Mahzor

New York Public Library

Churches

Sarajevo Haggadah

Mah Nishtanah

Sarajevo haggadah

Antaea Darom

Israeli women's art

Action

Torah as music

Ben Heine

Action

ceramic bowl

Mohammad Said Kalash, "Offering Reconciliation" exhibit (photo: Ilan Amihai)

Action

Punch and Judy/Pinchas and Jamila

Avi Katz

Action

David Grossman

Ben Heine

Action

Eldrige Street shul

Lower East Side

Action

Dove

Ben Heine

Action

Two birds

Hoda Jamal

Action

Israeli and Palestinian boys

from documentary, Promises

Action

Cat in the Hat

Yiddish version

Action

Daylight through the Wall

Banksy: graffiti art on Separation Wall

Action

Maurice Sendak's Brundibar set

New Victory Theater (photo: Nan Melville/NYT)

Action

Daniel Barenboim, West-Eastern Divan Orchestra

Palestinian-Israeli musical ensemble (photo: Kerstin Joensson/AP)

Action

Great Day on Eldrige Street

N.Y.'s klezmer greats celebrate shul rededication (photo: Leo Sorel)

Action

Joint Appeal for Peace

(Avi Katz)

Joint Appeal for Peace

Ketubah, Ancona, Italy (1772)

(Jewish Theological Seminary library)

Ancona ketubah

Archive for February, 2010

Dubai: When Is Murder Not Murder? When Yuli Edelstein Says It Isn’t

Monday, February 22nd, 2010

Hasbara minister, Yuli Edelstein, defending the indefensible

Yuli Edelstein, is an Israeli settler with the dubious distinction of running something called in Hebrew, the Hasbara Ministry (somehow in English calling him the ‘public diplomacy minister’ has a much suaver ring to it).  As such, Yuli’s not going to let any buffoonish Mossad performance throw him off message.  The Dubai assassination?  Easy, it wasn’t even murder.  What was it?  A favor Israel did to the world to rid it of Arab pond scum:

The killing of a senior Hamas official in Dubai should not be considered as murder, an Israeli minister said today.

Public diplomacy minister Yuli Edelstein…speaking to a meeting of the Henry Jackson Society think tank at the House of Commons, said that it would be wrong to become “overly emotional” about his death.

“Even if it will turn out that the worst secret service of the worst country in the world had managed to get to that guy, I will still not call it murder,” he said.

“We are talking about the worst murderer in one of the worst terrorist organisations, so let’s not get overly emotional about his death and let’s not start mourning his death.”

Let it not be said that Israel’s Hasbara minister has let the facts get in his way.  First, over 20 years ago, al-Mabouh was responsible for murdering two IDF soldiers and he currently arranged for arms deals with Iran.  Hardly the worst murderer in Hamas.  Second, the claim that Hamas is one of “the worst terrorists organizations,” again highly debatable.  But the question remains, if Hamas is a terrorist organization and al-Mabouh is a terrorist, what right does Israel have to adopt the tactics of the terrorist to take its revenge?

Further, if Israel is justified in murdering al-Mabouh, what do we say about the assassination of Rehavam Zeevi under eerily similar circumstances at an East Jerusalem hotel where he lived.  Why is Zeevi’s murder, assassination and al-Mabouh’s isn’t?  That’s an indefensible distinction that I don’t expect Edelstein to understand, but that less politically conflicted people will easily comprehend.

As I’ve written here–if Hamas or Hezbollah succeed someday in assassinating an Israeli political figure why should the world not consider this a legitimate act of revenge?  If Edelstein refuses to call al-Mabouh’s killing a murder then why would an act of revenge on an Israeli victim be murder?  Israel, in its predictably short-term approach to these things, refuses to understand the rhetorical/political implications of its words and deeds.  There is a certain narcissism, as my reader Shirin likes to point out–you can say virtually whatever you want and whatever is convenient to defend your own behavior, but your statements cannot be used against you at some future point.  It’s as if Israel can say whatever the hell it likes and devil take the hindmost.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Stand With Us Tours IDF Boosters to Counter Gaza War Criticism

Monday, February 22nd, 2010

IDF soldiers on Stand With Us Israeli booster tour (Stand With Us)

Stand With Us just began a national hasbara speaking tour of IDF boosters whose appearances are designed to combat criticism of Israel’s Gaza War.  I just found out about the tour today and apparently the soldiers slipped into Seattle barely announced and spoke at the University of Washington.  Not even the campus Hillel rabbi or local Jewish newspaper editor knew where they spoke.  Alas, I didn’t have an opportunity to give them the truly hospitable Seattle welcome they deserved.

