations that attempt to divide the land of Israel… This is not a time to provoke God and defy him to pour out judgment on our nation for being a principal in the division of the land of Israel.”

–from Hagee’s Jerusalem Countdown: a Warning to the World

In this video, Hagee argues that if the U.S. pressures Israel to give up land for peace that God will judge this country be releasing a terrorist who will wreak havoc on us:

To give up more land for peace, Joel 3:2, says any nation that tries to get Israel to divide my land, I will bring it into judgement,  I want those of you in the State Department and in Washington to hear this..  If America does not stop pressuring Israel to give up land I believe that God will bring this nation into judgment because I believe what this book says.  And if God brings this nation into judgement he will very likely release the terrorist that you’ve already let here  through the ridiculous immigration policy that you refuse to stop and this nation is going to go through a blood bath that you have permitted because of what you have done.”

In fact, Hagee defines for us what he believes Israel’s legitimate modern borders should be, which if implemented, would be a whopper of a land for peace deal in Israel’s favor!

“In modern terms, Israel rightfully owns all of present-day Israel, all of Lebanon, half of Syria, two-thirds of Jordan, all of Iraq, and the northern portion of Saudi Arabia.”

The Battle for Jerusalem

So, if you read Hagee’s Forward screed carefully you will see what he is really saying is I detest a two state solution and land for peace.  But if Israel embraces it, I won’t stand in the way. But even that is undermined by his seeming endorsement of the assassination of Yitzhak Rabin as detailed by Max Blumenthal in The Nation:

…In his 1996 book The Beginning of the End, Hagee described the murder of Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin as fulfillment of prophecy and suggested admiration for Rabin’s assassin, Yigal Amir.

Imagining Amir’s mindset as he prepared himself to kill Rabin, Hagee wrote, “Tonight, if God was good, an opportunity would show itself. No longer would Rabin be able to transfer Israeli lands to Palestinians. The damage he’d done in the West Bank and Gaza was enough. Israel had a divine right to the land, and to give it away was an act of treason against Israel and an abomination against God.”

Does this suggest to you someone who’s prepared to accept an Israeli peace plan that betrays such principles?

Hagee claims, in the Forward, to be uninterested in the conversion of Jews:

The first rule adopted by Christians United for Israel was that there would be no proselytizing at our events. CUFI exists only to honor and support the Jewish people, never to convert them.

Well, get a gander of this:

“There are several purposes [in the Tribulation which accompanies the End Times], and the first is to bring Israel to the place where she will recognize Jesus Christ as the Messiah…

While CUFI itself may not proselytize, Hagee has in fact endorsed a Christian ministry preaching to Jews in Israel:

“Your gift to support the ongoing work of Maoz Israel Ministries enables us to continue on our mission – to bring the Good News of the Gospel of Messiah to the people of Israel until ALL ISRAEL IS SAVED!”

A CUFI director, Stephen Strang, who publishes much of Hagee and CUFI’s materials also brings out a magazine, Charisma, which offered this appraisal of missionary work in Israel :

“In this issue, we offer a look at the Christian peacemakers who are taking the gospel of Jesus Christ not only to Jews and Muslims but also to Russian and Ethiopian immigrants, prisoners, unwed mothers, drug addicts and tourists who visit this unique land. We hope that when you visit Israel you will look beyond the stone monuments, churches and biblical sites to discover the people of faith who are transforming the land.”

Hagee claims to have nothing but respect for the Jewish religion.  Yet, this is what he had to say about Rabbi Hillel, perhaps the most important rabbinic figure of the Talmudic era:

“Hillel was an extremist...

Final Dawn Over Jerusalem

And this concerning those stiff-necked Jews who refused to accept the divinity of Jesus:

“When will the divinely imparted spiritual blindness upon the Jewish people end concerning the identity of Jesus Christ as Messiah?

