Mahzor

New York Public Library

Churches

Sarajevo Haggadah

Mah Nishtanah

Sarajevo haggadah

Antaea Darom

Israeli women's art

Action

Torah as music

Ben Heine

Action

ceramic bowl

Mohammad Said Kalash, "Offering Reconciliation" exhibit (photo: Ilan Amihai)

Action

Punch and Judy/Pinchas and Jamila

Avi Katz

Action

David Grossman

Ben Heine

Action

Eldrige Street shul

Lower East Side

Action

Dove

Ben Heine

Action

Two birds

Hoda Jamal

Action

Israeli and Palestinian boys

from documentary, Promises

Action

Cat in the Hat

Yiddish version

Action

Daylight through the Wall

Banksy: graffiti art on Separation Wall

Action

Maurice Sendak's Brundibar set

New Victory Theater (photo: Nan Melville/NYT)

Action

Daniel Barenboim, West-Eastern Divan Orchestra

Palestinian-Israeli musical ensemble (photo: Kerstin Joensson/AP)

Action

Great Day on Eldrige Street

N.Y.'s klezmer greats celebrate shul rededication (photo: Leo Sorel)

Action

Joint Appeal for Peace

(Avi Katz)

Joint Appeal for Peace

Ketubah, Ancona, Italy (1772)

(Jewish Theological Seminary library)

Ancona ketubah

Archive for May, 2011

Did U.S. Execute Osama bin Laden?

Tuesday, May 3rd, 2011

The killing of Osama bin Laden is beginning to look like little more than a standard IDF targeted killing.  Initially, the Obama administration clearly stated that bin Laden was armed and resisted.  Now, the account has been radically revised.  He wasn’t armed, but ‘resisted’ in some unspecified way.  There is only one way to satisfy speculation in this matter.  They have to release documentary footage of the moment of his killing to allow people to judge for themselves what happened.  Not the pictures of his dead body, which they weighting the release of now.  Given the radical discrepancies, it’s no longer a situation in which we can take the government’s word for what happened.

If Bin Laden resisted violently I would have no problem with his killing.  If he resisted passively, there surely are ways to disable someone without killing them as they did his wife, who they shot in the leg but did not kill.

In the situation of Israeli targeted killings and anti-terror operations, the victims are often killed either in bed or unarmed.  While there is always a claim that violent resistance was offered, the evidence often does not support this.  That is why the Bin Laden operation is beginning to sound suspiciously like an IDF one.

I’m rapidly coming to the conclusion that this was simply an execution, not an apprehension.  And that it was always intended to be an execution, contrary to what the government told us when they said they were prepared to capture him if he didn’t resist violently.

The fact too that Bin Laden’s body was buried almost immediately at sea seems deeply strange to me.  Why do you so fear someone’s dead body that you make it disappear?  Not to mention that disposing of his earthly remains in such a way would be a deep offense even to those many Muslims who despise Bin Laden.  This is more or less what the Russians did to Hitler’s remains.  They wanted to leave no trace of him for his supporters to worship.  As a result, the way they disappeared his body will become a bone of contention for years and decades to come.

I didn’t fear Bin Laden alive and I don’t fear him dead.  We are better and stronger than anything he represented.  But when we execute our enemies and disappear their remains we aren’t behaving much better than they do.

On a completely different subject, I’ve wondered why those who built this compound for Bin Laden didn’t build a panic room that couldn’t be penetrated by the type of force which invaded it and ended up killing him.  If he had retreated to such a sealed bunker he could’ve waited out the onslaught and the arrival of Pakistani forces, who might’ve ended it and forced the U.S. forces to retreat.  Did Al Qaeda not think that such an assault was possible?  If so, they were guilty of hubris.  I’m not suggesting this because I particularly wanted to protect Bin Laden or see him saved.  If the Pakistanis had captured him his fate might not have been much different.  But I’m just curious about the thinking of those who protected Bin Laden and why something that occurred to me didn’t occur to them.

