Mahzor

New York Public Library

Churches

Sarajevo Haggadah

Mah Nishtanah

Sarajevo haggadah

Antaea Darom

Israeli women's art

Action

Torah as music

Ben Heine

Action

ceramic bowl

Mohammad Said Kalash, "Offering Reconciliation" exhibit (photo: Ilan Amihai)

Action

Punch and Judy/Pinchas and Jamila

Avi Katz

Action

David Grossman

Ben Heine

Action

Eldrige Street shul

Lower East Side

Action

Dove

Ben Heine

Action

Two birds

Hoda Jamal

Action

Israeli and Palestinian boys

from documentary, Promises

Action

Cat in the Hat

Yiddish version

Action

Daylight through the Wall

Banksy: graffiti art on Separation Wall

Action

Maurice Sendak's Brundibar set

New Victory Theater (photo: Nan Melville/NYT)

Action

Daniel Barenboim, West-Eastern Divan Orchestra

Palestinian-Israeli musical ensemble (photo: Kerstin Joensson/AP)

Action

Great Day on Eldrige Street

N.Y.'s klezmer greats celebrate shul rededication (photo: Leo Sorel)

Action

Joint Appeal for Peace

(Avi Katz)

Joint Appeal for Peace

Ketubah, Ancona, Italy (1772)

(Jewish Theological Seminary library)

Ancona ketubah

Archive for January, 2010

Shin Bet Seeks Expulsion of American-Jewish Journalist Working for Palestinian News Agency

Friday, January 15th, 2010

Jared Malsin, American-Jewish journalist in Palestine threatened with expulsion (BBC)

The Only Democracy in the Middle East™ has struck again: the English editor for the independent Palestinian news agency Maan, American Jared Malsin, was detained along with his girlfriend at Ben Gurion airport on his return to Israel from a European vacation.  During the detention it became clear that the Shin Bet intended to expel him from Israel as a security risk.  It provided no justification whatsoever.  And when Malsin notified the U.S. embassy of his predicament and they called to inquire, security officials lied by claiming neither individual was in custody and that they were probably “enjoying a night on the town in Tel Aviv” and had simply forgotten to notify them.

Look, I understand this is garden variety harassment when it comes to Israel.  Palestinians are treated far worse.  Indeed, three Gaza journalists were killed during Cast Lead, one by an Israeli tank shell fired despite the victim being clearly marked as a journalist.  But what stands out here is the sheer effrontery of Israel’s Interior Ministry expelling a U.S. citizen and journalist from its shores merely for reporting inconvenient facts about Israel’s maintenance of the Occupation.  The security establishment doesn’t shrink from tangling with Israel’s most important ally nor from violating one of the most treasured traditions of western democracies: freedom of the press.

Maan quickly filed an injunction staying the expulsion order and the Israeli attorney general filed for the court to remove the stay.  Luckily, the Israeli district judge refused to lift the stay and Malsin will live to fight another day, but barely.  Unless there is a furious outcry both from inside and outside Israel chances are a judicial system inherently biased in favor of state power when it comes to security issues will likely acquiesce with the decision to expel the journalist.

Since he was arrested Tuesday, Malsin has been allowed only one 20 minute meeting with his lawyer and permitted contact with a single U.S. consular official.  His personal belongings have been put in herem and he is not allowed access to them (when Malsin first boarded the flight back to Israel in Prague, security agents confiscated his cell phone so he could not inform his employer or U.S. diplomats of his situation).

Lying scumbag PR flack Mark Regev labelled as “absurd” claims that the action comes in retaliation for Maan’s coverage of rather unpleasant events like the weekly Bilin anti-Wall protests at which several Palestinians and an American have been murdered or maimed with severe brain injuries.  But Israeli immigration officials seem not to have been on the same page:

…The official explanation offered by the country’s own immigration department cited news stories Malsin had authored “inside the Territories,” among them some which “criticized the State of Israel.”

The Interior Ministry makes the vague claim he was detained because he was ‘uncooperative’ during questioning:

An official report on the questioning, which Maan said it had received from the court, accused Mr Malsin of failing to arrange the correct visa, but did not give details.

It said he was suspected of “exploiting the fact that he is Jewish to gain a visa”.  This was apparently on the basis that, when seeking a visa extension previously, he had told Interior Ministry officials he was exploring the option of emigrating to Israel, but had written articles critical of the country.  By law Jews from around the world are eligible to emigrate to Israel.

The report also said Mr Malsin had refused to give the name of the friend he said he lived with in the West Bank.

