Mahzor

New York Public Library

Churches

Sarajevo Haggadah

Mah Nishtanah

Sarajevo haggadah

Antaea Darom

Israeli women's art

Action

Torah as music

Ben Heine

Action

ceramic bowl

Mohammad Said Kalash, "Offering Reconciliation" exhibit (photo: Ilan Amihai)

Action

Punch and Judy/Pinchas and Jamila

Avi Katz

Action

David Grossman

Ben Heine

Action

Eldrige Street shul

Lower East Side

Action

Dove

Ben Heine

Action

Two birds

Hoda Jamal

Action

Israeli and Palestinian boys

from documentary, Promises

Action

Cat in the Hat

Yiddish version

Action

Daylight through the Wall

Banksy: graffiti art on Separation Wall

Action

Maurice Sendak's Brundibar set

New Victory Theater (photo: Nan Melville/NYT)

Action

Daniel Barenboim, West-Eastern Divan Orchestra

Palestinian-Israeli musical ensemble (photo: Kerstin Joensson/AP)

Action

Great Day on Eldrige Street

N.Y.'s klezmer greats celebrate shul rededication (photo: Leo Sorel)

Action

Joint Appeal for Peace

(Avi Katz)

Joint Appeal for Peace

Ketubah, Ancona, Italy (1772)

(Jewish Theological Seminary library)

Ancona ketubah

Archive for January, 2010

Retired Israeli General: ‘Iran is Very, Very, Very Long Way from Nuclear Capability’

Tuesday, January 19th, 2010

Well, it appears that the Times of London is capable of perpetrating anti-Iranian fraud and sometimes an honest bit of reporting.  The paper’s Israel correspondent reports that the retired IDF general who once ran Israel’s nuclear weapons program disputes the government narrative that Iran is an imminent nuclear threat to Israel and the world:

Israeli general Uzi Eilam says Iran is a long way from nuclear bomb

A general who was once in charge of Israel’s nuclear weapons has claimed that Iran is a “very, very, very long way from building a nuclear capability”.

Brigadier-General Uzi Eilam, 75, a war hero and pillar of the defence establishment, believes it will probably take Iran seven years to make nuclear weapons.

The views expressed by the former director-general of Israel’s Atomic Energy Commission contradict the assessment of Israel’s defence establishment and put him at odds with political leaders.

…Eilam, who is thought to be updated by former colleagues on developments in Iran, calls his country’s official view hysterical. “The intelligence community are spreading frightening voices about Iran,” he said.

He suggested that the “defence establishment is sending out false alarms in order to grab a bigger budget” while some politicians have used Iran to divert attention away from problems at home.

“Those who say that Iran will obtain a bomb within a year’s time, on what basis did they say so?” he asked. “Where is the evidence?”

The Israeli general also argues against an Israeli attack against Iran’s nuclear facilities:

…Eilam argues “such an attack would be counter-productive”.

“One strike is not practical. In order to delay the Iranian programme for three to four years, one needs an armada of aircraft, which only a super-power can provide. Only America can do it.”

A breath of truth and fresh air.  Is anyone listening there in Tel Aviv?  H/t Dan Sisken.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

‘Only Democracy in Middle East™’ Criminalizes Speech

Tuesday, January 19th, 2010

From a Haaretz editorial criticizing Israeli police for false arrest of Sheikh Jarrah protesters:

During Operation Cast Lead, around 800 left-wing protesters were arrested and criminal proceedings were opened against 700 of them.

My critics here like to boast about Israel’s democratic values.  But what truly democratic society criminalizes dissent to such an extent??  Why should an Israeli peace activist need to have a good criminal defense attorney on retainer in order to exercise his or her rights?  Freedom of speech, freedom of assembly, freedom to hold unpopular views.  These are the hallmarks of a true democracy.  Israel, you aren’t there yet.

