Mahzor

New York Public Library

Churches

Sarajevo Haggadah

Mah Nishtanah

Sarajevo haggadah

Antaea Darom

Israeli women's art

Action

Torah as music

Ben Heine

Action

ceramic bowl

Mohammad Said Kalash, "Offering Reconciliation" exhibit (photo: Ilan Amihai)

Action

Punch and Judy/Pinchas and Jamila

Avi Katz

Action

David Grossman

Ben Heine

Action

Eldrige Street shul

Lower East Side

Action

Dove

Ben Heine

Action

Two birds

Hoda Jamal

Action

Israeli and Palestinian boys

from documentary, Promises

Action

Cat in the Hat

Yiddish version

Action

Daylight through the Wall

Banksy: graffiti art on Separation Wall

Action

Maurice Sendak's Brundibar set

New Victory Theater (photo: Nan Melville/NYT)

Action

Daniel Barenboim, West-Eastern Divan Orchestra

Palestinian-Israeli musical ensemble (photo: Kerstin Joensson/AP)

Action

Great Day on Eldrige Street

N.Y.'s klezmer greats celebrate shul rededication (photo: Leo Sorel)

Action

Joint Appeal for Peace

(Avi Katz)

Joint Appeal for Peace

Ketubah, Ancona, Italy (1772)

(Jewish Theological Seminary library)

Ancona ketubah

Archive for April, 2010

Cozy Relationship Between Israeli Judiciary, Military Facilitates Gag Orders, Other Free Speech Violations

Monday, April 5th, 2010
Israeli gag order

Israeli gag order

Yediot republishes Judy Miller's 'Israeli Censorship Scandal' story with black-outs

There is much that is instructive in the Anat Kam case about the deficiencies in Israeli democracy.  I’ve discussed many of them in earlier posts.  Tonight, I want to talk about the overly cozy relationship between the judiciary and the military-intelligence apparatus.  Let’s say you’re the Shin Bet or the Attorney General and you’ve got a case like the one we’re talking about.  You want a gag order.  Complicated?  Hardly.  In fact, about as easy as getting a warrantless NSA wiretap during the Bush administration.

Let’s take the Kam matter as a case in point.  The prosecution couldn’t have found a more willing judicial accomplice than the rather rotund Judge Einat Ron whose online bio describes her legal experience.  She served in the military prosecutor’s office in varied capacities beginning as a prosecuting attorney and concluding as a military judge.  She was named as a judge to the Petah Tikvah court in 2007.  Before this she had NO experience in the civilian justice system.  How’s that for venue shopping?

An Israeli journalist friend informs me that Yediot Achronot has republished Judy Miller’s story (h/t to Didi Remez for the pdf) in The Daily Beast about this case.  However, it has blacked out about half the original piece because it might violate the gag order (they thankfully didn’t excise my name or my blog’s name, but almost all my interview quote was blacked out, which is a bit excessive since I didn’t mention Kam in the passage Miller quoted in her original article).  I’ve been reading Israeli newspapers and I can’t recall a time when such a thing happened.  But this case has made for numerous unfortunate “firsts” in the annals of suppression of Israeli free speech.  My Israeli readers who are more experienced in reading their papers, can tell me if they recall things differently.

Einat Ron, judge who granted Kam gag order

Usually, the military censor (which is slightly different than a gag order) works much more subtly.  Newspapers don’t reveal their negotiations or dealings with the censor.  So you don’t know what material was in a story originally.  You don’t know which stories are axed by the censor.  You don’t know if a story was approved by the censor.  But in a situation like this Yediot wants their readers to know in the most public way possible that they are subject to such censorship.  But let’s not begin singing hosannahs yet to Israel’s free press.  When Yediot publishes such a story without blackouts, then we can celebrate.  Even better, when it sends its reporters out to investigate and break the story itself, then we can really celebrate.  Until then, we can only commiserate (if you’re sympathetic) or rail against the media’s collaboration with the authorities in maintaining this oppressive regime.

