Mahzor

New York Public Library

Churches

Sarajevo Haggadah

Mah Nishtanah

Sarajevo haggadah

Antaea Darom

Israeli women's art

Action

Torah as music

Ben Heine

Action

ceramic bowl

Mohammad Said Kalash, "Offering Reconciliation" exhibit (photo: Ilan Amihai)

Action

Punch and Judy/Pinchas and Jamila

Avi Katz

Action

David Grossman

Ben Heine

Action

Eldrige Street shul

Lower East Side

Action

Dove

Ben Heine

Action

Two birds

Hoda Jamal

Action

Israeli and Palestinian boys

from documentary, Promises

Action

Cat in the Hat

Yiddish version

Action

Daylight through the Wall

Banksy: graffiti art on Separation Wall

Action

Maurice Sendak's Brundibar set

New Victory Theater (photo: Nan Melville/NYT)

Action

Daniel Barenboim, West-Eastern Divan Orchestra

Palestinian-Israeli musical ensemble (photo: Kerstin Joensson/AP)

Action

Great Day on Eldrige Street

N.Y.'s klezmer greats celebrate shul rededication (photo: Leo Sorel)

Action

Joint Appeal for Peace

(Avi Katz)

Joint Appeal for Peace

Ketubah, Ancona, Italy (1772)

(Jewish Theological Seminary library)

Ancona ketubah

Posts Tagged ‘chabad’

Mumbai Terror Attack Targets Foreigners and Israelis

Thursday, November 27th, 2008
Taj Mahal Hotel in flames

Taj Mahal Hotel in flames (Gautam Singh/AP)

After following terror incidents within India for the past few years, it seemed like the horrible series of terror attacks that occured in Mumbai over the past 24 hours contained something new and alarming.  Previous acts of Muslim terror have targeted purely Indian targets like the Parliament and Mumbai’s financial district.

Yesterday’s terror specifically targeted tourist destinations and a Jewish institution.  The terrorists specifically sought out British and U.S. passport holders.  They also attacked Nariman House,  the Chabad headquarters in the city and killed three people there while taking several hostages.  This is an escalation of tactics.

Indian commando storms Nariman House (Phil Smith/Reuters)

Indian commando storms Nariman House (Phil Smith/Reuters)

My first thought was that targeting specifically Jewish and western targets might indicate Al Qaeda’s involvement.  I also wondered whether the attack might have been sponsored by radical Pakistani Muslims.  However, the N.Y. Times speculates that this is not an Al Qaeda attack, but possibly a revenge attack by Indian Muslims who harbor simmering resentments on a number of fronts.  But even if it is an act of domestic terror, I find it disturbing that it was directed at foreigners and especially Jews.

This means, as one of the experts interviewed for this article notes, that India’s Muslims are absorbing some of the worst of the Islamist rhetoric and adopting it for their own.  And yet again, we see that Muslims with a particular set of domestic grievances are using the rhetoric and strategies of Al Qaeda in their fight.  The provocations they are handed in terms of U.S. occupations of Iraq and Afghanistan and the intractable Israeli-Arab conflict only make things worse.

UPDATE: I just read a report from a Mumbai journalist reminding readers that 95 of the 100 known dead are Indian and not foreign.  So I may have to amend what I said above.

UPDATE I: The Chabad rabbi, his wife and child were reportedly rescued unhurt. I read another story last night that said that neighbors of the Chabad facility stoned the terrorists outside the building and caused them to shower the crowd with automatic weapon fire, killing three. I don’t know whether the crowd’s motivation was specifically to protect the Chabadniks or merely to harry the terrorists. At any rate, if this story is true these neighbors sound like heroes.

UPDATE II: This JTA report says that the Chabad rabbi and wife are still hostages and that they may be either unconscious or dead. There are reports of six hostages who may be Israeli still held by up to four terrorists. The Indian army is currently mounting a rescue operation against Nariman House, where Chabad is housed.

