Mahzor

New York Public Library

Churches

Sarajevo Haggadah

Mah Nishtanah

Sarajevo haggadah

Antaea Darom

Israeli women's art

Action

Torah as music

Ben Heine

Action

ceramic bowl

Mohammad Said Kalash, "Offering Reconciliation" exhibit (photo: Ilan Amihai)

Action

Punch and Judy/Pinchas and Jamila

Avi Katz

Action

David Grossman

Ben Heine

Action

Eldrige Street shul

Lower East Side

Action

Dove

Ben Heine

Action

Two birds

Hoda Jamal

Action

Israeli and Palestinian boys

from documentary, Promises

Action

Cat in the Hat

Yiddish version

Action

Daylight through the Wall

Banksy: graffiti art on Separation Wall

Action

Maurice Sendak's Brundibar set

New Victory Theater (photo: Nan Melville/NYT)

Action

Daniel Barenboim, West-Eastern Divan Orchestra

Palestinian-Israeli musical ensemble (photo: Kerstin Joensson/AP)

Action

Great Day on Eldrige Street

N.Y.'s klezmer greats celebrate shul rededication (photo: Leo Sorel)

Action

Joint Appeal for Peace

(Avi Katz)

Joint Appeal for Peace

Ketubah, Ancona, Italy (1772)

(Jewish Theological Seminary library)

Ancona ketubah

Archive for April, 2010

Next Israel Military Order: Earth to Cease Rotating Around Sun

Thursday, April 8th, 2010

Can we next expect an IDF expulsion order for Galileo?

Israel’s odd concept of the gag order has received great prominence–and derision– in the case of Anat Kam.  Via a Facebook group established to protest her case, a member has devised a hilarious new Israeli order: apparently the top military brass find it inconvenient that the earth revolves around the sun.  To stop this malarkey, they’ve issued a military order that it cease and desist from doing so.  Judge Einat Ron has even signed the order.  Henceforward (Galileo was wrong!), the sun will revolve around the earth.  Until, that is, the order is removed, of course at the convenience of the IDF.

To protect the ass of the brilliant general who conceived of this, a gag order has also been imposed to prevent reporting it inside Israel.  Oops, I guess we broke the gag again!

My sources tell me the next step in this plan is to expel Galileo from Israel as a thorn in the side of the most moral and geo-physically advanced army in the world.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Kam-Blau Case: Shin Bet Pimping for IDF General?

Thursday, April 8th, 2010

Was Gen. Yair Naveh in need of career proteksia?

Throughout the coverage I’ve written and read about the Anat Kam affair, I’ve heard a number of sources say they understood that the entire investigation was much bigger than just Anat Kam; that it involved, and was designed to protect, someone important.  I never heard anything more specific than that, but the notion was very provocative.

One of the first Israelis to blog about this case just wrote me tonight with some fascinating ideas about it.  Some of this is a little inside Israeli baseball, so I hope you’ll forgive me in advance for that.  My source spent some time thinking about the investigation’s original code name, “Double-Take” (Akifa K’fula in Hebrew):

[Israeli] police officers enjoy word-play [involving] initials of suspects.  Aqifah K‘fulah can be a poor play on the initials of Anat Kam (using the Kaf instead of the Quf, but note that akifah begins with her initials, pointing to the fact that someone [in the police] was looking for this connection).

One final issue is the term aqifah.  Undermining the authority of your superiors in the army is usually referred to as aqifat samchut (especially in reference to someone who goes to someone higher[[ranked] than their immediate supervisor). Which in a way, is what Kam did – taking her concerns to the press instead of her immediate officer, Gen. Yair Naveh. You have coined this story as the Kam-Blau affair, and I saw that Tal Yaron started referring to it as the Kam-Naveh affair. The name of the operation might point that the security authorities were also more concerned with Naveh’s fate and future rather than Blau’s.

Even if my source is wrong in his last speculation, which I think he may not be, I think he’s gotten to the underlying importance of this entire episode.  Anat Kam’s fate, while important to her and her family, is secondary.  While Uri Blau’s fate is more important, it isn’t even the most important issue.  The real issue that we mustn’t lose sight of is that Anat Kam’s boss, General Naveh, the IDF commander for the West Bank, approved targeted killings of Palestinians in contravention of a Supreme Court ruling.  Not only that, but he then lied about the nature of the killings in order to cover-up his original act.