Ben Gurion University professor Zvi Solow just sent me this interesting e-mail, which he wishes me to emphasize consists of his personal opinion.  It also taught me a wonderful Hebrew word I hadn’t heard:

The IDF censor is now on the radio trying to defend herself attacking the press as “irresponsible” and anyway she’s is only “trying to preserve the security of Israel”. The majority opinion here is that the whole thing is shlemieliut [from the Yiddish shlemiel, or a person who is prone to very bad luck] on the part of the security agencies. Uzi Benziman, a very senior journalist here simply suggested on Galei Zahal that…the gag was imposed in order to defend certain unnamed officials who screwed up. The Yediot story is – I haven’t seen it yet – apparently full of blackouts, but these are the last efforts to stem the flood. The headlines on the radio quote Dorner as condemning strongly the gags. This is going to be one juicy scandal here – for the good of our threatened democracy.

From his mouth to God’s ears (an old Yiddish saying).

In an earlier post, I credited brave Israeli bloggers who’ve broken the code of silence about this case.  I neglected Freedom of Search, from whom the above gag order graphic is borrowed.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Anat Kamm: the Story That Dare Not Speak Her Name

Sunday, April 4th, 2010
anat kam

Anat Kam in more carefree days

If you’re an Israeli editor or reporter, you know what thousands of other Israelis know.  That Anat Kam is under house arrest for allegedly leaking up to 1,000 top secret IDF documents to Haaretz reporter Uri Blau, who’s been writing some of the most hard-hitting exposes about army and defense ministry malfeasance over the past year or so.  You also know that Blau is in self-imposed exile in London aware that the police want him for questioning in the case and that Haaretz’s lawyers are negotiating for his return.

You know that there is a prosecution-requested gag order on the fact that she was arrested and the reason for her arrest, which makes her the most widely known “disappeared” person possibly in the world.  You know that Kam faces an espionage charge, and up to 14 years in prison.  You know that her lawyers are also negotiating a plea bargain and that she is hoping for no jail time or a reduced sentence.  You’d also know that Kam and her lawyer have lobbied hard and largely successfully for Hebrew blogs, Hebrew Wikipedia and other online sites to take down material about her arguing it will improve her chances of getting a less severe sentence.

That’s what you’d know.  And also what you can’t breathe a word of to your readers.  So what can you do?  You can write eloquent, oblique columns decrying military censorship, secret detentions, gag orders, the over-cozy relationship between the military, intelligence agencies and the judiciary.  You can even tell your readers there’s a really big story about which you can’t tell them.

It’s all very strange when you read such material.  It reminds you of a blind man feeling his way across the back of a camel and trying to guess what it is, all while you’re seeing it right before your own eyes.  You feel sorry for these poor souls who know many things but can’t convey them to the rest of their countrymen and women.  But after feeling sorry, you begin to feel angry that none of them takes the bull by the horns and does a Peter Finch, yelling “I’m mad as hell and I’m not going to take it anymore,” and then spilling the beans.

While it’s true that Israeli media outlets could face severe sanction for breaking a gag order–their reporters could lose their licenses, government lawyers could tie them up in court for years, they could lose access to government news sources–it seems to me that if Israel is a democracy and if there is a press worthy of the name that someone has to step up and defy the bastards.  So far, no one has (though some brave Israeli journalists like Mya Guarnieri have reported the story for foreign papers).

Not so Israeli bloggers though.  They have stepped up to the plate.  They are reporting this story.  They are naming names.  They are not intimidated.  Blogs like Nimby, Philosophical Outlook, and Human Communication have done what blogs should do when all others around them have lost their nerve or their balls–they told it like it is.  There may be other blogs I’m overlooking and I’d love to hear about them.  I also invite those interested in learning more about this to join the bi-lingual Facebook group, We Want the Truth About Anat Kam, where I’m learning much of this.

Since I began this blog in 2003 I’ve felt a strong need to link my work to Israelis (and Palestinians) including bloggers.  It is important to share important political developments and create a sense of community between us and I’ve tried to do that.  Bloggers unfortunately don’t like being organized or told what to do or what’s important.  So my efforts have been fitful.  Sometimes like at the J Street bloggers panel they work and other times not.

