Mahzor

New York Public Library

Churches

Sarajevo Haggadah

Mah Nishtanah

Sarajevo haggadah

Antaea Darom

Israeli women's art

Action

Torah as music

Ben Heine

Action

ceramic bowl

Mohammad Said Kalash, "Offering Reconciliation" exhibit (photo: Ilan Amihai)

Action

Punch and Judy/Pinchas and Jamila

Avi Katz

Action

David Grossman

Ben Heine

Action

Eldrige Street shul

Lower East Side

Action

Dove

Ben Heine

Action

Two birds

Hoda Jamal

Action

Israeli and Palestinian boys

from documentary, Promises

Action

Cat in the Hat

Yiddish version

Action

Daylight through the Wall

Banksy: graffiti art on Separation Wall

Action

Maurice Sendak's Brundibar set

New Victory Theater (photo: Nan Melville/NYT)

Action

Daniel Barenboim, West-Eastern Divan Orchestra

Palestinian-Israeli musical ensemble (photo: Kerstin Joensson/AP)

Action

Great Day on Eldrige Street

N.Y.'s klezmer greats celebrate shul rededication (photo: Leo Sorel)

Action

Joint Appeal for Peace

(Avi Katz)

Joint Appeal for Peace

Ketubah, Ancona, Italy (1772)

(Jewish Theological Seminary library)

Ancona ketubah

Archive for March, 2010

Yediot Achronot: ‘Poor Pitiful Me, I Want to Tell You About Anat Kamm, But the Bad Censor Man Won’t Let Me’

Wednesday, March 31st, 2010

I’m growing very tired of the Israeli media’s whiny self-pity in writing about why they can’t write about the Anat Kam story.  Take a story in today’s Yediot Achronot:

For Foreigners Only

What Does the Shabak Want You Not to Know?

Foreign media outlets publish about an incident whose details you can also discover on the internet.  Only Israeli resident cannot know about them.

What citizens around the world are allowed to know is concealed from Israelis: foreign newspapers and media report an incident which cannot cannot be reported in Israel.

Among the foreign news outlets many of the details of the incident and information about the subjects of it are reported.  All these details one can find also on the internet if one searches under the keywords “Israeli journalist gag.”

As has been reported here in the past, Israeli courts easily accede to requests from the police and Shabak for gag orders.  The gag only impacts one party, the one which investigates.

In a situation like this one, Israeli media outlets have no opportunity to present in a timely way their position opposing the gag order and supporting publication.

If this is such a crappy system, why doesn’t the Israeli press and Knesset unite to amend laws and eliminate the stranglehold that military censorship has over the media?  Instead of complaining, why don’t they actually do something?

In many previous similar instances, an Israeli reporter has offered a story to a foreign news outlet.  Once reported abroad the Israeli publication can reprise the story.  The first part of equation has has already happened.  The Independent reported the Anat Kam story.  JTA also reported it.  As a result of that the Arabic service of the Israeli Broadcasting Authority broke the story in Israel.  A few hours ago, the independent Palestinian news agency, Maan, broke the story.

So under conventional terms, this story should be all over Israel–well it is, it’s just not in the newspapers or on the news.  Israeli friends tell me that newspapers value their licenses and don’t deliberately court big fines and legal entanglements spanning years in order to uphold freedom of the press.  Well, yes I can understand that.  But if you take that approach, then you can’t expect anyone outside Israel to praise Israeli’s so-called free press.  Because it isn’t really free.  It’s fully subservient to the military-intelligence apparatus.

And it’s not just the press, the courts too are generally acquiescent.  They don’t probe too closely when cases involve national security, or at least the claim of it from the military or intelligence side.

So my attitude is: if you don’t want to stand up for your journalistic principles that’s a decision you make; but don’t come bellyaching to me like in this Yediot piece.  Sorry, but I don’t have any sympathy for it.  If you really care, you know what to do.  If you don’t, you have no one to blame but yourselves.

Nor am I letting the foreign news outlets off the hook.  Why has a story this important languished in obscurity?  Yes, I understand why the N.Y. Times won’t report it because of their reluctance to be out front on any story this controversial.  But what about The Nation, Christian Science Monitor, the Times of London?  Why aren’t they panting after this story and giving it column inches?  I’m half tempted to call this entire incident, The Day the Media Slept.