This might have made Israeli officials even angrier:

…Mr Malsin, a graduate of Yale University, had initially come to Israel on the Birthright programme, which funds visits to Israel for young Jewish Americans.

Mr Malsin had never overstayed a visa, except for his most recent one, which was a few days overdue and that he had been told by officials this did not matter, Mr Hale said.

Whoa, biting the hand that feeds, Mr. Malsin.  You’re only allowed to come on a Birthright tour if you expect to make aliyah or return to the States to make Jewish-Zionist babies.  It’s simply bad form to take the free trip AND exploit the Law of Return in order to write nasty articles about Israel.  If he had only gone to work for Israel HaYom, he would’ve been welcomed with a ticker tape parade and given the keys to the kingdom or a settlement or two.

Maan even reports that some Israeli officials have expressed concern and opposition to the violation of press freedoms.

Several major press freedom NGOs have expressed support for Malsin:

The New York-based Committee to Protect Journalists, which monitors freedom of the press worldwide, urged Israel to refrain from taking punitive action against reporters over specific content in their work. “Israel cannot hide behind the pretext of security to sideline journalists who have done nothing more than maintain an editorial line that the authorities dislike,” the organization said.

The 2009 Reporters Without Borders Press Freedom Index ranks Israel 93rd (out of 175) behind other Middle Eastern countries like Kuwait, Lebanon and United Arab Emirates.  Press freedom in the Israeli Occupied Territories is ranked 150th.  Now we see a perfect example of why.

Malsin’s girlfriend, a Lutheran peace activist, has already been deported by Israel.  She, alas, was not a journalist and had no protections from Israel’s wrath.  And Israel didn’t even have to explain what sort of security risk she posed as a Christian adherent of non-violence.

H/t to Rupa Shah.

Kahane Grandson Arrested in Torching of Yasuf Mosque

Thursday, January 14th, 2010

Arutz Sheva, the settler’s news portal, reveals that Meir Kahane’s grandson, Meir David Kahane (which was also his grandfather’s full name), 17, was arrested and is a suspect in the arson attack on a West Bank mosque in the village of Yasuf.  The latter neighbors the radical Israeli settlement of Kfar Tapuach, where the young Kahane lives.  Both his grandfather and parents were murdered by Arab militants in separate incidents.

The Israeli police refused to name the suspect, though the Jerusalem Post identified him as a Kahane “relative.”  But Arutz Sheva seems less bound by such pledges of privacy and revealed the boy’s identity.

I should also remind readers that this is the same Kfar Tapuach where Kahane-wannabe Jewish terrorist, Ephraim Khantsis, was hanging out for the past four months telling anyone within earshot that Jack Teitel, another Israeli-American terrorist on trial for several acts of murder and maiming, was a good Jewish boy and the Palis only got what they deserved, etc., etc.  The IDF recently issued an order expelling Khantsis from the West Bank for six months.

Eden Natan Zenda, another Israeli Jewish terrorist who shot up an Israeli Arab bus and killed four, also lived in Kfar Tapuach after deserting from the IDF.  That place is a regular font of brotherly love.

Can we anticipate even bigger and better acts of hatred from the Kahane clan in the future?  Perhaps graduating from arson to murder to avenge their own parents’ murders?  Where will it all end?

H/t to Eileen Read.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

In Erdogan Game of Chicken, Bibi Blinks First

Wednesday, January 13th, 2010

Israel, as I half expected, has eaten Turkish crow not once, but twice in the past 24 hours for the unpardonable treatment meted out to Turkey’s ambassador at the hands of Israel’s deputy foreign minister, Danny Ayalon.  After the “take him to the woodshed” between Ayalon and the ambassador, Ayalon made a tepid personal apology for his actions.

Turkey promptly announced that an apology from Ayalon was insufficient and that it expected an official government apology, since Turkey viewed the incident as one that reflected on the entire Israel-Turkey relationship.  In fact, it announced it was prepared to recall its ambassador if Israel refused to respond in a satisfactory manner.  The Turkish government had already instructed him to return home Thursday.

Astonishingly, Israel responded that no second apology would be forthcoming.  Until it realized it would be breaking off relations with the only Muslim country in the world that recognized it.  Shimon Peres apparently realized this and got on the phone with Bibi, Yvette, and Ayalon and persuaded the latter to stand down from his refusal.  Otherwise, God only knows what sort of international incident we’d be dealing with now.

