Mahzor

New York Public Library

Churches

Sarajevo Haggadah

Mah Nishtanah

Sarajevo haggadah

Antaea Darom

Israeli women's art

Action

Torah as music

Ben Heine

Action

ceramic bowl

Mohammad Said Kalash, "Offering Reconciliation" exhibit (photo: Ilan Amihai)

Action

Punch and Judy/Pinchas and Jamila

Avi Katz

Action

David Grossman

Ben Heine

Action

Eldrige Street shul

Lower East Side

Action

Dove

Ben Heine

Action

Two birds

Hoda Jamal

Action

Israeli and Palestinian boys

from documentary, Promises

Action

Cat in the Hat

Yiddish version

Action

Daylight through the Wall

Banksy: graffiti art on Separation Wall

Action

Maurice Sendak's Brundibar set

New Victory Theater (photo: Nan Melville/NYT)

Action

Daniel Barenboim, West-Eastern Divan Orchestra

Palestinian-Israeli musical ensemble (photo: Kerstin Joensson/AP)

Action

Great Day on Eldrige Street

N.Y.'s klezmer greats celebrate shul rededication (photo: Leo Sorel)

Action

Joint Appeal for Peace

(Avi Katz)

Joint Appeal for Peace

Ketubah, Ancona, Italy (1772)

(Jewish Theological Seminary library)

Ancona ketubah

Archive for August, 2010

Jewish Agency PR Flack Defends Hagee Gift to Im Tirzu

Saturday, August 21st, 2010

A few days ago the Israeli financial blog Calcalist published an expose (English translation) on a $3-million gift by John Hagee’s Christians United for Israel, which was passed through the Jewish Agency via the Houston Jewish federation where it originated.  I’ve reported in the past on the beneficiaries of tens of millions of dollars of Hagee/CUFI largess which are often settler projects and major settlements.  The gift Calcalist was most interested in was $120,000 transmitted to the far-right Israeli group, Im Tirzu.

Among other violations of Jewish Agency procedure concerning this gift and noted by the Israeli blog was that its funding is supposed to support educational projects, which it does in many cases.  But the notion that there is any educational component to Im Tirzu’s agenda is laughable.  It is a purely partisan entity characterized by bare-knuckle, brawling-style political activism as evidenced by its scuzzy attacks on the New Israel Fund‘s Naomi Hazan and its nascent campaign to sack the leadership of Ben Gurion University’s political science department for alleged “anti-Zionist” tendencies.

Israel has (or once had, before major cuts in the national education budget) a fine higher education system developed over decades and nurtured in the principles of academic inquiry and the freedom to pursue knowledge in diverse ways.  Im Tirzu, if it had its way, would turn the Israeli educational system into cheerleaders for an ideologically correct pro-Zionist agenda.  They would destroy the notion of academic freedom which is the pillar of any good university.  And the Jewish Agency is willing to financially pimp on behalf of this garbage.

Just after I published my post on this, I noticed that Haviv Rettig Gur asked to friend me on Facebook.  I remembered he was at one time a Jerusalem Post reporter, one of the interchangeable set which vent their noxiousness under the tutelage of queen bee neocon ranter-editor, Caroline Glick.  I wondered why he wanted to friend me.  After I confirmed him as a friend I received a message from him on my Wall sternly admonishing Calcalist and, by inference, me for “profound and irresponsible ignorance” in our reporting on Hagee’s gift.

In his initial message he wanted to make the point that the Jewish Agency wasn’t endorsing Hagee’s gift or Im Tirzu, but was merely providing “philanthropic oversight,” which in a later message he described as follows:

In order to enable contributions to charities and Israeli civil society from abroad, the Federations, the UIA and the Agency provide a special program of financial oversight. This program is trusted by the American authorities, so that when we say the money arrived at its destination and is used for its intended purpose, they believe us and the donor back home can receive the tax benefits of his or her donation.

Translation: the Jewish Agency passes money from Hagee along to Im Tirzu.  Further, the Houston federation sends the check to the JA, which in turn transfers it to Im Tirzu.  Which means the Agency, in doing so, gives Hagee and his dirty anti-Semitic money an Israeli-Zionist heksher in addition to a 501c3 designation making it tax-deductible.

