Mahzor

New York Public Library

Churches

Sarajevo Haggadah

Mah Nishtanah

Sarajevo haggadah

Antaea Darom

Israeli women's art

Action

Torah as music

Ben Heine

Action

ceramic bowl

Mohammad Said Kalash, "Offering Reconciliation" exhibit (photo: Ilan Amihai)

Action

Punch and Judy/Pinchas and Jamila

Avi Katz

Action

David Grossman

Ben Heine

Action

Eldrige Street shul

Lower East Side

Action

Dove

Ben Heine

Action

Two birds

Hoda Jamal

Action

Israeli and Palestinian boys

from documentary, Promises

Action

Cat in the Hat

Yiddish version

Action

Daylight through the Wall

Banksy: graffiti art on Separation Wall

Action

Maurice Sendak's Brundibar set

New Victory Theater (photo: Nan Melville/NYT)

Action

Daniel Barenboim, West-Eastern Divan Orchestra

Palestinian-Israeli musical ensemble (photo: Kerstin Joensson/AP)

Action

Great Day on Eldrige Street

N.Y.'s klezmer greats celebrate shul rededication (photo: Leo Sorel)

Action

Joint Appeal for Peace

(Avi Katz)

Joint Appeal for Peace

Ketubah, Ancona, Italy (1772)

(Jewish Theological Seminary library)

Ancona ketubah

Archive for March, 2010

Enlisting Krav Maga in the War for Israel

Monday, March 22nd, 2010

Doesn't krav maga make you want to stand as one with Israel in its war against the Palestinians? (Jack Guez /AFP-Getty)

As the reader who sent me this story wrote: “You couldn’t make this stuff up.”  The story is from the Chicago Jewish federation newspaper:

Kimberly Mor and Sue Garstki, the owners of Krav Maga Illinois, in Highland Park, are giving new meaning to the phrase “get home safe.”

Their school is the first of its kind on the North Shore licensed to teach Krav Maga—the official self-defense system of the Israeli Defense Forces (IDF)—through the official Krav Maga Worldwide training center and the Ministry of Education in Israel.

In case any of you wondered whether Israel and the IDF have become a replacement for the Jewish religion in the minds of Diaspora Jews, you have this passage to assure you that like the Torah (and the Pope), krav maga is infallible:

“No matter where you go in the world (the Torah) is exactly the same. If there is a mistake in the Torah, then that isn’t considered a Kosher Torah. That’s one of the other things that really pulled me toward Krav Maga was that I knew that it was really from the source, it was the absolute truth when it came to self defense.”

For those of you who see those pictures of IDF soldiers beating Palestinian demonstrators and feel a surge of Jewish pride, then krav maga (literally “contact fighting”) is just for you:

They say many of their students come to Krav Maga not only for self-defense, but also to feel a connection to their family in Israel…

Everybody feels a connection to the soldiers, whether they are Jewish or not,” Mor said. “Soldiers and their fighting spirit, we really teach fighting spirit here.”

“…I’m not coming from Israel and I’m not Jewish, yet I believe that the army is so strong and so prepared that I’m willing to practice this every day of my life. I love it…”

And we love it too.  Someone has to report this use of hasbara to Israel’s Hasbara minister.  He’ll undoubtedly want to disseminate news of this brilliant new use of pro-Israel propaganda world-wide, just as he’s touting the co-optation of the European rabbinate on behalf of expounding the joys of Israel to a doubting European public.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Jerusalem: Capital in Name Only

Sunday, March 21st, 2010

Jerusalem, one and undivided--East Jerusalem protester at Shuafat refugee camp (AP/Sebastian Scheiner)

Akiva Eldar has a good column in today’s Haaretz, written on the eve of Bibi Netanyahu’s visit to the U.S., where he will address the triumphalists at the Aiapc national policy conference.  If you want to get a flavor of how far to the right the speakers will be, take a look at this conference schedule.  Conversely, I’m delighted that NPR broadcast a segment this morning that acted as a strong counter-balance to the upcoming conference, in which Michelle Kelemen interviewed both Jeremy Ben Ami and Steve Clemons.  Glad to hear that Aipac is no longer the only show in town even as its big day approaches.

Returning to the conference, we pretty much know what Bibi will say, we’ve heard the script before.  But what’s especially useful in Eldar’s column is the truth behind the lies and deception you’ll hear from Israel’s PM.

