Mahzor

New York Public Library

Churches

Sarajevo Haggadah

Mah Nishtanah

Sarajevo haggadah

Antaea Darom

Israeli women's art

Action

Torah as music

Ben Heine

Action

ceramic bowl

Mohammad Said Kalash, "Offering Reconciliation" exhibit (photo: Ilan Amihai)

Action

Punch and Judy/Pinchas and Jamila

Avi Katz

Action

David Grossman

Ben Heine

Action

Eldrige Street shul

Lower East Side

Action

Dove

Ben Heine

Action

Two birds

Hoda Jamal

Action

Israeli and Palestinian boys

from documentary, Promises

Action

Cat in the Hat

Yiddish version

Action

Daylight through the Wall

Banksy: graffiti art on Separation Wall

Action

Maurice Sendak's Brundibar set

New Victory Theater (photo: Nan Melville/NYT)

Action

Daniel Barenboim, West-Eastern Divan Orchestra

Palestinian-Israeli musical ensemble (photo: Kerstin Joensson/AP)

Action

Great Day on Eldrige Street

N.Y.'s klezmer greats celebrate shul rededication (photo: Leo Sorel)

Action

Joint Appeal for Peace

(Avi Katz)

Joint Appeal for Peace

Ketubah, Ancona, Italy (1772)

(Jewish Theological Seminary library)

Ancona ketubah

Archive for the ‘Hudson River Valley’ Category

Rise of Radical Settler Movement

Friday, September 26th, 2008

Well, it only took the N.Y. TImes a whole week to acknowledge that settler assassins attempted to murder one of Israel’s most distinguished academic figures and winner of this year’s Israel Prize.  Better late than never.  But even in covering the story the reporter seems to minimize its significance:

…[It] created only a minor stir in a nation that routinely experiences violence on a much larger scale.

Another example of the sterling editorial choices made by the Times new correspondent, Ethan Bronner.  What could’ve induced Bronner to cover the bombing in a more timely fashion?  Should Zeev Sternhell have been killed to warrant coverage?  Another serious deficiency in the story was no background on Sternhell’s politics and why he would be a target for the crazies.

After getting that off my chest, let me add that Isabel Kershner, who wrote the story, actually penned a very telling and chilling piece about the rise of a new, even more violent and ideologically extreme settler youth movement in the Territories.  Those of us who go back far enough always thought the Yesha Council and the racist leaders it spawned were the devils of Israeli politics.  Who’d have thought that it could be worse?  That the next generation could be even more homicidal?

…The bombing may be the latest sign that elements of Israel’s settler movement are resorting to extremist tactics to protect their homes in the occupied West Bank against not only Palestinians, but also Jews who some settlers argue are betraying them. Radical settlers say they are determined to show that their settlements and outposts cannot be dismantled, either by law or by force.

Now…the militants seem to have spawned a broader, more defined strategy of resistance designed to intimidate the state.

This aggressive doctrine, according to Akiva HaCohen, 24, who is considered to be one of its architects, calls on settlers and their supporters to respond “whenever, wherever and however” they wish to any attempt by the Israeli Army or the police to lay a finger on property in illegally built outposts scheduled by the government for removal. In settler circles the policy is called “price tag” or “mutual concern.”

Besides exacting a price for army and police actions, the policy also encourages settlers to avenge Palestinian acts of violence by taking the law into their own hands — an approach that has the potential to set the tinderbox of the West Bank ablaze.

Hard-core right-wing settlers have responded to limited army operations in recent weeks by blocking roads, rioting spontaneously, throwing stones at Palestinian vehicles and burning Palestinian orchards and fields all over the West Bank, a territory that Israel has occupied since 1967.

…In Jewish settlements like Yitzhar, an extremist bastion on the hilltops commanding the Palestinian city of Nablus…a local war is already being waged. One Saturday in mid-September…scores of men from Yitzhar rampaged through the Palestinian village, hurling rocks and firing guns, in what the prime minister of Israel, Ehud Olmert, described as a “pogrom.” Several Palestinians were hospitalized with gunshot wounds.

“To us, deterrence is more important than catching the specific terrorist. We’re fighting against a nation,” Mr. Ben Shochat said.

…Those on the extremist fringe — like Mr. Ben Shochat, who belong to the so-called hilltop youth — are increasingly rejecting any allegiance to the state

I was quite shocked by a N.Y. Times reporter actually using the settler name for part of the West Bank:

In Samaria, the biblical name for the northern West Bank…

Someone ought to tell Kershner that there is a political-rhetorical war going on in Israel and that she has just played, inadvertently one hopes, into the settler’s hands by adopting their name for this territory known to the vast majority of the rest of Israel and the world as the West Bank.

In the following passage the hilltop youth leader illustrates the anti-democratic, seditious nature of his enterprise:

“Amona [another forced settlement withdrawal] pretty much divided this public into two parts, the more militant activist part and the more passive part,” said Mr. HaCohen, an Orthodox hilltop youth pioneer and a founder of Shalhevet Ya. The people, he said, “have to decide whether they are on the side of the Torah or the state.”