I also wanted to touch on a slightly different subject.  The Israeli press is terribly insular.  You might argue that this is only natural.  But think about it: Haaretz & Ynetnews online English editions derive a major amount of their traffic from the Diaspora.  Yet they hardly cover the Diaspora and when they do they do it perfunctorily and often badly (Haaretz’s coverage of the U.S. is a case in point).  They hardly ever publish material from Diaspora writers.  I’ve had a grand total of one commentary published in Haaretz.  Subsequently, the editor told me it was highly unlikely anything further would be published.

In normal times, a news website can get away with such insularity.  But in times like these, when the Israeli press can’t do its job, then it has to rely on Diaspora sources like this blog.  That’s why Haaretz’s editor yesterday began following my Twitter feed.  I’m pleased with this.  But I’d like a lesson to be learned.  That is, we’re in this together.  There should be a dialogue between Israel and Diaspora in the media.  But there largely isn’t.  And it ain’t because people like me aren’t trying.

If this happened, it could only benefit both sides.  It would increase interest in the sites from the Diaspora and would introduce Israelis to voices and ideas from outside their comfort zone.  But it probably won’t happen because editors don’t have the vision to make it happen.

H/t to O.A., a journalist doing his part.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Eliyahu Detained By IDF, No Seder Visits This Year

Wednesday, March 31st, 2010

Elijah's Cup (Arthur Syzk)


Elijah at the checkpoint (Al Jazeera)

Elijah the Prophet traditionally visits every Passover seder to partake of a sip of a special wine cup reserved for his enjoyment. During the telling of the story of the Exodus, Jews open their door and invite Elijah to join them. Such an invitation is a symbol of Jewish hospitality and an acknowledgment of Elijah’s role as a harbinger of redemption.

When we open the door to him, we sing:

Elijah the Prophet
Elijah the Tishbite [from the village of Tishbe]
Elijah the Giladi

Quickly and in our day
He will come to us
With the messiah son of David

For all the above reasons, this dark Passover joke circulated by anti-Occupation activists among Israelis is especially telling. A note of explanation: Gilead in ancient times was approximately where the northern West Bank is currently located:

ישראלים, אם אליהו הנביא לא בא אל שולחן הסדר שלכם, זה אולי בגלל שצה”ל מנע ממנו לעבור את המחסום
Israelis: if Elijah the Prophet didn’t come to your Passover table it may be because the IDF prevented him from crossing the checkpoint.

H/t  Ali Abunimah, Sol Salbe

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

U.S. Veto of UN Security Council Resolution on East Jerusalem: Will It or Won’t It?

Wednesday, March 31st, 2010

The Kabuki drama continues over a BBC report alleging that a U.S. representative (the story implies it was George Mitchell) told the Qatari prime minister that the former “would seriously consider abstaining” if a Security Council resolution condemning Israeli building in East Jerusalem was put forward.  Reports out of Israel claim that a different State Department official denied this account.  Though the denial is almost a non-denial:

The official told Ynet on Tuesday, “There is no such initiative before the (Security) Council, and we are not pursuing or encouraging any such action.”

None of this really contradicts the BBC report since it acknowledges too that there is no such resolution before the body currently.  And a statement that the U.S. would consider abstaining in such a vote could be construed as “not encouraging” such a resolution.

Clearly, this is part of the ongoing battle between the Obama and Netanyahu forces to see who will blink first regarding Jerusalem and the issue of peace negotiations.  Mitchell hopes that his statement will put added pressure on Bibi to accede to U.S. demands.  My view is that the only way Obama can prove his bona fides is by actually abstaining, rather than just talking about doing so.  As I’ve written before here, talk is cheap.  Israel has heard enough talk from U.S. administrations to last several lifetimes.  Only action gets Israel’s attention.

Laura Rozen reports on an ongoing battle within the U.S. administration on just this subject.  Mitchell wants to be tough and Dennis Ross leads the faction that wants us to back off Bibi:

White House Middle East strategist Dennis Ross is staking out a position that Washington needs to be sensitive to Netanyahu’s domestic political constraints including over the issue of building in East Jerusalem in order to not raise new Arab demands, while other officials including some aligned with Middle East peace envoy George Mitchell are arguing Washington needs to hold firm in pressing Netanyahu for written commitments to avoid provocations that imperil Israeli-Palestinian peace talks and to preserve the Obama administration’s credibility.