‘We’re a Small Country With a Big Heart’ and Other Nauseating Bibiisms

Monday, January 18th, 2010

In the annals of Israeli self-promotion this may not be the worst, but perhaps the least of the worst: it’s BAD.  In fact nauseating.  One of my hasbarist commenters noted I should be ashamed because I focus on the triviality of settler violence when the people of Haiti are in peril.  He certainly didn’t expect me to publicize Israel’s sterling response to Haitian suffering, which he did in his comment.  No, not at all.

Now comes this from Ynetnews (h/t Rupa Shah):

…The prime minister said that “the moment the dimensions of the disaster became known, I instructed the immediate deployment of an aid delegation on behalf of the State of Israel, which has already reached the place.

“This includes supplies, medication, doctors, a field hospital, an x-ray machine and many other vital things.  This is the true heritage of the State of Israel and the Jewish people. This act joins similar action we have taken in the past in Mexico, Kenya, and Turkey. We may be a small country, but we are a country with a big heart. This is the expression of Jewish ethics and heritage – to help others.

He means, Israel helps others (cf. black people) when they are several thousand miles away and in danger of extinction.  When they’re Ethiopian children refused a place in kindergarten in Petah Tikva…not so much.  Or Darfuris desperate to flee civil war in their homeland–not so much (they’re expelled).  Or foreign workers abused by Israeli employers–not so much.

Anyone who observes the Israeli political elite in action knows they are tone deaf.  But this sure takes the cake for self-aggrandizement and moral puffery.

Akiva Eldar has it precisely right:

…The remarkable identification with the victims of the terrible tragedy in distant Haiti only underscores the indifference to the ongoing suffering of the people of Gaza. Only a little more than an hour’s drive from the offices of Israel’s major newspapers, 1.5 million people have been besieged on a desert island for two and a half years. Who cares that 80 percent of the men, women and children living in such proximity to us have fallen under the poverty line? How many Israelis know that half of all Gazans are dependent on charity, that Operation Cast Lead created hundreds of amputees, that raw sewage flows from the streets into the sea?

The Israeli newspaper reader knows about the baby pulled from the wreckage in Port-au-Prince. Few have heard about the infants who sleep in the ruins of their families’ homes in Gaza.

…A few days before Israeli physicians rushed to save the lives of injured Haitians, the authorities at the Erez checkpoint prevented 17 people from passing through in order to get to a Ramallah hospital for urgent corneal transplant surgery. Perhaps they voted for Hamas. At the same time that Israeli psychologists are treating Haiti’s orphans with devotion, Israeli inspectors are making sure no one is attempting to plant a doll, a notebook or a bar of chocolate in a container bringing essential goods into Gaza.

…Even the images of our excellent doctors in Haiti cannot blur our ugly face in the Strip.

I urge you to contribute to the American Jewish World Service Haiti Relief Fund (or any charity of your choice).  Unlike Bibi, AJWS does good work day in and day out in Haiti and elsewhere, and doesn’t do so for ulterior motives.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Israeli Judge Calls for Full Hearing in Maan-Malsin Deportation Case

Monday, January 18th, 2010

Tel Aviv district judge Kobi Vardi calls for hearing on Malsin expulsion order

UPDATE: Judge Vardi has just ruled against the Israeli attorney general who argued that Jared Malsin should be immediately deported as a security risk.  The judge found that there might be grounds to overrule the Ministry of the Interior’s decision to deport him based on its claim that the reporter “failed to cooperate.”  One hopes the judge will also find reason to insist that the defendant also be present for the hearing.

*  *

Israeli judge Kobi Vardi, who is hearing the case filed by Palestinian news agency Maan, seeking to prevent the Israeli government from deporting American-Jewish editor Jared Malsin, asked for the defense to reply to the government’s filing.  Malsin is in his sixth day of detention at Ben Gurion Airport in a windowless room with nothing except a small suitcase.  Israel refuses to move him to a proper facility within Israel in order not to upgrade his legal status in the eyes of the court.

