Mahzor

New York Public Library

Churches

Sarajevo Haggadah

Mah Nishtanah

Sarajevo haggadah

Antaea Darom

Israeli women's art

Action

Torah as music

Ben Heine

Action

ceramic bowl

Mohammad Said Kalash, "Offering Reconciliation" exhibit (photo: Ilan Amihai)

Action

Punch and Judy/Pinchas and Jamila

Avi Katz

Action

David Grossman

Ben Heine

Action

Eldrige Street shul

Lower East Side

Action

Dove

Ben Heine

Action

Two birds

Hoda Jamal

Action

Israeli and Palestinian boys

from documentary, Promises

Action

Cat in the Hat

Yiddish version

Action

Daylight through the Wall

Banksy: graffiti art on Separation Wall

Action

Maurice Sendak's Brundibar set

New Victory Theater (photo: Nan Melville/NYT)

Action

Daniel Barenboim, West-Eastern Divan Orchestra

Palestinian-Israeli musical ensemble (photo: Kerstin Joensson/AP)

Action

Great Day on Eldrige Street

N.Y.'s klezmer greats celebrate shul rededication (photo: Leo Sorel)

Action

Joint Appeal for Peace

(Avi Katz)

Joint Appeal for Peace

Ketubah, Ancona, Italy (1772)

(Jewish Theological Seminary library)

Ancona ketubah

Posts Tagged ‘ben zion netanyahu’

Netanyahu Family’s Racist History: Like Father, Like Son

Tuesday, July 12th, 2011
yair netanyahu facebook profile

Yair Netanyahu's Facebook profile caption: '...The Palestinians, may they be cursed'

Jewish tradition declares that children shall not be punished for the sins of their fathers.  But it didn’t anticipate a son like the 19 year-old Yair Netanyahu, who appears to retain some of the harsh Arab-hatred that characterizes both his father, Benyamin, and 98 year-old grandfather, Ben Zion.  I have written here of the latter’s call for hanging Arabs in the nearest town square to teach them who’s boss, a punishment he contends that was quite effective in the Ottoman era.  Apparently, he doesn’t realize that the despotic Muslim Ottomans may not be the political model he wishes Israel to emulate.  In 1989, Benyamin, his father advocated expelling Israeli Palestinian citizens from the State in a comment I’d personally never heard until I read it and published it here.

The apple doesn’t fall far from the tree, as they say.  Here are a few of the choice racist comments (and a shorter English article) this excellent expose by Uri Blau attributes to Yair Netanyahu via his Facebook page.  A few years ago at a time when Ehud Olmert was prime minister, riots broke out in the formerly Arab town of Akko (Acre), when an Israeli Palestinian mistakenly drove into an Orthodox community on Yom Kippur (a day when driving is forbidden).  The result was this Facebook page created by the younger Netanyahu which stated:

As a Result of the Akko Pogroms, I Too Boycott Arab Businesses!

Those Arab sons of whores desecrated the holiest day of our year.  This wasn’t in Syria or in Egypt.  It was right here in the State of Israel–the Jewish nation’s only state.  Because the leftist authorities won’t do anything regarding this matter and because the media will only trot out [before the cameras] the “poor Arabs,” it is up to us to do the minimum to restore our self-respect by boycotting all Arab businesses and products.  Besides, I boycotted these shits even before!

Despite Netanyahu’s appeal for members to join the group, only 23 did, which seems a pretty lame performance for a soldier who serves now in the IDF international press liaison office (can’t you just hear Avital Leibovich, one of the army’s top PR flacks saying to a scrum of journalists, “anyone care for an interview with the prime minister’s son??”).  It may be a mark of the degradation of the IDF’s core service values that Yair’s uncle, Yonatan, died a hero as a member of the elite unit that assaulted the Entebbe Airport in 1976, while his nephew serves as a military PR flack in 2011.  How the mighty have fallen!

