Mahzor

New York Public Library

Churches

Sarajevo Haggadah

Mah Nishtanah

Sarajevo haggadah

Antaea Darom

Israeli women's art

Action

Torah as music

Ben Heine

Action

ceramic bowl

Mohammad Said Kalash, "Offering Reconciliation" exhibit (photo: Ilan Amihai)

Action

Punch and Judy/Pinchas and Jamila

Avi Katz

Action

David Grossman

Ben Heine

Action

Eldrige Street shul

Lower East Side

Action

Dove

Ben Heine

Action

Two birds

Hoda Jamal

Action

Israeli and Palestinian boys

from documentary, Promises

Action

Cat in the Hat

Yiddish version

Action

Daylight through the Wall

Banksy: graffiti art on Separation Wall

Action

Maurice Sendak's Brundibar set

New Victory Theater (photo: Nan Melville/NYT)

Action

Daniel Barenboim, West-Eastern Divan Orchestra

Palestinian-Israeli musical ensemble (photo: Kerstin Joensson/AP)

Action

Great Day on Eldrige Street

N.Y.'s klezmer greats celebrate shul rededication (photo: Leo Sorel)

Action

Joint Appeal for Peace

(Avi Katz)

Joint Appeal for Peace

Ketubah, Ancona, Italy (1772)

(Jewish Theological Seminary library)

Ancona ketubah

Archive for the ‘Outdoors’ Category

Burpee’s Act of Garden Vandalism: Heronswood is Gone

Tuesday, June 6th, 2006

mahonia gracilipes (photo: Heronswood.com)

For the gardeners among us, you may never buy another seed packet from Burpee’s after you read this travesty of a story. Six years ago, Burpee’s bought Dan Hinkley’s Heronswood Nursery. If you’ve never read, heard about or seen Heronswood I feel sorry for you. It was an oasis of the beautiful, rare and exotic plants from around the world which Dan dug up on his trips around the world. Hinkley is one of the great botanical adventurers of our time. He sought out regions of the world whose climate mirrored the Pacific Northwest and hiked into the backcountry to harvest specimens which he grew back home and sold to the public. In this way, he introduced American gardeners to some of the most extraordinary plants they’d ever see. A visit to Heronswood’s site was a feast for the eyes–filled with sumptuous colors and luxuriant forms.

I always loved Hinkley’s catalogues which he published yearly. They were filled with his charming, idiosyncratic prose. They purposely didn’t have any pictures (at least until Burpee got hold of it), just plant names (Latin only) and descriptions. Dan made you work hard. He didn’t give it to you on a silver platter. If you visited Heronswood, which I was privileged to do once before he sold it to Burpee, you wouldn’t find a single plant name in English–only Latin. If you weren’t botanically trained it made for some difficult shopping. But you had to respect the purity of his vision and I did.

George Ball-Burpee ceoGeorge Ball, chief Burpee vandal (photo: Harley Soltes / Seattle Times)

Then Dan sold his baby to Burpee’s with the promise that nothing would change. He’d continue to gallivant around the world looking for the most wonderful plants and his partner, Robert Jones would manage the business end. But it didn’t work out for Burpee’s. A nursery which Dan and Robert had managed successfully for years before they sold it to Burpee’s somehow didn’t churn enough cash for the corporate maw. Security guards came early on May 31st and took possession of Heronswood from Dan and Robert. The wonderful Heronswood that we knew and loved is no more (this from the Seattle Times):

For the founders of Heronswood as well as the thousands of gardeners who visited the lush nursery over the years, the news was devastating.

“This has been like dealing with a death in the family,” said Daniel J. Hinkley, who began Heronswood with his partner Robert Jones nearly 20 years ago. “We’re sad because we believed in Heronswood and believed it was more than just a nursery. We were trying to contribute to the horticultural community and the community as a whole.”

…”This is a disaster,” Richard Hartlage, a prominent landscape architect said. “Everyone is just shocked.”

