Mahzor

New York Public Library

Churches

Sarajevo Haggadah

Mah Nishtanah

Sarajevo haggadah

Antaea Darom

Israeli women's art

Action

Torah as music

Ben Heine

Action

ceramic bowl

Mohammad Said Kalash, "Offering Reconciliation" exhibit (photo: Ilan Amihai)

Action

Punch and Judy/Pinchas and Jamila

Avi Katz

Action

David Grossman

Ben Heine

Action

Eldrige Street shul

Lower East Side

Action

Dove

Ben Heine

Action

Two birds

Hoda Jamal

Action

Israeli and Palestinian boys

from documentary, Promises

Action

Cat in the Hat

Yiddish version

Action

Daylight through the Wall

Banksy: graffiti art on Separation Wall

Action

Maurice Sendak's Brundibar set

New Victory Theater (photo: Nan Melville/NYT)

Action

Daniel Barenboim, West-Eastern Divan Orchestra

Palestinian-Israeli musical ensemble (photo: Kerstin Joensson/AP)

Action

Great Day on Eldrige Street

N.Y.'s klezmer greats celebrate shul rededication (photo: Leo Sorel)

Action

Joint Appeal for Peace

(Avi Katz)

Joint Appeal for Peace

Ketubah, Ancona, Italy (1772)

(Jewish Theological Seminary library)

Ancona ketubah

Archive for April, 2010

Grave IDF Security Lapse Enabled Kamm Document Theft

Sunday, April 11th, 2010
yair naveh

Gen. Yair Naveh, helped bring about Kamm security lapse (Institute for Land Warfare Studies)

Zvi Solow has told me that the Kamm-Blau case reminds him of the famous imaginary shtetl, Chelm.  It was a place where everyone thought he was wise and no one was.  Each person had to outdo the other in proclaiming their brilliance, and the smarter they proclaimed themselves the funnier they became.  I’m not fully convinced.  There isn’t enough humor in this case for it to merit Chelm.  But there is sheer, breathtaking incompetence.

And stupidity, there’s plenty of that.  Apparently, Anat Kamm’s accumulation of IDF documents was enabled by the absolute dunderheadness of her commanding general, Yair Naveh.  A technological Neanderthal, Naveh didn’t like reading his top secret memoranda on computer screens.  So, while there was proper handling of this data which was sent to a computer in the general’s office, which prevented copying of any documents from it, Kamm had to forward the documents to another less secure computer in order to copy them for the general.  While doing so, she realized she could also copy them for herself as well.  That’s how this mess all started.

Let’s leave aside all the other issues of this case: whether Kamm’s motives were pure, venal or treasonous.  Did the IDF follow even basic security procedures in allowing this to happen?  How is it possible that one of the senior commanders in the entire army got caught with his pants down in this fashion? This, after all, is supposed to be one of the most technologically advanced armies in the world.  Yet Naveh liked the old-fashioned feel of paper in his hands as he read his top-secret memos.  I’ve got news for him: it’s one thing to like reading the print version of your favorite newspapers or to prefer the crisp pages of Proust turning in your hands–but does a general have the same luxury when it comes to reading critical documents?

Given how the Israeli system is gamed to prop up the strong and relentlessly pursue the weak, not a word has been spoken about Naveh’s unpardonable lapse.  No word on any reprimand for him or those in his office who knew of this appalling lapse and allowed it to continue.  No citizens screaming at the systemic failure of IDF counter-intelligence procedures to avert this disaster.  But millions of words from the IDF, Shin Bet and media about the young girl who allegedly endangered the republic by practically marching over to Khaled Meshal and giving him the store (at least that’s what the Israel far right would have you believe).

This case is full of the most rank hypocrisy.  We have journalists clamoring for Kamm’s head who themselves have reported on top-secret documents leaked to them by IDF officers or Shin Bet/Mossad agents.  We have politicians raging that her citizenship should be rescinded who themselves have leaked classified material to preferred journalists.  None of them was punished.  In fact, the journalists probably won promotions.  The politicians still sit in the Knesset or various ministries.  But Anat Kamm is a traitor because she did what everyone one of them has done.

