Mahzor

New York Public Library

Churches

Sarajevo Haggadah

Mah Nishtanah

Sarajevo haggadah

Antaea Darom

Israeli women's art

Action

Torah as music

Ben Heine

Action

ceramic bowl

Mohammad Said Kalash, "Offering Reconciliation" exhibit (photo: Ilan Amihai)

Action

Punch and Judy/Pinchas and Jamila

Avi Katz

Action

David Grossman

Ben Heine

Action

Eldrige Street shul

Lower East Side

Action

Dove

Ben Heine

Action

Two birds

Hoda Jamal

Action

Israeli and Palestinian boys

from documentary, Promises

Action

Cat in the Hat

Yiddish version

Action

Daylight through the Wall

Banksy: graffiti art on Separation Wall

Action

Maurice Sendak's Brundibar set

New Victory Theater (photo: Nan Melville/NYT)

Action

Daniel Barenboim, West-Eastern Divan Orchestra

Palestinian-Israeli musical ensemble (photo: Kerstin Joensson/AP)

Action

Great Day on Eldrige Street

N.Y.'s klezmer greats celebrate shul rededication (photo: Leo Sorel)

Action

Joint Appeal for Peace

(Avi Katz)

Joint Appeal for Peace

Ketubah, Ancona, Italy (1772)

(Jewish Theological Seminary library)

Ancona ketubah

Posts Tagged ‘ben-gurion-airport’

Israel: ‘Be Afraid, Be Very Afraid’

Wednesday, July 6th, 2011

Whenever peace activists devise a new means of challenging Israel’s Occupation, whether it be BDS, Nakba protests, the Gaza Flotilla, the September UN vote on Palestinian statehood, or the Flight of Return, the primary response from Israel seems something verging on outright or barely controlled hysteria.  Bibi Netanyahu said recently that this Friday’s Ben Gurion protest is an attempt to undermine “Israel’s right to exist.”  Excuse me?  A few hundred peace activists converging non-violently on Ben Gurion airport in order to affirm their right to travel to Palestine is an existential threat to the “Jewish state?”

Ynet published a story today  (and in English) which characterized the prevailing emotion within the government regarding the upcoming protest as “complete hysteria:”

Undercover officers will patrol the airport.  All flights from Europe will disembark at an isolated spot at the airport [fearing terrorism are we?].  Departures will be delayed and all passengers will be searched before boarding.  Israel approaches the protest at fever pitch.  ”Everyone is in a state of hysteria,” said one government source after a meeting hosted by Internal Security minister Yitzhak Aharonovitz and attended by Netanyahu, senior police officials and the relevant authorities at Ben Gurion, all of whom detailed the steps there were taking to confront the hundreds of expected protesters.

…The prime minister listened to presentations about the plans for each agency and how they would adhere to international law [after all, it might be a tad embarrassing to see the blood of peaceful protesters splattered on the walls of Israel's international airport--that's something expected more of tyrants like Lukashenko].

It’s a bit like the old May Day parades in Red Square in which the Soviet military used to proudly showcase its new military hardware before a beaming Fearless Leader.  The problem with this paranoid thought process is that ANY sign of support for Palestine becomes automatically a threat to Israel’s existence.  When you turn everything into such a zero sum game, you leave practically no room for compromise, which is precisely as Bibi prefers it.

Another interesting feature of the government’s plans is the expectation that airlines will obey Israeli instructions to prevent specific passengers from boarding flights, which places these international companies in the position of enforcing Israel’s Occupation policies.  Israeli authorities are especially concerned that the protesters will “misbehave,” attempt to wave placards, shout slogans, attack at the check in counter, and otherwise delegitimize the “Jewish state.”  There is a generalized fear of those who wish to engage in unspecified “provocations.”

Each arriving flight will be met by a team of police officers and flights will be staggered so as not to allow the intruders to mass themselves in the airport at any particular time.  In no uncertain terms, the authorities will refuse to allow order to be disturbed at the airport.  They aver however that the treatment the activists will receive is reserved for those who disturb the peace, but such treatment does not mean they’re considered terrorists, God forbid:

It’s important not to forget that we’re not talking here about armed activists.

But are we really sure of that?  Have they checked with Danny Ayalon to see whether he’s put his finger to the wind to detect the presence of gun powder or sulfur on the persons of these wicked no-goodniks?

