Mahzor

New York Public Library

Churches

Sarajevo Haggadah

Mah Nishtanah

Sarajevo haggadah

Antaea Darom

Israeli women's art

Action

Torah as music

Ben Heine

Action

ceramic bowl

Mohammad Said Kalash, "Offering Reconciliation" exhibit (photo: Ilan Amihai)

Action

Punch and Judy/Pinchas and Jamila

Avi Katz

Action

David Grossman

Ben Heine

Action

Eldrige Street shul

Lower East Side

Action

Dove

Ben Heine

Action

Two birds

Hoda Jamal

Action

Israeli and Palestinian boys

from documentary, Promises

Action

Cat in the Hat

Yiddish version

Action

Daylight through the Wall

Banksy: graffiti art on Separation Wall

Action

Maurice Sendak's Brundibar set

New Victory Theater (photo: Nan Melville/NYT)

Action

Daniel Barenboim, West-Eastern Divan Orchestra

Palestinian-Israeli musical ensemble (photo: Kerstin Joensson/AP)

Action

Great Day on Eldrige Street

N.Y.'s klezmer greats celebrate shul rededication (photo: Leo Sorel)

Action

Joint Appeal for Peace

(Avi Katz)

Joint Appeal for Peace

Ketubah, Ancona, Italy (1772)

(Jewish Theological Seminary library)

Ancona ketubah

Archive for November, 2010

IDF During Cast Lead: Use a Cell Phone, Go to Paradise (or Hell)

Tuesday, November 9th, 2010
palestinian cell phone

Gaza cell phone users: use a phone, get shot (Ahmed Jadallah/Reuters)

Back in the days when U.S. politicians wanted to prove they were tough on crime there used to be a slogan: “Use a gun, go to jail.”  Now, Tzahal has improved on that with news that if you were a Gazan using a cell phone during Operation Cast Lead, you were in some cases targeted for death by the IDF.  If you were a local resident talking on a cell phone you were a target for any IDF soldier who happened to see you.

So reports the Israeli news portal Walla, noting that the Givati brigade had standing orders to shoot any Palestinian using a cell phone.  It was called the “Pelephone [an Israeli cell phone brand] rule.”  Apparently, soldiers believed that either the cell phones might be used to activate bombs or to report positions of IDF soldiers.  There are no known reports that Gazans actually used their phones for any of these purposes.  Nor is there any evidence of any general IDF warning to Gazans that they would be shot if they were seen using such equipment.

Interesting that the IDF seems not to have taken account that Gazans might be using their cell phones for legitimate purposes like making desperate calls to the Red Crescent Society to evacuate their dead or injured loved ones from homes assaulted by missiles, and from which the IDF refused to allow evacuation till many of the living had bled to death.  Or that they might be trying to ensure that their loved ones might have found safe shelter from the IDF onslaught.

According to the officer who first related the rule to military investigators, it specified that a warning was to be given the Palestinian to stop using the phone.  If the warning was ignored, then a warning shot was to be fired over his head.  If this too was ignored, then shooting at the victim was permitted.  This sounds suspiciously like a post facto justification.  I’d guess that in the field, in the rush of battlefield adrenalin, the niceties of the procedure might’ve been fudged and a frightened boy soldier might’ve shot first and asked questions never.  Not to mention, that very few Givati soldiers would know enough Arabic to be able to communicate this message to a potential victim.  Walla reports that a number of Gazans were injured by such fire.  Investigators are trying to match up reports of deaths mentioned in the Goldstone Report with this procedure to discover whether Gazans were actually killed due to it.

Lt. Col. Ilan Malka, commander of the brigade, has also been questioned about the rule to determine whether it was sanctioned at the highest command level.  Malka has also been investigated for approving the slaughter to the al-Samouni family in their home which resulted in the murder of 21 clan members and grave injuries to many more.

Edo has also posted about this story.