George Ball is a cultural vandal just as surely as those who tore down the old Pennsylvania Station in New York City in 1966 and consigned the stone facade of the McKim Mead and White landmark to the New Jersey Meadowlands (where a preservationist found them years later neck deep in swamp). One could compare this to the burning of the ancient library at Alexandria, the largest then existing library in the world. OK, maybe I’m exaggerating. But don’t believe me, let Dan tell it:

“One thing I want to tell the people at Burpees is that the garden is filled with some extraordinarily rare things, and I hope that whoever acquires it values it.”

Do you think George Ball is listening or gives a shit??

Burpee’s is slime as a company. Their Neanderthal president, George Ball, wrote a heinous Op-Ed column/advertisement (link to my blog post which links, in turn to the column) in the New York Times a few months ago in which he attacked the Native Plant movement as ‘plant elitists.’ If you love plants, gardens and natives as many of us do, reading that column makes your blood boil. And if this post doesn’t turn you off Burpee’s for good, then reading that column will surely do the job.

Ball’s comment in the Seattle PI are unintentionally damning:

“But we’re not closing it, we’re just moving it,” he said.

Right, just moving it to Pennsylvania; or else moving it online. What about the physical Heronswood we all know and love from its Whidbey Island paradise?

Oh and in case you didn’t know, Mr. Ball seems to be under the mistaken impression that gardeners only live on the east coast:

When we purchased this six years ago,” he said, “we were anxious to make it a profitable company that would be fulfilling our ambition to serve a national audience of gardeners, which is predominantly on the East Coast. For six years we worked away at it. But finally we decided the best thing would be that we relocate.”

Makes lots of sense to me. You buy one of the world’s most prominent nurseries located on the WEST COAST when you all along believe the “national audience” for gardening is on the east coast. Is he a lunkhead or just a Vandal or both?

And in this interview from the North Kitsap Herald, Ball appears geographically-challenged reminding me of the subject of a Stephen Colbert interview:

“This will be the best of both worlds,” Ball said. “We’re not moving away from the Pacific Northwest, we’re moving to Pennsylvania.”

Huh??

And how about clueless:

Ball said he and Burpee worked hard to provide a good severance package for the employees and wishes nothing but the best for them. He also said they didn’t seem too upset by the news….

“I’m still angry,” [Heronswood employee Connie] Lammers said. “I was in shock when I first heard about it. Working there was more than business or a job. The employees were like extended family.”

There’s more:

“The plants we’ve collected from around the world will be tested under conditions more similar to those of our customers,” he said.

You see, there are no Burpee customers on the west coast; or if there are Ball sure doesn’t give a damn about ‘em. To which I say let’s give ‘em hell and make sure they have no customers not just on the west coast but in other places which don’t care for nursery vandalism (see last paragraph).

Though Dan has a five year non-compete clause with Burpee’s, I hope he’ll begin planning now for a new nursery venture. Dan, don’t let Burpee’s have the last word in this matter. Don’t let Burpee’s commit an act of nursery vandalism by dismantling the treasure that was Heronswood. We need you to act as a counter to the Burpee’s of the gardening world.

Another aspect of Burpee’s corporate philosophy which I detest is that they’re not content to just sell plants. They want to own the plants and their DNA.

I propose that gardeners and native plant lovers organize a national boycott of Burpee’s. What’s more, we should pressure our favorite nursery retailers to join the boycott by refusing to stock Burpee’s products. I know they’re the biggest seed sellers in the world, but who needs ‘em. There aren’t other seeds for sale from other companies? Companies which don’t ride roughshod over the botanical heritage of the Pacific Northwest.

Trillium Ovatum: Northwest Native Blooms

Wednesday, May 10th, 2006
trillium ovatumTrillium ovatum in my garden

The trillium ovatums have finished blooming in nearby Madrona Woods. That’s one of the signs that spring has firmly taken hold and the bonds of winter are broken. Unfortunately, local development has driven the trillium habitat far back into the Cascades and you rarely see it within the city. It’s a delicate plant to grow from seed. But once it takes hold it knows how to hold its own. One local neighbor has made it a project to grow seedlings every year and distribute them to folks who’ll try to bring it back in their home gardens.