You certainly can argue that Kamm leaked documents that were critical parts of the army’s war fighting doctrine and that this was far more severe than other types of leaks.  To which I respond that every leaker has a different motivation and everyone thinks their motivation excuses the leak itself.  And I’m perfectly prepared to defend this leak as one that benefited, rather than harmed the nation.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Just Who is a Terrorist?

Sunday, April 11th, 2010
anat kamm by mish

Anat Kamm: Beware the bloodied hand that points the finger (Mish)

Many can agree that Palestinian militants who bear arms and engage in violence against Israeli targets are terrorists.  Some can find some reason to justify targeted killings against such figures.  And a few may even justify such despite Israeli Supreme Court rulings which specifically rule out killings by the IDF.  Those who justify such actions do so under the rubric of the war on terror and say pretty much anything Israel does to “defend” itself is OK.

But what about Israel?  What about actions of its own forces and agents against not only Palestinians, but Israelis themselves?  Haggai Matar brings up a small incident from the narrative that Uri Blau published in Haaretz about his experience as a wanted journalist in exile.  Blau notes that he received a call from a friend while he was on a 3-month backpacking trip with his girlfriend in Thailand.  He warned Blau that his apartment had been broken into and ransacked.  After the reporter called the Israel police, the policeman investigating told him: “They must’ve been looking for something.”

Or maybe they weren’t.  Blau had already adhered to his part of a written agreement with the Shin Bet to destroy his computer.  Perhaps they thought they might find something else.  Who knows.  But Haggai Matar, a long time conscientious objector and Israeli peace activist, points to another motive–sheer terror:

It was about 8 years ago. I was active for the Shimnistim Letter (a statement of refusal by conscientious draft objectors), and I was one of those tasked with coordinating the signatories’ name lists.  One day, my parents’ home was broken into, and my computer was taken. Nothing else. Computers belonging to other family members, money, valuables were all spared. In the same month, break-ins took place in the homes of prominent activists in Courage to Refuse and Yesh Gvul, two other conscientious objection organisations. The houses were all turned upside down, and in all of them the only items missing were computers with CO name lists.

I remember being appalled – not really comprehending back then how Israeli “security forces” operated – and as the years went by, I learned to smile back at my naivete. But reading Blau’s account today got me wondering. Why, come to think of it, do they need to break into our homes? After all, there are legal routes to obtain search warrants and confiscate computers, in a perfectly orderly manner…So why burgle?

The answer is that breaking-in signifies the deeper truth about the nature of their work.  Like the…Mossad that murders people in faraway countries without ever admitting it – the innermost essence of the Shin Bet is embedded into such break-ins.  It…is a statement: “We are the law, and we are above the law, and under the radar of the law, as we please”; and also, “you know it’s us, and there’s nothing you can do about it”; and at the end of the day, “we are everywhere in your life, all the time, and don’t you forget it.” It’s breaking-in with intent to terrorise…

Uri Blau is in exile in Britain, his email and his phone are tapped, and he is threatened with interrogation and arrest if he dares to return to Israel. He is also awaited by his upturned flat, a silent testimony to the terror hovering over all of us.

This is not to mention the far worse treatment handed out to Palestinians in similar situations who run afoul of the IDF or intelligence services.

So the next time you talk about “terrorists” remember that there are terrorists among us, our fellow countrymen and women, whose job is to terrorize us and take away our rights, our property and our sense of personal security.  This is yet another part of the Kamm-Blau case that will hardly be addressed within Israel.

Daniel  Ellsberg’s prosecution was terminated because of precisely the same violations of his rights.  In Israel, such protections are not afforded to defendants.  Unlike the sanctions the court imposed on the FBI for its misdeeds, no Israeli court would dare step in and free Anat Kamm or Uri Blau (if he ever returns to Israel) on the basis of such a break-in.  And that is why blogs like this must exist.  To keep the forces of darkness in Israeli society in check.  To look over their shoulder and tell Israelis and those in the Diaspora what it’s like to live in a national security state that sacrifices individual rights for an alleged claim of security.

H/t to Noam Shiezaf for graphic.