If this were the army of any other democratic country, he’d be ripe for court martial.  Further, his memos show that even the chief of staff, Gen. Gaby Ashkenazi was in the loop.  In other words, Israel’s highest general was complicit in a grave breech of Israel’s rule of law.

We must turn the battleship that this case has become on a dime and get the world, as much as we can, to focus on the evil done by the powerful in this case and the ways in which they’ve tried to cover their tracks.

Someone might argue with this theory and say that if the IDF truly wanted to let the matter die, it would’ve dropped any proceeding against Kam or Blau and hoped the entire thing faded from public consciousness.  However, we know that Kam provided Blau with more documents than the two published in his original report.  Given that Kam worked for Naveh, we can only presume that she provided other damaging documents with his fingerprints, and initials, all over them.  If so, then gagging Kam and pursuing Blau might’ve seemed a reasonable strategy for Naveh and those protecting him.  That strategy has now blown up in their faces given that the gag order has become a laughingstock and will be removed in a few hours.

But the underlying questions are: will they throw the book at Anat Kam and turn her into another Jonathan Pollard?  How do we get Uri Blau home safe and sound and unprosecuted?  And how do we get the Israeli Supreme Court to do its job and hold the top brass accountable for the rotten behavior?

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Shin Bet to Announce End of Kam Gag Order

Wednesday, April 7th, 2010

Noam Sheizaf reports that finally, humbled by the disdain of the entire Israeli nation, the Shin Bet will announce tomorrow morning the end of the gag order on the Anat Kam-Uri Blau case.  This is a feeble attempt at damage control, as every major Israeli media outlet has heaped scorn and derision on the police, courts and intelligence services for their attempt to prevent the nation from knowing formally what almost every Israeli knows informally: that Anat Kam leaked top secret IDF memos which revealed senior commanders flagrantly disregarded a Supreme Court directive limiting targeted killing of Palestinians.  In fact, the top brass not only thumbed their nose at the Court, they lied about the assassination and claimed the victims resisted (meaning they got what they had coming to them), which they did not.

Everything about this case reeks to high heaven, except the good citizens who leaked the document (Kam) and her journalist-collaborator, Uri Blau, who published the expose in Haaretz in 2008.  It reeks even more because the Court has done nothing to force the issue and the IDF remains accountable to virtually no one on this and most other security issues.

We must keep the Israeli public’s eye on the fact that the wrongdoers here are neither Kam nor Blau, who remains in exile in London because the IDF and Shin Bet want a piece of him as well.  The wrongdoers are the ones with medals and epaulets.  To the extent that the police continue pursuing the whistleblowers, we will continue to make them pay a price for that by pointing out that such a pursuit is inimical to the values of a free, democratic society, which Israel likes to claim it is.

If and when Uri Blau returns to Israel he should be feted by any Israeli, even ones opposed to his views, as someone who embraced values of skepticism in the face of government power.  I doubt it will happen, but it should.

The next major milestone is the Kam trial scheduled to start on April 14th if she doesn’t work out a plea bargain with the prosecution first.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

IDF Military Censor: Kam Gag Gives Censorship a Bad Name

Wednesday, April 7th, 2010

Channel 10 TV: 'Gag order secured at the behest of Shin Bet chief'

Israeli media are beginning to place blame for the farce of the Anat Kam gag order squarely at the feet of Shin Bet chief Yuval Diskin.  You know how bad things have become for him when even the chief Israeli military censor parts company in order to maintain its good name.  Didi Remez features this report from Danny Spektor in Yediot Achronot in which the IDF officer responsible for military censorship distances herself from the gag order by saying any attempt to imply that her office had any involvement in the matter constitutes “incitement” against her office, which conducts itself according to the highest standards of an Israeli government agency.  That word “incitement” is strong stuff reserved for a situation when an Israeli really feels their ox has been gored politically.

This gag order is beginning to remind me of the poor Spanish bull so bloodied and full of knives inflicted by the various toreadors and matadors that you wonder how it can still stand up.  Will someone finally put the gag out of its misery?

