Mahzor

New York Public Library

Churches

Sarajevo Haggadah

Mah Nishtanah

Sarajevo haggadah

Antaea Darom

Israeli women's art

Action

Torah as music

Ben Heine

Action

ceramic bowl

Mohammad Said Kalash, "Offering Reconciliation" exhibit (photo: Ilan Amihai)

Action

Punch and Judy/Pinchas and Jamila

Avi Katz

Action

David Grossman

Ben Heine

Action

Eldrige Street shul

Lower East Side

Action

Dove

Ben Heine

Action

Two birds

Hoda Jamal

Action

Israeli and Palestinian boys

from documentary, Promises

Action

Cat in the Hat

Yiddish version

Action

Daylight through the Wall

Banksy: graffiti art on Separation Wall

Action

Maurice Sendak's Brundibar set

New Victory Theater (photo: Nan Melville/NYT)

Action

Daniel Barenboim, West-Eastern Divan Orchestra

Palestinian-Israeli musical ensemble (photo: Kerstin Joensson/AP)

Action

Great Day on Eldrige Street

N.Y.'s klezmer greats celebrate shul rededication (photo: Leo Sorel)

Action

Joint Appeal for Peace

(Avi Katz)

Joint Appeal for Peace

Ketubah, Ancona, Italy (1772)

(Jewish Theological Seminary library)

Ancona ketubah

Archive for June, 2010

Shin Bet Abuses Secret Gag Order in Yet Another Arrest of Palestinian Activist

Wednesday, June 16th, 2010

Haaretz's 'disappeared' article about Mohammad Namarna

Haaretz and other Israeli sites announced that a 20 year-old Israeli Palestinian, Mohhamad Namarna, was arrested under suspicion of membership in a banned organization.  Given that he’s from northern Israel, the organization would likely be Hezbollah.  The Haaretz report noted that the story had been under gag order, but that it had been revoked.  Then the story was scrubbed from the site.  Apparently, the Shin Bet wasn’t satisfied that they’d prevented Israelis from knowing why he was arrested; they also wanted to prevent them from knowing he was arrested at all.

Bizarrely enough, the story is still accessible on the Maariv site and here at Tapuz.  I wish the spooks would make up their minds whether Namarna is a desaparecido or merely a terrorist.

The Maariv item reads:

It is approved to report that the central unit of the metropolitan Galilee police arrested Mohammad Namarna, 20, from Arava, under suspicion of involvement in a security case investigated by the police and Shin Bet.  The police related that the rest of the details of the case are under gag order.

Why would Haaretz have taken down such a story but Maariv not?

It’s hard to know whether Namarna is the Mr. X I’ve been reporting on.  I doubt it, since I believe the latter has been imprisoned at Ayalon prison for some time and Namarna’s arrest.  What we have here is yet another example of the Shin Bet running roughshod over not just the rights of the particular person arrested, but of the rights of the citizens to know why he was arrested and what are the charges against him.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Israeli Border Police Summarily Execute Palestinian Hit and Run Driver

Tuesday, June 15th, 2010
ziad jilani

Ziad Jilani, Palestinian executed by Border Police after hit and run accident

How’s this for “driving while Arab?”  Now, keep in mind that for the first day or so that this story was reported in Israel, the driver was a terrorist attempting to kill police officers:

A motorist from East Jerusalem who ran over and wounded several Border Police officers Friday was shot twice in the face from close range while still lying on the ground, eyewitnesses said. Neighborhood witnesses said the fatal shots were fired once the officers no longer had reason to fear that their lives were in danger, and could have easily arrested the suspect.

Witnesses in the East Jerusalem neighborhood of Wadi Joz told Haaretz that the motorist, Ziad Jilani, suddenly swerved his car and hit the group of officers walking further up the road. They said, however, that they believed the collision was an accident, and not committed intentionally as initially reported.

…Around 2 P.M. Friday, Jilani was driving his van home from prayers in nearby Shoafat…A number of other officers were deployed around the area, and several started making their way toward Jerusalem’s Old City. Jilani’s car was traveling in tightly packed, slow-moving traffic with no oncoming vehicles.

The neighborhood soon filled up with people returning from Friday prayers, and some stores were already being opened. Two eyewitnesses said stones were hurled at the officers, one of which struck Jilani’s car. He then swerved his car left, they said, veering from its lane and striking the group of policemen.

Shots were heard immediately, another witness told Haaretz, and one of the officers fell to the ground. Two policemen tended to him until an ambulance arrived, and the other officers got in their vehicles and began pursuing Jilani, who had continued driving after the collision, and shooting at his car.