The attorney general filed papers defending the deportation order with the judge, who could have immediately ruled in the government’s favor.  Instead, he asked for the defense to reply, which allows Malsin’s team to fight on another day.  The judge could ask for a full hearing and demand that the government produce Malsin as a witness in his own defense; or he could deport him.  If he does, Malsin has recourse to the Israeli Supreme Court, though he would continue to be detained till his case could be heard.

The claims against Malsin by the government, which I’ve outlined earlier, are a smokescreen.  They clearly want to punish English language media reporting that contravenes the government line.  They want to criminalize Palestinian media sources and muzzle them in any way they can.

Governments have great discretion when it comes to immigration issues.  They may admit or exclude anyone for pretty much any reason or none.  But one would hope that even a government as tone-deaf to civil liberties as this one might realize that deporting a reporter merely because his work has been a thorn in the side of the government doesn’t look good for the self-described Only Democracy in the Middle East™.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

U.S. Official Warns Syria Israel Will Bomb

Monday, January 18th, 2010

SA-2 anti-aircraft missiles

I just love unsourced stories like this in the Israeli press: they can mean everything or nothing or something in between.  Usually they’re garbage as likely in this case.  But what’s interesting is the sheer effrontery of whoever the U.S. official is:

An American source says that Syria allowed Hezbollah operatives to train within its territory in the use of advanced SA2 anti-aircraft missile batteries, the Kuwaiti daily Al Rai reported Sunday.  In an interview, the senior U.S. official warned that if Syria supplies Hezbollah with this type of missile, Israel will bomb Damascus and a war will likely ensue.

According to the official, Israel has warned Syria not to allow the transfer of the SA2 missiles into the hands of Hezbollah, and views the transfer of such missiles as the crossing of a red line.  He added that he did not believe that a war would break out soon, unless one of the sides violated the undeclared agreement not to cross the red lines defined by both sides.

The phrase “senior U.S. official” has Dennis Ross written all over it. But I suppose there are other pro-Israel lackeys in the White House it could be.  Imagine a U.S. official having the temerity of doing Israel’s bidding in its battles with its neighbors.  Which government does he think he serves?  Washington or Tel Aviv?

The idea that a defensive weapon like anti-aircraft batteries would be viewed by Israel as grounds for war against Syria is typical of the Israeli strategic mindset.  In their view, anything that threatens their military dominance, even military weapons designed to defend a neighbor’s sovereign territory, is grounds for attack.  All I can say is that the Middle East is changing and the Iron Fist no longer works in terms of Israeli deterrence.  Israel can no longer bomb its way to victory.  I suppose it may take another wasted Lebanon war or two before this lesson sinks in.  But eventually it will.  At least I hope so.  If it doesn’t, then Israel is doomed.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Jerome Slater’s New Blog

Monday, January 18th, 2010

SUNY Buffalo professor emeritus Jerome Slater

SUNY Buffalo political science professor, Jerome Slater has become a welcome addition to the progressive Jewish blog world.  His new one, Jerome Slater: On the U.S. and Israel, covers specific territory for which he is a distinguished expert: human rights, the laws of war and just war theory, and the political rhetoric of the conflict.  Slater is one of the few I know who can take on a figure as formidable as Michael Walzer on his own terms and best him.

Though it is not quite as true now as it once was, I have always said that what the online world needs regarding the I-P conflict is not more savage, confrontational blogs but ones that provide specific expertise and deep knowledge of sources.  Another point I’ve made many a time is that there are too many polemicists and too few academics (right or left) blogging.  That has changed since I first made this argument and a number of excellent academic analysts have entered the fray, but it still holds true.  That’s one of the reasons why Prof. Slater’s blog is so helpful at this time.

His first few posts provide a rebuttal to Moshe Halbertal’s attack on the Goldstone Report and an overall appraisal of that Report and Israeli conduct of the Gaza war.