The tour is scheduled for these communities: New York, Los Angeles, Chicago, Wisconsin, Seattle, Philadelphia, Connecticut and San Jose, CA.

One quite interesting fact I learned was that one of the west coast speakers is Lior Prosor.  That family name is quite unusual in Israel so I immediately thought he must be at least a relative, if not son of Ron Prosor, Israel’s ambassador to the UK.  Turns out Lior is Ron’s son.  Why am I not surprised that SWU would send out the son of one of Israel’s leading government hasbarists on this tour?

Interestingly, Prosor Sr. has gained a certain level of notoriety in the media recently by refusing to cooperate in the British investigation of the Dubai assassination and Israeli abuse of British passports.  Additionally, someone in Prosor’s embassy had the awful taste to tweet that Israel tennis player, Shahar Peer, had put out a “hit” on her Dubai opponent (it was supposed to be funny and not literal).  Considering that the bumbling Mossad killers in Dubai had worn tennis outfits to disguise themselves, it was in egregiously poor taste.  The tweet mysteriously disappeared a day or so later (why did it take so long for them to discover that this was an atrocious bit of hasbara?).

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

‘Brooklyn Bundler,’ Chabad Rabbi, Charged With $4-Million Extortion

Monday, February 22nd, 2010

Rabbi 'Bunco' Balkany the 'Brooklyn Bundler' and Republican Fund-Raising Wunderkind

Brooklyn Chabad Rabbi Milton Balkany has been accused of extorting $3.25-million from a New York hedge fund in order to fend off a non-existent federal probe of insider trading allegations. Unfortunately, the notion that Orthodox rabbis engage in acts of corruption is not news. What is news is this fellow’s previous background. He is the consummate political inside operative who represents the powerful interests of Brooklyn’s Orthodox community. His fundraising (hence his nickname, “Brooklyn Bundler”) prowess on behalf of pro-Israel, Aipac-favored largely Republican candidates is legendary. The names of politicians he’s fundraised for is long: D’Amato, Inoyue, Giuliani, Pataki, Dole, Bush, Lott, Fitzgerald, Sununu, Humphrey (Gordon), Talent, and Schumer to list but a few.  One of my sources tells me that much of his political fundraising was done in close collaboration with none other than Joe Lieberman.

According to the Village Voice, this is how the lurid conversation went between Balkany and the reputed hedge fund president (who in reality was a federal agent):

“I think it’s a very minor price for the package over here. I think if this ever got into what [the government] wants to bring, it would cost [the Hedge Fund Manager] ten million [dollars] in lawyers…It’s a very inexpensive way out. You know what I mean? …I’m not holding up anybody here.”He also offered his own experiential notion of what happens when the feds launch one of their probes:

“The government is like this. They throw a bucket of mud, that even if the guy gets out, when he gets done going through the whole publicity and the whole everything else, the guy’s destroyed.”

And: “If the FBI should be running after the [Hedge Fund Manager], they could destroy the man. You know what I mean? I don’t care how many billions he has, these guys come and they — they’re merciless.”

His own motives, however, were pure: “I’m not a hold-up man. I’m not here to threaten some — God forbid, I, I’m on the other side of the fence.”