The second apology was forthcoming and this appears to have mollified the Turks.  Though if one reads it it is clearly a tissue of lies:

In the letter of official apology, Ayalon wrote that “I had no intention to humiliate you personally and apologize for the way the demarche was handled and perceived.  Please convey this to the Turkish people for whom we have great respect. I hope that both Israel and Turkey will seek diplomatic and courteous channels to convey messages as two allies should,” the letter said.

Can you imagine an idiot who humiliates the national representative of one of the most important nations in the region to have the chutzpah in his alleged apology to call upon Turkey to be courteous in its communications with Israel?  This really is too much even for the dunderheads running the Israeli foreign ministry.

Iranian Physics Professor Assassinated

Wednesday, January 13th, 2010

Masoud Ali Mohammadi, the Iranian opposition's latest martyr

Interpreting the internal machinations of Iranian politics these days is a hazardous occupation.  Today, a noted physics professor in Teheran was murdered by a bomb outside his home:

A remote-controlled bomb attached to a motorcycle killed an Iranian physics professor outside his home in north Tehran on Tuesday, state media reported. The reports blamed the United States and Israel for the attack.

There was no immediate claim of responsibility. One state broadcaster, IRIB, quoted a Foreign Ministry spokesman as saying that “in the initial investigation, signs of the triangle of wickedness by the Zionist regime, America and their hired agents are visible in the terrorist act” against the scientist, Masoud Ali Mohammadi.

The regime’s assignment of blame seemed dubious at best.  First, Mohammadi did not work on Iran’s nuclear program and thus performed no function that could harm Israel’s interests.  Second, the Israelis have shown no capability to perform such a complicated operation inside Iran.  Third, the professor was a former Revolutionary Guard who had turned away from his past years before, and recently signed statements endorsing the Iranian reform movement:

There were some indications that he might have been taking a more active role in the opposition that sprang up after the flawed presidential election last June. Mr. Ali Mohammadi was among 240 university professors who signed a letter before the election expressing support for the main opposition candidate, Mir Hussein Moussavi.

Muhammad Sahimi further explains why Mohammadi might’ve been considered a special thorn in the side of the regime:

According to a statement that was issued by a group of physics students at the University of Tehran, Professor Ali-Mohammadi was one of the leading academics who stormed the University Chancellor’s office to demand an investigation into the June 15 attack on the university when several students were murdered and many more were injured.

Several other students have stated that Professor Ali-Mohammadi had organized debates on the national crisis at the University of Tehran. He had apparently told his students that “they” [the hardliners] had ordered him to put an end to such activities, but that he was going to press on despite their demands. The last of such debates had occurred on January 5, in which he had urged students to come up with a scientific and practical solution to the Iranian crisis. All of his speeches have reportedly been recorded and can be used as evidence to refute the hardliner’s propaganda that he was one of them.

A source in Tehran told the author that Professor Ali-Mohammadi had worked with the Islamic Revolution Guards Corps (IRGC) on several projects in the past. This source said that given Professor Ali-Mohammadi’s extensive knowledge of the IRGC’s activities and his recent new-found support for the reformists and Mousavi would have made him a potential target for the IRGC.

…Because it is likely that Professor Ali-Mohammadi was well informed about many IRGC projects, and a prominent academic supporter of the reformists…his murder would send a message to others, particularly academics. If the hardliners were behind the murder, it would be a signal that they have started a campaign of assassination to silence the opposition.

Another characteristic of the hardliners is that they never forgive anyone who deserts them and joins the opposition. The deserters are usually dealt with much more harshly than bona fide members of the opposition. This only adds to the suspicion that the hardliners may have had something to do with Professor Ali-Mohammadi’s murder.

Prof. Sahimi also describes him among other qualities as supremely kind, which would provide one additional justification for the regime’s hatred.

Another ominous sign of the desperation of the regime is the report that Mehdi Karroubi’s armored car was fired upon by government thugs a few days ago.  This too marks a new escalation in the game of chicken between the government and its opponents.  The regime ratchets up the terror and waits to see the result.  If the outcry is minimal it proceeds to ever more draconian tactics.  The question is how far are they willing to go.  Clearly, they have contemplated arresting the senior leadership.  But would they be willing to kill them outright?  First, you kill a relatively little guy to test the waters, then go after bigger fry.

Lieberman Shames Turkish Ambassador, Torpedoes Israel-Turkish Relations

Wednesday, January 13th, 2010

In most cases, a country’s foreign minister is responsible for furthering his nation’s economic and political interests abroad.  Not in Israel.  In that country, the current foreign minister seems responsible for hectoring any country he deems insufficiently supportive of Israel; and in a few instances like Egypt and Turkey he seems hell-bent on destroying relations altogether.