Given the language gap it’s also proven hard to share out respective work.  You can’t easily reprint the best work of Hebrew language blogs unless you can translate it and that takes time and energy.  And vice versa.  All of this meant that bloggers in Israel and bloggers outside Israel were more or less like ships passing in the night.

But this story has changed that.  Now in their hour of need many Israelis see the benefits of foreign media including blogs.  That’s the only way they currently can stay up to date on what their government doesn’t want them to know.  This blog has more visibility inside Israel than perhaps it has ever had before.  What I hope is that this will not change after the Kam story does.  We need each other.

In one of the more ironic developments in a case loaded with irony, it seems that Anat Kam wrote a 2009 story for Walla while she worked there, covering a conference on the use and abuse of military gag orders.  The money quote and most poignantly ironic passage is this one from a senior Israeli police officer participating on the panel who, after reminding the audience of the supposedly welcome fact that the police request only 60 such gag orders per year, says:

Clearly I prefer to conduct investigations in secret, but I’m aware of the limitations on the police in a democratic society.  Sometimes, we seek to prevent publicizing an investigation in order that law-breakers won’t benefit from exposure of the information.

If the results of the Kam case weren’t so troubling, I’d almost call this irony delicious.  As it is, it makes me feel outrage.

How’s this for another irony: Wikipedia, which exists to disseminate knowledge and information irregardless of the whims of government authority decided in the case of Anat Kam to remove its article from Hebrew Wikipedia at Kam’s request.  You’d think the editors would’ve understood that self-censorship by Wikipedia itself is a terribly problematic development.  The article remains down.

I read another Israeli on Facebook pose an interesting argument defending Kam’s act of leaking top secret military documents.  He said that she could argue that though she was breaking the law in doing so, her leak was designed to uncover a far worse crime, that of targeted killings committed by the highest echelons of the military in violation of the law as determined by the Supreme Court.  This argument might work better in a constitutional democracy in which Court rulings are viewed as legal precedent.  In Israel that isn’t so.  But I still think it’s an appealing argument.

Finally, Ran Cohen of Nimby e-mailed me today that there is one benefit, either intended or unintended, for the IDF and intelligence apparatus in this gag order: it focuses attention on the plight of a young women while diverting attention from where it should be–on the rampant, unaccountable, illegal acts of the IDF high command.  It allows us to lose sight of the fact that the Israeli Supreme Court, faced with Haaretz reports that the army’s most senior officers were giving the judiciary the middle finger regarding complying with its 2006 ruling on targeted assassinations–did nothing.  The IDF enjoys virtual impunity in Israeli society and the Court does little or nothing to prevent it.  Uri Blau’s story reveals that for some in Israel the rule of law is little more than an inconvenient theory honored in the breach, if at all.

Anat Kam’s is the tragedy of an individual, while the documents she leaked reveal the tragedy of an entire nation whose democracy has been eviscerated.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Kamm Case: Sorry State of MSM, Critical Role of Blogs in Breaking Controversial Stories

Sunday, April 4th, 2010

In a discussion with Avner Cohen earlier today I learned that Facebook is hugely popular in Israel and that many Israelis are getting their knowledge of the Anat Kam from Facebook because they can’t find it in the Israeli MSM.  I confirmed this via my site stats which show that almost half my visitors are from Israel (normally the percentage is about 3-4%) and many are referred by Facebook.

I found a new Facebook page, We Want the Truth about Anat Kam.  Reading down the group’s Wall I discovered something fascinating.  Avner is right.  Facebook is Israel’s town square.  There are now tens (if not more) of Hebrew language posts about Anat Kam.  And until then, I had no idea.  In a day or so, there will likely be hundreds.  I did know initially about a few bloggers who’d written on this like Aryeh Amihai and Idan Landau, but they all took their posts down at Kam’s request.

In this case, as so many others these days, Israelis are not getting their news from the MSM.  The major papers and media outlets are disgracefully honoring the government’s gag order against publishing details of the story.  Even when the MSM publishes something about the story the report must tip-toe around the facts and essentially ignore them or speak about them in code.  Perhaps in the past some societies had more patience for this.  Nowadays, they don’t.  That’s what’s leaving the MSM in the dust.