This comment is especially telling and will make Ross and the Israel lobby howl:

“He [Ross] seems to be far more sensitive to Netanyahu’s coalition politics than to U.S. interests,” one U.S. official told POLITICO Saturday. “And he doesn’t seem to understand that this has become bigger than Jerusalem but is rather about the credibility of this administration.”

Dennis uses the minutiae to blur the big picture … And no one asks the question: Why, since his approach in the Oslo years was such an abysmal failure, is he back, peddling the same snake oil?”

I essentially agree with this formulation though I’m sure Ross isn’t knowingly advancing Israel’s interests at the expense of our own.  He, like so many in the Israel lobby doesn’t see a great difference between the two.  And that’s precisely the problem.  Ross can’t imagine a showdown between Israel and the U.S. because he’s spent his entire life essentially articulating U.S policy through a pro-Israel prism.  Now is the time when independence is called for and Ross can’t muster any.

There are reports from Israel that the U.S. is asking Israel for a four-month freeze on construction in all Jewish neighborhoods of East Jerusalem during which time the U.S. would lobby for direct talks between Israel and the Palestinians.  The report of Israel’s response is liable to please or fool no one:

In discussions of the forum of seven senior cabinet ministers, the general view is that it will be impossible to publicly announce a freeze of construction in East Jerusalem. However, one possibility is that it will be possible to reach a tacit agreement with the U.S. administration on construction in East Jerusalem.

According to this idea, Israel would make it clear to the United States that during the coming four months no massive construction in East Jerusalem neighborhoods would be planned or carried out, enabling Israel to be seen as meeting the American and Palestinian demands.

This is clearly going to be a non-starter.  Imagine the death by a thousand paper cuts announcements of a few new units here and a few units there over the course of that four months.  It simply won’t wash.  The negotiations will be poisoned if there is any construction.  It will be interesting to see whether Obama can swallow this.  To me, it’s like the so-called compromise over the settlement freeze which essentially involved Bibi throwing up a smokescreen (a 10 month freeze excluding East Jerusalem) and the U.S. president saying he’d be happy with half a loaf.  You can see how well that worked out.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Haaretz Reporter in Self-Imposed Exile Over Top-Secret IDF Leaks

Tuesday, March 30th, 2010

Uri Blau: Israeli intelligence attempting to criminalize journalism?

Yesterday, I reported that Haaretz journalist Uri Blau is in self-imposed exile as a likely result of his publishing top secret IDF documents allegedly provided to him by Anat Kam.  Today, another reporter I was speaking to noticed that Blau has been publishing reports for Haaretz with a London dateline.  Though that is not the country a different source identified as where Blau now resides.  Wherever he is, we do know that he is a reporter in exile from his own country’s intelligence apparatus which appears to want to prosecute him for doing what good journalists do in virtually every democratic nation.

Blau left in December for a trip to Hong Kong with his girl friend.  An informant tells me that while there the authorities seized his computer (apparently after arresting Anat Kam) seeking evidence of involvement with her.  This may’ve been what caused him not to return.

When I began writing about this story I thought I was writing about a young do-gooder who leaked secret documents about IDF misbehavior out of a sense of duty to her country and its democratic values.  Now, I think this may be a story about an intelligence apparatus run amok who wants to criminalize the practice of journalism when it afflicts the military/intelligence elite.  It is bad enough that the Shin Bet secretly arrested Anat Kam and held her incommunicado for as long as it did.  But in the effort to take down Uri Blau we may have an even more disturbing story.

If anyone ever wants to understand the problem with a country not having a constitution with enumerated rights, this case illustrates it perfectly.  Israel has no freedom of the press in the sense that we do.  Journalists are not a protected class.  That’s why there can be military censorship (which operates under some supposed constraints established by the Supreme Court).  That’s why they can go after Uri Blau.  That is not to say that the Israeli press are docile and obsequious.  They can be quite probing.  But the fact that no Israeli publication has broken the Anat Kam gag order, despite the fact that The Independent’s Israel-based correspondent, Donald McIntyre, bravely reported this story yesterday, indicates how cowed the Israeli press can be regarding national security matters.

