Mahzor

New York Public Library

Churches

Sarajevo Haggadah

Mah Nishtanah

Sarajevo haggadah

Antaea Darom

Israeli women's art

Action

Torah as music

Ben Heine

Action

ceramic bowl

Mohammad Said Kalash, "Offering Reconciliation" exhibit (photo: Ilan Amihai)

Action

Punch and Judy/Pinchas and Jamila

Avi Katz

Action

David Grossman

Ben Heine

Action

Eldrige Street shul

Lower East Side

Action

Dove

Ben Heine

Action

Two birds

Hoda Jamal

Action

Israeli and Palestinian boys

from documentary, Promises

Action

Cat in the Hat

Yiddish version

Action

Daylight through the Wall

Banksy: graffiti art on Separation Wall

Action

Maurice Sendak's Brundibar set

New Victory Theater (photo: Nan Melville/NYT)

Action

Daniel Barenboim, West-Eastern Divan Orchestra

Palestinian-Israeli musical ensemble (photo: Kerstin Joensson/AP)

Action

Great Day on Eldrige Street

N.Y.'s klezmer greats celebrate shul rededication (photo: Leo Sorel)

Action

Joint Appeal for Peace

(Avi Katz)

Joint Appeal for Peace

Ketubah, Ancona, Italy (1772)

(Jewish Theological Seminary library)

Ancona ketubah

Archive for February, 2010

The Schadenfreude of the Israeli Right

Sunday, February 28th, 2010

For the sake of my honor, I’ve got to explain a real boneheaded set of errors that happened last night, which happened to also be Purim.  This holiday is the equivalent of April Fool’s and it’s common to read wild newspaper stories attempting to take in the reader in a good natured way.  Of course, I was silly not to realize that Haaretz wrote just such a story claiming the Israeli government was planning to beam high tech ads onto the stones of the Kotel (Western Wall).  I got halfway through writing a post criticizing this plan when I realized the article was a Purim joke.  And a very funny one that took me in for the few minutes it took me to get halfway through writing the post.

I hadn’t published the post yet, so I saved it as a Draft.  For some strange reason insted of deleting the post (that’ll teach me) I decided to make some formatting changes and after one of those changes instead of hitting Save Draft out of habit I clicked on the Publish button.  I immediately realized my error and changed the status of the post from Published to Draft, but I didn’t realize that I needed to click another button, Update, in order to change the post back from Published to Draft.  So unbeknownst to me the post was still sitting out there for all of the pro-Israel right-wing to see, and call me a fool.

But what I thought was most interesting was the level of schadenfreude within the Israeli right especially toward people like me who are perceived as goring their ox (Israel).  It’s something I had every right to expect from the error I made.  But the intensity of the viciousness of the comments was a good stiff wind of opprobrium.  Every so often I publish a post with selective comments just to remind my readers of the quality of the criticism coming from the other side in this debate.  So here is a sampling:

Mate are you retarded?…People should be forced to take an intelligence test to be able to write a blog.

I knew you were misguided, but not this utterly stupid.

Oh my it hurts.  hh richard, reading your blog all this time was worth it just to see you being made by a purim joke.. oh it hurts, make the laughter stop…

i guess your hate for my country is such, and your knowledge of what you claim is your heritage is such that the joke went over your head.

This comment was left today in the thread for the post about the Israeli Orthodox rabbi who engaged in improprieties with young boys in his charge:

…Given your long track record of transvestitism and of groping little boys in the playground, don’t you think you are being a bit hypocritical…

It’s hard to take the above comment in anything other than a very personal way, but I try to see it clinically in the context of a clear obsession that the Israeli far-right has with scatology, pornography, homosexuality and other forms of deviancy (in their eyes or course).  I wrote a post about this that deserves wider circulation.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

From Polish Skinhead to Orthodox Jew

Sunday, February 28th, 2010

As if this story isn’t far-fetched enough.  I first read this paragraph in a NY Times profile of Pawel, a former Polish skinhead turned Orthodox Jew:

Pawel’s metamorphosis from baptized Catholic skinhead to Jew began in a bleak neighborhood of concrete tower blocks in Warsaw in the 1980s, where Pawel said he and his friends reacted to the gnawing uniformity of socialism by embracing anti-Semitism. They shaved their heads, carried knives and greeted one another with the raised right arm gesture of the Nazi salute.