First, Israel is the only country in the world whose capital is recognized by NO other country.  Israel claims that Jerusalem is “undivided” when in truth it has been divided since 1948.  Even “reunification” in 1967 changed nothing except allowing Jews to shop in the Old City shuk and enabling them to begin expropriating Arab property in the Jewish Quarter and other places in East Jerusalem.  In almost every other way, especially with regard to city services, Jerusalem is two entirely separate and alien cities.  For entertainment value, Eldar brings this eye-opening quotation:

On March 21, 1999, the first Netanyahu government announced that it would “strengthen Jerusalem as an undivided city through equality in services and infrastructure between the western and eastern parts of the city.”

The Israeli government likes to point out that it is the only authority that can be trusted to ensure freedom of access for all religions to holy places.  Eldar points out that there is NO free access to Muslim holy places for Muslims.  No non-Jerusalem Muslims can visit the city’s holy places and only women and the elderly who are Jerusalem residents can do so.

Eldar also notes that Bibi claimed that building in Jerusalem (he should’ve said East Jerusalem to be specific since most major construction is now in Arab neighborhoods) is the same as building in Tel Aviv.  The columnist correctly points out that the prime minister should’ve also clarified that building for Israel’s JEWISH citizens in Jerusalem is no different than building for them in Tel Aviv, since there is NO legal construction for Israel’s Palestinian citizens in Tel Aviv, Jerusalem or anywhere else.  And a further clarification about building in Tel Aviv and Jerusalem, there actually IS a difference between the two–Israel builds in current Arab neighborhoods in Jerusalem and confiscates Arab land to do so.

Yesterday brought news that Mauritania, one of the only three remaining Arab countries which recognize Israel did an about face and severed ties.  And then there were two.

So when you hear the cheering starting tomorrow from Aipac’s true believers, just remember the issues they’re too delirious even to address concerning the contradictions between Israel’s professed values and the way life is lived on the ground.

Happy Passover: Settlers, Immigrants, and the Perversion of Jewish Values

Saturday, March 20th, 2010

“You shall not oppress the stranger [immigrant] because you know the soul of the stranger for you yourselves were immigrants in the land of Egypt” (Exodus 23:9)  [translation, R.S.]

This verse recalls the migration of Jacob’s sons to Egypt during an ancient Israelite famine.  It invokes the history of oppression that Jews suffered there as economic migrants who ultimately escaped slavery at the hands of Pharaoh during the miraculous exodus orchestrated by Moses during the holiday we are about the celebrate, Passover.

Ruth and Naomi (Leonard Baskin)

The Bible calls on Jews to treat immigrants (the term ger in Hebrew, which is often translated as “stranger”) with respect no less than eight different times in at least four different books.  In addition, there is the deeply moving story of the Book of Ruth, whose entire plot revolves around an Israelite economic migrant, Naomi, who travels with her family to Moab to escape famine at home (not unlike current Israeli immigrants from Sudan, Ethiopia and Asia).  While in Moab, Naomi’s sons marry Moabite women, but when the sons and her husband die, she decides to return to Israel and urges Ruth, her daughter-in-law, to return to her Moabite family.  Ruth refuses with one of the most gracious, moving speeches to grace the entire Tanach:

“Entreat me not to leave you, or to turn back from following you; For wherever you go, I will go; And wherever you lodge, I will lodge; Your people shall be my people, and your God, my God. Where you die, I will die, and there will I be buried. The LORD do so to me, and more also, if anything but death parts you and me.” (Ruth 1:16-17)

In more recent history, we have the accounts of righteous Gentiles who gave Jews refuge during the Holocaust at great risk to themselves and their families.  Conversely, we have a darker history of those like the Roosevelt administration which turned Jews away from ports of refuge, as the St. Louis was shunned when it unsuccessfully attempted to deposit 900 Jewish refugees in the New World

This is not a general subject that is peripheral, but rather is at the heart of Judaism.  Without the tender mercy of strangers, we might have long ago ceased to exist as a people.  Therefore, we see ourselves as a generous people, one attuned to suffering and therefore bound to treat the stranger in our midst with kindness and respect.

