Mahzor

New York Public Library

Churches

Sarajevo Haggadah

Mah Nishtanah

Sarajevo haggadah

Antaea Darom

Israeli women's art

Action

Torah as music

Ben Heine

Action

ceramic bowl

Mohammad Said Kalash, "Offering Reconciliation" exhibit (photo: Ilan Amihai)

Action

Punch and Judy/Pinchas and Jamila

Avi Katz

Action

David Grossman

Ben Heine

Action

Eldrige Street shul

Lower East Side

Action

Dove

Ben Heine

Action

Two birds

Hoda Jamal

Action

Israeli and Palestinian boys

from documentary, Promises

Action

Cat in the Hat

Yiddish version

Action

Daylight through the Wall

Banksy: graffiti art on Separation Wall

Action

Maurice Sendak's Brundibar set

New Victory Theater (photo: Nan Melville/NYT)

Action

Daniel Barenboim, West-Eastern Divan Orchestra

Palestinian-Israeli musical ensemble (photo: Kerstin Joensson/AP)

Action

Great Day on Eldrige Street

N.Y.'s klezmer greats celebrate shul rededication (photo: Leo Sorel)

Action

Joint Appeal for Peace

(Avi Katz)

Joint Appeal for Peace

Ketubah, Ancona, Italy (1772)

(Jewish Theological Seminary library)

Ancona ketubah

Archive for December, 2009

Yeshiva University, Producing Settlers of Tomorrow

Wednesday, December 30th, 2009

YU president Richard Joel, producing settlers of tomorrow

In the recent past, Phil Weiss, Didi Remez and I have been documenting American Jewish support for the most extreme elements of the Israeli settler movement. As David Ignatius reported in the Washington Post a year or so ago, over $33-million has been donated by American Jews over a 2-3 year period to those settlements and extremist organizations which have fomented much of the worst anti-Palestinian violence in the West Bank.

But if truth be told, one could argue that the Hebron Fund, Machanaim and Od Yosef Chai were groups somewhat marginal to the American Jewish scene.  You can’t argue this about Yeshiva University though, the leading Orthodox Jewish educational institution in the United States.

I reported some time ago the embarrassing news that YU’s rabbinical school dean told students at the school’s Israeli campus that they should shoot any Israeli leader who divided Jerusalem and resign from the IDF.  Interestingly, the rabbi (yes, rabbi) never retracted his remarks and no one at the school did either.  But the rabbi mysteriously disappeared from the country a day or so after his ill-conceived remarks were leaked.

Now, we have incontrovertible evidence that the above incident was not a one-off exception.  Back when I was in high school, there used to be 4H and Future Farmers of America that hosted after school activities some students attended.  That’s what I recalled when I heard that YU is recruiting future settlers of America.    YU is sending its students to Hebrew language courses in “Judea and Samaria” in a deliberately ideological gesture intended to support the settler movement and indoctrinate future settlers:

For participants in the Yeshiva University schools’ newest exchange program, the last month has been one of slumber parties, shopping trips, Hebrew-language immersion and settler ideology.In early December the Queens, N.Y.-based Samuel H. Wang Yeshiva University High School for Girls became the first American girls’ school on record to immerse its students in West Bank-based programming.

The Wang school now has 10 of its 15- and 16-year-old girls attending Ulpanat Tzvia, where they study Hebrew and live in dormitories alongside their Israeli peers at the school’s campus in the West Bank community of Ma’ale Adumim — 4.5 miles outside of Jerusalem.

Judea and Samaria is number one on our list of priorities,” Shoshana Frankel, an English teacher who runs the exchange program at Ulpanat Tzvia, said, referring to the West Bank by its Hebrew names. “Eretz Yisrael Hashleima [the Whole Land of Israel ideology] is very much our policy here and we don’t keep any secrets about it.”

…Since settler ideology is what Frankel calls “the underlying principle of the school,” the visiting American students attend meetings organized by Ariel — the right-wing breakaway from the mainstream religious Zionist youth movement Bnei Akiva.

