Mahzor

New York Public Library

Churches

Sarajevo Haggadah

Mah Nishtanah

Sarajevo haggadah

Antaea Darom

Israeli women's art

Action

Torah as music

Ben Heine

Action

ceramic bowl

Mohammad Said Kalash, "Offering Reconciliation" exhibit (photo: Ilan Amihai)

Action

Punch and Judy/Pinchas and Jamila

Avi Katz

Action

David Grossman

Ben Heine

Action

Eldrige Street shul

Lower East Side

Action

Dove

Ben Heine

Action

Two birds

Hoda Jamal

Action

Israeli and Palestinian boys

from documentary, Promises

Action

Cat in the Hat

Yiddish version

Action

Daylight through the Wall

Banksy: graffiti art on Separation Wall

Action

Maurice Sendak's Brundibar set

New Victory Theater (photo: Nan Melville/NYT)

Action

Daniel Barenboim, West-Eastern Divan Orchestra

Palestinian-Israeli musical ensemble (photo: Kerstin Joensson/AP)

Action

Great Day on Eldrige Street

N.Y.'s klezmer greats celebrate shul rededication (photo: Leo Sorel)

Action

Joint Appeal for Peace

(Avi Katz)

Joint Appeal for Peace

Ketubah, Ancona, Italy (1772)

(Jewish Theological Seminary library)

Ancona ketubah

Archive for June, 2011

Robert Gates, America’s Dagan, Prevented U.S. Attack on Iran

Saturday, June 18th, 2011

Robert Gates, preparing to step down from his job as secretary of defense, has spoken for the first time about his severe doubts about the U.S. wars in Iraq & Afghanistan.  Gates is reputed to have also opposed U.S. support for the Libya intervention.

What struck me especially in this article was this statement that could’ve been lifted out of Meir Dagan’s testimony against Israel’s plans to attack Iran:

Mr. Gates was asked to confirm reports of policy duels during the two years before Mr. Bush and Vice President Dick Cheney left office, a time in which he was said to have been successful in altering policies or blocking missions that might have escalated into another conflict.

“The only thing I guess I would say to that is: I hope I’ve prevented us from doing some dumb things over the past four and a half years — or maybe dumb is not the right word, but things that were not actually in our interest,” Mr. Gates said.

…Some of the defense secretary’s confidants…confirmed that Mr. Gates prevented provocative, adventurist policies against Iran, in particular, that might have spun into war.

…“I also think that he prevented further adventures, particularly in our relationship with countries like Iran, that could have turned into military intervention had he not become secretary of defense,” said [former U.S. Senator David] Boren, who is now president of the University of Oklahoma. “I think that he stepped us back from a policy of brinkmanship.”

This news makes me believe that the red-light that George Bush gave to Ehud Olmert when he visited Washington asking for permission to attack Iran was due in no small part to the opposition of Gates.  He was one of the sole sane figures in the administration who stood against the cries for war of Cheney and the war camp.  It makes you wonder what might’ve happened if Gates had been defense secretary in 2003 instead of Donald Rumsfeld.

Dagan used almost precisely the same language to describe Bibi Netanyahu’s would-be Iranian adventurism.  He called the idea of an attack on Iran, “dumb.”  And almost the same scenario is portrayed in the Israeli press when Dagan attended a fateful meeting of senior ministers who had the power to authorize war against Iran.  It was the then Mossad chief who almost single-handedly persuaded enough of the ministers to vote No, so that Bibi and Barak’s plans had to be scuttled.

Nakba: They Will Return

Saturday, June 18th, 2011
nakba photo

Nakba

I’m shamelessly ripping off a deeply moving photo-poetry collage by Patrick McManus, one of my Facebook friends, which I came across in my online wanderings.  The poem (full poem here) exquisitely echoes the photograph:

Abu Salma: We Will Return (1951)

Beloved Palestine, how do I sleep
while the spectrum of torture is in my eyes?
I purify the world with your name
and if your love did not tire me out,
I would’ve kept my feelings a secret.

The caravans of days pass and talk about
the conspiracy of enemies and friends
Beloved Palestine! How do I live
away from your plains and mounds?