So how else should a Jew react when they read disgusting incitement (for the full effect in the original Hebrew, read here) from none other than a member of the Israeli Knesset, Yaakov “Ketzeleh” Katz, who is also a prominent extremist settler leader.  Here Katz (whose nickname oddly invokes the Yiddish diminutive for “kitty-cat”) inveighs against the thousands of economic migrants pouring into Israel’s economy from dire African places like Sudan, Ethiopia and Somalia.  One linguistic note: the term “infiltrator” used here has a charged connotation in modern Hebrew, as it historically referred to Palestinian fighters who “infiltrated” Israel to engage in terror attacks:

The State of Israel is facing a hard problem: Between 1,000 and 2,000 persons infiltrate each month through the porous southern border…In an increasing arithmetic progression we will reach, in six or seven years, 75,000 or 100,000 African infiltrators, most of whom will live in Tel Aviv…

With a century of hard labor, Am Yisrael has built here a Jewish state. In ten years, these infiltrators could make it all go to waste. We are losing the state to insanity.

…Our committee has visited schools and kindergartens in Arad and we couldn’t believe our eyes: The city is slowly being taken over. The schools in Arad and Eilat are filling up with Eritrean and Sudanese children. Already, close to a tenth of the city’s inhabitants are Sudanese or Eritrean, Muslims and Christians.

We got used to thinking that we are defeating our enemies in battles and here they have surprised us from the rear. The rulers of Sudan and Eritrea, in collusion with the Egyptians are conquering Israel.

Note in this passage, echoes of the Nativist rants of yesteryear against the oncoming hordes and unwashed masses bearing hard down on our shores.  Note the language akin to that used to describe a plague of locusts or other form of vermin.  The racism is mind-boggling.  Also note that Katz, comfortably ensconced in his West Bank settlement home, is attempting to gin up hysterical fear among the wealthy denizens of Tel Aviv’s northern suburbs, which are akin to places like Evanston, Scarsdale, Beverly Hills and Napa Valley in the U.S.

…The infiltrators are penetrating Hatikva neighborhood, are flooding south Tel Aviv and every day they advance a few tens of meters towards Dizengoff on their way to Akirov and Ramat Aviv…As I see it, there is no choice but for the prime minister to declare martial law for everything regarding infiltrators.

In the following passage, Katz suggests establishing an entire city for migrants that would be a cross between a concentration camp and Hooverville:

…I have suggested…to start [constructing] a city that will be a decent distance from the border, where only there the infiltrators will be allowed to live. They will be employed in government projects for building the city itself [and] building the border fence [to prevent further immigration].

It may be that this kind of labor would take it’s toll on the infiltrators in a way that they will advise their relatives not to follow in their footsteps to Israel. They may even wish to pay again $2,500 per head to the corrupt guides who brought them here, this time in order to  return them to their home.

For some time no one is surprised how many of Tel Aviv’s residents are willing to sell Judea, Samaria and Jerusalem. But it is unbelievable for me to behold how it does not bother them that their own city is becoming Eritrean and Sudanese. A thought sneaks to my mind that this secular, liberal and elitist community has simply lost all will to live…Is this what they hoped for when they built their homes in Tel Aviv? That it will become an African city? What kind of person wants to sell himself and his home?  [translation: Eitan Issacson]

The Jewish people both within and outside Israel should know that when they continue supporting the Occupation, they are supporting racism like this.  Do we want to be judged and measured as a people by the hate of such hooligans?  Further, I challenge the settlers who define Judaism and Jewish values for us as they do here in the comment threads.  Theirs is not Judaism.  It is a perversion of Judaism.  Let’s call it Judea-ism, an idolatry based on worship of land over the spiritual values which our Biblical Prophets represented.  We do not need a Third Temple in order to be good Jews.  We do not need armed outposts in Hebron to maintain our covenant with God.  Let us take back our religion from such people.  They do not represent us, nor should they represent Israel.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Swiss Public Radio Interview on American Jews and Israel, Aipac, and the Lobby

Friday, March 19th, 2010

Max Akermann, U.S. correspondent for Swiss public radio, interviewed me for a report he was preparing on the state of the American Jewish relationship with Israel in the run-up to the Aipac national policy conference.  The segment talks also talks about J Street and other progressive developments in the American Jewish community.  If you understand German, I recommend you give the four minute segment a listen (audiostream requires RealPlayer).  I’m delighted to share the stage in this piece with Henry Siegman.