One genius from the government even had this flash of insight:

The interest of the foreign airlines is first and foremost that there not be pictures of Israeli police beating protesters, something that would affect the number of tourists who plan to spend the summer in Israel.  And so these companies interest is aligned with that of Israel.

There was an implicit warning from Israeli sources that some airlines might refuse to return some of the travelers to their home country for fear of the potential for violence.  It wasn’t clear whether they were talking about the potential for violence on the Israeli side or the passengers’ side.  But we can infer it was the latter.  And as usual absolutely no proof is offered that any passenger intends to engage in violence or even that the airlines would contemplate refusing to fly someone home from Israel.

An official of the Internal Security ministry did note that it’s possible that the infiltrators have already entered the body politic, where they may be passing their ideas and even bodily fluids directly into the minds and bodies of Israelis.

The same level of paranoid fear characterizes an impending decision by the IDF to refuse to identify by name any senior officers either in the media or any public forum.  Maariv reports the new regulations are meant to address a fear of exposing them to legal prosecution after wars like Cast Lead and Lebanon II.  Officers’ pictures will also be pixellated to prevent their further identification.  Israel already does this with its intelligence personnel, who may not be named during active service or even after they leave the service.  But the new rules would place IDF officers under deep cover as well, and further shield the military from the gaze of NGOs and “Israeli left-wing extremists” seeking to ensure that Israel adheres to standards of international law in its treatment of Palestinians.  In fact, one important feature of this blog is revealing the identity of individuals (such as Doron Zahavi/Captain George) who may have committed specific acts which would qualify as crimes or war crimes.  Since Israel and Israelis can no longer do this for themselves in most cases, someone has to do it.

The IDF attributes the new policy to the “Goldstone Effect” and links it as well to efforts by Palestinian activists to bring Israeli officials and officers to justice outside Israel.

You could be forgiven for imagining that Israel is beginning to sound like Geena Davis’ character in The Fly when she warns: “Be afraid, be very afraid.”

Israel Drops Sex Harrassment Charge Against Palestinian Researcher Who Fought Back During Intrusive Security Check

Friday, January 21st, 2011
israeli security guard assaults honida gaanam at ben gurion

Dr. Honida Gaanam, sexually demeaned during security check at Ben Gurion. Guilty of flying while Arab. (Tomer Applebaum)

18 months ago, Palestinian academic lecturer, Dr. Honida Gaanam, was trying to fly to France for an academic conference.  Her problem is that she was flying while Arab.  The Ben Gurion airport security guard began to search Ganaam’s bra invasively and the victim fought back by grabbing the guard’s bra and asking her whether she liked how it felt.  For this, the professor was charged with sexual assault (I kid you not).

Gaanam got herself a good lawyer from the Israeli Palestinian NGO Adallah and fought back.  The attorney argued that she suffered this degrading security check for one reason only,  she is Arab.  She and her lawyer told the government’s legal advisor that during her security check the contact became so degrading that it felt like a sexual attack on her and she could not suffer it in silence.  The academic later told security officials of her wish to file a complaint of sexual harrassment against the guard, but was told that the charge would be filed against her instead.

Though the government dismissed the criminal charges against her, it warned Ganaam that if she committed any illegal acts within a specified period it would renew these charges against her.

Authorities at Ben Gurion airport castigated Gaanam saying that she had ulterior motives in criticizing what is a necessary security procedure to ensure the safety of millions of air passengers.  Given the identical demeaning treatment meted out to Al Jazeera’s Israel correspondent last week during a security check before a foreign correspondents dinner with the prime minister, it would appear that the Shabak is training its female security personnel to deliberately degrade Palestinian women.  I suppose the IDF is doing such a good job of humiliating Palestinian men at checkpoints that the Shabak doesn’t want to be left too far behind in its treatment of women.

TSA Screwing Up Airport Security? Turn to Israel (NOT)

Wednesday, November 24th, 2010
welcome to israel

Welcome to Israel...unless you're Arab, Black, or carry the wrong slogans on your laptop

Why can’t the U.S. be more like Israel?