Jerusalem Countdown

Do feel some pity for the poor godless Reform Jews Hagee excoriates here:

“I think if I could put a dividing line, the Orthodox and Conservatives who have a Torah appreciation give us wholehearted support. The rest who are not driven by the Word of God have a liberal agenda. And the liberal agenda is they are pro-abortion. They’re pro-homosexual. They’re pro-gay marriage — they want men to marry men and women to marry women…

–San Antonio Express, July 2006

And then there is the whigged-out Hagee devising a theory of Jewish demons so convoluted that it would drive even a conspiracy theorist to drink:

“The case of Esau and Jacob is the pinnacle of divine election.  Each was a pure-blooded Jew…Esau’s descendants would also produce a lineage that would attack and slaugher the Jews for centuries…It was Esau’s descendants who produced the half-breed Jews of humanity who have persecuted and murdered Jews beyond human comprehension.

Adolph Hitler was a distant descendant of Esau.”

In the following passage from Hagee’s Forward article, he addresses the End Times scenario of which so many Jews are leery:

Other [Jews suspicious of us] posit that our Zionism is tied to an effort to speed the second coming of Jesus. [This] allegation is flat wrong…

…The fact is that the vast majority of Christian Zionists and Evangelicals do not believe there is anything we can do to hasten the second coming of Jesus. Our theology is clear that we humans are utterly powerless to change God’s timetable. Yes, like many Jews we do believe that the creation of Israel was the fulfillment of biblical prophecy. And like our Jewish friends we also search the Scriptures to understand what may come next in God’s plans for His creation. But since we are powerless to change these plans, our motives for standing with Israel come from elsewhere.

In other words, Hagee’s belief in an apocalyptic future in which Jews are fated to die (curiously any discussion of this theological belief of his is missing from the Forward)  is nothing personal.  Rather it is a divine plan over which Hagee has no control.  So if Jews have any problem with it don’t take it up with Hagee, take it up with the Guy Upstairs.  Further, he would have us believe that he and his followers are quiescent folks who sit back and wait for the Lord’s will to be done.  That they do nothing in order to hasten God’s plan.  And whatever they do do, they do for the purest of motives having nothing to do with End Times theology.

In fact, this view of Hagee and CUFI flies in the face of everything we know about them.  The truth is they are an activist group and the purpose of their activism is to hasten the Second Coming.

Hagee in The Forward is only too happy to play the religious hate card by making Israel’s and America’s chief enemy, Islam:

Christian Zionists also recognize that Israel is not the cause of militant Islam’s hatred of America, but an ally in the fight against militant Islam. Until 9/11 and the ensuing events, Israel largely confronted this threat alone. And to this day the frontline of this conflict remains Israel’s backyard. But Christian Zionists understand that Israel is merely militant Islam’s first target. While American and Israeli soldiers do not fight on the same battlefield, they defend the same values.

In penning this bilge, Hagee is oblivious to the fact that Israel’s chief opponent is not “militant Islam,” but the Palestinian people, who are not motivated primarily by religious hatred, but rather by a political grievance, that is 42 years of Occupation.  Even if you argue falsely that Hamas is no different from Al Qaeda and it is motivated by religious hatred of Israel, how do you explain the equally implacable resistance of Fatah and West Bank Palestinians to Occupation?  Such nuance is lost on Hagee.

Finally, the idea that American and Israeli soldiers defend the same values is ludicrous, unless you want to argue somehow that U.S. occupations of Iraq and Afghanistan are parallel to Israel’s Occupation of Palestinian lands.  This, of course is Al Qaeda’s argument and it wouldn’t surprise me at all to find the latter in agreement with John Hagee, as they are both religious extremists.

Finally, I take strong exception to The Forward’s decision to publish this execrable nonsense. The paper’s op-ed editor, the right-leaning Daniel Treiman commissioned this piece and he should have his license to practice journalism suspended. Did he do any fact-checking before publishing this? Or did he feel his author was of such impeccable reputation that such rudimentary editorial review was unnecessary?

Furthermore, the Forward deleted comments posted by Rachel Tabachnick and Bruce Wilson of Talk2Action, Jewish opponents of Hagee, in the thread for this article. Their contributions offered Hagee quotations like the ones above to rebut the claims he made. I’m assuming that Treiman as op-ed editor made the decision to excise these perfectly reasonable comments. Did he or did someone higher in the food chain? If so, why?