I hope I’m not sounding like a broken record when I point out that European media are far more interested in what progressive American Jews have to say about the Israeli-Arab conflict than American media, including Jewish media.  I’ve been interviewed by Dutch, Swiss and Turkish reporters.  Not once by a major American newspaper or NPR.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Anat Kamm, Self-Censorship and the Israeli Left

Friday, March 19th, 2010

This blog was the first English-language source which reported that Israeli journalist Anat Kam was secretly arrested by the Israeli police for allegedly leaking top secret IDF memos describing the army’s flagrant disregard for an Israeli Supreme Court ruling.  The latter provided limitations on the IDF’s use of targeted assassinations against Palestinian militants and the memos documented the army’s violation of the judicial decision.  I reported that not only was Kam’s arrest secret, but the reason for her arrest too was embargoed by the Shin Bet.

After I read every Hebrew source about this affair and wrote my own post, a number of these sources disappeared.  It turns out that Anat Kam herself and others on the Israeli left have urged those who have published to remove their material.  Indymedia Israel did this (see cached version).  Kam asked the Hebrew Wikipedia to remove the article about her and it did.  As a member wrote quite sensibly (in Hebrew) in response:

If Shimon Peres told you to remove his Wikipedia article, would you?

For a few days I also did so after an Israeli peace activist told me that Kam was negotiating with the Shin Bet and hoped if little was made of this affair that she might get off with no jail time.  I took my post down.  Then I wrote to Avigdor Feldman asking him to confirm that he wished me to do so.  I never received a reply.  I republished my post.

Aside from the Shin Bet’s egregious behavior, several developments in this case have troubled me.  First, I discovered that Anat Kam had published a tart dismissal of the Israeli conscientious objector movement.  I wondered how someone who allegedly leaked top secret documents discrediting the Israeli army’s policy on a item of major national security significance could also disparage the very peace movement which these memos would assist.

I also noticed that at a Hebrew language website which had archived all online sources dealing with this case, someone sounding very much like Kam, but using the pseudonym “Noa,” railed against the website owner for maintaining the archive.  I should add that I have other confirming evidence that the commenter was Kam.  Among other disparaging statements she made about him:

You know Anat Kam?  You tried to make contact with her?  Or did you take on yourself the decision to be the Prince of Human Rights and Democracy and to claim you know what would be best for her?

…And further, I haven’t even begun to count to the number of times you were an accomplice to violations of the gag order (linking to articles which commit such a violation makes you into a criminal accomplice.  It’s a good idea to examine the law from time to time.)”

On reading this, Aryeh Amihay, owner of the website took the entire archive post down.  He too was intimidated by the veiled threat in the comment.  So someone will have to explain to me how this sort of behavior serves anyone’s interests, even Kam’s.  I fully understand that she is only 23 years old, faces very serious charges, and is under enormous pressure from the security establishment.  I understand how this can turn one from being a principled person attempting to do good into someone seeking to save their own hide.  In fact, I had experience with another whistleblower who, after being caught, acted in almost precisely the same way.  This appears to be part of human nature, the instinct for self-preservation.  So I am trying not to be judgmental on that score.  But this seems to go far beyond what is required under the circumstances.

So I’d recommend that those on the Israeli left who’ve cooperated with the wall of silence reconsider their decisions.  I continue to believe that silence doesn’t serve the greater good of Israeli democracy.  I don’t even believe it serves Anat Kam’s interests, but as she herself says, that’s for her to determine.

I don’t know what motivated Anat Kam allegedly to leak the IDF memos.  I would hope her actions were based on a citizen’s disgust with the army’s brazen disregard for the rule of law.  But it occurs to me, and I freely concede and even hope I am wrong, that the leak may’ve been motivated by an aspiring journalist who found herself in a position to advance her career by making such material public through Israel’s leading daily newspaper, Haaretz, and a respected investigative journalist, Uri Blau.  I also note that following her army service she went to work for Walla, an internet portal owned by Haaretz.  Coincidence?