And then the closing paragraph of the story, which indicates that the reporter and perhaps Pawel himself, have a sense of humor–dark, perhaps, and definitely Jewish, but a sense of humor nevertheless:

…Now he is studying to become a shochet, a person charged with killing animals according to Jewish dietary laws. “I am good with knives,” he explained.

Let it not be said that the Times doesn’t have a sense of humor.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Canadian Council for Israel-Jewish Advocacy Website Disappears

Sunday, February 28th, 2010

One of my trusty reader-researchers discovered a curious fact today.  CIJA, the funder of pro-Israel Canadian student groups and the execrable Size Doesn’t Matter Video tourism promotion (that spices up the mix with intimations of oral sex) has disappeared from the web.  Just…like…that.  Vanished.  Here is what the website used to look like according to the Wayback Machine.  For the U.S., it would be something like if the Aipac or AJC website was there one minute and gone the next.  What happened?

I’m going to ask my trusty Canadian readers (I hope I have a few) to let me know what they hear or read on this subject.  Are they revamping the website?  Did the Israeli/Canadian Jewish powers that be get so embarrassed by this piece of weirdness they decided the entire organization needed to go?  Though I’m tempted to think there’s something to this, I wonder why the Size Doesn’t Matter website is still there in all its glory?  Unless of course, SDM is independent enough of CIJA that it can remain while CIJA goes kaput.  Or is it something as simple as a staff member didn’t pay the web host or domain registrar?

Whatever the reason, something is not right in the world of Canada’s Israel lobby.  Here’s another reason why: when the Jerusalem Post, one of the most right-wing of Israel’s dailies, publishes a column criticizing the video, you know you’re in trouble.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Hot Purim Costumes This Year: Gail Folliard, or Tennis Anyone?

Saturday, February 27th, 2010
Gail folliard

Gail Folliard: perfect Purim costume

Dubai assassin: before (bald) and after (glasses, wig, and fake moustache)

Tonight was Purim, a joyous Jewish holiday (at the expense of Haman and his family who were bloodthirstily massacred) on which children and adults dress in costumes and have a grand old time. At our synagogue there were the standard costumes of Mordechai, Queen Esther and King Ahaseureus. There were even a few daring Vashtis, the queen Ahaseureus dumps for Esther when the former refuses to “entertain” his guests with dancing and God knows what else.

But this costumery shows a distinct lack of imagination: where are the future Mossad agents?  Where are the Gail Folliard costumes? The fat, middle-aged tennis players? Where are the business men disguised with glasses and fake moustache as revealed by Dubai’s CCTV system? C’mon my fellow Jews. We have to show our sense of good fun and good sport by honoring those brave Mossad agents who rid the world of another enemy of Israel and the Jewish people.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Dubai Has DNA, Fingerprint Evidence of Dubai Assassins; Israeli-American Finance Company Provided Killers’ Credit Cards

Friday, February 26th, 2010

Several interesting developments in the Dubai assassination investigation.  Al Arabiya reports that police authorities in Dubai claim that they have both DNA and fingerprint evidence providing 100% certainty of the identity of at least one of the killers.  The report doesn’t make clear precisely what this means: does it know the real identity?  Or does it have usable evidence which it can use to find the real killer?  Even if the latter is the case, Dubai can now make a case for demanding DNA swabs from the Mossad to verify that its agents were not the killers.  Israel of course will refuse.


Yuval Tal Interview


Clayton Swisher writes a strong post arguing the case for U.S. involvement in the investigation as financial dealings here enabled the killing.  Turns out, a former officer in an elite IDF unit runs a financial services firm, Payoneer, in the U.S. and he arranged for the credit cards used fraudulently by the killers.

Payoneer also has a research and development centre based in Tel Aviv.   (I find it mildly amusing that Payoneer is pimped out on the Birthright Israel website).

I also find the Payoneer connection interesting given that its CEO is Yuval Tal, a former Israeli special forces commando. Mr Tal did not exactly conceal his prior affiliations when he appeared on Fox News during the 2006 Lebanon war. He opined then that “this is a war that Israel cannot afford to lose”.

If Tal or his Payoneer firm are in any way involved in the conspiracy to help a foreign intelligence service (like, say providing Mossad operatives with credit cards), he may soon find himself in his own battle with little prospects of winning – in a US courtroom.

The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) is the lead agency with statutory authority and responsibilities for investigating foreign espionage activities on US soil.  It’s a job they take seriously and with a proven record of not shying away from the numerous instances when America’s special ally played foul.