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Judge Who Approved Kam Gag Order Perverted Justice in 2003 Palestinian IDF Shooting

Wednesday, April 7th, 2010
khalil al mughrabi 11 year old palestinian killed by idf

Khalil al Mughrabi, 11 year old Palestian died in part for Einat Ron's sins

judge einat ron

Judge Einat Ron lied about 11 year old Palestinian's death, approved Kam gag order

Judge Einat Ron, the Petah Tikva magistrate who granted the gag order in the Anat Kam case has a sordid history going back to an infamous 2003 case in which she counseled the IDF how to lie to the Israeli NGO, B’Tselem, to avoid a wrongful death investigation.  At that point, she was Colonel Ron of the IDF military prosecutor’s office and weighed in on the case in that capacity.

I thank Diane Mason of Lawrence of Cyberia for bringing this incident to my attention.  Here is Chris McGreal’s Guardian report from 2003 (the killing occurred in 2001):

11-year-old Khalil al-Mughrabi was shot dead in Rafah by the Israeli army two years ago as he played football with a group of friends near the security fence. One of Israel’s most respected human rights organisations, B’Tselem, wrote to the judge advocate general’s office, responsible for prosecuting soldiers, demanding an inquiry. Months later, the office wrote back saying that Khalil was shot by soldiers who acted with “restraint and control” to disperse a riot in the area. However, the judge advocate general’s office made the mistake of attaching a copy of its own, supposedly secret, investigation which came to a quite different conclusion – that the riot had been much earlier in the day and the soldiers who shot the child should not have opened fire. The report says a “serious deviation from obligatory norms of behaviour” took place. In the report, the chief military prosecutor, Colonel Einat Ron, then spelled out alternative false scenarios that should be offered to B’Tselem. B’Tselem said the internal report confirmed that the army has a policy of covering up its crimes. “The message that the judge advocate general’s office transmits to soldiers is clear: soldiers who violate the ‘Open Fire Regulations’, even if their breach results in death, will not be investigated and will not be prosecuted.”

Diane also quotes from other sections of the B’Tselem report:

The documents presented in this report raise grave questions about the manner in which the army investigates itself. An eleven-year-old child was killed and two children were injured for no reason. However, the army failed to open any investigation against the soldiers responsible, even though all the army officials involved in the review of the incident clearly knew that the soldiers had used lethal weapons when their lives were not in jeopardy and had violated army regulations.

The army conducted a shallow and superficial inquiry, at all stages of the process, and made no effort to understand how the children were injured, to determine who was responsible, and to ensure that such incidents would not recur. All levels of the army hierarchy failed. The soldiers who violated the Open-Fire Regulations shot to death a child and injured two other children; the IDF Spokesperson provided an imprecise version of the incident (the Southern Command Judge Advocate even noted this in his opinion); the Southern Command Judge Advocate submitted an opinion that offered a version different from that stated in the operations de-briefings.

The Chief Military Prosecutor, Col. Einat Ron, went even further. In her legal opinion, she proposed an obviously false version of events as a reasonable course of action. The fact that she did not hesitate to propose, in writing, possible courses of action that clash with the truth raises a serious concern that lying is considered legitimate practice in the office of the Judge Advocate General.

Which raises the obvious question: how does a chief military prosecutor guilty of promoting a false account of a lethal IDF firing incident get a promotion to become a civilian judge?  But one question we don’t have to ask: why would the Israeli police shop its gag order application to Judge Ron?  The answer is obvious even before asking the question.  Here is an officer of the court so attuned to the needs of the prosecution that as a prosecutor she was fully prepared to lie on its behalf.  Of course the Israeli police would want such a judge to hear their case.  And the gag order was a slam dunk.

The next time any of my pro-Israel readers wish to argue that Israeli justice operates at a very high standard and protects the rights of individuals to free speech and human rights, let them first explain this holy mess of a case, and specifically Einat Ron, and how she got to be where she sits today as an honored member of the nation’s legal justice system.

In the U.S., such an individual would either have been disbarred for the counsel she offered or would at least have been brought up on charges.  In Israel, she’s offered a promotion.

And doesn’t the illegal killing of Khalil al-Mughrabi bring us right back to the original crime for which Anat Kam leaked IDF documents and which Uri Blau published in Haaretz?  They too were exposing the IDF’s illegal targeted killings of Palestinian militants in violation of an Supreme Court ruling.  It seems that just as Einat Ron was covering up the IDF’s mess in 2003, she continues to cover up in 2010.  It’s nice work if you can get it.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Anat Kamm: Grey Lady Awakens from Her Slumbers…Finally

Tuesday, April 6th, 2010

The N.Y. Times has finally awakened from its deep slumber on the Anat Kam story.  It only took them 22 days from when I published my first post! What’s most strange about this article is that it has no byline.  Through this case, and similar behavior from other media outlets, I’ve learned that a newspaper omits a byline when identifying a reporter would endanger or seriously complicate his professional life.  The Guardian’s Israeli correpondent Rory McCarthy wrote the Guaridan story on Anat Kam but there was no byline.  All of which means that either Ethan Bronner or Isabel Kershner wrote this byline-less story.