Here Rettig Gur argues that Israel should be proud of Hagee’s beneficence:

Hagee, for his part, uses the [JA pass-through] service for gifts for which Israel should be deeply grateful. Hagee’s own Israel portfolio…included last year a $750,000 gift to Barzilai Hospital, among others. Ironically, Im Tirzu’s latest target, Ben Gurion University, also received money from Hagee.

Again, this is self-serving pap.  If you read the post I wrote on Hagee’s Israel giving, anyone can see that the preponderance of his charity is to the settlement enterprise.  Yes, he does give to glatt kosher non-profits like hospitals and he does give major gifts for aliya absorption, but it doesn’t cancel out his massive giving to support the “don’t give an inch” brigade.  As for Ben Gurion University, I think it’s safe to say next year BGU won’t be receiving a red cent (or agora) from the likes of Hagee since he’ll certainly want to honor Im Tirzu’s version of pro-Zionist BDS.

Rettig Gur argues additionally that Hagee’s gift to Im Tirzu is no different from gifts it designates for “leftist” Israeli groups as well such as Bustan and Shatil.  The mere fact that Im Tirzu is a Zionist group gives it immediate approval.  No mention, in this line of argument, of the Agency’s requirement that funds only be given for educational purposes.  Further, the so-called leftist groups he mentions are not engaged in intimidation or incitement against anyone.  They don’t pay for full-page ads in all the major Israeli papers picturing Naomi Hazan with a rhino-horn on her nose in a Shturmer-like pose.  Nor do they extort Zionist-correctness from Israeli universities.  In fact, Bustan and Shatil are engaged in the important work of building Israeli democracy through empowering Bedouin communities (on the one hand) and promoting social justice for underprivileged sectors of Israeli society (on the other).  These are positive and constructive goals in which no one is smeared, no one is sacked from their job.  You can’t say the same for Im Tirzu.

The Jewish Agency PR flack argued that the story of Hagee’s gift was “old news” because Didi Remez had reported it on his blog in February.  What this conveniently ignores is that Didi did not know at the time that the gift was funneled to Israel via the Jewish Agency and Houston federation.  That is BIG news.  News that it is Rettig Gur’s job to minimize as insignificant.  Additionally, Calcalist reported that the Central Fund of Israel, an American Jewish pro-settler group sent $35,000 to Im Tirzu.  None of this was reported by Didi.  So the term “scoop” used by Calcalist, and which so annoys Rettig Gur, is a precise and correct term.

My trusty correspondent also takes humbrage that I’ve implicated his boss, Natan Sharansky, in the matter by mentioning him in my first post.  I merely noted that Hagee would surely feel right at home trusting his money to be channeled through an agency directed by the Israeli neocon, Sharansky.

Rettig Gur closed his last message (undoubtedly there will be more as he seems to have an inveterate need to explain and defend himself and his employer) with a strange set of near-non sequiturs intended to buff his Israeli liberal street cred:

I’ll accept your apology for sullying my good name, and happily respond to any further concerns. Funny, I have some good friends in places like B’tselem, Van Leer and ACRI. My father was a parliamentary aide to Yossi Sarid as far back as the 1970s and was a board member of RHR for a while. In all my life, no one from that world has ever been as rude and crude to me as you, and you’ve never even met me.

Why does someone like this feel he is owed any special treatment?  Why should I treat him with kid gloves when he aids and abets the likes of John Hagee and Im Tirzu?  So I replied:

You can accept my apology if you wish to be a fantasist. But you won’t be getting an actual apology from me any time soon. There is always time to repent from your embrace of scum like Im Tirzu. But I doubt you’ll ever do so. When you do, then let me know and I’ll concede teshuva is a concept that works in your case. Till then, you’ll have my consistent criticism of you and JA.

Oh, and isn’t that nice ‘some of your best friends are Negroes.’ How sweet and condescending. You’re really a good guy aren’t you? Liberal & all.

