Mahzor

New York Public Library

Churches

Sarajevo Haggadah

Mah Nishtanah

Sarajevo haggadah

Antaea Darom

Israeli women's art

Action

Torah as music

Ben Heine

Action

ceramic bowl

Mohammad Said Kalash, "Offering Reconciliation" exhibit (photo: Ilan Amihai)

Action

Punch and Judy/Pinchas and Jamila

Avi Katz

Action

David Grossman

Ben Heine

Action

Eldrige Street shul

Lower East Side

Action

Dove

Ben Heine

Action

Two birds

Hoda Jamal

Action

Israeli and Palestinian boys

from documentary, Promises

Action

Cat in the Hat

Yiddish version

Action

Daylight through the Wall

Banksy: graffiti art on Separation Wall

Action

Maurice Sendak's Brundibar set

New Victory Theater (photo: Nan Melville/NYT)

Action

Daniel Barenboim, West-Eastern Divan Orchestra

Palestinian-Israeli musical ensemble (photo: Kerstin Joensson/AP)

Action

Great Day on Eldrige Street

N.Y.'s klezmer greats celebrate shul rededication (photo: Leo Sorel)

Action

Joint Appeal for Peace

(Avi Katz)

Joint Appeal for Peace

Ketubah, Ancona, Italy (1772)

(Jewish Theological Seminary library)

Ancona ketubah

Archive for November, 2011

U.S. to Sell Bunker Buster Bombs to UAE for Use Against Iran

Friday, November 11th, 2011
bunker buster bomb

JDAM bunker buster bomb

It’s a sly and devious approach to promoting Middle East arms proliferation and saber rattling against Iran: the Obama administration (unlike the Bush administration which refused to do so) has already supplied Israel with the bunker buster bombs which they would need to (try to) take out Iran’s nuclear facilities.  But this makes us look like Israel’s weapons pimp.  So what better way to defuse that claim than by arming an Arab country that hates Iran almost as much as Israel, with the same weapons?  Now, if only Israel can persuade UAE to launch a joint attack on Iran you’d have an Israeli-Arab Coalition of the Willing, even if it’s only two.

Return to Anatot, Pogrom Redux

Thursday, November 10th, 2011
anatot pogromists to justice

Caption: 'Criminals of Anatot to justice! November 11th at 1PM'

In a few hours, the courageous activists of Sheikh Jarrah will return to Anatot (English here), the site of a horrific pogrom several weeks ago which involved a knife assault by a settler hooligan-resident, a sexual assault, and broken ribs and noses suffered by the protesters.  I only wish I could join them myself.  But if you are in Israel and see this in time and can join the hevra, please do so.  It is critical to rally in support of the Palestinian farmer denied access to his fields by the Anatot settlement.  It is critical to support the right to protest in a free country.

The Israeli police for several weeks have denied protesters the right to return to Anatot because they claim doing so would be a provocation against the residents.  Sheikh Jarrah appealed to the Israeli Supreme Court.  But before a hearing could be held, the State attorney general informed the police it could not defend their position in court, which gave them no choice but to drop the matter.

Now, protesters going to test the law.  Will Israeli police stand by as they did at the first demonstration and allow their fellow Israelis to be beaten to a pulp yet again by settler pogromists?  Or will they maintain order as police tend to do in democratic societies?  If you’re betting for the latter I wouldn’t want to steal your money.  Can you imagine a police force whose legal position just had its legs cut out from under it by the attorney general, feeling inclined to do anything on behalf of the activists?

Justice for victims of Anatot!  To support the work of Sheikh Jarrah Solidarity, donate here.

Shin Bet Withheld Iran Secrets from Lieberman as Security Risk

Thursday, November 10th, 2011

UPDATE: AP’s Diaa Hadid just published a more detailed story on this subject that is worth reading.

Israel Defense, the publication which covers the Israeli defense industry, reports that when Avigdor Lieberman was Minister for Strategic Affairs, in an earlier iteration of the Netnayahu government, the Shin Bet, which reviews and approves security clearances, refused to approve access to some of the nation’s secret information about Iran.  In contrast, the current minister filling that portfolio, Moshe Yaalon, has full access.