I’d like to do a forensic search to root out the origin of the latest media meme that, given the mess that TSA appears to be making of the new full body airport security screenings, we should turn to Israel as a model for how to do the job.  Chances are that we’ll discover that the meme was created by someone in the MFA or by an Israeli security consultant who stands to make millions if TSA takes the idea seriously enough to hire him.

Everyone from CNN to Reuters, to the august N.Y. Times has taken up the idea:

Amid the uproar that airport screening has become too intrusive, some Americans are now asking why the United States cannot do it like the Israelis.

Representative John L. Mica, Republican of Florida and a critic of the Obama administration’s new screening methods, says the Transportation Security Administration should look at Israel, which uses early detection techniques at airports. An editorial in The Washington Times last week praised El Al, the Israeli national airline, as employing the “smarter approach” of using “sophisticated intelligence analysis which allows them to predict which travelers constitute a possible threat and which do not.”

As it turns out, the security methods employed by Israel’s famous [!] Shin Bet security service at Ben-Gurion International Airport in Tel Aviv are frequently stricter and more intrusive than the full-body scanners and pat-downs American officials put into place Nov. 1

Before we drive a stake right through the heart of this stupid idea let’s understand what it entails.  The idea is that the philosophy of U.S. security is to find weapons or bombs before they get on the plane.  Israel’s system, or so goes the claim, is keyed to identify terrorists, not find their weapons.

There is a wee small problem with the characterization of Israel’s system.  It’s a sack of bull.  The claim is that the Israeli system is based on a complex set of psychological criteria, questioning and variables administered by a highly trained and skilled set of professional security experts who will suss out the terrorists from the average Joes.  Here’s what the Israeli system is based on: an ill-defined set of prejudices including criteria like skin color, ethnicity, name, stickers on your laptop, etc.  If you are not white, not Israeli, not Jewish you are in for a very hard time.  If you are black or Arab or have an Arab name fughgedaboudit.  Or as the saying used to go: “If you’re black, get back.”

Why can’t the U.S. be more like Israel?  Oh, I don’t know, maybe because we’re a democracy and take civil liberties seriously and Israel winks and nods at the notion.  Maybe because we know enough about racial and ethnic profiling to reject the notion especially when you establish it at the core of a nation’s airline screening process.  Maybe because we have a more balanced, nuanced understanding of the conflicting requirements of national security and individual liberty.

Here is a short summary of the posts I’ve written extolling the professionalism of Israeli airport security.  There was the case of the Alvin Ailey American African American dancer separated from her company due to her skin color.  The U.S. university president and former cabinet officer of Lebanese descent (yup, her name gave her away as an Arab terrorist) traveling to Israel to speak against BDS; the Hebrew University professor on her way to an academic conference until forced to part with her laptop.  Or the award-winning Israeli-Palestinian documentary filmmaker forced to strip naked by El Al security apparently because her award, bestowed by no less a personage than George Clooney, made her a terrorism suspect.  The American university professor on her way to an Israeli academic conference until called a terrorist by El Al security (she was likely confused with another person with the same name, who wrote in her online bio that as a child she lived in poor Pakistani and Iranian villages); or how about the daughter of the Israeli Supreme Court justice who herself was an Israel foreign ministry trainee harassed at the airport while being Arab; or the case of the American family refused exit from Israel for no more reason than that they didn’t have proper papers acknowledging they were Palestinian, when none of the detained children or mother were Palestinian (the father, who was not with them when detained was Palestinian);  Not to mention the individuals prevented from entering Israel for no security reason whatsoever aside from their undesirable political views opposing the Israeli Occupation.  Then there was the woman who had had a “dangerous” slogan stickered on her laptop, which earned it three bullets through the hard-drive.  And oh man, if you’re a Harvard Law student doing academic research on land disputes between the Bedouin and Israeli government, don’t even think about it.  And finally, we have the case of El Al security in South Africa demanding to search a dark-skinned airport visitor who wasn’t even flying.

Max Blumenthal once told me that on his last visit to Israel one of the questions the screener asked was which Hebrew school he attended.  I tell you, that’s the true scientific basis of Israeli airport screening!  Max also just asked how I’d imagine the Israelis would treat Barack Obama if they had their druthers.  Sample dialogue:

Shabak screener: What kind of name is Barack?

Obama: I believe it’s related to the same name as your defense minister, Ehud Barak.

Q: What about your middle name Hussein?  Are you Muslim?