In cases like this, shaking a single apple from the tree often brings down other loose fruit, so one wonders whether other stories will emerge of Balkany’s gonofdik behavior.  Any politician who’s ever done this slime a favor should be shivering in their boots.  I’ll link to a few of his previous bouts of grand larceny, this one involving Bob Dole, computers for Russian Jews, and AID.  In 2003, the good rabbi skimmed $700,000 in housing money meant for the handicapped for personal profit.  The feds dropped the case, requiring only $400,000 restitution.  This coup from the Giuliani days represents one of his more legal “arrangements” on behalf of the Brooklyn Orthodox community.  FailedMessiah also claims Balkany was barred from participation in a federal prison chaplain program because he sold his services to inmates and their families.  This guy is a regular mafioso. He extorts money from the prisoner AND from the prisoner’s ex-employer (in this case the hedge fund).  That’s simply magnificent as a feat of double larceny!

He married into the prominent Rubashkin Chabad family, owners of Agriprocessors, the largest kosher meat company in the U.S., which was recently embroiled in a massive scandal.

At least with other Orthodox rabbi-thieves they can say they were using the money on behalf of their synagogues or schools.  Balkany was a real goniff though because much of his purloined cash, even funds extorted on behalf of his Orthodox girl’s school, ended up in his and other family members’ personal bank accounts. Someone who is Orthodox will have to enlighten me on what someone like Balkany could spend such enormous sums.  He doesn’t have the same set of possible vices that other con men might have.  He can’t do drugs, can’t drive fancy cars, can’t spend it on the ladies.  So where could he possibly blow this dough?  Las Vegas?  West Bank settlements?

On a related note, recently Brooklyn African-American Congressmember Yvette Clarke joined the Gaza 54 to call for easing the Gaza siege.  After a meeting with some very somber looking Chabad rabbis in her office, she abjectly announced that she’d seen the light and would be engaging in no such anti-Israel shenanigans in future.  I wouldn’t be at all surprised if Rabbi B’s fingerprints were all over that one.

On that note, let’s examine some IRS 990s and see where the good rabbi’s largesse may be going other than into his own, and his family’s pockets.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Bibi Names Cave of Patriarchs, Where Goldstein Murdered 29, as National Heritage Site

Monday, February 22nd, 2010

The list of surreal developments reeled off by the Netanyahu government continues apace. Haaretz reports that his Shas coalition partner persuaded the PM that Rachel’s Tomb and the Cave of the Patriarchs, where Kahanist serial killer Baruch Goldstein made his Alamo-like last stand, should be named as national heritage sites.  Could it be that Bibi wishes to embrace this massacre of Palestinians in an act of national atonement thereby marking the Cave as an Israel heritage site?  Nah.

In light of this development, I suggest that Mahmoud Abbas propose that West Jerusalem and other abandoned Israeli-Palestinian villages be named Palestinian national heritage sites since 700,000 exiled Palestinians lived in them before 1948.

I’m urging Mexico to put in a similar claim for the Alamo. After all, it was once Mexico’s territory and a famous battle was fought there which Mexican forces won.  It was even a massacre just like the Cave of the Patriarchs.  Why shouldn’t they claim it as a Mexican heritage site and reclaim the Alamo for Mexico since it was stolen from them in the 19th century?

Israel too should put in a claim to the territory of the Khazars on the basis of Yehuda Ha-Levi’s claim that their king coverted to Judaism centuries ago.  That’s certainly a Jewish national heritage site.  The fact that it may be smack dab in the middle of the Ukrainian steppes should be of little moment to anyone.

Titus' Arch confirms historic Italian-Roman claim to Jerusalem

And let’s also recognize Slobodan Milosevic’s claim to Kosovo on the basis of the birthing of the Serbian nation there close to a millenium ago and a lost Serbian battle fought in the 14th century.

Similarly, I’d encourage Japan to name Nanjing as a Japanese heritage site since it once occupied that city and all of China.  The rape of Nanjing was clearly an important event in Japanese history.  Why shouldn’t Japan renew its territorial claim to Nanjing on that basis?  I’m also going to write to prime minister Berlusconi, who has a thing for Italian national greatness, to name Jerusalem as an Italian heritage site since ancient Rome occupied Israel for quite a long time.  Titus’ Arch in the Roman Forum certainly proves the Roman claim to Jerusalem and justifies reclaiming the city that was such an important part of Roman greatness in antiquity.