Israeli Diplomat Calls Holocaust Survivor ‘Immoral’, ‘Self-Hating’

Tuesday, November 9th, 2010
alfred grosser

Alfred Grosser: Holocaust survivor's 'immoral' criticism of Israeli Occupation (Monika Zucht/Der Spiegel)

There are some practices of the Israeli government which I find merely offensive.  Then there are some that go far beyond that.  Like the denunciation by an Israeli diplomat in Germany of Holocaust survivor, Alfred Grosser, who is due to keynote the dedication of a Kristallnacht memorial in Frankfurt.  What is Grosser’s crime?  He apparently is a little to sympathetic to Palestinian suffering and a little too critical of the Israeli Occupation for the Israeli foreign ministry’s comfort.  Which is why they issued this odious statement:

Israel’s deputy chief of mission in Germany, Emmanuel Nahshon, said that Frankfurt’s decision to invite Mr. Grosser to speak at the memorial “casts an unfortunate and unnecessary shadow on the event.” He also said that Mr. Grosser’s criticism of Israel was “illegitimate and immoral,” and suggested that his “extreme opinions are tainted by self-hatred.”

Excuse me, but where does a two-bit Israeli underling get off smearing an 85 year-old Jewish victim one of history’s deepest injustices?  Where does he get the chutzpah to do such a thing, the twerp?  Since when is criticizing Israel “immoral?”  And how in God’s name can anyone with a brain in their head accuse a survivor of “self-hatred?”  The very thought is odious.  This man hates suffering and injustice because of what he himself suffered.  He doesn’t hate himself.

Before we go slinging mud at Grosser, let’s consider that he’s a retired professor of political science and generally considered the architect of postwar German-French reconciliation.  Which should give him a small amount of credit in judging the bona fides of Israeli policy toward the Palestinians in that regard.

The Israeli MFA has managed to get the German Jewish communal leadership to carry water for it as well.  Keep in mind once again, that the words below are being used to describe a Holocaust survivor:

Germany’s Central Council of Jews condemned the invitation to Mr. Grosser, saying that he “does not tire [of] equating the situation of the Palestinian population with the fate of millions of Jewish men, women and children during the Shoah… and for this reason plays down the Holocaust and the unspeakable suffering of the victims of National Socialism.”

How does a Holocaust survivor “play down the Holocaust?”  This is an event that is at the core of their existence, one they think of every day, probably more than anything else in their life?  And yet because Grosser disagrees with the Council’s views of the Israeli Occupation he is somehow cheapening the Holocaust?  To her credit, Frankfurt’s mayor has not yet buckled to the unseemly pressure of the Council or Israeli apparatchik.  I hope she stands her ground.  Holocaust survivors owe no explanation to anyone for the moral code they espouse.  When Emmanuel Nachshon has walked for a step, let alone a mile in the shoes of Alfred Grosser, then he can criticize.  Till then, stom et ha-peh (“shut your mouth”).

And lest anyone argue that Grosser is in the minority as a survivor in his criticism of Israeli policy, there are a long line of such distinguished Jewish figures including Pierre Mendes France, Nahum Goldman, Saul Friedlander, Martin Buber, and Albert Einstein.

For any German speakers, his book From Auschwitz to Jerusalem is available at Amazon.

Taglit-Birthright and Birthright Unplugged to Merge

Monday, November 8th, 2010
taglit le'kulanu

New itineraries for revamped Birthright tours

One of the more riveting and unexpected announcements of this year’s General Assembly (GA) of Jewish federations is that the Taglit-Birthright program has decided to merge with Birthright Unplugged and welcome Jewish and Palestinian youth together to return to their ethnic roots in the Holy Land.  The group, to be renamed Birthright for All (Taglit Le’Kulanu), will adopt the slogan:

Israelis And Palestinians. Two People, One Future.

The new group is the inspiration of Youth Against Delegitimization (YAD), which is sponsored by the Jewish Council of North America (JCNA).  YAD believes that the real way to ensure Israel’s legitimacy is by embracing its identity as a nation of Jews, Muslim and Christians.  Hence the decision to add Palestinian youth and staff to the trips.