When will the Israeli political and intelligence apparatus recognize this movement as an imminent danger not just to Israeli democracy, but to the state itself.  What would any other state do with citizens who seek to overthrow it by violent means?  And why isn’t Israel doing this?  Will we have to see a successful assassination of Zeev Sternhell before real, vigorous action is taken?

The problem is that the state is schizophrenic when it comes to this movement.  It views it with some nostalgia since at one time the settlements were viewed favorably by many Israelis.  The government is wracked by indecisiveness in the face of the enormity of the challenge presented by the Jewish terrorists.  To truly eradicate them would require not just a legal and police campaign–it would also require a real resolution of the conflict with the Palestinians.

The following passage illustrates yet again that this movement rejects the forms and authority of the Israeli state:

“To go out and assault soldiers is wrong,” said David Ha’ivri, who handles foreign relations for the Samaria council. But, he said, “It is to be expected that when force is used, there will be counterforce.”

When parsing settler statements you have to cut through the polite chatter to get to the meat of the matter.  Above, Ha-Ivri is not saying that assaulting soldiers is wrong.  He is saying that it is entirely justified when soldiers attempt to impose the state’s will on them.  That, once again, is sedition.

The state’s inadequacy in the face of such at threat is perfectly exemplified in this passage:

The army refused to comment on the effects of the price-tag doctrine, saying it was too sensitive.

When faced with the opportunity to tell the readers of the N.Y. Times what it thought of the hilltop youth and their violent extremism, the IDF punted.  How telling.  It reminds me of Yeats phrase: “The center cannot hold.”  The settlers are the rough beast slouching toward Bethlehem (or Hebron) to be born.  The beast must be slain, but there is simply not enough resolve or conviction among those in government or the military to do so.

Sometimes, one wants to throw up one’s hands and say that if Israelis cannot take their own fate into their own hands and make the bold decisions and compromises necessary to ensure their survival, then perhaps they deserve whatever fate holds in store for them.  I fear that their fate, barring the type of decisiveness I’ve called for, will not be pretty.

As a child of Rockland County, N.Y., I find it highly ironic that hilltop youth “chief ideologist” HaCohen was born and raised in Monsey, a few minutes away from the town in which I grew up.  To think that while I was growing up such hate was spawning only a few miles away…

Max Silverstein: My Great Grandfather

Tuesday, May 24th, 2005

Max_silberstein_citizenship_papers1888_t

Max Silberstein’s citizenship papers (October, 1888) (credit: Alan Blair)

Max Silverstein was one of my paternal great-grandfathers.  Displayed here are his citizenship papers which were taken out in October, 1888:

Be it remembered that on the fifteenth day of October, in the year of Our Lord 1888, Max Silberstein appeared in the Superior Court of the City of New York and applied before the said court to [....] become a Citizen of the United States of American pursuant to the several acts of the Congress of the United States of America…

Thereupon it was ordered by the said court that the said applicant be admitted…by the said Court to be Citizen of the United States of America.

My newly discovered second cousin [correction: first cousin, once removed Bob corrects me], Bob Silverstein (son of Harry) writes this about Max and his emigration to this country from Hungary:

My father told me a few things about Max Silverstein but I don’t remember if he said when he came to the US.  He was from Szentes Hungary.  At the time, it was actually called Austria-Hungary.  You can find Szentes on a map.  It’s a fairly big city.  There was a Szentes "society" [landsmanschaft].  It was made up of Jews from Szentes and they would have periodic get togethers.  He also told me that Max was an avid baseball fan.  Even though he couldn’t read English, he would follow the standings in the newspaper and keep up on all the statistics.

His mother was named Mary (believe it or not).

Max’s affection for baseball is very interesting.  Of course, Ken Burns has told us that baseball was the great equalizer and you could be a fan no matter whether you were a greenhorn or a wealthy baron of industry.  I’m sure that explains Max’s love for the game.

My grandfather, Marcy, was an avid fan (Brooklyn Dodgers) as was my father (Boston Red Sox from the Ted Williams era) and my uncle Stan (New York Giants).

Max eventually married Tillie Neustadt.  Bob writes further about Tillie’s background:

Other information about Tillie Neustadt according to my father:  Her "real" name was Cecilia.  I don’t know what it was in Yiddish.  She came from Wiener Neustadt, which is a fairly large city about 60 miles west of Vienna.  [UPDATE: a reader from the city corrects this information in a comment below saying it has 40,000 inhabitants and is 30 miles south of Vienna] She came to the US when she was 8, so she was educated here.

The next is a little unusual, but I’ll repeat as I remember, Tillie had a brother who ran away from home when he was 12 years old.  He ended up in Ohio where he was adopted by a prominent family.  He eventually became a high ranking Ohio state official.  Something like Secretary of State.  He once came to visit the family on Elizabeth Street and he was obviously much better off financially than the Peekskill family.

My mother said she once wrote a letter to the Ohio side of the family, but they never responded.  We supposedly have some wealthy relatives in the Cleveland area.

Eventually, Max and Tillie moved to Peekskill where they had six boys and two daughters.  One of the boys was Marcy Silverstein, my paternal grandfather.