How else to explain the bizarre performance yesterday by Danny Ayalon, deputy Israeli foreign minister and capo di tutti of Avigdor Lieberman, at which he brusquely summoned the Turkish ambassador for a brushing down, and in a highly unusual move summoned press photographers to record the humiliation and pointedly noted that the ambassador was sitting in a lower position than the Israelis and that the latter refused to shake his hand.  Here is how Yediot reported the story:

When the ambassador was finally asked to enter the room, his hosts instructed him to sit on a low couch opposite the higher chairs in which they were seated. The hosts, Deputy Foreign Minister Danny Ayalon, Foreign Ministry Deputy Director General for Europe, Naor Gilon [ed., and suspected Steven Rosen intelligence conduit], and Ayalon’s office director, David Segal did not smile at their guest and refused to shake his hand.

When the photographers suggested a handshake, the Foreign Ministry officials refused. “That is precisely the issue,” said Ayalon. Ayalon made sure that no one could have any doubts that the humiliation of the ambassador was anything but deliberate: “The important thing is that people see that he’s low and we’re high and that there is one flag here,” he said to the photographers.

This reminds me more of the battle between Freedonia and Sylvania in the Marx Brothers’ Duck Soup, than the behavior of a serious national diplomatic corps:

I have taken it upon myself to make one final effort to prevent war.

- No kidding? – I’ve talked to Ambassador Trentino, and he says Sylvania doesn’t want war either.

…I’ve taken the liberty of asking the ambassador to come over here. Because we both felt that a friendly conference would settle everything peacefully. He’ll be here any moment.

Mrs. Teasdale…I’d be only too happy to meet Ambassador Trentino and offer him on behalf of my country the right hand of good fellowship. And I feel sure he will accept this gesture in the spirit in which it is offered.

But suppose he doesn’t. A fine thing that’ll be. I hold out my hand and he refuses to accept it. That’ll add a lot to my prestige, won’t it? Me, the head of a country, snubbed by a foreign ambassador! Who does he think he is that he can come here and make a sap out of me in front of my people?

Think of it. I hold out my hand and that hyena refuses to accept it. Why, the cheap four-flushing swine! He’ll never get away with it, I tell you! He’ll never get away with it!

…So, you refuse to shake hands with me, eh?

Mrs. Teasdale, this is the last straw! There’s no turning back now!  This means war!

Then it’s war!

israel humiliates turkish ambassador

'The height of humiliation' (Yisrael Hayom)

I wonder whether Bibi Netanyahu, when he appointed Lieberman, realized what he was getting was closer to opera buffa than real diplomacy.  Of course, this performance (which is precisely what it is) brings nothing but ridicule on Israel.  Nations of the world wonder whether the Marx Brothers are running the MFA, instead of professional diplomats.

The Bibi scandal sheet, Yisrael HaYom revels in the political grandstanding with this brazen ‘Height of Humiliation’ photo.

What makes this even more buffoonish is that Lieberman is willing to create this international incident in order to score cheap domestic political points against a rival.  Ehud Barak is scheduled for a major visit to Ankara this weekend.  What better way to screw up the Labor Party leader’s efforts to get Syria-Israel negotiations back on track than to poison the well even before Barak arrives.

I’ve always felt that Israeli politics resembles an alligator wrestling pit more than anything else and this story confirms it.  I’m afraid the analogy to an alligator pit may be doing these noble ancient beasts a disservice.

Turkey’s prime minister however, is a real national leader and no fool.  He’s not playing this as opera and refuses to allow his ambassador to be publicly humiliated. Remember this is the same Erdogan who at Davos dressed down the incipiently senile Shimon Peres when the latter attempted to defend the Gaza war using the most bombastic propaganda.  Now Erdogan is kickin’ butt and takin’ down names:

Turkey demanded an apology from Israel on Tuesday over what it called the discourteous treatment of its ambassador, further souring ties between the two regional powers on the eve of a visit by Israel’s defence minister.

…”We expect an explanation and apologies from Israeli authorities for the attitude against our Tel Aviv ambassador Oguz Celikkol, and the way this attitude was reflected,” the Turkish foreign ministry said in a statement.

“We call on the Israeli Foreign Ministry, whose behaviour and attitude towards our Tel Aviv Ambassador did not comply with diplomacy, to obey courtesy rules,” it said.