There are aspects of this case which still have not come to light.  Anat Kam is not the alpha and the omega of this story.  More than this, I can’t say at this time.  I look forward to being able to say more at a later date.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Israel’s Concession to Obama on Settlements: Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell

Thursday, March 18th, 2010

In a rather strange and striking parallel, the Washington Post’s Jackson Diehl, writing on behalf of the Netanyahu government, has inadvertently likened settlement building to the “love that dare not speak its name” (homosexuality). Both apparently bring shame in certain quarters.

Diehl reports that Bibi Netanyahu, cognizant of his missteps with the Obama administration over the past week or so, has thrown a few sops to the angry Americans. Among them is this one which would make me laugh my head off if it wasn’t so friggin’ sad:

Coupled to that would be an Israeli pledge to avoid publicizing further construction decisions in Jerusalem. The result would not be a freeze, but something like a “don’t ask, don’t tell” policy for settlements.

As in “what you don’t know won’t hurt you?” But the problem is that Obama will know because there are Israeli NGOs like Peace Now and Ir Amin that record every planning approval and housing start for new settlements. This is a piece of garbage that should insult Obama. What do the Israelis take Obama for?  Do they think American opposition to settlements is something cosmetic that can be papered over with such narischkeit??  Even Diehl has the good sense to write:

It’s not clear whether Obama will accept such a fudge

“Fudge” indeed. I can think of other more colorful words for it. But the fact that a Jewish fundamentalist government (remember homosexuality is banned in the Bible) is likening settlements to being gay without even realizing it is doing so tickles me. If I was gay I’d be angry beyond belief to have my sexual orientation yoked to such a nasty habit (settlement building, that is).

The other sad thing about this charade is that Bibi actually has the gall to call this proposal a “confidence building measure.”  He really believes attempting to build settlements in secret will improve U.S.-Israel relations.  One of my readers, Shirin, likes to call such Israeli attitudes narcissistic in the extreme.  I agree with her.  Israeli leaders only think about how they can manipulate American presidents into getting what they want.  Don’t ask, don’t tell in a settlement context is pure manipulation.

Shin Bet Secretly Detains Reporter for Leaking Top-Secret IDF Memos

Thursday, March 18th, 2010

Shin bet logo

NOTE: On March 14th, I was the first blogger or journalist to report this story outside Israel.  Subsequently, an Israeli peace activist informed me that Anat Kamm’s attorney and friends have asked others not to publicize her case.  In honor of that, I decided to take down this post as I did not wish to harm her defense.  I wrote to Kam’s attorney, Avigdor Feldman, and asked him to confirm that he did not wish any public discussion of her case.  He has not replied.  For that reason, I have decided to repost this story with some amplifications and editing to reflect new information I’ve learned.

*   *   *

We’re going to be getting into deep territory tonight regarding Israeli military intelligence, the Shin Bet, and their ability to make a mockery of alleged Israeli democracy and freedom of the press.

Anat Kam: 'Disappeared' Israeli journalist (Ido Kenan)

An Israeli friend brought me word that Anat Kamm, an entertainment writer for the popular Israeli internet portal, Walla, was secretly arrested and imprisoned, after which she was placed under house arrest by Israeli authorities.  Needless to say, this is a highly unusual development.  In fact, I can’t remember the last time this happened to an Israel journalist.  I apologize that most of the material I’ll be linking to is still in Hebrew and not yet translated.  If that situation changes I’ll be adding English language links or sources.

Though Kam denies this, Israeli sources maintain she has been fingered by the Shin Bet as the source of a highly damaging 2008 Haaretz report that noted that a number of Palestinian militants who, the IDF claimed in separate media reports, were killed during firefights were actually assassinated in cold blood.  This of course wouldn’t be news since it has happened many times before.  What was news was that in 2006 the Supreme Court laid down specific and limited procedures under which targeted assassinations may be pursued.  Haaretz revealed that the IDF was ignoring the Supreme Court’s ruling and essentially killing militants in cold-blood and covering up the fact.  It approved killings even if civilians were also likely to be killed.  It approved killing suspects who were not “ticking-bombs,” another contravention of the Supreme Court.  In fact, as recently as 2009 the IDF killed Palestinians under suspicious circumstances which Palestinians have labelled murder in cold blood, leading one to believe that targeted assassinations continue.

 

The Haaretz report, which presumably and inexplicably passed military censorship, displayed two IDF top-secret documents drawn up by the military senior command, which laid out the provisions for the killings and proved that they were ignoring the Supreme Court ruling.