Unfortunately, I didn’t have much success growing it from seedlings. But I did succeed with these plants which I bought at Florabundance, the wonderful annual Washington Park Arboretum plant sale. After two years of cultivation in my garden they are starting to propagate themselves nicely and I should get a nice patch of trillium each year.

When I first saw this plant while hiking in the Cascades I was confused by seeing what seemed like two varieties, one with a white flower and one with a pinkish one. In fact, when it first blooms the flower is white and as it ages it gains pink-purple blotches. Trillium ovatum is one of the truly lovely Northwest natives.

Israel Arrests, Frees Palestinian Minister: What the Hell is Going On?

Thursday, April 6th, 2006

Ariga has it right when it writes about yesterday’s detention of Hamas minister for Jerusalem affairs, Khaled Abu Arafa at an East Jerusalem road block set up by Israel’s Border Police (an outfit notorious for their brutal hooligan-like treatment of Palestinians):

Whether it’s lack of unified policy, the interregnum between the outgoing government and the new government, or the left and right hands not quite sure of what the other is doing, today was full of events that showed just how complicated the situation is for Israel — and the Palestinians.

I’d go even farther and say it shows how completely disorganized the intelligence services are. Is their current mission to be at war with Hamas; or to be conciliatory toward a potential future negotiating partner? I’d suggest that until Ehud Olmert gets his house in order and establishes his government these types of things will go on. And they may go on even after with such disparate, even warring political attitudes in his cabinet (Peretz and Lieberman to name but one example).

If one considers that Abu Arafa isn’t even a Hamas member, but an independent member of the Legislative Council, the Border Police action makes even less sense. Unless that is, the Israelis are sending a message to independents who’ve agreed to serve in the Hamas dominated cabinet that they will be special targets for harassment. Israel may view the discouragement of independent support for Hamas among Palestinians as yet another way to weaken Hamas’ government. If any of this is true, it is deeply discouraging and shows that Israel really is in the midst of a cold war with Hamas even though there is a de facto truce going on by which Hamas has maintained the peace among its own militants and Israel has stopped killing the former. We all know how short the path can be from cold war to hot especially in the Middle East.

What a nice way to arrest a duly appointed member of a sovereign (well, almost sovereign) government (this from Haaretz):

“They stopped the car and asked the minister to get out and when he refused they forced him by pointing the rifle in his face,” a Hamas source said…

Ahmed Jalajel, a photographer for the Arabic Al-Quds daily, was in the car with the minister when he was taken into custody.

“They asked us for ID, they said ‘get out.’ He [Abu Arafa] said ‘I am not getting out.’ They opened the car and pushed him out,” Jalajel told The Associated Press.

“They asked him to sit down on the ground, and then they checked the IDs. They asked him to get into their jeep. He refused, then they pushed him into the jeep,” Jalajel said, adding that he tried to take a picture but the security forces broke his camera.

Here’s how the Israelis tried to explain its action:

Israeli security sources confirmed the arrest, saying Abu Arafa, a resident of the East Jerusalem village of Abu Dis, was detained for trying to enter the Palestinian territories with his Israeli ID card. He was released a few hours later.

Israelis are banned from entering the West Bank and Gaza Strip.

By “Israelis,” the writer means to say basically stateless East Jerusalem Arabs whose land is annexed to Israel but who enjoy no particular Israeli legal status. So this fellow can be a Palestinian (sort of) but he can’t serve in the Palestinian cabinet since he’s not allowed to enter legitimate Palestinian territory to exercise the functions of his office. Nice going, you Israeli intelligence wizes!