The following passage indicates how well the students have absorbed the ideological training that will turn them into willing second or third-generation recruits for the settler enterprise:

But it was not long into the visit before politics came into the picture…On December 9 classes finished early so that any member of the student body who wanted could get to Jerusalem in time to take part in a large demonstration against the freeze on buildings in the settlements.

By this time, some of the American girls already had strong feelings on the issue, which they made known in classroom discussions. “One girl was saying that she felt that we shouldn’t go and protest because she felt that would be a chilul hashem [desecration of God’s name],” said Rivka Cohen, 15, of West Hempstead, N.Y. “But I disagreed — I think that it would be a chilul hashem if we didn’t go and protest.”

Rivka and friends said they did not go to the demonstration because, due to the terms of the exchange, the visiting students are less free to travel the country on their own than are the Israeli students.

But the American students were all alone in the 150-student capacity dorms that night — and many were at the demonstration in spirit. “I feel that we should protest and that we should be able to keep building,” Rachel said.

Yolly said that the political initiation has been eye-opening: “Back in America I never knew what they were talking about. Now I see all these places and now I understand — oh, to give away this place or that, now I understand how it will affect Israel.”

Note how the girls are already reflecting the poisonous settler attitude that the latter’s own peculiar interests are the same as those of the entire state of Israel.  The Judean movement needs new blood in order to survive.  To a great extent this will happen naturally from the settler’s own procreative activities.  But the movement also needs the prestige and support of Diaspora Jewry if it doesn’t wish to become entirely insular.  These new recruits will lend stature to the enterprise and become the next generation of settlers and Hilltop Youth.

All thanks to the support of mainstream Orthodox institutions like Yeshiva University.  While I concede that most YU donors would be in accord with such rightist activism, there may be a few for whom this is unpalatable.  It is for these that I publish this post.  The next time Richard Joel, YU’s president, attempts to put his university in the mainstream of American Jewry, a few of us will cry out: “Not so!”

Rosa Parks, Settler

Wednesday, December 30th, 2009

Rosa Parks pictured with her 'settler mentor'

Haaretz has published the lowest of the low, an op-ed by a settler activist attempting to appropriate Rosa Parks for the sake of the settler movement:

Once upon a time there was a black woman; her name was Rosa Parks. There were racially discriminating laws in the United States, but she continued to sit on the bus even when she was told to vacate her seat for a white person. She was arrested, which set off a process whose end saw the abolishment of racial segregation on American buses. How is it possible that one little black woman, a dressmaker by profession, could change history simply because she remained sitting? Her protest was stronger than any demonstration, op-ed piece or Knesset vote. She opted for the natural choice; that is why she was triumphant.

Every so often here I trot out that magnificent piece of anti-McCarthy oratory by Joseph C. Welch and it seems so appropriate here:

You have done enough. Have you no sense of decency sir, at long last? Have you left no sense of decency?

…Mr. McCarthy…If there is a God in heaven, it will do neither you nor your cause any good…

For the settlers to attempt to dress their cause in the raiment of the American civil rights movements is odious and offensive when their cause is ipso facto racist to the core.  I don’t know who they think they’re appealing to with this fraudulent pap.  Do they think ignorant Americans will buy this load of manure?  Do they take us for complete fools?

We should remember that no matter how insulting this line of argument may be for Americans who know something about their history, this is the type of treatment that the settlers inflict on Israelis virtually every day.  They twist the political truth and defile moral decency in their desperate attempt to blackmail the Israeli public into cooperating with their delusions of manifest destiny, Israel-style.

H/t to Mary Hughes.