UPDATE III: From this eyewitness report in the N.Y. Times of the military assault on Nariman House it appears that shooting lasted for about 90 minutes.  There has been no shooting for the past 30 minutes.  If there are only four terrorists inside, it would seem strange that it would take 90 minutes to subdue them.  One has to fear for the fate of the hostages inside.

Another interesting facet of the N.Y. Times coverage is that it is much more blog-like than anything I’ve ever seen them do.  They called early for Indian bloggers to provide them with reports from the field.  They publish minute by minute updates of the action.  Little by little, the Times is entering the digital age–and it’s about time.

I noticed the first nascent emergence of this phenomenon during the Lebanon war.  Then it wasn’t so much the newspapers that were live blogging the war.  It was the Lebanese, and to an extent the Israeli bloggers who were doing so.  This was a model for providing more intensive, minute-by-minute coverage that was not mediated by journalists, camera crews and news feeds.  It is a model for the future.

UPDATE IV: Thanks to reader John Dickerson for this Haaretz report which I relate with the caveat that Israeli reports on breaking news stories are known to be notoriously unreliable:

According to information transmitted to the Israeli authorities, there were at least four bodies inside Nariman House, but it was not known whether they were of Israelis. Indian media reported that about 10 of the hostages being held at the Chabad house were freed by security services, but their identities were not known.

This might indicate that Rabbi Holtzberg and his wife are among the dead.  We hope and pray for the safety of all the hostages.

Lev Leviev, Philanthropist

Wednesday, January 16th, 2008

Lev Leviev talks a good game when it comes to his philanthropic largess.  Of course, there is a traditional Jewish obligation to give tzedakah.  And as an ardent supporter of Chabad, Leviev would certainly make an effort to observe such a mitzvah.  He himself confirms this:

 ”I am a believer; I believe in G-d. I believe that we, as people, have to do good acts.”

But how well does he observe it?  The NY Times Magazine’s profile of him throws out the figure $50-million per year.  Most people would sound oohs and aahs to hear such a large number.  But if you calculate Leviev’s net worth at $8-billion, which is the number mentioned in the NYT article, then $50-million is roughly 0.625% of his overall worth.  That’s less than 1%!  Most Americans give roughly 3.5% of their annual income to charity each year.  Of course, it’s hard to know Leviev’s annual income and it’s surely less than $8-billion.  But still $50-million is much less impressive when seen in this context.

It also appears that Leviev is passing off fraudulent claims about his charitable giving to reporters who write about him.  He claimed in this Lifestyles Magazine profile, that he donated to Oxfam America:

Leviev’s philanthropic activities have also touched U.S. cultural institutions, such as the Museum of the City of New York, and U.S. charities, such as the annual Angel Ball (which raises money for cancer research; the Carousel of Hop Ball (one of the most prominent and influential charitable events of its kind), and Oxfam America.

Problem is, Oxfam can’t seem to find any evidence to support the claim.  In fact, it’s against Oxfam’s guidelines to accept gifts from anyone whose business dealings violate international law, as Leviev’s building of settlements would.  If this aspect of Leviev’s PR puffery is fake imagine how much else might be?

There is even more questionable material in the Lifestyles story:

Leviev prefers to keep a low profile even as he is so active, attending global roundtables, like the World Economic Forum last year in Davos. He grants few interviews and though he circulates among world leaders like Russian president Vladimir Putin – whom he calls a “true friend”- he stays close to his home in Israel, where he lives in a modest house with his wife, Olga, and nearby their nine children and several grandchildren.

Apparently, Leviev has contradicted the author by agreeing to the NYT profile and this interview.  In addition, Leviev has just moved his headquarters to London and moved into a $70 million home.  Not such a low profile after all.

Leviev likes to compare himself favorably to Bill Gates in terms of his charitable giving.  There was a time when Gates was younger that his charitable giving was much less impressive than it is now.  But Lev Leviev has a long way to go before he’s in Bill Gates’ league.  In fact, given the depth and breadth of the Gates Foundation philanthropic program it’s safe to say that Lev Leviev will never make anywhere near the impact.  Not to mention that Leviev’s giving is narrowly focused on supporting right-wing Jewish causes like Chabad and the Israeli settler movement.