A: No, I’m Christian actually.  But my father was a Kenyan Muslim.

Q: Did you say Muslim?  Can you step aside Mr. Obama?  We’ll be moving you to the Arab line.  You can expect to be shipped back to whereever you came from in, oh, about 9 hours.  Enjoy your stay in Israel (or at least an Israeli holding cell).

Here is a former Shin Bet security officer describing Israeli screening procedures:

“What we are trained [for] is to look for the immediate threat - the Muslim guy.

…“The crazy thing is that we are profiling people racially, ethnically and even on religious grounds … This is what we do.”

Periodically, after a few too many of these incidents garnering bad publicity, an Israeli official makes a big show of reforming the system so that no one will be singled out for prejudicial treatment.  But you remember the old Who song: “Here’s to the new boss, just like the old boss.”

So, please, the next time you read any more of this crap in the MSM tell them about these incidents and ask whether this is the system we want in the U.S.  Would we prefer some inconvenience and full body scans or outright ethnic profiling passing for sophisticated airport screening techniques?  If Israel wants good press I’m afraid it’s going to have to earn it.  And this isn’t the way.

Thankfully, this Washington Post writers hasn’t drunk the Kool-Aid.

Israel Humiliates U.S. University President Visiting to Oppose BDS

Friday, August 6th, 2010
donna shalala

Donna Shalala, former U.S. cabinet secretary and distinguished university president. As far as Israel is concerned: A-Rab.

This is the type of Alice in Wonderland universe in which Israel currently exists.  Donna Shalala, former Health and Human Services secretary under Bill Clinton and currently president of the University of Miami, participated in an American Jewish Congress anti-BDS dog and pony show in Israel recently.  On leaving Israel, she was stopped at Ben Gurion Airport by security goons who had not received word that she was supposed to have VIP status and not be harrassed as usually happens to other travelers with Arab names like hers.

This incident is rich in irony of course.  But the real kicker and the one that shows the psychological power of denial at work in Israeli officialdom is this:

An IAA [Israel Airport Authority] spokesperson reported in response: “This incident is unknown to us. We performed a thorough check. There was no contact made with us or any other body. No unusual events were registered at Ben Gurion Airport, and we have no idea about this incident, which, from our perspective, never happened.”

Of course there were no “unusual events” registered because it is entirely usual for the security goons to routinely harrass travelers such as Shalala.  You’d think that even if they didn’t have her on a VIP list that just hearing her recount her job title and the tour she had just participated in in Israel would be enough to make the numbskull who questioned her realize his or her mistake.  And why would Israel care about someone LEAVING Israel?  I can understand possibly exercising caution about someone entering the country.  But leaving??  This seems utterly gratuitous harrassment.  Sorry to say it seems to be SOP as far as Israel’s security apparatus is concerned.

I don’t suppose anyone in the Israeli government might want to apologize to her, given that she was there to support their BDS hasbara efforts, misguided as these might be??  Guys, this was your friend, someone who was singing from the hasbara handbook and this is the way you treat her?  Imagine how they treat people they know are the bad ‘uns.

Israeli Judge Calls for Full Hearing in Maan-Malsin Deportation Case

Monday, January 18th, 2010

Tel Aviv district judge Kobi Vardi calls for hearing on Malsin expulsion order

UPDATE: Judge Vardi has just ruled against the Israeli attorney general who argued that Jared Malsin should be immediately deported as a security risk.  The judge found that there might be grounds to overrule the Ministry of the Interior’s decision to deport him based on its claim that the reporter “failed to cooperate.”  One hopes the judge will also find reason to insist that the defendant also be present for the hearing.

*  *

Israeli judge Kobi Vardi, who is hearing the case filed by Palestinian news agency Maan, seeking to prevent the Israeli government from deporting American-Jewish editor Jared Malsin, asked for the defense to reply to the government’s filing.  Malsin is in his sixth day of detention at Ben Gurion Airport in a windowless room with nothing except a small suitcase.  Israel refuses to move him to a proper facility within Israel in order not to upgrade his legal status in the eyes of the court.