I think the Vatican should lay physical claim to Bethlehem as theirs since it was the birthplace of their Lord.  Maybe they should claim Jerusalem too since he died there.  Or imagine someday that we can clone an extinct Neanderthal and bring him back to life.  He too should have the right to demand all of his ancient hunting grounds returned as Neanderthal heritage sites.

Don’t ya know, there’s going to be Zionist history museums built on both sites to the tune of $100 million:

Netanyahu said the two sites would be added to a list that includes areas to be designated for refurbishment. The state will thus allot NIS 400 million to renovate the sites, which include museums and landmarks of key moments in Zionist history.

I’ll bet ya dollars to donuts the Cave of the Patriarchs exhibit is going to avoid a certain historic massacre like the plague.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Bibi and Meir: Tennis Anyone?

Sunday, February 21st, 2010

An amalgam of Bibi/Meir challenge the world to a game of tennis (Dave Brown/Independent)

The buffonization of the Mossad continues with cartoons like this one.  And someone’s created new Facebook accounts in the assumed names of the Dubai killers.  The one dedicated to “Gail Folliard” lists her college as “MI6″ class of ’99.  Gail loves to travel and the odd tennis match:

Love playing Tennis.
Enjoys traveling and seeing new places – especially short visits.

But I fear that some of the Israelis who created her account and others who friended her don’t fully comprehend the irony.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Canadian Jewish Tourism Ad Uses Oral Sex to Promote Israeli Tourism

Sunday, February 21st, 2010


UPDATE: The video was originally hosted by Vimeo, which removed it after a complaint that it featured “explict sexual content.” Bad taste, for sure. But “explicit” content? It is instructive though, at least in a symbolic sense, that Vimeo finds such Israeli hasbara is video pornography. H/t Robin.

Dimi Reider has discovered one of the stranger of Israel’s tourism promotions.  This one is sponsored by the Canadian Council for Israel and Jewish Advocacy (CIJA) undoubtedly in close collaboration with the foreign ministry.  The video is in indescribably bad taste, portraying an attractive couple in bed with the woman telling the man she can’t possibly “do it” because it’s “too small.”  The dialogue is so lame that it simply must be quoted to be believed:


Girl: Uhhh…
Boy: What?
G: Don’t be mad…It’s just that it’s small…
B: Small?!
G: I don’t know if I can go there.
B: I consider this a spot of worship. It may be small, but it’s brought the driest places to life. Baby, this is paradise. [camera pans to show map of Israel and tourist guidebooks covering boy's crotch].
G: OK, but if I go down there for you, you have to promise you’ll down south for me next winter.

I’m simply flabbergasted that Israel would use the promise of fellatio and cunnilingus to promote itself. This also puts into proper perspective the blandishments of Birthright Israel and its former premier trip vendor, Shlomo Momo, who hold out to trip participants the possibility of great Jewish sex and meeting potential Jewish mates on their trips.

There are just way too many strange, odd places to go with this evocative video. Do you notice the phallic outline of Israel in the video’s opening image? What does it say about the creator’s fixation on the symbolic size of Israel’s, er member? Maybe Israel is compensating for this sense of sexual inferiority with its “muscular” Occupation (h/t to Ali Gharib)?

The website devised to promote this tourism campaign portrays Israel as a hipster paradise full of models, beaches, bronzed bodies, and beautiful modern metropolises. If I caught it correctly, there’s an image of a dread-locked Idan Raichel thrown in for good measure. Yes sir, Israel is nothing but sun and fun. Not a hint of politics. Not even culture, art or music. And certainly not an Arab in sight. In fact, here are some factoids of which the hasbara machine wants you to be proud:

Did you KNOW?

* On a per capita basis, Israel has the largest number of biotechnology startup companies in the world
* Israel is a world leader in water conservation and reforestation
* Arab Israelis have served as elected representatives of the Knesset (Parliament) since Israel was founded

Israel is a welcoming and inclusive country

* In 1999, an Arab woman was named as “Miss Israel”
* Israeli Arabs serve on the Israeli Supreme Court
* Israel is at the forefront of promoting equality for LGBT communities, as well as promoting women’s rights
* In 1969 Golda Meir was elected as Israel’s Prime Minister – the third elected woman leader of any other country in the world

Speaking of Israel’s technological innovation, did you get a load of those Mossad killers talking into their wrists with that cool gear that communicated with their Austrian command center? Now that’s innovation! Not to mention the cool floppy hat worn by the Mossad babe who was stalking the victim. If that isn’t fashion sense, what is? And how ’bout targeted assassinations in general? What a neat innovation Israel has perfected and given as a gift to the Palestinians and the rest of the world.