Marcy Silverstein: My Grandfather

Friday, May 20th, 2005
Tilliesilverstein8kids_tp_1

Tillie Silverstein and her eight children (Marcy is second
from right standing in suit) c. 1950-51
(credit: Alan Blair )

My grandfather was Marcy Silverstein.  He was born around 1900 as one of six brothers and two sisters to Tillie and Max Silverstein, all of whom are pictured in this photo except Max who died years earlier.  The picture was taken at a summer outing in or around Peekskill in 1950-51.  Except for Irving, I never saw any of the Silversteins after the early 1960s when Tillie died.  I visited Irving, who had changed his name to Silverst at his apartment in San Francisco with my brother, Todd around 1981.  I had no further contact with him after that.  I thank Julie Treistman and her brother Alan Blair for sending me this photo.

Marcy married Cele Goldsand and moved from Peekskill to Haverstraw, NY in the early 1920s.  My uncle Stanley was born around 1923 and my father, Jule followed in 1925.  The children were born at home (of course).  My grandfather owned a soda fountain-candy store in downtown Haverstraw.  He was active in local Democratic politics and served on the Haverstraw school board (his store was a hangout for local high school students since it was only a few blocks away from the school).

I can remember my uncle Stan telling me that Marcy and Jim Farley, who was the Rockland County Democratic boss and later FDR’s political "fixer" as governor and Postmaster General as president), would get in a car and drive down to Madison Square Garden to see "the fights."

I remember he sold home heating oil (probably in the winters).  He was also a volunteer fireman.  I remember one terrifying visit to the local fire station where the firemen eagerly showed off their gleaming red engine and asked me to join them for a ride.  A shy, retiring child, I was terrified of the machine and wanted nothing to do with it.  Imagine that?!  Once I was sitting on Marcy’s front porch when the fire horn rang.  It had a distinctive pattern and my grandfather told me that from the number of toots of the horn and the rhythmic pattern you could tell where the fire was and which companies were being called to fight it.

My grandfather also liked to eat oranges peel and all.  He had a terrible temper and I can remember hearing him bellow at the top of his lungs even as a small child (very frightening).  My father too had a bad temper that could be frightening at times.

What’s interesting about all this is that the Silverstein family essentially scattered to the wind in the late 1960s as far as my immediate family was concerned.  But Ruth’s daughter, Julie Treistman discovered one of my sites and wrote an e mail asking if I was her long lost cousin, Richard.  What followed has become an electrifying and welcome reconnection with the long lost Silverstein side of my family.

Breastfeeding in Public: What Are They Afraid Of?

Sunday, February 6th, 2005

Breastfeed (credit: sxc.hu/xtramsn)

Before I get to the issue at hand, a new study by the American Academy of Pediatrics throwing light on the breastfeeding practices of American mothers (see Reuters AlertNet – U.S. doctors urge mothers to breast-feed longer) inspired this post.  While the study finds that the rate of breastfeeding has gradually increased over the past decade, the incidence of breastfeeding at six months of age is still only 33% (those mothers who solely breastfeed or supplement).  Only 1 in 7 breastfeed exclusively at 6 months (which is what the AAP recommends).  The numbers should be higher, much higher.

There’s one thing I don’t fully understand about the study (and perhaps one of my more learned readers can explain this to me), pediatricians encourage EXCLUSIVE breastfeeding for the first six months of life.  My wife breastfed all our children, but even though she stayed home for the early months she always supplemented.  If she didn’t she would never have gotten any sleep.  So someone tell me why is exclusive breastfeeding so important (or is it)?

When my family travels back east to visit my wife’s and my family, I notice a tremendous sociological gap in attitudes toward breastfeeding.  Perhaps this is an overblown or mistaken notion (and please correct me if you disagree), but I sense that there is a more rigid and traditionalist attitude in the east toward religious, moral and cultural issues–breastfeeding being one.

On one of these trips, I read this remarkable story in the New York Times, Removal of painting irks nursing mothers.


She Nourishes (2001) by Shawn Del Joyce (credit: Shawndeljoyce.com)

Newburgh’s (NY) Stewart International Airport unveiled an art exhibition which included a four-panel display called She Nourishes by Shawn Del Joyce.  One of the panels showed a mother breastfeeding.  Horror of horrors!  A small group of airport passengers complained about the impropriety (!) of showing such an indecent image in a public (though privately owned) building.  The airport directed that the offending artwork be removed.  In the New York Times, Stewart spokeswoman Kiran Jain explained:’

‘We reacted to this particular thing in the same way we would if someone told us the knob in the men’s room was broken,” she said. ”It was immediate and we responded to our passengers. They come first.”

Hmm.  Tell me again how a painting of a mother breastfeeding is like a broken men’s room knob?  There are so many weirdnesses about this analogy I’ll just leave you to ponder them.

Ms. Jain placed her foot even deeper in her mouth when she tried to defend the airport’s philistinism to the Times Herald Record thus: "Breast-feeding is ‘a controversial issue all over the world.’"  Whoa!  Controversial??  Maybe in Newburgh, but not where I come from (Seattle).  What do they put in the water there anyway to make people such nervous nellies about a perfectly normal function of the human body?

The Record story continues:

Only in America is there a juvenile sector of the population that regards the nourishment of an infant as a sexual act. America is like a preadolescent who hides copies of National Geographic under his mattress so that, after dark, he can surreptitiously whip out his flashlight and be titillated by pictures of bare-breasted African women nursing their babies.