Your father was an aide to Yossi Sarid 40 years ago & you want a pass because of that? What have you done lately? Not your father, you.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Why U.S.-Brokered Israeli-Palestinian Peace Talks Will Fail

Saturday, August 21st, 2010

The ink isn’t even dry on the press release announcing Israeli-Palestinian peace talks beginning under U.S. auspices on September 2nd, before just about everyone except Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton is sighing with abject resignation and conviction that they will be a failure.  Why?  First, because the U.S. president has not publicly told the sides what the consequences of failure will be.  There must be a downside for the parties that will keep them in line when the going gets tough (as it assuredly will).  With no downside, Bibi will play Obama like a tin fiddle.  Second, Bibi doesn’t want the talks to succeed and will do absolutely nothing to make them work.  Why should he?  Where’s the benefit to him?  His coalition is filled with far-right yahoos who will scream bloody murder at the first sign of weakness from their leader.  Does he need such headaches?  Does he relish the idea of retiring to a plush office at the Shalem Center so he can gaze fondly at a portrait of his sugar daddy, Shelly Adelson, on the wall?  Not likely.

Frankly, I can’t see anything in this for Mahmoud Abbas either, and have no clue why he agreed to participate.  Did he enjoy having endless coffees with Ehud Olmert in Jerusalem and Ramallah so much that he wants to resume the pleasure, except his time in Washington?  What will he get from this?  Another upgrade of his D.C. digs from third world backwater semi-official would-be embassy to almost embassy of a soon to be nation in waiting?

If this is all the Obama administration has up its sleeve it has a losing hand.  But if it has a backup plan in the certain event of failure, then it might still wrest victory from the jaws of defeat.  If it is prepared and possibly even expects failure and has a Plan B which would call for an internationally imposed settlement on both sides, then he might be onto something.  In the end, the only thing that can save the parties from mutually assured destruction is external intervention.

The eventual solution is there for all to see and clear as day.  But getting there with these two parties is nigh unto impossible.  So in order to prevent them from doing even more mischief than they have already to regional stability and world order, there must be outside powers who tell them what they will do for peace.  Let them scream bloody murder, swear up and down it will not, indeed cannot happen.  Have no doubt, it will happen.

I more and more see Israel playing the role Serbia did in the Kosovo and Bosnian conflicts.  It too saw itself as victim of NATO and U.S. perfidy.  It swore on the graves of its forefathers that it would never capitulate.  Its national honor was on the line, etc.  And guess what happened?  It blinked when faced with indomitable international pressure.  The same may and could happen with Israel.

As usual, Ethan Bronner’s reporting linked above is full of his typical blithely partisan blather, though the basic reporting of facts is useful.

Hudson Institute Funds Extremists Seeking Destruction of Israeli Academic Freedom

Saturday, August 21st, 2010

The Hudson Institute, founded by Herman “Thinking the Unthinkable” Kahn and peopled by the hottest names in neocon-dom, is attempting to work its magic on Israel.  According to Didi Remez’s Coteret blog, Hudson is heavily funding two Israeli extremist groups which are targeting Israeli higher education by demanding the firing of “left-wing” professors considered hostile to Zionism.  They also want to “reform” the teaching of Zionism in the social sciences by removing “anti-Zionist” materials from the syllabi and removing unconventional or dissident ideas as well.  This is the thought police run amok.  This is David Horowitz with a Hebrew accent.  This is Campus Watch and the David Project translated to an Israeli context.

The right-wing Institute is providing $500,000 to the Institute for Zionist Strategies, an Im Tirzu look-alike which is, like its ideological twin, pressuring Israeli universities (in IZS’s case Tel Aviv University) to review and adjust its curricular offerings corresponding to the former’s partisan orientation.  The pressure has worked in the case of TAU, whose president has asked to review the course offering of the sociology department after a complaint that it was infested by “post-Zionist” thinking.  The group defines the latter as:

…The pretense to undermine the foundations of the Zionist ethos and an affinity with the radical leftist stream.