It is rumored that hedge fund titan and purported Israel-hater George Soros and Palestinian entrepreneur Sam Bahour engineered a coup, wresting control of Taglit from Sheldon Adelson and Michael Steinhardt, its current neocon funders.  When Soros promised the board that he would triple funding and bring an extra 100,000 Diaspora Jewish youth to Israel, it voted to endorse the radical shift in the group’s mission.

The struggle for control of the group has initiated a free-for-all among other right wing funders, with a rumor that Dr. Irwin Mieskeit, noted bingo king and hospital reseller, is angry at the loss of Birthright as a re-education tool for Diaspora Jewish youth.  He is rumored to be considering founding a competing group to be called, My Birthright Not Yours, which will only visit sites sacred to the settler movement.  Included in this group’s tours will be paramilitary training, personal audiences with Mossad hitmen, briefings with IDF commandos preparing them for their next targeted killing assignment.  Parents of tour participants will even be offered shares in Dr. Mieskeit’s real estate projects which are miraculously transforming East Jerusalem into a Jewish city once again.

In comments offered jointly to Arutz Sheva and New York Jewish Press, Mieskeit is reported to have said about the new group:

A bruch on them, we can never support this Birthright fraud nor an effort to bring a more balanced view of Israel.  Who needs balance?  We know right from wrong.  We’re right, they’re wrong.  With those Birthright shmegegees, the next thing you know they’ll be talking about Nakba and Palestinian suffering, wah, wah, wah.  Crocodile tears.  That’s what it is.

Look, let’s be honest.  A little Holocaust trauma goes a long way when you’re trying to steal the land of another people.  I’m not above making Jewish girls cry if it helps me buy the Shepherd Hotel for a song and a dance.

Birthright tours under the old regime were noted for making shidduchs and producing new Jewish couples to take their place proudly on the stage of Jewish history.  Dr. Mieskeit invoked a hidden fear of many Jews thinking about sending their children on intimate tours with Palestinians:

We’ve already got enough Jews marrying out.  Do we need those Palestinian boys shtupping our girls, knocking them up and producing little half-breed Jewrab babies?

Returning to Birthright for All–now, for the first time the program will be open to Palestinian youth as well, enabling them to rediscover their connections to the land of their forebears.  Instead of avoiding the Territories as previous Birthright tours did religiously, the new tours will include travel throughout Israel and the Territories.  In a first, the new Birthright proposes to visit both settlements and their next door neighbor Palestinian villages.  While a Birthright for All spokesperson said that tour participants may help with the Palestinian olive harvest, insurance and legal liability will prevent any of the young people from participating in the pogroms sponsored by the settler youth.

Here is a statement from the new organization about its goals:

Taglit Lekulanu will introduce a more realistic perspective on Israel by exposing participants to both Jewish and Palestinian narratives. The trip will be open to Palestinian and Jewish Americans and staffed by both Jews and Palestinians.

The trip will bear witness to the occupation, spending a morning with MachsomWatch at West Bank checkpoints and taking tours around the Separation Wall and Hebron. There will also be meetings with Palestinian human rights activists and a visit to Jewish settlements in East Jerusalem.

Inside Israel, meetings with IDF officers and Jewish Agency representatives will be complemented by meetings with Israeli anti-occupation activists and civil rights organizers struggling for equal rights for Israel’s Palestinian citizens. Participants will also visit unrecognized Bedouin villages in the Negev and learn about the social struggle of Arab Jews. And of course there will be time to explore Tel Aviv’s famed nightlife and shopping.

Make sure they tell ‘em about all the real estate opportunities available in Jaffo through evicting poor Arabs from their run down apartments, tearing ‘em down, and turning ‘em into luxury condos for white Jews.  This way they can realize their Zionist dreams of rebuilding the homeland while making a handsome profit at the expense of the lowly and downtrodden Arab usurpers.  That oughta keep ‘em comin’ back for more…

Note: Events related above may or may not take liberties with fact.  They certainly bear a greater resemblance to truth, at least as I see it.