Settlers, the Video Game

Wednesday, December 30th, 2009

Needs no commentary…

Iran Nuclear Trigger Document a Forgery, Mossad Suspected

Wednesday, December 30th, 2009

Times of London alleged scoop is likely fraud (Times of London)

Several weeks ago at the Iran conference I organized here in Seattle, Muhammad Sahimi was asked about the Times of London report that an Iranian intelligence memo purportedly claimed that country was developing a nuclear triggering device that could ignite a nuclear weapon.  The force of this report was that Iran was forging full steam ahead with its plan to develop and utilize nuclear weapons.  Sahimi, an expert in Iran’s nuclear program, said in no uncertain terms that neither the supposed Iranian document nor the media report were reliable.  Turns out he was right.  And how right!

U.S. intelligence has concluded that the document published recently by the Times of London, which purportedly describes an Iranian plan to do experiments on what the newspaper described as a “neutron initiator” for an atomic weapon, is a fabrication, according to a former Central Intelligence Agency official.

Philip Giraldi, who was a CIA counterterrorism official from 1976 to 1992, told IPS that intelligence sources say that the United States had nothing to do with forging the document, and that Israel is the primary suspect.

I have been blogging for a year or more about the nefarious role Israeli diplomats and intelligence operatives are playing regarding the Iranian nuclear issue.  Mostly I’ve been reporting about how this has played out within the U.S.  I’ve noted that Israel has exploited the media to put out a bellicose narrative about Iranian intentions.  This new report of a possible Mossad forgery is of a piece with everything I’ve written previously.

The following passage has to make you suspect any and all reporting on Iran emanating from the Murdoch-rag, the Times of the London:

The Times of London story published Dec. 14 did not identify the source of the document. But it quoted “an Asian intelligence source” – a term some news media have used for Israeli intelligence officials – as confirming that his government believes Iran was working on a neutron initiator as recently as 2007.

…”The Rupert Murdoch chain has been used extensively to publish false intelligence from the Israelis and occasionally from the British government,” Giraldi said.

Would you buy a used conflict from this intelligence agency?

What is particularly cynical about the forgery if it was perpetrated by the Mossad is that they care little whether their chicanery has been discovered.  By then, the original fraudulent report has been absorbed into the political atmosphere and tilted the balance against Iran and in favor of Israeli interests in demonizing that country.  In other words, the damage has been done and it’s hard to put that genie back in the bottle.

Also disgusting about this report if true, is that either the U.S. or Israel could go to war against Iran on the basis, once again (cf. Iraq), of fraudulent claims by intelligence agencies which have their own political agendas.  The Mossad doesn’t care a whit about the thousands of Iranians, Americans and even Israelis who may be killed as a result of such hostilities.  For them, it’s part of geopolitical gamesmanship aimed at protecting Israeli hegemony in its sphere of influence.  Iran is little more than a foil for their machinations.

There may be some in the Mossad who truly do believe Iran is an existential threat to Israel which must be stopped at all costs (though I have my doubts).  But just because their delusions are sincere doesn’t mean we should let them lead us down the garden path to a Middle East conflagration. Caveat emptor!  As I was writing this I thought of that wonderful old political slogan aimed at Richard Nixon: “Would you buy a used car from this man?”  This should also apply to the level of trust we place in the Mossad, the Times of London, or any party with its own agenda around the subject of Iran’s nuclear program: “Would you buy a used conflict from this intelligence agency/newspaper?”

H/t to Dick Blakney.

Gee, But It’s Great to Be Back Home

Monday, December 28th, 2009
Only in Florida, glory to the garish (Sun Sentinel)

Only in Florida: glory to the garish (Sun Sentinel)

I’m a sucker for old pop song lyrics.  That old Simon & Garfunkle lyric is rattling around in my brain as my family returned from a week-long “vacation” (for the kids, not the grown-ups) in Sarasota, where their grandma lives.  They whiled away the hours in the hotel pool proudly displaying their swimming skills to mom and dad over, and over, and over, etc.