Israeli Far-Right, Media, Shin Bet Baying for Kamm’s Blood

Saturday, April 10th, 2010

Here in the U.S. we too have our Teabaggers with their foul hate spewing against African-Americans, gays and even our president.  We’ve also seen our share of political violence including presidential assassinations.  But still little prepares you for the frenzied, teeth-baring rage to which Anat Kamm is being exposed in the Israeli media and pages of Facebook.  I’m displaying some of the relevant graphics here.  I don’t know whether to complain to Facebook about the existence of groups calling for the execution of a fellow human being or to leave the pages up as Exhibit A in the venom spewed by these vulgar hooligans.

Here are some of the relevant passages:

Maariv main headline: “Grave Espionage”

Execute Anat Kamm: We must eradicate leftism from our nation”

Anti-Zionists have advanced all the way to here [prison]: that she should never see the light of day, the disgusting piece of garbage”

I too want Anat Kamm executed: what do you say?  Electric chair or hanging?”

“Declare Haaretz a terror organization”

I call upon all Israelis, Diaspora Jews and lovers of democracy everywhere to stand against this odious venom.  I would like to see a group of legal scholars and jurists organize to rebut the heinous charges and persecution being meted out to both Kamm and Uri Blau.  I too am hoping that bloggers and journalists may create an organized campaign inside and especially outside Israel against this McCarthyite vigilantism.  Just as Israel was embarrassed into removing the gag order we must try to make Israel embarrassed that the hounds are baying for the blood of a fellow Israeli merely for the fact that she released documents that reveal the immorality and even illegality of IDF actions in the Territories.

This is the face of Israeli rightism exemplified by Lieberman and those farther to his right.  But there is no question that the IDF and Shin Bet themselves are contributing to the lynch mob mentality by releasing deeply misleading, histrionic claims about the damage Kamm did to Israeli security.

Now, they are claiming that Uri Blau sought to publish an article exposing IDF battle plans the week before Operation Cast Lead.  They bray about this as if Blau was whispering the words into ear of Hamas’ military wing.  In fact, Haaretz’s Amos Harel later reported that these very same battle plans were tantamount to war crimes in the blatnat disregard with which they treated Palestinian civilian life.  The Israeli shreying for Uri Blau’s head have a fatal inability to understand what Israel is supposed to be: not a State of cold blooded killers virtually executing old men, women and children as happened all too often in Gaza in 2008 and Lebanon in 2006.  Is that language too sharp for you?  Well, what else do you call free fire zones in which IDF soldiers are told to kill ANYTHING that moves as happened during Cast Lead?  This is testimony straight from soldiers given such orders.  I didn’t make it up.

And if those battle plans called for Israel invading and occupying Gaza and expelling Hamas as I believe likely–is that not information which any well-informed citizen should wish to be informed of?  And if the battle plans called for mass expulsion of Gazans as I understand it did from an informed source: is this not information the public has a right to know in order to determine whether Cast Lead was justly conceived and executed?

The rightist hooligans, newspapers and Shin Bet spokespeople crying treason and other horrid epithets should also recall that Haaretz presented this Blau article to the military censor who initially approved it, whereupon Haaretz printed the edition.  When the IDF asked Haaretz to remove the edition from circulation it did so.  So how was Israel’s security compromised??  The article never saw the light of day.  Blau never gave away “state secrets.”  Haaretz acceded to the wishes of the army.

I remind my readers that what Kamm and Blau did is almost precisely what Daniel Ellsberg and the NY Times did in the Pentagon Papers case.  Ellsberg revealed Pentagon position papers and strategic doctrine regarding the Vietnam War.  The president, defense and intelligence establishment had a holy fit.  And guess what happened?  The Papers were published as far as I know without censorship.  Ellsberg wasn’t charged with treason and didn’t serve a day in jail.  The Republic didn’t fall.  North Vietnam didn’t win the war as a result of anything it read in the pages of the Times.  In fact, many of us believe the Ellsberg case was one of America’s shining hours as a democracy.  Is it wrong to demand anything less of Israel?