Shabak Charges Imam With Supporting Terror, Inciting Murder

Sunday, November 7th, 2010
sheikh abu salim arrested

Sheikh Nazem Abu Salim, Nazareth imam, latest casualty of Shabak war on Israeli Palestinians (Yigal Levi))

Not content merely to destroy mosques, the Shabak has done one better, it has imprisoned without bail yet another Israeli Palestinian imam charging him with crimes which, on the face sound grave, but which on closer examination seem less so:

Sheikh Nazem Abu Salim has allegedly used…web site and…sermons to back global jihad and declare solidarity with Al-Qaida

Israeli authorities have charged an imam from a controversial mosque in the northern city of Nazareth was charged Sunday with inciting violence against Pope Benedict…

Sheikh Nazem Abu Salim, who heads the Shihab A-Din Mosque, was arrested by police a month ago along with Mohammed Naarani, on suspicion of illegally unionizing [ed., this must be an error and probably should read "organizing"], conspiring to commit a crime and support for a terrorist organization…

The indictment said Abu Salim preached “an ideological world view identical to that of global jihad” and wrote “publications that supported and identified with the terror organization Al-Qaida”.  It said Abu Salim’s teachings inspired attacks against Jews and Christians, including the murder of one Jew.

The Shabak seems unable to differentiate between an Israeli Palestinian who refuses to toe the Israeli party line and one who is truly a fomentor of terror.  Abu Salim’s main threat as far as I can tell is that he is a fiery, cantankerous, even intolerant preacher who rouses his flock to resistance against both Israeli and U.S. policy in the region.  He appears to be a zealous advocate for Islam, one who bears little fondness for any religion that, in his view, harms Islam.  But a terrorist?  Accomplice to murder?  Hardly.

Here, for example is a quotation from the right-wing Maariv of statements he has allegedly made.  I’m trying to do research to get the original Arabic and so do truer translations hewing to his original intent.  But for now, this is what I have.  In the first case, he spoke about the Pope’s visit to Nazareth:

It is true, we did not want the Pope to come here [to Nazareth].  The world-wide solution to every problem is Islam.  This the imperialist Americans do not want.  The Communists are gone and now they are at war with us.  They seek an Islam that is weak and beholden to them as it is in America, and not true Islam…True Islam is content to live within its own faith, having mercy on the weak.  But against us stands the evil global empire, America.  Allah is the One who will solve our problems.  There is murder against the Muslim ummah around the world–in Gaza, Afghanistan, Iraq, and more.  They intentionally murder women and children.  After the Gaza flotilla, Israel seeks to show the world that it is with the Christians and against the Muslims.

Maariv quotes another comment by Abu Salim on the Pope’s visit:

We are opposed to the visit by the Pope who has cursed the Prophet Muhammad, attacked Islam and approved of the slaughter in Gaza.

The prosecution claims that on his website, Muslim 48 (which Israeli authorities have taken down), he explicitly endorsed the views of Osama bin Laden.  It further claims that he advocated acts of violence and that his followers committed such acts at his urging, including the murder of a taxi driver, kidnapping of a Domino’s Pizza delivery man, and cacheing of weapons for the purpose of acts of violence against “IDF soldiers, the Pope, and any target that harmed Islam.”

According to this Bar Ilan University professor publishing at News1, an Israeli right wing news portal-scandal sheet, Shabak arrested seven Israeli Palestinian youths accusing them of the crimes noted above.  Several confessed to the killing and others allegedly attempted to travel to Somalia to join in global jihad.  They supposedly got as far as Kenya, where authorities allegedly stopped them and returned them to Israel.  All supposedly are devout followers of the Sheikh, if you believe what you read.  But I think that remains to be seen and proven.

As is usual in these cases, I see lots of charges and no evidence.  While I have not yet explored Abu Salim’s views in great depth, I haven’t seen any solid evidence that any of these charges are based in hard evidence.  Where are the guns?  Where is the proof that Abu Salim inspired anyone to kill a Jew?  Where are the words of Bin Laden on the Muslim48 website (though it has been taken down I am exploring whether the site may be archived or cached somewhere online).  What real violence against the Pope did he inspire?