Another witness said that he had not seen stones thrown, but rather believed Jilani had tried to overtake the vehicles in front of him. Several other witnesses said the windshield of Jilani’s car had been shattered, but were unsure if the damage had been caused by a bullet or a stone.

Jilani turned his vehicle into a dead-end alley where his uncle lives, and the officers continued pursuing his vehicle and shooting.

A mother and her adult daughter present at the scene saw the man emerge from his car. The daughter told Haaretz, “I was further down the alley, and I heard shots … I saw a car driving, followed by many police officers. The car stopped right next to me, and someone got out. I saw him next to the car door, and he looked at me with an expression I didn’t really understand, but I will never forget.

“There was shooting and I started to scream,” the woman continued. “My mother ran toward me and threw me to the ground. Everything happened within seconds. I realized he wasn’t walking normally, and saw the shattered windshield of the car, maybe from a stone. He ran until he fell over,” she said…

“He got out of the car, and they came after him. Not just one of them shot, but many of them, and then they started yelling in Hebrew for people to go back into their homes,” the daughter said.

Both women said they saw Jilani lying on his stomach with several officers gathered around him, and the daughter said one of the policemen kicked him in the head. The mother said she saw an officer point his rifle extremely close to Jilani’s head, and when she put her head down to the asphalt she heard a shot ring out.

That’s the notorious Israeli “kill shot”many have written about which is normally used in counter-terror operations and regular IDF patrols when soldiers are commanded to execute wounded Palestinians.

Here’s the Border Police’s non-response response:

A Border Police spokesman, Chief Superintendent Moshe Pinchi, did not comment on the questions posed to him by Haaretz. In his response, Pinchi wrote, “Individuals have been killed and dozens wounded in vehicle attacks in Jerusalem between 2008 and 2009 … All of those attacks were committed by East Jerusalem residents, and in each case those close to the perpetrators described the incidents as ‘accidents.’

“Four Border Police officers were wounded in this last incident in Wadi Joz and hospitalized for treatment, and only by a miracle were fatalities avoided,” he said.

Not a word about the execution.  Also, no proof provided that any of the incidents reported by him were proven to be terror attacks.  The assumption, as always with the Border Police, is that any Arab is a likely terrorist and any Arab driving a car has a lethal weapon and is willing to use it.  The Border Police have a well-deserved reputation among Israelis for extreme brutality against Palestinians.

Now, the Police are attempting to question Jilani’s widow, who is a U.S. citizen in an attempt to prove he had terror motives.  This is appalling.  Why don’t they investigate the policeman who executed Jilani?

All I can say is thank God we have Amira Hass reporting stories like this.  Without her, we’d know next to nothing about what really goes on in the Territories.

Israel’s Geriatric Gaza Flotilla Investigation: the Fix is In

Tuesday, June 15th, 2010

Dvorit Shargel has collected some damning information from the Israeli media about the biased views of the commission chair, 75 year-old Justice Yaakov Tirkel and the lucidity of a 93 year-old member, Shabtai Rosenne.

Yediot Achronot writes:

The judge heading up the Gaza flotilla investigation is known in his rulings as someone who says “Yes” to the security services.  He also protects freedom of speech–as long as its not connected to state security.

Tirkel notes that his legal rulings do not originate in a theoretical legal laboratory, but derive from a set of nationalist and humanist values.  When there is a conflict between the two, Tirkel continues:

With great sorrow, I view the honor and freedom of our fighters  as more dear than those of the enemy’s fighters.

Shabbtai Rozen in pjs

93 year-old Shabbtai Rozen: caption reads (unintentionally ironically) 'The professor is ready' (Maariv)

I think we’ve heard enough, haven’t you?

And what can you say about poor Shabtai Rosenne, no doubt once an eminent Israeli diplomat and scholar of international law.  But must they dust this fellow off in his nursing home and trot him out before the cameras in his summer pajamas along with his Filipino caretaker?  Must they?  I would never make the mistake of saying a 93 year-old can’t be sharp as a tack, but I’d suggest for a delicate mission such as this one, that propping up someone like this and sitting him in a chair for this panel was a ludicrous exercise.

An interview with him makes him appear equally out to lunch:

Modern communication is limitless.  You can receive a protocol from the defense ministry six hours after the end of the meeting.  It’s simply fantastic!