The MFA seemed to enjoy the tit for tat and responded with vintage hasbara:

“The Turks are the last people who can preach morality to the State of Israel and the IDF, which is the most moral army in the world.”

UPDATE: Ayalon has “apologized” for his behavior with a statement that typically lacks any crediblity:

…”It is not my way to insult foreign ambassadors and in the future I will clarify my position by more acceptable diplomatic means.”

House Republican: Deport Iranians

Monday, January 11th, 2010

What is it about South Carolina that brings us specimens of humanity like Joe Wilson?

Idiot wind, blowing like a circle around my skull,
From the Grand Coulee Dam to the Capitol.
Idiot wind, blowing every time you move your teeth,
You’re an idiot, babe.
It’s a wonder that you still know how to breathe.

–Bob Dylan, Idiot Wind

What is it about politics in South Carolina?  They send some of the goofiest Republican wingnuts to Congress and do so without any shame or sense of embarrassment. There’s Sen. Jim DeMint, holder of some of the most extreme views in the U.S. senate and ranked by National Journal as the most conservative member of that body. Then there’s dufus Joe Wilson, who had the bad manners to shout out that the president of the United States was a liar during the State of the Union address, a low to which the House has never sunk in Congressional history. The state was also represented in the U.S. senate by Strom Thurmond who, while championing white rights managed to sire a child with his African-American ‘hired help.’  Citizens were so happy with Strom’s representation that they retained him as their senator till he was about 130 years old.  Did they not care that their state was represented by someone who was practically embalmed?

1979/2009 Plus ca change plus la meme choses

And let’s not forget that native son Lothario, Gov. Mark Sanford who decided it would be a great idea before running for president to carry on an affair with an Argentine TV newscaster.  After exposure of his philandering, the Republican-dominated legislature didn’t even think Sanford had done enough wrong to warrant impeachment.  Nevertheless, in a family values state like South Carolina, Sanford’s political goose is cooked.  Which opens the door for yet more wingnut Republicans to enter.

So now we have Congressmember Gresham Barrett proposing, I hope as a campaign stunt, that the U.S. expel all Iranian visa holders from these shores.  The Stop Terrorist Entry Act, would not only prevent any Iranian from entering the country, it would criminalize as terrorist those who are current legal visa holders.

Trita Parsi notes what the U.S. would’ve lost had it implemented Cong. Barrett’s crackerjack legislative proposal years ago as it should have:

…Such important and inspiring figures as Christiane Amanpour, tennis great Andre Agassi, and eBay founder Pierre Omidyar would have never called the United States home, nor would the United States benefit from the innumerable contributions to medicine, engineering, science, and academia that Iranian-Americans made in the last half-century.

One of these, Prof. Muhammad Sahimi keynoted the Iran-Israel conference I organized last month at Town Hall here.  Sahimi is one of the nation’s foremost experts on the Iranian nuclear program and a noted opponent of the current clerical regime.  Besides, if the professor were expelled back to Iran he’d likely be imprisoned by the authorities, who killed one of his brother after the 1979 Revolution because he treated a wounded student organizer opposed to the government.

Congressman Barrett, have you forgotten that one of the premises of this country as espoused by Emma Lazarus in the poem that graces the Statue of Liberty is that we are the Golden Door opening our arms to embrace the oppressed, the enslaved and those who need a home and are seeking liberty because they have lost theirs in their old home?

Many Iranian-Americans came to this country to escape repression at home. We left the country we called home in search of a better, more secure future free from social, political, and religious repression. In the years that have ensued, we have established ourselves and our families in communities across the country and built new connections between Iranians and Americans.

In his attempt to protect America, Barrett adopts tactics that are about as un-American as they come:

Your proposal discriminates against individuals who are in this country legally, based on nothing more than their family’s place of origin. Instead of celebrating the opportunity to inspire a new generation of world leaders and to imbue them with positive feelings toward the United States, your bill would label entire groups of people terrorists based on their nationality and have them summarily deported.It can’t get more un-American than that.

Barrett claims he is introducing his bill in response to the Fort Hood shooting and Detroit terror attack.  But the fact is that no Iranian has been implicated in these incidents and the Iranian regime has never been implicated in any attack on these shores.  Furthermore, his legislation could not have stopped the attacks by the U.S. Army major or Nigerian since it would not have affected them.  Talk about grandstanding for the home crowd.  If this is what it takes to get elected governor of South Carolina it’s a wonder the only people who would want to job are of Barrett’s ilk.