How ’bout those claims about Israeli Arabs? Holy shit, Batman! There are Arab Israelis who’ve been elected to the Knesset! I bet you thought they were all dishwashers, daily laborers and maids. No kidding. Of course, this “fact” omits the real fact that Arab political parties are excluded from governing coalitions, and rarely are individual Arab Knesset members named government ministers and so have almost no political power.

And yes, Israel is an inclusive and welcoming country if you’re a Jew. If you’re not, not so much.

Regarding Arabs sitting on the Supreme Court, this neglects the fact that the daughter of Israel’s Arab justice was treated like an Arab terrorist by the Shin Bet when she attempted to leave Israel. Israel is at the forefront of gay rights…except when crazy haredim stab gay marchers in Gay Pride parades, when haredi rabbis denounce gays as evil Sodomites, and when Tel Aviv gay community centers are attacked by crazed gunmen. As for Golda, that’s very nice except that the percentage of women in the Knesset is miserably low and women hold almost no major cabinet portfolios.

Is this any way to promote a country? You bet it ain’t. But one thing I have to say–this is yet another ‘brilliant’ manipulation brought to you by those boys, Yvette and Danny, and their most excellent adventure at the Israeli foreign ministry. At the rate they’re going, there may not be much of an Israel left to promote before too long.

This advertising campaign is part of a joint Israel rebranding effort organized by the Israeli consulate in Canada and Canadian Jewish business leaders including the Asper family and Jason Reitman, who also chairs CIJA. An earlier effort at this type of rebranding included the Toronto Film Festival’s honoring Tel Aviv’s 100th birthday in an effusion of pro-Israel glitz and hasbara that Israeli film artists and Naomi Klein objected to strenuously.

Students at 20 Canadian universities will have the pleasure of dreaming about oral sex in Israel when this tourism campaign comes to a campus near them in the coming weeks. I bet they just can’t wait.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Mossad Chief Remains Holocaust-Obsessed

Sunday, February 21st, 2010

If anyone needs any further proof that the long shadow of the Holocaust continues to inform some of Israel’s most self-destructive behavior, they have only to read this suggestive story in the Times of London providing inside color from supposed Mossad sources about the run-up to the Dubai assassination.  In it, Uzi Machnaimi describes the motivations that inform Meir Dagan, the bloodthirsty Mossad chief responsible for the Dubai fiasco:

The tone of his directorship is set by a photograph on the wall of his modest office in the Tel Aviv headquarters. It shows an old Jew standing on the edge of a trench. An SS officer is aiming his rifle at the old man’s head.“This old Jew was my grandfather,” Dagan tells visitors. The picture reflects in a nutshell his philosophy of Jewish self-defence for survival. “We should be strong, use our brain, and defend ourselves so that the Holocaust will never be repeated,” he once said.

From what I know of the Holocaust era, I find it extremely difficult to believe that anyone would be able to pinpoint a specific picture that showed their grandfather about to be shot by the SS.  So it seems likely to me that Dagan is using the photo as an archetypal Jewish morality lesson: “You see, this is what we are as a people.  This is what we must ensure never happens again.”  But the fact that Dagan is likely making a fraudulent personal claim in order to dramatize the lesson is instructive: after all he is Mossad chief and one of his stock in trades is deception and fraud for a “higher” national purpose.

But even more importantly, this story shows us how the Holocaust continues to infect Israeli consciousness and contributes to pathological behavior.  If we are to believe Dagan and the Times reporter, he killed al-Mabouh because he was little different than that SS officer holding a gun to his “grandfather’s” head.  You see where this leads?  It leads to every enemy Israel has being no different than the Nazi genocidaires.  It leads to many Israeli critics being labelled Kapo (as I have regularly been) or collaborator with Nazis.