I remain concerned about the role that Anat Kam may be asked to play in this.  I fear that she is the little fish that the authorities will attempt to use to catch the big fish.

In a comment earlier today, Shraga Elam speculates that one of the things the police may wish to question Blau about is whether he actively encouraged Kam to steal the IDF documents.  My source tells me that Kam stole the documents without having any immediate media outlet for them.  It was only after she had the documents that she coordinated an arrangement with Blau.  Apparently, the two had already known each other before this incident occurred though I don’t know under what circumstance.

While I see Anat Kam as an individual having mixed motives, I am more sympathetic when I read how she is being trashed in the far-right Israeli online community.  At the right-wing internet forum, Rotter, phrases used to describe her were “spy,” “traitor,” “lock her up and throw away the key,” “to prison like Vanunu.”  It seems that extreme Israeli nationalism is ascendant and nothing can stand in its path in the current political climate.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Overseas Media Begins Reporting Kamm Case

Monday, March 29th, 2010

Before I get to the subject of this post I wanted to make a pitch for you to support this blog.  The Anat Kam case is the first time this blog has broken a major story concerning the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and I’m damn proud of it and all the readers and other sources who contributed to it.  You understand that Tikun Olam plays an important role in monitoring not only the Israeli media, but also serving as a watchdog over those who would trample over Israeli democracy and Palestinian rights.  You also know we play a role in advocating an assertive engagement by the U.S. government in the peacemaking process.  Imagine what it would be like if blogs like this one didn’t exist.

That’s why I want to ask you to support my work (or should I say OUR work?) with a financial contribution.  You can donate through Paypal or if you wish to avoid the 3% surcharge you can send a gift directly to me by contacting me, after which I’ll send you my mailing address.  And if I may be so bold, don’t make this a one-time thing.  If you can, send a gift regularly.

If you think this blog is important both to you and to the struggle for peace and justice in Israel-Palestine, please support it.  Of course, there are other things you can do to help as well.  If you make Amazon purchases and start your shopping through this site, your purchases will earn me a fee.  You can also help by introducing others to this site in order to increase my readership and my presence in the online community.  I’m proud to say that Alexa ranks this site as 138,000 (out of all blogs in the world), the largest readership it has ever had in the seven years of its existence.  Technorati ranks it 38th of all World Politics blogs.  We’re on a roll.  Let’s continue to make progress and make the world a better place.

*   *   *

The Israeli gag order in the Anat Kam is slowly being broken down by reporting from outside Israel.  After this blog broke the story, JTA followed suit.  Then the Arab service of the Israel Broadcasting Authority picked up on the JTA piece.  Today, Donald McIntyre, The Independent’s Israel correspondent wrote a report.  This is an especially important development, as he is the first Israel-based reporter to publish a story in an overseas publication.  It may embolden the Israeli press to finally break the gag.

Clarification: 'Due to a gag order we cannot tell you what we know. Due to laziness, apathy and blind faith in the defense establishment we know nothing at all.' (Maariv political satire)

Astonishingly so far, the gag seems to be holding despite the holes in the dike I’ve pointed out above.  On April 12th, there will be an appeal hearing brought by Haaretz and Channel 10 before the court which approved the original gag orders.  If we can get enough reporting published in other places before then, the court will have to lift the gag order.  Anat Kam’s trial is scheduled to begin on April 14th if she doesn’t cop a plea before then.

I am working with a publication similar to The Independent to publish a news story and possibly a commentary on the case in the coming days.  Perhaps with a few more cuts like these, this ogre will die a death by a thousand such journalistic paper cuts.

I wrote yesterday that Uri Blau, who allegedly wrote stories for Haaretz based on the top-secret IDF documents leaked to him by Anat Kam, was scheduled to return yesterday to Israel from a long trip/honeymoon to China that coincidentally began in December, the month Kam was secretly arrested.  A journalistic source tells me that Blau did not return to Israel and that he is in a western country I’d prefer not to name at this time.