Returning to his Facebook account, just after the murder of the Fogel family by Palestinian militants, Netanyahu wrote this under the assumed name, Jesse Netan.  My editorial comments are in italics, I couldn’t help myself!:

We Jews and Christians celebrate life and love, you Muslims celebrate hatred and death!  I attended the funeral and saw the five bodies including the littlest of the babies [ed., this isn't truthful as one does not see bodies at a Jewish funeral, only caskets].  When we Israelis accidentally harm a Palestinian boy in Gaza the entire nation mourns for the child of the enemy [ed., what country is he living in??] half the army goes to prison and we pay a lot of money to the family [ed., what planet is he living on??].   We have enough power to destroy Gaza in five minutes, but we operate there with utmost care against terrorists who intend to harm our citizens and to turn their own citizens into human shields.

Further, after the murder of this innocent family, they danced and celebrated in the streets, precisely like after 9/11!

Terror has a religion and it is Islam.  Not every Muslim is a terrorist but every terrorist is a Muslim.  Have you ever heard of anyone killing themselves with a bomb in the name of Jesus or Moses [ed., I suppose he forgot Masada and Trumpeldor]?  NO!  People blow themselves up only in the name of Allah!

There is no such thing as a Palestinian state.  It is part of Israel.  There never in history has been a Palestinian state.  There is no such state and I hope there never will be.  Palestinians are Arabs who settled in our country, but who emigrated from other Arab countries less than 100 years ago.

A mere two hours after Blau first turned to the IDF press office for a comment on the Facebook profile it was closed to public view.   The army explained that Yair had been told what the expectations of him were and that he could not talk politics on his Facebook account.  Of course, the IDF had no problem in general with the specific rage-filled/rejectionist racist views he expressed, only with the fact that they were “political.”

The family’s attorney strangely attempted to argue that Haaretz played a dirty trick on the young man by wrenching his comments “out of context.”  Can he possibly explain in what context such comments might be acceptable??  He goes on to argue that some of the comments were made when the boy was a mere lad of 16 and a private individual (as if this makes them less offensive).  He calls this a “cynical use of a young boy’s words.”  And yes, of course the lawyer plays the Holocaust card, claiming that Yair was so overwrought because he was reacting to the anti-Semitic outburst of John Galliano, as the grandson of a man who lost his entire family in the Holocaust.

The family lawyer’s final words reek of hypocrisy and mendacity:

Yair is prepared to respect anyone who is ready to live in peace with Israel, whatever his identity.  His parents, the prime minister and his wife believe in moderation and tolerance [!] and they respect every individual without respect to their religion [!], ethnicity or national affiliation and so they raised their son.

No mention of course of Bibi’s call for expulsion of Israel’s Palestinian citizens and how that squares with his life lived in moderation and tolerance.

Ben Zion Netanyahu on Bibi’s Political Duplicity

Sunday, April 5th, 2009

Noam Sheizaf has published the third portion of his translation of the Maariv interview with Ben Zion Netanyahu, Bibi’s father.  There is one particularly salient passage which attests to the subtlety with which the son disguises the extremism of his political views:

Q: How much do you think you’ve influenced his opinions today?

A: “I have a general idea. Bibi might aim for the same goals as mine, but he keeps to himself  the ways to achieve them, because if he expressed them, he would expose his goals.

Q: Is that what you wish?

A: “No, I just believe that it could be so. Because he is smart. Because he is very careful. Because he has his ways to handle himself. I am talking about tactics regarding the revealing of theories that people with different ideology might not accept. That’s why he doesn’t expose them: because of the reaction from his enemies as well as from the people whose support he seeks. It’s an assumption, but it might be so.”

Every politician engages in the art of duplicity and concealment of their true views and goals.  So it’s no surprise that Bibi’s father reveals the son to be full of artifice and guile in this regard.  But this certainly should put every Israeli, the EU, and the Obama administration on notice not to believe a word that exits Bibi’s mouth regarding his willingness to promote peace.

That aspect of his agenda is transparent and much closer to his father’s views than anyone else’s.  There can be no peace with the Palestinians and probably not with the Syrians either if it involves returning the Golan.  To do so would violate a fundamental right-wing ideological belief in the integrity of the whole land of Israel.

Such awareness of Netanyahu’s intransigence sets up a showdown with the EU and U.S. governments at some point in the future.  The only question is whether both parties, but especially Barack Obama has the spine and stomach for mortal combat with a Netanyahu government.