I can’t help but wonder how Stewart officials would react to real, live women breast-feeding their babies in the airport. Of course, far be it for me to suggest that all breast-feeding women in the region should hold an organized nurse-in at the airport. It’s not my place to foment a demonstration.

I just mean, I’m really, really wondering what would happen if such a thing were to occur. Really. If you get my drift.

And guess what happened, a group of mothers held their own Feed-In demonstration against the prudery of Stewart Airport officials.  Good for them.

Which brings me to my adventures in breastfeeding with my own family.  On the same trip in which I read the above Times article, I spent an afternoon with my blood relatives.  Janis needed to breastfeed our then 1 year old son, Jonah.  Janis breastfeeds very discreetly in these types of situations and probably sensed there might be some sensitivity on my mother’s part, so everyone in the living room hardly knew what she was doing.  Nevertheless, my mother got up with a big "harrumph!" and stomped out of the room saying something like: "I’m not going to stand for this!"  Shades of Stewart (Stewart is about 20 miles from my family’s New York home)!

My mother is, of course, a prude.  She’s never been comfortable with the human body (her own or anyone else’s).  And, in fact, my mother was quite emotionally abusive to all of her children (that’s a separate post entirely).  So she didn’t come close to earning the right to complain about what Janis had done.  I was livid (lots of baggage there of course that had nothing to do with this particular incident) on my wife’s and Jonah’s behalf.  Why should they be made to feel they’d done anything wrong when they’d been engaged in what should be one of the most natural activities a mother and baby can do?  [In my original post, due to my faulty memory (writing a few years after this incident happened) I mischaracterized what follows in this story (which I am now correcting).  I apologize for my faulty memory and for the hurt my description caused to any family members who were there.]

Anyway, no one in the room at the time of the incident said anything as my mother stormed out, perhaps out of stunned shock.  Then one relative in the room said: "Hey, but look at it this way–your dad [who is dead] would’ve reacted a lot worse to breastfeeding."  And this is supposed to comfort you somehow?  At that point, I left the room.  Two of my relatives then told Janis they were sorry about what happened.  But neither talked at all about my mother’s behavior.  One has to give them credit for being sensitive enough to say they were sorry to Janis (who was in shock at the time).  But the problem is that my mother’s behavior was but an exagerrated version of what passes for the norm in the east (a strong resistance to breastfeeding in public).

Aside from the weird proclivities of my own family, I really wonder whether here in the west there may be freer or looser social attitudes toward a whole gamut of issues: religious affiliation, divorce, gay/lesbian rights and last but not least breastfeeding.  I wonder if any sociologist has studied this?

USA Today published its own interesting take of the AAP study: USATODAY.com – Nursing moms advised to keep babies close by

Haverstraw Civil War Poster

Tuesday, October 12th, 2004
Haverstraw_civil_war_poster

1862 Civil War poster from New York Historical Society (credit: New York Historical Society collection)

I’ve written here in this blog about my father, Jule Silverstein’s roots in Haverstraw, NY. In doing research on a series of posts I’ve written about my family’s history in the Hudson River Valley, I came across this wonderful poster (“The Rebellion, Its Cause and Cure”) which promotes: “A meeting for a free discussion of the Great Principle involved in the present War for the Union” to be held on September 24th [1862] at the Wigwam, which I’d suspect was a tavern or bar of that time. I’d guess that this meeting would’ve been a recruitment session to encourage Haverstraw natives to join the Union army since several Union regiments included recruits from the village. Haverstraw and its environs played an especially important role in Revolutionary War history and this poster indicates that her sons continued to serve faithfully the Union cause.

My father was a social studies teacher at Haverstraw, and later North Rockland High Schools from 1954-1989. He especially liked American history and of course, local history. I share these interests. That’s why I so enjoyed finding this poster on the web.

William Henry Jackson: 19th Century Photography Pioneer in Peekskill

Friday, August 6th, 2004

North from West_Point--William Henry_jacksonYesterday, I took my 3 year old son with me for lunch at the Frye Museum café. I noticed in the lunchroom a poster for the current exhibition, Eloquent Vistas, a collection of 19th photography from George Eastman House that detailed great American landscapes.

I am a keen admirer of photography and decided I had to see the exhibit. Jonah, of course, loved the photographs of the Lehigh Valley Railroad and the train trestles over the Appamatox. But I was struck by William Henry Jackson‘s “Peekskill Bay, Hudson River,” an 1882 portrait (see below image) of Peekskill’s harbor and the Hudson River beyond. Why? My family roots go back to 1900 in Peekskill and I’m always interested to learn anything new about the town. I’d previously never heard of William Henry Jackson or of this picture, so I was naturally excited.

I went home and searched forlornly online for that image or any other historic photos of Peekskill or that portion of the Hudson River. The Eastman site didn’t seem to have the picture on-line. Nor did any other site. But finally I discoverd the Detroit Company Collection of the LIbrary of Congress. Eureka–I’d found it!

peekskill_bay--gene panczenko

Peekskill Bay (credit: Gene Panczenko)

I was awestruck at the treasury of American cultural and social memory represented by the Library’s American Memory website. It is meant to be a comprehensive online digital repository of the American past. Unlike, many such online repositories, I found it to be rich in artifacts and a treasure trove of our heritage. The photographic images below are all from the Photos and Prints section of the site. All the Jackson images in this post can be viewed at the “William Henry Jackson, Hudson River” search result page of the American Memory site.

