Mahzor

New York Public Library

Churches

Sarajevo Haggadah

Mah Nishtanah

Sarajevo haggadah

Antaea Darom

Israeli women's art

Action

Torah as music

Ben Heine

Action

ceramic bowl

Mohammad Said Kalash, "Offering Reconciliation" exhibit (photo: Ilan Amihai)

Action

Punch and Judy/Pinchas and Jamila

Avi Katz

Action

David Grossman

Ben Heine

Action

Eldrige Street shul

Lower East Side

Action

Dove

Ben Heine

Action

Two birds

Hoda Jamal

Action

Israeli and Palestinian boys

from documentary, Promises

Action

Cat in the Hat

Yiddish version

Action

Daylight through the Wall

Banksy: graffiti art on Separation Wall

Action

Maurice Sendak's Brundibar set

New Victory Theater (photo: Nan Melville/NYT)

Action

Daniel Barenboim, West-Eastern Divan Orchestra

Palestinian-Israeli musical ensemble (photo: Kerstin Joensson/AP)

Action

Great Day on Eldrige Street

N.Y.'s klezmer greats celebrate shul rededication (photo: Leo Sorel)

Action

Joint Appeal for Peace

(Avi Katz)

Joint Appeal for Peace

Ketubah, Ancona, Italy (1772)

(Jewish Theological Seminary library)

Ancona ketubah

Archive for December, 2009

Battle of Sheikh Jarrah

Sunday, December 13th, 2009
Israeli police arrest protesters against Sheikh Jarrah evictions

Israeli police arrest protesters against Sheikh Jarrah evictions

The settlers rage not just in Yasuf, where they burned a mosque.  They’re also on the move in East Jerusalem, where they’re steadily evicting more and more Palestinians in order to Judaize these Arab neighborhoods and eventually reclaim them for the Jewish race.

David Shulman writes another masterful account full of howling rage at the injustice of the Sheikh Jarrah evictions.  The thugs of the Border Police used even more brutality than is their wont in terrorizing peaceful demonstrators.  They sprayed pepper directly into eyes at point blank range.  Eyal Nir, a chemistry lecturer at Ben Gurion University, dangerous terrorist that he is, had his shoulder dislocated by the brutes and was taken to hospital with potential damage to his eyes from the spray:

December 10, 2009 Sheikh Jarrah

As always in violence, it’s impossible to put together a coherent story. You lose track of what happened first, what came next, who got hurt when; the moments stretch out endlessly, run together, overlap, images are superimposed or interwoven; the physical pain gets buried somewhere safe, more or less, inside the surreal limbo of your memory, which seems oddly to correspond to the external limbo of the action as you saw it unfold. So this time I won’t try to tell the story. Instead, a few vignettes:

* A grey, cold Friday afternoon. Winter. Fore-taste of rain. The weekly march to Sheikh Jarrah, to the Palestinian houses that have been invaded by Israeli settlers. As usual, we march to the drums, shouting our slogans. Lo tignov ve-lo tirzach ts’u miyad mi-sheikh jarrah, “Thou shalt not steal, Thou shalt not murder, Get out now from Sheikh Jarrah.” Some in English: “Five, six, seven, eight, Israel is a Fascist state.” I think the so-called Anarchists came up with this one. Do I agree with it? Not really. But this is hardly the moment to fuss over the niceties. How about a “proto-Fascist” state? Doesn’t fit the meter. Anyway, it’s not quite true. Inside the Green Line, but not counting East Jerusalem, Israel is a semi-functional democracy. On the other side of it, in Palestine, there’s another Jewish state, lawless, ruthless, yes, Fascist. The trouble is that the latter state has largely taken over the former.

* We stand in the courtyard of the stolen house, with the Palestinian owners beside us. There are between a hundred and a hundred and fifty of us, perhaps double what we had last week. Many soldiers and border police, also more than last week. Protest is gaining ground. The atmosphere is volatile, riddled with rage. Drums beating louder and louder. Children from the dispossessed families are tying small plastic Palestinian flags on a cord stretched opposite the string of plastic Israeli flags the settlers have draped over the door and window. The courtyard is littered, still, with the detritus that was once a family’s life: toys, kitchen appliances, an old couch, a wobbly table; all have been rained on this week, some have sunk into the mud. There’s probably something a little irritating to the soldiers and the settlers, I think and hope, in the chants we are hurling at them. “From Sheikh Jarrah to Bil’in/ Freedom now for Filastin.” I look around me: mostly young people, gentle but tough—many students, some I know from my classes, musicians, painters, poets, meditators, activists, young parents with babies folded in slings on their breasts—all of them totally non-violent, of course; and the demonstration is perfectly legal, no question about that, the police themselves issued the permit.