It looks like the Shabak just got another Palestinian korban (victim) and created another martyr.

Israel’s Kristallnacht: Police Demolish Bedouin Mosque

Saturday, November 6th, 2010
rahat mosque

Rahat mosque built with Islamist support demolished (Lewis Levin)

Saturday night was the Bedouin town of Rahat’s version of Kristallnacht.  And if that historical analogy offends you, let’s just call this an episode out of the Crusades in which the invaders sacked mosques on their way to claim the Holy Land for their own.  It was the day 5,000 Israeli police invaded their town under cover of darkness to destroy one of the town’s mosques.  In only two hours, the hooligans declared victory, the damage done.

What is it about the Israeli government?  Most human beings and governments have red lines beyond which they know not to pass.  Human beings may be afraid of the consequences of crossing those lines in terms of suffering social ostracism.  Nations too often are concerned that if they act without inhibition that they will face ostracism on the world stage.  Israel seems to have been born lacking that innate gene that offers a sense of judgment and proportion which might otherwise inhibit egregious violations.

How else to explain the latest outrage, the destruction of the Bedouin mosque of Rahat in Israel’s Negev.  The ostensible reason?  The mosque was built by the Islamic Movement Northern Branch during the 2009 Gaza war.  The Movement’s leader, Sheikh Raed Salah , is the Shabak’s bete noire, having just been sentenced to nine months in prison for allegedly spitting at a police officer.

They needed 5,000 police in order to wade into the community in full force and destroy one of its house of worship.  Thousands of residents met the invaders and riots ensued.  Tin-eared?  Provocative?  Death wish?  All of the above.

rahat mosque destroyed

Israel's Kristallnacht: destruction of Bedouin mosque (Eliyahu Herskovitz)

Whatever you want to say about the state-sanctioned vandals, you can’t say they weren’t sensitive to “religious sentiment” by removing the Korans and other holy texts before wreaking havoc.  Imagine that: they know to remove religious texts but not to allow a house of God to remain standing.  What is wrong with this picture?

The only thing different from the fires set by settlers in West Bank mosques and this is that the settlers actually burned the sacred texts, while the police in Rahat removed them.  Though ironically, in Rahat they did a much more thorough job of eradicating the mosque.  Perhaps the next time settlers wish to destroy a mosque they too should bring bulldozers to do the job properly.  Let it not be said that the settlers don’t learn lessons in the proper way to provoke Palestinians from their government.

Rahat’s mayor noted the utter hypocrisy of the demolition:

Rahat mayor Faiz Abu Sahiban claimed the act was a direct offense against all Muslims…he added that the act was a “flagrant violation” of Rahat’s jurisdiction. “We have four mosques that were built without due permit, so they can demolish them all.”

So which one is next?  Of course, virtually no Palestinians in Israel can secure a building permit for anything, which is why the mosque did not have one.  Jews somehow always manage to secure building permits for their projects.

Whatever you want to say about the Israeli police, they do seem to have an exquisite, unintentional sense of irony.  They praised their vandalism saying they:

…”Would not turn a blind eye and would protect the rule of law, all the while acting with the utmost consideration of Muslim sentiment.”

Ynet quotes the police further saying:

Not to destroy it would’ve caused even more damage to the rule of law.

Why is it that the “rule of law” seems to be a euphemism for persecuting the Muslim minority.  And that the rules that are enforced seem to be so easily overlooked when offenders are Jews.  What about those hundreds of illegal settlements built without permits?  They get a pass because the law seems to be different for Jews than Muslims.

The IDF has destroyed a number of synagogues in West Bank settlements which were built during, and in violation of the settlement freeze.  But without this U.S. mandated agreement it seems unlikely that any of these would have been torn down.