In my online search for the Jackson Peekskill photograph, I managed to locate a remarkable Hudson Valley photographer, Gene Panczenko, who took a 2002 photo (see right) from virtually the same location as Jackson. It’s interesting to compare what a historical photograph and a contemporary one of the same site look like.


peekskill_bay-Hudson River--William Henry Jackson Peekskill_Bay_and the Narrows-William Henry Jackson


High Tor: Magnificent Views of Hudson Valley

Wednesday, July 14th, 2004

high_tor_map

WHOEVER has made a voyage up the Hudson must remember the Kaatskill mountains. They are a dismembered branch of the great Appalachian family, and are seen away to the west of the river, swelling up to a noble height, and lording it over the surrounding country. Every change of season, every change of weather, indeed, every hour of the day, produces some change in the magical hues and shapes of these mountains, and they are regarded by all the good wives, far and near, as perfect barometers. When the weather is fair and settled, they are clothed in blue and purple, and print their bold outlines on the clear evening sky; but, sometimes, when the rest of the landscape is cloudless, they will gather a hood of gray vapors about their summits, which, in the last rays of the setting sun, will glow and light up like a crown of glory.

At the foot of these fair mountains, the voyager may have descried the light smoke curling up from a village, whose shingle-roofs gleam among the trees, just where the blue tints of the upland melt away into the fresh green of the nearer landscape. It is a little village, of great antiquity, having been founded by some of the Dutch colonists, in the early times of the province, just about the beginning of the government of the good Peter Stuyvesant, (may he rest in peace!) and there were some of the houses of the original settlers standing within a few years, built of small yellow bricks brought from Holland, having latticed windows and gable fronts, surmounted with weather-cocks.

–Rip Van Winkle, Washington Irving

I grew up in Rockland County in the heart of the Hudson Valley. As a child, my dad loved to hike locally to unfold the region’s extraordinary beauty and history for me. We hiked throughout Harriman (Palisades) State Park. But the first hike I remember was up High Tor. There are several approaches, but the one he chose was through the High Tor Vineyard, which sits just about a small village called Centenary.

After hiking up the mountain, we were rewarded with an extraordinary 360 degree view of the entire Hudson Valley. It isn’t a particularly difficult climb or steep ascent nor do you top out at a formidable elevation. But the view rivals some of the great peaks for its sweep and scope.high_tor_poster_1

The town of Haverstraw (my father’s birthplace) lay spread out at our feet. I could see the high school where he taught for over 30 years. I could even see his birthplace at 103 Hudson Avenue. There was the railroad line where, as an eager child, I waved at the engineers in the cabooses of all the trains that passed. But most important of all, the Hudson River, one of the great rivers of the world, laid out before me like a wide, waving ribbon cutting through the Hudson Highlands as far as the eye could see. At Haverstraw, the river is 3 1/2 miles wide, the greatest width in its entire run from the Adirondacks to New York City. This is the reason that Henry Hudson anchored in Haverstraw Bay on his return southward journey down the Hudson River in 1609. My dad even told me about one frigid winter when the entire river froze from Haverstraw to Ossining on the other side allowing people to walk from shore to shore.

This hike first introduced me to the majesty of the Hudson. Ever since, I’ve loved mountains more than any other outdoor terrain (now I’ve been in the Sierras, Cascades, Sybellines and others). But the Hudson Highlands will always hold a special place in my heart.

high_tor_toward_haverstraw_1900

early 1900s image of Haverstraw from High Tor (credit: Town of Haverstraw website)

This is where Rip Van Winkle (in Washington Irving’s story of the same name) laid down for his twenty winks which turned into 20 years of sleep. This is where Benedict Arnold met Maj. John Andre to plot the betrayal of West Point to the British. This is the beloved land which Maxwell Anderson saved from the wrecker’s ball with his Pulitzer Prize-winning play, High Tor (see accompanying play poster–there was also a 1956 film version starring Bing Crosby (!) as Van Van Dorn). This is the land of my father.

High Tor is a national historic landmark and managed by the Palisades Interstate Park Commission. A park staff member directed me to Friends of Palisades, an eye-catching website devoted to the parks and historic sites managed by PIPC.

The Peekskill (NY) Riots (1949)

Wednesday, June 16th, 2004

peekskill_concert_posterFirst, I should explain my own personal interest in the 1949 Peekskill riots. My maternal grandmother’s and grandfather’s families settled in Peekskill sometime before 1920 and I still have a few family members who live there. As a child, I spent lots of time there visiting my dad’s family. I always felt especially close to my great uncle Izzy (Isadore) Goldsand, who was a leader of the local Jewish community, a large property owner, real estate entrepreneur and Democratic Party operative. (In fact, my grandfather Marcy Silverstein used to drive with Jim Farley [Haverstraw's Democratic Party boss] into NYC to see “the fights” at Madison Square Garden). My Uncle Izzy is long gone as is my father and grandfather, but I’d love to ask them what they thought of the riots and how they reacted when they happened. One or both of them might have even been there for all I know.