After consulting another journalistic source, I feel strongly that there is no coincidence in Blau’s departure from Israel at the same time Kam was arrested.  Just as it is no accident that Blau has elected not to return to Israel.  Not only would Blau be liable to prosecution if he returns, I have a strong hunch that the negotiations between Kam’s attorneys and the attorney general may involve her getting no jail time in return for testifying against Blau.  I repeat that I do not know this for a fact and cannot document this.  If I am wrong, I will be delighted.  If I am not, I will feel sad to have two parties who collaborated in a righteous cause be driven to battling over who gets to go to prison for 10 or 20 years for their actions.

This case is extraordinarily important for many reasons, and it seems to me that neither the Israeli press nor the overseas press has paid proper attention to it.  Everyone no doubt has a reason and can defend or explain why they couldn’t do anything.  Which only adds to the shame.  The story is significant not just because it vividly confirms the disdain felt by the IDF toward the Israeli Supreme Court and the rule of law; and not just because it illuminates the absolute power the Israeli intelligence services have virtually to disappear citizens, and this in an alleged western-style democracy; but it is especially important because of the bitterly hostile political environment in Israel right now toward human rights and democratic values.  For those of you who remember personally or learned about the McCarthy era in school, Israel is closer to this dark age than any time in my lifetime.

I read on another blog that Israel today has the type of government, adhering to the type of policies that Dick Cheney would’ve imposed here if he could have.  Think of Dick Cheney ruling an incipient police state.  That’s what Israel resembles more and more.  No, it hasn’t quite come to that yet.  There are brave democratic forces fighting back like those in Sheikh Jarrah, like Naomi Chazan and the New Israel Fund.  There are journalists like Gideon Levy and others fighting the good fight.  But they are no match for the overweening force of the national security state.

My friend and ally Avner Cohen told me when this story was breaking that the case is larger than what was known at that time.  I didn’t know what he meant but now perhaps I have a better idea (though I still don’t know all and have no idea whether this was what Avner was referring to).  A source who spoke with someone well-placed, claims that Anat Kam didn’t take just the two documents that were displayed in the 2008 Haaretz report.  In fact, she may’ve taken as many as 1,000 documents.  If this is true, then it explains why the original story might’ve passed military censorship (a development I found astonishing considering that it allowed the Israeli public to view highly damaging top secret IDF documents in the public newspaper).  The censor might have negotiated with Haaretz to allow this report to be published in return for embargoing any other future stories related to the other documents.

This might also explain why the military is very eager to get Uri Blau.  It must make an example of an Israeli journalist who has violated the code of secrecy that envelops the IDF and its security operations like targeted assassination.  It must do so for the sake of any other future journalist who considers getting out of line as Blau did.

Finally, I want to concede that I am no Seymour Hersh.  I do not have well-placed sources in every corner of Israel nor do I have a staff who can vet every piece of information I learn for accuracy.  But I hear what I hear and know what I know.  Considering the shroud of secrecy both Anat Kam, the Shin Bet and IDF have dropped over this incident, I think we’re doing a pretty good job.  I know I haven’t gotten everything right.  But when the gag order is dropped and sources begin to speak more freely, I’d be willing to bet that you and I are doing to be damn proud of the reporting on this story.

In the meantime, let’s do what we can to slay the beast of opacity, secrecy and the national security state.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Next Year in a Shared Jerusalem!

Sunday, March 28th, 2010

Next year in Jerusalem, capital of Palestine...and Israel (Gerard Horton)

The closing invocation of the traditional seder is l’shana ha-ba’ah b’Yerushalayim (“Next year in Jerusalem”).  It’s sung to a rousing melody and can be quite moving and liberating especially after a long seder narrative.  Barack Obama plans a White House seder tomorrow with his Jewish and African-American staff.  I’d suggest a slogan that most of us can get behind: “Next year in a shared Jerusalem” (…Yerushalayim meshutefet).

Bibi’s seder is going to hear something quite different: “Next year in Sheikh Jarrah, next year in Ramat Shlomo, next year in a rebuilt Temple.”  That tells you all you need to know about the difference between the kind of Jew Bibi is and the kind of Jew I am.

Our ancestors were slaves in Egypt who threw off the yoke of bondage through violent resistance to oppression.  Their resistance earned them liberation, freedom and the right to live as free men and women in their own land.  Their leader was an angry man who himself killed an Egyptian taskmaster, no doubt transforming him into a terrorist in his day in the eyes of the Egyptian Pharoah.  Remind you of anyone?  Not many Israelis are going to be thinking of this as they celebrate Passover seder.  Not many Israelis ever think much about the Palestinians unless they’re forced to do so.  And it’s a shame really.