Then we have the case of the 86 year-old Amos Horev, a distinguished Israeli general with impeccable intelligence credentials and a booster of the Israeli defense industry.  I’ve already written about the built in conflict of interest of having an Israeli general sit in judgment of the IDF.  Now we have the added question of why Bibi Netnayhau felt the need for representation from the geriatric set on the panel.  At least, Horev had his picture taken in a sports jacket without his caretaker (if he has one) present.

Turkey has wisely denounced the commission even before its first meeting as a sham.  Haaretz in an editorial has done the same.  They know the fix is in.  Why doesn’t Obama?  I hope he has a Plan B, because this ain’t the solution to resolving the Mavi Marmara crisis.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Israel’s Mysterious Mr. X, Prisoner With No Name is Alleged ‘Terrorist’

Monday, June 14th, 2010
prison bars

Mr. X: prisoner with no name is accused 'terrorist' (Martin Godwin)

Yesterday, I reported that Yediot Achronot published a story about an Israeli prisoner who, according to informants in the prison service, had no name, no identity, no contact with the outside world or fellow prisoners.  He seemed truly to be a disappeared person in the midst of a country that likes to think of itself as a democracy.  And true to form, the article about Mr. X, as the article dubbed him, disappeared!  Yesterday, I agreed with Israeli blogger Yossi Gurvitz in conjecturing that the article had run afoul of the intelligence services who secured a gag order banning publication of any information about him.

An Israeli journalist today reports to me that a source, also within the prison service, confirms Yossi and I were right.  Not only is there a gag order against publishing anything about Mr. X, there is a ban on revealing that there is a gag order of any kind.  It’s a kind of double-bind theory of Israeli spookdom.

The source described Mr X as “a terrorist from one of the organizations.”  This would likely mean that Mr. X was either a Palestinian from Israel or the West Bank, either accused of terrorism or belonging to a proscribed organization like Islamic Jihad, Hezbollah or Hamas.

Now, think about this.  A man is imprisoned for no one knows what.  Not only can’t any Israeli report on who he is or what he has done.  You can’t even report that he EXISTS.  We’re talking Scaresville here.  But Israel has become such a hardened national security state that almost no one there would find anything wrong with this picture.

If we in the U.S. want to conjecture where outrages like Guantanamo, Bagram, Abu Ghraib, etc. can lead we should look no farther than Mr. X.  No matter what this man may have done (and again, we don’t have a clue whether he is guilty of anything), society–whether Israel or the U.S.– is totally corrupted when it disappears people in such a way.

I’ve absorbed my share of body blows from the pro-Israel far-right and now it’s happened at the Israeli gossip site Rotter, which has a section called Scoops.  I post some of my newsworthy Israel reporting there.  A member responded to a message which linked to my last post about Mr. X, with this tender endearment:

Perhaps you’ll stop flacking your anti-Semitic site, Silverstein?

You’ve never published a single thing in your whole sordid life.  You’ve stolen from other sites and taken credit in order to flack for your leftist, jihadist, murderous, extremist, fly by night, uber-radical, sick site.

I do so love the smell of napalm in the morning!  When they hate you like this you know you’re striking a nerve and a blow for a democratic and just Israel.

Israeli Chair of Gaza Flotilla Attack Investigation Doesn’t Believe It Should Exist

Monday, June 14th, 2010
yaakov tirkel

Supreme Court justice Yaakov Tirkel to chair Gaza panel, whose premises he disputes (Haaretz)

This is getting damned strange. The Obama administration and Israel have been haggling for a week over the nature and composition of the supposedly independent commission which will investigate the Gaza flotilla disaster. We hear that the U.S. demanded that someone of judicial “stature” like a Supreme Court justice be appointed as chair. Bibi finally acquiesced and appointed Justice Yaakov Tirkel. But there’s one problem. The incoming panel chair doesn’t seem to believe in the panel. Here is how Haaretz characterized the judge’s remarks in a searing editorial attacking the commission:

Netanyahu’s panel will have no powers, not even those of a government probe, and its proposed chairman does not believe in such a panel. In an interview to Army Radio, Tirkel said there is no choice but to establish a state committee of inquiry. He opposed bringing in foreign observers and made clear that he is not a devotee of drawing conclusions about individuals and dismissing those responsible for failures. When a Haaretz reporter confronted Tirkel about these remarks, the former justice evaded the question saying, “I don’t remember what I said.