* Somehow it begins. Someone gave the order. I don’t know who. Later someone says it may have been connected to the flags. It’s possible—I didn’t see it—that one of our demonstrators reached the window of the stolen house and tore down the plastic Israeli flag. Maybe that triggered it. But I think they were anyway just itching to tear into this crowd. So when the moment comes, it starts somewhere at the edge of the family’s tent set up in what’s left of their own front yard and then swirls rapidly in widening arcs and circles, a vortex drawing each of us in. I am washed by a human wave out of the courtyard and into the street. They have grabbed one of our people and they are pushing him up against the command car and we surround them, trying to release our captive from their grip.

* Waves of green uniforms followed by waves of blue—police reinforcements have arrived. Many screams. The border police, as usual, are the most aggressive. Punching, fighting their way forward through the crowd, seizing victims at random, pushing them to the ground, pinning their arms behind them, carrying them off. Drumming goes on, builds toward a climax, ebbs, rises again. We stand our ground. We lock arms in a circle to keep them from forcing one of their chosen victims into a waiting police car. Much shouting. They break through, drag their prey brutally by the arms along the ground.

* Wandering in a pocket of relative silence. Eddies of dizzying attacks all along the street. Another wave. Now they have drawn blood, and they seem to like the taste of it. They want more. More and more. They go after the drummers, arrest them. Many seemingly random victims, too. Sandy says to me: “They’re like storm troopers. No other image comes to mind.” Some of our people are crying. Another charge. Young girls carried off, screaming. Sarah thrown to the ground, pounded, dragged over the stones. Again we try to close ranks. More waves. Time expands, elastic, twisting and turning back on itself, remorseless; this misery will never stop. Some of the border police are spraying us with an aerosol mix of chili pepper and tear-gas, at close quarters, straight into the face. It’s not like the usual tear-gas canisters I know well; this is concentrated, and it burns and scorches as if it had burrowed into the pores of your skin and, in particular, your eyes. Even now, two hours later, my face and lips feel singed by flames.

* In the middle of it all—perhaps you won’t believe me—an elderly Palestinian gentleman from one of the evicted families materializes with a round bronze plate loaded with dozens of tiny white plastic cups of Turkish coffee. He moves, dreamlike, among us, an imperturbable, humane host worried about how his guests are faring. He calmly offers us coffee. Vicious bursts of staccato blows and intimate violent follies spin madly around him.

* Pushed heavily from behind by a phalanx of policemen, we are driven unevenly away from the stolen homes, toward the upper end of the street. Our numbers have diminished: some 15 have been arrested so far; by a fluke, I am not yet among them. Some of them are herded, captive, into the courtyard and then, we learn later, into the house, with the settlers there to gloat at them. They are lost to us for now, out of contact. We make rough lists of those we know are under arrest. Meanwhile more and more are seized, for no apparent reason, and marched off into the waiting vehicles—by now a considerable fleet. About ten of our people have been wounded. Alon, an internationally known jurist, my colleague at the university, is arguing fruitlessly with the officers: what they are doing, he tells them, is totally illegal. He quotes the law. The soldiers rough him up, too.

* Cries floating through the late-afternoon space, in rhymed Hebrew: “Soldiers, listen well, you have the right to refuse.” Another nicety: if you say to them, “You have the duty to refuse,” they can arrest you for incitement. “Criminals! Cowards! Thieves! You’re protecting thieves!” A few courageous drummers are still beating out the time. The senior officer tries desperately to shout through the megaphone that we must disperse at once or we will all be arrested; his voice is drowned out by the drums. More attacks, yet another wave. On and on and on. The longer it goes on, the clearer it becomes that this is no random business, a police action that got out of hand; someone higher up has taken a decision to stamp out dissent in East Jerusalem.