Until recently, Rachel Tabachnick contributed articles twice a month to Zeek, a progressive Jewish publication which shares a website with The Forward, about Hagee and Christian Zionism. Her work on this subject has been suspended by Zeek’s editor, Jo Ellen Kaiser. No one can now write for Zeek about either matter.

This is the first in a series of posts I’ll be writing about Hagee’s relationship with The Forward and Zeek, threats levelled against them by Hagee, and questions raised about the suspension of Tabachnick’s work. Stay tuned…

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Gary Bauer Launches Keep Israel Safe, Attacks Obama for ‘Coddling’ Iran

Saturday, May 1st, 2010


With Mahmoud Ahmadinejad scheduled to speak at the UN in the coming days, the pro-Israel warlocks are out in force. The Israel lobby yesterday took out a full page N.Y. Times ad saying that ending U.S. use of foreign oil would stop Iran from getting the bomb. Not to be outdone, the Republican evangelical-right beast is stirring in its lair as well. Gary Bauer, under the tutelage of, or at least in homage to Lynne Cheney’s Keep America Safe, has launched Keep Israel Safe with what the Weekly Standard wildly errs in calling a “hard-hitting” video claiming that Barack Obama misguidedly snubs Israel’s prime minister while coddling the lunatics in Teheran. The campaign seems to also have direct or implict support from Bill Kristol and his Weekly Standard, which was the first media outlet to announce the group’s existence.

It’s really edifying propaganda material. Definitely deserves a place in the annals of hasbara as one of the more lurid, ridiculous loads of dreck. Perhaps Frank Luntz can include it in his next edition of the Hasbara Handbook:

Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, Iran’s President.

He vows to destroy Israel. Quote: “Wipe Israel from the pages of Israel.” “Wipe them off the map.”

Time is running out. Soon, the world’s most dangerous regime will have the world’s most dangerous weapon: the atomic bomb.

So how does out president respond to the threat against our ally, Israel? By condemning Israel for building homes in Jerusalem, its capital. By snubbing Israel’s prime minister when he came to Washington. By coddling the Iranian regime…

If you were Israel would you feel safe in Barack Obama’s hands? Tell the White House that keeping Israel safe helps keep America safe.

H/t Joel Katz, Religion and State in Israel.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Elie Wiesel, Moral Mercenary

Tuesday, February 9th, 2010

Wiesel, Hagee and Israeli minister Uzi Landau (within whose retinue several Mossad agents are reputed to have entered Dubai to assassinate a Hamas operative)

Did you know morality is for sale?  No?  Well, as far as Elie Wiesel is concerned it is.  If the Palestinians had $500,000 THEY might find moral favor in Elie’s eyes as well.  You see, since Bernie Madoff blew Wiesel’s foundation assets, I guess he’s found a need to sell his scruples to the highest bidder.  Last year that would’ve been John Hagee, before whose Christians United for Israel conference Wiesel pronounced the anti-Semite and homophobe his “dear pastor” (see video):

For delivering one speech to Hagee’s congregation, Wiesel received a check for $500,000 toward his foundation, according to Marita Styrsky, the wife of Christians United for Israel Eastern Regional Director Victor Styrsky (Christians United is Hagee’s lobbying arm).

To be fair, CUFI wouldn’t call this an honorarium or speaker’s fee.  For them it was a donation for a good cause.  But you and I both know that were it not for the cool half-mill, Elie would’ve told Hagee to take a powder.

It makes you wonder what and who might be paying (if anyone is) for Wiesel’s activism against Iran?  Or is that based on “pure” moral principles as opposed to mercenary moral principles?  Perhaps Ahmadinejad ought to invite Wiesel to give a lecture in Teheran for a mill.  Maybe Wiesel would change his point of view.