If true, this report raises all sorts of questions and red flags.  One has to wonder why he would be deprived of such information.  The mind immediately turns to Lieberman’s close ties to Russia, where he is on especially good terms with the leadership and makes frequent visits to Moscow.  Of course, Russia is one of Iran’s leading trading partners, is building the Bushehr nuclear plant, and provides Iran some of the most advanced anti-aircraft missile technology.  Russia would be very interested to know what Israel knows about its affairs in Iran.  In fact, much of the information provided on this subject that made it into the IAEA report seems to have derived from Israeli intelligence.  This may be one reason why the Shin Bet would worry about allowing Lieberman access.

A senior Israeli source with high-level political and military experience tells me that there have been rumors for years that Lieberman was sent to Israel by the KGB as a young immigrant in order to make his mark and rise upward in Israeli politics. To anyone who argues that such rumors are unsubstantiated, I would remind them that there were unsubstantiated rumors for years about Moshe Katsav’s sexual predatory habits. He’s about to spend seven years in prison. Since the end of Ben Gurion’s reign, the Shin Bet has been prohibited from monitoring Israeli (Jewish politicians), so no one can determine whether the rumor is true.

avigdor lieberman flyer

Broadside flyer displayed in Jerusalem last month accusing Avigdor Lieberman of being head of Russian spy ring

An anonymous flyer (in Hebrew, a pashkevil or “broadside”) oddly titled, “I Think Therefore I Am,” was posted in Jerusalem last month, which accused Lieberman of being the head of a Russian spy ring inside Israel:

The State of Israel is powerless in the face of Russian spy services, directed by the chair of Yisrael Beitenu, Avigdor Lieberman and his partners in the Party.  Some of the Israeli media has offered less than candid or even misleading information on this subject.

We demand the foreign minister be investigated according to the evidence and gravity of his deeds.  We announce to the weak ones who stand at the head of this nation, that the people dwelling in Zion will not allow those entrusted with its secrets to leak them to a state [Russia] which enjoys close intelligence relations with Syria, Iran and Hezbollah.

When I first received the flyer I didn’t know what to make of it: was it authentic?  Did the writer know what he was talking about or was it a smear without foundation?  Who would have the motive to do this?  And why would they put up a flyer rather than leak it to the Israeli media?

The Israel Defense story is the first indication that Lieberman really is considered a security risk by Israel’s intelligence services.  Which means that whoever wrote the flyer knew this.  Either the author had connections with intelligence or somehow became aware of the issue through second-hand sources.  I still can’t figure out why someone posts a flyer on the street with such information rather than leak it to the media–unless they’d tried and failed to interest a reporter in the story.

A 2009 U.S. embassy cable published by Wikileaks (be sure to click tiny red box with an “x” to remove donation pop up) reports the following:

Israeli FM Lieberman’s June 2-3 visit to Russia appears…to have…cemented Moscow’s impression that the Russian-speaking Lieberman is one of their own.

…[Israeli deputy chief of mission] Fuchs explained that Lieberman conducted his meetings in Russian, shared stories about Moscow, and smoked, creating a comfortable atmosphere with his Russian interlocutors. The Israeli FM “behaved like an old friend” commented Fuchs, who thought that the Russians acted as if they already knew him.

So much “one of their own” that he’d spy on their behalf?

At any rate, we now know that not only is the former Moldovan nightclub bouncer and convicted child-beater corrupt, but he’s also accused of being a Russian mole.

Border Police Officer Who Pulled Trigger Saying ‘Death to Arabs’ Sentenced

Thursday, November 10th, 2011

In a rare instance of accountability, an Israeli judge sentenced Shani Sivilya, an Israeli Border Policewoman to three months in prison for taunting and abusing a Palestinian child she’d arrested. The abuse included a mock execution in which fired her gun at the blindfolded victim and shouted “death to Arabs.”. In truth, this qualifies as torture, though in Israel when it’s a Palestinian victim it’s only called “abuse.”

A fellow officer apparently had a conscience about what she’d done and testified against her, also unusual in these cases. Sivilya also featured swaggering tough gal photos of herself on her Facebook page replete with anti-Arab racist taunts. She provided the evidence to convict herself.