An Israeli source sent me an e-mail with some acute observations about the most recent developments in this case:

First, he notes that just before the gag order was rescinded, Ehud Barak announced that he had refused to extend Gaby Ashkenazi’s term as chief of staff.  There may be many reasons for this, but one very suggestive one might be an attempt to remove the current chief of staff from the mix involving this case.  If there is ever a full trial involving this case, Ashkenazi is up to his eyeballs in it and approved the illegal assassinations highlighted in one of Blau’s reports.  There may even be further revelations in some of the as yet unpublished documents that further sully the chief of staff’s reputation.

My source notes that it wasn’t just the IDF that performed these illegal targeted killings.  They were prepared along with Shin Bet teams as well.  Which means that the Shin Bet is also implicated in this wrongdoing.  If the Supreme Court ever develops the balls to haul these jokers in to ask them where they get the effrontery to disobey a Court ruling it will be the Shin Bet as well as IDF which will have to answer.  That might explain the desperation of the intelligence services to hang onto the gag order far after it outlived its usefulness.

He ends his message with this passage which I found touching and empowering:

I hope that if these issues can be raised in the foreign media through you and others, there will be a chance that they can penetrate the Israeli media as well.

He flatters me and my influence.  But some people have listened to what I have to say here.  With the help of my readers in Israel and the Diaspora, people will continue finding the material I publish here important for understanding this critical case for Israeli democracy.  Tell your friends about this blog.  If we’re going to change minds and have an impact we need the largest audience we can muster.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Anat Kamm’s Alleged National Security Threat

Friday, April 9th, 2010

When the Shin Bet removed the gag order against Anat Kamm recently and released a new indictment, it accused her of harming the security of the State of Israel by stealing documents whose contents would be much sought after by Israel’s enemies.  At first, knowing that the basis of her indictment was for documents Uri Blau published in Haaretz which proved that IDF top generals knowingly ignored a Supreme Court ruling which limited targeted killings, I disparaged the Shin Bet’s claim.  But the IDF is now putting out word that Kamm also stole sensitive military planning data and strategic documents which, for example, laid out the orders of battle for what would become Operation Cast Lead.

I read that, in fact, Uri Blau prepared an article for Haaretz before the war in which he laid out those orders and battle and explained why they were deeply problematic because they marked a radical departure from usual IDF procedures which attempted to protect enemy civilians during war.  The reporter presented the article to the censor, who refused to approve it.  This in turn would’ve alerted the IDF that their data had been compromised,  The rightist Jerusalem Post is claiming that the IDF changed its tactics because it knew of the “mole.”  This type and tone of reporting might do Kamm in in the court of Israeli public opinion by turning her from a whistleblower into a traitor.

But we need to look at this potentially damaging issue entirely differently.  Let’s go back to the leak of the Cast Lead orders of battle.  After the war, Haaretz did publish an article very similar to the one Blau might’ve published before the war (though it was written by Amos Harel)  and it revealed a deeply disturbing perversion of standard IDF procedures.  It showed that Gaza became a virtual free fire zone and that anything that moved in many sectors was destroyed, no questions asked. Many believe the changes in IDF strategic and tactical doctrine during the Gaza war amounted to war crimes.  This is one of the primary contentions of the Goldstone commission.

Imagine that there was no military censor and Blau HAD published his article before the war.  Imagine there could have been a wide public debate about the IDF’s new doctrine.  Imagine that public criticism could’ve moderated such plans and lessened the death toll among Gazan civilians, 1,100 of whom were killed in the 2008 war.  Viewed this way, Blau’s and Kamm’s acts are not espionage or treason or damaging to the State.  On the contrary, they contribute vastly to the public good by revealing potential violations of international law before they happen, thus allowing Israel to turn away from danger.

On a related matter, Kamm did not leak these documents to “the enemy” as the government seeks to claim.  She leaked them to an Israeli reporter and they didn’t damage Israel’s security because they weren’t published.  So in effect, if you accept military censorship which I don’t, the system worked and the censor prevented a supposedly damaging document from being leaked in such a way that it might have betrayed Israeli tactics during a war.

Note: I’ve changed my spelling of Anat Kamm (from “Kam” as I originally spelled it) due to the fact that her e-mail address displays her name that way, which  indicates that this is how she prefers it in English.

