Mahzor

New York Public Library

Churches

Sarajevo Haggadah

Mah Nishtanah

Sarajevo haggadah

Antaea Darom

Israeli women's art

Action

Torah as music

Ben Heine

Action

ceramic bowl

Mohammad Said Kalash, "Offering Reconciliation" exhibit (photo: Ilan Amihai)

Action

Punch and Judy/Pinchas and Jamila

Avi Katz

Action

David Grossman

Ben Heine

Action

Eldrige Street shul

Lower East Side

Action

Dove

Ben Heine

Action

Two birds

Hoda Jamal

Action

Israeli and Palestinian boys

from documentary, Promises

Action

Cat in the Hat

Yiddish version

Action

Daylight through the Wall

Banksy: graffiti art on Separation Wall

Action

Maurice Sendak's Brundibar set

New Victory Theater (photo: Nan Melville/NYT)

Action

Daniel Barenboim, West-Eastern Divan Orchestra

Palestinian-Israeli musical ensemble (photo: Kerstin Joensson/AP)

Action

Great Day on Eldrige Street

N.Y.'s klezmer greats celebrate shul rededication (photo: Leo Sorel)

Action

Joint Appeal for Peace

(Avi Katz)

Joint Appeal for Peace

Ketubah, Ancona, Italy (1772)

(Jewish Theological Seminary library)

Ancona ketubah

Anatomy of Settler Land Theft

December 20th, 2008

The AP has done us a tremendous journalistic service (easily deserving of Pulitzer consideration) with a probing investigation of one particular instance of settler fraud that involved stealing privately owned Palestinian land for the illegal outpost of Migron:

Israeli soldiers guard illegal outpost on stolen land (Getty Images)

Israeli soldiers guard illegal outpost on stolen land (Getty Images)

The transformation of a piece of West Bank land from a Palestinian field into a Jewish settlement has roots in an unlikely place – Orange County, California – and in a document that a [Palestinian landowner] supposedly signed more than four decades after the date of his death.

Unfolding from the West Bank’s terraced olive groves to a strip mall in a Los Angeles suburb, the story of this posthumous deal offers a rare glimpse into the underworld of straw companies and middlemen through which chunks of land move from Palestinian to Israeli hands. Each transaction further complicates an Israeli withdrawal that would be key to any peace agreement.

Such property deals are driven by the settlers’ belief the land is their God-given right; the cooperation of Israel’s governments…and cash from wealthy donors, many of them American Jews.

Here’s how the fraud unfolded:

…A 2004 document shows a Palestinian farmer named Abdel Latif Sumarin sold a plot long tended by his family near the village of Burqa, east of the city of Ramallah, to a company with an Arabic name. The paper contains Sumarin’s signature in clear English script and that of a California notary.

But an Associated Press investigation that made use of court papers, public records and interviews in the West Bank, Israel and the U.S., shows that the document is a poorly executed forgery.

Sumarin [n]ever visited America, his family says he couldn’t write English, and public records show he died in 1961. The notary in California says he did not sign the paper either.

Palestinian landowner prays at grave of grandfather who 'sold' land 40 years after his death (AP)

Palestinian landowner prays at grave of grandfather who 'sold' land 40 years after death (AP)

One of the ironies of this case is that the real Abdel Latif Sumarin, whose fraudulent signature graces a transfer deed, was buried in 1961 on a hilltop overlooking what has since become Migron.  If his spirit were there, he could see the very land that Jewish settlers have stolen from his family.

The fraudulent transaction actually occurred after the settlers had physically taken control of the land and created a settlement now containing 45 young families.  It appears the fraud was like a backdated check meant to “cover” the physical theft of the property from the Palestinian owners.  The six acres of stolen Palestinian land are caught up in two Israeli court cases and also under investigation by the FBI because several elements of the fraud transpired here in the U.S.

It is unfortunately common to find this type of land fraud in cases involving settlements:

Documents signed in strange places – and crooked deals – are not unusual in the lucrative and clandestine trade in Palestinian-owned land. Another recent challenge to a settler land deal in the town of Hebron involved forged documents, and a third revolved around Israeli businessmen who set up a notary with a prostitute, filmed their encounter, and then blackmailed the man into signing a sales document in Cyprus.