For now, everyone will lay low to see whether Lieberman is indicted and how that episode plays out.  For if the government falls on Lieberman’s withdrawal from the cabinet and coalition, then all bets are off.  Livni could bring Kadima into the government and Netanyahu might indeed be willing to change his spots (as unlikely as that appears).

But if the composition of the current rightist coalition remains the same, then there will have to be such a confrontation.  I don’t know what form it will take and what the result will be.  But it will certainly be interesting to watch.  If the coalition remains rightist and there is no confrontation, then you can bet on war over the coming years: certainly a war in Gaza and perhaps one with Hezbollah or Syria.  The only thing that is certain is that the status quo means death and war for many on both sides.  But then again, this is something Ben Zion Netanyahu fully anticipates–all out war to the death with the Arab enemy.  The question is whether Bibi thinks like his father or has any independent ideas whatsoever.

Ben Zion Netanyahu: Israeli Arab Goal ‘To Exterminate Us’

Sunday, April 5th, 2009

This is the second installment of Ben Zion Netanyahu’s Maariv interview translated by Noam Sheizaf and published originally at his Promised Land blog.

In case any of you were worried that, as in Hollywood, the sequel would disappoint compared to the original–have no fear.  You will NOT be disappointed.  The revelations of racist hatred for Arabs in general, and Israeli Arabs in particular is unabated.  Here are a few of the prime excerpts:

Netanyahu: …In the Arabs’ case, their nature and character won’t allow any compromise. When they talk of compromise, it’s a way of deceiving. They want to make the other side stop doing its best efforts and fall into the trap of compromising. The [Israeli] Left helps them with that goal…Compromise is not realistic. It weakens our positions and brings us to a state of limpness, of false believes, of illusions. Every illusion is weakening.”

Q: What is your position regarding Syria? There are those who claim that Netanyahu will try to advance there.

A: “I would not return the Golan Heights. We conquered the Golan…and anyway, you don’t give back land that was conquered in war, and for which we spilled our blood. It should be clear that parts of the Land of Israel that will fall into our hands – we will defend our right to hold them until all generations end. You don’t return land, just like you don’t return people…”

“We don’t have a real partnership with them [Israeli Arabs]. The Arab citizens’ goal is to destroy us. They don’t deny that they want to destroy us. Except for a small minority who is willing to live with us under certain agreements because of the economical benefits they receive, the vast majority of the Israeli Arabs would choose to exterminate us if they had the option to do so. Because of our power they can’t say this, so they keep quiet and concentrate in their daily life.

I think we should speak to the Israeli Arabs in the language they understand and admire – the language of force. If we act with strength on any crime they [commit], they will understand we show no forgiveness. Had we used this language from the start, they would have been more careful.

I am talking about strength that is based on justice. They should know that we will keep a just attitude towards them, but a tough one. You don’t kill or hurt people or deny their right to make a living just like that. In the villages that we rule, we need to grant them all the rights – infrastructure, and transportation and education… but they have to give things in return. If the teachers are inciting the students, we should close the schools and expel the teachers…”

Most of the disgusting rhetoric exposed here is self-explanatory and requires no rebuttal or clarification.  Any reasonable person will understand immediately what the real value of such ideas is.

But one point in particular requires refutation.  The elder Netanyahu’s claim that Israeli Arabs “would choose to exterminate us” if they had half a chance is a bald-faced lie.  One can explain this away perhaps by Netanyahu’s having no knowledge either direct (or apparently even indirect) of real Israeli Arabs due to the fact that he lived most of life in the U.S.  But any reasonably intelligent human being, even a rightist, would know that Israeli Arabs are surprisingly loyal to the State of Israel.  Every poll of this community points to an almost universal urge to be included within the overall Israeli polity, to fit in, even to assimilate if that were possible (it isn’t).

Despite the horrific crime of displacing 700,000 of their fellow Arabs in 1948, there were hardly any acts of violence committed by them against Palmach forces.  Aside from a few incidents which stand for their being exceptions rather than the rule, there have been almost no Israeli Arab acts of terror since.  Those of the Israeli right like to point to those few incidents to claim they represent the “true views” of their fellow Arabs, but this is certainly not the case.