Mysterious Anat Kamm Photo

Friday, April 9th, 2010
anat kamm

Jim Hollander of European Pressphoto Agency has asked that I remove this photo so unfortunately you must visit here to see it http://arabnews.com/middleeast/article41035.ece/REPRESENTATIONS/large_620x350/mid_anakamm.jpg

Gahli Lit, one of my new Israeli friends from the Anat Kamm case, has sent me a truly mysterious photo of Kamm which cries out for an explanation. It pictures Kamm standing in what the caption calls a “Tel Aviv courthouse” on December 29th after a court hearing.

A few truly strange facts about the timing of this photo. On December 29th, Kamm was either in prison or under house arrest. There was a gag order preventing publication of her identity, the reason for her arrest, or even the existence of a gag order altogether. The judge who approved the gag order was Einat Ron. If you examine the nameplate on the wall next to Kamm you’ll see that she’s standing outside Einat Ron’s courtroom (which is actually located in Petah Tikva).

What gives? This woman on that date was radioactive plutonium as far as the Israeli media is concerned. Yet a photographer working for European Pressphoto just happened to be standing by her and snapped this picture? It makes you wonder how the Israeli justice system conducts justice that’s supposed to be conducted in secret. It makes you wonder how the Shin Bet allows such a gagged citizen to be photographed during a hearing on a deeply sensitive case.

Dimi Reider just e mailed me to say that December 29th was the last date on which Kamm’s gag order was renewed.  And that would be the purpose of the hearing.

One thing is for sure: the Israeli media have written that they’ve known about this case for a long time.  This photo would indicate that either the photographer or the editor who sent him on assignment (or both) knew about the case.  This only further illustrates the collusion between the press and the intelligence agencies.  The press knows about the gag order, knows it can’t do anything with the picture, but takes it anyway for insurance if and when it can use it.  What a country!

My Israeli friend Zvi Solow tells me that the Kamm-Blau case strikes him as much more Chelm than Le Carre. I still don’t know which is more apt.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Shin Bet Chief: Our ‘Enemies Dream of Getting Their Hands On’ Documents Kam Leaked, and Other Lies

Thursday, April 8th, 2010
yuval diskin

Yuval Diskin, Shin Bet chief

You gotta hand it to Yuval Diskin.  All of Israel has grown weary of the Shin Bet’s three-ring gag order circus.  The Supreme Court was even writing notes asking what was the be gained by this laughingstock.  And yet Diskin bounces right back like a Jack in the Box (pdf) ready for more obfuscation, mendacity and outrageousness.  Here is a sampling:

“It is a dream of every enemy state to get its hands on these kinds of documents,” said Shin Bet security service chief Yuval Diskin. “And we would be  happy to receive these kinds of documents from the enemy.”

What kind of bulls(&t is this guy peddling?  Does he really believe that the Palestinian families whose loved ones were murdered in cold blood by the IDF on the orders of the high command will gain some benefit from learning about the truth about how their loved ones were killed?  That this knowledge will somehow help them in their jihad against Israel.  If not, what specific benefit is he claiming these documents will provide “the enemy?”  What is this guy smokin’?

Not to mention that every single report Uri Blau wrote for Haaretz using these documents was approved by the military censor.  So if the censor didn’t find any damage to the State in the reports, is the Shin Bet interposing itself as a better arbiter of what will harm it?  If so, why not depose the IDF censor and replace her with one approved by the Shin Bet?

The persecution of Uri Blau undermines a fundamental aspect of the social contract between a journalist and State organs in this sense:

…In Israel…we have military censorship that inspects every security-related report ahead of publication.  This censorship frustrates journalists, but also protects them. An American journalist can publish anything and risk indictment for breaching state security, while an Israeli journalist whose report is approved by the censor has fulfilled his legal duty and is exempt from any liability. The censor, not the journalist, is in charge of preserving security.

This case shatters that tacit agreement and further weakens the status of journalist in Israeli society.  Now, not only does he have to pass military censorship, but doing so gives him absolutely no sense of protection.  In effect, this creates yet another suffocating layer of government oversight that stifles the public’s right to know and the journalist’s right to provide it.