It is common these days to single out the Hilltop Youth for their violent extremism and repudiation of the secular State of Israel.  Journalists note that the new breed rejects the “go along to get along” passivity of their settler leader elders.  But in this case it is that very supposedly more moderate elder generation, embodied by Pinhas Wallerstein, which created and sanctioned this fraud.  And listen to the lies spill out of his mouth–lies from the mouth of a Torah-true Jew:

The El-Watan company [which allegedly "purchased" this land] was set up by an Israeli local government in the West Bank that was headed until recently by Pinhas Wallerstein, a prominent settler leader.

“The person who sold us the land was very much alive at the time, and living in the United States,” said Wallerstein, adding that the settlers had paid millions of dollars for the small plot. He said the document transferring ownership was genuine to the best of my knowledge.

“If anyone was guilty of fraud,” Wallerstein said, “it was the seller, who may have tricked the settlers into believing he was the Palestinian owner. He did not present evidence for that claim, which if true would mean the settlers spent millions without verifying the seller’s identity.”

The company has a photocopy of the seller’s California ID and a videotape of him, Wallerstein said. But he would not make them available to the AP, saying they would eventually be introduced as evidence in court.

One of the points I find especially laughable is Wallerstein’s attempt to blame the imaginary “seller” for the fraud.  His settler cronies devised this fraud and the so-called non-existent seller and now try to blame the chimera for the fraud.  Besides, the alleged “millions of dollars” which changed hands are also figments of Wallerstein’s imagination.

No doubt, to the settlers who devised this game it all appeared a clever charade.  They’d exploit Israel’s willingness to look the other way at such chicanery and put one over on the legitimate owners and get what they wanted to begin with, which was the land.  What they didn’t bargain for was a change in the political climate in which fraud involving acts in the U.S. might actually be taken more seriously by U.S. (and hopefully Israeli) authorities.

The piece de la resistance in the Ship of Fools comedy is this statement from a Migron resident which perfectly exemplifies not only the raging racism of the settlers, but the theological-mystical mania which fuels their delusional political attitudes.  Note that a historical event 1,000 years old trumps such petty niceties as property ownership and legal process:

Itay Harel, a social worker who lives on the Sumarin plot in Migron, insisted the sale was legitimate, although he refused to discuss it in detail. He also made clear that from the settlers’ perspective, the sale was beside the point.

“This land belongs to the people of Israel, who were driven off it by force,” Harel said, referring to the defeat and exile of the Jews by Rome in A.D. 70. He said no Palestinian had a rightful claim to any part of the West Bank.

“Anyone who claims the land is his is lying, and it is said that if you lie enough times, you start believing it,” he said.

This article perfectly encapsulates the potent toxic brew represented by the settler movement.  And as I said above, whether we’re talking about the most extreme Hilltop Youth or the supposedly more “responsible” older settler generation, everything in their enterprise is based on fraud and violence.  Once again, it is essential that U.S. authorities revoke the tax-deductible status of any Jewish organization which raises funds to support settlements.  It is also imperative that the FBI fully investigate potential criminal acts undertaken in support of settler conspiracies like the one outlined in this article.

Give Generously This Holiday Season: United Settlers of Pogrom, Inc.

December 19th, 2008

I saw this graphic accompanying a Kung Fu Jew post on Jewschool and laughed my kishkes off.  This is the kind of humor the Jewish left needs more of.  I especially liked “$1,000=1 full pogrom.”  I had to share it with you and hope you’ll find it even half as funny as I did. I’d challenge you to come up with some new gift levels like:

$180= 1 forged Palestinian property deed

$360=1 Molotov cocktail suitable for incinerating a Palestinian home

$720=1 Uzi suitable for shooting Palestinian donkeys and unarmed Hebron residents

$1,800=1 German shepherd attack dog

And if any of my settler supporter readers out there take offense, take it up in the comment thread.

Kung Fu Jew did me the favor of also linking to my own progressive Jewish tzedakah list.