Frankly, I think this late in the game to omit a byline is chicken-shit.  Donald McIntyre of The Independent published a story using his byline.  Mya Guarnieri published in The National using her byline (she by the way is an Israeli citizen and even more endangered than the NY Times’ Israel-based reporters).

With this article, I’m happy to report I’ve hit the blogger equivalent of Nirvana: a link in the Times along with my blog’s name and my own name.  For this, ironically, I have Judy Miller to thank since this information in the Times report was copied from Judy Miller’s Daily Beast story.  Today, was the biggest day of traffic for my blog in its history, over 6,000 unique visitors, over three times normal.

Anat Kamm Gag Order Published for First Time

Tuesday, April 6th, 2010
anat kam gag order

Original Anat Kam gag order dated Jan. 1, 2010

I just received the Anat Kam gag order from a confidential source for whom I have great appreciation considering that s/he risked a great deal to offer this to me.  But before I reveal it to you I wanted to convey a hilarious comment Zvi Solow just wrote:

I realise that no one will believe this, but the truth is that we are not getting closer to Iran. We’re getting very close to Chelm tho’.

I wish I believed him.  I don’t think Israel’s intelligence apparatus is as out of control as Iran’s, but to argue that this is democracy or anything remotely close is also laughable.  Israel is somewhere between Chelm and Iran.

Let’s Wizard of Oz-like, open the curtains on the characters without whom this farce  could  not have existed.  For the judiciary, we have the plump, august Judge Einat Ron of the Petah Tikvah court.  For the Israeli police, we have Sa’ar Shapira to thank.

I’ve written about Judge Ron and her professional background in the military justice system, which explains why she was a pushover.  Other Israelis will have to tell us more about Shapira so that we can thank this person for their Chelm-like efforts to make Israel a laughingstock among the democratic nations.

The gag application notes that the code name of the investigation is “Double-Take.”  Which is interesting and may unintentionally reveal that two people are its targets: Anat Kam and Uri Blau.  The document is dated January 1, 2010 and says the order is extended for an additional 90 days (which would’ve taken it to April 1st).  The document reveals that a previous gag order, which I don’t believe anyone has publicly report until now.  It was secured on October 8, 2009.

Further, here are the justifications mounted for the gag order (and keep in mind that this investigation was seeking to identity and punish Anat Kam and possibly Uri Blau for exposing the fact that the IDF killed Palestinians in contravention of a decision from Israel’s highest court):

Publication of any sort about this investigation or any detail concerning it is likely to damage state security, to damage and frustrate the gathering of evidence, and the ability to prove criminal acts.

I can understand why an Israeli general might want to argue that exposure of his illegal acts would be damaging to state security.  But I can’t understand why any court worthy of the name would allow such a travesty.

This passage from the gag order document is also chilling.  It seeks among other things:

…To prohibit publication about the investigation or that it even exists, and on the judicial discussion of the matter and legal decision rendered by the court which have been and will be conducted…

We seek that the gag prohibits publication even about this application for a gag order, its content, and even the existence of a gag order in this case; and any other publication likely to identify the respondent, witnesses, suspects or others engaged in the investigation, including publications of their images, addresses, or other identifying details.

This is the rhetorical banality of state security apparatuses the world over.  I’d expect verbiage of this sort from the Burmese junta or perhaps Kim Jong Il’s North Korea.  But Israel?

The applications for the order is approved by Judge Einat Ron in her own hand.  I will have more on this woman of perspicacious judicial temperament in my next post.  This is starting to remind me of a serial soap opera with the major difference being that the “actors” in this case, the generals and their judicial enablers have brutally taken the lives of others or covered up the taking.

Stay tuned…

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Where in the World is Anat Kamm?

Tuesday, April 6th, 2010

Where are you, Anat Kam? (photo: Itamar Broderson h/t Didi Remez)

Performance Optimization WordPress Plugins by W3 EDGE