Oh, and just in case you mistakenly believed that the gag order collapsed of its own weight and the 1,000 paper cuts wielded against it by Israeli bloggers and  foreign press and blogs like this one, here’s Herr Diskin to enlighten you:

According to Diskin, after Moser [Haaretz's lawyer] rejected a proposal offered to Blau by the Shin Bet and the state prosecutors, the agency decided to partially lift the gag order which had prevented Israeli media entities from reporting details of the story. In addition, Diskin said the Shin Bet will change its policy in terms of its handling of the affair and will apply more stringent measures in its investigative tactics in the imminent future.

Everyone and their brother knows the REAL reason this transparent attempt at secrecy and intimidation died, yet Diskin wants to piss on our backs and tell us its rain.  Further, you have a known liar telling Israel that he promises the Shin Bet will do better in future; that it won’t embarrass the judiciary and even his fellow IDF military censor who was aghast at this gag order, by going on such wild goose chases in the future.

If I really believed him I’d cheer and open a bottle of champagne thinking that my blog had really promoted good government and a positive reform in Israel’s democracy.  If only I could believe him.  I would really like to.  But I know that this, like so many words coming out of his mouth, is a lie.  The Shin Bet will do whatever it feels is in its interests regardless of previous statements or agreements.  So this, like the agreement the Shin Bet signed with Haaretz and violated almost immediately thereafter, isn’t worth a plug nickel (or shekel).

Here’s another lesson that Diskin has learned (pdf) ass-backward about this affair.  Did the media serve any useful role?  Of course not, just the opposite. We’re those lily-livered Commie pinkos who lurk behind every tree just waiting to hinder the work of servants of the people like him:

Shin Bet security service head Yuval Diskin yesterday openly threatened, in the most scandalous way, that his organization will “remove its gloves” in dealing with this affair. “We were too sensitive to the media world … that’s the lesson we’ve learned from the affair,” he said.

Another reporter writing in today’s Haaretz reminds us that just after the 1967 war, Yeshia Leibowitz, perhaps Israel’s greatest public intellectual of the 20th century, prophesied that Israel’s Occupation would eventually turn it into a “Shin Bet state.”  Leibowitz truly had the power of prophecy.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

We Won…or Did We?

Thursday, April 8th, 2010

Many have written congratulating me on victory we won against the Shin Bet in lifting the gag order against Anat Kamm and Uri Blau.  My haver, Jerry Haber, even wrote a blog post, Thank You, Richard, which was immensely flattering.  I appreciate the sentiment, I really do.  It’s great to feel you’ve made a contribution to help right a wrong.

But unfortunately, we only won one battle and a rather small one.  There is still a war to be fought as I outlined in my last post.  Anat Kam faces life in prison.  Uri Blau in self-exile faces a fate potentially just as bad.  IDF generals who broke the law will likely never receive any punishment.  The Israeli Supreme Court, made a laughingstock by IDF impunity, either hasn’t the power or gumption to call the military brass to heel.  The Shin Bet continues to run roughshod over the civil liberties of Israelis, especially Palestinian citizens.

Israeli democracy is under siege. The rule of law doesn’t rule.  The generals run amok.  There is an internal battle to determine whether citizens run the State or vice versa.  There is much work that remains.

Though I’ve written this before, it can’t be said enough.  I did this with the help of MANY: Israeli journalists, bloggers, human rights activists; and here in the States with the help of Israeli-American activists and American Jewish bloggers and journalists.  I would list them all but I’m afraid the list would make its way to the Shin Bet and cause problems for some of them.  So please don’t take the omission of your name as an indication that I don’t know and appreciate what you’ve done.  May we continue this partnership in the future and use it to make the unaccountable accountable for their actions.  We will be here for the next Anat Kam, and the next…Make no mistake, there will be more Anat Kams till Israel ends the Occupation and rights the grievous wrong that it symbolizes.

Please consider making a donation to support the ground-breaking investigative work of this blog.  For example, the TV news program Russia Today, wants a web interview with me for their Anat Kam story, which means I have to go out and buy a webcam.  Support the work, we’re on the side of the angels.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Israel Breaks Kam Gag: Floodgates Open

Thursday, April 8th, 2010

For three weeks, an assiduous group of Israeli and American Jewish bloggers and human rights activists have been chipping away at the solid rock wall of secrecy surrounding the Anat Kam-Uri Blau case.  Today, with the help of some craven Shin Bet officials who’ve been embarrassed by the tumult we created, the wall has collapsed and the floodgates of information and recrimination have been opened.