Swisher suggests grounds for the investigation and how it might proceed:

As an initial inquiry, I imagine case agents will subpoena all financial records associated with the fraudulently issued credit cards. This would include the original credit card applications, which requires such things as a delivery address (to mail the card to), social security numbers, dates of birth, and employment information.

If the applications were made on paper, then the documents may contain all manner of evidence, from handwriting samples to fingerprints. There will be a similar trail to pore over if the applications were made over the phone or electronically via computer.

I also smell money laundering, as the money was supposedly dumped into prepaid accounts to conceal its purpose and origination. So US investigators may even want to tap in on the US treasury department’s crack financial investigator, Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FINCEN).

Then Swisher asks the $64,000 Question:

It’s not clear if the FBI is silently participating or if its officials are fence-sitting.

If it’s the latter, then they may want to consider the following:  if a foreign national was murdered on US soil with the help of credit cards issued in the Emirates, what sort of co-operation would they demand?

If you watch the video featuring Tal explaining his product you realize that the cards he offered would’ve been perfect for the Mossad since they were pre-paid and presumably would decrease the amount of complications for them in travel by their agents from country to country.  Even more strangely, Tal boasts that the cards are perfect for “publishers” or companies which have advertising affiliates since the cards can be “branded” and every affiliate or employee can have a card with the company’s logo emblazoned on it.  Why not have a Mossad corporate credit card courtesy of Payoneer?  Where is a good political cartoonist when I need one?  To help you along, here’s the Mossad logo: get to work!

There has been a deafening silence in the U.S. media on this subject.  It may not be a coincidence that Swisher published his post at Al Jazeera English.  Aside from reporting a U.S. connection, I’m not aware of any media outlet which has quoted any analyst or expert suggesting that the FBI get to work and do its job; or that the Justice Department and Obama administration demand that our financial system not be exploited on behalf of Israeli state terrorism.

UPDATE: I just discovered this new report in the Wall Street Journal which raises this tantalizing prospect:

Part of the focus of the probe, the person familiar with the situation said, is to determine whether the cards were issued and used in this way, and if so, where the funds that would have been funneled into the cards originated.

Realizing of course that Mossad will have done its best to conceal the origin of these funds, I wonder whether the FBI and Dubai will have any success tracing them.

Also surprising is this judgment by the Wall Street Journal reporter:

Israel’s international standing has suffered. As the uproar over fraudulent passports grows, some analysts are starting to question whether Israel, if it was involved, made a strategic blunder despite a tactical victory.

When a markedly pro-Israel paper like WSJ starts raising such doubts, you know the Mossad’s in trouble.

Haaretz reports the strange news that the Mossad apparently photoshopped the passport photos of the agents:

…A Haaretz probe discovered that the passport photographs of the agents who assassinated Mahmoud al-Mabhouh in Dubai were doctored so the agents would not be identified.

The discovery casts doubt on claims that the espionage agency that carried out last month’s hit on the senior Hamas operative committed grave errors.

Various features of the people in the photographs, such as eye color or the line of a lip, were changed – slightly enough so as not arouse suspicion at passport control, but still enough that the real agent could not be recognized.

I find this report, written by Haaretz’s military correspondent (and someone likely to have Mossad sources and a vested interest in showcasing them), dubious in some ways.  How do they know the photos would entirely prevent you from identifying the original killer?  On what basis can they make that statement?  I don’t see how altering the line of a lip or eye color would render positive identification impossible.  And I wonder if you can discover an image was photoshopped whether you can also reconstitute the original image by stripping away the layers of photo editing.

The second sentence of the passage is typical knee-jerk Mossad apologetics, which is why I noted the possibility of the Mossad fighting back in this story against the almost universal disparagement it has suffered in the world media.  For example, I find it odd that Avi Issacharoff would say that a Haaretz “probe” discovered the photoshopping.  What kind of probe?  What made him think to mount such a probe?  What was the nature of the photo alternation?  How was it done?  All questions unanswered by this story.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Settler Rabbi Stonewalls on Sex Abuse Charge

Friday, February 26th, 2010

Rabbi Mordechai Elon, accused of sexual abuse

Yet another prominent Orthodox rabbi has been charged with sexual abuse. This time it is Rabbi Mordechai Elon, one of the foremost rabbinic leaders of the Israeli Orthodox movement and former rosh yeshiva at the flagship Yeshivat HaRav, where last year a Palestinian mounted an assault which left several students dead. The result was that students of the yeshiva and other far right Jews went on a rampage and tried to burn down the home of the family of the perpetrator of the attack. Elon’s brother is Benny, a former MK for a far-right pro-settler party.

