Muslim and Jewish Women in Nazareth

'We can live in peace'...John Lennon (photo: Dafna Tal)

Mahzor

Mahzor

New York Public Library

Churches

Sarajevo Haggadah

Mah Nishtanah

Sarajevo haggadah

Antaea Darom

Israeli women's art

Action

Torah as music

Ben Heine

Action

ceramic bowl

Mohammad Said Kalash, "Offering Reconciliation" exhibit (photo: Ilan Amihai)

Action

Punch and Judy/Pinchas and Jamila

Avi Katz

Action

David Grossman

Ben Heine

Action

Eldrige Street shul

Lower East Side

Action

Dove

Ben Heine

Action

Two birds

Hoda Jamal

Action

Israeli and Palestinian boys

from documentary, Promises

Action

Cat in the Hat

Yiddish version

Action

Daylight through the Wall

Banksy: graffiti art on Separation Wall

Action

Maurice Sendak's Brundibar set

New Victory Theater (photo: Nan Melville/NYT)

Action

Daniel Barenboim, West-Eastern Divan Orchestra

Palestinian-Israeli musical ensemble (photo: Kerstin Joensson/AP)

Action

Great Day on Eldrige Street

N.Y.'s klezmer greats celebrate shul rededication (photo: Leo Sorel)

Action

Joint Appeal for Peace

(Avi Katz)

Joint Appeal for Peace

Ketubah, Ancona, Italy (1772)

(Jewish Theological Seminary library)

Ancona ketubah

Posts Tagged ‘Add new tag’

When Dan Pipes Gives Advice, Run as Fast as You Can the Other Way

Wednesday, February 3rd, 2010

Pipes' pipe dream of Iran war will save Obama presidency

Dan Pipes really really cares about Barack Obama.  The proof is in the helpful advice he proffered to “save” Obama’s presidency: bomb Iran.  In the blog world we call people like this “concern trolls,” people who offer advice out of faux concern for your reputation, but who really hate your guts.

As proof that the National Review must’ve had a very slow news and commentary day, they actually published this.  I’m not sure whether Pipes was drunk or on performance enhancing drugs when he wrote this fever dream of a column, How to Save the Obama Presidency: Bomb Iran:

[Obama] needs a dramatic gesture to change the public perception of him as a light-weight, bumbling ideologue, preferably in an arena where the stakes are high, where he can take charge, and where he can trump expectations.

Such an opportunity does exist: Obama can give orders for the U.S. military to destroy Iran’s nuclear-weapon capacity.

…By eliminating the Iranian nuclear threat, Obama protects the homeland and sends a message to American’s friends and enemies.

…If the U.S.limited its strike to taking out Iran’s nuclear facilities and did not attempt any regime change, it would require few “boots on the ground” and entail relatively few casualties, making an attack more politically palatable.

…Just as 9/11 caused voters to forget George W. Bush’s meandering early months, a strike on Iranian facilities would dispatch Obama’s feckless first year down the memory hole and transform the domestic political scene. It would sideline health care, prompt Republicans to work with Democrats, and make the netroots squeal, independents reconsider, and conservatives swoon.

Slim Pickens: Dan Pipes in a cowboy hat

Not a word here about the price the U.S. would have to pay for such monumental lunacy.  For the Pipes of the world there’s never a price, only the pipes dream of  what could be if only we had the courage of our convictions.  This is Donny Rumsfeld devoid of any practical responsibility for outcomes or results.  It’s as if Pipes plays out all these fantasies in a computer simulation divorced from reality as we know it.

Love that 9/11 line: so all a failing president (not so fast Dan, Obama may fool you yet) has to do is orchestrate his very own 9/11.  But of course an Obama 9/11 in Iran would be a real 9/11 for Iran in terms of the suffering it would cause.  And that would be followed by another 9/11 here brought about by Iran’s thirst for revenge.  Then we’d have 9/11’s all around.  This starts to remind me of Nero fiddling as Rome burned or Slim Pickens riding down that thermonuclear warhead as if it was a rodeo bronco in Dr. Strangelove.  This man is a ghoul.  Even his picture makes him look damn scary.