Leviev’s $70 Million Digs: Most Expensive New Mansion Ever in Britain

Thursday, January 10th, 2008
leviev $70 million london homeLeviev’s $70-million new Hampstead home (Reuters)

No doubt about it. Lev Leviev wants to make a big splash in his new pond, London.

What does $70 million buy you in the way of a London house? If you’re a pal of Russian mobsters and the 210th richest man in the world, it buys you a 17,000 sqaure foot home and $100,000 bulletproof door, for one. And that’s not all:

The seven-bedroom house in the exclusive north London district of Hampstead boasts a $1.5 million stone staircase constructed using 150-year-old carving techniques and an indoor swimming pool with gold-plated mosaic tiles.

The Palladian-style home also features a gym, sauna, ballroom and cinema, a private hair salon and a one-tone bathroom basin carved from a single piece of white Iranian onyx…

Once installed in his new home, Leviev will be protected not only by the bullet-proof front door but by 25 security cameras and a high-tech alarm system that can be controlled remotely – from a yacht in the Caribbean if necessary.

In his front garden is a topiary bush that cost $40,000 to shape, and should he get cold there is a $200,000 hand-carved stone fireplace in the living room.

Lev leviev’s indoor poolLeviev’s gold-plated indoor pool–fit for an Israeli emperor

This will be the new home of Lev Leviev, a former Uzbek immigrant to Israel who learned the diamond trade from the ground up and eventually figured out, with the help of the repressive Angolan government, how to break the DeBeer’s monopoly. Ze’ev Chafets says in a NY Times profile that Leviev is worth as much as $8-billion. Leviev has just announced that he’s moving his business operations from Israel to London. His new digs have to be the most expensive coming out party anyone’s ever conceived.

It appears he’s leaving Israel because it taxes its citizens’ income wherever it is earned while Britain does not tax a foreigner’s income earned outside the country. Several other Israeli tycoons have moved for the same reason and into the same London neighborhood reports the Jerusalem Post:

His new neighborhood in Hampstead is home to a number of wealthy Israelis like himself, who were drawn to live there due to British law, which does not require foreigners to pay taxes on income earned abroad. Among them are Zvi Meitar, the founder of one of Israel’s biggest law firms; Benny Steinmitz, a diamond dealer and property tycoon; Yigal Zilka, head of Queenco Leisure International; and the real estate developer, Sammy Shimon.

Like his friend and former Russian mobster, Roman Abramovich (he’s too rich and powerful now to be a mere mobster), who owns the Chelsea football club, Leviev owns an Israeli football club. But this isn’t what’s most interesting about Leviev.

Leviev is an ardent supporter of the settler enterprise. Not just an ideological supporter, but a financial backer and major investor in West Bank settlements. We’re not talking about illegal outposts and a few shipping containers on a hilltop here. We’re talking about full-blown towns worth hundreds of millions of dollars as real estate investment opportunities. And Leviev is a key financial backer of the Land Redemption Fund, a front for settler land purchases which uses Arab buyers to convince reluctant Palestinians to sell their farmland. He and Abramovich were honorees at an Elad fundraiser two years ago. Its purpose is to Judaize East Jerusalem.

You’ll also recall that the diamond czar just opened a glittering new emporium on Madison Avenue and invited lots of New York celebrities to the opening. Ruth Westheimer, Susan Sarandon and Isabella Rosselini are among those who crossed an Adalah picket line to view the baubles. Jewish Voice for Peace and Palestinian villagers whose land was expropriated for a Leviev settlement project wrote to Sarandon asking her to repudiate Leviev, but she refused. I’m sorry but I’ll never view a Susan Sarandon movie the same now that she’s been morally tone deaf in this situation.