A former intelligence agent, Jonathan Dahoah Halevi, working as a researcher for Dore Gold’s Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs, examined the documents in detail attempting to trace the source.  While he didn’t specifically identify Kam, he did make clear that he believed the “Deep Throat” served in a position in military intelligence which allowed access to such documents.

Dahoah Halevi fed the story to ShalomLife, a Canadian Israeli news portal which published this rather sloppy right-wing slant on the Kam case. Dahoah Halevi was the editor of Shalom Toronto, listed as a sponsor of ShalomLife. The publisher of ShalomLife, Yossi Arbel, is also the publisher of Shalom Toronto. Some speculate that it may be an attempt by the Jerusalem Center to smoke out an Israeli journalist who will break the gag order by reporting on a story previously reported outside Israel.

On a rather humorous personal note, the author of the ShalomLife article confuses this blog with an “internet forum belonging to the Israeli left” by misattributing a quotation from this post to such an entity:

Internet forums belonging to the Israeli left have expressed support for the leak by Anat Kam, and have called it “a moral act” and “a civil duty”. One of the messages stated: “We must fight for Israeli democracy even if Anat Kam cannot or will not do it herself, and even if the Israeli press cannot or does not want to do it itself.”

There is one especially salient, disturbing passage in the ShalomLife story, which speculates on Kam’s motives in leaking the documents:

It is safe to say that the leaker wished to advance a political agenda and arouse wider public criticism in Israel and the world towards the IDF’s focused and deliberate policies against agents of terror.

First, it is convenient for an Israeli rightist to focus on Kamm’s alleged political agenda and neglect that she undoubtedly had a moral and democratic agenda as well.  Second, since the author of the Jerusalem Affairs analysis was himself a former intelligence officer and because Gold is a Likud loyalist, we can safely assume that this reflects the Shin Bet’s own views in the matter.  Which is all the more reason to fight this detention tooth and nail.  The far-right can natter all they wish about opposition to its policies being political, but the truth is that opposing targeted assassination and leaking material that documents violations of the law is a MORAL act and a the democratic duty of a citizen.  We must fight for Israeli democracy even if Anat Kamm cannot or will not do so herself.  And even if the Israeli press cannot or will not do so itself.  On that note, Haaretz, who used Kam’s materials for its scoop, has so far written nothing about her predicament.  That seems to me an unfortunate editorial decision.

The Israeli sources who have written about this note that there is a military gag under preventing reporting not only about the alleged leak, but that Kamm was arrested at all.  I call this censorship of infinite regress.  Which may explain why Haaretz has been silent. One hopes the Israeli press will find their voice and do their duty as journalists regardless of the strictures of the national security state.

Those who believe in Israeli democracy should explain how a citizen can disappear without a trace.  Is this China, where the government denies it even is detaining a troublesome dissident who has disappeared?  Is this the face Israel wants the world to see?  Does the security apparatus have the right to run roughshod over whatever civil liberties citizens retain?  I should add that this isn’t quite as bad as China.  Some people now know what happened to Anat Kamm.  She is safe although under detention.  But other than that, there are a lot of what Don Rumsfeld was fond of calling, in that inimitable way he had with the English language, “known unknowns.”

Apparently, it took over a year, but they have finally closed in on Kamm as the culprit.  They have really put the fear of God into her.  As Israeli bloggers and activists have become aware of this incident and written about it publicly, associates of Kamm have approached them asking that they desist.  Each individual has to consult their conscience in situations like this.  But I personally can see no benefit to Israeli democracy or even Kamm herself by keeping silent.  Undoubtedly, intelligence agencies have threatened her with horrible punishments if she doesn’t maintain absolute muteness.  As a 23-year-old relatively unfamiliar with the school of hard knocks that is the Shin Bet or military intelligence (where she presumably worked and which presumably investigated the leak), she’s quaking in her boots.  Who could blame her?

But I think that others need to have different priorities.  Even if Kamm doesn’t want to, or can’t fight for herself we must do so ourselves.  And again, we do this for the sake of Israeli democracy.  We do this to attempt to draw red lines and prevent the intelligence services from crossing them.  For we know that the Israeli national security state puts little stock in the rights of its citizens–witness the trampling of the rights of those whose passports and identities were stolen by the Mossad in carrying out the Dubai assassination.