Sarasota (and all of Florida as far as I’m concerned) is a strange place.  Quite charming in some respects especially for its old antique historic charm as the winter home of the Ringling Bros. circus and the Ringling family.  There are musty old gems like the Children’s Garden (where I discovered that the founder’s daughter is daughter in law of Seattle Times columnist, Danny Westneat).  There are gorgeous beauties like the Marie Selby orchid garden.  But the new Sarasota can be garish and lurid.  Witness this horrid piece of Soviet-sized public sculpture that graces the most well-traveled intersection in town.  The sculpture is a rip off of a famous historic image of a sailor kissing a girl in Manhattan on V-E Day.

Google search for Coteret blog

Food in Sarasota can range from the perfunctory or just plain awful to the sublime.  We had a lovely meal at Derek’s Culinary Casual in the historic Rosemary District.  The restaurant combines two storefronts with 20 foot high ceilings and elegant decor.  We loved the fact that it was away from the hip, happnin’ Main Street restaurant/bar scene.  This being a town in which the average age hovered around 70 (pharmacies graced every street corner), portions were double what we’re used to in Seattle.

We loved the creamed spaetzle and I had a lucious desert humorously called Smores: chocolate pudding cunningly described as “chocolate pate” on the menu, topped with homemade marshmallow, with a honey graham crust below.

But home is really where I wanna be, as the song goes.

While I was away my Israeli blogging friend, Didi Remez, reported that one of his visitors used the following Google search terms to reach his blog, “Kill Richard Silverstein.”

Maybe it’s time to draw up a last will and testament.  I document weirdness like this because I haven’t been able to get either the Seattle Police Department or FBI to take the threats seriously.  If God forbid something did happen, I want this to be on the public record.

Shelly Adelson Buys Himself a Newspaper and a Government

Monday, December 28th, 2009
Shelly Adelson, gambling mogul and Bibi Netanyahu patron

Shelly Adelson, gambling mogul and Bibi Netanyahu sugar daddy

I’ve written here a number of times about the pernicious influence Sheldon Adelson wields both in Israeli journalism and politics through his billions spent lavishly to fund far-right causes like the Shalem Center and the free daily, Yisrael HaYom (widely and derisively known as Bibiton–roughly translated as “Bibi’s rag”).  Adelson, who made his billions off the misery of gambling addicts, loves Bibi and spent immense amounts ensuring he became prime minister and now that he is, that he stays so.  He founded from scratch Yisrael HaYom, whose politics are a neocon cross between the Daily News, Wall Street Journal and Jerusalem Post.  He spent money like it was going out of style, recruiting major journalists who worked for other papers.  Most importantly, the newstand price was right–nothing.

Exactly what one would expect to happen did: the circulation of the other Israeli tabloids, Yediot Achronot and especially the right-wing Maariv, plummeted.  Since they actually operate on an economic model and need to make a profit to survive, they couldn’t afford to match Yisrael HaYom’s rock bottom price.

In a battle to stay alive, Maariv enlisted Knesset members to draft a law which essentially would end Adelson’s support for Yisrael HaYom by requiring that all Israeli newspapers have Israeli ownership.  I’m guessing that even if this bill passed that Adelson, who must retain a team of crack attorneys for just this eventuality, would figure out a way to co-opt an Israeli to be his front-man owner.

The point is, as much as I detest Adelson and his Israeli vanity publication, this can’t be the way to go about addressing this issue.  The nativist prejudice inherent in it are offensive and objectionable.  If you believe as I do that Adelson has purchased not only a newspaper, but a virtual monopoly on political discourse through his billions, there should be a way to counter this.  Perhaps you could limit the amount an individual owner could sink into his paper without earning a legitimate return.  Or you could define newspapers that do not have an economic model in a different legal category than one that does–and then offer public funds to the legitimate newspapers to place them on a more even playing field.

I realize that each of my suggestions probably has weaknesses of its own.  But I’m sure a creative legal mind should come up with a less offensive proposal than this one.  Can it really be in Israel’s best interests to have this Citizen Kane/William Randolph Hearst wannabe peeling off wads of shekel notes to any Israeli newspaper reader or pol who will belly up to the bar?