When Leviev came to Israel as a teenager he enrolled in a yeshiva but found it wasn’t for him. But he’s embraced Chabad with gusto and is the single largest funder of its Russian operation, which controls the state sponsored Jewish communal organization.

And can someone tell me why he needs a bulletproof door? Is he afraid that a poor Palestinian farmer is going ride his donkey all the way from Bilin to London to spray his home with bullets? Or is he afraid one of Roman Abramovich’s enemies might try to pop him? Isn’t it a pity that that farmer from Bilin can’t expropriate LEVIEV’S mansion instead of the other way around?

For more images of Leviev’s obscenely ostentacious new digs visit this Telegraph photo spread.

What Do Susan Sarandon, Alan Dershowitz and the Russian Mob Have in Common?

Thursday, December 27th, 2007
Susan sarandon denise rich isabella rosseliniSusan Sarandon, Denise Rich & Isabella Rosselini at Leviev opening (Scott Wintrow/Getty Images)

I hope that title grabbed your attention. They shouldn’t have anything in common, right? The first a progressive, the second a troglodyte. Well, unfortunately they do. They both like diamonds. Nothing wrong with that you might say. Unless the diamonds come from African conflict zones and unless their proceeds are used to build West Bank settlements on confiscated Palestinian land. All of which is true.

Susan Sarandon has a taste for diamonds and the high life and so attended the glittering opening of Lev Leviev’s new Madison Avenue jewelry emporium. She was joined in the crowd by other celebrities like Isabella Rosselini, Dr. Ruth Westheimer and Denise Rich (maybe she was there to arrange a “pardon” for Leviev as she did for her ex, Marc Rich). Problem was that to enter the store Sarandon had to cross a picket line established by Adala NY, a group of human rights adherents who oppose the Israeli Occupation. Despite the cause, Sarandon crossed. Not only that. Jewish Voice for Peace wrote a subsequent letter asking her to voice her opposition to Leviev’s pro-settlement activities. The response–silence. Well, not exactly. The NY Post’s Page Six quotes a representative saying that Sarandon has no “tie” to Leviev and thus nothing to renounce. Which is basically a casuistic non-answer.

lev leviev & roman abramovichRoman Abramovich & Lev Leviev, Tel Aviv (Nir Keidar/Getty Images)

Lev Leviev grew up in Tashkent as a member of the Bukharan community. He came to Israel as a teenager and eventually joined the Israeli diamond industry producing polished diamonds. He has become wealthy in his chosen profession by trafficking in Angolan diamonds. Walter Ruby, writing in Jewish Week, notes that Forbes lists him as the 210th richest person in the world worth $4.1 billion (Zev Chafets says that Leviev’s associates estimate his real worth as closer to $8 billion). He also funds the Chabad-dominated Federation of Jewish Communities of Russia.

Also disturbing is Leviev’s participation in the Land Redemption Fund, which purchases land under false pretenses from Palestinian owners in order to transfer them to settlement ownership. Leviev’s development company is also building several settlements including a $230 million project on land confiscated from the Palestinian village of Bilin, which is in the international news because of weekly protests there against the Apartheid Wall. Leviev and the LRF use Palestinian stooges to approach Palestinian farmers, many of whom can no longer farm their land anyway due either to the Wall or settler intimidation, offering to pay many times what the land is worth. As far as the farmers know the land is being purchased by a fellow Palestinian. Instead, the land reverts to LRF and then becomes land that Leviev can build settlements on, further increasing his empire after selling the homes to settlers.

The residents of Bilin and Jayyous recently wrote to Sarandon asking her to take up their cause against settlements encroaching on their land.

I should amend my post title by acknowledging that Lev Leviev is not a member of the Russian mob. He’s way beyond that. His money has bought him respectability that every shady character craves, even as he continues pillaging poor Palestinian farmers as he makes hundreds of millions of dollars and perverts the chances for peace between Israel and the Palestinians.