Moti Fogel to Speak With Bereaved Palestinian on Yom HaZikaron

Tuesday, May 3rd, 2011
moti fogel

Moti Fogel, pictured while grieving for his murdered brother, Udi (Emil Salman)

Moti Fogel, whose older brother Udi was murdered in Itamar with his wife and children a few weeks ago, plans to speak at an alternative commemoration of Israel’s Yom Ha-Zikaron alongside a bereaved Palestinian woman, Siyam Abu Awad.  Abu Awad’s brother, Yousef, was killed by IDF fire in 2000 in a village near Hebron.

The event is sponsored by the Israeli NGO Combatants for Peace, whose members are veterans who’ve fought on both sides of the conflict.  They will be joined in the ceremony by Israeli and Palestinian families who’ve lost loved ones to the fighting, along with artists from both sides.  Fogel hopes that he can move forward the goals of dialogue, reconciliation and non-violence for both Israelis and those living under the PA.

Combatants for Peace leader Asher Wishnitzer says that the purpose of its commemoration is to transform the suffering and loss experienced by those living with the Israeli-Palestinian conflict so that we can struggle with it together.  Usually the bereavement builds walls, close off and distance people from one another.  But we want to deal with this together.  War is not something fated, but rather a human choice.

Abu Awad denounced the killings in Itamar and called them a “crime.”  She called for non-violence in pursuing the claims on both sides, and added that while the IDF soldier who killed her brother is not welcome in her home, she would invite him to meet her brother’s orphaned children and the rest of his family to determine whether the shots that killed him were appropriate or not.

I’m overcome by emotion and gratitude that Moti Fogel is able to overcome his grief and reach out in such a constructive way to both Israelis and Palestinians alike.  It cannot be an easy thing he is doing.

Israeli Women Ask Judge Sagi Why He’s Silenced Them in Even Rape Case

Monday, May 2nd, 2011

Rotem Cohen and Lian Ram have created a powerful short documentary film about the repression of sexual violence in Israeli society.  Yulie Cohen wrote this powerful note addressed to Judge Benny Sagi, who granted a gag order protecting the identity of accused rapist, Yoav Even, from being disclosed in the Israeli media:

I turn to you in this personal way because it seems that lately you’ve taken up a case which features a charge of rape.  Due to the gag order, very little is known to me.  But I have a growing fear that the file might be closed by you without the public having any idea why.  I would like to trust that you do fulfill your responsibilities faithfully toward men and women alike.  But I’d like to remind you that most of the women who suffer sexual violence do not report it because they know that the likelihood that justice will see the light of day is low.

Please, your honor, in your decisions, call upon the women of Israel to continue to file such complaints and not to fear that a man does not see their pain.

Thanking you in advance,

Yulie (a woman and mother of two young girls)

My friend, Dena Shunra has translated the Hebrew captions for the documentary. If Yulie or someone can add these captions to the video itself it would make a very powerful statement for English-speaking viewers:

Timestamp

text

0:07

1979: CEDAW – Israel ratifies the Convention for the Eradication of Discrimination Against Women, in any form

0:21

1999-2005 Approximately 54,630 calls were made to the help hotlines relating to sex crimes

0:27

Only 33,871 sex crime cases were opened by the police during those years

0:44

Only about 22% of those who contact the help hotlines go on to file a complaint with the police.

0:47

Which indicates a number of attacks which is double that reflected in police data

1:01

1996-2005: 46,790 sex crimes cases were opened by the police.

1:06

Of these, only 6,986 ended up with a conviction.

1:16

This means that only about 15% of the cases opened end up with convictions

1:26

The Israeli justice system convicts about 98% of cases prosecuted

1:32

Thus, nearly 85% of sex crime cases do not come to trial

1:47

Of every ten women hurt – two get to bring their case before a judge

2:01

[Chart] Rape cases in Israel, 1999-2005

Convictions, police complaints, contacts with help hotlines

3:10

At this time, our lips our sealed in solidarity

3:15

With those who cannot shout out the reckless strategy taken by the State with their own cases

3:42

Find us on FaceBook and join us in a silence that speaks volumes.