* Tonight is the first candle of Hanukah, another one of those alleged Jewish festivals of freedom. Early this morning, at Kafr Yasuf in the northern West Bank, settlers set fire to a mosque. They left some graffiti on the walls: “We will burn you all.” Copies of the Koran were torn and torched, prayer-rugs burnt. Jews did this. It’s important to understand what this sentence means. Burning means something to us. No doubt the occupation system will protect the perpetrators; and even if, by some miracle, they’re pursued and arrested and, by a still greater miracle, brought to trial, you can depend upon the Israeli courts to set them free without punishment. It’s been that way for decades now. Soldiers, border police, probably plain-clothes intelligence agents too—they’re the ones beating my students, spraying us with gas, prodding us like cattle along the street; all this to protect the settler hooligans who have taken over these homes. These same soldiers and policemen routinely protect the settlers all over the territories. So I guess Hanukah doesn’t really count any more when it comes to freedom; or maybe it merely celebrates our freedom to lie to ourselves and to others, as Bibi does when he pretends he wants peace as he hurts and humiliates the Palestinians ever further. There’s no end to it, either, only deepening darkness, early winter of the soul. Suddenly I realize that we Israelis have never truly been free, despite what we say; for nature has a law: you cannot diminish another’s freedom without impairing or destroying your own. I hope a day will come when the Jews, too, will have the courage to be free.

Thanks to Ofer Neiman and Haggai Matar for their work in publicizing this incident.

Russia Will Back Sanctions, Israel’s New ‘If Wishing Made it So’ Approach to Iran Policy

Sunday, December 13th, 2009

You have to wonder what they’re smokin’ over there at the Israeli foreign ministry in Tel Aviv.  Haaretz’s resident government stenographer, Barak Ravid, reports that an anonymous government official actually had the effrontery to tell him that the Russians will back a new round of punishing sanctions against Iran:

Israeli officials’ intensive talks with their Russian counterparts have led them to believe that Russian President Dmitry Medvedev is more willing than ever before to advance additional sanctions against the Islamic Republic.

Israeli and European authorities believe Russia’s support virtually guarantees that new sanctions may be put in place. According to a senior Israeli official, “If Russia moves toward sanctions, the Chinese won’t want to be left standing alone, and will have no other choice but to join as well.”

Nonetheless, Israel is interested in drafting an alternative plan in case the Security Council debates do not progress.

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said in closed-door meetings that an effective sanctions package can be assembled through U.S.-EU cooperation, bolstered with assistance from regional powers like Japan and South Korea.

Ah yes, Medvedev is “more willing” to back sanctions than ever before.  That would mean he’s more willing to back them than the last few times he’s publicly refused to commit to them.  And whenever he HAS made sympathetic noises he has contradicted them as soon as Ahmadinejad made a visit to Moscow.

And don’t ya just love the scenario by which China will see it’s the only country in the room with it’s pants down and will run for cover when it finds that Russia has got religion and joined the crowd in punishing Iran.  By what logic or rationale can anyone say that China is likely to do any such thing??

The truth is this is a typical example of an Israeli government policy mode which I call “if wishing made it so.”  If you want something badly enough, well it’s just gotta happen, doesn’t it?  Well, no, it doesn’t.  This policy approach overlooks the fact that governments like Russia and China actually have their own interests and they might-just might, find those interests more allied with Iran than Israel especially since Iran is a close neighbor and major trading/business partner.  Essentially, there is a lot more money to be made in Iran than Israel.  So why would these two major powers agree to sanctions if it hurts them in the pocketbook and if they view the policy as doomed to failure, as it undoubtedly is?

I presume this must be a ploy by which Israel hopes to put pressure on Russia to adopt a policy that it (Israel) wants it (Russia) to adopt.  If so, this seems awfully feeble.  Medvedev could brush this off as an elephant swats a fly.

It’s curious that Netanyahu would believe an alternative sanctions plan could be “effective” sans two of Iran’s most critical trade partners.  This defies common sense, a commodity apparently not in great supply among Israeli government officials.

The Israelis have to be quite happy with Robert Gates’ recent comments predicting a new round of sanctions, the first time he has ever talked of such an eventuality.  It appears that the Israeli diplomats, the Mossad, and domestic anti-Iran hawks are in the ascendancy for the moment.