Peekskill’s Place in American Cold War History

On August 29, 1949, People’s Artists (a folk music concert organizer formed by Pete Seeger) attempted to host a benefit concert for Paul Robeson’s Civil Rights Congress at the Lakeland Picnic Ground just outside Peekskill, NY. Hundreds of locally-based demonstrators prevented the concert from taking place by viciously assaulting Robeson’s followers who had gathered to help organize the event. While a second concert on September 4th, drew 25,000 to hear Robeson sing, at least 500 right-wing demonstrators assaulted the exiting cars of concertgoers with rocks sending scores to the hospital.

The Peekskill riots were a pivotal moment in American Cold Way history. They also significantly impacted the nascent civil rights movement. To understand the ingredients that combined to ignite this conflagration, one must look to social conditions in the town itself. The Standard Brands-Fleischman’s plant was headquartered there along the Hudson. Plant managers were in the midst of a serious downsizing from wartime employment levels, bringing the plant’s employee rolls down from 1,200 to under 800. In addition, they were hardcore anti-unionists and anti-Communists. There was also “an active [Peekskill] Ku Klux Klan chapter” (The Peekskill Story).

Peekskill’s scenic setting in the Hudson River Valley encouraged the development of a a resort colony, Mohegan Lake, that attracted thousands to the area each summer and catered to vacationing workers from New York City, some of whom were affiliated with the labor movement and Communist causes. Pete Seeger himself lived a short drive up the road in Beacon. So there was a strong pro-labor contingent in the local community as well.

At the end of World War II, the Black soldiers and unionists returning home hoped to find a nation more sympathetic to their concerns. FDR and the New Deal had given them great hope that things were changing for the better for the working class and minorities. But once the Iron Curtain closed, Stalin tested the hydrogen bomb (1949) and China fell into the hands of the Communists (also 1949), a severe anti-Communist, racist backlash developed. Groups like the American Legion, the Ku Klux Klan and others attempted to spearhead the reaction against all they saw as threatening the “American way of life.”

If you add to this social mix a local newspaper editor (Peekskill Evening Star) who hobnobbed with the Standard Brand executives and curried favor with them in the pages of his paper (in which they were major advertisers), it’s not hard to see that Peekskill was a combustible community waiting to explode.

The right-wing counter-reaction to the concerts might also be seen to have the support of the Catholic Church (many of the veterans protesting were affiliated with Catholic veterans groups) and the federal government. Shortly before Robeson’s second concert, Secretary of Defense Louis Johnson (in the Truman Administration) spoke to the Peekskill American Legion. His speech was covered in the Evening Star:

Peace Through Power

“We will build our ramparts so strong that no aggressor will dare attack us.”

That was the declaration of Defense Secretary Louis Johnson before the American Legion. It may be taken as the policy of the national administration. Secretary Johnson did not mince words.

Twice in our lifetime we have had peace within our hands and twice we lost it. If we make the same mistake the third time it may be our last chance. Secretary Johnson made no mystery as to what possible aggressor he had in mind. He named Russia bluntly. Into every political vacuum which developed after World War ll, she has pushed with propaganda and military force, dropping the Iron Curtain to envelop each new conquest.

Already we have gone a long way to correct the mistake of our demobilization stampede. We can have peace, said Secretary Johnson, if we want it – but only if we are prepared to fight for it. Now that we are fully awake, we are grimly determined that history shall not repeat itself.

With all the institutional forces (police, press, federal/state/local governments and Church) aligned against Robeson and his followers, it is no wonder that the reactionary forces felt emboldened to act as brutally as they did.

Paul Robeson’s Role

Paul Robeson had already performed several noneventful benefit concerts in Peekskill for his organization, the Civil Rights Congress. But in April, 1949, Robeson attended the World Peace Conference in Paris. After singing at the Conference, he gave an interview to AP in which he said:

“It is unthinkable that American Negroes will go to war in behalf of those who have oppressed us for generations…against a country (the Soviet Union) which in one generation has raised our people to the full dignity of mankind.”
(from Highlands.com)

The Highlands.com site goes on to say: “He was misquoted in newspapers across the country as saying ‘Negroes won’t fight for US.’” I beg to differ. I think it is reasonable to assume that this is not only what he said, but what he meant. Not that I’m saying that his comments warranted the right-wing response. After all, Martin Luther King said much the same regarding the Vietnam War in 1964. But history demands that we whitewash neither our friends nor our enemies. The plain fact is that Robeson’s views and public comments (especially considering the chilly times in which they were formed) could be tremendously confrontational and provocative (not to mention flat out wrong as in his comment about the Soviet Union restoring Blacks to the “full dignity of mankind”). One thing one must say is that Martin Luther King, while he blazed an equally revoluntionary path, learned a few things from Robeson’s experience about how to address and persuade a white audience of the benefits of his viewpoint over their own.