Israel is a nation hell-bent on poisoning relations with its Muslim minority.  What it refuses to understand is that as long as it runs roughshod over the rights of the minority the welfare of the entire nation is endangered.  Israel’s Jewish government is attempting to seal itself off from its Arab fellow citizens.  But it cannot do so.  If they are driven away, then the entire nation suffers.  Israel’s Jews and Muslims are in it together.  They will live together or die together.  And the death of one is the death of all.  The suffering of one is the suffering of all.  Why do Israel’s leaders harden their heart like Pharoah to this almost self-evident truth?

John Donne’s poem should be the motto of contemporary Israel:

No man is an island, entire of itself; every man is a piece of the continent, a part of the main; if a clod be washed away by the sea, Europe is the less, as well as if a promontory were, as well as if a manor of thy friends or of thine own were; any man’s death diminishes me, because I am involved in mankind…

Israeli Cultural Figures Appeal to Actors to Boycott Ariel

Saturday, November 6th, 2010
ariel cultural center

Israei cultural luminaries urge boycott of Ariel cultural center (Moti Milrod)

With only a few days remaining before the first theatrical performance at the new Ariel cultural center, leading Israeli intellectuals, artists and cultural figures have renewed their appeal (and in English) to Israeli theater actors to boycott the settlement.

Among those leading the campaign are several Israel Prize (the equivalent of a Pulitzer Prize) winners David Grossman, actress Hanah Meron, playwright Yehoshua Sobol, choreographer Ehud Naharin, Oded Cutler, Liora Rivlin and other notable figures who wrote in an open letter to them:

It is impossible to force you to perform.  We call on you to make a choice on behalf of the command of conscience and communal responsibility.

Maariv notes that the letter aims to bolster the will of the performers and encourage them if they make the decision to refuse.  Many of the signatories are iconic figures in Israeli cultural life who are interested in conveying a loud and clear message to the actors that they are not alone in this campaign.  On the other hand, the letter writers also seek to remind the actors that if they do appear the decision and its consequences are theirs alone and responsibility cannot be diverted to their companies or producers.  In words that seem to echo those used by German civilians during the Holocaust to absolve themselves of responsibility, boycott advocates said:

After publication of this letter no one will be able to say he didn’t know or didn’t understand the meaning of what was happening…Ariel is no town within Israel.

The letter warns in no uncertain terms:

Dear Actors: You are about to appear at a cultural center in the settlement of Ariel built on conquered territory.  At a distance of only a few kilometers from the flourishing Ariel, are Palestinian refugee camps whose residents experience hard living conditions without basic human rights.  Not only are they not able to enjoy performances and similar cultural events, many don’t even enjoy running water.  These are two separate realities which create a policy of apartheid.

http://www.richardsilverstein.com/tikun_olam/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/RM28514322amp912amp93_gd.jpg

IDF Kashers Checkpoints, Replacing Arabic With Hebrew Names

Saturday, November 6th, 2010
palestinian undresses at israeli checkpoint

IDF soldier points gun at Palestinian outside Bethlehem, showing 'em who's boss at the checkpoint (Musa Al-Shaer/AFP/Getty Images)

Not content with having razed thousands of Palestinian villages during the Nakba, converting the names of thousands of places from Arabic to Hebrew names, and now Judaizing Palestinian East Jerusalem, the incoming deputy chief of staff, Yair Naveh (whose security lapses allowed Anat Kamm to reproduce thousands of top secret IDF documents, for which he received no reprimand or even investigation), will be “converting” the names of Israeli checkpoints from their original Arabic to Hebrew names.  For example, Nilin, the site of ferocious anti-Wall protests, will become Kiryat HaSefer.   It reminds me of the kashering of one’s home before Pesach to ensure it will be pristine and pure for the coming holiday.

The IDF’s reasoning according to the Maariv story?

The Hebrew names will convey to Palestinians the message of Israeli control…It will also convey to the soldiers and border crossing personnel that they are not protecting a Palestinian area, but Israeli territory.

Yes, this is some of the bold, innovative strategic thinking we can expect out of the incoming regime of Yoav Galant and Yair Naveh.  Name changes.  That’s the key to IDF control of the Palestinians.  The latter will certainly be cowed by this new development and undoubtedly it will have a deep impact on their very psyches.