Settler Pogrom in Yasuf, Mosque Burned with Quran

Saturday, December 12th, 2009
Charred fragment of Muslim holy texts from Yasuf mosque (Atef abu-Rob/B'Tselem)

Charred fragment of Muslim holy texts from Yasuf mosque (Atef abu-Rob/B'Tselem)

B’Tselem provided me with this poignant image of the devastation wrought by thuggish settlers from the settlement of Tapuah, who torched the mosque of the West Bank village of Yasuf.  You can read the horrible words about what these brutish Jews did, but nothing conveys it better than an image like this.  Where have we seen the charred letters of prayer books before?  Among those of burned Polish synagogues of course during the Holocaust.

I’m also reminded of another powerful Midrash about the burning fragments of our own sacred Torah and the role they played in a historic event of Jewish martyrdom at the hands of the cruel Romans:

The fourth martyr was Hananiah ben Teradion, who was wrapped in a scroll of the Law and placed on a pyre of green brushwood; to prolong his agony wet wool was placed on his chest…His disciples then asked: “Master, what seest thou?” He answered: “I see the parchment burning while the letters of the Law soar upward.”

I hope the pogromists are proud that they have adopted the tactics of the worst of our historic Jewish assailants.  This hooliganism is given the name “price tag” by the Hilltop Youth who engage in it. I ask: how long with Israelis be willing to pay the price?  When will the price on the tag be so high that they will turn away in revulsion?

Another book-burning--Kristallnacht

Another book-burning--Kristallnacht

Interesting that American Jewish pro-Israel forces seem to have developed a thin veneer of conscience about this event.  Either it troubles them enough, or more likely the images are so powerful and damage it does to Israel so strong, that they’ve found it useful to condemn the conflagration at Yasuf.  “Round up the usual suspects,” I hear them say in the words of Capt. Renault in Casablanca.  These groups are about as committed to getting to the bottom of this heinous crime as the Nazis were in that famous film.

A few of you will no doubt chide me for my cynicism.  But let’s put it this way: how many of these groups will be sending volunteers to rebuild that mosque and restock it with Muslim holy texts?  How many will be standing guard to prevent the next Jewish pogrom there?  I know that Peace Now will be there as I assume will some other Israeli human rights groups.  But will there be any representative of the Orthodox movement, ADL, AJC?  When they take this sort of Jewish hate seriously enough that they’re willing to actually DO SOMETHING about it rather than write a press release, then I’ll know that change has come.

On This Day of Rededication of Holy Temple, Settlers Desecrate Palestinian Mosque

Saturday, December 12th, 2009
Library of Yasuf mosque containing burned pages of Qurans (Abed Omar Qusini/Reuters)

Palestinians inspect burnt remains of copies of Koran in Yasuf mosque (Abed Omar Qusini/Reuters)

Tonight is the first night of Hanukah.  As Ori Nir so aptly points out below, it is ironic that at the beginning of this holiday in which Jews celebrate the rededication of their Holy Temple after years of defilement at the hands of the Greeks, settlers from the extremist Tapuah settlement torched and desecrated a Palestinian mosque (not the first either):

Today, as Jews worldwide commemorate the desecration of the Temple and celebrate its rededication, Jewish extremists, most likely West Bank settlers, desecrated a mosque in a Palestinian village near Nablus.

The mosque, in the Palestinian village of  Yasuf, was torched. Copies of the Koran were burnt. Hateful graffiti in Hebrew was sprayed at the site referring to the settlers’ “Price Tag” vigilante operation to attack Palestinians and Israeli security forces to deter Israel’s authorities from enforcing the law on the settlers.

Michelsberg synagogue in flames, Kristallnacht 1938

Michelsberg synagogue in flames Kristallnacht 1938

Arab News and Yediot Achronot noted that one graffito said: “We will burn you all.”  Haaretz also notes that Nazi graffiti was inscribed as well.  Another irony.    Peace Now has quite rightly labelled this “a Jewish pogrom.”  During the Holocaust, the Germans defiled our synagogues and burned us in crematoria.  Now ‘our’ Jews defile mosques and threaten a Muslim Holocaust.  What they did to us we now do to others, never having learned a lesson from history.  We have become what we hated.  We have gone from being a “light unto the nations” to a charnel house unto the nations.  What gifts we offer to civilization!