All this comes on the heels of a reported moderation in Israel’s policies toward Hamas:

The move came days after Israel released from detention five senior Hamas officials — three of whom were appointed ministers in the new government, two others MPs in the newly elected Palestinian Legislative Council. And it came barely two hours after Israel Radio authoritatively reported that despite an announced Israeli policy aimed at preventing Hamas politicians from moving freely through the territories, Israel is in fact allowing Hamas politicians from the West Bank to move freely through the territory, including to sessions of the Palestinian Legislative Council and government sessions. The three freed Hamas ministers are Education Minister (and deputy premier) Nasser al Shaer, Finance Minister Omar Abdel Razeq, and Local Government Minister Issa al Jaabari. The other two Hamas leaders are parliamentarians.

So which is it, Mr. Olmert? Are you at war or are you reaching out (in even a limited way) to the Palestinians? Because you continue such a confused approach at your peril.

Burpee’s War on Native Plants

Tuesday, March 21st, 2006


The NY Times today published a distressing ode to invasive plants in Border War, a column penned by George Ball, “president of the seed and plant company W. Atlee Burpee & Company” as the Times author credit notes. I was under the impression that Martha Stewart owns Burpee, but I haven’t been able to confirm that online. But for those of you in the Pacific NW I know for a fact and must sadly say that one of our finest nurseries, Dan Hinckley’s Heronswood, is also owned by horticultural pirate. I can’t help but wonder how Hinckley, one of the word’s great nurserymen and an intrepid plant explorer, makes of this column.

trillium ovatumPacific NW native, trillium ovatum, does battle with invasives (photo: NWPlants.com)

What I particularly object to is that an executive of one of the world’s largest agricultural seed companies was given prime NYT real estate to argue that his products (the non-native, hybridized and denatured seeds used by agriculture, both big–massive industrial farms–and small–suburban homeowners) are cool for the environment. The Times should be ashamed. Where is the column by a director or board member of the thousands of organizations in this country which support native plants?

Before I get farther on in this discussion, I should stop to explain that “exotic” plants (also called invasive, noxious or pest) are plants which arrive from other places and take root in our local landscape. Many times (though not always) such plants have aggressive growth habits and overwhelm more delicate native species. Speaking of which, native plants are those which have grown in your region for centuries during which they’ve adjusted themselves to climate, terrain, pests, and diseases. These plants have found a balance with nature which many exotics have not yet done. For this reason, many horticulturists prize native plants.

Back to shilling for big bucks…here’s how Ball dishonestly sets up the premise of his argument:

THE horticultural world is having its own debate over immigration, with some environmentalists warning about the dangers of so-called exotic plants from other countries and continents “invading” American gardens. These botanical xenophobes say that a pristine natural state exists in our yards and that to disturb it is both sinful and calamitous. In their view, exotic plants will swallow your garden, your neighbors’ gardens and your neighbors’ neighbors’ gardens until the ecosystem collapses under their rampant suffocating growth.

If anything suffocates us, though, it will be the environmentalists’ narrowmindedness. Like all utopian visions, their dream beckons us into a perfect and rational natural world where nothing ever changes — a world that never existed and never will.

Himalayan blackberry thicketHimalayan blackberry thicket–imagine tearing that out with your own hands, Mr. Ball (photo: Invasive Species Initiative)

“Botanical xenophobes”–very catchy. Must’ve been written for him by some sharp publicist. But champions of native plants are not “xenophobes.” They do not hate all exotics, but only those which destroy native habitat. Here in the Pacific NW we are overrun by English laurel, Himalayan blackberries, and English ivy among others. These plants aren’t mere annoyances. They actually overwhelm a landscape and force all native species to the margins. That’s one sure recipe for the potential eventual extinction of some of our finest plants. Ball promotes another lie when he says environmentalists dream of a “perfect and rational world where nothing ever changes.” One thing anyone who studies Nature comes to learn is what Edmund Spencer noted in his Faerie Queene, mutatis mutandis, everything changes within it and does so constantly.