Thanks to Didi Remez for offering us the fulsome, sycophantic praises of Adelson’s Israeli and American Jewish toadies who are also opposing the Knesset bill: Natan Sharansky, Abe Foxman and Alan Dershowitz.  Didi acutely notes that Sharansky, who frames his opposition in principled democratic terms, is deeply beholden financially to Adelson, who is the major backer of the Shalem Center, where the right-wing Israeli pol plays host to a neocon think tank.  Abe Foxman, a “good friend” of Adelson who’s flown on the latter’s corporate jet, warns Israel “don’t hurt American Jews.”  As if Israel isn’t a sovereign nation allowed to determine its own internal policies, even if they inconvenience Abe’s special chums.

I reserve my final and most derisive comments for Der Dersh who said:

“I am not sure that this bill is constitutional,” Dershowitz said…

Say it ain’t so, Al.  Israel?  A constitution?  This is the guy who puffs up his bio with accolades like ““one of [the United State's] ‘most distinguished defenders of individual rights…’”  Yet this defender of human rights neglects to remember that Israel has no constitution.  In fact, if Israel had a constitution it might actually be the democracy that shills like Dersh claim it is.  Dershowitz clearly not only doesn’t know Israel has none, he doesn’t really care about the very rights such a constitution would protect.  He cares only for Jewish rights.  You’ll never hear this man mouth a word on behalf of Israeli Palestinian citizens’ rights.  That’s because Dershowitz really sees Israel as an ethnocracy in which Jewish rights predominate.  He also, being the great human rights advocate he is, is fully prepared for Israel’s minority community to remain second-class citizens in a Jewish supremacist state.

Didi closes with this incisive critique of Dershowitz’s blind spot when it comes to the Israeli power elite:

The ease with which Dershowitz chooses to tether his reputation to financial interests, just because they share his political views, is testament to how pro-Israeli advocacy has warped the intellectual standards of some Jewish-Americans.

This brings to mind that disgusting video shot by Adalah-NY, showing Der Dersh exiting Lev Leviev’s Madison Avenue jewelry emporium with a shopping bag held triumphantly aloft.  Leviev is the darling and mega-funder of Chabad, oppressor of poor southern African miners who produce his baubles, and builder of illegal West Bank settlements.  Clearly, Dershowitz’s alliances are with the monied pro-Israel elite like Leviev and Adelson.  He has long since abandoned any pretext of supporting the rights and needs of the little man in Israel.

Iran Descends into the Maelstrom

Sunday, December 27th, 2009

The N.Y. Times features riveting coverage of today’s protests and blood running in the streets of Teheran and Tabriz.  As I always say in commenting on developments there, one never knows what the future will bring and I could be wrong in what I’m about to write.  But we seem to have entered a strange, very dangerous twilight zone in which either the best or the worst could happen.  This is eastern Europe just before the Wall fell.  It is South African just before Botha decided that he must cede power to avoid a civil war and national bloodbath.  It is 1992 and Yeltsin facing down the tanks prepared to overthrow the regime. 

But it could also be China just before the Tianamen Square crackdown.  The only difference being that China had a relatively unified government under Deng Xiaoping while Iran’s power is much more fragmented and chaotic.  I don’t believe there is a unified Iranian command which can overwhelm the opposition as the Chinese government did after the massacre. 

The assassination of Mir Hossein Moussavi’s nephew by regime thugs indicates that even the regime loyalists have begun to lose their bearings.  It is precisely these types of lunatic gestures by those in nominal power which will drive the few remaining Iranians who support them, away in disgust.  Further, the government’s theft of the body and its chutzpahdik warning to the family not to mourn his death is far beyond cruel, and will redound to the shame of the thuggish operatives who performed this vile deed.

Also, the mullahs’ eager embrace of violence against their fellow countrymen during the nation’s foremost religious holiday, when any form of violence is normally eschewed  in commemoration of the violence committed against the founder of Shiism, also indicates the regime is becoming unmoored.  