I urge you to add his blog to your Google Reader.  He plans to treat his blog more as a series of essays than as an everyday blog.  But when he does have something to say it will be important to read it.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Israeli Hearing on Deporting Maan Reporter

Sunday, January 17th, 2010

Malsin meeting with U.S. consul general Daniel Rubenstein under happier circumstances (Maan)

On Sunday morning, Tel Aviv District Court judge Kobi Vardi will hear the case of Jared Malsin, the American Jewish journalist serving as English editor for the Palestinian Maan news agency.  The Shin Bet seeks to expel him from Israel as a security risk because he secured a visa by indicating (falsely they claim) that he might take Israeli citizenship via the Law of Return and because he originally came to Israel on a Birthright trip (among other reasons).  None of the reasons listed can legitimately be terms a “security threat” to Israel or anyone else.

The judge can rule on the spot to deport Malsin or free him.  Or he can call for a full hearing later in the day.  If the judge decides to deport the journalist, then the defense has the option of appealing to the Supreme Court.  The difficulty in this is that the detainee will remain in Israeli detention for the duration until his hearing.  Currently, Malsin is being held in a small cell with blacked out windows and access to nothing other than the small suitcase he had when he returned from his Prague vacation.  There is no indication that Israel is prepared to move him to less punishing accommodations.

The International Federation of Journalists released this statement:

“We condemn this intolerable violation of press freedom,” said Aidan White, IFJ general secretary. “The ban of entry in this case appears to be a reprisal measure for the journalist’s independent reporting and that is unacceptable.”

“Journalists cannot be sworn to support governments in order to gain entry into countries,” White added. “This kind of interference has no place in a democracy.”

My blog colleague, Ray Hanania, of the National Arab American Journalists Association released this statement:

“Any action to censor or restrict or threaten or intimidate journalists for the sole ‘crime’ of expressing an opinion or covering stories frowned on by the occupation government is a violation not only of international law but a violation of Israel’s claim to be Democratic and fair,” said Ray Hanania, Chicago coordinator of NAAJA, which has issued formal letters to Israel’s embassy in Washington, to US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, and to Israel’s Ministry of Information in Jerusalem.

“NAAJA is not only calling on Israel to immediately release Jaslin, but also urging Israeli journalists who claim to be objective and concerned about free speech, Democracy and the accuracy in reporting to also publicly protest the arrest,” he added.

Speaking of which, the Israeli Jerusalem Association of Journalists, while affirming the right of journalists to report freely from Israel (and not necessarily defending Malsin himself), attached this unintentionally ironic statement:

The JAJ warned against campaigns which have a political motive and “ try to portray Israel as a state without media freedom.”

Seems to me you have a wee problem, Israeli journalists.  You claim that in general you support freedom to report from Israel regardless of favoring or opposing government policy.  Yet you won’t specifically defend Malsin and you want to claim that his case does not mean that “media freedom” is absent in Israel.  You can’t have it both ways.  If there IS media freedom, then you defend Malsin and insist that Israel free him to be a journalist and do his job.  If there isn’t, then you refuse to defend Malsin and accept his deportation when or if it happens.  Let us see what transpires.

Those wishing to support Malsin and who are Americans should write to Hillary Clinton and your Congressional representatives as both Malsin and his girlfriend, who WAS deported, are U.S. citizens.  You should also blast your local Israeli consular office.

Malsin’s partner, Faith Rowold, a Lutheran Church volunteer was deported to Prague after being detained with him at Ben Gurion.  She released this statement about the general harassment by the Shin Bet and immigration officials of foreign aid workers in the West Bank:

“Israel is really making it difficult for humanitarian organizations and churches to do their work in Israel and the Palestinian Territories,” Ms. Rowold commented.  “It seems like Israel especially discriminates against organizations that are working with Palestinians or in the Palestinian Territories, making it difficult for workers and volunteers to get the visas they need to stay and do their jobs.  So many people are on tourist visas now, leaving every three months and hoping to get back in.  It is really an insecure situation and it makes long-term planning impossible.”