In this passage Ball seems to be deliberately playing an neocon idelogical card in calling native plant exponents “radical fundamentalists,” another preposterous statement. But I find it instructive that Ball seems to be aligning his argument with political conservativsm. If you think about what’s between the lines of this article, Burpee and other seed conglomerates are under attack around the world from small farmers who believe its seed choices are destroying the diversity of seed stock developed over thousands of years of natural selection. As Sustainable Table notes:

A few huge companies now produce much of the seed used by farmers; in 1999, the 10 largest seed companies controlled about 31% of the global seed market. These companies typically sell only the widely-used industrial varieties of plant seeds. This makes it increasingly difficult for farmers to buy non-industrial seed varieties and thus contributes to the disappearance of traditional plant varieties.

And this Purdue University Center for New Crops and Plant Products site puts the argument even more strongly:

The loss of biodiversity threatens global food security, especially for the poor, who rely on biodiversity for 85 to 90% of their livelihood needs.

[An alarming] trend I’d like to mention is privatization of plant breeding and seed sales. The first half of 1998 witnessed a dramatic consolidation of power over plant genetic resources worldwide, a trend that began over three decades ago. The global seed trade is now dominated by “life industry” corporations whose vast economic power has effectively marginalized the role of public sector plant breeding and research. Of course, the consolidation trend is not just in seeds but in all sectors of the life industry.

* 20 years ago there were thousands of seed companies, most of which were small and family owned. Today, the top 10 global seed companies control 30% of the $23 billion commercial seed trade.

Not to mention that native plant lovers are turning away from Burpee’s unimaginative plant selections and returing in droves to the plant choices that have worked best in local landscapes over millenia–native varieties.

Burpee can’t like any of this. It hits them where they live– in the pocket book. Hence, Ball’s mini temper tantrum in the Times’ Op-Ed section.

Here’s more specious argument:

The anti-exotics argue that gardens should be populated exclusively by native plants, as if the exotics were trying to enter the flower bed illegally.

What is it with this immigration trope?? Anyway, I’m not aware of “anti-exotics” who argue gardens should be populated exclusively by natives. Seems to me, the author is trying to set up a strawman who’ll fall over at the mere breath of his counter-argument. Horticulturalists, as far as I can tell, argue that we should return to natives and feature them prominently. But I know of few who argue against exotics, period. That seems extreme to me, which is why I doubt there is such a person except in Ball’s fervid imagination. I’ve had a garden here in Seattle since 1998. When I first planned it I told the landscape designer I worked with that I wanted to have as many native plants as I could while still featuring those exotics which I liked. I believe in a mix of the two with the native plants deserving pride of place for their long-lasting existence among us in this place.

[Denying exotics a place in our gardens] would compare with the denial of human immigration on grounds that certain ethnic groups breed in numbers “too prolific” for the existing elite to tolerate. Imagine, then, a horticultural ruling class. No “invasives” need apply: let the lily find another valley. Such prohibitions of exotic plant species demonstrate only an elitist snobbery that is as dangerous to a free society as it is to a free botany.

What horse crap! This is why the immigration trope is so idiotic yet so desirable for Ball. Using it, he can bring up to specter of racism calling native plant lovers racist and elitist for choosing natives over exotics. Ball’s argument is pathetic. Exotics actually DO crowd out natives and bring some species to the edge of extinction (at least in their local habitats, if not universally). Again, I’m aware of no horticulturalist (and Ball doesn’t provide any examples either) who’s advocated a “prohibition” against exotics. That would seem preposterous and impossible to enforce. Natives are not an elite, they are just common sense. In gardening, you generally go with what works in your environment. Natives work because they’ve been tried and tested over centuries, if not millenia.

Another fallacy of Ball’s argument:

No one, and certainly no gardener, grows truly destructive invasive plants in his garden.

Not true. There are many exotics grown in gardens by unsuspecting folk who do not realize the danger if those same plants are let loose in native habitats like forests which might lie right across the street. Not to mention that one of the hallmarks of exotics is that they hitchhike everywhere and easily establish toeholds in places like gardens even when the owner doesn’t want them there.