Can there be any doubt why English anti-immigrant extremists wave Israeli flags during their demonstrations against Anglo-Muslims?  Can there be any doubt why Aipac seeks to make common cause with India’s Hindu nationalists who battle against that country’s Muslim minority?  Is that what Israel has come down to?  A holy war between Jew and Muslim?  When will the average Israeli say: “Dai kfar, these bastards don’t represent me!”  Ah yes, I know.  They may never do that.  That’s why it’s sometimes so lonely to be a critical Zionist.

Tzipi Livni opened her mouth and the right words came out, but we all know that they will lead to nothing:

“We must turn to introspection and contend with what is happening within Israeli society.”

Deeds not words, Ms. Livni.  We need acts as proof of commitment.  Words are worthless since so many have been spoken promising so much and producing so little.

This statement from Haaretz is also indicative:

Investigation into the incident points to the likelihood that settlers from nearby Tapuah are behind the attack, police said, but the vandals have not yet been caught.

Oh, yes, someone may eventually be arrested, maybe even prosecuted, maybe even put in jail.  But 100 others will take his place because Israel really doesn’t have its heart in this.  It is so ambivalent about protecting the rights of Palestinians under Occupation.  Why should the average Israeli care?  And they don’t.  So whether they catch the settler thug or not is immaterial to Israel or Israelis.  If they do it is not because anyone wishes to uphold the rule of law or protect anyone’s rights.  It is only to protect Israel’s image on the world stage.  To let the defilers go free would give Israel a black eye.  That’s all that the country and its people care about.

Oren Smears J Street–Again

Friday, December 11th, 2009

Israeli ambassador Michael Oren has had an awkward relationship with J Street.  Despite much tender wooing by the group’s director, Jeremy Ben-Ami, Oren stayed away from its first national conference.  This was viewed as a something between a slap in the face and a slap on the wrist for the Jewish peace lobby, which often disagrees with the views of the current rightist Israeli government.

Writing in The Forward, Josh Nathan-Kazis reports that Oren has not only taken the gloves off, he’s taken leave of truth:

Addressing a breakfast session at the United Synagogue of Conservative Judaism’s biennial convention December 7, Ambassador Michael Oren described J Street as “a unique problem in that it not only opposes one policy of one Israeli government, it opposes all policies of all Israeli governments. It’s significantly out of the mainstream.”

…This is not a matter of settlements here [or] there. We understand there are differences of opinion,” Oren said. “But when it comes to the survival of the Jewish state, there should be no differences of opinion.

This is patently a lie.  And Oren certainly knows this.  But the fact that he somehow believes that American Jews interested enough in J Street or what he has to say about it will not know it is a lie, indicates he is beyond cynical.

We should add to this that an inside source informed me that Israel’s consul general in San Francisco, Akiva Tor, told a prospective major local donor they should not give to J Street because it is supported by Arab extremists.  When I queried him, the consul general flatly denied the charge and told me anyone making it was lying.  Which is interesting because the person who informed me, heard this directly from the prospective donor.  So in effect, Tor is accusing the prospective donor or his confidant of lying.

On a different subject, Oren again engaged in sophistry when asked his opinion about a Conservative Jewish woman arrested at the Kotel for removing a Torah scroll from the handbag she was carrying.  The Orthodox mafia controlling the Kotel insisted that she be arrested for violating an agreement that found women could not read Torah or carry it at the Kotel.  Here is Oren’s response:

“It is not a perfect situation.” Oren said. “We in Israel have to strike a balance between our respect for pluralism and our respect for tradition.”

What is disingenuous in this response is that the Conservative movement represents Jewish tradition just as much as the Orthodox mafiosi do.  So to presume that “tradition” is only represented by the Orthodox sets up a false dichotomy between the latter and Conservative Judaism.

In this statement as well, Oren dissembles:

Oren said that original reports stating that Frenkel had been arrested were mistaken, and that she was simply led away from the Kotel area.

Actually, Haaretz (and Nathan-Kazis in this article) confirms she was detained by Israeli police and taken to a police station and questioned there for an extended period.  Frenkel herself wrote in The Forward of her detention at a police station.  She may not have been arrested.  But much more was done to her than leading her away from the Kotel.