IZS was founded by Yisrael Harel, a settlement leader and (wonders never cease) a Haaretz columnist.  Harel’s got TAU’s knickers in such a knot that the University president is actually reviewing individual course syllabi:

The university has stated that since this is Klafter’s first year as president, he is intensively studying what is being taught at the university, and this includes reviewing course syllabi.

One wonders whether there isn’t an Israeli institute for new university presidents where they can go to learn how to do their jobs.  Leadership 101 would teach them that this isn’t their job, but rather the job of the department heads who are designated by him and his subordinates.  When presidents are doing what this guy is doing they’re either running way scared or simply don’t know shit from shinola about being a president.

For those of you who studied the McCarthy era in your American history classes, the following quotation will remind you of that speech in Wheeling, WVA where the senator screamed there were 53 known Communists (the number kept increasing with each speech he made thereafter) in the State Department.  Here Haaretz is referring to a “report” written by IZS “analyzing” sources used by the sociology department:

The paper says final figures from the courses examined shows syllabi contained 146 sources the authors defined as Zionist and 440 sources deemed post-Zionist.

Those of you who know the courageous role that Yehuda Shenhav has played both as a TAU professor and human rights activist will gather that the following was intended as a bitterly ironic statement:

…Shenhav, one of the professors whose course reading list was requested, said: “I have no doubt that the president…requested [the syllabi] to protect academic freedom against McCarthyism.”

As they say in Hebrew: Ha’levay (roughly translated as “I’ll bet”).

If any of this is reminiscent of the work of Im Tirzu, which has been busy wreaking similar havoc on the political science department at Ben Gurion University, it could be because Ronen Shoval, the group’s founder, learned his trade at workshops sponsored by IZS.  What makes this even stranger is that Shoval has previous denied such collaboration between the groups as has IZS.  But the fact of the matter is that the terms of the attacks, the concepts utilized in the reports which criticize the various academic departments, all of this points to the groups aping each other’s tactics:

Not only is the methodology of the two reports identical (an examination of syllabi and a classification of lecturers into categories such as “Zionist” and “anti-Zionist” ), but the conclusions they reached about the state of Israeli academia are similar.

IZS’ advisor committee includes such noteworthy Israeli neocons as Michael Oren, Moshe “Bogie” Yaalon, Natan Sharansky, and Ron Baratz.  Baratz was the academic fig leaf who served as mashgiach for the Im Tirzu hit job on Ben Gurion University.  Baratz also let out a geshrei when the Hebrew University’s philosophy department declined to renew his one-year adjunct lecturer appointment, claiming his “firing” resulted from ideological bias (interesting that the subject of ancient Greek philosophy could be approached through an ideological bias).

meyrav wurmser

Meyrav Wurmser, doyenne of pro-Israel neocondom, funder of attacks on Israeli academia

Hudson’s generosity toward IZS stems at least in part from the former’s senior fellow, Meyrav Wurmser, one of the foremost pro-Israel neocons in Washington, a former Bush administration apparachik, former director of the anti-Arab media outlet, MEMRI, and wife of David Wurmser.  The latter was a colleague of Doug Feith in the Bush Defense Department.  Or to paraphrase Stan Laurel: “That’s a fine kettle of pro-Israel fish you’ve gotten us into, Ollie.”  Ms. Wurmser is the founder and director of Hudson’s Center for Middle East Policy.

Remez writes that neither IZS nor Hudson note on their respective websites the web of financial support woven between the two groups.  The former’s website notes in Hebrew that its donor data is “private,” while in English it claims that support derives from an IZS Friends group.  You’d have to examine the IRS 990 report and Israeli government funder report in order to learn this information.  Certainly not the finest example of philanthropic transparency.