Back in the day when this blog was young and no one read it, I wrote a long essay, The Life of Moses as an Allegory of Jewish Existence, about the character of Moses and his relationship to contemporary issues of Jewish identity.  It makes good Passover reading.  I’ve also written numerous Passover-themed posts to which I’ve devoted much thought and attention.  You can recollect them in tranquility here.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Ron Kampeas Breaks Anat Kamm Story in Jewish MSM

Sunday, March 28th, 2010

Avner Cohen brought me news that Ron Kampeas broke the Anat Kam story today in JTA for the mainstream Jewish media.  Kol ha-kavod to him.  And thanks also for his tip of the hat acknowledgement of my contribution to the story.

Ron does provide some “value-added” reporting noting that Kam faces up to 16 years in prison for her alleged role in leaking top secret IDF memos to Haaretz.  Those memos proved that the army was ignoring a major Israeli Supreme Court ruling that prohibited targeted assassinations except under certain limited conditions.  I’ve been told by an Israeli who spoke to her that her attorneys are hoping that she can cop a plea for no jail time.

Is Uri Blau a wanted man?

Which leads me to ask how can someone spilling such important IDF beans ever hope to get no jail time?  I speculate (emphasis on the word “speculate”) that she may be offering, or the IDF/Shin Bet/Attorney General may be seeking to use her to fry a much bigger fish: the Haaretz reporter to whom she leaked the memos, Uri Blau.

I’ve been mystified how the Haaretz story passed military censorship, given that it included physical reproductions of the two secret memos.  I’ve never heard of the IDF allowing such material published before this.  There has to be a reason we’re not aware of that the IDF felt compelled to allow this through censorship.  At any rate, after allowing it to be published it would seem to me that Uri Blau would have to have a target on his back as far as the IDF and Shin Bet was concerned.

Today, brings an unconfirmed (by me) report via a knowledgeable journalistic source that Uri Blau has left Israel.  [UPDATE: I have heard several somewhat conflicting reports about this.  One says that left Israel in December (the same month Kam was arrested) on a trip to China with his girlfriend.  Another report says that he was on an extended honeymoon.  His Facebook page says that he'll be returning to Israel today.]  Again, one can only speculate why, but we should have a pretty good idea.  It’s the same reason that Azmi Bishara left Israel before he was charged by the Shin Bet with the equivalent of treason.  Blau would not have left the country unless he had a strong conviction that the Shin Bet and police were about to either arrest him or charge him in the case.  He knew what they’d done to Kam by secretly arresting her and slapping an infinite regress gag order preventing publication about her detention and the reasons for it.  He chose to leave rather than face prison for merely doing his job.  As in the Bishara case, if Blau did leave the country one might ask why the Shin Bet allowed him to do so?  I suspect it would’ve faced a massive firestorm of protest from the few Israeli democrats remaining inside the country.

My only hope, and one first offered to me by Avner Cohen, who’s experienced some of the same harassment by the intelligence services, is that disclosure of this sorry mess by Ron Kampeas will force the security services to back off.  That’s the reason I have reported this story myself.  I only hope that what Kampeas and I have done, and hopefully the follow-up reporting by the thus-far spineless Israeli and foreign press corps, will stop this thing before it turns into a real mess and stain on Israeli democracy.

Keep in mind that Walla until recently was owned by Haaretz.  I’m sorry to raise such cynical speculation but it may be warranted.  Can it be an accident that Kam leaked the memos to Haaretz during her military service and that after she left the army she went to work for a Haaretz subsidiary?  Instead of a do-gooder whistleblower, might we have a mole seeking to build a career for herself as a journalist?  I’m not dismissing the chance that there was some moral motivation in her actions.  But given that she wrote a disparaging Walla piece about Israeli conscientious objectors, one wonders how strong that motivation might’ve been.

Another interesting matter: one Israeli source said that Kam, after her arrest was suspended without pay.  A different source tells me that Kam was actually fired.  If you were a Haaretz or Walla editor would you suspend or fire a journalist who’d been arrested for leaking documents to one of your reporters?  It doesn’t make sense if you value whistleblowers and hope to have any turn to your reporters in the future.  I’m guessing that there was some major parting of the ways involving the legal manuvering in this case, that caused Walla to dump her.