Iranian policeman dons green colors of reform opposition (Mehdi Saharkhiz)

 There were some very moving passages in the Times’ coverage which also begin to indicate the kinds of defections from the ranks that one sees when power is devolving from the incumbents to the insurgents: 

There were scattered reports of police officers surrendering, or refusing to fight. Several videos posted on the Internet show officers holding up their helmets and walking away from the melee, as protesters pat them on the back in appreciation. In one photograph, a police officer can be seen holding his arms up and wearing a bright green headband, the signature color of the opposition movement… 

I am also impressed with the opposition’s bold appropriation of Shiite religious imagery in order to destroy the government’s claim to religious authenticity and coopt the Shiite faithful into its movement: 

“This is the month of blood, Yazid will fall,” the protesters shouted, equating Ayatollah Khamenei with Yazid, the ruler who ordered Imam Hussein’s killing. 

While I have not seen the opposition thus far proving able to mount a knockout blow to the regime; with tactics like this they are definitely proving sophisticated in their ability to undermine its credibility with the faithful who maintain its power and legitimacy. 

I want to return to an important theme that may not appear relevant at first to this post.  It is simply ridiculous at a time like this for the U.S. and its western allies to be contemplating punitive actions against Iran.  The situation there is simply far too volatile and it would be exploited by the regime to denounce its opponents and thereby preserve power. 

We need to do one thing and one thing only: support the overall concept of human rights and denounce violations of the sort that occurred today.  This will speak louder than anything else about what are our true priorities.  If we muck about with sanctions or God forbid play with fire by calling for armed force against Iran regarding its nuclear program, we are simply playing into the hands of those we hate and undermining those we support. 

There are those in the Israeli government and among the neocons here who don’t believe there is any difference between radical mullahs and reformers in Iran. As far as they’re concerned it’s foolish to make a distinction or to modulate policy to benefit one side or another.  But this attitude is a deeply pernicious and wrong-headed one which we must rebut strenuously.  That is why the Times’ editorial decision to publish Alan Kuperman’s op ed calling for blood against Iran as the only way to solve the nuclear crisis is so troubling.  This is precisely what the policy debate does NOT need to entertain as it will prove disastrous to our own interests and to Iran’s as well.

Obama Administration Hangs Rosenthal Out to Dry for Criticism of Oren

Saturday, December 26th, 2009
Rosenthal suffers the slings and arrows of Israel lobby

Hannah Rosenthal suffers the slings and arrows of outrageous Israel lobby

I find myself deeply disturbed by the Obama administration’s abandoning its support of its State Department anti-Semitism official, Hannah Rosenthal, for her mild rebuke of the Israeli ambassador for his refusal to attend the J Street national conference.  Rosenthal has become the bete noire of the Israel lobby and attacked for her former role as a member of the J Street board.  Supposedly holding such a position identifies her as being insufficiently supportive of this Israeli government.

The Israeli response to Rosenthal’s remarks has been the equivalent of a firestorm and characteristically disingenuous:

Senior government officials told Haaretz on Friday that “We were surprised at Ms. Rosenthal’s remarks, as reported in Haaretz.” The officials stressed that he comments “don’t reflect the nature of the relations between Israel and the U.S., nor do they reflect the great respect and appreciation of the ambassador and his staff felt both in Jerusalem and in Washington.”

Does Israel really believe that the Obama administration is pleased that Oren stiffed J Street, when the former sent its national security advisor as the conference keynote speaker??  As for holding Oren in “great respect” such respect is in the eye of the beholder, in this case, Israel.  I can’t speak for the Administration, but Oren is held in disrepute by most peace-loving American Jews.  He’s a weasel and little more than an elegant fob for the rightist Israeli government.

I’d like to bring further proof of my claim.  The Forward reports that Oren gave a deeply disingenuous report to a Conservative Jewish gathering in DC in which he claimed that a Conservative Jewish supporter of Women of the Wall was NOT arrested by Israeli police at a demonstration a few weeks ago.  This despite the fact that Haaretz reported that she WAS forcibly arrested, questioned at a police station for 2 1/2 hours and forced to sign a statement that she would refrain from coming to the Kotel for 15 days.