At one time the rabbi was so renowned he’d hoped to be named chief rabbi. Alas, that hope is all but dashed as he was charged several years ago with abusing boys at his yeshiva:

Takana, a rabbinic forum established in 2003 to clamp down on sexual misconduct by Orthodox educators, went public February 15 with allegations that Mordechai “Moti” Elon had taken advantage of his influence over male students and performed “acts at odds with sacred and moral values.”

The panel later said that two people, whose complaints alleged acts from about 25 years ago, had been under 18 at the time. More recent alleged acts involved students of Elon who were 18 or older. Since its initial disclosure, the panel reports having received one more complaint of an alleged underage encounter…

What is unusual about this case is that a splinter group of the Orthodox community is taking the position that the entire prosecution is an attempt to destroy rabbinic authority and the Orthodox movement. It calls for refusal to cooperate with state authorities (or to deal with the charge through a beyt din).

Rabbi Shlomo Aviner, leading Orthodox authority on child sex abuse, himself charged with offense

One of the leaders of this group is Rabbi Shalom Aviner, rosh yeshiva of Ateret Cohanim, one of the most extreme of Israeli yeshivot. It is preparing the religious and priestly rite for establishment of the Third Temple, a development which could cause a holy war if the point is pressed too intensely. Aviner is known as an enthusiastic supporter of extremist settler politics, having called Jewish terrorist Baruch Goldstein “a saint.” He declared that anti-Occupation Israelis who refuse army service should be executed.  He called settlement evacuation a ‘illegal crime.’  Ironically (when you read what I’m about to tell you), Aviner has also suggested that women would be justified in killing a man who is raping them.  No word though on how they would do so unless he plans to provide them a weapon during the assault.  This advice shows the rabbi’s complete ignorance of the circumstances of most rapes:

“In either word or deed, fight him off. Yell out loud so that everyone can hear you. If he touches you, slap him. If he attempts to do worse, and there is no other choice, you can kill him…yes, kill him,” Rabbi Aviner wrote.

In many cases, such resistance might lead to the victim’s death or severe beating.  One shudders to think what the rabbi would think of a woman who did not resist out of such fear.

Rabbi Aviner also calls for all Orthodox Jews to report any sexual abuse, which at first glance is quite an advance over the traditional approach, which has been to hush such charges up and avoid them like the plague.  But in light of what I’m about to tell you you’ll find it odd that he suggests one enormous loophole:

“If the beater or the abuser is aware of his problem and is willing to receive the proper therapy, and in addition meets his commitment and goes to therapy, and is supervised by responsible elements, only in such a case there is no need to report…

So, all the abuser must do to avoid civil punishment is go to therapy.  You’ll note there is no mention by Rabbi Aviner of the necessity of the abuser refraining from abusing once he is in therapy.  The reason why this distinction is important is that Aviner has become the leading defender of the non-cooperation movement regarding the Elon case:

“I am telling everybody — keep silent,” the head of Jerusalem’s Ateret Cohanim Yeshiva, Rabbi Shlomo Aviner, told the Forward. He said that the affair must not be allowed to undermine the rabbis’ authority.

No word on how Aviner squares this approach with his earlier pronouncement urging reporting abuse to civil authorities.  Apparently, Elon’s agreement to pursue counseling convinced Aviner that reporting him was a sin.  But the Takanah rabbis disagreed strongly:

The[y] were very clear about why they chose to make the sexual-abuse allegations public now, several years after they themselves were made aware of them. When they were first informed about the charges, the rabbis said, they tried unsuccessfully to persuade the complainants to go to the police. In 2006, they also approached the attorney general at the time, Menachem Mazuz, who felt unable to probe the matter without the complainants’ cooperation. The current attorney general, Yehuda Weinstein, has now told police to look into the allegations.

Stymied on the law-enforcement front, Takana rabbis said they demanded in 2006 that Elon cease face-to-face teaching, counseling and other rabbinic activities; he agreed. That year, he retired from his post at Yeshivat HaKotel and moved to the Galilee. But the forum rabbis say that Elon failed to honor his commitment, leaving them, according to a statement they released, with “no other way to protect the public from possible future harm” than by going public. The final straw was that the forum believed he had resumed counseling young men on sexual matters.

This points out the weakness of the Takana Forum.  It is entirely voluntary with the only threat or sanction the rabbis can use being public exposure.  Rabbi Elon has exposed this weakness and Rabbi Aviner is further undermining it.  What he doesn’t realize is that he is harming Israeli Orthodox Judaism far more by endorsing impunity than a civil prosecution of Elon would.