Recently, Leviev decided to expand his diamond and real estate business to New York, where he owns property worth well over $1 billion including the Plaza Hotel and New York Times building ($525 million). The store opening and accompanying protest was covered by The Forward and JTA, which indicates a rapidly changing political climate in the American Jewish community. Until recently, such a story would’ve been met with skepticism or derision by much of the Jewish community and press. It also indicates that Adalah NY had created dramatic protest imagery that would appeal to New York’s mass media.

As the photo above indicates, Leviev is linked with former Russian mobster and now oligarch, Roman Abramovich in the diamond business. Abramovich, in attempting to smooth his path into international business and social circles also purchased the Chelsea football club. Leviev, not to be outdone, also owns an Israeli football club. According to Haaretz, Leviev and Abramovich are among the two largest donors to Elad, whose goal is the “Judaize” East Jerusalem by buying up Arab property and transferring it to Jewish ownership. Elad refused to disclose its donor list publicly and is in danger of being dissolved by the government.

Surprisingly, the NY Post’s Page Six has kept the story alive with periodic updates–probably because the right-wing paper seeks to embarrass the progressive Sarandon. What is a shame is that with a short note to the public Sarandon could reaffirm her commitment to support ending the Occupation and tell the world she knew nothing about Leviev’s right-wing agenda and had no intention of shopping in his store again. Instead, she’s trying to fudge the issue.

As for Dershowitz, ever the entertaining clown, Dersh must’ve seen the brouhaha and decided he needed to get a slice of Sarandon’s PR. So he went down to the Leviev showroom and came out swinging his shopping bag as if it contained Norman Finkelstein’s head. All of which is quite interesting when you consider that during his Democracy Now debate with the latter he said that he opposed Israeli settlements. How quickly they forget. After watching Dershowitz’s pathetic primping performance in this video you realize that he’s nothing more than an ambulance chaser for political notoriety, a Jewish Ann Coulter.

Seattle Tacoma Airport Bans Christmas and Hanukah and…Anything Else

Monday, December 11th, 2006


The Seattle Times (one of my local papers) today reports that what started out as a local tempest in a teacup now threatens to tear up the national newswire. The Seattle-Tacoma International Airport (known as Seatac) until recently had a display of plastic “Holiday” trees in its public concourse. That’s when all Hell seemed to break loose:

Sea-Tac Airport officials were hoping to avoid controversy when they had maintenance crews working Friday’s graveyard shift dismantle nine holiday trees festooned with red ribbons and bows.

The airport managers ordered the plastic trees removed and boxed up after a rabbi asked to have an 8-foot-tall menorah displayed next to the largest tree in the international arrival hall.

Port of Seattle staff felt adding the menorah would have required adding symbols for other religions and cultures in the Northwest, said Terri-Ann Betancourt, the airport’s spokeswoman. The holidays are the busiest season at the airport, she said, and staff didn’t have time to play cultural anthropologists.

“We decided to take the trees down because we didn’t want to be exclusive,” she said. “We’re trying to be thoughtful and respectful, and will review policies after the first of the year.”

Seatac holiday treeHoliday trees in “hiding” at Seatac (from ABC News video)

That Chabad rabbi took one look at those trees and said, “Nothing doing.” When he approached the Port of Seattle (which operates the air and seaport) with his menorah offer, he doubtless brought along a lawyer to ensure that the Port understood the “sincerity” of his religious convictions–and his willingness to sue their asses if they didn’t accede.

The Port naturally got a little panicky. And when public entities get panicky they almost always do some bonehead thing or other. They hired a First Amendment attorney to advise them. He must’ve told them: “Well, if you display trees as a symbol of a religious season, you’ve got to allow the menorah. And for that matter, you might also have to honor Id al Fitr, Kwanza and a host of other holidays if their adherents demand it. That was just too much religious expression for the Port Commissioners to contemplate.

So just like Mr. ‘Bah Humbug’ Scrooge in Dickens’ Christmas Carol, the Port told Rabbi Bogomilsky, “nein, a dank” and put the trees back in storage. Now, there will be no holiday celebration at Seatac. Which puts Seattle in the foolish position of essentially denying what everyone knows–that there IS a holiday season going on around us whether Seatac acknowledges it or not.