Israel doesn’t merely occupy territory, it also occupies the linguistic space as well, attempting to “convert” place names from Muslim/Arabic to Jewish/Hebrew.

Curse Like a Settler

Friday, November 5th, 2010
israeli settlers resist evacuation

Israeli settlers shout curses while resisting evacuation

Back in the 1980s there was a catchy girl band hit, Walk Like an Egyptian.  Today, Yediot Achronot reports the Hilltop Youth are teaching Israel to curse like a settler, strongly but cleanly, and even in code.  Instead of “Nazi scum,” you can now expect to hear the mellifluous “son of perverse rebellion,” or even more succinctly “son of Rahab” [whore].

Some sensitive souls among the extremist settlers must’ve been distressed to hear some of the foul language out of the mouths of the Hilltop Youth when faced with IDF soldiers pulling them from their illegal outposts.  So they’ve published a new booklet with more appropriate language to use in cursing the authorities.  This should go down as part of a longer essay entitled, Rhetoric of Occupation:

Upon…the start of the settlement outpost demolition season, here is the newest hit in [extremist settlements] Ramat Migron and Shvut Ami: the phrasebook for spoken curses.  In a manner similar to the [phrases used on the] IDF two-way radio network, people in the Judea and Samaria hilltops will also start to talk in uniform curses.

A new booklet currently being distributed among the hilltop youth contains rules of behavior for the demolition of settlement outposts, and curses recommended for use in response to…police officers.  From now on, the young people will use cleaner language and curses that incorporate Biblical themes, with more contemporary and sophisticated curses.  “Garbage” and “scumbag”—out, “vinegar from wine” [phrase traditionally used to denote the wicked son of a righteous father] and “Indian”—in.

The “phrasebook” is very up to date, and so, for example, if a policeman acts without using judgment, he should be asked: “Who sent you, Ehud Barak the moron?” following the statements made by Histadrut Chairman Ofer Eini this past Wednesday about Barak.  A policeman wearing a kippa will be called a “Mafdalnik” [i.e., supporter of the defunct moderate religious party]; a patrolman who reneges on his promises will be called “Bibi,” and if a leftist policeman comes to a settlement outpost, he should be called “Son of Rahab” [i.e., son of a whore, cf. Joshua 2:1].

…The introduction to the booklet…states: “There are no words to describe the feelings of a young man who encounters an ambush of policemen who knock the stuffing out of him, or a young woman who is beaten by violent Border Policemen…It is necessary to respond to policemen who crudely use foul language.”

…From now on the soundtrack of the evacuations will sound different…Right wing activist Itamar Ben Gvir said to Yedioth Ahronoth: “This booklet should lead to soul-searching among the policemen who participate in demolishing settlement outposts.  We should not, of course, generalize about all policemen, many of them try to maintain restraint, but there are also policemen who do not, and they are the ones for whom the curses are intended.”

The phrasebook

The event: “A policeman who scalps people and uses a club”

The curse: “Indian”

The event: “A policeman who acts without sense and without judgment”

The curse: “Who sent you, Ehud Barak the moron?”

The event: “A policeman who hits and hurts girls”

The curse: “Do you beat your wife, too? Pedophile!”

The event: “A policeman from a good right wing family who strays from the path and becomes an enemy of Israel”

The curse: “Vinegar from wine”

The event: “A policeman with a kippa who participates in demolishing homes”

The curse: “Mafdalnik”

The event: “A policeman from an extreme left wing background who puts into practice the views that he brought from home”

The curse: “Son of perverse rebellion” [see 1 Samuel 20:30], “Son of Rahab”

If the Hilltop Youth think this will undermine the resolve of the IDF they must be smoking a powerful drug.  But an even more critical question is whether the IDF commanders and defense minister have the will to uproot illegal settlements.  They are the key to this process and no amount of clean cursing or euphemisms will change that.

Performance Optimization WordPress Plugins by W3 EDGE