Thanks to the intrepid Matt Duss for digging up this nugget.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

‘We’re a Small Country With a Big Heart’ and Other Nauseating Bibiisms

Monday, January 18th, 2010

In the annals of Israeli self-promotion this may not be the worst, but perhaps the least of the worst: it’s BAD.  In fact nauseating.  One of my hasbarist commenters noted I should be ashamed because I focus on the triviality of settler violence when the people of Haiti are in peril.  He certainly didn’t expect me to publicize Israel’s sterling response to Haitian suffering, which he did in his comment.  No, not at all.

Now comes this from Ynetnews (h/t Rupa Shah):

…The prime minister said that “the moment the dimensions of the disaster became known, I instructed the immediate deployment of an aid delegation on behalf of the State of Israel, which has already reached the place.

“This includes supplies, medication, doctors, a field hospital, an x-ray machine and many other vital things.  This is the true heritage of the State of Israel and the Jewish people. This act joins similar action we have taken in the past in Mexico, Kenya, and Turkey. We may be a small country, but we are a country with a big heart. This is the expression of Jewish ethics and heritage – to help others.

He means, Israel helps others (cf. black people) when they are several thousand miles away and in danger of extinction.  When they’re Ethiopian children refused a place in kindergarten in Petah Tikva…not so much.  Or Darfuris desperate to flee civil war in their homeland–not so much (they’re expelled).  Or foreign workers abused by Israeli employers–not so much.

Anyone who observes the Israeli political elite in action knows they are tone deaf.  But this sure takes the cake for self-aggrandizement and moral puffery.

Akiva Eldar has it precisely right:

…The remarkable identification with the victims of the terrible tragedy in distant Haiti only underscores the indifference to the ongoing suffering of the people of Gaza. Only a little more than an hour’s drive from the offices of Israel’s major newspapers, 1.5 million people have been besieged on a desert island for two and a half years. Who cares that 80 percent of the men, women and children living in such proximity to us have fallen under the poverty line? How many Israelis know that half of all Gazans are dependent on charity, that Operation Cast Lead created hundreds of amputees, that raw sewage flows from the streets into the sea?

The Israeli newspaper reader knows about the baby pulled from the wreckage in Port-au-Prince. Few have heard about the infants who sleep in the ruins of their families’ homes in Gaza.

…A few days before Israeli physicians rushed to save the lives of injured Haitians, the authorities at the Erez checkpoint prevented 17 people from passing through in order to get to a Ramallah hospital for urgent corneal transplant surgery. Perhaps they voted for Hamas. At the same time that Israeli psychologists are treating Haiti’s orphans with devotion, Israeli inspectors are making sure no one is attempting to plant a doll, a notebook or a bar of chocolate in a container bringing essential goods into Gaza.

…Even the images of our excellent doctors in Haiti cannot blur our ugly face in the Strip.

I urge you to contribute to the American Jewish World Service Haiti Relief Fund (or any charity of your choice).  Unlike Bibi, AJWS does good work day in and day out in Haiti and elsewhere, and doesn’t do so for ulterior motives.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Jerusalem Museum of Tolerance in Disarray, Gehry Withdraws

Friday, January 15th, 2010

Protest against desecration of Muslim Mamilla cemetery by encroaching Museum of Tolerance construction (BBC)

Phil Weiss has some pretty good sources who last week caught the fact that the entire Museum of Tolerance Jerusalem website disappeared in a puff of smoke.  This led to a story in The Tablet which confirmed the news that internationally-famed architect, Frank Gehry had withdrawn from the project.  The first word from one of his partners was that the reason for the withdrawal was “politically sensitive,” which implied at least some grappling with the criticism against the project from Muslims and Jews alike, because it is currently sited on a historic West Jerusalem Muslim cemetery.

This explanation would have had some semblance of honor to it.  But Gehry, beholden to his big-wig Jewish patrons and clients, backtracked in a subsequent statement in which he pulled the legs out from under his own partner:

“Unfortunately, our staff and resources are committed to other projects around the globe, and thus I will not be able to participate in the redesign effort. Contrary to a published report quoting my partner Craig Webb, this parting has nothing whatsoever to do with perceived political sensitivities.”