And the next time you hear of some good deed performed by the Elie Wiesel Foundation remember it’s probably funded by a man who said that Hitler was half-Jewish and doing the work of the Lord, John Hagee.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Walid Shoebat: Ex-PLO Terrorist, Muslim Apostate, Evangelical Convert, Arab Zionist…and Now, Charlatan

Thursday, April 10th, 2008

Thanks to Jerry Haber for bringing this article to my attention. Whenever I read such a story it brings to mind Robert Duvall’s gung ho U.S. cavalry officer in Apocalypse Now: “Oh how I love the smell of napalm in the morning.” Except in this case, the “napalm” is the smell of Walid Shoebat’s lies going up in smoke.

Shoebat is the darling of the neo-con, Israel First, Christian Zionist set who has claimed for years that he was a “PLO terrorist,” who converted from Islam to evangelical Christianity, and travels the world singing the praise of Israel’s maximalist claims to Judea and Samaria. He also denounces the Palestinians as terror-mad and Islam as a religion of violence and vengeance. He speaks to campus Hillels and any Jewish audience that will have him.

Now, the Jerusalem Post (yes, really the Jpost!) has blown the lid off Walid Shoebat or whoever he is:

Shoebat’s Web site says his is an assumed name, used to protect him from reprisal attacks by his former terror chiefs, whom he says have put a $10 million price on his head.

Shoebat is sometimes paid for his appearances, and he also solicits donations to a Walid Shoebat Foundation to help fund this work and to “fight for the Jewish people.”

The BBC, Fox News and CNN have all presented Shoebat as a terrorist turned peacemaker, interviewing him as someone uniquely capable of providing insight into the terrorist mindset.

Now he and two other former extremists are set to appear along with US Senator Joe Lieberman, Ambassador to the US Sallai Meridor and other notables at an annual “Christians United For Israel” conference in Washington in July.

The three “ex-terrorists” have appeared…most recently, at the US Air Force Academy in Colorado, in February, at a conference whose findings, the organizers said, would be circulated at the Pentagon and among members of Congress and other influential figures.

Last year, Shoebat spoke to the BattleCry Christian gathering in San Francisco, which drew a reported 22,000 evangelical teenagers to what the San Francisco Chronicle described as “a mix of pep rally, rock concert and church service.”

The paper described Shoebat as a self-proclaimed “former Islamic terrorist” who said that Islam was a “satanic cult” and who told the crowd how he eventually accepted Jesus into his heart.

However, Shoebat’s claim to have bombed Bank Leumi in Bethlehem is rejected by members of his family who still live in the area, and Bank Leumi says it has no record of such an attack ever taking place.

His relatives, members of the Shoebat family, are mystified by the notion of “Walid Shoebat” being an assumed name. And the Walid Shoebat Foundation’s working process is less than transparent, with Shoebat’s claim that it is registered as a charity in the state of Pennsylvania being denied by the Pennsylvania State Attorney’s Office.

Shoebat’s claim to have been a terrorist rests on his account of the purported bombing of Bank Leumi. But after checking its files, the bank said it had no record of an attack on its Bethlehem branch anywhere in the relevant 1977-79 period.

Shoebat told The Jerusalem Post that this could be because the bank building was robustly protected with steel and that the attack may have caused little damage.

Asked whether word of the bombing made the news at the time, he said, “I don’t know. I didn’t read the papers because I was in hiding for the next three days.” (In 2004, he had told Britain’s Sunday Telegraph: “I was terribly relieved when I heard on the news later that evening that no one had been hurt or killed by my bomb.”)

Shoebat could not immediately recall the year, or even the time of year, of the purported bombing when talking to the Post by phone from the US. After wavering, he finally settled for the summer of 1977.

The Sunday Telegraph described Shoebat as a man who “for much of his life… was eager to commit acts of terrorism for the sake of his soul and the Palestinian cause.”

In that interview he described how he and his peers were indoctrinated as children “to believe that the fires of hell were an ever-present reality. We were all terrified of burning in hell when we died… The teachers told us that the only way we could certainly avoid that fate was to die in a martyrdom operation – to die for Islam.”

But an uncle and a cousin of Shoebat, who still live in Beit Sahur in the Bethlehem area, where Shoebat grew up, said that Shoebat’s education was rather mild ideologically, and that religion did not play a dominant role.