The probation recommendation offered to the judge recommended she not receive any jail time, but the judge rejected it and sent her away for three months. If you consider that in most other legal systems she would’ve charged with attempted murder and received a far stiffer sentence, she got off exceedingly lightly. It should also be noted that prosecutions in such cases are exceedingly rare and usually only happen when the defendant has done something very public that the authorities find it difficult to overlook.

All that being said, we have to welcome justice in whatever guise it takes.

Israel vs. Free Press: Uri Blau Faces Seven Years in Prison for Practicing Investigative Journalism

Thursday, November 10th, 2011
uri blau

Uri Blau: shining a lens on Israeli society

Haaretz’ Uri Blau, one of Israel’s finest investigative journalists, faces seven years in prison for doing nothing more than practicing his craft in a country that upholds the values of a national security state above those of press freedom.  Blau has published some of the most hard-hitting exposes involving the IDF and human rights violations over the past few years.  Among them was the two reports he wrote based on top-secret documents leaked to him by Anat Kamm.  These were memos from the headquarters of IDF general Yair Naveh, revealing that he approved assassinations of unarmed Palestinian suspects in contravention of Israeli Supreme Court rulings.  Of course, when given a chance to support these ruling in practice, the Court refused to do so as is often the case with security matters in which it is loath to second guess the military-intelligence apparatus.

Reporters Without Borders recently wrote in protest to the Israeli Attorney General demanding that it drop the prosecution.  It pointed out that the law under which Blau was being prosecuted had never been used against a journalist in the past 50 years:

Ms. Kam['s]…four and a half year…sentence…[is a] very severe punishment [that] constitutes a clear warning to all journalists who use confidential documents as a basis for their reporting. It sends a disturbing signal for media freedom in Israel.

…All journalists receive and use classified documents. It is the basis of investigative reporting. Countless scandals and revelations of impropriety have come to light thanks to documents obtained without permission. In this case, only one question matters: was the information obtained in this manner of general interest? If it was, then media freedom takes precedence and the justice system must recognize the nature of the journalist’s work and refrain from prosecuting him.

In this case, the documents involved shed a vital light on the way the IDF was operating and, in particular, its targeted killings of Palestinian militants who could have been arrested. This violated a Supreme Court order…

This is not about endangering the country’s security. It is just a question of exercising one’s right to information about a state entity. Journalists are not above the law and army generals are not, either.

Reporters Without Borders would like to point out that article 113-c of the criminal code, under which Mr. Blau is charged, has never previously been used against a journalist at any time during the past 50 years. Convicting Mr. Blau would have very negative consequences for the image of Israel and would result in its being added to the list of countries that imprison journalists just for doing their work.

We therefore urge you to withdraw the charges against Mr. Blau. Investigative journalists are the cornerstone of transparency, which is essential if a society is to function in a democratic manner. They provide a vital service. Convicting him would do grave harm to the free flow of news and information.

I regret to have to add the addendum that in many cases Israeli generals are indeed above the law.  The fact that the Supreme Court refused to disqualify Naveh from a promotion to deputy chief of staff confirms this sad fact.

I call upon the Israeli press to publicize this travesty and American Jewish organizations to let the Israeli government know that this trial is a travesty and impermissible as far as Jews are concerned who live in Diaspora nations with a truly free press and who hold that Israeli democracy is a sacred value.

Dennis Ross Resigns

Thursday, November 10th, 2011

If I truly thought this meant a major change in Barack Obama’s Middle East approach I’d be rejoicing at the news that Dennis Ross was resigning as the president’s go-to guy for anything regarding the Israeli-Arab conflict.  He is one of the most pernicious influences in American policy going back decades.  His allegiance is clearly to the Israelis and he clearly sees the Palestinians and Arabs in general as authors of their own misery.  His approach to them has always been condescending as anyone can tell by reading the offers Mahmoud Abbas was entertaining from Israel and the U.S. in the Palestine Papers.

But the NY Times report, if true, indicates that Ross is leaving for personal, rather than policy reasons.  This indicates that Obama policy will remain in the rut it’s been stuck in for ages.  In fact, we can write off any major constructive intervention for the remainder of any Obama presidency.  Which means that the next war, whether in Iran, Syria, Gaza or Lebanon is just around the corner.  And when it breaks out we’ll have some Obama administration flack telling the world that Israel’s bombing of civilian targets will signify the birth pangs of democracy in the Middle East.  With any luck those words might be spoken by a Secretary of State who actually experienced the real suffering of real birth pangs, unlike Condi Rice, who never did.