I’m sorry to generalize about South Carolina.  There are probably some wonderful residents like Cong. Jim Clyburn, who championed Barack Obama’s candidacy.  But God, what these fine people are being asked to put up with to have to share a state with ‘em!

Oppose the Barrett punitive legislation by signing the NIAC petition.

Ephraim Khantsis: Portrait of KahanaWannabe American-Jewish Settler Terrorist

Sunday, January 10th, 2010

Ephraim Khantsis, Kahanawanna-be settler terrorist

Haaretz is reporting that an American born-again Orthodox Jew, Ephraim Khantsis, has received a military order expelling him from the West Bank for six months for expressing solidarity with Jack Teitel and his terrorist acts against Palestinians.  Though he was enrolled in the Machon Meir Yeshiva, he spent most of his time since making aliyah to Israel four months ago at the Kfar Tapuach settlement, a hotbed of Kahanist extremism.  It was there that residents reported him.

With some key help from the intrepid Sol Salbe, I’ve learned quite a bit about our Kahane-wannabe.  He recently graduated from SUNY Stony Brook with a degree in computer science.  He grew up in Bensonhurst, known as a tough  neighborhood filled with Syrian and Russian Jews.

He was profiled back in September in quite an unlikely place, Conde Nast’s Details Magazine, where he made the rather startling confession, even before becoming an Israeli citizen, that he would shoot IDF soldiers who came to remove him from the extremist enclave where he intended to make his home:

…There’s a pledge Khantsis makes, one that it’s also possible to hear from Americans already living in settlements, that might be more troubling to Israeli authorities: If the Israeli military comes to remove him from his new home—and many in Israel believe such an event is likely—he will not leave peacefully.“I would fight against it with all my strength, and I would leave nothing back to try to stop it,” says the slim young man wearing a black yarmulke. He speaks so softly that at times it’s hard to hear him. “If they use violence, then we’re justified doing the same.” Would that include using a gun? “Yes,” he says. Is he absolutely sure that he would use a weapon against Israeli soldiers? “That’s right. I strongly hope it would never come to that,” he says. But “if they’re already shooting us, I’d have no option. I don’t think the right thing to do is turn the other cheek. It’s not a Jewish thing to do.”

The entire story is a real eye-opener as it chronicles other hard-core Hilltop Youth and their forays into violent insurrection against the secular Israeli state.  I got a dark laugh from the thought that the Shin Bet can do some of its best intelligence work by reading glossy American men’s magazines. In this day and age, even wannabe terrorists maintain social networking profiles.  He has a Facebook account, where his political views are listed as “Kach” and religious views are listed as “fundamentalist.”  One thing you have to hand to him: at least he’s honest.  He lists his hometown as “Belgorod Dnestrovskiy, Ukraine.”

I am sorry to say that Khantsis’ Ukrainian origin fits with the fact that many former Soviet Jews came to Israel and America with hardline anti-Communist views which translated into hardline nationalist political views supporting the Likud (in Israel) and parties even farther to the right (like Kach for one).  When Avigdor Lieberman first made aliyah he too made common cause with Kach.

Among the Facebook pages he features are those of Nadia Matar, the Women in Green settler extremist who called for Mahmoud Abbas assassination at a Manhattan synagogue; and Ketzeleh Katz, settler Knesset member featured here in a YouTube video foaming at the mouth against the Israeli TV satire program, Eretz Nehederet; Kahane Tzadak (“Kahane was right”); Mike Huckabee, darling of the settler extremists; and the settler news portal, Arutz Sheva.

He lists his profession as “web designer,” which somehow seems fitting in this age of internet terrorism. He has a Twitter account aptly named, Doom7777.  Seems to have had a fantatical devotion to Gilad Shalit (“Kidnapping, terrorizing, fanatical monsters will not succeed to subdue the Zionist State!”) and his freedom, though he pretty much stopped tweeting once he made aliya.

So this is the cream of American Jewish youth, our latter-day Zionist chalutzim who, like our European grandparents, came to build the land and make it bloom–with settlements, barbed wire, attack dogs, M-16s and hate.  When are we going to wake up and realize this isn’t a Zionist dream, it is a nightmare.  And in order to prevent the nightmare from turning into a cataclysm, we must crack down on this aberrant form of Jewishness and Zionism.  We must destroy these movements and ideas. If neither the Israeli nor American governments takes firmer action they will have only themselves to blame for the consequences.  We have seen what the Jack Teitels can do even with his solo reign of terror.  Imagine what an entire movement of Teitels can do with some ingenuity and intestinal fortitude.  All they have to do is think a little bigger, get someone with the vision of an Osama bin Laden.  That would be all it would take for some real mayhem.