We must finally put a stake through the heart of the Holocaust as justifier of Israeli policy.  This historical event should be precisely this and nothing more.  It must not be allowed to become a template for current or future Israeli behavior.  To the extent it does, Israel will never become a normal nation and always live within a nightmare of its own making.

On a related matter, I was shocked to read that Germany reports that, unlike the other European nations whose passports were cloned fraudulently, an Israeli claiming the name Michael Bodenheimer actually did apply for and receive a genuine German passport.  This “Michael Bodenheimer” assumed the name of a real Israeli Orthodox Jew who studies at a yeshiva and seems entirely incapable of espionage.

This part of the story provides a further disgusting abuse of the Holocaust by the Mossad.  Germany allows former German Jews and their descendants to regain German citizenship under humanitarian provisions of its immigration law as a form of compensation to Jews for the suffering they endured.  So what does the Mossad do?  It exploits this to gain a German passport for a future killer.  Why should Germany continue to be so solicitious of German Jews when its largesse is abused by the Mossad?  This is yet another example of Israel cynically exploiting the Holocaust for partisan political gain.  Whoever within the Mossad thought of doing this act should be prosecuted.

The Sunday Mirror also reports that the UK is convinced that the British passports used in the assassination were secretly copied at Ben Gurion airport by Israeli border police:

Diplomatic sources have told the Sunday Mirror they are convinced officials at Tel Aviv’s Ben Gurion Airport took away and copied the passports of six Britons who unwittingly became involved in the assassination plot.

…A senior British diplomatic source revealed: “We believe the innocent British citizens involved had their passports taken away and copied when they were going through the airport.” The disclosure came during debriefs of the Britons who revealed how they had recently had long waits at Ben Gurion while their passports were taken away for checks.

The hit squad did not alter the names and numbers in the passports, but the photographs were switched.

This again goes to the absolute hubris of the Mossad. Did they believe that these Israeli citizens wouldn’t recall such treatment and recount it as soon as the killing was discovered and traced back to them? Did it even care?

There are also reports of future material that may be in the offing from the Dubai police which sounds tantalizing:

The UAE-based al-Bayan newspaper reported Sunday that according to Tamim, Dubai’s police have additional information which has yet to be released, “especially about diplomatic passports used by some of the criminals in order to enter Dubai.”

Bad enough that Mossad abused individuals and their countries by stealing their identities and passports, but to have done so using diplomatic passports, if this is true, ratchets up the drama and offense to any government so victimized.

Ronen Bergman, an Israeli journalist who has literally written the book on the Mossad, has reported quite acutely on the killing in the Wall Street Journal:

…Did Mabhouh constitute an immediate threat? Was eliminating him worth violating international law and risking the ire of so many states…? No country that faces the threat of foreign terrorism on the scale that Israel does can afford to entirely renounce the use of targeted assassinations, despite the ethical and legal problems that such executions raise. But such acts need to be extremely rare. In the case of Israel, such operations require the explicit approval of the prime minister, and they are authorized only after the political risks are carefully weighed. In the case of Dubai, it seems that this did not occur. Either the risks were not explained to Prime Minister Bibi Netanyahu, or he made a serious miscalculation.

Bergman adds an intriguing and tantalizing question which I raised here earlier, that is: given the remarkable achievement on the part of the Dubai police in ferreting out voluminous amounts of documentary evidence of the killing in a very short period of time–could there be another country’s intelligence agency which knew what the Israelis were doing and wanted them to be unmasked?

How did the Dubai police manage all this? Did they have help? For now, it remains a mystery. But in any case, misjudging the ability of the Dubai authorities so spectacularly is evidence of a serious intelligence failure on the part of the organization that sent out the squad.

Here is another tantalizing tidbit from Bergman on the looming transparency of such so-called covert operations in the advanced surveillance age in which we live:

…This past week was the end of an era in undercover operations: It is no longer possible to carry out assassinations without leaving a trace. The Dubai hit squad chose to carry out their mission in a hotel room, no doubt because they believed the setting provided them with the greatest degree of protection. But technology has turned hotels into centers of electronic surveillance, and it is safe to assume that in the future terrorists will regard the comfort of top-of-the-line hotels as safe havens.