Aside from requiring a bit of weeding, exotics are safe as milk, unless one considers gardening a chore rather than a passionate hobby.


Reading this made me realize I need to invite Ball to join my neighbors in Friends of Madrona Woods who’ve spent seven years tearing out ivy, holly and Himalayan blackberry from the hillsides of this lovely urban park (and we’re nowhere near done yet). We have work parties every month. If Ball thinks exotics are charming little creatures who deserve our tender mercies and consideration, I don’t think he’d feel the same way after tearing out ivy vines for a few hours on our hillsides.

Friends of Madrona Woods is a Seattle environmental group devoted to restoring a local city park to a native habitat. We plan the first Seattle “daylighting” of an urban stream from source to Lake this summer. To learn more about how the native vs. exotic debate plays out in our little patch of woods visit our site.

Jonah: “I Want to Bring a Cloud Home”

Saturday, March 18th, 2006
thoughtful boyThoughtful Jonah

My son Jonah turns 5 tomorrow and we’re throwing a party for all his preschool mates on Sunday.

Lately, Seattle has been having more than its share of spring storms with lots of impressive cloud formations over the Cascade range which we view from our upper deck. Invariably, he’ll point to clouds and ask me “do you think they’re beautiful” to which I always reply: “yes they are.” Then he’ll ask me to “take a picture” (he’s really gotten into cameras–that’s one of the things we’re getting him for his birthday).

Cascades winter sunsetCascades, winter sunset

Today, Jonah showed me heavy cloud cover just north of Snoqualmie Pass. But this time he said something new and utterly charming: “Dad, how do you get to the clouds?” To which I replied: “You have to go into the mountains.” He then said: “I want to bring a cloud home.” I replied: “Well, that’d be hard to do since clouds are made out of water. What do you think, you can put it in your pocket and carry it home?” He laughed at my joke and guffawed, “Noooo!”

Then he said: “When I bring the cloud home it’ll be too big for our house and we’ll have to make a bigger house.”

Ya just gotta love ‘em!

Madrona Park Creek Restoration, October 13th Public Hearing

Wednesday, October 5th, 2005


Friends of Madrona Woods (of which I am a board member) is a Seattle neighborhood environmental group which has “adopted” Madrona Woods (bordering 38th Avenue and Lake Washington Blvd). After doing much forest restoration by rebuilding trails and stairways, removing invasive and exotic plants (holly, ivy, etc.) and replacing it with native plants, FOMW has taken on the ambitious goal of restoring Madrona Park Creek. In the early 20th century, this stream once ran above ground from the 38th Avenue ravine all the way down to Lake Washington. Now it runs underground in pipes. As I said it’s a big (at least for a small neighborhood group like ours), expensive project which requires much planning, permitting, and approvals from city agencies.

The Seattle Parks Department decided to schedule a public hearing about the stream restoration project on Thursday, October 13th at 6 PM at Park headquarters, 100 Dexter Avenue N. If you support our project, I hope you’ll try to attend. Or alternatively, you may supply written testimony by e-mailing Sandy Brooks.

If you’d like to donate to the project (such donations are gratefully appreciated), send it to Friends of Madrona Woods c/o J. Scott, 3700 East Marion Street, Seattle, WA 98122. Please make your check payable to Madrona Community Council. Gifts are tax-deductible.

PROJECT LOCATION:

853 Lake Washington Blvd

BUDGET:

This creek daylighting project will cost approximately $450,000 and is being funded by grants and private donations.

SCHEDULE:

Phase I (the ravine) and II (the shoreline) are scheduled to begin construction in summer 2006.