It has also been reported that approximately 100 church and NGO workers who had previously held B1 work visas from Israel had been denied renewals.  Some were given 6-month tourist visas instead, which do not legally allow the holder to work in Israel.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Jerusalem Museum of Tolerance in Disarray, Gehry Withdraws

Friday, January 15th, 2010

Protest against desecration of Muslim Mamilla cemetery by encroaching Museum of Tolerance construction (BBC)

Phil Weiss has some pretty good sources who last week caught the fact that the entire Museum of Tolerance Jerusalem website disappeared in a puff of smoke.  This led to a story in The Tablet which confirmed the news that internationally-famed architect, Frank Gehry had withdrawn from the project.  The first word from one of his partners was that the reason for the withdrawal was “politically sensitive,” which implied at least some grappling with the criticism against the project from Muslims and Jews alike, because it is currently sited on a historic West Jerusalem Muslim cemetery.

This explanation would have had some semblance of honor to it.  But Gehry, beholden to his big-wig Jewish patrons and clients, backtracked in a subsequent statement in which he pulled the legs out from under his own partner:

“Unfortunately, our staff and resources are committed to other projects around the globe, and thus I will not be able to participate in the redesign effort. Contrary to a published report quoting my partner Craig Webb, this parting has nothing whatsoever to do with perceived political sensitivities.”

Gehry's design in happier, more grandiose days

As a former professional fundraiser, I caught of whiff of failure when I wrote about the capital fundraising for the project last year.  Turned out I was right on the money:

I note that only $115-million of the overall $250-million cost has been raised so far.  Given my fundraising background, I find it odd that a major capital project would be begun without all, or almost all the money already pledged.  You can see that this is not the case by reviewing the Donor Opportunity page at the website.

In particular, there was one glaring missing $77-million lead gift from Gary Winnick (of Global Crossing and Drexel Burnham infamy) who helped Hier conceive the original project when it was named after the would-be donor.  When Winnick’s fortune went belly-up so did the gift.  Oddly, Hier didn’t abandon the project as he should have, probably out of a sense of Pharonic hubris/ Edifice Complex.

I can’t say whether Gehry finally caved to the nasty implications of the siting of his project.  If he did that would indicate he has some sort of spiritual sensitivity or conscience.  But I think it even more likely that given the Winnick disaster and last year’s economic implosion, which hit L.A.’s wealthy real estate developers (and most likely gift prospects) especially hard, Gehry and Hier just had to bow to the hard reality that they didn’t have the money for the project.

Now, the question becomes can Hier build this sucker at all.  My hope is that he can’t.  He’s claiming he plans to scale down the effort and cost.  Maybe yes, maybe no.  But given the bad luck of the project I can’t see the types of glittery philanthropic names necessary to put this thing together jumping at the chance to associate their names with it.

Peace Now released this statement calling for reason from the Wiesenthal folks, something apparently in short supply:

“Frank Gehry’s withdrawal from a project that brings strife and contention rather than tolerance to Jerusalem provides the Wiesenthal Center an opportunity to do what is right and cancel the project or find an alternative site. There is enough tension and conflict in Jerusalem without this Orwellian scheme,” said APN President and CEO Debra DeLee. “It’s time for the Wiesenthal Center to practice tolerance and not provoke Muslims in Jerusalem and the entire world,” DeLee said.

The ugly truth of this project is that Hier made a hash of it from the beginning–from the siting on a Muslim cemetery, to the mission which proclaimed tolerance while trampling on the sensitivities of Muslims, to the fundraising, to the economic climate working against it.  Further, how in God’s name can a right-wing Likudist rabbi who earns his living off the Anti-Semitism industry, attempt to approach the subject of religious tolerance in the Holy Land?  As my rabbi and teacher Elliot Dorff said so memorably, it is a Hillul Hashem (“desecration of God’s name”).

If Hier were sensible he would give the project a respectful burial somewhere outside the Mamilla Muslim cemetery.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
Performance Optimization WordPress Plugins by W3 EDGE