Way back in the day when old line media was king, if a story didn’t break there it didn’t exist like the proverbial tree falling in the forest.  But something has changed.  Nowadays, for whatever reason, the MSM often doesn’t break big stories, especially not ones involving a potential cost to them like this one.  As I’ve written here, I first wrote about this on March 15th and could get no one in the MSM interested in it.  Almost two weeks later, JTA and the Independent broke the English-language publishing barrier.  But a blog got there first.

I predict the same thing will happen in Israel.  The Israeli MSM will honor the gag until blogs will embarrass them into publishing.  If they continue to refuse, it will threaten to render them even more irrelevant than they already are.  If virtually every citizen in Israel knows about this case via Facebook and the blogs before the MSM publishes, it will make the latter into a laughingstock.

I don’t want to overstate things.  The MSM still plays a major role in reporting many stories.  It even reports important ones.  The work of Uri Blau, for which he sits in London in self-imposed exile, is a case in point.  But there are times, and they will come more and more often, when the MSM can’t or won’t cover important stories like this one.  When they fail as they have here, it will be more and more clear to the average citizen that blogs play a critical role in social and political discourse.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Reasons for the Kamm Gag, Perhaps Not What You Think

Saturday, April 3rd, 2010

I was just talking to Avner Cohen, who has been my magnetic north in parsing various aspects of this story.  He pointed out a consideration for the gag order which I’d never thought of and it has great validity.

If the Israeli authorities realized that throwing the book at a young Israeli woman for espionage might be problematic for many reasons, and they feared the uproar that the news of her supposed perfidy (“spy,” “traitor,” etc.) would arouse in the right-wing press and among the political ‘hanging judges’ in the Knesset, they might’ve presented the gag to her as a means of removing the case and plea bargaining from the political realm.  They might worry that once this story is widely known in far right nationalist circles, they will no longer have discretion to negotiate a lighter sentence for her.  This may be why Kam and her attorneys have also seen it in their interest to attempt to enforce the gag on Israeli Hebrew language sources.  It may also be why the gag is scheduled to end just before the beginning of her trial, so that there will be almost no overlap between a plea bargain agreement and the trial date.  This would essentially present the public and especially the far right with a fait accompli (and certainly drive them crazy).  We will see in the next few days whether the plea offered by the prosecutor is light or harsh.  If it is relatively light, then we’ll know Avner is right.

hear no evil, speak no evil

A nation of the deaf, dumb and blind thanks to the Israeli authorities (Index Open)

The truth of the matter is (and these are now my views and not to be confused with Avner’s) that in a truly free-wheeling democracy in which there was a political equilibrium between left and right you should be able to put this story out there and let both sides have at it.  In that free for all, a political consensus might emerge and a compromise approach might evolve which would find a way of addressing Kam’s alleged crime and punishment.  But in Israel now, the far right is in such ascendancy that if the case was made public the political hatchet folk might have her locked up forever.  “No punishment is good enough for her.”  That sort of thing.  It is the sad fact of contemporary Israel that Anat Kam may need to be protected from the baying hounds who would love to tear her limb from limb.

An Israeli journalist just sent me links to two new pieces published in Yediot Achronot and Seventh Eye about L’Affaire Kam.  They’re more of the “wink-wink, nudge-nudge” variety which refuse to name names.  But they’re still worth noting.

Israeli human rights lawyer Lila Margalit writes in the most important of the two pieces:

China, Burma, Iran–these are nations expert in the use of secret proceedings in their battle with opponents of the regime…In a democratic country, on the other hand, one of the clearest signs of a free government is that people are not judged in secret.  They don’t disappear into secret prisons.  They are not brought to justice through a process about whose existence the public doesn’t even know.  It is the right of a person in a democratic state to have a public trial.  This is a basic right understood a priori.  This is one of the foundation stones on which is based the rule of law…

The principle of the public nature of proceedings serves as a major red line against government tyranny.  It prevents the abuse of criminal proceedings for political purposes and guarantees transparency in regard to the considerations of the state in bringing an individual to justice.  It enables the public to criticize in the conduct of criminal proceedings and acts as a constructive means of guaranteeing the authenticity of justice.