Brass Crescent Awards Close Tonight

December 19th, 2008

If you haven’t already done so and are interested in supporting my nomination for Best Non-Muslim Blog in the Brass Crescent Awards, please consider doing so by clicking the linked image.  The awards site will also introduce you to a number of fascinating Muslim blogs you might not otherwise hear about.

UPDATE: It appears the nominations may’ve just closed.  If that’s the case, I apologize for the inconvenience.

Obama Transition Team Meets With Jewish Peace Groups: ‘Times They Are a Changin’

December 19th, 2008

There was a time when Administrations seeking to gauge the political temperature of the political community might call in a Steven Rosen, Malcolm Hoenlein, or Abe Foxman and feel confident that what they heard represented the communal consensus.  And invariably, the tune they sang was straight pro-Israel and slanted toward Likud.

Thank God, that’s no longer the case.  When Dan Shapiro, Obama’s Jewish liaison, decided the transition team should hear from the Jewish leadership, he included the usual suspects.  But it was also important to hear from J Street, Peace Now, Israel Policy Forum and Brit Tzedek (ZOA was also included and JTA’s Ron Kampeas gave him far too much copy as usual).  Some of these groups have never been so close to presidential power.  It’s practically unheard of, and confirms the new-found clout of Jewish peace groups.

One of my informants who knows a thing or two about such events claims the meeting was a relatively useless dog and pony show.  Getting representatives of 29 groups into one room guarantees almost nothing useful will be said or done.  While I certainly concede he is right, I still think it means that access to the White House will no longer be denied to the peace lobby.

Another Jewish editor pointed out to me an even more signifcant aspect of this meeting I wasn’t aware of: in the past, the Conference of Presidents was seen as the Jewish “umbrella” network under whose auspices these meetings always took place.  No longer.  The Conference had no part in the meeting except as one of the 29 invitees.  Consequently, Malcolm Hoenlein refused to attend due to “scheduling difficulties.” Could it be this might be Obama’s “payback” for Hoenlein’s attempt to foist Sarah Palin on the Jewish community as a major speaker at an anti-Iran rally outside the UN just before the election?

I understand Mort Klein had a full-fledged hissing and grunting attack about the enemies of Israel with whom he was sitting in the room.  He even complained the roster of invitees couldn’t possibly be balanced since the Obama people hadn’t invited one of his kissin’ cousin right wing groups, Americans for a Safe Israel.

I am hoping that a more moderate Administration Middle East approach translates into a more pragmatic legislative agenda regarding Israel relations and less bellicose proposals championed by Aipac’s supporters.

No one’s claiming that Aipac or other Israel lobby groups won’t be heard since they command powerful megaphones.  But they don’t own the PA system as they used to.  It’s a new day.

Madoff: ‘We Really Couldn’t Lose’

December 19th, 2008

Saddest quotation of the day:

In addition to wealthy clients, Madoff lured in more modest investors. Starting 32 years ago, on the advice of their accountant, Joan and Arnold Sinkin of Boynton Beach, Fla., began investing with Madoff. After they finished putting their kids through college, the Sinkins began to steadily add to their stake with Madoff, a few thousand dollars at a time, until he controlled most of their life savings.

“We were really what you call middle class,” said retired physical therapist Joan Sinkin, 75, in an interview with the Forward. “I felt lucky to be with them.”

Now, their savings are almost entirely gone, and they may be forced to sell their condo on Long Island. Yet even now, reflecting on her talks with Madoff, Joan Sinkin can’t quite believe what has happened.

“He explained the philosophy,” Sinkin said. “We really couldn’t lose.”

Long Island Orthodox Jewish Paper Defends Killing Muslims

December 18th, 2008

Once again let me say I find astonishing the near total silence of the organized Jewish community and media to Lawrence Kulak’s diatribe against Islam published in the Long Island Orthodox paper, Five Towns Jewish Times.  In his guest column, he claimed that if Islamists kill innocent non-Muslims that Muslim innocents should similarly be targeted for murder.  Essentially, an invitation to anti-Muslim mass murder:

“The only way to deal with Islamic terrorists is the same way in which they deal with their victims. Muslims believe in the literal interpretation of the Biblical doctrine of an eye for an eye…They killed our innocents, and unless we kill theirs, they will go on killing ours. The Torah, however, preaches a doctrine which…would finally put an end to all Islamic terror: if somebody is coming to kill you, rise up and kill him first.”

