.jpg){kind=small}
mini.jpg)
Russia readies effort to avoid asteroid collision...which could cause it to happen
If I didn’t know better, I’d say this story had to originate with The Onion. Russia, which still hasn’t figured out how to get its citizens to stay sober for longer than 24 hours at a stretch; which thinks nothing of wiping out both terrorists and innocent civilians indiscriminately during hostage sieges; and which thinks nothing of poisoning its enemies to death on foreign shores–is preparing to deflect an asteroid which may or may not come close to striking earth in the coming decades:
Russia’s top space researchers will hold a closed-door meeting to plan a mission to deflect 99942 Apophis, an asteroid that will fly close to Earth two decades from now, said Anatoly N. Perminov, the head of Russia’s space agency, during an interview on Russian radio on Wednesday.Mr. Perminov said Apophis, named for the Egyptian god of destruction, is about three times the size of the Tunguska meteorite, apparently the cause of a 1908 explosion in Siberia that knocked over an estimated 80 million trees. He said that according to his experts’ calculation, there was still time to design a spacecraft that could alter Apophis’s path before it made a dangerous swing toward Earth.
“I don’t remember exactly, but it seems to me it could hit the Earth by 2032,” he said, adding, “We’re talking about people’s lives here. It’s better to spend several million dollars and create this system, which would not allow a collision to happen, than wait for it to happen and kill hundreds of thousands of people.”
I agree with Rusty Schweickart who said much more politely than I–if this asteroid were clear across the galaxy and hadn’t a hope in hell of ever hitting earth I’d say gesund aheit/go to it to Ruskies. But there’s still a 1 in 50,000 chance this thing could strike earth without intervention. That means that the least tinkering could send it right down our windpipes. Wouldn’t it make a lot more sense to experiment on a heavenly body far outside our orbit? Especially considering that Russia’s technical abilities are generally not of the highest?
“It takes a very small change in the Apophis orbit to cause it to impact the Earth instead of missing it,” Mr. Schweickart said. “There are a million asteroids out there. Find another one.”
Right now, with what I know about this proposal I’d say: thank you very much for your concern about earth’s safety, but uh no thanks. Given your success rate, you’ll likely mess this up as badly as you’ve messed up your own country. You remember that all of Oedipus’ machinations to avoid the curse Tiresias had prophesied for him only made the curse happen. If he had done nothing, the curse might have avoided him.
I’d love to see Russia taking climate change as seriously as asteroids. :(
http://www.selfdestructivebastards.com/2010/01/killer-asteroids.html
This really isn’t fair to the Russian space program, Richard. They’re one of the few agencies in the Russian government that wasn’t totally brutalized by the collapse of the Soviet Union and the resulting chaos, and I’d trust them as much as the American space program to deflect an asteroid.
You’re probably right. It may be the one thing they didn’t f(&k up. But would you trust them to move as asteroid out of its orbit?
Yes. Or at least as much as I’d trust any effort by any space program to do so.
I think those comments are down on your usual standard. The former Soviet Union led the way in space exploration all the way until they lost the biggest prize to a much wealthier opponent. Russia is planning to build telescopes succeeding Hubble – the Spectrum-Ultraviolet telescope “which will surpass Hubble in some aspects” (Boris Shustov, director of the Astronomy Institute at the Russian Academy of Sciences), the Spectrum-Radioastron and the Spectrum-X-Ray-Gamma. The Russians are the only people who can rescue the crew of a damaged Shuttle (the ISS inspections of which may mean that Hubble has been abandoned?)
There is some danger in this Russian plan, it could break up the asteroid and make it more difficult to deal with – but I can only see benefit in what we’re hearing so far. Leave them build the heavy lifter and offer them a better diverter f we’ve got one – they’re more cooperative than some people we can think of.
Actually, I have to agree with Andrew. Look at the Soyuz record. If I had to go into space, I’d take a Soyuz before I took a Shuttle. Sure, it’s almost 50 years old, but it’s a reliable workhorse, and I don’t think they’ve ever lost one.
Sometimes simple and tough is better than complex and fancy.
What’s that famous line from the movie ‘The Right Stuff’? (great movie, btw), in the scene with LBJ and top Nasa and U.S. military brass sitting around the big table together and the Wernher von Braun character says in a bit of Cold War bluster, “our Germans are better than their Germans”, referring to the German rocket scientists who pioneered the American and Russian space programs. Yeah, I don’t know. I’m with Andrew and Canada Guy, generally heard good things about the Russian space program & agency. As for technical acumen, well, it’s hard to picture the Russian equivalent of Porsche or Ferrari, so maybe you have a point.