To be forthright, today’s news reveals that a 16 year old Negev Bedouin girl fired at Israeli Border Police today attempting to avenge the Gaza assault and was killed.  But this must be balanced against the fact that the Bedouin are one of the only Arab ethnic groups with DO serve in the IDF and do so with great distinction.

Anyone who listens to Bibi Netanyahu speak and harkens not just to the actual words, but to the tone and what is “between the lines” knows that the hateful views of his father course through his veins.  The difference between them is that the father is of the old school and wears his ideas on his sleeve.  The son conceals his real views and feelings through artifice and guile.

There may be a few Middle East analysts who harbor hopes that Netanyahu, being a strong rightist in the Sharon mold, might actually be capable of negotiating an Israeli peace with the Syrians or, God forbid, with the Palestinians.  Given where this man has come from and the hatred inculcated in him by his father for all Arabs, I’d say the optimists will be sorely disappointed to place any such hopes in the new Israeli prime minister.

On a side note, given the importance of this story and the fact that no other English-language news source is yet reporting it aside from Noam and myself, you’d think that Google News would be an excellent means of distributing word about it.  But no, I’ve tried unsuccessfully for several years to get this blog included within Google News.

A few weeks ago, I noticed that Mondoweiss was now included (good for him) and so I checked to see whether their rules had changed.  I realized that they hadn’t but that Phil Weiss had added Adam Horowitz as a co-author of his blog which allowed it to be included.

Here are the wickedly dumb rules the define who’s in and who’s out:

We reviewed your site and are unable to include it in Google News at this time. We currently only include articles from sources that could be considered organizations, generally characterized by multiple writers and editors, availability of organizational information, and accessible contact information. When we reviewed your site we weren’t able to find this evidence of an organization.

While I respect Phil immensely and would love to see Mondoweiss as a powerful movement for change–to call it an “organization” is pushing it.  This rule is simply a way that Google News gets out of having to consider blogs written by individual authors.  They’d rather lose a source like me than have to waste their time considering all the faux news blogs who would claim their attention by applying for consideration.

The only problem with this approach is that not only does Google News lose out by failing to include important news sources like this story, but the work of this blog loses out through the hundreds of thousands of readers who visit Google News and will not see this story.

Google News is a major source of readers for those sites included within it.  It’s just a shame that Tikun Olam and many other legitimate news blogs are cast out of the inner circle.

Bibi’s Father’s Answer to the ‘Arab Problem”: Hang’ Em in the Town Square

Saturday, April 4th, 2009
Ben Zion Netanyahu on Arabs: hang em high

Ben Zion Netanyahu on Arabs: hang 'em high

Imagine, if you will, if Barack Obama’s real father was Rev. Jeremiah Wright and imagine, if you will, that Wright gave an eight-page interview to USA Today the week of Obama’s inauguration.  Then you can imagine the “interest” with which such a Maariv interview with Bibi Netanyahu’s father was met in Israeli circles.

Noam Sheizaf, who works for Maariv, has translated portions of the interview in his blog (here is the original Hebrew story) and it’s an eye-opener to say the least.  A bit of introduction about the elder Netanyahu and his political biography is important:

In today’s political world, Prof. Netanyahu will be considered an extreme right wing man. In fact, Prof. Netanyahu says that because of his views, he was never offered a teaching job in one of Israel’s universities (he is a world expert on medieval Jewish history). I tend to believe him. He was also one of the leaders of the US Zionist movement, and personal secretary to the founder of the Revisionist movement, Zeev Jabotinsky.

After reading this, you will understand why Bibi’s people tried for a week to get the interview squashed, even appealing to the publisher.  The latter agreed to the unprecedented compromise of having Bibi’s brother review the interview to ensure it reflected his father’s real views (he is 99 years-old).  We don’t know what role the brother played in the finished product.  But after reading the interview and knowing a family member reviewed it, you can’t imagine how it could’ve been any worse.

The elder Netanyahu’s comments recall the racist anti-Arab remarks made by Rahm Emanuel’s father after his son was named U.S. chief of staff.  And in truth, the elder Emanuel was, like Ben Zion Netanyahu, a follower of the most extreme right-wing nationalist elements of early Zionism.  So it’s no wonder that their world view is replete with the worst anti-Arab racism and hate.