Gehry's design in happier, more grandiose days

As a former professional fundraiser, I caught of whiff of failure when I wrote about the capital fundraising for the project last year.  Turned out I was right on the money:

I note that only $115-million of the overall $250-million cost has been raised so far.  Given my fundraising background, I find it odd that a major capital project would be begun without all, or almost all the money already pledged.  You can see that this is not the case by reviewing the Donor Opportunity page at the website.

In particular, there was one glaring missing $77-million lead gift from Gary Winnick (of Global Crossing and Drexel Burnham infamy) who helped Hier conceive the original project when it was named after the would-be donor.  When Winnick’s fortune went belly-up so did the gift.  Oddly, Hier didn’t abandon the project as he should have, probably out of a sense of Pharonic hubris/ Edifice Complex.

I can’t say whether Gehry finally caved to the nasty implications of the siting of his project.  If he did that would indicate he has some sort of spiritual sensitivity or conscience.  But I think it even more likely that given the Winnick disaster and last year’s economic implosion, which hit L.A.’s wealthy real estate developers (and most likely gift prospects) especially hard, Gehry and Hier just had to bow to the hard reality that they didn’t have the money for the project.

Now, the question becomes can Hier build this sucker at all.  My hope is that he can’t.  He’s claiming he plans to scale down the effort and cost.  Maybe yes, maybe no.  But given the bad luck of the project I can’t see the types of glittery philanthropic names necessary to put this thing together jumping at the chance to associate their names with it.

Peace Now released this statement calling for reason from the Wiesenthal folks, something apparently in short supply:

“Frank Gehry’s withdrawal from a project that brings strife and contention rather than tolerance to Jerusalem provides the Wiesenthal Center an opportunity to do what is right and cancel the project or find an alternative site. There is enough tension and conflict in Jerusalem without this Orwellian scheme,” said APN President and CEO Debra DeLee. “It’s time for the Wiesenthal Center to practice tolerance and not provoke Muslims in Jerusalem and the entire world,” DeLee said.

The ugly truth of this project is that Hier made a hash of it from the beginning–from the siting on a Muslim cemetery, to the mission which proclaimed tolerance while trampling on the sensitivities of Muslims, to the fundraising, to the economic climate working against it.  Further, how in God’s name can a right-wing Likudist rabbi who earns his living off the Anti-Semitism industry, attempt to approach the subject of religious tolerance in the Holy Land?  As my rabbi and teacher Elliot Dorff said so memorably, it is a Hillul Hashem (“desecration of God’s name”).

If Hier were sensible he would give the project a respectful burial somewhere outside the Mamilla Muslim cemetery.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Shin Bet Seeks Expulsion of American-Jewish Journalist Working for Palestinian News Agency

Friday, January 15th, 2010

Jared Malsin, American-Jewish journalist in Palestine threatened with expulsion (BBC)

The Only Democracy in the Middle East™ has struck again: the English editor for the independent Palestinian news agency Maan, American Jared Malsin, was detained along with his girlfriend at Ben Gurion airport on his return to Israel from a European vacation.  During the detention it became clear that the Shin Bet intended to expel him from Israel as a security risk.  It provided no justification whatsoever.  And when Malsin notified the U.S. embassy of his predicament and they called to inquire, security officials lied by claiming neither individual was in custody and that they were probably “enjoying a night on the town in Tel Aviv” and had simply forgotten to notify them.

Look, I understand this is garden variety harassment when it comes to Israel.  Palestinians are treated far worse.  Indeed, three Gaza journalists were killed during Cast Lead, one by an Israeli tank shell fired despite the victim being clearly marked as a journalist.  But what stands out here is the sheer effrontery of Israel’s Interior Ministry expelling a U.S. citizen and journalist from its shores merely for reporting inconvenient facts about Israel’s maintenance of the Occupation.  The security establishment doesn’t shrink from tangling with Israel’s most important ally nor from violating one of the most treasured traditions of western democracies: freedom of the press.