One thing to keep in mind about this photo is that it could just as easily be Arab Jewish refugees or any refugee anywhere in the Middle East.  But in this case, it is Palestinian Nakba refugees.  And can we ignore the pathos, ignore the tenderness, ignore the sadness, ignore the injustice?  Only at our peril.

Look at the face of this beautiful little girl.  So pure.  So attentive to her grandfather.  What did this suffering do to her?  What did she become?  Where is she now?  And when, if ever, will she return?

Thanks to reader, Rupa Shah, for her help providing biographical information on the poet.

Top Ten Fun Names for IDF Interdiction Operation Against Gaza Flotilla

Friday, June 17th, 2011

I offer the following in the spirit of hangman’s humor preceding what I hope will be a safe passage for all my friends on the various boats of the Gaza flotilla.

The IDF, like all military organizations gives names to every operation it executes.  Its planned piracy on the high seas against the upcoming Gaza flotilla is probably no exception.  I thought we’d tear a page from David Letterman’s book and suggest a list of Top Ten (actually it’s bar mitzvah 13, but who’s counting) suggested names for this high seas fiesta.  Here’s your chance to devise some new ones.  The winner will get to ride with the lead IDF zodiac intercepting the first flotilla ship:

Operation Bleeding Heart

Operation Don’t Menschen It

Operation Samaritan Smackdown

Operation Quick & the Dead

Operation Eternal Victim

Operation Let’s Get it Over With

Operation Finish the Job

Operation No Humanitarian Crisis

Operation Mavi Marmara-You’re So Over

Operation Let’s Talk Turkey

Operation IHH-I Hate Hamas

Operation Hot Lead

Operation Lead Balloon

And from Helena Cobban: Operation Ungrateful Dead (you’re showing your age, dear Helena).

Thanks to an anonymous reader for the concept.

Doctor Who Collaborated With Mossad Commits Suicide

Friday, June 17th, 2011

dr yonah elian

Dr. Yonah Elian, conscience-stricken for allowing Mossad to exploit his medical knowledge (Yediot Achronot)

Tonight I’m going to tell a sad story, but an instructive one.  It begins with the tragic news that an 88 year-old retired Israeli doctor, respected in his profession for many decades, committed suicide in his Ramat Aviv apartment.  The man’s son said his father had been very sick, so it is no surprise that the doctor took his life.  So far there is nothing unusual in this story.  Until you begin to unravel the man’s history.

He was Dr. Yonah Elian, for two decades the Mossad’s favorite doctor, the man they took along on delicate operations in which they required an anesthesiologist to sedate a victim who was to be kidnapped or otherwise incapacitated.  Elian worked especially closely with Rafi Eitan, one of Israel’s storied spymasters who captured Eichmann and less heroically, “ran” Jonathan Pollard.  The doctor was part of the team that kidnapped Eichman in Argentina and sedated him so that they could transport him back to Israel where he was later executed.

Elian also inadvertently killed one of the Mossad’s targets on one of these missions.  In 1954, the Mossad got word that an Israeli engineer, Capt. Alexander “Avner” Israel, was offering military secrets to the Egyptians in Europe.  Dubbing it Operation Bren (p. 4 ff.), they hastily dispatch a team to kidnap him and bring him back to Israel to stand trial for treason.  The team found their quarry quickly through the use of a “honeypot” female agent (shades of Mordechai Vanunu) who lured him to a romantic Paris rendezvous.  Then Elian sedated him and the victim was hustled off to an Israeli military transport plane.  Unfortunately, the plane had to make several refueling stops and each time he was sedated anew.  Apparently this anesthesiologist didn’t realize there were limits to how much sedation a human being could take and he gave the man an overdose and he died.

When the plane landed and they discovered they’d killed him they decided there should be no evidence left behind.  To accomplish the cover-up, they promptly took off once again and dumped the body in the Mediterranean Sea.  Isser Harel, then Mossad chief, never told the victim’s family a word about the man’s death.  No compensation was ever offered for the murder.  As Prof. Shlomo Spiro wrote in a paper on the subject of ethics[!] in the field of Israeli intelligence:

The Mossad then obliterated every reference to the man in Israeli official files, and the case kept secret for five decades.  Generations of Mossad officers heard rumors of this failed operation, many knew the details, but nothing was done to inform Alexander’s family or provide for their support.