Based on a highly reliable source, I believe that Oren knew he was lying when he made this statement.  The Forward has reported that Oren has withdrawn with his tail between his legs and now blames the Israeli officials who briefed him on the matter for misspeaking.  He didn’t misspeak.  He thought he could get away with lying.  Only when he was called on it did he attempt to backtrack, rather feebly.

He promised a further “inquiry” to clarify the matter.  Don’t hold your breath.

Further, this meeting with Conservative Jews was the same one at which Oren blasted J Street claiming fraudulently that it never supported the policies of any Israeli government.  They say that a diplomat is a man who happily lies in service to his country.  That couldn’t be truer in Oren’s case.

Returning to Rosenthal, the Israelis have exhibited further chutzpah in this statement:

Senior Israeli officials told their American colleagues that it was unacceptable for an administration official to publicly criticize Israel’s ambassador over his relationship with Jewish organizations…

Why?  What’s sacred about the ambassador’s non-existent relationship with J Street such that it cannot be faulted by an American Jew who happens to serve in the Administration?

What disappoints me most about the Rosenthal affair is the Administration rolling over in the face of Israeli displeasure:

U.S. Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for Near East Affairs, Jeffrey Feltman, issued a statement distancing himself from Rosenthal’s remarks. Statements were also delivered to the Israeli embassy in Washington stating that Rosenthal’s sentiments do not reflect the position of the U.S. administration.

Cowards.  Wimps.  Rosenthal was right.  She said nothing radical or uncivil or embarrassing to the U.S.  They should’ve released a statement saying merely that Rosenthal was speaking in a personal capacity and that her views don’t necessarily reflect those of the Administration.  To renounce what she said is chicken-shit.

Of course, one has to understand that the reporters who wrote this story are two of Israel’s great stenographers on behalf of the government and power elite.  Neither Barak Ravid nor Natasha Mozgovaya ever deviate from the party line in government ministries in Israel.  So whether they’re reporting accurately the U.S. government response, or merely reporting the response as their government minders would like them to isn’t clear.

The Conference of Presidents, run by that neocon Israel-firster, Malcolm Hoenlein, has denounced Rosenthal and asked for her head:

Alan Solow, chairman of the Conference of Presidents of Major Jewish Organizations…issued a condemnation of Rosenthal’s remarks, casting doubt over her ability to fulfill her responsibilities as an opponent of anti-Semitism.

“As an official of the United States government, it is inappropriate for the anti-Semitism envoy to be expressing her personal views on the positions Ambassador Oren has taken as well as on the subject of who needs to be heard from in the Jewish community. Such statements have nothing to do with her responsibilities and, based upon comments I am already receiving, could threaten to limit her effectiveness in the area for which she is actually responsible,” said the statement.

What Solow (I’ll bet this statement was written for him by Hoenlein or his PR flack) really means to say is that Rosenthal has no right to criticize any Israeli official even when his actions are detrimental to U.S. policy, as Oren’s were.  That notion of the Israeli ambassador as sacred cow is preposterous.  J Street represents an entirely legitimate Jewish organization that supports U.S. policy and advances the prospects for Israeli-Palestinian peace.  Oren’s refusal to engage with them is a slap at J Street and indirectly a slap at Obama administration Middle East policy.

While I have no doubt that Rosenthal’s views were deeply personally held.  That doesn’t make them personal views alone in this context.  They were legitimate views about policy and as such she had a right to make them and her government should’ve supported her more fully.

I hope someone in the Administration will slap down the Conference and Hoenlein before they get too big for their britches.  If they don’t, the next thing you know they’ll be on the warpath for Hannah Rosenthal’s scalp.  We owe her support in that eventuality.

Performance Optimization WordPress Plugins by W3 EDGE