This interview was taken up by right wing forces and trumpeted far and wide, stirring immense racist and political hatred against Robeson, American Communism and the civil rights movement. By the time Robeson and People’s Artists announced the August 27th concert, the anti-Communist forces were ready to make their stand.Demonstrators milling around Peekskill concert entrance

The First Concert–August 29, 1949

Howard Fast has produced the most compelling account of that first concert in Being Red (1990) his memoir of a life on the Left. In this passage, he describes his first inkling of trouble brewing on the night of the first concert:

A boy running. I watched as he came in sight around the bend of the road, running frantically, and then we crowded around him and he told us that there was trouble and would some of us come– because the trouble looked bad; he was frightened too.

We started back with him. There were twenty-five or thirty of us, I suppose; you don’t count at a moment like that, although I did later. There were men and boys, almost all the men and boys. I thought that this would be no more than foul names and fouler insults. So we ran on up to the entrance, and as we appeared, they poured onto us from the road, at least a hundred of them with billies and brass knuckles and rocks and clenched fists, and American Legion caps, and sud- denly my disbelief was washed away in a wild melee. Such fights don’t last long; there were three or four minutes of this, and because the road was narrow and embanked, we were able to beat them back, but the mass of them filled the entranceway, and behind them were hundreds more, and up and down the road, still more.

I said that we beat them back and held the road for the moment, panting, hot with sweat and dust, bleeding only a little now; but they would have come at us again had not three deputy sheriffs appeared. They hefted their holstered guns, and they turned and spread their arms benignly at the mob. “Now, boys,” they said, “now take it easy, because we can do this just as well legal, and it always pays to do it legal.”

“Give us five minutes and we’ll murder the white niggers,” the boys answered.

Fast then describes how he readied his forty-two volunteers to fend off the mob’s second attack:

Now the remaining men from below appeared and I counted what we had. All told, including myself, there were forty-two men and boys. I divided them into seven groups of six, three lines of two groups each–in other words, three lines of twelve–formed across the road where the embankment began, each line anchored on a wooden fence, our flanks protected by the ditch and the water below. The seventh group was held in reserve in our rear.

The mob was rolling toward us for the second attack. This was, in a way, the worst of that night. For one thing, it was still daylight; later, when night fell, our own sense of organization helped us much more, but this was daylight and they poured down the road and into us, swinging broken fenceposts, billies, bottles, and wielding knives. Their leaders had been drinking from pocket flasks and bottles right up to the moment of the attack, and now as they beat and clawed at our line, they poured out a torrent of obscene words and slogans. “We’ll finish Hitler’s job! Fuck you white niggers! Give us Robeson! We’ll string that big nigger up!” and more and more of the same.

We concentrated on holding our lines. The first line took the brunt of the fighting, the brunt of the rocks and the clubs. The second line linked arms, as did the third, forming a human wall to the mob. In that fight, four of our first line were badly injured. When they went down, we pulled them back, and men in the second line moved into their places. Here were forty-two men and boys who had never seen each other before, and they were fighting like a well-oiled machine, and the full weight of the screaming madmen did not panic them or cause them to break. By sheer weight, we were forced back foot by foot, but they never broke the line.

Fast proceeds to describe how press reporters and photographers, state and local police and even Department of Justice investigators stood by while the riot proceeded apace:

Though the police and state troopers were remarkably, conspicuously absent, the press were on the scene. Newspaper photographers were everywhere, taking picture after picture, and reporters crouched in the headlights, taking notes of all that went on. In particular, my attention was drawn to three quiet, well-dressed, good-looking men who stood just to one side at the entrance; two of them had notebooks in which they wrote methodically and steadily. When I first saw them I decided that they were newspapermen and dismissed them from my mind. But I saw them again and again, and later talked to them, as you will see. Subsequently, I discovered they were agents of the Department of Justice. Whether they were assigned to a left-wing concert or to an attempted mass murder, I don’t know. They were polite, aloof, neutral, and at one point decently helpful. They were always neutral–even though what they saw was attempted murder, a strangely brutal terrible attempt.

He then describes the third wave of mob violence:

I had not fought this way in twenty years, not since my days in the slums where I was raised, not since the gang fights of a kid in the New York streets; but now it was for our lives, for all that the cameras were flashing and the newspapermen taking it down blow by blow, so you could read in your morning papers how a few reds in Westchester County were lynched.

It was night now, and now for the first time I understood our situation completely and could guess what the odds were that we would all die in this way, so uselessly and stupidly.

And the FBI men watched calmly and took notes.

I looked at my watch–still less than two hours since I had kissed my little daughter.

As Fast and his men beat a retreat with the help of a truck, its headlights lit up the onrushing crowd:

These lit the whole of the meadow, and as we swung around at the bottom, we saw the mob of screaming, swearing patriots, chanting their new war cry, “Kill a commie for Christ,” and their lust to kill the “white niggers,” break over the hillside and pour down into the light.

Fast’s group of men counterattacked:

then we drove into them because there was nothing else to do. At this point, we were half crazy, as full of hate as they were, and so violent was our fury and our own screams that they broke and ran. They turned at forty or fifty yards, formed a wide circle, and stared at us and swore at us with every filthy word they could remember. We, on the other hand, climbed onto the platform and made a line in front of the women and kids. Here, at least, we could use our feet to kick. The children, half frozen with terror, watched all this. The women began to sing the Star-Spangled Banner, urging the children, most of them in tears, to join in.