How does it look when the Israeli ambassador, supposedly a well-respected academic expert on Israel-U.S. relations before his appointment, has such an elemental disdain for truth and facts?  To me, this signifies his basic disrespect for American Jews and our intelligence.  I have no problem with an Israeli diplomat disagreeing with my views or those of liberal groups I support.  But I expect at the very least an accurate depiction of what those views are before expounding on our differences.  Oren can’t even give us that respect.

Israeli Poster Artists Honor 60th Anniversary of Geneva Conventions

Thursday, December 10th, 2009

acri human rights poster vision chartThe Association for Civil Rights in Israel is sponsoring a poster competition to celebrate the 60th anniversary of the Geneva Conventions.  The winner of the contest will be announced on December 10th, International Human Rights Day.  The graphic art is extraordinary and confronts Israel’s human rights situation head on.

ACRI joined together with the City of Holon to exhibit some of the posters outdoors and it stirred great controversy among those who believe that discussing these issues can only damage Israel.  The right-wing group, If You Will It, complained to the Israeli government and asked it to investigate whether the city exhibit was mounted with state funds.  It also demanded the firing of any employees who helped organize the exhibition.

This is the typical extreme nationalist backlash against anything that smacks of leftist “defeatism.”  Among the interesting reasons for fearing the exhibit’s message:

There is no need to point out that the purpose of this exhibit is to continue the demonization of the IDF…through its representation as cruel and immoral in order to lay the groundwork for those elements in Israel and abroad pursuing Israeli officers for the purpose of bringing them to justice [for war crimes].

acri separation wallSeveral posters stand out for varying reasons.  One titled, You Don’t See It with Your Own Eyes? (the English translation on the poster isn’t precise) comments on the Gaza war and Occupation in general.  Graphically, it mimics a vision chart with numbers displaying on each line along with text, as each line gets progressively smaller.  The top line displays the number of agreements Israel has signed; next the number of Gaza war dead; next the number of civilian dead; then the length of the wall; number of checkpoints; number of years the Geneva Conventions have existed; the number of Conventions; and finally the number of peoples (2); and conflicts (1).

Another displays three “windows” through which you see an idyllic rural image with the caption, “there are those who gaze out on pastoral landscape;” and an urban image, “others view urban landscape;” and finally a solid graffiti-strewn image of the Separate Wall, “and those who see nothing.”

This too is a testament to power of art to “see” the social landscape in the way that the average Israeli almost never does.  And that is why the Israeli right seeks to demonize this exhibit.  It is dangerous to the equilibrium of the Israeli public.  The current government needs to maintain an image of an Israel that is secure, safe, and stable.  That image is what allows Israel to continue to defy international law and bodies, and the power of the U.S., EU and other governments insisting that it return to 1967 boundaries and recognize a Palestinian state.  Anything that threatens this slumber into which Israelis have slipped is a danger.

H/t to Didi Remez for bringing this story to my attention and helping me find the poster images.

EU Caves on Recognizing Palestinian State

Thursday, December 10th, 2009

In a move that promised to advance international support for an independent Palestinian state within 1967 borders, Sweden had proposed to the EU that it explicitly endorse such a proposal with East Jerusalem as capital of that new state.  Israel was apoplectic and promised everything short of nuclear retailiation.  As a result, the EU caved and produced a watered down draft which basically restates past policy.

Score this as yet another victory for Bibi.

Sweden had hoped to deliver a strong blow to Israel’s continued intransigence in major matters leading to a peace settlement.  Also, it hoped that this proposal, if passed, would encourage the Palestinians and perhaps even bring them back to the negotiating table.  Alas, this was not to be.  Europe, as usual, shrunk back when having the courage of its convictions was called for.  Get this fumfering:

Foreign Minister Carl Bildt of Sweden, which holds the rotating European Union presidency, said the time is not right for recognizing a Palestinian state.

“I do not think we are there yet,” he said. “I would hope that we would be in a position to recognize a Palestinian state, but there has to be one firstSo I think that is somewhat premature.  We have said previously if you go back to what the European Union has said that we would be in a position to recognize a Palestinian state, but the conditions are not there as of yet.”

Bildt said the European Union is discussing other steps to increase support for Palestinian aspirations.  And at a press conference later in the day, EU foreign policy chief Javier Solana offered strong backing for an eventual Palestinian state.