Ironically, Im Tirzu, NGO Monitor and none other than IZS are the godfathers of the new Knesset bill which will require “transparency” from Israeli NGOs like the New Israel Fund and B’Tselem, which allegedly receive “tainted” donations from foreign sources hostile to Israeli Zionism.  One wonders whether the law will somehow exclude IZS from its scrutiny or whether the latter will suddenly get religion and bring its own accounting into line with the proposed law.

uzi arad

Uzi Arad, Bibi's national security Rasputin, gone over to the Dark Side

Hudson also donated $600,000 to the Atlantic Forum of Israel in 2007, which Didi characterizes as “an opaque, security oriented organization” founded by Bibi Netanyahu’s national security Rasputin, Uzi Arad.  Arad, in his past life a Mossad operative, is accused of being instrumental in the Larry Franklin/Aipac spy case.  For a time during the Bush administration, Arad was persona non grata in Washington.  In one of its less intelligent moves, Obama opened its arms to Arad after Bibi elevated him to the national security advisor role in his new government.  We can charitably say about Arad that he long ago went over to the Dark Side.

Though the Atlantic Forum’s website is under construction, the American Jewish Congress described the former as Israel’s “non-governmental representative to NATO.”  In other words, a repository for all manner of Israeli spookdom on European soil.

What is interesting here is that the Hudson Institute clearly favors attacking Iran.  Uzi Arad, who stepped down from his leadership role at the Forum on joining the government, favors attacking Iran.  U.S. government policy (at this time) opposes attacking Iran.  Which means that a U.S. neocon think tank has teamed up with the current Israeli national security advisor to advocate a position at odds with U.S. foreign policy.  Nothing illegal about that.  But Didi and I think both the U.S. and Israeli publics deserve the right to know about such tag team wrestling duos attempting to wreak havoc with U.S. policy.  Further, I think this makes Hudson an agent of Israeli influence (and vice versa).

Enhanced by Zemanta

Israel’s Intelligence Hocus-Pocus Regarding Iran Attack

Friday, August 20th, 2010

Someone is scammin’ me.  Or at least trying to.  They’re flattering me with supposedly top-secret information I didn’t request.  They’re offering to visit me here in Seattle to deliver the battle plans for Israel’s upcoming attack.  They’re telling me the supposed code name for the operation.  They’re offering me the actual date of the attack.  They’re offering to help defend my blog from the DoS attacks it suffered over the past few weeks.

One of these individuals claimed he was a former IAF military intelligence officer.  He didn’t like my politics, but somehow was willing to–or was almost willing to since he seemed to have moral compunctions about sharing those battle plans–pass Israel’s crown jewels to me.  He’s the one who told me the code name for the attack.  But he had a nasty habit of unloading on me and claiming I “hated Israel.”  I told him to take a hike.  The second fellow also somehow knew the same code name for the attack.  He also told me that Mr. X, a prisoner being held incommunicado at Ayalon Prison, is a captured official of a certain Muslim nation considered an enemy by Israel (hint, hint).

Those of you who’ve been reading my blog over the past few months will know that I’ve been focussing most of my investigative efforts around miscarriages of justice committed by Israeli intelligence.  So stories like those I’m being offered are meant to flatter me and my nose for news.  Bloggers always want a scoop.  The thinking of those offering me these tidbits must be to drop little bits of red meat in front of me and hope I’ll bite.

But as a blogger who tries to be careful about what he writes, I have to take a step back and ask: why me?  Why would anyone who actually had the order of battle for Israel’s Iran attack want to share it with me?  Further, why would an Israeli who disagrees vociferously with my views want to share such information with me?  It doesn’t pass the smell test.

So I think I’m being had either by operatives from Israeli intelligence or else by freelancers who think they’re promoting Israel’s interests by scamming this blog.  What’s their motivation?  That’s a tough question to answer.  Nearest I can tell, the Israelis figure that the more they can keep the notion that they will attack Iran in the news the more likely Americans will either accept the notion that Israel will attack when it does; or else it will plow fertile ground fertilizing it for a U.S. attack.

Most Americans polled favor such an attack.  But most serious analysts don’t believe Obama will attack Iran.  That’s why the Israelis have their work cut out for them and why they’d like to co-opt this blog to do their work for them.  They imagine if I half-believe them that my vanity as a blogger-reporter will motivate me to disseminate my message not only here but perhaps at other sites like Iranian.com, Huffington Post.  And they hope that other bloggers will pick up my message and amplify it for them.  Not to mention Iranians who they’d love to psych out by having them believe that Israel might, just might do the wild thing and, to paraphrase Sarah Palin, bomb, baby bomb.