3:51

Mitpakdot: We Stand Up and Are Counted

 

 

 

 

Israeli Border Policewoman as Stone-Cold Killer

Monday, May 2nd, 2011
shani sevilia

Shani Sevilia: portrait of Israeli Border Policewoman as stone-cold killah

A new expose of Israeli police brutality and torture exploded yesterday with reports that a member of a special Border Police unit, Shani Sivilia, had been accused of torturing a Palestinian boy in March 2010, by cocking and pretending to fire her pistol into his head at close range, all in response the ‘deadly’ act of his possessing three firecrackers.  While the charges brought against her were shocking enough, even worse was the discovery by Israeli journalist, Ido Kenan, of her Facebook page, which is replete with the feverish product of what Ido cinematically calls “Dangerous Mind.”  Kenan has published a version of this in Yediot.

Yesterday, I wrote about the specific charges brought against her by the police special affairs unit.  Today, we’ll examine the contents of her formerly publicly accessible Facebook page (now private).  There are a number of interesting themes running through this material which it’s worth paying close attention to.  First, Sivilia is a Mizrahit.  As such, she clearly feels a profound need to separate herself from the Palestinians who, if she saw her own image in the mirror, she would resemble.  But there is a desperate need among some Israeli Jews of Arab origin to say: “We’re not like them.  We’re better than them.”  This phenomenon, of course, is not restricted to Israel.  This happens in all societies in which there are waves of immigration and the penultimate ethnic newcomer seeks to distinguish itself from the most recent wave, which is at the very bottom of the social status pyramid.  In this country, Germans said the same about Italians and the Irish and all of them said the same about African-Americans and even about Jews.  You always bash the guy who’s one rung below you.

Sivilia clearly hates Arabs and leftists.  But she reserves her greatest scorn and most apoplectic rage against what we might call “race-mixing:” Jewish women dating Arab men.  The language she reserves for such women is the harshest of all you’ll see in her Facebook profile.  In this, she is embracing the campaign of far-right nationalist rabbis against racial mingling between Jews and Arabs, including the field of sexual relations, commerce (no employment of Arab men by Jewish businesses), and housing (no renting to Arabs).

It doesn’t seem that Sivilia herself is religious (after all, one of her Facebook “Likes” is The Land of Milk, Alcohol, Honey and Drugs”).  But her own prejudices overlap quite comfortably with those of the nationalist religious right and therefore it’s comfortable for her to take up religious imagery and phrasing in her comments.  As a Mizrahit, she considers herself not religious, but “traditional.”  In other words, someone for whom religion is comfortable without it turning into full-fledge Haredi-style religious observance.

In September 2010, she writes in Facebook:

Happy [Yom] Kippur to all.  Surely, all the kids are going to the main drag (or “downtown”) to throw stones at Arabs.

In November 2010, Sevilia is released from her army service (which she appears to have served in the Border Police if I’m correct).  This commendation to her from a friend sounds much more ominous in light of the accusations levelled against her:

At this wonderful time, the citizens and State of Israel thank you for your service and the sense of security you provided us.

shani sevilia facebook screenshot

Shani Sevilia calls for flaying the skin off Jewish women who consort with Arab men and dumping their bodies in Dead Sea for a 'salt bath'

In December 2010, the accused torturer writes on her Facebook page:

Fuck the world, another incident in which two Arabs stabbed [Jewish] girls, right by my house!  Fuck your mothers you sons of whores!!  Sons of whores…them and anyone who likes them.  May God repay them.

When a Facebook Friend writes:

Any [Jewish] girl who goes out with Arabs should die.

Sivilia replies (and again keep in mind the acts of torture she’s being charged with):

You just now figured this out??  They should flay the skin from their bodies and cast them in the Dead [Salt] Sea.

In January 2011, the accused transfers to a private (civilian) company used by the Israeli State to provide security in the Territories.  Here she will continue with the same duties she performed while in the Border Police.  She completes a special course, is equipped with a weapon and writes the following:

Completed the special course.  Now back to the Territories with a vengeance!