In those days, Israeli intelligence could obliterate such a failure and so avoid scandal.  Not so today, though God knows it tries.

In his comments about Dr. Elian, Rafi Eitan lied when he said that the doctor never compromised his Hippocratic Oath. Of course he did.  Certainly when he killed the IDF officer, but arguably even when he helped capture Eichmann.  Yes, you may argue that Eichmann was one of the world’s great mass murderers and that anything that could be done to apprehend him should be done.  But a doctor lives by a different professional standard.  And a doctor may not use his medical expertise in a way that will lead to the death of a patient.

I wonder what Dr. Elian thought of these moral conundrums with which he lived when he died.  If he had any he rarely expressed them.  Even to his family.  But several years before his death, Dr. Elian did tell his son (Hebrew) that he was terribly conflicted about what he’d done to Eichmann because it violated his Hippocratic oath.  Every attempt by the family to remind him of the significance of bringing the great Nazi monster to justice fell on death ears, the son recounts.

When the Knesset attempted to give Dr. Elian a certificate of appreciation for his service to the country, he would only accept it anonymously and would not attend the ceremony himself.  He sent his son in his place.

The doctor’s son also tells the strange story of how he parted with his father before he left for the Eichmann operation.  Dr. Elian woke his twins and told them he would be away on business in Eilat for a few days.  Over a week later he returned with a gift–a toy pistol with an ivory handle.  The son remembers marveling at the gift and thinking what wonderful things they had in Eilat!

Despite this, one can tell that this was a man of depth, subtlety and nuance.  A man who realized the moral contradictions of the life he lived.  A man haunted by ghosts.  This is everything that today’s Israel is not.  Today’s Israel has no moral doubts.  It only has certainties.  As a result it can do much more damage than Dr. Elian.  At least he stopped his service to the Mossad when Rafi Eitan ceased his role as chief of operations for the Mossad.

Certainly, I can’t argue that a man who lived out a long life was thinking of the ways he failed his professional oath as he took his life.  After all, if this was highest in his mind he might’ve done so earlier.  Likely, a terminal illness served as the motivating force for his last act.  But still…

This story takes on added significance in light of the knowledge that U.S. doctors have collaborated with the CIA and military intelligence in the interrogation and torture of Al Qaeda suspects, thus violating their Hippocratic Oath.  This has led to various professional organizations condemning exploitation of their profession for the sake of intelligence gathering.

In fact, the Israeli Medical Association has taken a similar stand here.  But there remain numerous reports (and here) of doctors who betray the ethics of their profession in service to the spymasters and torturers.  At least Dr. Elian had the good conscience to regret his collaboration.

The Mysterious San Remo Treaty, Hasbarists’ Delight

Friday, June 17th, 2011

Whenever Israel gets itself into serious hot water and kills a lot of people and looks really bad in the process, if it can, the MFA and the rest of the hasbara brigade goes into overdrive, dusts off all the possible avenues of defense they can find.  Lately, with the Gaza flotilla shortly to embark on its attempt to break the illegal Israeli blockade of Gaza, and with memories fresh in the world’s mind of the nine dead bodies shot at point blank range by Israeli naval commandos, hasbarists are turning to an obscure international treaty to defend the indefensible: the collective punishment of 1.5 million Gazans by Israel’s armed forces.

I’m so tired to hearing these chirping hasbarists crickets all singing the same song (I must’ve had six different commenters in the past year who each separately raised San Remo as justification for the blockade) that I wanted to thank a commenter who pointed me to a rebuttal of the San Remo argument.  It was written by a former British ambassador, Craig Murray.  And before you question his credentials, let’s present them:

…Former Head of the Maritime Section of the Foreign and Commonwealth Office. He negotiated the UK’s current maritime boundaries with Ireland, Denmark (Faeroes), Belgium and France, and boundaries of the Channel Islands, Turks and Caicos and British Virgin Islands. He was alternate Head of the UK Delegation to the UN Preparatory Commission on the Law of the Sea. He was Head of the FCO Section of the Embargo Surveillance Centre, enforcing sanctions on Iraq, and directly responsible for clearance of Royal Navy boarding operations in the Persian Gulf.