The uncle, interviewed at his home, said he remembered little about his nephew, because Walid left for America at the age of 16, and because his American mother always kept a distance from the rest of the family. The uncle and his wife both said firmly that there was no attack on Bank Leumi.

When questioned on this discrepancy, Shoebat was adamant that he did carry out such a bombing, and that his relatives deny it to cover up for another cousin who was with him during the attack and still lives in Bethlehem.

Shoebat evinced no particular surprise that his family could be tracked down simply by asking Beit Sahur locals where they lived, even though his Internet site claims that his is an assumed name.

What’s especially ironic about this is that most con men conceal their identity and change their name to hide their tracks. In this case, Shoebat claimed his name was fake when it was genuine, a total reversal of the pattern. But almost everything else about him appears to be made up.

Yet another right-wing pro-Israel fantasist seeking grandeur on behalf of his cause. What is sad about this is that pro-Israel nationalists are so eager to find friends wherever they can that they don’t bother to test the credibility or moral code of those with whom they jump into bed. John Hagee is but another example of this problem though one can’t accuse him of fictionalizing his background.

I should add to the passage about their appearance at the Air Force Academy. Their talk was billed as being about Islamic terror when in reality they were there to advance their mission of evangelizing to the unconverted. The Academy has been in tremendous hot water over the past year or so for having chaplains who nakedly promoting conversion of non-evangelical cadets against the institution’s regulations. Several Congressional members have been livid about this. So it seems that in this appearance both Shoebat AND his Air Force hosts were concealing their ulterior motives in bringing them there.

This begs another question: can Joe Lieberman continue with plans to appear with these three fraudsters? If he does, will anyone call him and them on the charade they’ll be perpetrating on the Jewish community?

Here’s more on their ongoing fraud:

A New York Times report last month on the Air Force Academy event, headlined “Speakers at Academy Said to Make False Claims,” noted that “Academic professors and others who have heard the three men speak in the United States and Canada said some of their stories border on the fantastic, like Mr. Saleem’s account of how, as a child, he infiltrated Israel to plant bombs via a network of tunnels underneath the Golan Heights. No such incidents have been reported, the academic experts said. They also question how three middle-aged men who claim they were recruited as teenagers or younger could have been steeped in the violent religious ideology that only became prevalent in the late 1980s.”

The Times quoted Prof. Douglas Howard, who teaches the history of the modern Middle East at Calvin College in Grand Rapids, Michigan, as saying after he heard Saleem speak last November at the college that he thought the three were connected to several major Christian evangelical organizations.

“It was just an old time gospel hour: ‘Jesus can change your life, he changed mine,’” Howard said.

The professor told the Times that his doubts about the authenticity of the three grew after he heard stories like that of the Golan Heights tunnels, “as well as something on Mr. Saleem’s Web site along the lines that he was descended from the grand wazir of Islam. The grand wazir of Islam is a nonsensical term.”

The newspaper said Arab-American civil rights organizations have questioned “why, at a time when the United States government has vigorously moved to jail or at least deport anyone with a known terrorist connection, the three men, if they are telling the truth, are allowed to circulate freely.”

And there’s more about Shoebat’s financial fraud:

Visitors to Shoebat’s Internet site are encouraged to make a donation to his foundation to enable him to disseminate his message. However, a notice on the page states that for “security reasons,” the money will not be debited to his foundation, but rather to a company called Top Executive Media. The name Top Executive Media is used by a greetings card firm from Pennsylvania called Top Executive Greetings, a company with an annual turnover of $500,000. When one makes a donation through the Shoebat Internet site, the Web address changes to topexecutivegreetings.com/shoebat.

This seems to be the only active page for the company; its homepage is blank.

Asked by the Post whether the Walid Shoebat Foundation is a registered charity, Shoebat replied that it is registered in Pennsylvania.

The Pennsylvania State Attorney’s office said it had no record of a charity registered under this name.

Questioned further, Shoebat said it was registered under a different name, but that he was not aware of the details, which are handled by his manager.

“I remain separate to the running of the charity so that I am not constrained by church rules,” he explained, adding that the organization’s connection to certain churches meant it would be difficult for him to speak to secular audiences if he became too involved in running it.