The fact that Kulak was diagnosed in 1991 with a bipolar disorder and hospitalized at a mental health facility never appears to have factored into the publisher’s editorial decision about publishing the piece.  Not only has the 20,000-circulation paper’s editor not distanced himself from the column (though he HAS strangely removed it from the website), he has gone on the counter-attack against the Muslim organization which first brought the world’s attention to Kulak’s hate speech, CAIR.

The Muslim defense organization has a lot of nerve pointing out the deficiencies of the Jewish paper’s editorial when CAIR won’t denounce every single terrorist act ever committed by a Muslim against anyone. It doesn’t matter than CAIR HAS in fact denounced Muslim terror. They haven’t denounced the particular Muslim terrorists who most exercise Gordon, Hamas and Islamic Jihad. So instead of taking responsibility for the hash he’s made of things, Gordon decides to blame the Muslim victim for his attack.

In my own post about this I wrote that Kulak’s piece was a meandering anti-Muslim rant.  If possible, Larry Gordon, the paper’s editor, wrote an even more lugubrious, non-responsive reply.  The most relevant passage is this one:

The editorial staff of the Five Towns Jewish Times decries the notion of any support of terrorism, and we fully support the United States government’s War on Terrorism. As an Orthodox Jewish weekly, the 5TJT also rejects the demonization of Muslims, both in this country and abroad. If any such implication of supporting the terrorization or murder of innocent Muslims who do not support terrorists or terrorist activities was made by an article in the 5TJT, it was due simply to a poor choice of words—a slip of the author’s pen, if you will. Read in its entirety, the article is clearly conveying the message that members of a community that supports terrorists and allows them to remain in its midst should not expect to escape retaliation.

For the editor, the fact that Kulak clearly advocating killing Muslim “innocents” is a mere “poor choice of words–a slip of the author’s pen.”  Somehow Gordon transmutes Kulak’s phrasing into a hardly less offensive locution that Muslim members of communities supporting terror deserve retaliation.  Kulak advocated western nations and Israel invading Pakistan to exterminate Muslim militants.  Gordon’s articulation would also justify such egregious violation of international law.  So what has his warped apologia gained?  Not much.

To make matters worse, the paper has published a defense Kulak wrote of his column in which he included this memorable contradiction of the passage I quoted above:

I never advocated the wanton killing of innocent Muslims…

Has he forgotten this passage?  “They killed our innocents, and unless we kill theirs, they will go on killing ours.”  I thought killing innocents was automatically “wanton” killing.  Or has somehow Islamist terror caused the killing of Muslim civilians to become acceptable?

The ADL, the ony Jewish group to respond in any way to this Jewish publishing outrage, published a generic objection that wasn’t even attributed to a staff person:

We were shocked by Lawrence Kulak’s suggestion that Jews should kill innocent Muslim civilians to counter Islamic terrorism.

Regardless of one’s views on terrorism, to even entertain the notion of responding in kind is morally reprehensible and appalling. It is unfair to hold innocent Muslims responsible for the radical views of an extreme minority.

In the Jewish tradition, words have consequences. In this case, Kulak’s words crossed the line.

“Crossed the line.” That’s as bothered as the organized Jewish community seems to be by Kulak’s Islamophobic hate.

I’m pleased to note as distinguished a theologian as University of Chicago professor Martin Marty has denounced the Five Towns diatribe in Sightings his weekly newsletter:

Kulak is unsentimental in his “kill them all” approach…The problem of making a principle of this…is that the…counter-belligerents who read this…editorial–and read them they do–find occasion to raise the price, engage in more indiscriminate violence, and that, in turn…impels us to raise it still higher and engage in ever more violence…We all know that in all wars, including those we call “just” or “good,” there are “collateral damages” and deaths of innocents. However, making a principle out of doing so, and especially doing so on religious grounds, only invites more violence. Then there are no eyes to trade for eyes, teeth to exact for teeth, while hatred and violence triumph.