Well, sorry guys, not this time.  I’m not going to shill for you or anyone else.  I’m not going to bite.  In fact, if Israeli operatives are pushing me to write about an Israeli attack on Iran I’m inclined to believe precisely the opposite–that Israel will not attack Iran.  But there’s one problem.  Israel clearly wants to attack Iran.  Dying to, in fact.  If it doesn’t, who will?  There’s only one option as I mentioned, the U.S.  As best I can tell, the Israelis must believe that there is some way they can persuade, cajole or force the U.S. to attack.  The notion seems far-fetched to me.  But Israel has done many things in the past I never would’ve believed it would do and I never underestimate it’s ability to generate regional mischief.

But if you read about an Israeli attack on Iran code-named for a famous ancient Persian king on the day before Rosh Hashana, you’ll know I should’ve believed them and I’ll be kicking myself.  But I think it’s highly unlikely.

Eden Aberjil, IDF Soldier: ‘I Would Gladly Slaughter Arabs’

Thursday, August 19th, 2010
eden aberjil on facebook

Eden Aberjil confesses to the pleasure she would take in slaughtering Arabs

The saga of Eden Aberjil continues (Hebrew, shortened English version here).  Apparently, she doesn’t do a very good job of monitoring who her Facebook friends are AND she continues to open her big mouth there getting herself in deeper and deeper doo-doo.  In truth, she was slightly provoked, but she walked right into it and deserves everything she has coming to her.  It appears that Ido Kenan displayed some parody photos of Aberjil (one of which is featured here), turning her into an object of satire.  Instead of ignoring it she rose to the bait.  And she was NOT amused by Ido’s hijinks.

eden aberjil parody

Eden Aberjil parody photo

Haaretz reports that she replied:

I am in favor of a Jewish Zionist state.  I will defend what is mine always and forever!  I declare and define myself as a proud Jewish woman.  And as a proud Jewish woman, I am obligated to fight for what is mine.  One comment someone left in the thread for this picture says it all: “If she wasn’t alert they would come and kill your mother.”  And I’m not talking only about me but about every soldier who guards and protects us.

In war there are no laws.  I hate Arabs and wish them ill.  With pleasure I would kill them, even slaughter them.  It’s impossible to forget what they do [to us].  It doesn’t matter what the reason is.  I am simply on the side of the Jewish people!!!  And so may it continue forever!

…I will not let Arab lovers [like Ido]  destroy the fulfilled life I live.

H/t Ofer Neiman.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Im Tirzu Accuses Israeli Blogger of Incitement to Murder

Thursday, August 19th, 2010
yossi gurvitz

Yossi Gurvitz, my friend and alleged inciter to murder

My friend, Dena Shunra brought me word of the amazing news that our mutual friend, Yossi Gurvitz, who writes the Hebrew language blog, Friends of George, has been accused of incitment to murder.  Though I have never met Yossi personally, from the writing in his blog and his picture there, he appears to be a pipe-smoking, bohemian (possibly) and totally harmless (physically) individual.  How the lunatics of Im Tirzu can turn him into a potential murderer is little short of astounding.

It appears that Yossi is caught up in a larger game Im Tirzu is playing in which it seeks to smear New Israel Fund, a battle that has raged in Israel for months.  I’ve reported here on the Shturmer-like demonization to which Naomi Hazan was subjected in the pages of all the major Israeli newspapers.  Well, it appears that Yossi spoke at a New Israeli Fund conference for Israeli bloggers in which, according to the rightist Yisrael HaYom, he said he was eager to “get to the meat of the matter and do battle with Im Tirzu.”  He further clarified that what he meant was to unmask the group’s funding sources.  In Hebrew, he used the term basar va’dam, meaning “body and blood” or, as I translated, meat of the matter.  So this is how a bunch of total meshugayim transform a call to political battle into a death threat.  Amazing, simply amazing.