Dr. Joel Fishman, of the Allegheny County Law Library in Pennsylvania, expressed doubts about this donation process. If the money were being given to a registered charity, the charity would have to make annual reports to the state and federal government on how it was being spent, he noted.

Shoebat insisted donations were not being misused, however. “I survive by being an author,” he said. “I only get paid for being an author. All the money that is donated gets put back into events.”

If the Bank Leumi bombing claim is unfounded, it is unclear why Shoebat would have wanted to manufacture a terrorist past. True or not, however, it has plainly brought him some prominence and provided him with a means to speak in favor of Israel and be paid for doing so.

In that final paragraph, the reporter makes clear why the reluctant Muslim would have wanted to manufacture a terrorist past: it has brought him a following and financial rewards. And all built on a pro-Israel house of cards.

Shoebat’s manager mentioned above is Keith Davies, who has commented angrily here about my previous “outing” of Shoebat. The question yet to be answered is who is behind Top Executive Media. It seems clear that it is either Christian evangelicals like Hagee or possibly pro-Israel extremists like an Irving Moskowitz. I am sure they’re tried to cover their tracks pretty well. But I hope a good investigative journalist can follow up on this and uncover more.

I have written regularly about Shoebat and other so-called “Good Arab” friends of Israel like Tawfiq Hamid and Amir Taheri and accused them of being at the least intellectual frauds if not real, genuine frauds. But I never had specific evidence until now of the genuine nature of Shoebat’s fraud. The ardent pro-Israel set should’ve realized that if these guys seem too good to be true, it’s because they are. If I smelled a rat why didn’t they?

Hagee: Lies and the Lying Liar Who Tells Them

Monday, April 7th, 2008

Hagee said [he is not] trying to dictate Israel’s security and political policies. Hagee will support Israel whether or not it carries out withdrawals, he repeatedly said, adding that this is something its citizens will decide…

What Hagee essentially says about himself…is, yes, I am a skeptic as to the wisdom behind withdrawals. But I never acted against them, nor shall I…

…Hagee said Israel is a free country. “…Israelis and Israelis alone have the right to make existential decisions about land and peace.” The only lobbying he did on that issue was to try and persuade the U.S. government not to pressure Israel into adopting policies it was reluctant to carry out.

Shmuel Rosner in Haaretz

American evangelist John Hagee on Sunday…declared that Israel must
remain in control of all of Jerusalem…”Turning part or all of Jerusalem over to the Palestinians would be tantamount to turning it over to the Taliban,” Hagee said.

Associated Press

John hageeApocalypse ain’t over till the fat man sings (Jeff Minton)

In the spirit of Al Franken’s Lies and the Lying Liars Who Tell Them, I’d like to dedicate this post to John Hagee, one of the most two-faced Christian preachers out there (and there are quite a few I’m sorry to say). All I can say is: “White man speak with forked tongue.” Believe Hagee at your peril. And as I’ve written before if you lie down with a lying low-down dog you’ll get up with fleas.

Hagee is carrying water for the Likud, make no mistake about that. So if you ever hear anyone trying to sell you the idea that all Hagee cares about is what’s good for Israel–ask that person: “Which Israel?” Bibi’s Israel or the Israel inhabited by the majority of its citizens, who are not right-wing zealots?

Apparently, Hagee takes American Jews for fools. He thinks he can say one thing and then say the exact opposite and we’ll just roll over to get our tummies scratched. All I can say is: butt out buster. Israel doesn’t need your help in determining what its interests are.

John McCain too has drunk the cool-aid. Witness this interview with the Jewish Journal’s Rob Eshman (thanks to Gershom Gorenberg for providing the link):

McCain also defended his support of the controversial Rev. John Hagee…I asked the senator how he would get pro-Israel evangelicals, who have been staunchly opposed to Israel giving up territory or compromising on the status of Jerusalem, to support any peace agreement.

“You can’t jump ahead here,” he said. “I know they favor a peace process. I know they favor that because of my close relations with them, and pastor John Hagee … is one of the leaders of the pro-Israel-evangelical movement in America.”