I quote Ambassador Murray in full (italics are mine):

Why San Remo Does Not Apply

Every comments thread on every internet site on the world which has discussed the Israeli naval murders, has been inundated by organised ZIonist commenters stating that the Israeli action was legal under the San Remo Manual of International Law Applicable to Armed Conflicts at Sea.

They ignore those parts of San Remo that specifically state that it is illegal to enforce a general blockade on an entire population. But even apart from that, San Remo simply does not apply.

The manual relates specifically to legal practice in time of war. With whom is Israel at war?

There is no war.

Israeli apologists have gone on to say they are in a state of armed conflict with Gaza.

Really? In that case, why do we continually hear Israeli complaints about rockets fired from Gaza into Israel? If it is the formal Israeli position that it is in a state of armed conflict with Gaza, then Gaza has every right to attack Israel with rockets.

But in fact, plainly to the whole world, the nature and frequency of Israeli complaints about rocket attacks gives evidence that Israel does not in fact believe that a situation of armed conflict exists.

Secondly, if Israel wishes to claim it is in a state of armed conflict with Gaza, then it must treat all of its Gazan prisoners as prisoners of war entitled to the protections of the Geneva Convention. If you are in a formal state of armed conflict, you cannot categorise your opponents as terrorists.

But again, it is plain for the world to see from its treatment and description of Gazan prisoners that it does not consider itself to be in a formal position of armed conflict.

Israel is seeking to pick and choose which bits of law applicable to armed conflict it applies, by accepting or not accepting it is in armed conflcit depending on the expediency of the moment.

I have consistently denounced Hamas rocket attacks into Israel. I have categorised them as terrorism. If Israel wishes now to declare it is in armed conflcit with Gaza, I withdraw my opposition and indeed would urge Hamas to step up such attacks to the maximum.

Does Israel really wish to justify its latest action by declaring it is at war with Gaza? That is what the invocation of San Remo amounts to.

So please no more references to San Remo.  It’s a red herring argument.

Lying IDF Generals: ‘Israeli Blockade Recognized Under International Law’

Friday, June 17th, 2011

Free Gaza, support the flotilla, end the Israeli siege

Free Gaza, support the flotilla, end the Israeli siege

Remember that old screed attacking Rush Limbaugh: Lies and the Lying Liars Who Tell them? Well, IDF Brig. Gen. Yoav Mordechai seems to have studied the book and learned all its lessons down cold.  He threatened mayhem on the unarmed activists who are about to depart on the Gaza flotilla boats for Occupied Palestine.  But what was most mendacious in his remarks was this:

“There is an unequivocal directive from the government to enforce the naval blockade that is recognized by international law, and we will not allow it to be broken.”

Just who recognizes the legality of Israel’s siege of Gaza’s 1.5 million civilians?  Why, the IDF of course.  But since when is the IDF or any similar Israeli source the sole arbiter of international law?  Are there any other non-hasbarist legal analysts who defend the Israeli siege as legal under international law?  Besides Alan Dershowitz, of course.  I haven’t heard any.

So let’s be very clear: this tin-pot general has just threatened unarmed civilians with the use of any and all means necessary to subdue them.  This is hooliganism and brutishness.  And Israel can surely be proud it has such a general in its midst.  One who isn’t afraid to shoot men and women if necessary to uphold the nation’s honor.

Israel and most military bodies like to give names to their exercises.  I’ve got one for the upcoming flotilla interdiction.  And for this, we’ll have to turn Meir Kahane’s “Never Again” slogan on its head.  My suggestion: “Mavi Marmara–Again.”  Or alternatively, we could use a version of the slogan that Auschwitz survivor Malvina Schwartz saw scrawled on a wall in her Hungarian hometown after she came back from the camps: “This time–we’ll finish the job.”

Ethan Bronner interprets the bellicosity of Brig. Gen. Mordechai this way:

The statements seemed part of a heightened effort to stop another flotilla and to pre-emptively explain Israel’s position if violence ensues.

I’d make one small change in that sentence: “when violence ensues.”  Because the IDF of course controls whether there will be murder and mayhem, just as it did a year ago on the Mavi Marmara, when it slaughtered nine men with ‘kill shots’ at point-blank range.

And hey, we can’t get away with writing about a Bronner piece without noting his bias in favor of Israel:

Israel…said that a year ago the ship was dominated by extremists who created the confrontations that resulted in the deaths.