I’ve got news for Im Tirzu–these guys are political neophytes or poseurs if they interpret that as a death threat.  I can send them some of mine, a few of which have been reported to the FBI, if they want to know the real thing.  The most recent one was posted recently by a Los Angeles commenter named Bacci40 at The Magnes Zionist:

…must kill dickie to know that he is irrelevant.

Now, that’s a death threat.

Yossi, enjoy the notoriety and may it bring you added visibility for your worthy commentary on the Orwellian threats to Israeli democracy.

Houston Jewish Federation, Jewish Agency Fund Im Tirzu’s Assault on Israeli Universities

Tuesday, August 17th, 2010
hagee gift to im tirzu

Gifts by John Hagee and Central Fund of Israel to Im Tirzu

What do the Houston Jewish federation, the Jewish Agency, John Hagee, and Im Tirzu have in common?  They’re all either directly or indirectly funding a major assault on academic freedom on Israeli campuses.

Im Tirzu is on the warpath once again.  Not to be outdone by the BDS movement, one of whose tools is an academic boycott of Israel, the Israeli rightist group has threatened the president of Ben Gurion University–if she doesn’t depose the current leadership of the political science department and reform the “anti-Zionist” syllabi of its courses that it will begin a campaign to convince donors to stop giving and students to stop enrolling.

Since the Knesset is considering a cockamamie bill punishing any Israeli who supports a boycott of Israel, perhaps the good solons might want to consider including Im Tirzu in the list of those who could be punished.  I’d think that supporting an academic/fundraising boycott of Ben Gurion University might enable faculty there to make a plausible legal case that their institution suffered tangible damaged by Im Tirzu’s assault.

The Israeli finance website, Calcalist, reports (Hebrew) that John Hagee donated $120,000 to Im Tirzu in 2009 through the Jewish Agency.  The money had been transferred to the Agency by the Houston Jewish Federation as part of an overall $5-million gift.  $3-million of that came from CUFI and went towards its largely pro-settler Israel philanthropy.  Hagee passed the gift through the Agency in order to qualify for a U.S. tax deduction.  The Israeli site also notes that the Central Fund of Israel, a pro-settler fund supported by American Jews, donated $35,000 as well.  I reported some of this earlier in this post.  But what I’m trying to discover is whether the funds reported on by the Calcalist are independent of the $200,000 in Hagee gifts I reported earlier.  I suspect that they may be since there was no mention concerning the earlier gift that it was a pass-through via the Jewish Agency.

The Israeli website notes that the Agency is only supposed to act as pass-through for donations to “non-political” Israeli groups.  I wonder how they fudge this one concerning one of the most hardline political groups currently functioning in Israel?  Further the Agency is only supposed to accept funds for projects that are directly connected to its work.  So does this mean that Im Tirzu is a project under the official auspices of the Agency?  Or has someone there fudged those inconvenient rules again?  Further, the funds provided to the Zionist-Brut group were supposed to be used for “educational” purposes.  Instead, they were used to support political activism.  They went for salaries and covering other organizational expenses.

Is it any accident that the Jewish Agency’s chair is Natan Sharansky, doyen of the Israeli right, and affiliated with the Likudist Shalem Center.  The latter is heavily funded by American Jewish gambling magnate Shelly Adelson, an ardent funder of Bibi Netnayahu’s political career.

A second article in the Calcalist makes this important point:

The Jewish Agency supports organization’s from the Israeli lunatic right, which are attempting to destroy the values of academic freedom in Israeli higher education.  The Agency, a body whose mission it is to bring new immigrants to settle in the Holy Land, instead transfers very large sums to poisonous organizations which seek legitimacy in attacking academics who’ve actually done something in their lives, having not just written propaganda exposes divorced from any reality.

The columnist concludes by noting the absolute insanity of the Jewish Agency providing funding to an organization that wishes to unleash the thought police on Israeli universities.  You’d think the Agency’s mandate would be to improve the quality of life in Israel rather than attempt to destroy one of the jewels of the Israeli state (well, perhaps a bit tarnished, but still the universities are key national institutions).