If Martin Marty finds this important enough to write about why can’t Jewish organizations? Why can’t Abe Foxman actually sign his name to the ADL denunciation of this malarkey? Why can’t we Jews tell the world in no uncertain terms that the Kulaks and any Jewish paper that publishes him do not represent us in any way shape and form?

I note that Reb Kulak discovered my denunciation of his work and published his own diatribe here:

I would love to personally drive you and Marty into Gaza and then return several hours later to watch the vultures pick at the remains. (and later watch the vultures drop dead from ingesting poison)

That’s slightly less murderous than advocating mass killing of Muslim innocents, but not much.  Thanks to RM for the links and some background research for this post.

Support the Shministim

December 17th, 2008


A group of Israeli young people are refusing to serve in the IDF as a sign of their opposition to the Occupation. Some of them currently are serving jail sentences for honoring their convictions. Jewish Voice for Peace is campaigning on their behalf, seeking 30,000 signatures by tomorrow, December 18th, for a petition to be presented to defense minister Ehud Barak, asking that their status as conscientious objectors be recognized.

Omer Goldman, daughter of a retired senior Shin Bet officer, explains her act of resistance thus:

Why I am one of the Shministim:

“I believe in service to the society I am part of, and that is precisely why I refuse to take part in the war crimes committed by my country. Violence will not bring any kind of solution, and I shall not commit violence, come what may.”

I encourage my readers to sign the petition if you wish to support young, principled Israelis who are speaking truth to power.

When I was their age I was the first Jew ever to come before my local draft board as a conscientious objector. My application for CO status was approved. It’s not so easy for these young people, which is why we must stand behind them. Join Ed Asner, Ronnie Gilbert, Howard Zinn, Adrienne Rich and other prominent Jewish progressives in endorsing this campaign.

Rick Warren to Deliver Inauguration Invocation

December 17th, 2008

How do I hate this idea?  Let me count the ways:


1. Warren supported California’s Proposition 8 banning gay marriage.

2. He opposes abortion, terming it an “American holocaust.”

3. He opposes stem cell research.

4. Warren agreed with FOXNews’ Sean Hannity, who advocated “taking out” Iran’s president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.

I really do understand the strategy at work here and in general approve of it.  It’s a good thing to reach beyond the traditional Democratic base and embrace evangelicals.  Seeing evangelicals as our mortal enemies is not a good thing.  Where we have common interests we should make common cause.

But Obama is playing a dangerous game.  He’s figuring if I want to draw in evangelicals I’ll go to the big Kahuna.  If I can work with him then his followers will follow.  He figures that as president he will be able to subsume Warren and his followers within his own overarching political agenda.  But what happens if Obama’s charisma isn’t enough to keep the evangelicals in line, and he finds at some later date that he needs their vote in 2012 or he needs their legislative support?  What price will he be willing to pay then?  What’s he willing to jettison from his social agenda for the sake of keeping Rick Warren happy?

I would much rather Obama have chosen a more moderate evangelical to deliver his invocation.  There are such figures in the movement.  It is not all Pat Robertsons and Jerry Falwells.  By choosing someone with whom he had more in common politically he would’ve made his point about drawing in evangelicals, but wouldn’t have done such violence to his own political philosophy.

Obama apparently believes that inviting Rev. Joseph Lowery, one of Martin Luther King’s chief aides and former leader of the Southern Christian Leaership Conference, to deliver the benediction, he’s provided some political-religious balance.

I’d urge Obama not to forget American Muslims as well.  They were virtually invisible during the campaign and Obama ran away from them as fast as he could for obvious reasons.  But he shouldn’t have to do that now.  And using his middle name during the swearing in ceremony isn’t sufficient.

While everyone loves Yo Yo Ma and Itzhak Perlman, for political and creative reasons I would love to have seen Daniel Barenboim perform as well.  His support for Palestinian rights and status as an Israeli citizen would speak volumes without having to say a word.