One of the two international “observers” David Trimble, is a co-founder of the newly launched Israel advocacy group, Friends of Israel, joining John Bolton, Dore Gold, and Spain’s former right-wing prime minister, Jose Aznar.  At its founding, the group released this statement:

This initiative “is promoted by people who are not Jewish and whose motivations are based on the deep conviction that Israel is part of the Western world. In fact, today Israel is a fundamental actor for the future of the West. Although the peace process is important, the members of Friends of Israel Initiative are more concerned about the onslaught of radical Islamism as well as the specter of a nuclear Iran since these are threats affecting not only Israel, but the entire world.

…The sponsors of this Initiative believe there is no West without Israel.”

Ironically, Friends of Israel announced its inauguration the day after the Mavi Marmara massacre.  Can anyone possibly believe that David Trimble is a disinterested party capable of sitting in judgment (even as an observer) of the IDF’s behavior in this matter?

Also joining the Israeli investigative panel will be an IDF major general.  Does anyone detect a slight conflict of interest here?  How can a senior officer of the IDF sit in judgment of the IDF in what is supposed to be an “independent” panel?

Haaretz’ editorial also called the flotilla investigative body a “farce:”

The government’s efforts to avoid a thorough and credible investigation of the flotilla affair seem more and more like a farce. The conclusions of an ostensible probe are intended to justify retroactively the decision to blockade Gaza, to forcibly stop the Turkish aid flotilla in international waters and to use deadly force on the deck of the Mavi Marmara.

To make the costume seem credible, the Prime Minister’s Bureau asked a retired Supreme Court justice, Yaakov Tirkel, to chair the committee. Alongside him will sit foreign observers in order to legitimize the conclusions in international public opinion.

…As far as Netanyahu is concerned, it will be enough for television channels to broadcast footage of dark-suited jurists, and politicians addressing them, to present the semblance of an “examination.”

The Obama administration, ever willing to throw out a lifeline to Israel’s right-wing government, welcomed the fraudulent panel:

…The White House press secretary issued a statement hailing the Israeli announcement as an “important step forward.” The statement added that “the structure and terms of reference of Israel’s proposed independent public commission can meet the standard of a prompt, impartial, credible and transparent investigation,” as sought by the United Nations Security Council.

“But,” the White House cautioned, “we will not prejudge the process or its outcome and will await the conduct and findings of the investigation before drawing further conclusions.”

He better give himself that “out,” as this panel will satisfy no one but the B-boys, Bibi and (possibly) Barack.

Enhanced by Zemanta

The Strange Case of Israel’s Mr. X, the Prisoner With No Name

Sunday, June 13th, 2010

This Yediot story about a prisoner with no name disappeared from the site likely as a result of a secret gag order

the man with no name
When I first started writing about the Anat Kamm case it felt like a cross between Kafka’s The Trial, a carnival Hall of Mirrors, and Chelm.  Now comes a story possibly even stranger.

Earlier today, Yediot Achronot published a story about a Mr. X imprisoned in an Israeli jail.  The man was in solitary confinement.  His jailers did not know who he was, did not share a word with him, no one came to visit him.  No one seemed to know he was there.  They didn’t even know what crime he had committed or how he came to be in the prison.  His prison cell was completely isolated from other prisoners and he couldn’t communicate in any way with them.  He was a complete mystery.  How is this possible in the Only Democracy in the Middle East?

“He is in absolute isolation from the external world,” said a source in the prison service.  “I’m not aware of any other prisoner held in such grave conditions of isolation.  In Unit 15 [where he is held], everything concerning him is secret. There are too many secrets concerning him.  What frightens is that a man can be imprisoned in Israel in 2010 and no one knows anything about him.  The man simply has no name and no identity.  We don’t even know if he has rights accorded to all other prisoners in the prison system.”

The reporter asked the service who the man was and they refused to answer.  The spokesperson would only say that his agency does not provide any information about prisoners for security reasons.  Which would seem to imply that his case is related to national security.  At the popular Israeli news forum, Rotter, some speculate that he may be a spy.

To indicate the severity of the unidentified prisoner’s offenses the cell and unit in which he is currently held was built specifically for Yigal Amir, the assassin of Israel’s prime minister.  Amir was removed to another prison.  But unlike Amir, whose family visited him regularly in this cell, Mr. X sees no one and no one sees him.

Sometime after I read this story I noticed it had disappeared from the Yediot website, which is why I offer a screenshot from Yahoo! cache.  This can mean only one thing, that the Israel censor demanded that the story be yanked.  Which only deepens the mystery.  Clearly, this individual committed (or let’s say, was convicted of committing) some security related offense, and probably a grave one.  But for the prison service not even to know who they’re guarding or even have heard a rumor about his identity seems exceedingly strange.