The attorney general filed papers defending the deportation order with the judge, who could have immediately ruled in the government’s favor.  Instead, he asked for the defense to reply, which allows Malsin’s team to fight on another day.  The judge could ask for a full hearing and demand that the government produce Malsin as a witness in his own defense; or he could deport him.  If he does, Malsin has recourse to the Israeli Supreme Court, though he would continue to be detained till his case could be heard.

The claims against Malsin by the government, which I’ve outlined earlier, are a smokescreen.  They clearly want to punish English language media reporting that contravenes the government line.  They want to criminalize Palestinian media sources and muzzle them in any way they can.

Governments have great discretion when it comes to immigration issues.  They may admit or exclude anyone for pretty much any reason or none.  But one would hope that even a government as tone-deaf to civil liberties as this one might realize that deporting a reporter merely because his work has been a thorn in the side of the government doesn’t look good for the self-described Only Democracy in the Middle East™.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

‘Flying While Arab’: Israeli Airport Security Harrassment

Tuesday, August 7th, 2007

In March, 2007, after several embarrassing episodes in which Israeli security screeners harassed prominent Israeli Arabs (and an especially egregious example here) at Ben Gurion airport, the Shin Bet head announced with fanfare that the procedures would “soon change.” It’s only taken five months and lo and behold there is a new plan. Only problem is it doesn’t end discrimination or harassment at all; it merely disguises it:

Transportation Minister Shaul Mofaz announced Tuesday that Jewish and Arab citizens traveling abroad will receive the same color stickers for their luggage during security checks at the airport. Prior to the decision, security personnel at Ben Gurion Airport used different color stickers for each population sector, each color indicating a different security level. From now on, all citizens traveling abroad will receive a white sticker, indicating that they have already gone through the security check.

According to Transportation Ministry spokesman Avner Ovadia, the use of different color stickers left non-Jewish passengers feeling humiliated and discriminated against. The decision to use a single color for all citizens was made in an effort to bridge the gap between different sectors in Israel.

Ynet spoke to airport security personnel about the changes and learned that now instead of the colored stickers, luggage will be differentiated according to numbers displayed on the identical white stickers. Now everyone will have a white sticker – but Israeli Jews will receive a sticker labeled 1, Arab families and Israeli Arabs will receive a sticker labeled 2 and Arabs traveling alone a sticker labeled 5.

An airport screener said that the change was made for the benefit of the Arab public. “But it’s stupid; anyone who understands the process can see the different numbers for Jews and Arabs.”

To paraphase The Who: “Meet the new plan, same as the old plan.” If I were an Israeli Arab I’d be thinking along the lines of the character from Hester Street who says memorably: “They can’t piss on my back and make me think it’s rain.”

So we have Israeli Arabs enduring the degradation and humiliation of airport petty harassment. But now they are insulted even more provocatively by the supposed reform of a process which hasn’t been reformed at all. This is what happens in a national security state which takes the position that 20% of its citizenry are automatic security risks regardless of who they are or what they believe. I call it “flying while Arab.”

Here in the States we have a similar problem of racial profiling or “driving while Black.” Thankfully, many states have outlawed this procedure and demanded that law enforcement withdraw it from their repertoire. Unfortunately, in Israel ethnic discrimination against Arabs is embedded far deeper and interwoven with an even more noxious strand of national security threat. I should add there have been a number of incidents in which American Arab passengers have been ejected from flights in this country because of unfounded fears that they are security threats.

Apparently, the airport’s security director looks at Arab travelers and sees nothing but “happy, shiny people:”

Ben Gurion security director, Shmuel Zachai, said in response: “All the stickers in the airport are white and meant to improve the sense of equality. Ever since we implemented the change we’ve barely received any discrimination complaints.”

“Barely?” What does “barely” mean? And does the fact that Israeli Arab MKs are breathing down Diskin’s neck on this issue not constitute a “complaint?” Or would he like every Arab traveler pissed off at their treatment to take up a picket sign and stand outside his office. Would he then believe there was a problem? The only problem is those Arabs would know the Shin Bet would likely never let them fly again from Ben Gurion in retaliation.

Hat tip to Sol Salbe for another great story lead.