We must make common cause with those Israelis and human rights NGOs who fight against such outrages.  As such, a measure of thanks is due the Israel Democracy Institute and its ejournal, The Seventh Eye, which has featured fine reporting on this matter.  Sol Salbe has directed me to an excellent archive of linked online articles about Kam’s situation.  Indymedia Israel also wrote up the story (web page now taken down) providing additional information.  Maariv published a highly allusive piece by Kam’s apparent boss, which reminds me of samizdat of decades past, which satirized the political culture of authoritarian regimes through allegory, indirection and oblique allusion.  Here is the first sentence:

How can a journalist be detained for over a month and everyone stays silent?  The journalists in Shoo-Shoo-land must be nonentities, otherwise it would be impossible to explain how in the past month not a single one of them wrote a single word on the journalist’s detention.

Let’s not forget that we’re talking about the Only Democracy in the Middle East here.  And lest we forget how the Shin Bet has dealt in the past with similarly damaging incidents, we need only remind ourselves of the Kav 300 Affair.

I wonder why the spooks did not target Kamm sooner since she leaked the documents over a year ago.  Possibly, she was working on a current story they didn’t want to see the light of day and this prevented her from reporting it.  Or perhaps, the current political climate in which the far-right is running roughshod over the rights of peace and human rights activists with the approval of the government has emboldened the intelligence establishment to light out after practicing journalists.  It may also be possible that Kamm is part of a larger constellation and the investigation includes her, but goes beyond her as well.

We must fight back.  We must help Israeli democrats turn back this assault on freedom of the press, free speech, and democracy.

Supreme Court: Corporations Are People Too

Wednesday, March 17th, 2010

Citizens United v. FEC has to be one of the dumbest Supreme Court decisions since Dred Scott (if you exclude the ruling sanctioning the theft of the 2000 presidential election).  In this spirit, NPR featured probably the funniest news story of the day covering a campaign for Congress–by a corporation!  That wacky notion begins with this quote from Justice Stevens dissent in that case:

Under the majority’s view, I suppose it may be a First Amendment problem that corporations are not permitted to vote, given that voting is, among other things, a form of speech.



Murray Hill, Inc. is taking that one step farther, it’s going to run for Congress in Maryland.  The satiric possibilities here are endless and I’ll quote a few of the choicer lines from Eric Hensal who’s running the company’s campaign.  Here he notes his intent to run in the Republican primary and his frustration that Maryland election officials have refused to register his company as a voter:

…We need to be a registered voter to run in the Republican primary, which is the place we feel would be most hospitable to a corporate candidate. At least initially, but I guess down the road, you know, the logic of the decision again plays out, and the parties really won’t be so relevant.

Hensal here bemoans the fact that politicians have bid up the price of political influence.  Instead, he urges voters to save money by installing a company directly in Congress and so avoiding the middleman:

Well, we just believe that we should take the middleman out of politics. If you’re going to let the ability to have unlimited money flow from corporations, you know, into campaigns, well, you’ll just have greedy politicians sort of bidding up the price to do politics.

…The consumer would suffer over time, you know, paying a politics tax. So we’re just advocating taking the middleman out and directly electing corporations…

I love this killer campaign slogan:

…Clearly our one of our campaign themes is to put people second or even third, but we do, for now, need to make sure we have some votes.

Murray Hill, Inc., who Robert Siegel affectionately refers to as “Murray” throughout the interview, also has its own Facebook page with this slogan:

Corporations are people, too…I think the Supreme Court majority’s decision really brings that home. I think they set aside this whole old-fashioned notion that we are somehow endowed by a creator with inalienable rights, and it’s a superstition that they just put aside and really focused on what speech is for them, which is a product.So for us, why not run for Congress? I mean, we’re challenging a political system that’s, frankly, sort of biased towards bodied people.

Here, Hensal explores the brilliant notion that corporations suffer discrimination just like ethnic minorities and are deserving of protection under the Civil Rights Act:

…We’re fighting an uphill battle, but we need to challenge these things just like civil rights movements have challenged boundaries for, you know, generations.

Political satire can provide such delicious revenge for right-wing stupidity!

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
Performance Optimization WordPress Plugins by W3 EDGE