There are situations in which it is important to preserve secrecy during legal deliberations…But in this matter as in all that concern constraints upon human rights the principle of proportionality is the key…A sweeping black-out that extends over a prolonged period of time is not proportional.  And the longer it lasts the more questions arise about the security considerations of the authorities…

Further, prolonged investigations conducted in absolute secrecy not only isolate the accused from society, but prevent a constructive public deliberation on the substance of the charges.  And in this particular case, even the willingness of the accused to maintain silence doesn’t make the reptile kosher.

The preservation of the all the democratic and legal rights mentioned above protects all of us.  Damaging them doesn’t only trample on the rights of one particular accused, but rather threatens us all.

I agree with Avner’s criticism of the piece as being too vague, basic, and unwilling to deal even with the generalities of the case.  There is an Alice in Wonderland quality to all this, with even a human rights lawyer having to speak in round about fashion about a specific, egregious violation of Israeli democratic values.  Even the greatest eloquence in such circumstances can’t hide the fact that the writer is crippled in an essential way.

The second piece in Seventh Eye lays out the Anat Kam story as if it was the Chad Gadya Passover song.  It’s meant to be humorous and satirical at the same time.  One element of it that made me chafe referred to me:

He who arrived at the report of JTA was connected to a blog which was the first (according to its claim) that exposed the story in the U.S.

“Claimed?”  I realize that journalists who don’t personally know a particular blogger may feel it necessary to protect themselves in the event of error.  But this smacks of condescension and annoys me as a serious blogger.  Is it possible that Israeli journalists find it distressing that an American Jewish blogger could’ve exposed such a major Israeli story?  If so, get over it.  But also keep in mind that I couldn’t have exposed this story without the help of Israeli journalists and other insiders.  It was a two-way street between Israel and Diaspora, between journalist and blogger.  It’s the way good journalism should be practiced, but rarely is in the Israeli context.

I understand a Judith Miller piece may be coming out in The Daily Beast tomorrow.  [UPDATE: The story is here.]  Despite my misgivings about her overall politics, it’s a good sign that she is as disturbed as some of us are about the free speech-free press implications of this incident.  We need allies to bring this story home to a wider public.

Insert Lie Here: April Fool’s IDF Satire from Israel

Saturday, April 3rd, 2010

Just discovered an Israeli blog, NIMBY, devoted to barbed political satire of the kind I love.  Imagine Sadly, No! in Hebrew, but without the shtickThis April Fool’s post is devoted to the IDF’s chief spokesperson, a lad named Avi Bnayahu.  Apparently, on April 1st (!) of last year he left on holiday.  But in his absence he left this pre-printed press release suitable for any eventuality:

“The IDF didn’t use [whatever lie suits].  But rather “due to an operational error [whatever lie suits].”  And further “the Palestinian farmers were armed with [whatever lie suits].”  Bnihu added: “The IDF is the world’s most [whatever lie suits] army.”  Brig. Gen. Bnayahu further expressed regret and clarified that the 9 year-old boy looked much older than his age.

I also loved this short, succinct post, Censorship related to the Anat Kam affair:

There is a gag order on this post.

What makes this especially funny is that most of the posts linked were themselves censored, though by the author and not the authorities.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Anat Kamm-Uri Blau Case Enters Decisive New Phase

Friday, April 2nd, 2010
anat kam israeli journalist

Anat Kam, Israeli journalist negotiating plea deal in leak case (Ido Kenan)

The foreign media continue to open up the Anat Kam-Uri Blau case with new stories in The Guardian, The Times, and The National.  They largely don’t plow new ground, but the Guardian story does carry this strongly supportive statement by Haaretz’s editor, Dov Alfon (a new Twitter follower of mine!):

Uri Blau is in London. He will be there until his editors decide otherwise. We are ready to continue to keep him in London as long as needed. Uri Blau published a lot of articles in Haaretz. All of them are dynamite stuff and it is clear of course that the authorities are not satisfied with these kind of revelations in a major newspaper.”We understand this but we also understand that Israel is still a democracy and therefore we intend to continue to publish whatever public interest demands and our reporters can reveal.”