PROJECT DESCRIPTION:

Proposed Project:

This community-initiated project would take Madrona Creek out of pipes and run the water on the surface in a new creek bed. The sloping lawn area between Lake Washington Boulevard and Lake Washington would be replaced with native plantings. The project includes:

  • Restoration of a creek channel where water is currently piped, from above 38th Ave down to the Lake Washington shoreline.
  • Construction of an observation deck at the creek’s headwaters in the 38th Ave ravine.
  • Modification of the land between Lake Washington Blvd. S and the shoreline. A 4,800-square-foot wetland cove would replace a small portion of existing lawn area (the northern section near the bus turnaround).
  • Installation of new creek culverts under 38th Ave., Lake Washington Blvd., and the path through which fish could pass.
  • A crushed rock pedestrian trail along the lakeshore and around the wetland cove.
  • Four new creek crossing bridges, one below the boulevard and three in the ravine.
  • Re-vegetation of approximately 1.5 acres of existing park with native plants, including in the ravine and along the lakeshore.
  • Maintenance of views to the lake in three key view corridors through plantings three to four feet in height.

Anticipated Impacts:

Park access will be limited at times during construction and there will be truck traffic, equipment noise, and traffic modifications during construction.

If you have any questions about the project or this post please add a comment or send me an e mail via this blog. Friends of Madrona Woods will have a new website built very soon.

Lake Union Festival of Wooden Boats

Sunday, July 24th, 2005

Lake Union Wooden Boat FestivalI don’t know how it’s possible that I’ve lived in Seattle for seven years and I’ve never attended the Lake Union Wooden Boat Festival sponsored by the
Center for Wooden Boats. 15,000 Seattleites and tourists descend on the South Lake Union docks for a wonderful display of vintage wooden boats including everything from kayaks and canoes to family yachts. The festival earlier this month was blessed with beautiful warm weather and my wife suggested I take our four year-old, Jonah, who loves anything with engines (airplanes, trains, fire trucks, boats, etc.). Naturally, Jonah wanted to step foot in every single boat that was moored dockside which would’ve added up to ten or more. With all the ducking and high-stepping necessary to board and disembark from these beautiful vessels, daddy was quickly getting tired of it. I managed to bring Jonah over the the music (quite good) and the Seattle vintage vessels like a tugboat.

I love keeping great old crafts alive and the love and perfection achieved in building wooden boats deserves preservation. My only fear is that with the dramatic facelift Paul Allen is bringing to Lake Union will there still be room for a quaint old festival like this one in the Lake Union’s gentrified future?

Here are some photographs I took that day:

boat shell
kayak kayak prow
canoe shells pipe valve--Seattle seaport
Miss Budweiser power boat Argonaut II



Internet Archive: Archiving the Web Past

Saturday, July 16th, 2005

In a recent New York Times article, I learned of the fascinating mission of the Internet Archive: to maintain an archive of all internet web pages and websites which have ever existed (or at least since 1996). The article described a lawsuit by a company against the Archive claiming that the latter had no right to display its [the company's] defunct website among its [Internet Archive] archived pages. The company sued the archive for violation of copyright. The company’s case appears to me (an untutored law layperson) to be howlingly weak.Internet Archive's Wayback Machine

But what really piqued my interest in the Archive and it’s cooly-named Wayback Machine, was a problem that Friends of Madrona Woods had been having in retrieving its defunct website from the site’s host. For months, I’d heard of the impossibility of ever gaining access to the old site. Apparently, the person who created it forgot to renew the domain registration and hosting fees. He also forgot his username and password data and so lost access to everything pertinent to the site.

A bell went off in my head when I heard about the Archive: maybe our old site was archived there as well? Damned if I wasn’t right. While I didn’t know the specific URL for the old site, I tinkered a bit and did a search and sure enough in a few seconds I found our site in all its former glory. Now we can retrieve the site copy, images, maps and navigation structure for use in our new site. I’m simply amazed that what had appeared a hopelessly intractable problem (getting access to our site) was solved in a mere matter of seconds through the miracle of the Archive.

And to think some stupid company would like to put this wonderful research tool out of business for the purpose of some ridiculous lawsuit!