There is a great deal to report here on multiple fronts involving multiple characters in this drama, so please bear with me.

First, the authorities released a new indictment which outlines the alleged criminal acts of Kam and Blau in this case.  Before we review it, let’s keep in mind that the incident in question would never in most other democratic nations amount to a case of criminal espionage since the leaker was a whistleblower seeking to reveal serious crimes of her superior officers and because the material was leaked to a professional journalist who published in one of the nation’s leading publications.

Here is Dimi Reider’s summary of some of the salient passages:

1. The charges are grave in the extreme. Although the documents were delivered by an Israeli soldier to an Israeli journalist, Kamm is charged with grave espionage (“divulging secret information with the intent to harm the security of the state”)

2. Kamm had first offered the documents to Yedioth Ahronoth’s Yossi Yehoshua, but “the delivery did not take place.”  Yehoshua is slated to appear as a witness for the prosecution.

3.  There’s a “third man” – note that she used someone else to copy the documents…

4.  The investigation is led by the International Crimes Investigation Unit. It may have to do with the charge – espionage – or may hint she had tried to pass the documents [to journalists] abroad.

Some other important facts: previously we knew Kam faced a sentence of 15 years for the charges.  But the new indictment reveals a more grave charge for which the penalty is life in prison. We previously knew Kam took as many as 1,000 documents from the office of Gen. Yair Naveh.  The indictment claims she took 2,000 documents (keep in mind that the claims made are just that and that Israeli authorities have been known to exaggerate or distort the truth in such cases).

yuval diskin

Yuval Diskin, Shin Bet chief: would you buy a used national security indictment from this man? (Life)

She is accused of committing grave damage against the State through her leaks:

The accused did so out of ideological motivations and with the intent to damage the security of the state, among other means, through publishing the documents to the general public.

Note the unwillingness of the State to consider that Kam’s actions were based on MORALITY.  Using the term “ideology” allows them to smear her and her motivations.  But make no mistake, this was a lesser crime committed to expose a greater one.  And the greater crime posed far more danger to the State and Israeli democracy than Kam’s actions.

What also goes unmentioned is that the “damage” she actually did was to reveal grave violations of Israeli law by the highest echelons of the IDF.  The only damage she did was to their reputations.  Of course, it is inherent in the mind of generals and tyrants that damage to their own selves is the same as damaging the nation.  But citizens may have a more sanguine view of this.

Further, the only use made of the documents was for those published in Haaretz.  Every article Uri Blau wrote using these documents was approved by the very same Israeli military censor whose job it is to ensure that no article is published which injures Israeli security.  So how can Yuval Diskin argue that Kam or Blau damaged the security of the state??  It’s an absolutely ludicrous and baseless charge.

Finally on this subject, keep in mind that the Shin Bet has a history of wildly exaggerating charges against various accused in national security cases.  See Jerry Haber’s post on this subject.  DO NOT TRUST anything they say about this case unless it is verified by a disinterested, informed and credible source.  The Shin Bet is none of these things.

While I am torn as to how to characterize Kam’s motives, it is reasonable to hear Dimi Reider’s interpretation of them, which are highly charitable (and hopefully justifiably so–I’ve expressed some doubts on this subject myself):

To my mind, Kamm appears to be an earnestly patriotic woman who had faith in her country and trusted its authorities to follow the rules. In her military service, that very basic sense of decency was affronted by the fact the authorities couldn’t care less about the rules, and vigorously engaged gross violations of Israeli and international law; this is  especially true about her superior, Brig Gen Yair Naveh. She decided to act on it, and did the most democratic thing she could have done: She yanked at the alarm bell. People coming from sincere faith to a rude awakening often become the most damning accusers.

The indictment, due to sloppy excision, actually reveals Kam’s home address.  This is a grave breach of privacy and I’d imagine that a court in any other democratic country would look upon this government malfeasance very unfavorably.  Such an act actually opens the defendant to personal and physical attack by the many Israeli rightists who believe she is a traitor to her country.  In other countries, I might believe such sloppiness was accidental.  But with the Shin Bet such errors are hardly ever accidents.  They want Kam exposed to the wrath of Israel.  They want to punish her and make an example of her.  Not just to throw her in prison, but to punish her psychologically and emotionally.  This is way the security services play the game there.