In addition to closed circuit TV systems and the ability to track cellphone and computer users, advanced biometric identification systems and online coordination across borders are becoming more and more widespread. Soon it will be much easier to identify and detain suspects in public places such as airports in real time. The technology isn’t quite there yet, but it is close…

These advancements should be welcomed; they make the war on terror a lot more efficient. The problem is that the same technological tools we use to thwart terrorists can also be used against the people whose job it is to stop them.

Of course, what is missing here is Bergman’s sensitivity to the fact that some of those whose job it may be to stop terrorists adopt the latters’ tactics and so become terrorists themselves, albeit of the state variety.  Hard as it may be for Bergman to believe, it may actually be a good thing to prevent all people, including intelligence agencies from engaging in assassinations.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Haaretz’s Burston: Pain of the Liberal Zionist

Saturday, February 20th, 2010

Brad Burston's Zionist crisis of conscience (Jews for Justice for Palestinians)

I empathize with Brad Burston.  I feel his pain.  The current rightist government is driving him to despair as a liberal Zionist.  It is destroying his dream of an Israel that is good and moral and at peace with itself and its neighbors.  I think I have long since lost some of the hopes and dreams Burston had (though my pain at times is no less than Burston’s).  I still consider myself a Zionist, but I would guess that our conceptions of it would be different.

Which is the reason why Burston’s dilemma compels me.  He’s still in territory I left some time ago.  But the very fact that he occupies ground that many Israelis do occupy means he is a bellweather of sorts for the liberal-left Zionist.  If Burston is facing a crisis of conscience, that is an important indication of a chink in the armor of the latter-day Zionism and its liberal supporters.

Avrum Burg went through such a crisis several years ago, abandoned liberal Zionism and Zionism in general, and emigrated from Israel to France and as a result opted out, to an extent, of this political debate.  It will be interesting to see whether, like Burg, Burston will have the courage of his conviction, and whether he will move to a more radical position or remain in his liberal Zionist mode.

Since he’s such a powerful writer when his passion is engaged, I enjoy quoting him at length.  Before I do though, I’m troubled by his juxtaposition of the supposed far-left anti-Zionist position with his own.  There are anti-Zionist who truly hate Israel, but there are anti-Zionists who do not and they’re not treated fairly by Burston’s formulation.  With that caveat, read on:

At times like these, I envy the people who passionately, frankly, with all their hearts, despise Israel.

Hate Israel enough, and the Jewish state’s failings and blunders, its self-satisfied blindness and its resultant self-destructive policies, cause not pain, but delight.

Hate Israel enough, and you’re spared all inclination to try to fix what’s wrong, to work to set it right. On the contrary, hate Israel enough, and you may come to believe not only that the country deserves to be punished to the point of replacement by a different state – Israel may well do the job all by itself.

This is one of those times.

I have made my peace with the fact that this is not the same country I moved to, so long ago. I learned when I first came, that Israel was not the country I’d thought I was moving to.

But this is different. This time is a test for every Israeli, and so far, we are failing.

There was once a time when Israel longed to be a member in good standing of the community of nations. There was a time when one of its fondest goals was to end its status as a nation in quarantine, boycotted, unrecognized, unwanted, kept firmly at arm’s length.

No longer. Without asking its people, without a second thought, Israel, at its highest level, has taken an executive decision. Unable to beat the forces who want to see Israel as one of the world’s primary pariah states, it has resolved to join them.

Determined to take our fate into its own hands. Israel, at its highest level, has decided that the job of delegitimizing the Jewish state must not be left to foreigners and amateurs. Showing itself desperate to be a pariah state, Israel will now get it done on its own.

What the far-left from Britain to Berkeley has been unable to bring off – a sense among Israel’s allies that Israel has become a heartless, morally heedless aggressor state worthy of sanction and shunning – the far-right in Israel’s own government, and in particular, its Foreign Ministry, seems determined to inculcate to the full.