Israeli Supreme Court Justice’s Daughter Detained as Security Risk at Ben Gurion

Thursday, March 1st, 2007

There is a certain unfortunate myth among pro-Israel activists that Israel is one big happy democracy in which the Arab minority partakes of all the benefits equally with the majority Jewish population. The apologists will argue speciously about the higher standard of living Israeli Arabs enjoy compared to inhabitants of neighboring Arab countries. I say specious because the comparison should be to other Israelis and not to citizens of foreign countries. And if you compare the Israeli Arab standard of living to the general Israeli standard, the former is at the very bottom rung of society. Another argument is that Israeli Arabs vote and participate fully in Israeli democracy. While this is true, it ignores the fact that there is such a stigma among the Jewish-dominated political parties against cooperating with Israeli Arab parties that none will probably ever be brought into a coalition government. Which in turn weakens the political voice of the Arab minority.

But the issue at hand today is Israel’s outrageous airport security program at Ben Gurion which automatically labels ANY Israeli Arab traveler as a security risk. I’ve written here about the distinguished Hebrew University law professor who was ignominiously detained at the airport and prevented from attending an academic conference due to the humiliating security procedures. Hardline Israel bloggers pooh-poohed my charges of bias. I wonder how they’ll argue away this latest outrage reported by Ynetnews:

A Foreign Ministry cadet and the daughter of Supreme Court Justice Salem Jubran, Rania, was recently subjected to humiliating security inspections at the Ben Gurion and Barcelona Airports.

Jubran, 26, the first Israeli Arab ever to complete a Foreign Ministry cadet training course, was asked by security personnel at the airports to prove that her Ministry employee documents were authentic and that her father was indeed a Supreme Court justice.

Several days ago, Jubran sent an angry letter to Prime Minister Ehud Olmert, and on Wednesday Shin Bet head Yuval Diskin announced that the inspection procedures at airports will soon change.

The only silver lining in this story is that Israel apparently actually has some shame and feels compelled to reexamine its security procedures regarding Israeli Arabs. That being said, the Israeli security apparatus has a long history of appearing to respond to public outcry over incidents like this only to relapse into the same old bad treatment as soon as the furor dies down. So we’ll have to see whether anything really changes at Ben Gurion.

Here is what happened to Jubran at the airport:

Two weeks ago, Jubran arrived at Ben Gurion on her way to a vacation in Barcelona. The security guard at the airport ordered her to open her suitcase and tagged it with a yellow label indicating it was considered a high security risk.

“At this point,” Jubran described in her letter to the prime minister, “I asked to sort the matter out with the shift manager. Following my request, two shift managers appeared. I presented to them my Foreign Ministry employee certificate, but they ignored it and began repeating the questions I had already been asked before.”

“The inspection was carried out in a rude and disrespectful manner towards me personally, as an Israeli citizen, and more so as a Foreign Ministry employee,” she added.

Only after Jubran contacted the Foreign Ministry’s representative at the airport was she allowed to board her flight.

And lest you think the affair ended there, the same thing reoccurred on her return:

On her way back to Israel from Barcelona, Jubran was forced to undergo a similar experience. Her luggage was again labeled with a special “security risk” tag, a procedure reserved for most Israeli Arabs.

Jubran tried presenting the documents attesting that she was a Foreign Ministry cadet and the daughter of Justice Jubran, but this raised even more suspicion.

“The security guard started questioning me about the Foreign Ministry employee card and the Foreign Ministry’s location, as if I was a fraud,” she described.

When she was about to board the flight, Jubran was again told that she would not be allowed to get on the plane, and the matter was resolved only after she was found to be telling the truth.

I should make clear that I am all in favor of high level security procedures to maintain the security of Israeli citizens both within Israel and abroad. But I am absolutely opposed to racial profiling of all Israeli Arabs as security risks. This is just a lazy person’s way of doing security. You place all the onus on the particular Israeli Arab victim to prove them ARE NOT a risk, rather than putting the onus on the security apparatus to maintain profiles of those specific Israeli Arabs who may pose a real security risk. And I should add here that Israeli Arabs in general have proven just as loyal to the State of Israel as its Jewish citizens. So the idea that as a class they should be suspected of disloyalty or allegiance to a terror group is simply preposterous. All this does is fuel mistrust and suspicion among Israeli Jews of their fellow Arab citizens.

Let the Shin Bet actually do its job and find any Israeli Arab suspects out to harm Israel, rather than putting all Arabs into the box of being a potential terrorist.

Performance Optimization WordPress Plugins by W3 EDGE