I don’t know how the rest of the world will react to this news.  I can’t imagine it will motivate the Quartet or EU to take any new initiatives, which means the entire world is leaving it to two recalcitrant enemies to sort out their differences any which way they can–including by war if necessary.  I wonder whether this might tend to make the world more sympathetic to Palestinian inspired initiatives like the one for Palestinian statehood.  When a major power like the U.S. leaves a vacuum, other forces and factors come into play.  Most will be negative, but some may be sleepers and surprise us, like BDS or the statehood initiative.

This is a sad day because it means that while a negative influence is gone from U.S. policymaking, no one and nothing is taking his place.  This is the equivalent of benign neglect without the “benign.”

U.S. Miscalculates on IAEA Report: Russia Repudiates New Sanctions as “Instrument of Regime Change”

Thursday, November 10th, 2011

Russia has reminded the U.S. what happens when you stack the deck and then ask your opponent to pick a card: he might just upset the table and storm out of the room.  Russia did the equivalent when it dismissed the IAEA report on Iran’s nuclear program and rejected calls for further economic sanctions against that country, calling it a step toward “regime change”:

“The world community will see all additional sanctions against Iran as an instrument of regime change in Tehran,” Gennadi M. Gatilov, Russia’s deputy foreign minister, said in comments to the Interfax news agency. “This approach is unacceptable to us, and the Russian side does not intend to consider such a proposal.”

There are a number of issues bugging the Kremlin.  First, the IAEA rejected Russian and Chinese entreaties that the final report not include certain material that they deemed objectionable.  Second, the IAEA’s director, Yukio Amano is increasingly seen as a creature of the U.S. and Israel, thus rendering his credibility close to nil.  Third, the Russians are bridling at the pressure the U.S. and Israel are trying to exert on them to invoke draconian new sanctions.  Fourth, they can’t have enjoyed seeing a scientist, Vyacheslav Danilenko, who worked at one time in Russia deceitfully raked over the coals in the report.

When you put your relationship with a country under such pressure it’s only natural that it might break.  That’s what happened today.  The reaction may help quiet the braying dogs here and in Israel calling for a military attack.  If you can’t even get Russia and the Chinese to go for more sanctions imagine what they and others similarly disposed in the world community might do if Israel attacked Iran.

My only concern is that Israel may not care what anyone says or thinks.  It may go ahead with an attack and leave the U.S. to clean up the mess that will remain of the Russian relationship afterward.

IAEA Iran Report Unravels: Tainted Mossad Evidence Alleges Russian Scientist Aided Nuclear Weapons Research

Wednesday, November 9th, 2011

Gareth Porter has chased down a story that’s been bruited in the progressive web for the past 24 hours or so (his report is based in part on the stellar research of Moon of Alabama).  It begins the process of unraveling at least one major element of the IAEA report.  The UN document claims the Iranian race for nuclear weapons has been helped by a number of foreign scientists recruited by the regime for this purpose.  Everyone already knows about the role played by the Pakistani Khan network in Iran’s and North Korea’s efforts.  But a mysterious Russian scientist surfaced in a private briefing offered to the media by David Albright, a former U.S. nuclear inspector.

Albright claimed that Vyacheslav Danilenko was a Ukrainian (not Russian) nuclear scientist employed for five years by the Iranians to work on refining their nuclear designs.  The only problem?  Danilenko isn’t a nuclear scientist at all.  In fact, he’s one of the world’s leading experts on producing industrial (nano) diamonds using sophisticated explosives technology.  The reason why researchers or intelligence agencies may’ve thought the Russian was a nuclear scientist is that he trained at a Russian institute which does do research on nuclear warheads.

It is possible that Danilenko did help the Iranians with his own professional expertise because the country has a budding nanotechnology focus which includes an interest in nanodiamonds.  That would explain why the Russian was in Iran.  But it doesn’t in any way connect him specifically to Iran’s nuclear program.  The IAEA report does note the expert who helped the Iranians was using a cover as a nanodiamonds expert, but that his real purpose was to help with designing nukes:

The report states that the “foreign expert” was in Iran from 1996 to about 2002, “ostensibly to assist in the development of a facility and techniques for making ultra dispersed diamonds (UDDs) or nanodiamonds…” That wording suggests that nanodiamonds were merely a cover for his real purpose in Iran.