Haaretz notes that this military expulsion order is one of the most severe measures at the disposal of the military authorities in dealing with extremist settlers.  There are currently three such orders in effect against residents of Yitzhar.

The actions taken against Khantsis bring home once again the necessity for the U.S. government to do a better job of monitoring the radical pro-settler movement in this country and the necessity for clamping down on fundraising here on behalf of extremist settlements like Yitzhar and Kfar Tapuach among many others.

For some odd reason Haaretz English omitted Khantsis’ name from its English language report, but not from the Hebrew edition.

Henry Waxman Israel-Baits Jane Harman Opponent

Saturday, January 9th, 2010

Everyone knows about Joe McCarthy’s red-baiting during the 1950s.  Nowadays, the pro-Israel right in this country engages in Israel-baiting especially when it comes to electoral politics.  Every two years the Republican Jewish Coalition gets some rich Jewish chump like Shelly Adelson to ante up a million or two to shrey from the rooftops that the Democrats are soft on Israel.  The stunt works as well for them as Bernie Madoff’s Ponzi scheme ended up working for him.  Many of you will remember the RJC and its affiliated henchmen taking out ads in the Jewish press arguing that Barack Obama was anti-Israel because of an insufficient deference for some Aipac-touted position or other.  We’ve come to expect it of the Republicans and the Israel lobby.  It’s their MO.


But hearing Israel-baiting (the Jewish equivalent of red-baiting) from the heart of the Democratic Party is a new one on me.  Knowing of M.J. Rosenberg’s distaste for Jane Harman and her slavish devotion to Aipac, I suggested that he look up Marcy Winograd’s progressive primary challenge against Harman.  He replied, obliquely mentioning something atrocious Henry Waxman and Lynne Woolsey had pulled.  It took me a while to find it, but I did.

Those of you who follow my blog regularly may remember that I’ve taken on Jane Harman several times over the years as one of Aipac’s most trusted Congressional flunkies.  A few years ago she even enlisted Haim Saban to pressure Nancy Pelosi to name her chair of the House Intelligence Committee.  Harman knew that Pelosi knew that if Saban wanted the former in that job he held an enormous financial sword over the House Speaker’s head since the wealthy Israeli-American was a major donor to the Party.  For a federal official to ask anyone to intervene on her behalf with another federal official in this fashion is illegal and I thought she at least should’ve been indicted.  A separate story came out that as part of an intelligence operation the FBI heard an Israeli agent of influence ask Harman to intercede for a favor.

Thanks to her personal wealth ($112-million and 3rd wealthiest Congress member), political sway and Israel lobby connections she managed to dodge the bullet–this time.

Now, Henry Waxman, the dean of the powerful California Congressional delegation has taken out after Marcy Winograd, Harman’s primary challenger with a crackerjack bit of Israel-baiting:

Recently, I came across as astounding speech by Marcy Winograd, who is running against our friend Jane Harman…Ms. Winograd’s views on Israel I find repugnant in the extreme.

What alarmed Waxman so much?  The fact that Winograd is a progressive Jew who says, along with many other progressive Israelis I might add, that the time for a two-state solution has passed due to Israeli intransigence.  The fact that Winograd opposes U.S. aid that supports Israeli “institutional racism.”  The fact that she doesn’t want to be associated with “occupation or extermination.”

To be clear, my views aren’t the same as Winograd’s.  I’m still hanging on to the possibility for a two-state solution though the prospects grow dimmer by the day.  But I completely reject the notion that such views are “repugnant” or beyond the Jewish pale or whatever.  In fact, we already have over 400 members of Congress who are clones of Waxman’s and Harman’s pro-Israel views.  To have one member of Congress who refuses to toe the Aipac line would not undermine the republic.

Waxman fulminates further:

…The notion that a member of Congress could hold such views is alarming.  Ms. Winograd is far, far outside the bipartisan mainstream of views that has long insisted that U.S. policy be based on rock-solid support for our only democratic ally in the Middle East.