Maan quickly filed an injunction staying the expulsion order and the Israeli attorney general filed for the court to remove the stay.  Luckily, the Israeli district judge refused to lift the stay and Malsin will live to fight another day, but barely.  Unless there is a furious outcry both from inside and outside Israel chances are a judicial system inherently biased in favor of state power when it comes to security issues will likely acquiesce with the decision to expel the journalist.

Since he was arrested Tuesday, Malsin has been allowed only one 20 minute meeting with his lawyer and permitted contact with a single U.S. consular official.  His personal belongings have been put in herem and he is not allowed access to them (when Malsin first boarded the flight back to Israel in Prague, security agents confiscated his cell phone so he could not inform his employer or U.S. diplomats of his situation).

Lying scumbag PR flack Mark Regev labelled as “absurd” claims that the action comes in retaliation for Maan’s coverage of rather unpleasant events like the weekly Bilin anti-Wall protests at which several Palestinians and an American have been murdered or maimed with severe brain injuries.  But Israeli immigration officials seem not to have been on the same page:

…The official explanation offered by the country’s own immigration department cited news stories Malsin had authored “inside the Territories,” among them some which “criticized the State of Israel.”

The Interior Ministry makes the vague claim he was detained because he was ‘uncooperative’ during questioning:

An official report on the questioning, which Maan said it had received from the court, accused Mr Malsin of failing to arrange the correct visa, but did not give details.

It said he was suspected of “exploiting the fact that he is Jewish to gain a visa”.  This was apparently on the basis that, when seeking a visa extension previously, he had told Interior Ministry officials he was exploring the option of emigrating to Israel, but had written articles critical of the country.  By law Jews from around the world are eligible to emigrate to Israel.

The report also said Mr Malsin had refused to give the name of the friend he said he lived with in the West Bank.

This might have made Israeli officials even angrier:

…Mr Malsin, a graduate of Yale University, had initially come to Israel on the Birthright programme, which funds visits to Israel for young Jewish Americans.

Mr Malsin had never overstayed a visa, except for his most recent one, which was a few days overdue and that he had been told by officials this did not matter, Mr Hale said.

Whoa, biting the hand that feeds, Mr. Malsin.  You’re only allowed to come on a Birthright tour if you expect to make aliyah or return to the States to make Jewish-Zionist babies.  It’s simply bad form to take the free trip AND exploit the Law of Return in order to write nasty articles about Israel.  If he had only gone to work for Israel HaYom, he would’ve been welcomed with a ticker tape parade and given the keys to the kingdom or a settlement or two.

Maan even reports that some Israeli officials have expressed concern and opposition to the violation of press freedoms.

Several major press freedom NGOs have expressed support for Malsin:

The New York-based Committee to Protect Journalists, which monitors freedom of the press worldwide, urged Israel to refrain from taking punitive action against reporters over specific content in their work. “Israel cannot hide behind the pretext of security to sideline journalists who have done nothing more than maintain an editorial line that the authorities dislike,” the organization said.

The 2009 Reporters Without Borders Press Freedom Index ranks Israel 93rd (out of 175) behind other Middle Eastern countries like Kuwait, Lebanon and United Arab Emirates.  Press freedom in the Israeli Occupied Territories is ranked 150th.  Now we see a perfect example of why.

Malsin’s girlfriend, a Lutheran peace activist, has already been deported by Israel.  She, alas, was not a journalist and had no protections from Israel’s wrath.  And Israel didn’t even have to explain what sort of security risk she posed as a Christian adherent of non-violence.

H/t to Rupa Shah.

Comment is Free: Holding Israel Accountable for Gaza War Crimes

Monday, April 20th, 2009

The Guardian’s Comment is Free has just published a new piece I wrote about the burgeoning movement demanding  accountability for Israeli war crimes during the Gaza war.  I address the question of whether the international effort this time will be more successful than past stalled efforts that followed Israeli atrocities like the 2006 Lebanon war.  While I don’t have a definitive answer, I note that momentum is greater and specific efforts by human rights campaigners more organized than in the past.  I note increased interest in the Boycott, Divest, Sanctions movement even among American Jews.

There’s a pretty lively debate in the comment section to which I invite you.