I started to correct him — Hagee and other evangelicals most certainly don’t support compromise on territory or Jerusalem, and McCain must know this. That’s when I got my first taste of the famous McCain technique: I’ll-talk-so-you-can’t.

“Look,” he cut me off, “I just have to tell you that we should be so grateful for the support of the evangelical movement for the state of Israel, given the influence that they have, beneficial influence that they have over millions of Americans, and then we’ll worry about a peace process later on, but I know that they are committed to peace between Palestinians and Israelis as well.”

Sure John, we trust you just like we trust Hagee. Hagee will support a peace process simply because you know he will. Good enough for me.

According to today’s NY Times, both Hagee and McCain are soft-pedaling the former’s endorsement. It seems there’s been a firestorm of controversy regarding Hagee’s more daft religious views. But I find this statement from the McCain campaign to be incredible:

A McCain adviser acknowledged on Monday that the campaign had failed to look into Mr. Hagee’s background adequately…

Say what? You’re running a presidential campaign and you don’t realize that Hagee is one of the most controversial religious figures in the United States before you accept his endorsement? Not to mention, if you’re going to roast your opponent for his minister’s endorsement (Rev. Wright) you’d better be prepared for your own religious endorsers to come under scrutiny.

Getting back to Hagee, he is an utter ignoramus when it comes to understanding the difference between the Taliban and the Palestinians. In normal everyday life you don’t usually pay a price for being an ignoramus. But in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict there are no such luxuries. It is the ignoramuses who propel the conflict to ever-greater heights of hate and bloodshed.

Christian Evangelical Leaders Call for Two-State Solution

Sunday, December 30th, 2007

Well, glory be. Finally, Christian evangelical leaders who step forward with a pragmatic and realistic approach to resolving the Israeli-Palestinian conflict instead of the usual drivel from the John Hagees and Pat Robertsons of the evangelical world supporting a maximalist Israeli nationalist perspective. Thanks to Daoud Kuttab for pointing me to a terrific statement published last month in Christianity Today by 80 evangelical leaders. It reads in part:

In the context of our ongoing support for the security of Israel, we believe that unless the situation between Israel and Palestine improves quickly, the consequences will be devastating. Palestinians—especially the youth who have no economic opportunity—are increasingly sympathetic to radical solutions and terrorism. As a result, the threat to Israel’s security is now greater.

Likewise, the threat to America’s national security is greater. Because so many of the world’s 1.3 billion Muslims see America through the prism of Israel-Palestine, the longer the current situation continues, the more likely it is that anti-American attitudes, policies, and terrorist activities will increase dramatically among Muslims worldwide.

…The Bible clearly teaches that God longs for justice and peace for all people. We believe that the principles about justice taught so powerfully by the Hebrew prophets apply to all nations, including the United States, Israel, and the Palestinians. Therefore we are compelled to work for a fair, negotiated solution for both Israelis and Palestinians. We resolve to work diligently for a secure, enduring peace and a flourishing economy for the democratic State of Israel. We also resolve to work for a viable permanent, democratic Palestinian State with a flourishing economy that offers economic opportunity to all its people. We believe that the way forward is for the Israelis and Palestinians to negotiate a fair, two-state solution.

…We call on all evangelicals, all Christians, and everyone of good will to join us to work and pray faithfully in the coming months for a just, lasting two-state solution in the Holy Land. We call on all involved governments to work diligently toward this goal. And we covenant to pray for the leaders of all the nations engaged in this effort, hoping for them the blessing of our Lord, who said, “Blessed are the peacemakers.”

…We are empowered by the knowledge that until He comes again, He summons us to support the things that promote peace and justice for everyone in the Holy Land.

Given the high profile enjoyed by the Christian Zionist zealots thanks to their embrace by AIPAC, it is easy to forget that there are evangelicals who are clear-eyed in their analysis of the issues. We need to make common cause with them and to continually ask AIPAC why it chooses the lunatic fringe instead of leaders like the ones featured here.

Performance Optimization WordPress Plugins by W3 EDGE