Furthermore, if Sean Hannity and Bill O’Reilly haven’t already jumped on this story, they will shortly. It’s tailor made for their 30-second sound byte attention span. It’s all too easy to make Seatac look like bungling “politically correct” petty bureaucrats who’re trying to steal Christmas from the good people of our fair city. No doubt, tomorrow the Christian evangelical community from the city’s east side will be demonstrating in force at Seatac.

Here are some suggestions on what they could’ve/should’ve done. If the Port felt it didn’t have enough time to organize a holiday display, they should’ve announced to the public that while there would be no display THIS year, but that they planned to have such a display next year after consulting with the city’s major religious groups. But my main point is that there SHOULD be displays by major religious groups represented within Seattle’s local population. Why not show respect for Id al Fadr, Kwanza, and Hanukah–in addition to Christmas? What are they afraid of? Too much religious expression?

The Port’s official reaction to the affair has been entirely unpersuasive. These are people clearly who are either unused to public controversy or else completely incompetent at managing it when it comes to them, as it has in this case:

Craig Watson, the port’s chief lawyer, said [Rabbi] Bogomilsky’s menorah likely fits the Supreme Court’s definition of secular [and hence would be a constitutional display]. But the Port did not want to set the precedent of allowing an outside group [Chabad] to erect a holiday display at the airport, he said, and staff was too busy with holiday traffic to deal with the complexities of doing it themselves.

While I’m not wild about the idea of Chabad, which I consider to be a theological-political right-wing expression of Judaism, setting up shop on the public concourse, what would be so bad about allowing them to do it if the Airport didn’t want to maintain the menorah display itself? And what would’ve been so complicated about the Airport staff putting it up and maintaining it?? Do these people have any idea of how easily this thing could’ve been resolved with an ounce of seychel (“common sense”)? You buy a large menorah. You stand it in the Concourse, turn on the light. How complicated is that?

Another Commissioner perfectly exhibited the Henny Penny affect in his comments:

“I felt we’d also have to put up Islamic, Hindu, Buddhist, Jewish symbols. Where does it stop?” said Commissioner John Creighton.

Omigod, if we let one do it they’ll all want to. Pretty soon we’ll have Wiccans and Fire-Worshippers and God knows what. We just can’t have that.

The Port Commissioners will meet Tuesday and might reconsider their decision. If they do, let’s hope they use a little common sense and honor Christmas AND Hanukah, at least.

The Seattle PI’s story is here.

It’s important to add that the ABC national news story got it completely wrong when the reporter intoned: “The Port decided to take down the Christmas trees after a Jewish religious leader complained that they were offensive.” And I’m afraid that ABC and affiliate websites also have it wrong. KXLY, Spokane’s ABC affiliate says: “The Port allowed “holiday” decorations to remain but decided to take down all the Christmas trees after a Seattle rabbi complained they were offensive.” Looks like it’s blame-the-Jews time. For the record, this isn’t what Bogomilsky said. He has absolutely no objection to holiday trees unless they are the ONLY religious symbols displayed. For anyone who claims the media lie–well in this case ABC was just plain stupid. But stupidity can stir up religious-ethnic tension just as easily as lying. So let’s make sure that the right-wing media mafia at FOX don’t mess up (I was actually thinking of a bit stronger word here) the story as this reporter did.

I’ve complained to ABCNews.com. Let’s see if I even get an answer. By the way, so far FoxNews’ coverage of the story (largely derived from AP and local coverage) is accurate. But that doesn’t necessarily mean that bozos like Hannity, O’Reilly, Limbaugh or Savage will be.

UPDATE: It’s Christmas 1-Hanukah O as the Port decides to put the Christmas trees back up but gives a cold shoulder to Chabad’s offer to provide a menorah for the Airport’s displays. The Port, in its own charmless way, has embraced the old Brooklyn Dodger fans’ perennial slogan: “Wait till next year.”