In February 2011, Sivilia is still consumed with matters of love and death between Jewish girls and Arab men.  She recommends that a documentary created by an Israeli group which warns that the Arabs are using sex as a weapon to overwhelm Israel’s Jewish population.  She declares the video should be distributed as widely as possible through social networking sites:

Every daughter of a whore who goes out with Arab men, they should torture her body!

I have no more curses left in me.  The most important thing is that they [Jewish women] should suffer before they kill them.

On February 27th, the security contractor writes of her pride in being called a “Nazi” while doing checkpoint duty:

Yesterday, someone called me a ‘Nazi.’  From my point of view, ‘good job!’

On April 27th, she curses the Sheikh Jarrah activists because they disrespected her:

God take [kill] these leftists.

When a friend responds that even God doesn’t want them. Sivilia says well, “He promised me that he would consider it.”

In his article, Ido Kenan notes that the investigation against her had no bearing on the security work she performed.  Just a day before charges were filed against her she was about to take an IDF fitness test, which she presumably needed to pass in order to perform her duties.  Just a week before charges were filed she’s still doing duty at checkpoints.

She notes that the company she works for is called Civilian Intelligence (Modiin Ezrahi), one of several Blackwater-like Israeli companies with whom the Israeli government contracts to provide security in the Territories.  This is part of the increasing privatization of the Occupation, which allows Israelis to see it as less a formal function of the State and its military, and instead as a more normal, day-to-day civilian process.

Thanks to Dena Shunra for research and translation assistance in preparing post.

Move Over Eden Abergil, There’s a New Tough Mama in Town

Sunday, May 1st, 2011

shani sivilia arab torturer

What Shani Sivilia does after she's finished her job torturing Palestinians

Humpf, Eden Abergil thought she was tough.  Fuhgedaboudit.  She’s got nothin’ on Shani Sivilia, the new queen of IDF torturers.  Eden is a Girl Scout by comparison.  Seems Shani’s been charged not just with pretending to abuse Palestinians as Abergil did in her Facebook photos, but the real thing.  She put a gun to a Palestinian boy’s head and pulled the trigger, all the while screaming he was an “Arab whore.”  Now that’s what I call torture!

And of course, Sivilia isn’t in the IDF as Abergil was, she’s a member of the truly brutal police unit known for dehumanizing Palestinians on a massive scale, the Border Police.  IDF soldiers are pikers by comparison.

Let’s let Ynet tell the story:

…In March 2010, [a Palestinian] minor was detained at the Rockefeller checkpoint near Jerusalem. A search revealed that he was carrying three firecrackers. After the search, police claim that Ben Ozeri [another Border Policeman] grabbed the minor’s shirt, took him behind a nearby parked bus, beat him in the jaw and kicked him in the knee.

The indictment further suggests that the victim was then handcuffed and turned over to Sivilya and another officer named Zion Benishti. The two put the minor into a squad car and during the drive to the police station Sivilya tightened his cuffs and pulled them down in order to hurt the teen.

When they reached the station, Sivilya and Benishti took the elevator with the minor where Sivilya covered his head with the coat he was wearing.

When they got out of the elevator, Sivilya kicked the teen on his behind and threatened him, saying: “Ten more minutes and you’re dead”…The two officers led the Palestinian to an empty room at the station where they lowered him to his knees with his hands still tied behind his back and his head covered.

At this point, Sivilya took out her personal weapon, cocked it, and pointed the unloaded weapon to the victim’s neck, while she counted down from 10 to one.  The teen is then alleged to have screamed “no, no” after which, when she finished her countdown Sivilya pulled the trigger while yelling “Death to Arabs” and “All Arabs are whores”. During the incident Benishti urged Sivilya to stop, but she refused.

Later Sivilya took the coat off the Palestinian’s head, took one of the firecrackers found on his person and put it back in his pocket and covered his head again. She then used a lighter to make noises and scare him into thinking she was going to light the firecracker in his pocket.

Sivilya allegedly hit the victim and slapped him on the head. As a result, the teen suffered a split lip, bruises on his hands and pain in his leg. The Police Internal Investigations Department claims that Sivilya’s actions were motivated by racism.