Then the lights went out. Someone had cut the line from the generator, and now the mob, in utter frustration at finding a handful of “commies” so hard to kill, seemed to go absolutely crazy. They attacked the chairs. We couldn’t see them, but through the darkness we heard them raging among the folding chairs, throwing them around, splintering and splashing them. It was not only senseless, it was sick– horrible and pathological. Then one of them lit a fire, about thirty or forty yards from the platform. A chair went on the fire, and then another and another, and then a whole pile of the chairs. Then they discovered our table of books and pamphlets, and then, to properly crown the evening, they reenacted the Nuremberg book burning, which had become a world symbol of fascism. Standing there, arms linked, we watched the Nuremberg memory come alive again. The fire roared up and the defenders of the “American way of life” seized piles of our books and danced around the blaze, flinging the books into the fire as they danced.

Fast closes his narrative with the odd, surrealistic touch of the FBI agents approaching his group and commending them on their fortitude and bravery and then offering to take the seriously wounded among them to the hospital. And because of their desperation, they do the even odder thing of accepting the offer. Such horrible events can make for very strange bedfellows.

Fast sums up the moral lesson to be learned from the Riots:

I have included the above, not only because it deeply affected my own life and my thinking, but also because it illustrates how easily, when terror is unleashed in a nation, it can take hold, and how thin the line is that separates constitutional government from tyranny and dictatorship.

You may read another moving firsthand account by Virginia Hirsch (compiled in 1998) at The First Peekskill “riot”: August 27, 1949. Some of the details of her account conflict with Fast’s but she also corroborates his account in other significant ways. The differences are to be expected in the aftermath of such a harrowing and traumatic event which might easily distort recollections.Paul Robeson sings at 2nd Peekskill concert

The Second Concert–September 4, 1949

The second concert proceeded differently. Concert organizers planned well for security before and during the concert with thousands of union members and soldiers volunteering to provide security. From this account, we can see the very real and ominous danger that the anti-concert protestors posed:

Other teams patrolled the hills and found two sniper nests. The men in them had rifles with telescopic sights. The rifles were destroyed, the men roughed up and escorted from the grounds (from The Second Robeson Concert). In an interview with Cathy Golden, Howard Fast revealed that Paul Robeson was their intended target.

25,000 people (according to Irwin Silber’s 1951 SingOut! review of Peekskill, U.S.A.) heard Robeson sing that night. But the organizers made a terrible error in not ensuring a peaceful and secure exit for concertgoers after the concert. They allowed the police to close all but one exit road–and this was a narrow “country lane” (as Fast calls it) several miles long alongside which thugs stood hurling rocks at each passing car. This, of course caused many serious injuries and filled local hospital emergency rooms. One attendee even lost the sight in an eye from the rock throwing.

Today, we may know that there is anti-Semitism and racism smoldering within this country. But it lurks beneath a veneer of civility and is rarely expressed openly. What is extraordinary about Peekskill is that the riots laid bare the ugly, seething hatred within a typical American community. I have rarely heard an overt anti-Semitic remark in my life. I have never had to raise my fists to protect my own honor or that of my religion. In Peekskill, Jews and Blacks had to do all of that and more. The mind boggles at the courage, bravery and physical prowess Fast and his colleagues had to muster to protect themselves and the ideas they believed in. For an amazing first-hand audio testament to their bravery, I invite you to listen to Hold the Line, which contains actual audiotape of the ranting, raging crowd at the Riots (from The Peekskill Story).

We should add to this, the shameful role played by not only the local press, but local and state politicians going as high as Gov. Thomas Dewey, all of whom whitewashed the pogrom that had engulfed Peekskill. All of this combines to make Peekskill a watershed moment in mid-20th century American history.

Now we can look back from the comfort of our liviing rooms and ‘civilized’ society at a time when civil rights, workers rights, and freedom of expression stood in the balance. Luckily, history turned against such reactionary thinking and embraced many of the ideas represented by Fast, Robeson and the other concertgoers at those two events. I am by no means saying that the struggle for tolerance and equal opportunity is over and won (all we have to do is look at the front page of the newspaper to tell us this is not so). But if the Peekskill Evening Stars of the world had had their way, this nation would be an even more stifling, repressive and ugly place than it is.

I began thinking of writing this post when my brother, Marc, sent me a link to the Hudson Highlands site. He wrote to me: “Isn’t it a shame no one’s made this into a movie!” In doing research for this article, I discovered that Barbara Kopple (Harland County, USA) is shooting a film about the Riots titled Joe Glory. Knowing the quality of her previous films, it will undoubtedly do the event justice and place it within it’s proper context in American history. Not enough Americans know about Peekskill. Barbara Kopple should change that.

Several novels have told the story as part of a larger narrative: E.L. Doctorow’s Book of Daniel and T.C. Boyle’s World’s End. Non-fiction writers as well have portrayed the events: Howard Fast’s Peekskill U.S.A. and Joseph Walwik‘s The Peekskill, New York, Anti-Communist Riots of 1949. You can also hear Margo Adler’s NPR 50th anniversary commemoration of Peekskill riots. The Voices of History Video Project also chronicles the riots in this 1979 production. The Maryknoll Sisters (whose headquarters is near Peekskill) produced The Peekskill Riots, an audio documentary.

Performance Optimization WordPress Plugins by W3 EDGE