Haaretz’s lawyers are negotiating with Israeli authorities for his return from self-imposed exile.  The above statement is almost a message of defiance of those authorities telling them that Blau won’t return until his innocence is guaranteed.

I’ve learned from an Israeli source some strange, but not entirely surprising news.  There is a reason why the floodgates of the foreign press are opening to this story but they remain closed in the Hebrew language press.  The Shin Bet doesn’t really care what we write about this story.  What they really worry about is their own citizens, what they’ll learn about it, and what they’ll say about it when they do.  That is why no Israeli newspaper or media outlet has had the balls to break the gag.

I’ve written before here that in the past such foreign media articles would virtually guarantee domestic coverage within Israel.  Not with this story.  Which means we have an intelligence and military apparatus which keeps its citizens in the dark about an urgent matter of national security, Israeli democracy, and the rule of law.  They don’t trust the population to know about the facts and then make up their own minds.  They fear the public.  They fear the force of vox populi.  As Aipac’s Steve Rosen once so memorably said about lobbying groups, they thrive in the dark and die in the light.

Those of us who thought we believed in Israeli democracy, or at least wanted to believe in the concept, should be ashamed.

The National account offers this powerful quotation articulating clearly what’s at stake for Israel:

Orly Halpern, a freelance journalist and Middle East analyst based in Jerusalem, agreed. “I am very worried that Israel would arrest a journalist – or anyone for that matter – and prevent people from knowing about it. These are the actions of an oppressive regime, not a democracy,”Mr Halpern said.
“Israel should have some kind of a protection for whistle-blowers,” another Israeli journalist said. “Even if they go against the state or the system, what [Ms Kam allegedly exposed] was the army breaking the law.”

The journalist, who asked to remain anonymous, said the blackout was one of the most worrisome aspects of the case.

For the reasons I wrote above, Anat Kam has intensely resisted publication of any details of her case even in blogs.  Her side apparently cares much less what we write about her in English language blogs.  Or she may care, but realizes it won’t harm her fate as Hebrew language reporting might.  She’s apparently relying on statements from the prosecution that her silence might allow them to remove counts from her charge sheet or even eliminate jail time altogether.  Frankly, (and I concede I’m neither Israeli nor the victim in this case) I don’t see why any defendant should trust an unwritten statement proffered by Israeli prosecutors.  At any rate, she should know in the next few days what prosecutors will offer her.  If she doesn’t receive the deal she’s looking for and decides to fight, she will have my full support.

The same source also tells me that the State has not asked for her cooperation in the case of Uri Blau.  If this is true, it is welcome news.  I suspected that the reason she felt she might be able to avoid jail time was because of a deal whereby she would testify against him.

I have also received lots of supportive message from fellow bloggers and journalists who understand and appreciate what I’ve tried to do.  I just had a heart-felt message from Mya Guarnieri, who wrote The National story linked above.  George Hale of Maan has also been intrepid.  An Israeli journalist in the belly of the beast who shall go nameless also served an important role in getting word out.  The people who matter know what this blog has done.  As for the others, well…I’ll let you fill in that ellipsis.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

New ‘Moral Politics’ Video on Iran War Game Scenario

Thursday, April 1st, 2010


Watch Israeli War Game Predicts Disaster for Iran Strike in News

Recently, I wrote a post about a Nahum Barnea story which described a war game scenario produced by Begin-Sadat Center researcher, Moshe Vered.  It described an Israeli attack on Iran and the consequences for both nations, the region and the world.  The results were ugly.  A protracted war in which Iran was prepared to sacrifice tens of thousands to avenge Israeli aggression.  Multiple rocket attacks all over Israel turning the country into a virtual national shelter and ghost town.  A united front by Hezbollah, Syria, Iran and Hamas against Israel and aimed at redeeming its pound of flesh.

Vered also suggested that Iran would apply diplomatic pressure on Israel on the international front and demand that the U.S. sanction Israel for its attack.  Israel would face potential isolation, even greater than it already experiences, for its role.

Moral Politics program host Bill Alford asked me to do another show about the war game and U.S. relations with both Iran and Israel.  The result is this video which ranges far afield and discusses the power of the Israel lobby, the lessening deterrent that is the IDF in the face of a determined Arab enemy.