Wandering through Sivilya’s Facebook page reveals these salient facts about her tastes and prejudices:

Activities and Fields of Interest

Land of Milk and Alcohol, and Honey and Drugs, Soldiers, Company B Jerusalem Border Police, True Israeli–Not a Shirker

Hat tip to Ido Kenan who brought this story to my attention.

Bin Laden is Dead, Long Live Bin Laden

Sunday, May 1st, 2011

No, I haven’t become an Al Qaeda fan and I’m not drinking to the health of bin Laden’s successor.  My point is that killing one man, no matter how symbolic his life or death might be to world terrorism and the fight against it, won’t change much in the long run.  Undoubtedly, there is a new bin Laden pre-designated by his movement to take his place.  There may even be a set of pre-planned terror attacks prepared for just this eventuality as vengeance for the death of their leader.  While I’m no expert in Al Qaeda, bin Laden had to have been so isolated I don’t see how he could’ve been a key operational or even inspirational figure to Al Qaeda.  His death will likely not slow down or change much the radical Islamist agenda.

The root causes of this movement must be addressed to end its potency for a small cadre of the world’s Muslims.  The U.S. must leave Afghanistan and Iraq.  We must lead–or if not lead–get out of the way of an international campaign to pressure Israel to settle its conflict with the Palestinians.  We must get on the side of the Arab spring and stop supporting the potentates and Old Geezers of the autocracies.

I don’t think it’s that difficult ultimately for western nations like ours to get right with the Arab and Muslim world.  Despite the Al Qaeda anti-western mantra, there is no innate Arab/Muslim hate for the west.  But it is shedding the illusions that have led us to support the Shahs, Mubaraks, Salehs, and Abdullahs that seems to be difficult for our president at this time.  If we embrace the movement toward freedom exemplified by the martyrs of Daraa and Misurata, ultimately the bin Ladens will be consigned to the dustbin of history.

To do this, we will also have to recalibrate our relationship with Israel and our former knee-jerk support for its far-right governments.  There is little doubt that Barack Obama hates Bibi Netanyahu.  But disliking a leader is not the same as compelling him to do something you know he must do in order to bring peace to a region desperately crying out for it.  The truth is that while Obama may’ve achieved something that eluded two previous presidents, this is nothing compared to the heavy lifting he will have to do to truly undermine the attraction radical Islam holds for Al Qaeda and its admirers.

Recognize a Palestinian state come September in the UN General Assembly.  This will go farther than killing 10 bin Ladens in bringing credibility to the U.S. role in the Middle East.

I didn’t realize how much of a disconnect there is between my thinking about this and the general jubilation described in this passage:

The news touched off an extraordinary outpouring of emotion as crowds gathered outside the White House, in Times Square and at the Ground Zero site, waving American flags, cheering, shouting, laughing and chanting, “U.S.A., U.S.A.!” In New York City, crowds sang “The Star-Spangled Banner.”

The author of the NY Times article I quoted above then continues with yet another vast overstatement:

Bin Laden’s demise is a defining moment in the American-led fight against terrorism…

It certainly is not a defining moment.  It’s a moment that, in the long run, means very little.  It’s the equivalent of a small victory that is part of a very long, complicated campaign.  I can’t begin to say how wrong-hearded this attitude is.  What will they say after the next terror attack?  Of course they’ll say we have to kill more of ‘em.  That’s the answer.

It was always going to be tough to defeat Barack Obama in the 2012 election.  That just became that much harder.  And the current Republican field can’t give much succor to the country’s Republicans.  The names Tweedledee and Tweedledum were made for these bozos with the chief clown among them, Donald Trump (at whom Obama took some good whacks during the Correspondents Dinner yesterday night).  Security is always a weak point for Democrats.  Considering Obama got done what neither Clinton nor Bush could before him, his security cred is sky-high and he’ll be able to milk this during the campaign.  Keep in mind that I don’t think Obama’s policies in that part of the world are effective and drone attacks and assassinations are no substitute for having a real substantive policy of addressing the Muslim world.  But he has undoubtedly achieved a coup that eluded many before him.

Performance Optimization WordPress Plugins by W3 EDGE