Will anyone in Israel make Ronen Shoval and his jackbooted friends in Im Tirzu explain why they are accepting a single kopek from a crazy Texas preacher who says Hitler was half-Jewish, that the latter and the Holocaust were sent by God in order to create the State of Israel, and that the Rothschild’s were part of an international economic conspiracy???

Israel Wakes Up and Discovers Its Soldiers Abuse Palestinians

Tuesday, August 17th, 2010
eden aberjil

Eden Aberjil's Facebook images captioned: 'Army service, the most wonderful time of my life!'

Yesterday, a major scandal erupted in Israel over an IDF soldier, Eden Aberjil, who posted pictures on her Facebook account of her abusing bound Palestinian prisoners.  All Israel appears to be SHOCKED, I say shocked, to discover that its soldiers actually taunt and gloat over Palestinians in such a way.  It appears that such Israelis either don’t remember their own service in the Territories or are so old that their service predates the Intifada.  Examples of such photos are so widespread both online and privately that the real shock is that anyone IS shocked.

This scandalized reaction is further indication of the absolute disconnect between Israelis and the Occupation.  I hate to say this, but they are little better than the neighbors of the concentration camps who saw no evil and heard no evil.  It is all too easy in Israel now to be a nice liberal who tut-tuts when confronted by such images as Aberjil displayed, but who would far prefer to have the Occupation exist in some foreign or alien space they don’t visit either physically or mentally.

The IDF proclaims itself scandalized that one of its members would misbehave in such a fashion.  The company line is that its soldiers simply do not do such things. And if one does, that soldier is violating military procedure and discipline.  The entire response is a sham, a virtual Potemkin village of fine moral statements which conceal a nasty, brutish Occupation in the background.

The army is talking about disciplining Aberjil for her actions, which is utter bullshit.  There are literally thousands, if not tens of thousands of pictures out there with virtually the same content; the same blindfolded Palestinians, the same smiling IDF soldiers besides them.  Will the IDF prosecute all of them?

I hate to be a broken record but there is only one way to end this moral scandal and it isn’t by putting Aberjil on KP duty for a week.  It’s to end the Occupation entirely so that Israel’s children won’t be put in such situations to begin with.  We can see from Abu Graibh and Guantanamo that Israelis are neither better nor worse than any other occupying soldiers.  When one country occupies another the occupier victimizes the occupied.  The story is as old as the history of human warfare.  The way to stop this is to end the conflict.

Disabled Palestinian youth trapped by teargas

If you don’t believe me about the prevalence of these abusive images online then check out this Facebook site, which displays many such images taken from the Facebook group devoted to the Israeli Border Police, a particularly nasty, brutish branch of miltiary service.  It’s a pity that few of you can read Hebrew as the comments under these images are in some cases more revolting than the images.

To her credit, Aberjil has defended herself rather than bowed her head as the IDF would no doubt prefer.  It’s possible that once they work her over a bit and make her realize how much they can damage her future that she will put her tail between her legs and tell the world what a bad girl she was promising never to do it again.  But right now, she’s professing her innocence (somewhat disingenuously I might add).  The N.Y. Times quotes her as saying:

[She] said that the “pictures were taken in good will, there was no statement in them.” She added that they were not intended to humiliate the prisoners but merely to document her “military experience,” and that she had no idea they “would be problematic.”

Which is terribly disingenuous when you know that among her comments on her pictures were disparaging remarks about the Palestinian prisoners genitals.  I think it would be far better for her to argue that she did nothing that the average IDF draftee doesn’t do virtually every day of service.  They certainly see and participate in such degrading events and sometimes they even document them on video or through photographs.  Here is a sampling from a Facebook group founded to feature these images.

Among the comments for the photo:

“One of the funniest days–I can still remember there were about 100 disabled people in wheelchairs and as we began to shoot at them they all suddenly became healthy and began to run.”

“Ha, ha, ha–let’s see you with three stun grenades in your wheelchair if you don’t get up and start to run.”

The follow-up story from The Lede linked above provides comprehensive background documentation of the psychological damage that the Occupation inflicts on Israeli soldiers (and by extension Palestinians as well).

Performance Optimization WordPress Plugins by W3 EDGE