I should also note that Kenneth Pollack of the Saban Center (Haim Saban is one of Aipac’s most powerful donors) also hosted a war game which was described by David Sanger in the N.Y. Times.  I was tempted to write a post about the project and its suspect assumptions, but thought better of it.  This passage toward the end of the article should tell you everything you need to know about how pat the enterprise was and how divorced from actual reality it would be:

The game ends eight days after the initial Israeli strike. But it is clear the United States was leaning toward destroying all Iranian air, ground and sea targets in and around the Strait of Hormuz, and that Iran’s forces were about to suffer a significant defeat.

Imagine that an Aipac-friendly think tank comes up with a script in which the U.S. destroys anything of value to the Iranian military and the latter “suffers a significant defeat” as if wishing made it so.  You hear almost nothing of the price Israel will pay in such an eventuality. There is no contemplation whatsoever of the terrible cost the U.S. would pay both in lives and international credibility if it joined in an Israeli assault on Iran.  No mention at all of the destruction of any–or what little–trust the U.S. might have earned in the Arab world.

I will say though that even if an actual Israel-Iran war is half as bad as Vered portrays or twice as bad as Pollak portrays, Israel is in for some very rough and unanticipated sledding.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

AP Breaks Anat Kamm-Uri Blau Story

Thursday, April 1st, 2010

Today, the media took a few more whacks at the pinata that is the Anat Kam-Uri Blau story and all the goodies are about to drop.  The Independent published its second story on the affair and reported that Haaretz was negotiating with Israeli authorities for Blau’s return from exile.  Interestingly while the first Independent story was written by Donald McIntyre and bylined in Israel, the second was written by a Britain-based reporter.  I’m guessing that this means that McIntyre no longer felt able to resist the gag order that usually affects all Israel-based reporters.  I’m glad to see that this attempt by Israel to suppress the story was resisted by Independent editors in London.

Perhaps the biggest hit came from AP which broke the story with a long piece covering the major details though it didn’t break any new ground.  There is one egregious error which a commenter has noted here today and which makes me steamed:

The U.S.-based Jewish Telegraphic Agency, which is not subject to the gag order, first reported the story earlier this week.

Ah, no.  The U.S.-based blog Tikun Olam first reported the story over two weeks ago and Ron Kampeas in his JTA story even acknowledges the role I played.  You remember Rodney Dangerfield?  “I just don’t get no respect.”   A rhetorical question: why is it that the MSM believes that a story isn’t a story until one of their brethren report it?  And why are blogs considered lower form of journalistic life, even if they are the ones who break a major story like this?  Well, at least we know who broke it, right?

I wrote to AP asking them to correct their attribution.  In which lifetime do you think it’ll happen?

In The Independent story I’ve become “Jewish blogs,” and it makes me feel that I “encompass multitudes:”

The move to gag Israel-based media has sparked fevered debate on Jewish blogs, which have freely reported the story. Bloggers have railed against the blackout, saying it represents a critical challenge to the freedom of the press.

Idan Landau is one of the first Israeli bloggers to write about this.  He jokingly asked his readers to destroy the blog post when they were done reading it.  We had a nice exchange earlier today and I told him I hope I don’t find that tomorrow he’s gone off on holiday to Hong Kong or London (like Uri Blau).  He’s actually in Santa Cruz, CA. and so safe from the eye of the military censor (though his blog is hosted in Israel I believe and if people can disappear in Israel at the hands of the Shin Bet, so can blogs I guess).

There are a lot of good folk who contributed to my knowledge about this affair and did so with fortitude.  The Israelis I think it prudent at this point not to acknowledge individually but they know who they are.  Sol Salbe first made me aware of the story and Avner Cohen not only provided information, he helped me avoid some rather large mistakes.  George Hale at Maan was selfless in sharing his information over the past few days.

There are a number of journalists and editors who I’d like to single out for refusing to play any role when I asked them to, but that would be rather churlish, wouldn’t it?  The next time someone tells you journalism is all about the scoop, tell ‘em they’re wrong.  For some reason, some scoops are too hot to handle.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
Performance Optimization WordPress Plugins by W3 EDGE