In Winograd’s foreign policy, Israel would cease to exist.  In Winograd’s vision, Jews would be at the mercy of those who do not respect democracy or human rights…Jane’s victory will represent a clear repudiation of these views…

I ask you to join me in showing maximum support for Jane…

This bit of hasbara is standard Aipac boilerplate.  Waxman can probably recite it backwards and forwards and does so thrice a day just as Orthodox Jews recite their daily prayers.  A few problems though: the only democracy in the Middle East leaves out Turkey, Lebanon, Pakistan, and…the Palestine Authority which duly elected Hamas in a democratic election.  A bit of pro-Israel myopia seems to have crept into Waxman’s argument.  And it seems to me that arguing that Palestinians don’t respect “democracy or human rights” ignores the fact that Israel has a few challenges on the human rights front itself.  As for democracy, we can argue about the nature of Israeli democracy, but Hamas actually won a democratic election.  So ignoring Palestinian democracy is at best a glaring omission.

Winograd has drafted her own response to Waxman here. It reads in part:

Like you, I am intimately aware of our Jewish history. On my mother’s side, my great-grandparents escaped the Russian Pogroms to make a better life for themselves in Europe. On my father’s side, my great-grandparents were killed in the Jewish Holocaust of Nazi Germany. Because of our collective experience with persecution, it behooves us to stand in opposition to persecution anywhere and everywhere, rather than sanctify reductionist state policies that cast all Jews as victims who can only thrive in a segregated society. Furthermore, we must stand in explicit opposition to the Israeli persecution of the Palestinians; the brutal blockade of Gaza, an act of war by international standards, denying children clean water, food, and medicine.

We are better than that…

To stop the suffering of the Palestinian people and to end the rocket attacks on Israelis near the border, I am ready and willing to accept a negotiated peace agreement that adheres to principles of justice and recognizes a two-state solution based on withdrawal of illegal settlements to the 1967 borders or a mutually-agreed exchange of territory.

To be fully candid, I think Winograd is in a tough spot here as a Congressional candidate.  If you’ve endorsed a one-state solution you’ve potentially marginalized yourself among your Jewish constituency and other pro-Israel forces.  I wish this wasn’t the case.  But it is.

All that being said, I think times are changing and that Winograd should confront this slightly differently than she has.  I think she should say look, no one in Congress gets to determine whether there will a one or two-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.  The president and secretary of state and the parties themselves will make those determinations.  The main thing any member of Congress should stand for is dignity, respect and justice for both Israelis and Palestinians.  The main thing any member of Congress should oppose is any legislation that demeans or diminishes the rights of either Israelis or Palestinians.

Marcy Winograd hasn’t spent 30 years in the Beltway attending Aipac briefings and Israel junkets.  She hasn’t been fed the standard Likud line as have Congressmembers Harman and Waxman which parrots back Israel right or wrong talking points.  For all the time her opponent has been in Washington, Marcy’s actually been living with her middle-class Los Angeles family dealing with the travails of everyday folk as a teacher and community activist.  She hasn’t had a chance to develop the polished vacuous statements churned out by the Waxman-Harman political machine.

But you know what–Marcy Winograd spoke from the heart in her All Saint’s Church speech out of a sense of pain as a Jew at the suffering of both Israelis and Palestinians.  And if that’s a hanging offense for Harman’s buddies at Aipac, so be it. Nothing she said in her speech can be remotely construed as hostile to Israeli Jews or Israel’s security.  In addition, there are tens of thousands of Israelis who were shocked and scandalized, as she was, by the terrible suffering inflicted by the IDF on Gaza.  So Congressman Waxman, if you smear Marcy Winograd for caring too much about Gazan suffering, you’re smearing those courageous Israelis who believe that what their government and armed forces did their was wrong regardless of the reason for doing so.

Maybe on their next Aipac junket, Harman and Waxman will visit more than the Knesset and meet with other leaders than Bibi and Shimon.  Maybe they will meet with Israeli human rights NGOs like B’Tselem and Peace Now.  Maybe, God forbid they’ll visit the West Bank and Gaza, as Congressmembers Baird and Ellison and Senator Kerry did last year.  Maybe they’ll try to see how the other half lives in the Middle East.  And then maybe they’ll understand that what Marcy Winograd believes isn’t so outrageous after all.  In fact, she has nothing to apologize for.  If anything, it is Harman and Waxman and their slavish relationship with Aipac who have some explaining to do.

Returing to Winograd’s letter above, it also contains a cogent denunciation of the inadequacies of Jane Harman and her betrayal of values that most members of the Democractic Party hold dear.

If you feel like me that Marcy Winograd is not treif and that she represents a true progressive voice that should be in Congress, I hope you’ll join me in supporting her in any way you can (but especially with a financial contribution).

Performance Optimization WordPress Plugins by W3 EDGE