We should have known that something like the Dubai assassination debacle was going to happen. The process of de-legitimizing Israel from within was going too slowly.

It was not enough choose a pathetic side issue, a Turkish television show with anti-Israel scenes, as grounds to humiliate with infantile malice the highly respected ambassador of Turkey – a nation whose relationship with Israel, though troubled, remains crucial from every strategic and diplomatic standpoint…

Referring to the bellicose, confessed and convicted disgrace who is his foreign minister and superior, Ayalon told Channel Two, “His policy is proving to be effective. We will not allow a situation where every country will kick us. If there will be an attack [even if verbal or cultural] on Israel, we will leave all options open, including the expulsion of ambassadors.

It wasn’t enough to threaten our relations with the United Kingdom, Ireland, France, Austria and the whole of the European Union, as well as the emirates and other moderate Muslim states, by apparently violating the basic conventions of all civilized states in the Dubai murder.

It was necessary to stage a quick follow-up, for the sake of balance, perhaps, in going after our relations with Israel’s indispensable ally. In a gratuitous move breathtaking in its haughtiness, its ignorance of and disrespect for the United States and the American Jewish community, the Foreign Ministry – spearhead of Israel’s campaign against boycotts abroad – elected this week to boycott a meeting with five U.S. Congressmen visiting Israel.

Why? The representatives were visiting under the auspices of J Street. J Street, in the ministry’s eyes, is guilty of the crime of explicitly calling itself pro-Israel, while not agreeing wholeheartedly with everything the government of Israel says and does.

I have come to envy the people who hate Israel. They’ve got every reason to smile.

…No one can defend this anymore. There’s too much that looks bad, and much too much of it is true.

Like so many of Israel’s recent actions, the motives for the Dubai assassination are debatable. The negative impact is inarguable.

…My wife, who cares about this country as deeply as anyone, was singing this morning, but with a smile I have come to recognize as a sign of pain. ” … And they call the state Pariah.”

All those years of isolation, of quarantine, are coming home to haunt us. Now it turns out that the contempt for the rest of the world that it bred in Israeli Jews, extended to contempt for immigrant Jews as well.

The response of many Israelis to what appears to be officially sanctioned theft, exploitation, and ruin of the identities of immigrants to Israel, was terrifying in its good humor, with morning talk-show hosts making fun of their Hebrew, even as they made light of their plight.

…This is what I have learned about the government of this place, and many of the voters who put it there. Intelligent people who are too smart to be able to see themselves clearly, render themselves stupid.

And countries which cannot bear to look, even if they have good reasons, render themselves dangerous – first of all, to themselves.

This is not the country I first came to. But I still care about it, even if I know it may care much less than I would like, about me.

I have come to envy the people who hate Israel, because they cannot feel the tragedy in the phenomenal possibility, the depth and breadth of humanity that is going to waste here…

There is so much right about this analysis and it is so heartfelt and powerful that it is hard to find fault with it.  If I would criticize Burston’s position at all, he places the blame for his disillusion almost wholly on the current Likudist government. He’ll find no disagreement from me on that.  However, by implication he seems to be saying that a different Israeli government with a different set of parties in power might do better or differently.  I find this highly doubtful.  With the current set of parties and leaders, none have the capacity to lead Israel out of the wasteland in which it finds itself.

This nation is hopelessly lost in the wilderness like the Israelites led by Moses who wandered for forty years till they entered the land of Israel.  Latter-day Israel too has wandered for more than 40 years in the wilderness of Occupation.  They have no leader of the quality of Moses to lead them out of oblivion.  There is no Israeli de Klerk  (or Palestinian Mandela for that matter).  That is why I have come to despair of the ability of Israel unaided to correct its errors and put itself on the right track.  If this conflict is ever to be resolved it will only come from the forceful intervention of outside forces like the U.S., EU, UN and/or NATO.

I wish Brad Burston well and hope he will follow the logic of his own despair to some other place than the Sinai of liberal Zionism.  It will be a hard, painful journey.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
Performance Optimization WordPress Plugins by W3 EDGE