What does it mean to offer “strong backing” for something that does not exist and can never come into being, unless you first recognize it and say not only that it SHOULD exist, but that as far as you are concerned it DOES exist?  The idea that the EU cannot recognize a state until there is one is pathetic beyond words.  That’s because Israel has a built-in veto over such an eventuality.  So essentially the Europeans are going to continue to allow Israel to hold Palestine’s fate by the balls.

This is not the way for the international community to advance the peace process.  It is a way to maintain the deadly status quo.  Let’s be perfectly clear that Europe came face to face with Israel and a Palestinian state, and blinked.  The Palestinians shafted yet again.

Somebody Tell Jeffrey Goldberg That Orrin Hatch Doesn’t Do Hip-Hop

Wednesday, December 9th, 2009


UPDATE: Jeffrey Goldberg would like all my readers to know that he knows hip-hop from borsht and is indeed a child of the Hood (in Hebrew that would be ben-Hood). I withdraw this particular claim in my article. But his taste in music still leaves much to be desired.

Ugh, why do they give me such good material?  No sooner does a settler leader claim that Jews aren’t popsicles then Jeffrey Goldberg cajoles a Mormon U.S. senator to write a dreadful Hanukah song, which Goldberg promptly (and erroneously) labels “hip hop.”

You’ve really got to see this video to believe it.  In it, Hatch, who wrote the lyrics (but clearly not the music which was written by a liberal Jewish composer specializing in Christian music–I kid you not), clearly seems uncomfortable with the music written for his song.  Unless it’s just his goyische Mormon woodenness exhibiting itself.

There’s far too much irony to go around here. First, Goldberg, who ignorantly claims that all Hanukah music is dreck, challenges Hatch to write a Hanukah song which turns out to be just that. Second, Goldberg calls a pure pop song “hip hop.” Perhaps someone should tell him that nice Jewish boys who’ve never gotten closer to the Hood than driving down the West Side Highway shouldn’t pretend to know anything about such things. Third, the song is performed by a bleached blond Syrian-American from Indiana.

I also take strong issue with the N.Y. Times reporter who calls this song “catchy,” unless you’re talking about it in the same terms as catching a case of H1N1. It also grieves me endlessly to learn that while this is Hatch’s first Jewish song “it won’t be his last.”

“Anything I can do for the Jewish people, I will do,” Mr. Hatch said…

I think you’ve done quite enough, senator. Now, can you just leave us alone to celebrate our holiday without the help of philo-Semites like yourself? Perhaps Jewish philanthropy, known for its fundraising prowess can raise a substantial sum and give it to the Mormon Tabernacle Choir on condition that Hatch never set foot in the realm of Jewish music again.

Mr. Hatch keeps a Torah in his Senate office.

“Not a real Torah, but sort of a mock Torah,” he said. “I feel sorry I’m not Jewish sometimes.”

Look, if we make you an honorary Jew do you think you could go away and adopt some other religion as your mascot??

He said his ultimate goal would be for his idol, Ms. Streisand, to perform one of his songs. “It would be good for her and good for me,” Mr. Hatch said…

Barbara, if you’re reading this, take the phone off the hook, screen your calls and mail and stay away from Congressional Christmas-Hanukah parties. Otherwise, you might be blackmailed into singing this piece of dreck at your next Kennedy Center concert.

This passage really gave me the willies:

In short, he loves the Jews. And based on an early sampling of listeners, the feeling could be mutual.

“Mutual?” Says who?

The online Jewish culture-news portal which Dan Sieradski so aptly calls “The Tabloid” is the beneficiary of this super shlock and its editor is kvelling (unjustifiably in my opinion):

“Watching Orrin Hatch in the studio, I said to myself that nothing this great will ever happen to me again,” said Alana Newhouse, the editor-in-chief of Tablet.

Well, I guess if you’re a Jewish Mormon-lover who admires old, white, right-wing U.S. senators who write corny, white-bread lyrics…

The reporter, Mark Leibovich, does the word “mensch” a deep disservice by calling Goldberg a “well-known mensch about town.” He’s no mensch in my book. And I don’t believe in using that term in a corny, sentimental way as Leibovich has done. It should only be used as a term of deep respect, one which Goldberg in no way deserves, at least not based on his published record.

Performance Optimization WordPress Plugins by W3 EDGE