The fact that a source told me that Kam has blamed Haaretz for ‘outing’ her is yet another indication that all is not well between these two parties.

Finally, Kampeas quotes Haaretz’s editor denying any connection between Kam and the IDF memo story:

Dof Alfon, the editor in chief of Haaretz, said the linkage between Kam’s arrest and the 2008 article, made in a number of blogs, is “absurd.” He implied that the investigative reporter, Uri Blau, had obtained the information without assistance from Kam.

I hesitate to say this since so much of this story is based on rumor and speculation, but Alfon’s denial doesn’t seem credible.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Clarion Fund Mystery Donor to Inject Millions in November Elections Throgh Iran Mushroom-Cloud Propaganda Film

Saturday, March 27th, 2010

Those of you who read this blog during the last presidential campaign will remember the Clarion Fund, which spent $15-million to distribute its Islam-hating Obsession to 28-million voters in swing states.  The purpose was to scare Jewish voters and others frightened of the ‘Muslim menace’ into voting Republican.  You can see how well that strategy worked.

Thanks to Sarah Posner, Justin Elliott and reader John Dickerson for alerting me to a story about those folks who brought you two perfect-storm anti-Muslim films (Obsession and Third Jihad).  They plan to do to Iran what they did to Islamism.  Note the mushroom-cloud in the film promotion and the claim that Iran will use nuclear weapons to destroy everything we in the west hold dear, including Israel.  And like their last electoral effort, this one will be timed to the upcoming November elections.

Last time around, a media expert quoted by Ali Gharib and Eli Clifton estimated that the Obsession DVD distribution cost between $15-50-million.  Justin Elliott does his homework and finds that Clarion took in $18-million in 2008 and spent $15-million, most of this on the cost of duplicating the DVD.  The Fund’s 990 report doesn’t specify who gave the $18-million, but there are any number of right-wing Jewish Republican fatcats who’d be only too pleased to do so.  In the past, several have speculated it might be Sheldon Adelson.  But given Clarion Fund is an extension of the far-right pro-settler Aish HaTorah, my money is on a fellow far-right Orthodox donor.  Someone like Irving Moskowitz or Rabbi Irwin Katsof, a billionaire co-founder of Aish.

Elliott’s piece gives us an early warning of the shenanigans planned by the Jewish crackpot-right like Clarion and the Republican Jewish Coalition.  I like to say that it’s good that they waste their money on such ineffective projects.  If they didn’t, they might actually discover an effective way to do damage against the Democrats.  Garbage like this won’t.  So I say, along with a thankfully retired president, “Bring it on.”

During the last election, much of the Jewish media featured distorted, misleading ads from the Republican Jewish Coalition touting fear of Barack “Hussein” Obama as anti-Israel.  No doubt, Clarion’s Jewish Daddy Warbucks will pay for swank ads in the same publications touting the Iran mushroom cloud film.  I’d urge them to consider what Clarion Fund is and consider the lies of their previous two films.  Jewish Week, The Forward, Haaretz and JTA clearly need revenue in this terrible climate for print media, but do they need it so badly they have to take funds promoting such garbage?

Here are a few choice quotations from the film’s finely calibrated press release:

Since the inception of the Islamic Revolution in 1979, Iran has displayed hatred for the West.  Coupled with an extremist and apocalyptic messianic ideology, this regime has terrorized the world at large for over 30 years.

…The film will document…the West’s inability to recognize the true nature of an extremist Islamic Revolutionary regime…

I was just glancing at Clarion’s website, Radical Islam, when I noticed this absolutely hilarious Facebook feed:

Al-Qaida is laying deadly “booby traps” by equipping its female suicide bombers with explosive breast implants [!] that are impossible to be detected at airport security checkpoints…

The source?  That impeccable font of anti-jihadi wisdom, Robert Spencer’s Jihad Watch!  Should we speculate how Orthodox settlers might conceal their explosives should they ever turn to suicide bombing as a tactic for killing Palestinians?  Perhaps explosive tallises (which they wear as an undergarment)?

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
Performance Optimization WordPress Plugins by W3 EDGE