“Israel said?”  What about what everyone else in the world said, which directly contradicts this?  And what about an acknowledgement that whatever the passengers did, they did not, could not provoke nine murders.  That was solely the doing of the IDF naval commandos.  Not a word on this from Good Soldier Bronner (oh, that’s right, it’s his son who’s in the IDF).

And how about a little more hasbara from the Times IDF (er, Israel) bureau chief:

Israel began a naval blockade two and a half years ago when it invaded Gaza to stop Palestinian militants from firing rockets into Israel.

Say what?  First this is erroneous.  There was a full Israeli blockade of Gaza, including naval, beginning in 2006, not 2009.  Second, the reasons Israel says it’s doing something are often not the real reasons it’s doing it.  In this case, the blockade, if this was the purpose, never stopped a single rocket from being fired.  Rather, Israel wished to punish Gazans for voting for Hamas to be their leader and to punish Hamas for its pre-emptive coup which kicked Fatah out of the enclave in 2006.  That’s the real reason there is an Israeli siege.  One which, contrary to the word of an Israeli hack general, is illegal under international law.

How about this bit of breathless Bronnerism:

Today Gaza has plenty of goods available…

For God’s sake, what does it mean that there are “plenty of goods available” if there are no jobs with which people can earn money to buy them?  This is the heartlessness of Ethan Bronner.  Besides, most of those goods didn’t come to Gaza through Israeli crossings which allow a trickle to flow in.  Rather they’re smuggled in via Egypt.  No thanks to Israel.

Bronner gets yet another point wrong in this passage:

The government says its goal is to prevent Hamas from importing weapons by sea. In March, Israel stopped a vessel packed with weapons that it says were Gaza-bound.

No,  the vessel wasn’t bound for Gaza.  It was actually taken on the high seas on its way to Egypt.  It’s possible the weapons were intended for Gaza, but that ship wasn’t bringing them there.

Bronner continues his whitewash of the Mavi Marmara massacre thus:

This year an Israeli commission concluded that the blockade conformed with international law, as did Israel’s raid on the Mavi Marmara in international waters. The panel included two foreign legal experts who agreed with the conclusions.

First, Bronner neglects to mention the clear bias of the panel, the fact that it was not independent, did not have subpoena power, and had a very limited mandated.  Not to mention that it’s nearly senile 89-year-old chairman died a few weeks into deliberations.  Second, the two foreign “experts” were neither experts nor unbiased.  David Trimble is not an expert on international law, but rather a Northern Ireland pro-Israel politician.  The other expert was a Canadian military judge advocate whose expertise on international law was never promoted by the Israelis.

Enough badgering poor old ‘Eitan’ Bronner.  Let’s go back to the IDF military spokesperson who’s always good for a cynical laugh:

He said that many of those planning to take part in the flotilla were peace activists, but that they were naïve because “extremists will set the tone” if Israeli commandos board the ships.

Yes, indeed.  The tone will be set by extremists like 86 year-old Holocaust survivor Hedy Epstein; or non-violent human rights activist Medea Benjamin; or by Yonatan Shapira, the peace activist who refused to bomb Palestinians in the West Bank with his IDF Black Hawk helicopter.  These are the caliber of man-eating extremists those commandos will be facing.  Scary.  They better take along an extra copy of Gandhi’s biography in order to do battle with them.

To support the sacred work of the Gaza flotilla and tell the IDF you won’t support vigilantism, you may contribute to the Canadian boat, Tahrir, which will include Tikun Olam reader Mary Hughes Thompson among its passengers.  Godspeed, Mary and all the others.  Come back safe.

IDF Planning for Syrian War

Thursday, June 16th, 2011

Perhaps in a move designed to warn the Syrian regime that it’s playing with fire if it continues allowing Nakba-Naksa style protests on the Golan Heights armistice line, the IDF website publicized an annual war game exercise which simulates war with Syria.  It’s armored and engineering forces massed to mimic a Golan Heights attack on Syria and, according to the canned army-speak “accomplished [a more precise, and telling translation would be "conquered"] their objectives.”  I don’t think a single soldier or commander asked himself what he would do once he reached Damascus, thus achieving his objective.  Would Israel then set up a puppet regime and create new settlements even closer to Damascus?  Perhaps Israel would bring a new democratic regime to Syria (à la Bush in Iraq), that is currently in the throes of rebellion?