Jerry Haber’s comparison of Anat Kam (and Uri Blau) to a few other historic whistleblowers is apt:

Anat Kamm. Daniel Ellsberg. Donald Woods. What do they have in common?

I frankly am astonished that any Israeli reporter would testify for the prosecution against a whistleblower who had offered secret documents to him.  What does this say about the value this reporter and Yediot Achronot attaches to such sources?  Why would any source trust anyone from Yediot in future?  Have the editors thought through the implications of his testimony for the prosecution.  I say, if he does testify then Yediot is little more than a government mouthpiece and its journalistic credentials are deeply tarnished.  How can they hold their head up to their readers and the rest of Israel?  It is one thing to be a loyal subject of the realm and quite another to become an extension of the security apparatus.  Shame on Yossi Yehoshua.  Shame on Yediot.

Now to Uri Blau.  The Shin Bet alleges it made an agreement with him to return the documents he received from Kam and destroy his computer.  It claims that he broke the agreement by taking documents with him and fleeing the country.  What doesn’t wash with this explanation, and it’s the same one the Shin Bet tried to use in incriminating another citizen it effectively exiled, Azmi Bishara, how does a wanted journalist flee the country with top secret documents and the Shin Bet doesn’t know about it?  Simply put, no citizen facing his level of scrutiny leaves the country unless the Shin Bet permits it.  They allowed him to leave.  If they didn’t know what he was carrying on his person they’re either lying or incompetent.  I doubt the latter.

Here is Haaretz’s version of the same events.  I’ll let you decide which side appears more credible:

“On September 15, 2009, these discussions [between Blau and the Shin Bet] led to an agreement under which Uri Blau transferred to the Shin Bet dozens of documents that were in his possession, and in exchange the Shin Bet committed to refrain from investigating the reporter regarding his journalistic sources, refrain from investigating the reporter as a suspect, and refrain from using the documents as evidence in legal proceedings against the person responsible for leaking the information.

“Once all the conditions were agreed upon and the documents were transferred, the Shin Bet requested Uri Blau’s personal computer. Haaretz agreed, and the computer was destroyed.

“A short time later, the Shin Bet arrested Anat Kam, a former soldier in the IDF Central Command, on suspicion that she was Uri Blau’s source. In January 2010, the Shin Bet informed Blau’s lawyer, Mibi Mozer, that his client was wanted for investigation. Mozer said that the demand contradicted the conditions of the agreement and that he would advise Blau not to comply.

“From that point on, the Shin Bet refused to fulfill the conditions of the agreement it had signed. The Shin Bet also rejected Mozar’s proposal to draft another agreement that would highlight the Shin Bet’s goal of protecting Israel’s security, while still preserving the conditions of the former agreement.

I understand that it’s not the purpose of intelligence services in any country to be pure and lily-white, by any standard this narrative shows the Shin Bet to be a despicable rogue force accountable to no one and bound by nothing, not even written legal agreements.  And even in any subsequent legal proceeding, the security agency will face no sanction for breaking this agreement.  I hope that Haaretz will eventually release the agreement to further embarrass the Shin Bet.  I feel sad for Israel to have its domestic security secured by such utter scoundrels.

While an Israeli source told me that Galey Tzahal reported that the State said they would not prosecute Uri Blau, Haaretz reports that he will remain in exile.  This would indicate that the Galey Tzahal report has to be in error.  No reporter remains in exile unless he is serious jeopardy.

Here Uri Blau finally has an opportunity to speak his piece about the affair.

Let us all be very clear in this and subsequent reporting of this story that the accused are the heroes of Israeli democracy and the accusers are actually the criminals.  We must make them pay the price.  It may be a vain undertaking.  But if there is justice in the world, we must try to see it is done and not perverted.  Israel is “a world turned upside down,” to use the title of Leon Rosselson’s wonderful revolutionary song.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
Performance Optimization WordPress Plugins by W3 EDGE