A commenter named Haggai below reports:

Rumours from a good source say this is a Mosad agent, suspected of espionage, and allowed to see no one but other Mosad agents.

That would sound about right. But can one imprison a Mossad agent without trial and without the world knowing the man is imprisoned? Can he simply disappear off the face of the earth like this?

Yossi Gurvitz speculates (Hebrew)  that what happened was that when the article was presented to the IDF censor, it was approved since it did not pose an imminent danger to national security (the only grounds for imposing such censorship).  But after publication, an intelligence agency (he speculates military intelligence) went to court and secured a gag order prohibiting publication, which explains the article’s removal.  It would, of course, be embarrassing to whichever agency helped put this man behind bars for the public to know what it had done.  Better not only to erase any trace of the man’s name or identity, but the article about him as well.  What a country!

Israel’s supporters like to claim it is the Only Democracy in the Middle East.  But Israel is really a national security state in which the normal rules of democracy can be suspended seemingly at will once the dreaded phrases “terror” or “national security” are invoked.  Mr. X is Exhibit A proving my point.

Thanks to Didi Remez for translating the entire Yediot article into English.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Barak Cancels French Visit for Fear of Arrest Involving Gaza Flotilla Attack

Sunday, June 13th, 2010
Ehud Barak in Rememberance Day (Yom HaZikaron)...

Barak cancelled French trip for fear of arrest (Image via Wikipedia)

Ehud Barak’s office announced tonight that he had cancelled a planned trip to France, where he was to take part in the dedication of the Israeli pavillion at the Eurosatory International Defense Week there and have consultations with the French foreign and defense ministers.  The purported reason for the cancellation as relayed by his spokesperson, was that he had to remain in Israel to help assemble the panel of experts to investigate the Gaza flotilla massacre.

A confidential Israeli source informs me (and AP confirms)  that the real reason was that Palestinian activists in France had filed legal complaints against him over his involvement in the flotilla affair.  He was afraid he might be arrested.

I understand as well that his advance security detail discovered an inordinate number of pudgy dark-skinned tennis players in dark glasses running around the hotel where he planned to stay.  For those lacking a sense of satire, that was a joke.

I have written a number of times here about the international campaign demanding accountability for Israel’s behavior.  The more outrageous the acts that country engages in the more its leaders will be constrained from exercising their right to travel abroad to defend those acts.  Both BDS and the use of international law have contributed to an ostracism of Israel on the world stage.  If Israel continues along the path it has chosen this will only get worse.

That is why the Israeli government and its right wing apologists like Alan Dershowitz, Elie Wiesel, Gerald Steinberg and Im Tirtzu have so savagely attacked the Goldstone Report, Judge Goldstone and the Israeli human rights NGO community.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Eli Lake Calls for ‘Regime Change’ in Gaza, ‘Strategic Communications War’ Against Hamas

Sunday, June 13th, 2010


The NY Times features excerpted conversations with political bloggers on various topics via an agreement with BloggingheadsTV.  Very infrequently, they will host a discussion about the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.  My friend, Helena Cobban has been a guest I know.

Today, the Times features a rather shocking “debate” (more like mutual admiration society) between Heather Hurlburt of the National Security Network and Eli Lake of the Washington Times titled (I kid you not), A Smarter War on Hamas.   Pardon me, but isn’t the lesson Israel and the U.S. have learned over the past four years is that there is no such thing as a “smart war” or any type of war that will topple Hamas?  Neither overt war nor collective siege have done it.  So here you have a self-professed Irish-American and Jewish neocon (not a Palestinian or even Arab to be seen among the bunch–Edward Said where are you when we need you?) debating the best way to foment regime change against Hamas.

This dialogue is a perfect reflection of the impoverishment of debate about these issues in the American media and within the Beltway think-tank world where these people operate  And their views are amply reflected within the administration, which explains why Obama is still spinning his wheels in terms of making any impact related to Gaza or U.S. policy there.  Hurlburt and Lake are engaged in a dialogue of the deaf.  Lake especially is a prisoner of his own deeply help prejudices and distorted notions of what U.S. policy should be.

I half-jokingly call his policy: let them eat cardamon.

Can you imagine anything stupider than advocating regime change against Hamas or saying Israel didn’t go far enough in Operation Cast Lead and should’ve toppled Hamas altogether (which would’ve demanded an Israeli re-occupation)?  What can you say about someone who claims that Israel’s problem is that it can’t be cruel enough in its wars against the Palestinians?