The report says the expert “also lectured on explosive physics and its applications”, without providing any further detail about what applications were involved.

Now, who might’ve offered this intelligence to the IAEA?  I’ll hazard a guess based on a very similar error committed in the case of Dirar Abusisi.  The Mossad offered the name of the alleged Ukrainian engineering professor who trained Abusisi in rocket technology.  The only problem was the name Israeli intelligence offered was a full name as it didn’t include the professor’s last name.  The actual faculty member Abusisi studied with had a different name and swore he never trained the Gazan in any other field than civil engineering (power plant technology).  I’d wager that an intelligence agency which can’t keep the names straight of various culprits who it’s trying to implicate in skullduggery would make the same mistake twice.

Further, the Mossad argued that Abusisi’s civil engineering studies were a cover for his real missile research carried out at a military institute in Kharkov (does that sound familiar?).  The only problem is that the military institute no longer existed by the time Abusisi arrived to study there.  The Mossad was never able to prove Abusisi took any courses in any field other than power plant operations.

The Danilenko misidentification also reminds me a bit of Gholam Shukari, the alleged Iranian Revolutionary Guard figure who supposedly conspired with Arbabsiar to kill the Saudi ambassador.  Former senior MEK officials have in fact identified Shukari as an MEK leader and not affiliated with the IRG.  Oops.

So I’m going to put my money on this information being offered by the Mossad.  If I’m right, then this would be at least the second similar error of its kind by the agency.  Which should, if there’s any justice in the world, torpedo their credibility along with the credibility of those in the IAEA who included such shoddy research in the final document.

An addendum: a few years ago the Mossad leaked a fraudulent Iranian research memo to the Times of London claiming to detail a nuclear trigger technology that would allow the Iranians to set off a nuclear device.  The only problem was Israel received the purported memo from its friends in the MEK, who passed it off as authentic.  It wasn’t.  Now the IAEA report talks about the same development of nuclear trigger technology, though it no longer relies on the patent fraud offered by the Mossad.

If Israeli intelligence offered the world fraudulent documents about Iran then, why wouldn’t it do so again?

Porter confirms my hunch about the Mossad’s involvement:

The unnamed member state that informed the agency about Danilenko’s alleged experience as a Soviet nuclear weapons scientist is almost certainly Israel, which has been the source of virtually all the purported intelligence on Iranian work on nuclear weapons over the past decade.

Israel has made no secret of its determination to influence world opinion on the Iranian nuclear programme by disseminating information to governments and news media, including purported Iran government documents. Israeli foreign ministry and intelligence officials told journalists Douglas Frantz and Catherine Collins about the special unit of Mossad dedicated to that task at the very time the fraudulent documents were being produced.

One thing I like about the Jerusalem Post compared to Haaretz is that the former can’t help but brag about Israeli initiatives which Haaretz would be sensible enough to realize are embarrassing to Israel.  So, for example, Haaretz reporting noted Israeli contributions to the IAEA final document but didn’t single it out for special attention.  The Post is proud of Israel’s role in cooking the books so to speak and Porter quotes Yaakov Katz, it’s security correspondent spilling the beans:

The Jerusalem Post’s Yaakov Katz reported Wednesday that Israeli intelligence agencies had “provided critical information used in the report“, the purpose of which was to “push through a new regime of sanctions against Tehran….”

While I’m not a fan of the Iranian regime by any stretch, their claims that the report is based on fraud and fabrications is bolstered by Porter’s important story.  And by God, no one should allow Israel or anyone else to go to war on account of flagrant deception such as the Mossad has offered.  In fact, we’ve seen this all before: anyone remember Niger yellowcake and the Iraqi mobile chemical warfare units Colin Powell displayed for all the world to see during his speech before the UN?  All fake.  And we went to war at least in part due to our credulousness about these lies.  Let’s not let the Mossad’s lies lead us down the same road again.

H/t to Facebook friend David Trimmel.

Performance Optimization WordPress Plugins by W3 EDGE