A similar simulated war was conducted last year which I covered here.

What follows is a summary of the Hebrew version of the article, with but a small amount of “interpretation” interpolated by yours truly.

The story begins with a loving account of how the presence of an officer injured in the recent Nakba Day protests rallied the troops.  No, not shot, injured by stone throwers, those wicked assassins.  There was a chair for the wounded soldier’s resting foot and a worried doctor, but the officer treated it all as if nothing had happened.  And of course there’s the requisite heroics about how during the Nakba Day “fight” the injured commander refused a medic’s attentions and only when the storm of battle was ended did he consent to treatment.  And this dedication to the mission aroused nothing but admiration in the beating hearts of his men (of course).

Not a word about the 15 unarmed Syria-Palestinian demonstrators who were mowed down by IDF bullets.

IsraelinUSA's (Israeli Embassy) latest tweet...need we say more?

Another “lightly wounded” officer describes (erroneously I might add) being confronted by “thousands” of Syrian demonstrators and quickly feeling “surrounded.”  Of course he doesn’t mention that the IDF forces were quite distant from the victims when they opened fire.  Otherwise, you might think that this was hand-to-hand combat like Jim Bowie at the Alamo.  He continues (almost certainly exaggerating once more) that rocks rained down on his comrades for half an hour and that this tested their mettle as IDF soldiers, reminding them of why they trained.  Yessir, one of the world’s allegedly finest fighting forces lives to face down stone-throwing Syrians and perform other acts of national deliverance on behalf of Israel and the Jewish people.

In a similar development, the Israeli navy has been practicing as well for its planned abduction of the human rights activists aboard the Gaza flotilla boats soon to set sail for Gaza.  The military is telling the world media that every precaution will be taken to keep injuries to a minimum.  Why there should be any is beyond me.  Since nine were murdered last time, I suppose anything less would be a blessing (though given the mayhem in the Golan this may be wishful thinking).

In case any of you are wondering what the Israeli Embassy is tweeting just about now, of course they’re telling us about the stellar U.S. basketball talent that’s headed to…no, not Gaza, silly.  But to good old Israel, of course.

CIA Participated in Smear Campaign Against Juan Cole

Thursday, June 16th, 2011
glenn carle

Glenn Carle, former CIA officer, resisted White House efforts to investigate Juan Cole (Stephen Crowley/NYT)

In 2006, I wrote about a nasty smear campaign mounted against Juan Cole, who’d been nominated for a prestigious endowed chair in history at Yale. Jewish pro-Israel alumni and right-wing blogs trumpeted Cole’s alleged anti-Semitic utterances and his supposed hatred for Israel.  The campaign worked.  While his appointment was approved by the department, through an unprecedented intervention it was eventually scuttled and he returned happily to his position teaching at the University of Michigan.

Now, the NY Times’ James Risen reports a U.S. intelligence official was dragooned into a CIA investigation involving Cole in an attempt to find out embarrassing information about him that could damage his reputation.  The official notes there were at least two separate attempts to do this which he frustrated each time.  It is, of course, illegal for the CIA to investigate U.S. citizens.  Which seems to me to give Juan a built-in lawsuit.  I’d give up on a Congressional investigation since the Obama administration seems almost as backward on national security as the Bush administration was.

What the article doesn’t reveal is who in the U.S. government initiated the request for an investigation of Cole.  It seems clear to me that this would not have come from the CIA itself.  In fact, the official reveals that the discussions began after his boss came back from a White House meeting.  My money of course is on the devil himself, Dick Cheney.  This is the part of the story I’d like to see expanded.  I’m hoping Juan has filed an FOIA request, though if Cheney was smart he wouldn’t have left any fingerprints that would lead directly back to him.  It’s just too damn bad he can’t sue Cheney himself if he’s the culprit.

An equally intriguing question would be whether members of the Republican pro-Israel Jewish community and/or the Israeli government were interested in this little adventure.  They certainly would’ve been able to get Cheney’s ear.  So the question, if Cheney was the initiator, would be whether he thought this up himself or the issue was brought to him by others.  And if so, whom.

Performance Optimization WordPress Plugins by W3 EDGE