Here are excerpts of their comments (audiostream of expanded discussion) about the aftermath of the Gaza flotilla attack (pardon my editorial intrusions in brackets–I just couldn’t help myself):

Lake: There’s this problem of Gaza…how do you satisfy Israel’s security concerns and…how do you allow cardamon and cinnamon to get to the 1.5-million people who live in Gaza.  It’s a very, very, very hard question.  It all comes back to the fact that there needs to be a policy for political regime change for Gaza.  You have to do something about Hamas.  You have to see a situation in which Hamas can moderate–I don’t know how that’s going to happen; or you have to force an election and hopefully they lose it.  It comes back to this sore of the people who rule Gaza.

Hurlburt: Except that if you want to replace Hamas or modify it, you would have to start with creating the conditions in which Hamas could be discredited and another force could emerge.  At the moment you have a situation in which Hamas is the source of everything good which happens in Gaza…you’re making it much harder on yourself than it needs to be.  Actually finding some ways to ease the blockade, to allow a little more independence to emerge, to allow a little more commerce between the West Bank and Gaza, to allow Abbas to have a few more victories and make himself look a little better.

You’d be idiotic to try to stage an election in Gaza right now.  Every time you begin to think Hamas is becoming discredited something like the flotilla happens.  And you think anybody would vote against Hamas now?

Lake: It would sure be nice if there were Palestinians around Fayyad who were in the Palestinian diaspora who were on Fayyad’s side who could really begin in Arabic a campaign of political warfare against Hamas starting with…the moral idiots in Europe who think that Hamas is in some ways progressive.

It would be nice if there were Palestinians who could say: “Your support for Hamas is exacerbating my dispossession.”  It becomes weird as an Ashkenazi Jew in America saying that [Gee, dya think?].  That is a true statement.  If you talk to the American Task Force for Palestine…

There are so many Palestinians who look at Hamas as an obstacle ultimately to a Palestinian state.  The problem is that there is this misplaced solidarity particularly in Europe, but also in the Arab world, with Hamas, which is seen as more virtuous; obviously they were seen as less corrupt than Fatah during the peace process.  I hope that that shine can come off.  I can’t imagine that some clever Palestinians in Norway or the United States or Toronto  with web savvy could begin to take advantage of it.  It would be nice to see the strategic communications war turned on Hamas.

Hurlburt: I agree with you that that would be desirable.  But it’s incredibly chutzpadik of comfortable American commentators to call for it [Gee, dya think?]  And we’ve seen in the past that whenver there’s an intimation that anyone from the U.S. is thinking about it, it’s incredibly damaging to those Palestinians who would be willing on their own to undertake such a thing…

Lake: It would be nice for the Arab media to start to put Hamas on the spot.  They’ve been in charge of Gaza now since 2007.  What have they done for the people of Gaza?  What have they done for the dream of a Palestinian state?  What have they done about Palestinian dispossession?  What have they done about the depravity of these conditions?

Hurlburt: I would like to see more people able to do more for the people of Gaza–deeds on the ground.

Lake: I think you can do things on the margin about it, but this is still going to be a major problem if the party in charge of Gaza is formally and in every sense at war with Israel.  I don’t think you’re going to have any peace, any agreement as long as Hamas is in the picture.

Hurlburt: It’s not going to be possible to get Hamas out of the picture in any time-frame that’s going to be of any interest to you or me in terms of peacemaking.

Lake: You can look back at Operation Cast Lead and see that Israel’s decision not to take out Hamas may’ve been a cruel mistake because you can’t get anywhere as long as they’re in charge.  If you’re going to make a decision to do Cast Lead go all the way.  This is the classic problem with the Israelis.  They can never be as cruel as Hafez al Assad or Hussein or other Arab leaders in the region because they just can’t be.  They try to be half-way cruel, or one-quarter as cruel and it ends up infuriating the world and losing the respect [!] of their adversary

What was BloggingheadsTV thinking when they put this panel together?  God only knows.  But the fact that they not only did so but featured it on the NY Times website is indicative of the abject bankruptcy of U.S. media and the political echelon in terms of coming up with any viable policy toward Hamas.  We’re at sea (to continue the Gaza flotilla metaphor) and getting more and more seasick by the minute.

I’ve written to Robert Wright, BloggingheadsTV’s co-founder expressing my distress at this editorial choice.  We’ll see what if anything he says.

Enhanced by Zemanta
Performance Optimization WordPress Plugins by W3 EDGE