And without further ado, I give you, Ben Zion Netanyahu, the father of the man:

Netanyahu: “I don’t see any signs that the Arabs want peace… we will face fierce attacks from the Arabs, and we must react firmly…We just handed them a strong blow in Gaza, and they still bargain with us over one hostage… if we gave them a blow that would really hurt them, they would have given us Gilad Shalit back.”

Q: Operation “cast Lead” was one of the worst blows we handed on a civilian population.

A: “That’s not enough. It’s possible that we should have hit harder.”

Q: You don’t like the Arabs, to say the least.

A: “The Bible finds no worse image than this of the man from the desert. And why? Because he has no respect for any law. Because in the desert he can do as he pleases.

The tendency towards conflict is in the essence of the Arab. He is an enemy by essence. His personality won’t allow him any compromise or agreement. It doesn’t matter what kind of resistance he will meet, what price he will pay. His existence is one of perpetuate war.

Q: Is there any hope of peace?

A: …No…The two states solution doesn’t exist. There are no two people here. There is a Jewish people and an Arab population… there is no Palestinian people, so you don’t create a state for an imaginary nation… they only call themselves a people in order to fight the Jews.”

Q: So what’s the solution?

A: “No solution but force… strong military rule. Any outbreak will bring upon the Arabs enormous suffering. We shouldn’t wait for a big mutiny to start, but rather act immediately with great force to prevent them from going on…

If it’s possible, we should conquer any disputed territory in the land of Israel. Conquer and hold it, even if it brings us years of war. We should conquer Gaza, and parts of the Galil, and the Golan. This will bring upon us a bloody war, since war is difficult for us – we don’t have a lot of territory, while the Arabs have lots of space to retreat to. But that’s the only way to survive here.”

There is valuable experience [on this matter] we don’t pay notice to. I mean the Ottoman rule over the Arabs. The Turks ruled over the Arabs for 400 years, and there was peace and quiet everywhere. The Arabs hated the Ottomans, but every little thing they did brought mass killings and hanging in towns squares. They were hanging people in Damascus, and Izmir… every town had hanging posts in its center…the Arabs were so badly beaten, they didn’t dare revolt. Naturally, I don’t recommend the use of hangings as a show of force like the Turks did, I just want to show that the only thing that might move the Arabs from the rejectionist position is force.

A word of context here.  I don’t claim that Bibi Netanyahu holds the same beliefs as his father and I don’t believe (along with the Bible) that the sins of fathers are visited on the sons.

In fact, Bibi, unlike his dad, has few real principles of his own and would gladly shed any of his father’s if it would add to his political power.  As I’ve written here, Bibi is a smooth operator, not a man of ideas.  In a way, you have to admire the father for holding consistent and transparent views of Arabs.  At least he says what he means.  Bibi is much more wily and vacuous than that.  He has few if any principles.

It is interesting to compare the current political power brokers of the Israeli political right who are scions of the  Zionist radical right pre-1948 generation.  All of them, Tzipi Livni, Ehud Olmert, and Bibi Netanyahu have liberated themselves, to a greater or lesser extent from the purity and radicalism of their parents views.  All have become political apparatchiks, rather than ideologues.  Livni to a greater extent and Olmert to a lesser extent, developed a pragmatism that opened them to new ideas and turned them to the political center.  Bibi remains stuck–without the purity of his father’s views, but without any openness to new ideas–on the extreme right.  I suppose you could call him a pragmatic rightist, but only in the sense that he believes in very little the right stands for, except wielding power.

But what is interesting here is to see where Bibi’s ideas come from and to read them expressed in their purest and most virulent form.  The younger Netanyahu is too slick to use the snarling articulations of his father.  But everything the former does believe is rooted in this (the father’s) stifling, hate-filled world view.  And while you will never hear Bibi call for eternal war and vigilance against the evil Arab foe as his father does, that is where Bibi’s policies will lead Israel.  So in that sense there is a consonance in the views of father and son.

Performance Optimization WordPress Plugins by W3 EDGE