Why might Aviner take such a position?  Well, it turns out he’s likely to have his own sexual skeletons rattling in his closet.  Several websites whose goal is to track and report Jewish sexual abuse report Aviner himself has been accused of improprities with women he has counseled:

Back in 2002, serious allegations were made against Rabbi Shlomo Aviner of sexually harassing women both verbally and physically.

…In 2005, two women accused the Aviner of creating emotionally intimate relationships with them. These relationships included his expressions of his love for them during regular late-night phone conversations, extracting details from them of their sexuality and promoting an unhealthy emotional dependence on him.

Like in many other cases, those who tried to speak out where shunned and made to look as if they were crazy.

One wonders what the good rabbi would say if he sexually abused the women, would they have the right to kill him?  You can see how insane the situation is.

What’s “crazy” is a religious community that bestows any respect on one of its leaders accused of the very crimes about which he makes moral pronouncements.  Only in such an insular environment can such a person not be viewed as hopelessly self-interested and suffering from an insurmountable conflict.

Not to mention that Aviner should be an embarrassment to his allies in the settler extremist movement.  Yes, the man is innocent till proven guilty.  But does that mean he needs to placed on a pedestal and his views about Baruch Goldstein or sexual abuse need to be honored as if they were halacha l’Moshe mi’Sinai (“the law according to Moses on Sinai”)?

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Meir Dagan, Mossad Chief, Sensitive Guy

Thursday, February 25th, 2010

H/t to Angry Arab for noting this screamingly dissonant passage in a profile of Mossad chief, Meir Dagan in Dubai’s The National:

His ruthless reputation is at odds with his personal demeanour. In private time he likes to listen to classical music, or drive his Jeep to commune with nature, sucking contemplatively on his pipe.

He is a vegetarian, a predilection Dagan concedes some might find surprising given his battlefield reputation.

Can you imagine this buzzard sitting in the lotus position doing yoga to “wind down” from the pressures of a stressful job?  I can almost imagine him driving those winding roads up the Golan to Har Harmon the wind blowing through his hair (oops, I think he’s bald!).  Nature awaits at the end of his journey.

The part about being a vegetarian is a scream.  I’d have thought he’d want to consume part of al-Mabouh’s body in the way that cannibals eat their rivals to assume their power.  Sorry for being so ghoulish, but how can’t you be given what the Mossad has been up to lately?

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Martin Kramer, Genocidaire

Thursday, February 25th, 2010

For those who followed my posts about Martin Kramer’s extraordinary talk (watch video) at the Herzliya conference, in which he claimed that overpopulation fueled Islamic radicalism and that the way to control Palestinian terror was through putting Gaza on a “diet” that discouraged having children–I’ve shied away until now from calling this statement genocide (though Ali Abunimah and M.J. Rosenberg have done so).

Here is what Kramer said in part:

Aging populations reject radical agendas, and the Middle East is no different. Now eventually, this will happen among the Palestinians too, but it will happen faster if the West stops providing pro-natal subsidies for Palestinians with refugee status. Those subsidies are one reason why, in the ten years from 1997 to 2007, Gaza’s population grew by an astonishing 40 percent. At that rate, Gaza’s population will double by 2030, to three million. Israel’s present sanctions on Gaza have a political aim undermine the Hamas regime but if they also break Gaza’s runaway population growth and there is some evidence that they have that might begin to crack the culture of martyrdom which demands a constant supply of superfluous young men. That is rising to the real challenge of radical indoctrination, and treating it at its root.

But I was entirely convinced by this definition of the term offered by M.J. in the Geneva Convention:

The Convention on Genocide bans “bans killing of members of any racial, ethnic, national or religious group because of their membership in that group, causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group, inflicting on members of the group conditions of life intended to destroy them, imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group, and taking group members’ children away from them and giving them to members of another group.”

And it is that – withholding aid to prevent births within the group – that Kramer advocates. He even calls the birth of Palestinian babies “extreme demographic armament.”

Cutting off food (Kramer uses the disguised term “pro-natal subsidy”) and other essential humanitarian aid from Gaza in order to lower the brith rate, fits this definition.  So Kramer is without doubt a genocidaire.  Congratulations, Harvard, you’ve got a genuine advocate of ethnic genocide on your faculty.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
Performance Optimization WordPress Plugins by W3 EDGE